By Larry Romanoff for the Saker Blog
From their experiences in the formulation, manipulation and control of public perception and opinion with the CPI, both Lippman and Bernays later wrote of their open contempt for a “malleable and hopelessly ill-informed public” in America. (1) Lippmann had already written that the people in a democracy were simply “a bewildered herd” of “ignorant and meddlesome outsiders” (2) who should be maintained only as “interested spectators”, to be controlled by the elite “secret government”. They concluded that in a multi-party electoral system (a democracy), public opinion had to be “created by an organized intelligence” and “engineered by an invisible government”, with the people relegated to the status of uninformed observers, a situation that has existed without interruption in the US for the past 95 years. Bernays believed that only a few possessed the necessary insight into the Big Picture to be entrusted with this sacred task, and considered himself as one member of this select few.
“Throughout his career, Bernays was utterly cynical in his manipulation of the masses. In complete disregard of the personal importance of their sincerely held values, aspirations, emotions, and beliefs, he saw them as having no significance beyond their use as tools in the furtherance of whatever were the commercial and political ends of his hirers.”
In his book ‘Propaganda’, (3) (3a)(4) Bernays wrote, “It was, of course, the astounding success of propaganda during the war that opened the eyes of the intelligent few in all departments of life to the possibilities of regimenting the public mind. It was only natural, after the war ended, that intelligent persons should ask themselves whether it was not possible to apply a similar technique to the problems of peace. The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”
Bernays’ original project was to ensure US entry into the European war, but later he primarily concerned himself with the entrenchment of the twin systems of electoral democracy and unrestricted capitalism the elites had created for their benefit, and with their defense in the face of increased unrest, resistance, and ideological opposition. Discovering that the bewildered herd was not so compliant as he wished, Bernays claimed a necessity to apply “the discipline of science”, i.e., the psychology of propaganda, to the workings of democracy, where his social engineers “would provide the modern state with a foundation upon which a new stability might be realized”. This was what Lippmann termed the necessity of “intelligence and information control” in a democracy, stating that propaganda “has a legitimate and desirable part to play in our democratic system”. Both men pictured modern American society as being dominated by “a relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses”. To Bernays, this was the “logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized”, failing to note that it was his European handlers who organised it this way in the first place.
Lippman and Bernays were not independent in their perverted view of propaganda as a “necessity” of democracy, any more than they were in war marketing, drawing their theories and instruction from their Zionist masters in London. The multi-party electoral system was not designed and implemented because it was the most advanced form of government but rather because it alone offered the greatest opportunities to corrupt politicians through control of money and to manipulate public opinion through control of the press. In his book The Engineering of Consent, (5) (5a) Bernays baldly stated that “The engineering of consent is the very essence of the democratic process”. In other words, the essence of a democracy is that a few “invisible people” manipulate the bewildered herd into believing they are in control of a transparent system of government, by choosing one of two pre-selected candidates who are already bought and paid for by the same invisible people.
Even before the war, the ‘secret government’, i.e., the European handlers of Lippman and Bernays, had fully recognised the possibilities for large-scale population control and had developed far-reaching ambitions of their own in terms of “Democracy Control”, and using the US government once again as a tool. Their interest was not limited to merely the American population, but quickly included much of the Western world. With Lippman and Bernays as their agents, these invisible people had the US government applying Bernays’ principles in nations all over the world, adding the CIA Project Mockingbird (6) (7) (8) (9) (10), the VOA (11) (12), Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia, Radio Liberty, and much more to their tools of manipulation of the perceptions and beliefs of peoples of dozens of nations. The US State Department, by now totally onside, claimed that “propaganda abroad is indispensable” for what it termed “public information management”. It also recognised the need for absolute secrecy, stating that “if the American people ever get the idea that the high-powered propaganda machine was working on them, the result would be disaster”. But the high-powered machine was indeed working on them, and continued to an extent that might have impressed even Bernays.
The history of propaganda and its use in manipulating and controlling public opinion in the US, and in Western democracies generally, is a long story involving many apparently disparate and unrelated events. A major crisis point for elite control of American democracy was the Vietnam War, the one period in history when the American people were treated to accurate media coverage of what their government was actually doing in another country. Due to the horrific revelations of American torture and brutality, public protests were so widespread that the US was on the verge of anarchy and became almost ungovernable. Americans were tearing up their military draft notices and fleeing to Canada to escape military service. Streets and university campuses were overwhelmed with protests and riots, at least until Nixon ordered the students shot in the back. (13) (14) (15) That was in 1970, but in 1971, Daniel Ellsberg stole “The Pentagon Papers” from the RAND corporation where he worked, and leaked them to the media, and that was the beginning of the end. After the political fallout and Nixon’s resignation, Bernays’ secret government went into overdrive and the American political landscape changed forever.
A major part of this ‘democratic overdrive’ was the almost immediate creation in July of 1973 by David Rockefeller, Rothschild, and some “private citizens”, of a US-based think tank called ‘the Trilateral Commission’. (16) At the time, Rockefeller was Chairman of Rothschild’s Council on Foreign Relations as well as Chairman of the Rothschild-controlled Chase Manhattan Bank. Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was Obama’s Foreign Policy Advisor, was a ‘co-founder’. The necessity for the formation of this group was officially attributed to the Middle-East oil crisis, but they focused on a much more important crisis – that of democracy, which was exhibiting clear signs of going where no man should go. At the time, with a modicum of free press remaining, the Washington Post published an article titled “Beware of the Trilateral commission” (17). They would not do so again. Any criticism of the Commission is today officially listed by the US government as a ‘conspiracy theory’. (18)
I could find no record of any report by the Trilateral Commission on the Mid-East oil crisis, and it appears their first major report, published by New York University in 1975 only two years after their formation, was titled, “The Crisis of Democracy” (19) (20), a lead writer of which was a Harvard professor named Samuel Huntington.
In the paper, Huntington stated that “The 1960’s witnessed an upsurge of democratic fervor in America”, with an alarming increase of citizens participating in marches, protests and demonstrations, all evidence of “a reassertion of equality as a goal in social, economic and political life”, equality being something no democracy can afford. He claimed, “The essence of the democratic surge of the 1960’s was a general challenge to existing systems of authority, public and private. In one form or another, it manifested itself in the family, the university, business, public and private associations, politics, the governmental bureaucracy, and the military services.”
Huntington, who had been a propaganda consultant to the US government during its war on Vietnam, further lamented that the common people no longer considered the elites and bankers to be superior and felt little obligation or duty to obey. We needn’t do much reading between the lines to see that Huntington’s real complaint was that the wealthy elites, those of the secret government, were coming under increasing public attack due to revelations of grand abuses of their wealth and power. They were no longer admired and respected, nor even particularly feared, but instead were increasingly despised. The people also abandoned trust in their government due to the realisation of the extensive infiltration of the White House and Congress by Bernays’ “shrewd operators”, leading to, in Huntington’s words, “a decline in the authority, status, influence, and effectiveness of the presidency”.
Huntington concluded that the US was suffering from “an excess of democracy”, writing that “the effective operation of a democratic political system usually requires apathy and noninvolvement”, stating this was crucial because it was precisely these qualities of the public that “enabled democracy to function effectively”. True to his racist roots, he identified “the blacks” as one such group that was becoming “too democratic” and posing a danger to the political system. He ended his report by stating that “the vulnerability of democracy, essentially the ‘crisis of democracy'”, stemmed from a society that was becoming educated and was participating, and that the nation needed “a more balanced existence” with what he called “desirable limits to the extension of political democracy”. In other words, the real crisis in democracy was that the people were beginning to believe in the “government by the people, for the people” part, and not only actually becoming involved but beginning to despise and disobey those who had been running the country solely for their own financial and political advantage. And of course, the solution was to engineer a social situation with less education and democracy and more authority from the secret government of the elites.
Democracy, according to Huntington, consisted of the appearance but not the substance, a construct whereby the shrewd elites selected candidates for whom the people could pretend to vote, but who would be controlled by, and obey their masters. Having thus participated in ‘democracy’, the people would be expected to return to their normal state of apathy and noninvolvement.
Noam Chomsky also noted in an article that in the student activism of the 1960s and early 1970s, the nation apparently risked becoming too well educated, creating the Trilateral Commission’s ‘crisis of democracy’. In other words, the ignorance necessary for the maintenance of a multi-party government system was at risk of being eroded by students who were actually learning things that Bernays’ secret government didn’t want them to learn. “The Commission in a report decried the focus on what it called “special-interest groups” like women, workers and students, trying to gain rights within the political arena that were clearly “against the national interest” [of the top 1%]”. The Commission stated it was especially concerned with schools and universities that were not doing their job of “properly indoctrinating the young” and that “we have to have more moderation in democracy”. From there, the path forward was clear: young people in America would now be “properly indoctrinated” by both the public school system and the universities, so as to become “more moderate”, more ignorant, and above all to avoid demanding things like social equality and workers’ rights that were so clearly against the ‘national interest’ of the elites and their ‘secret government’.
Before Huntington and the student activism of the 1960s, we had another renowned expert on propaganda, politics and fascism, in the person of another American Jew, Harold Lasswell, who has been admiringly described as “a leading American political scientist and communications theorist, specializing in the analysis of propaganda”, with claims Lasswell was “ranked among the half dozen creative innovators in the social sciences in the twentieth century”. His biographer, Almond, stated firmly that “few would question that [Lasswell] was the most original and productive political scientist of his time”. (21) High praise indeed, reminiscent of that ladled onto Lippman and Bernays – and for the same reasons.
Even earlier, in the late 1930s and early 1940s, the University of Chicago held a series of secret seminars on “communication”, funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, that included some of the most prominent researchers in the fields of ‘communications and sociology’, one of whom was Lasswell. Like Lippman and Bernays before him, and Huntington et al after him, Lasswell was of the opinion that democracy could not sustain itself without a credentialed elite shaping, molding and controlling public opinion through propaganda. He stated that if the elites lacked the necessary force to compel obedience from the masses, then ‘social managers’ must turn to “a whole new technique of control, largely through propaganda”, because of the “ignorance and superstition of the masses”. He claimed that society should not succumb to “democratic dogmatisms about men being the best judges of their own interests”, because they were not. Further, “the best judges are the elites, who must, therefore, be ensured of the means to impose their will, for the common good”. The Rockefeller and other Foundations and think-tanks have been slowly executing this advice now for almost 100 years.
Among the many results of the work of Lippman and Bernays was the subsumption, of initially the Executive Branch and eventually the Legislative Branch as well, of the US government, into a global plan of the European and American bankers and their US corporate and political interests. We speak openly today of the White House and US Congress being overwhelmingly controlled by the Jewish lobby and their multinational corporations, but this forest was planted 100 years ago. By the early 1900s we already had an American government firmly under the powerful influence of, and effectively controlled by, what Bernays termed the “secret government”, and which was controlled in virtually the same manner as the bewildered public herd. During his presidential election campaign in 1912, Theodore Roosevelt said, “Behind the visible government there is an invisible government upon the throne that owes the people no loyalty and recognizes no responsibility”, (22) and claimed it was necessary to destroy this invisible government and undo the corrupt union of business and politics. Roosevelt again:
“It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control over government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction. A small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control over other people’s property, other people’s money, other people’s labor and other people’s lives. For too many of us life was no longer free; liberty no longer real; men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness. These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power.”
Arthur Miller wrote that “Those who formally rule, take their signals and commands not from the electorate as a body, but from a small group of men. It exists even though its existence is denied, and this is one of the secrets of the American social order, but one that is not to be discussed.” And, as Baudelaire told us, “The devil’s best trick is to persuade you that he doesn’t exist”. The truth of this is everywhere to be seen, but few want to look.
Returning to Bernays and his propaganda to save democracy, and the versions promulgated by his heirs, there were two intermixed currents in that river. The most important was for the (largely foreign) bankers and industrialists to regain full control of the US government, especially the economic sectors, the first step being to repair the loosened control of the political parties themselves and the politicians inhabiting them. There is an interesting Chinese document that accurately addresses the deep Jewish influence on the US government at the time, stating: “The Democratic Party belongs to the Morgan family, and the Republican Party belongs to the Rockefeller family. Rockefeller and Morgan, however, belonged to Rothschild.” (23) Then, new and extensive efforts were required to regain social and political control of the population. What they needed was a vaccine, not to protect the American people, but to infect them with an incurable disease pleasantly named ‘democratisation’, but which would be more readily recognisable as zombification. They succeeded.
Democracy had always been hyped in the West as the most perfect form of government, but under the influence of an enormous propaganda campaign it soon morphed into the pinnacle of enlightened human evolution, certainly in the minds of Americans, but in the West generally. Since a multi-party electoral system formed the underpinnings of external (foreign) control of the US government, it was imperative to inject this fiction directly into the American psyche. They did so, to the extent that “democracy”, with its thousands of meanings, is today equivalent to a bible passage – a message from God that by its nature cannot be questioned. Bernays and his people were the source of the deep, abiding – and patently false – conviction in every American heart that democracy is a “universal value”. One of the most foolish and persistent myths these people created was the fairytale that as every people evolved toward perfection and enlightenment, their DNA would mutate and they would develop a God-given, perhaps genetic, craving for a multi-party political system. This conviction is entirely nonsense, without a shred of historical or other evidence to support it, a foolish myth created to further delude the bewildered herd.
But there was much more necessary in terms of social control. By the time Regan replaced Carter in 1980, all the wheels were in motion to permanently disenfranchise American citizens from everything but their by now beloved “democracy”. Regan’s assault on the American public was entirely frontal, with Volcker of the FED plunging the US into one of the most brutal recessions in history, driving down wages and home ownership, destroying a lifetime’s accumulation of personal assets, dramatically increasing unemployment, eliminating labor unions almost entirely, and making the entire nation politically submissive from fear. Interestingly, the more that their precious democracy was impoverishing and emasculating them, the more strongly the American public clung to it, no longer retaining any desire for equality but merely hoping for survival. The eight years of Regan’s presidency were some of the most brutal in US history, but with the power of the propaganda and the willing compliance of the mass media, the American people had no understanding of what was happening to them. The lessons of the 1970s and the Vietnam War were learned well, and Bernays’ “invisible people” reclaimed the US as a colony, both the government and the people, the reclamation cleverly “engineered by an invisible government”.
The full Machiavellian nature of this propaganda, its true intent and results, will not be immediately apparent to readers from this brief essay. The next essay in this short series, a description of the further transition of Bernays’ propaganda methods to education and commerce, will fill in many of the gaps and permit readers to connect more dots and obtain a clearer picture of the entire landscape.
Introduction – If America Dissolves… https://thesaker.is/if-america-dissolves/
Bernays and Propaganda – Part 1 of 5 — https://thesaker.is/bernays-and-propaganda/
Bernays and Propaganda – Part 2 of 5 — The Marketing of War — https://thesaker.is/bernays-and-propaganda-the-marketing-of-war/
Bernays and Propaganda – Part 3 of 5 –– Democracy Control
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 30 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’.
His full archive can be seen at
He can be contacted at: [email protected]
(12) The VOA surrounded China from all neighboring countries, and including a massive presence in Hong Kong, broadcasting American seditionist propaganda into China (according to Bernays’ template) 24 hours a day for generations. It failed, and was finally shut down in 2019. Also, when the Taiwanese scientist identified the 5 original haplotypes of the COVID-19 virus and proved they had originated in the US, it was the VOA that harrassed the man so badly online that he closed all his social media accounts and went dark. Democracy being a coin with only one side, the US greatly resented China Radio International broadcasting “Beijing-friendly programs on over 30 US outlets, many in major American cities.” http://chinaplus.cri.cn/opinion/opedblog/23/20181006/192270.html
(23) The Age of Innovation 2013 Issue 6 95-97 pp. 3 of 1003, The database of scientific and technological journals of Chinese science and technology; http://www.cqvip.com/QK/70988X/201306/46341293.html
Three types of people in the world, Wolves, Sheep, and those in between.
We know who the Wolves are, they are the ones who profit off experimental vaccines.
The sheep are happy to be scared and ignorant, I spent my life as a sheep, but like one who turns into one of the brotherhood as in the Original Omega Man, I turned.
I’m an in-betweener, I just take what I need from the sheep.
If you want change then you have to anger the sheep enough to turn them.
The three species are: Sheep, Pigs, and Dogs.
So says the legendary psychoanalyst Pink Floyd.
You forget the chain of actual events which made this propaganda effective, after all, during the 1930’s the very active and organized union movement kept blatant American fascism at bay. But in the years 1960–1990:
1. the targeting with drugs of the minority communities after the elimination of those revolutionaries in the Black Panther Party by imprisoning, assassination or exile. It was about power–eliminating effective leadership and the destruction of community-based power.
2. the targeting of the labor leaders in the most effective unions for example the assassination of Hoffa. Nixon pardoned Hoffa who was in prison in 1971…”The IBT then endorsed Nixon, a Republican, in his presidential re-election bid in 1972.” It wasn’t just about money ( the Teamster’s pension funds) but also about the fact that Hoffa planned as part of his come-back to organize other transportation workers such as those in the airlines. It was about power and the destruction of working class power
3. The elimination of a draftee army. This is very crucial for the consolidation of power over the working class. In the military without a draft you have no rights…no rights as a citizen soldier to discuss anything. It was about keeping students as a privileged group separate from close proximity to the working class. Remember it was the students who organized the teach-in movement which educated and prepared the ideological basis for the anti war movement including the slogans which were taken to the working class.
4. A series of high level assassinations of charismatic figures from JFK, RFK, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and Che Guevara.
My perspective of living among elderly people who profited greatly from believing in and following the leadership of the American ruling class from 1965–2021 leads me to see that they benefited up until now from drinking at the tainted well and so when they are handed the Kool Ade, well, basically most trust the system and take it.
Standing in line today at the hardware store, I spoke with a man who said he just had his 2nd (mRNA) shot (so called vaccine )and that he was having some “problems” with it but he shrugged and said, “Well, you never know, do you?” I just felt this wave of grief…. “No, you never do know for sure.” I replied even though I have a fairly good idea what will happen and I fear for the worse.
Yes, fear the worst is correct. The holy grail of the Transnational Financiers and their fellow travellers is a NWO and they have maintained this goal in plain sight of the masses. However, since they control the MSM, academia plus the major publishing houses it has been suppressed. Except of course for the few books which slipped through the net such as Professor Carol Quigley, who as insider, had access to their archives and wrote the ground breaking book Tragedy and Hope. In addition, Professor Antony C Sutton exposed in his Trilogy of books about Wall Street how they part financed both the Bolshevik Revolution and the National Socialists. Moreover, international corporations such as Ford, Standard oil IT&T etc, which are owned by Wall Street, helped industrialise the USSR plus build the Nazi industrial war industries. The philosophy behind this is called the Hegelian principle : antithesis +thesis= synthesis which resulted in the orchestration of WW1, with the help of the Milner group, WW2, the Cold War, The U.N, IMF, WB, UNESCO and of course the WHO which in conjunction with the MSM orchestrated the “ pandemic “. The WEF have written a book called the Great Reset. It outlines many of their plans for the useless eaters. Needless to say many offering their arms up to be injected with an experimental gene therapy “vaccine “ are either completely oblivious to their diabolical plans or totally brainwashed into believing the narrative!!
The causes of WW1 as described in regular history books always stuck in my unconscious craw that something was amiss. Then I read “Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War” by Gerry Docherty and Jim MacGregor. This book is along the lines of Carol Quigley. One of the fascinating parts of this book is the lengths that the special scholars went to to hide this most important aspect of WW1. Herbert Hoover played a major role in this in the 1920s. He was awarded the Presidency for this. I consider this to be the lie of the 20th Century. Knowing Hebrew helped these scholars into becoming masters of language manipulation. They hijacked the Jewish religion for their nefarious purposes during the time of the old silk road.
Fast forward to the 9ll Commission Report. This is the lie of the 21st Century, so far, as it may be exceeded by COVID. They did a sloppy job at the cover-up due the difficulty of the task. Yet the sheeple programmed by the controlled media bought it. The main purpose of the 2001 event was install FEAR into the public to enable mass hypnosis and brain washing. This gave our enemies a free hand to pursue their goals.
FEAR is the key. We have to overcome it and use it against our REAL enemies. I say REAL enemies, because they are masters of deception regarding who the enemy is. They deceived Germany that regular Jewish people were responsible. Our real enemies fear the truth, the exposure of who they are. Once that is established, they lose their power and is cause for optimism, especially since the propaganda is becoming so obvious, like the Cuomo situation. They have also deceived us as to how powerful they are.
At this time I have identified the Khazarian Mafia as the real enemy. It is not regular Jewish people who go along with their program due to the mafia’s iron-fisted control of regular Jewish people. They really are victims. The Khazarians blamed all of their evil deeds on the Jewish people which explains “anti-Semitism.” With 9ll, they established Muslims as our enemy. With the BLM/Antifa movement and the staged capitol event, they are directing the hate at the white race.
As I have written before, the 1776 “revolution” saw a change of masters on the North American continent. Until 1776 the colonies were ruled by the English Crown, and after 1776 by the Rothschild’s, who created the United states of America and the American “nation”, where geography was used to create a non existent ethnic group.
George Washington was an English Freemason on the payroll of the Rothschild’s. The HQ of the Freemasons for the US is today situated in Washington DC. It controls the US Government as well as the polticians on the Capitol.
The fact that the Rothschild’s pulled off the 1776 “revolution” did not mean they immediately had full control of the US, bearing in mind the communications of the period. It was a gradual process. They started buying up the press in the US in the second half of the 19th century. In 1913 they created the illegal US Federal Reserve, a private central bank impersonating a “federal” institution. After 1913 the neocons started completing their full proof control of the US. As for “democracy”, the two party system was copied from the English back in the 18th century, a little trick introduced to persuade the “sheep” that they live in a “democracy”. The intent, of course, was to prevent the “sheep”, ie. the modern peasants, from starting insurrections like their forefathers did in the 14th century. By having the two party system, the modern peasants are divided, as they “vote” for two political “parties”, and hence they cannot become a homogeneous force.
And the neocon elite, which controls the invisible Government ? What is their power ? In 1963 they assassinate JFK, whom they could not control. This is done in daylight, as a warning to the “sheep”. After that RFK and MLK are liquidated. Nixon was not assassinated, as that would have been too much. Bob Woodward, Naval Intelligence officer employed by the Washington Post, serves Nixon with Watergate, after which Nixon resigns. The November elections of 2020 saw the most cold blooded and cynical application of voter fraud in US history, with Trump being openly cheated of his election win. It was a soft coup d’etat, with the MSM reduced to a troop of parrots, openly supporting Biden and claiming there was “no” voter fraud. The MSM is, shamefully, followed by politicians on the Capitol as well as by the courts, including the Supreme Court. This is proof that the invisible Government has dictatorial powers in the US.
US society has today been reduced to a level existing in France in 1789, with the French nobility demanding feudal control of the country. This situation was exploited by the Rothschild’s, who use Freemasons to provoke a “revolution”. However, there is one difference. The French revolution was instigated by outside factors. Can outside factors instigate a new “revolution” in the US ? Highly unlikely, nor is it likely that the US will see a civil war, as forecast by some analysts. What the US may well see is political and geographic dissipation, the country breaking up. While the neocons certainly have tremendous influence over the “sheep” by controlling the MSM, there is one media outlet they still do not control, and that is the Internet, which has done a tremendous job in educating the “sheep”. When the Internet was introduced, nobody understood the power it would wield. Yes, the elites in Europe and the US are looking into ways to have the Internet placed under control. However, they should take into account the repercussions.
And the conclusion ? The elites in the US and Europe are turning the clock backwards and reintroducing feudalism. As far as I can see, this process has gone further in the US than it has in Europe. I don’t see how this strategy, in the long run, can work. We already have populism, which even the Pope has denounced. This populism should be a warning to the elites. We shall see if the elites will accept it, or if their greed will be just too much for them to control.
A poll conducted by Bright Line Watch has shown that 29 % of Americans would favor their state from seceding from the United States.
One can, of course, question the accuracy of the poll. However, secessionist movements in the US are a reality, and their popularity can increase should the US Federal Government mismanage affairs, or should the US experience severe financial difficulties.
The Khazarian Mafia controlled of the British Freemasons in 1776. London was their headquarters since the Russians kicked them out of Central Asia. In 1776, the American Freemasons were in control and decided to establish their empire in North America. This mafia conducted a vendetta against the Americans for breaking away in the Revolutionary War. They conducted the War of 1812, and they instigated the Civil War as revenge; like they instigated wars in Europe for 1,000 years. They also lost the profits from the slave trade. They assassinated Lincoln for winning the Civil War. Their infiltration of the Masons was increasing. They got a Freemason, John Wilkes Booth, to do the killing. The “investigation” was a sham which is one of their M.O.s like JFK and 9ll.
They have a permanent vendetta against Russia for kicking them out of Central Asia and for helping the Americans in the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, and the Civil War. They tricked the Czar into WW1, and then had Lenin infiltrate the Russian government and establish Communism. I am not sure about Napoleon, but they got Hitler to invade Russia and caused millions casualties of both countries as revenge. Then their Communist government caused millions more casualties in Russia afterwards. Putin has gotten some control back to the Russians. That is why they got the U.S. to vilify Russia and risk nuclear war. They enjoy casualties for that is their occult blood sacrifice.
I suspect that Stalin was a Khazarian. He came from Georgia which is close to Khazarian territory. He said that those who count the votes is what really matters. With the stolen election, the Communists are in full control of the U.S. Government.
The Khazarians can only operate in strict secrecy. This is their Achilles tendon. When the truth is revealed, they will lose their power.
I partially agree with what you have written. Yes, a combined Russian/Persian military drove the Khazars out of southern Russia. And yes, the Khazars have never forgotten this, seeking revenge against both Russia and Persia (Iran). Netanyahu even had the audacity to state that Iran is situated on holy Jewish land, a historical absjurdity. The Khazars dream of resurrecting their Khazarian Kingdom, which existed briefly. As for Stalin, he was not a Khazar. That bit of disinformation has for years been placed by Western disinformation artists. He broke the back of the Khazars in Russia, sent there by Khazarian bankers in 1917. Just bear in mind what happened to Trotsky.
The term “Social Engineering” actually have two very different meanings:
— The first being the despicable techniques o´pot foreward by Barneis, Lippman and Lascer as described in this above article
— But secondly, a term used for planning the layout pf city, town and residential environs so as to facilitate social interaction amongst all groups living there. Anyone who’s visited The City of London has seen a glaring example of a Central City District built so as to achieve the exact opposite effect.
What Bernays did was show the weakness of the human brain and its susceptibilities. I have often written of the brain’s compulsive reaction to thrills, or excitement, hence sex, gambling, greed etc., but Larry Romanov makes clear the importance of a different element: the reaction to “atrocity propaganda”, a form of excitement, the excitement of the abhorrent. We suspend belief to enjoy the thrill of scandal.
What I have still failed to ‘get my head around’ is: Why Jews? Christianity’s and Islam’s dislike of usury explain Jews and money, but why their racial evil? Of the three monotheistic religions, what is fundamentally different about Judaism that it spawns such hatred?
The Jews believe that Moses was a murderer, Abraham pimped out his wife to the Pharaoh, and David was an adulterer.
The holy books of the Jews have been modified to portray their holiest men as criminal scum. But the Jews will tell you that no modification was involved, and that the Torah tells the truth as it is the word of God, and that all people have flaws.
But the whole point of having cultural heroes is to have models of behavior to aspire to.
Islam makes it clear that Moses, Abraham and David were sinless prophets of God. And Muslims aspire to be likewise, sinless and Godly.
Add to this the fact that Judaism is basically devoid of an afterlife, and you have your answer.
Judaism has been corrupted by the Adversary. Just like Wahhabism, just like Catholicism.
This may be a little off topic yet I feel that propaganda is the vehicle that destroys reality. In this regard I submit the following story that is unfolding in the center of power in Australia
This situation in Australia is a perfect illustration of power. From ancient Rome to the White House to Downing Street. I know this world well. Of how the same people who want to improve the life of their fellow citizens are most times power hungry narcissists who througout history will take advantage of a young woman drunk and semi concious only for her to wake up and say stop …. or contiune. Most likely the continue as the usual responce is ambition often takes precidence. This one apparently said stop.
The Australian case was that the young lady, fearfull of losing her job waited a couple of years in moral agony and without compensation, resigned and went to the press.
Remember this is a power hungry and narcissist world in a small environent where everyone knew the immoralities of power.
After watching her I trully believe she was a moral innocent confused as to what to do. Career vs rape. This is even more sad as the guy involved was not a major power player yet he used a couch in the office of a minister of state.
Are times a’changing or is it the same old story. In other words is the use of moral propangada gaining traction over those political narcissists.
Just a note … I don’t consider Xi in a narcissist class though I know little about the Chinese power structure.
Here is the short video of the Australian situation wherein I examined and explained the severe reaction I received to comments regarding ‘How dare I in relation to misogyny ?’
I found the quotations by Teddy Roosevelt similar to Eisenhower’s warning about the growing power of the Military-Industrial Complex. I give Teddy’s statements about as much credibility as I do Ike’s. Maybe they deserve credit for publicly defining the problem of our times, but if I remember my history correctly, that toxic influence expanded greatly under both their administrations. I’ll gloss over Teddy’s pro-empire and pro-finance record and just point out the biggest turd he left in the USA punch bowl: Woodrow Wilson. Ike, he gave the world the Dulles brothers. If Brzezinski impregnated himself and had sons, (with a little bit of time travel mixed in), they’d be the Dulles boys.
The deep state put Woodrow Wilson in power over Taft, because Taft was practical politician who knew that the Federal Reserve Act and the income tax would be disastrous for the country. Wilson was an academic who didn’t realize his big mistake until after he signed those laws. The deep state was planning and preparing for WW1 ten years in advance. They got those laws passed just in time to finance WW1 and later the forever wars after that. Wilson also eventually committed the U.S. to WW1 and help the deep state crush Germany, but had to wait until after WW2 to establish Israel.
When Washington was sacked by the British it was accompanied by a hurricane. Hmmmmm?
Wonder what was over London during this same time period?
“They are driving toward complete control of the world’s long-range monetary policy and principal world markets for their own profit. they foment foreign wars to aid this objective.” Curtis B. Dall Philadelphia, Penn. April 1968
Though this may seem a bit off topic I would like us all to consider the above quote and the essay’s of Romanov and the culture that surrounds Sturgis, Sema and the Carroll Shelb’ys of the world, Nascar, Indy 500 etc etc and why?
Because if it wasn’t for all of the wars of the 20th Century Peak Oil would not be an issue whatsoever. I dare say that if it wasn’t for these wars we would more than likely not have any energy problems whatsoever and oil would probably last us for centuries perhaps even to a full 1000 years.
To think therefore that because of the greed of a small group of fools and their wars the world would lose it all is the most shocking unbelievable issue surely.
Geo-Politically to this is extremely dangerous isn’t it if lets say the only oil left anywhere is in the Middle East in countries like Iran, Iraq, and other Moslem states? Imagine the sleepless nights of a Zionist Congress in Geneva turn of the Century realizing the great idea but alas no way to sustain it when the one resource is in the hands of her enemies or sill soon be gone?
Can you just hear Rockefeller in his grave ‘what have we done?’ That and perhaps we should have used the ideas of Bernays to push Peak Oil when it mattered the decade after it was discovered.
As for the car/bike culture of the world if they all really knew the truth a lynching I imagine would be much on the mind don’t you think? To see those fools and murderers driving their sports cars while the rest of us can walk or bike due to their own stupidity is not going to be taken to kindly now is it?
Man doesn’t think long term although in Hitlers case a thousand year Reich was the goal lol. Really Hitler the only smart one of the bunch? What did he perhaps take or steal that idea from the people he hated? A people who are themselves in the process of thinking that is their own destiny? lol? I guess someone was thinking about the next generation and so forth and yet he failed due to what? Oil and gas!
And the only voice to help is is always rejected, scorned or laughed at. ‘Love your Enemies.’
Yeah, if we did that Peak Oil wouldn’t be much on the mind at all.
Lastly, even if there is plenty of oil Gail Tverberg over at ourfiniteworld.com gets it right. We need cheap to extract oil and energy to run our world and its economies but those days are long gone. That sweet crude that just bubbled out of the ground is long, long gone. What we are therefore facing is affordability issues and inflation because of it. To find what we need is costing us terribly. We have to go deeper into the ground, into our oceans, and blowing up the crust of the earth, fracking to get out what we can.
I do hope I’m wrong. I’m only repeating what others are saying and adding some of my own observations. There’s pleny to digest over at Gail’s doomer blog if any interested.
Anglo-American controlled “democracy” is one the greatest deceptions ever invented.
This so-called “democracy” is nothing more than a mask for the Anglo-American Evil Empire and its rapacious wars of aggression, “free market” capitalist system, and political oligarchy.
And this fake democracy is propped up by a lying Free Press that is guilty of promoting similar deceptions like Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction; RussiaGate; the Alexei Navalny poisoning; Uighur “genocide”; the 2018 Douma, Syria “chemical attack”; and the 2-decade long big lie called the War on Terrorism.
As Malcolm X stated, American Democracy–nothing but disguised hypocrisy.
1964: The American Nightmare
Does anyone know why Larry Romanoff’s large archive of articles at globalresearch.ca …
… has become inaccessible or has been wiped clean? Since professor Chossudovsky isn’t the censorious type, I’m wondering what’s going on?
Note to Readers:
Larry Romanoff’s large archive of articles at globalresearch.ca and translations of remaining aricles to this date can be found at
and partially at
once this second site is still in construction.
Will be accepted with gratitude in all your native languages.
Please send them to: [email protected]