by Nick Griffin for The Saker Blog
Nick Griffin, a life-long opponent of the European Union and former Member of the European Parliament, explains why – after three years of believing that the rulers of Britain would block Brexit, he now believes it is more likely than not to be delivered.
Are the British people really going to get Brexit? For years, the answer given by well-informed realists has had to be ‘No!’ The UK’s ruling elite was so thoroughly Europhile that they would do whatever it took to block the will of the British people, and Brussels would go along with this deceit, just as they did when the French, the Dutch and the Irish were sold out to the EU by their own masters.
But today I’m going to tell you that it is now more likely than not that Brexit WILL happen. Indeed, assuming the new Boris Johnson regime manages to cling on to power, or is forced into a general election in which Johnson reaches some sort of deal with Nigel Farage, it is now virtually guaranteed.
Of course, there is a faint possibility that the whole Johnson business is a giant game of three-dimensional chess, and that he’s running an elaborate scam with no intention of getting Britain out. But, realistically, if that was the plan, there would be absolutely no purpose in delaying such a betrayal, still less in raising so many expectations.
To encourage and then dash such hopes would be ludicrously self-defeating, so we have to assume that Johnson and Co are serious and that – barring a series of events outside of their control, they WILL deliver Brexit.
So what has changed? Has the Europhile British elite suddenly had a change of heart and decided to do the decent thing by the people who pay their inflated salaries?
Of course not. Leopards don’t change their spots. But, in the case of the UK elite, it was always divided into two leopards, with very different spots. One of them, for years now the stronger animal, was blue with yellow, spots – a thoroughly European beast.
The colours of the, until recently, smaller animal are harder to discern. At first glance, they could be seen to resemble the American flag although, of course, that’s just part of the camouflage. Look closer and the thing’s coat actually looks more like a mass of intertwined dollar signs and Israeli flags!
Even within the USA, opinion has been divided on Britain’s membership of the European Union. Obama, for example, more or less ordered the Brits to vote to Remain – a factor in the decision of quite a few of them to vote to Leave! The neo-cons, by contrast, have become much more hostile to Brussels – particularly since the EU started to display alarming degrees of sympathy for the Palestinians.
It wasn’t always like that. During the Cold War, the US elite was more or less unanimously in favour of British membership of the EU, which right from the start was consistently promoted by the CIA as a block to balance the Soviet Union.
When the Communist regime collapsed in 1989, the US power elite gradually shifted its position on the EU. It moved from fervent support to a sort of agnostic, nothing to do with us boredom. But then it gradually became clear that the European Union was steadily becoming the pawn of the German industrial complex.
Even worse, the Germans were beginning to cosy up to Russia. Within just a few years, the combination of German manufacturing, the European market and Russia’s raw materials were clearly presenting a future threat to the global hegemony of Wall Street, the Federal Reserve and the American military-industrial complex.
On top of this, the in-built liberal-socialist majority within the EU was making it an increasingly large stumbling block to the globalist privatisation free-for-all favoured by the ultra-capitalist ideology promoted by the extremely influential followers of Ayn Rand.
Franco-German moves to create a European Army were seen as a challenge to NATO and to its Stateside leadership, and only served to strengthen the arguments of the anti-EU faction within the US elite.
All this led a significant section of the US Deep state to move towards hostility to the European Union, and to put in place measures to undermine it. From about 2008, this included the relentless media promotion (and, no doubt, funding) of dissident, Euro-sceptic political movements, particularly UKIP in Britain and the Five Star Movement in Italy.
Extremely well-funded globalist and neo-con think tanks, particularly the Henry Jackson Society and the London-based Policy Exchange, began to organise. Their mission – to lay the theoretical groundwork for a globalist, economically liberal, Atlanticist faction within British politics to challenge the pro-EU majority.
To cut a long story short, that faction has just grabbed control of the British ship of state! The Europhile elite have not changed their minds, the highly honed survival instinct of the British Conservative party, which has made it the oldest political party in the world, has simply handed the reins of power to a different bunch of politicians, in hock to a different foreign power. The UK just lurched even further out of the orbit of the Brussels bureaucrats and even closer to the Anglo-Zionist Empire.
Johnson and his gang really do appear committed to delivering Brexit, but before those who voted for it in the first place get too excited, it has to be said that, in delivering the letter of what the people voted for, this bunch will go on to drive a coach and horses through the spirit of that vote.
Because the British people voted Brexit fundamentally in a collective cry of anger and pain over being turned into marginalised outsiders in their own country. Brussels rule was conflated not just with losing our traditional weights and measures, but with the destruction of the old industries – fishing, coal, steel, ship-building – and the devastation of the working class communities that relied on them.
And, of course, with mass immigration, including that from former British colonies in the Third World, an influx which if anything was slowed down by the more recent arrival of generally far more assimilable East Europeans, courtesy of the EU.
On top of that was all the unease of millions of normal people over the political elite’s Gaderene rush to embrace social ultra-liberalism, in particular dripping wet law and order policies and a mania for LGBTQ+ triumphalism. Relentless newspaper headlines about crackpot rulings by the European Court of Justice led to ‘Europe’ getting the blame for a breakdown in law and order and in traditional justice.
Finally, with the majority of the political class urging people to vote to Remain, voting to Leave became a way of punishing the political elite, not just in Brussels, but in Westminster as well.
And yet, looking at the new Boris Johnson cabinet, and listening to his first few speeches as new Prime Minister, it is already all too clear that, while we are going to get Brexit, it certainly will not be the Brexit that the majority of Brits thought they were voting for!
To illustrate this, let’s take a brief, non-exhaustive look at some of the key players in the Johnson regime.
Let’s start with the man himself, noting the speed with which he spoke out about his pride in his partial Turkish Muslim and east European Jewish ancestry and the way in which, if ‘Islamophobia’ or ‘anti-Semitism’ rear their heads, he automatically finds himself thinking in terms of those ancestral loyalties, rather than what is good for Britain – as the British people are surely entitled to insist on in their Prime Minister.
Then, in one of his final campaign speeches, Johnson told the LGBT+ Conservatives (the tautology neatly sums up the state of the party and, more generally, Britain’s ruling political and media classes) that he has their back:
“I will continue to champion LGBT+ equality, get tough on hate crime and ensure that we break down barriers to a fairer society,” Johnson said, according to the group.
“We must do more to ensure that trans rights are protected and those who identify as trans or intersex are able to live their lives with dignity,” he continued, noting that he was one of the first senior party leaders to support same-sex marriage.
Following his meeting with the queen to officially accept the premiership, Johnson specifically mentioned the LGBTQ+ community in his speech outside No. 10 Downing Street.
“[The U.K.’s] brand and political personality is admired and even loved around the world for our inventiveness, for our humour, for our universities, our scientists, our armed forces, our diplomacy for the equalities on which we insist — whether race or gender or LGBT …….. and for the values we stand for around the world,” he said
Once upon a time, British political leaders justified going to war by speaking of making the world safe for democracy. Boris Johnson started his premiership by committing Britain to a global struggle to make the world safe for buggery!
Nor is this fixation with LGBTQ+ new. Although the never-satisfied ‘gay’ lobby is whining about a couple of throwaway ‘homophobic comments’ he made decades ago, Johnson voted in 2003 to repeal Section 28 of the Local Government Act of 1988, by which Margaret Thatcher prohibited local authorities from “promoting homosexuality” or “pretended family relationships.”
This vote opened the door to the indoctrination of school-children with homosexual propaganda. Johnson also voted for civil partnerships for homosexuals and attacked the institution of marriage as ‘bourgeois convention’.
Johnson has also wasted no time reiterating his support for an amnesty for huge numbers of illegal immigrants and boasting of sharing the views of pro-immigration Labour party MPs. Ominously, he has also refused to pledge even to attempt to stick to the upper limits on immigration promised – but of course not delivered – by his predecessor Theresa May.
With Brexit making it harder for Poles and Hungarians to come to Britain, it is already clear from Johnson’s waffle about making the UK ‘open’ and ‘welcoming immigrants’, that, far from stopping immigration as millions of voters expected, Johnson’s Brexit will merely swap Polish immigrants for more Pakistanis, Bulgarians for Botswanans.
Johnson probably will set Britain free from Brussels, but he is also openly committed to speeding up the process by which the duly ‘liberated’ Brits are replaced in their own country by a further flood of immigrants. And the social liberals posing as Johnson’s fake conservatives will urge the stupid Brits to suck it up and celebrate their added diversity.
We’ve already seen the start of this process in Johnson creating what he refers to as a “cabinet for modern Britain” – wording that The Guardian’s Kehinde Andrews rightly described as a “euphemism for non-white”.
Leading Johnson’s Great Replacement charge will be Home Secretary Priti Patel, who has spoken gushingly of how the new government will “ continue to push for a dynamic, global Britain that is outward looking ……Our vision is for a truly global country – one where we welcome the brightest and best, where we are more outward facing, and where we decide who comes here based on what they have to offer.”
The Brits can’t say they weren’t warned. Because capitalism demands not just cheap labour, but also an endless supply of new consumers. Even the worse educated and least assimilable featherless biped on the planet thus has plenty to offer big business. The door is going to open wide to them all.
Patel was forced to resign two years ago after holding secret meetings with Israeli ministers. The meetings included a visit to an Israeli army field hospital in the occupied Golan Heights, where wounded Al Qaeda and ISIS fighters were patched up and sent back to continue fighting against the pro-Christian government in Syria. Patel asked officials within her department to look into whether British aid money could be funneled into this medical centre.
The same dangerous obsequiousness to Israel has also been shown by Johnson’s new Chancellor, Sajid Javid. Two years after becoming MP, Javid told the Conservative Friends of Israel annual lunch that as a British born Muslim if he had to go and live in the Middle East, he would not go to a Muslim majority country: “There is only one place I could possibly go. Israel. The only nation in the Middle East that shares the same democratic values as Britain”.
He is talking, let us remind ourselves, about the last openly racist state on the planet, whose supporters around the world insist on the right of Jews to have their own exclusive homeland, at the very same time as denouncing any attempt by any white nation to restrict immigration or preserve traditional ethnic identities as ‘neo-Nazi’. And the state which has done more than any other –except Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Barak Obama’s White House – to fund, arm and aid the Islamist head-cutters at war in Syria.
In her resignation letter Patel admitted she “fell below the high standards that are expected of a Secretary of State.” Not for the first time! In the past she has been criticised for taking trips to Bahrain funded by that country’s repression Salafist regime, and attending a conference in Washington paid for by the Henry Jackson society.
As already noted, the Henry Jackson operation is one of the best-funded and most dangerous of all the trans-Atlantic neo-con think tanks. It constantly agitates for hostility to Russia, Iraq-war style meddling in the Middle East on behalf of Eretz Israel and Big Oil, and for a poisonous mixture of ultra-right-wing economics and social liberalism – including the privatisation of national assets and the promotion of LGBTQ+ agendas at the expense of traditional values.
The same sort of poison is promoted in Britain by the closely connected Policy Exchange think-tank. This was founded by Michael Gove, who Johnson just appointed as Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, in many ways his political Chief of Staff in parliament.
Gove’s counterpart within the government itself is Munira Mirza, who Johnson just appointed Director of the Number 10 Policy Unit. She was previously Development Director at Policy Exchange and also worked on a range of its publications, including Living Apart Together: British Muslims and the paradox of multiculturalism.
As with all the other material coming out of the Johnson camp about multi-culturalism, this argued that the chief problem with Islam is that it hinders ‘integration’ – i.e. the process by which traditional British cultural and ethnic identity is replaced by the ultimate corporate dream of an atomised mass of rootless, identical consumers. And by which the traditional values once upheld by Christians and now defended mainly by Muslims are to be replaced by the anti-morality of the LGBTQ+ brigade and corporations greedy for pink pounds and rainbow dollars.
As with so many neo-cons on both sides of the Pond, Mirza started off as a Trotskyite. She was a member of the Revolutionary Communist Party. When it was dissolved in 1987 she followed other key comrades into the Living Marxism operation and then Spiked magazine, which has very successfully operated a policy of entryism into what passes for politica thought in Britain. Her Wiki entry quotes an article in the London Review of Books which noted that “Many of Munira’s ex party members have become influential in Conservative or Eurosceptic circles since the dissolution of their party, whilst remaining closely associated with each other’s endeavours.”
This includes the former party leader Frank Furedi, whose wife Ann is one of Britain’s most powerful abortionists. Strange ‘conservatives’ indeed! But, there again, one reading of these ‘ex’-Trotskyites’ new-found fondness for ultra-right-wing economics and privatisation is that the resulting exploitation and public anger will lead to the revolutionary crisis that eluded them when they were all wearing Che T-shirts in the late sixties! Or perhaps, it just pays better!
Coming back closer to Johnson, his campaign chief was Gavin Williamson. When Defence Secretary, Williamson was a notorious hawk against Russia and China, and for greater UK involvement in the Middle East. He also spoke out vigorously against Britain’s continued participation in Galileo, the global navigation satellite system created by the European Union. He is one of those pushing for a new UK system, compatible with the American GPS, and fully integrated with Five Eyes, the intelligence alliance between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States and the UK. As with all such manoeuvres, it is hard to see where money gives way to ideology and power-politics and, of course, they are hopelessly entangled.
It is Williamson who has given one of the clearest glimpses into the Atlanticist obsession of the new regime: “Tthe cornerstone of European security is not the European Union, it is Nato. Let’s be absolutely clear. Our involvement in Nato is going to be there, long, enduring and for many, many defence secretaries after me.”
Another part of the Anglo-American elite can also be seen when you turn over another stone in the Johnson camp.
.Andrew Griffith, the new chief business adviser to Number 10 is a former Rothschild investment banker who joined Rupert Murdoch’s Sky in 1999, and became finance chief for the group in 2008.
Johnson has been spending up to 13 hours a day at Griffith’s lavish £9.5m townhouse,
A Johnson campaign source said Griffith had kindly opened up his home to let members of the transition team meet there. If paying the piper leads to the donor calling the tune, how much more power accrues to the Rothschild/Murdoch man providing the dancers with a 9.5 million pound house?
Finally, we just have time to consider Johnson’s new Chief Whip, Mark Spencer. Taking the new regime’s enthusiasm for LGBTQ+ issues towards its logical liberal intolerant end, he has said that Christian teachers who dare to voice opposition to same-sex marriage should be subject to ‘Extremism Disruption Orders’. In other words, legislation brought in supposedly to stop Islamist hate-preachers recruiting terrorists is to be used against Christians who stand by the teachings of the Bible!
So, yes, we can now expect Brexit from Johnson. But Britain is also going to get more mass immigration. And ruthless demonization of anyone who dares oppose it. More LGBTQ+ propaganda for children – and ruthless repression of anyone who dares oppose it.
More pressure for British participation in neo-con, Zionist and Salafist wars in Syria, Iran and Yemen. More insane and dangerous sabre-rattling against traditionalist and Christian Russia.
And more looting of what remains of Britain’s common wealth by the privatisation vultures. Finishing off the monetisation of the NHS is sure to surface as a great ambition for this corporate puppet regime sooner rather than later. Almost certainly a couple of months before Johnson delivers Brexit and obliterates Jeremy Corbyn in a snap general election.
It remains to be seen whether the globalist kleptomaniacs behind the new regime will also find a way to turn the removal of EU subsidies into an opportunity to arrange a massive transfer of farmland in Britain from farmers, workers’ pension funds and the old landed aristocracy and into the hands of global corporations. If that’s on the agenda too, remember where you heard it first!
All the above presupposes, of course, that the juvenile and utterly irresponsible anti-Russian, anti-Iranian and anti-Chinese sabre-rattling – of which the Johnson regime is as guilty as its predecessors – doesn’t actually start World War Three. Because, if it does, there’ll be nothing left to privatise and loot except the last tin of beans in the irradiated rubble.
Don’t get me wrong: This is not to condemn Brexit. The British people voted for it, and its delivery will be a Good Thing (not least because it has added, and will continue to add, to the instability in the EU which has disrupted the efforts of its bureaucratic rulers to maintain a firmly anti-Russian line, and because, however imperfect, Brexit is a blow for national sovereignty against a particularly nasty little imperial project.
All of us who, one way or another, helped set in motion or advance the process which defeated the pro-EU whores who had sold Britain to Brussels can be rightly proud of having done their bit to break the claws of the largest leopard in the London-based elite.
But you can also be sure that the British majority are going to be mightily disappointed with the new Johnson regime leopard and how Brexit turns out. They voted to restore the old Britain, particularly the Old England. What they will get instead is an even faster dissolution than we saw under EU rule.
They voted against ‘political correctness gone mad’ and in a bid to cling on to traditional values. What they will get is a quasi-Trotskyite cultural Marxist regime – all the more destructive for having the label ‘conservative’ – which grinds their faces – and especially the faces of their children and grandchildren – in LGBTQ+ filth.
They voted Brexit hoping to stop immigration. Instead, the next ten years will see an absolutely swamping change in Britain’s demographics, as the dying early Baby Boomers are replaced with Johnson’s ‘New Britons’ from all corners of the world.
They voted to kick out a Brussels Occupation Government. What they will get instead is a New York Occupation Government. Which is a polite way of putting it, for there is in fact really nothing American about America’s neocons.
“Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss”, is how the Who put it. But it was all summed up even better by the great English visionary William Morris, in A Dream of John Ball, his revolutionary classic about the very first English Peasants’ Revolt against an alien elite:
“I pondered all these things, and how men fight and lose the battle, and the thing that they fought for comes about in spite of their defeat, and when it comes turns out not to be what they meant, and other men have to fight for what they meant under another name.”
This is the best description I have yet seen of the secret American forces giving rise to Brexit. The Henry Jackson society and American hostility to the EU as a hidden motivation of the American deep state comes into much clearer focus for me here. Good reporting! In a way it ties in nicely with the Saker’s latest piece. The predatory nature of the Anglo Zionist empire finally comes to a full circle from England to America and back to England for the final cut.
Being from New Zealand originally I am deeply aware of what is called the “English disease;” that has been so powerfully transmitted into the DNA of the English speaking peoples. That being a vicious form of class hatred combined with a self righteous attitude to predation. This is the high point of self separation and evil for the last patriarchal dominator culture and it is at the same time what drives the downtrodden in England to actually vote for Brexit. From the Roman empire to England and America – crush the people of the earth and rise above them The last empire’s chickens finally coming home to roost!
I’m still convinced that the US Deep State wants the UK to stay in the EU, to act as its enforcer and cats-paw. The desire of the Trumpistas (they just use Trump as their Trojan Horse, useful idiot etc)to destroy the EU, rather than control it, is one of the reasons that the Deep State so hates Trump et al. I rather fear that the splits emerging in the Western elites will make reckless miscalculation even more likely than ever.
”With Brexit making it harder for Poles and Hungarians to come to Britain, it is already clear from Johnson’s waffle about making the UK ‘open’ and ‘welcoming immigrants’, that, far from stopping immigration as millions of voters expected, Johnson’s Brexit will merely swap Polish immigrants for more Pakistanis, Bulgarians for Botswanans.”
Too bad for the Russophobic riff-raff of Eastern Europe. Will they condemn this ultra-buffoon as a ”Putin agent” ?
I doubt that anyone will be flocking to a post hard Brexit UK, expect perhaps human organ traffickers, sex traffickers, paedophile tourists and ‘disaster capitalism’ ‘experts’. I wonder if Jeffrey Sachs is free.
A post brexit Britain can still allow Poles etc. to come to Britain.
“I will continue to champion LGBT+ equality, get tough on hate crime and ensure that we break down barriers to a fairer society /…/ We must do more to ensure that trans rights are protected and those who identify as trans or intersex are able to live their lives with dignity”
Boris reading from the same script as the Ukronazis and the SD party leadership here in Sweden. Zionazi-gays indeed, the whole lot.
Cross-dressers are generally biological males who wear feminine apparel and exhibit female personality traits in the public venue. These persons are tolerated and even pitied as they live their harmless deviant behavior. But now heterosexuals are witness to a growing popular trend where cross-dressers extend their mental delusion by seeking hormone replacement pharmacology and sexual reassignment surgery performed by Aesculapian “healers” comparable to some ghoulish Frankenstein laboratory experiment. Thus medical science has created the transgender; a freakish curiosity like animals of the monotreme order who are mammals that lay eggs instead of giving birth to live young.
Transgenderism follows the same propaganda put forth by non-heterosexuals (a.k.a. queers) that their lifestyle is an election that should be explored even at an early age such as with heterosexual children. This practice is an abomination that denies a child their natural sexual orientation and must be banned. At least the Russian Federation had the courage to ban queers from adopting heterosexual orphaned children.
When adolescents reach adulthood they can decide to be become whatever sexual identify they want but not before then because their innocence knows not what psychological havoc they will experience all do to a pop culture of perversity masquerading as “freedom of choice.”
There was an excellent doco on ABC TV here in Austfailia some years ago where they showed how a gay male couple had fostered numerous female children for years. They were rich, so the lifestyle was alluring, but the girls almost all seemed to have enjoyed the experience, and loved their fostered parents, who had become grandparents as well. They only adopted a boy after many years because of the fear of being smeared as ‘paedos’. The boy, I believe, turned out straight, no doubt because that was his genetic predisposition. We really need to avoid painting all the members of any group as being alike, and good or bad depending on one’s opinions. As for queer sex education, I really think that is best left to adolescence when one becomes aware of one’s orientation, as with all sex education. I really don’t see pre-pubescent sex education as serving any useful purpose, and if parents see it as necessary, then I think that they ought to carry it out.
I completely disagree with your comment in its attempt to rationalize the queer lifestyle by exposing heterosexual orphaned children who live in a captured environment to it.
I do not support the idea that queers should be allowed to adopt heterosexual orphaned children. It is inherent in the psychological and physiological development of heterosexual children to see their adult caretakers do something or say something of an intimate behavior no matter how slight or harmless it appears and then emulate it with other children in various settings because young adolescents are easily influenced.
For example a heterosexual child witnesses their adoptive parents kiss each other with passion. The couple exchange verbal quips of a suggestive, sexual nature to titillate each other. The same couple holds hands and stroke each other physically in public. The same couple takes the child to watch entertainment that reinforces their lifestyle. The same couple engages in sexual intimacy in the privacy of their bedroom and the heterosexual child walks in on his two caretakers by happenstance.
All of the above happens in real life with heterosexual couples and for their birthed or adopted children it’s a normal experience of life. But it is not healthy for a child to be forced to live in the queer world when they are not queer in almost all cases. Children are unable to discern what sodomy is not only from a Hebrew, Christian or Islamic perspective but also the danger of contracting disease.
The lives of impressionable heterosexual children who represent the future of humanity are at great risk not only because they grow up in single parent households or abandoned to orphanages but now are handed over by the State to queer couples. This practice must be prohibited elsewhere as Russia has done.
The example I gave was of a situation where all the female children fostered turned out quite happy, give or take (and fostered children often have hard lives due to the disruption)and were on very good terms with their ‘fathers’. I imagine that everyone in societies where being gay is not criminalised will eventually see a gay couple kissing in public, along with many straight couples. I hardly think that it will have any deleterious effects on their development. And, remember, very, very, many children grow up in straight families where the parents fight one another, assault the other and, often enough, murder their partner, and sometimes the children, too. PS Sodomy occurs in straight relations, too, and normal hetero sex can spread gonorrhoea, syphilis, HIV, HSV, clamydia etc. The greatest perversion of sexuality is to commodify it and separate it from spiritual and human love and fellow feeling. It is a giving act in societies dedicated to taking.
The one instance you present to support your argument that a queer couple has successfully raised “happy” female children is not indicative of the statistical base quantified for this topic of discussion. A certain percentage of heterosexual couples do in fact, exhibit unhealthy and dangerous conduct in the presence of their birth or adopted children inside the confines of the home as compared to queer couples. But what is overlooked by overt, skewed comparison is heterosexuality is the dominant family unit across Planet Earth, therefore the numbers for positive healthy upbringing verses negative emotional and physical suffering of children will be significantly greater than the much smaller population of queer adoptive couples, which by the way, has not been statistically scrutinized.
The idea that society should allow adopted children to be released into the care of queers is based solely upon material and emotional support without regard to the unknown effects on a child’s psyche. Children have long memories that stay with them well into adulthood and their natural sexual orientation is heterosexual in almost all cases. If they grow up exposed to the behaviors of queer men or women they will be tempted to participate in the queer lifestyle because they live in that environment every day. That is unquestionably an abomination for them.
What is overlooked in this flawed social experiment is the importance of the maternal and paternal essence of a male and female couple ingrained upon their children’s development that is the foundation of heterosexuality in perpetuity. To allow the queer perversion of human sexuality to breach the citadel of the traditional family existence is to open Pandora’s box of unbridled hedonism we witness today with grave consternation.
The children raised in queer families have been intensively studied and monitored in numerous studies, and none, as far as I know, have shown any great deviation from straight families. The crucial parameter determining a child’s outcome is the emotional nurturance provided. I do agree that, ideally, a loving straight couple with male and female emotional support and love, is best for children, but that applies in such a small fraction of families these days, given divorce, societal and economic pressures, external exploitation by the media and business, poor schooling, bullying, domestic violence, drug and alcohol abuse etc, that a loving queer family ought not be attacked simply because of the relationship of the parents. Such an attitude only adds to the burden of hatred and rancour dragging societies down throughout the Western world.
We have worked our way to the next stage of thought to what I call the “studies show” of evidentiary discovery. This is where two adversaries present their arguments based upon questionable academic research that should be impartial but often is bias to support a desired conclusion.
For example; here is a study conducted by Cornell University, a prestigious Ivy League school located in Central New York State:
See: https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/ .
Doctor Nathaniel Frank is the director of the “What We know” Project who happens to be a queer who lives with his homosexual husband in Brooklyn, New York and their dog. They do not have children. Doctor Frank champions the non-heterosexual movement that includes transgenderism.
The decision reached by this report was that queer couples fare no worse as parents of heterosexual children. The sampling was based upon 75 selected case reviews. Another 4 reported the children have certain disadvantages concerning challenges of a scholastic education nature.
The glaring omission in all of these case studies was the lack of analysis between orphan children adopted by queer couples verses their own biological children that learned at some point in their upbringing that one or both of their parents engaged in sexual relationships with other queers. To my knowledge, the emotional reaction to that event was never asked in the myriad of pseudo-psychological questions addressed to children of queer parents who reached adulthood and participated in the survey.
“Fare no worse” is the operative phrase that implies queer couples are no different than heterosexuals in parenting outcomes. That evaluation alone uncovers the prejudice of the study as I mentioned in my previous post in the incontrovertible fact the selected sampling was taken from a strikingly smaller population of queer parents verses the greater, overwhelming population of heterosexual parents. If the size of the queer couple sampling was drawn from a similar size group as heterosexual caregivers, the final observation would not be “fare no worse” but something leaning towards a below quality standard of childhood growth within a family unit. I base that on the statistical fact that queer males in relationships have proportionally a greater circumstance of domestic violence.
See: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1007505619577 .
Furthermore, queer couples have much less success in maintaining long-term relationships with their partners verses heterosexual couples.
See: https://homochild.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/homosexual-vs-heterosexual-couples-what-the-statistics-say/ .
I vehemently dispute when you wrote,” … a loving straight couple with male and female emotional support and love, is best for children,but that applies in such a small fraction of families these days, … ” The use of the negative connotation of “a small fraction” is disingenuous on its face; a distortion of dialectic tripe to further the queer agenda that desperately want heterosexuals to “accept” their lifestyle as healthy for adopted heterosexual children.
Your last sentence indirectly implies that enmity and bitterness is the foundation of my position; that is untrue. I have no concern about queers in our society as they contribute much in many professional endeavors. But the idea they as couples can raise orphaned heterosexual children without the temptation to reach a common understanding with them either by rational discourse or even “show and tell” is a risk I cannot accept on their behalf.
Why is “reaching a common understanding” a bad thing?
I think your words speak for themselves as to your own opinions.
Why do you think being queer is a “perversion of human sexuality”?
So agree with your excellent response to what appears to be the promotion of what heterosexuals see as a deviant lifestyle in which innocent children are being raised.
Now, Lesley, make that ‘..some heterosexuals see as a deviant lifestyle..’, please. Many straights see queer ‘lifestyles’ in much less perjorative and negative terms.
It should be pointed out that crossdressers are overwhelmingly heterosexual, not homosexual. They live as men in their daily lives, normally dress as men, and most have no desire to be women. It is a fetish. They crossdress for purposes of sexual titillation. Most have no sexual attraction to men whether crossdressed on not. A small percentage of crossdressers are gay. This percentage seems equivalent to the percentage of homosexuality in the general population.
An even smaller percentage are transgendered and actively seek to be perceived as the opposite gender, as well as seeking chemical and surgical modification of their bodies. Many transgender are also attracted to the opposite sex based on their sex at birth. That is male-to-female (MTF) transgendered classifying themselves as “lesbian”. Since these persons are born male and are attracted to women (despite seeking sexual reassignment surgery) they should also be classified as heterosexual males.
So it’s more accurate to classify heterosexual crossdressers (as well as MTF transsexuals who classify themselves as lesbian) as part of the heterosexual spectrum not as distinct from it.
I don’t disagree with your statement about the nature of males whom are heterosexual by birth but seek to temporarily identify as “female” to service their abnormal sexual deviance. The danger is when transvestites decides to push their lifestyle into the realm of early childhood development and present that it’s ‘normal” to wear women’s apparel including makeup and mannerisms as just playful fantasy and permissible for impressionable heterosexuals who have reached maturative prepubescence; it’s not.
All transgenders start their delusion as cross-dressers, every one. It is a form of dissociative personality disorder and they need long-term psychiatric treatment to uncover why they reject their natural male biology. This is not the same as homosexuals who do not deny their physicality but are sexually aligned with the same gender.
Medical science is traveling a dangerous path when it further enables this emerging human aberration by exploiting the abnormal mental state of transgenders for profit in pharmacology and surgical augmentation. Humans who voluntarily transform themselves into something other than what they are at birth and not for purposes of healing physical deformities will suffer more humiliation and possibly crimes against them should their original gender be discovered as they attempt a relationship with heterosexual males. We already see this today where very feminine “drag queens” flirt with males and wind up assaulted and battered.
Transgenders will not become another taxonomic class no matter how much they aspire to reach such a pinnacle of recognition. They will be relegated to a state of peculiarity; an oddity of human nature run amok.
I also do not disagree with your point. However, my understanding is that heterosexual crossdressers are typically not proud (even ashamed) of their lifestyle and go to great lengths to hide this from others especially children. My guess is that the persons advocating the acceptance of this lifestyle as normal are not themselves members of this group but instead are either well-meaning social activists or have other unknown motivations.
What you say about not being proud applies to pretty much all the gay men and lesbians I have met – (at least a hundred). i have never seen any genuine pride in them or what they do. Just mania (a caricature of happiness). All the ones I know are alcoholic pretty much and like drugs, most are on Prozac etc
That’s why I always found their PRIDE events to be very Orwellian – as is their label ‘gay’ – when most of them are depressed, on Prozac and many other drugs and not interested in love – just sex with strangers they meet in dark bars and hope to never see again.
Homophobia is yet another Orwellian word – I cannot even imagine anyone being scared of a homosexual – it’s laughable.
Also most gays I know are Jewish and most of them hate/fear their manipulative controlling unmotherly mothers
a few days ago here in Toronto – I saw 2 trannies within 5 or so hours. One was a skinny man with a pink wig wearing military shorts and a stick he was poking in the air talking about a German guy he met. As soon as he saw me with my Norwich Terrier he stopped talking and crossed the road. He looked very angry.
Then later on a train I saw what I thought was a young girl (from far away) – maybe 25 or so. ‘She’ was dancing like a crazy person and then walked towards me and set very close to me and then started talking to herself out loud that ‘she’ was hoping to maybe even find a boyfriend. This was obviously a man dressed as a woman with big feet and deep voice. So both these trannies were talking about hoping to find a man.
It was very strange and sad at the same time.
I have met a few such trannies while I lived in LA and have never seen a happy, confident tranny – they were mostly control freaks and manic. I have actually never even met a happy gay person. Maybe one, and I have met a hundred and more while I lived in LA
So what has changed? Britain still has their own currency and you really can’t be part of a currency union with both sides have different currencies. Britain wants to devalue, US wants to devalue and not real sure if the Euro can. October is about as late as you can push this out, Nordstream 2 goes live end of the year, Siberian pipeline goes live early next year, what is there to give the d0llar and the Pound any support, without the Petrol D0llar system still functioning.
Boris is just another Zionist stooge at best.
His administration, based on himself and his cabinet picks, is thoroughly compromised as it relates to the corrosive influence of Israel and its supporters and the people of the UK should not expect much from it.
Jeremy Corbyn who has been targeted for destruction by Israel and its supporters for continuing to insist that Palestinians are human beings, will not be allowed to set foot in Number 10 Downing Street, so the people of the UK will have no choice but to deal with Boris, Israel’s preferred candidate.
A bogus Brexit can be expected.
Yes-the Blairites, the Guardian vermin and the UK Zionazi elite will now go into overdrive to destroy Corbyn. It will be very ugly. Israel uber alles, as they say.
I see your targeting system is fully operational and 100% accurate.
Fascinating article !
Amazing cocktail they have there in the UK……Anglo-Zionist, Neo-Con, LGBTQ+, Zionist loving Wahabi South-Asian Muslim traitors. A really amazing collection of corruption and Godlessness.
Is it just me or are the Zionist Israeli Jews actively trying to weaken the West? Not that the West isn’t doing its best, but there is something spiritually very evil about what is happening. It seems the Zionists are using all of their power to infiltrate and corrupt the West in order to decrease their native population and replacing them by people from other countries that they have assisted in destroying in the first place.
It looks like the Zionist plan is to weaken the West in order to control them. The Anglo-part of the Anglo-Zionist alliance is being thrown in the dustbin of history.
It is not just you.
Actually, you give a neat description. Just realize which ‘cult’ despises Christianity the most (Christ is seen as a Prophet in Islam), and has a deep embedded conviction of chosenness to rule the world as a superior entity.
The mass immigration, the LBGTBBQ+ ,diversity and inclusivity salafism that is hammered upon us, it’s a dark agenda to break down tradition and society itself, in order to rule it.
A short while ago, Frans Timmermans of the EU stated that monocultural societies should cease to exist. I beg you pardon? He forgot to mention that only nation that is going in the opposite direction, not even to mention all hardship to form a sunni caliphate and now a kurdish enclave in Syria, and no reporter dares to ask.
Speaking of Europe – we don’t have a neat track record over the ages to handle these problems nicely.
Multiculturalism is like climate change-it is the pace at which it occurs that makes the difference. All great cultures and societies have been influenced and changed by alien invasions and incursions, whether rapid and war-like, or slow and incremental. The English are an amalgam of Celts, Roman Empire all-sorts, Angles, Saxons and Jutes, Normans, Vikings, Jews, black African slaves, Caribbean slave descendants, Spanish washed ashore after the Armada etc. The same is true everywhere, but when you swamp a country with hundreds of thousands from outside, in a few years, as cheap labour to undercut the locals, then it will, and I think is designed to, incite angst and social disharmony ie ‘Divide and Rule’ tactics, as ever.
Basically, it is the Antichrist system to replace the Christian one: this is what satan – or lucifer – is intent on doing since he is filled with hatred of Christ and anything to do with Him. There are countless examples all around which is noticeable but puzzling for many, and this is the explanation for it.
Just like the New Testament mentions, and secularly described somewhat by Orwell, it is not about left v right, rich v poor, Muslims – v anybody else etc etc, but good v evil.
Wrt to Brexit, it’s maybe not like jumping out of the frying pan into the fire, but maybe rather jumping into another pan. Some consider the leaving of Britain from the eu in line with Biblical prophesy, with the eu as the new ‘Roman Empire’, but with the roman catholic church in power through the 2 popes, the end game being for the destruction or takeover of the Russian Orthodox church, and all other religions for that matter, with ultimately the revelation of the Antichrist and him not staying in the vatican, but moving to Jerusalem…
What a lengthy, well written, useless diatribe to describe Boris-Brexit and Britain.
It could have ALL been summed up with something like…
“The British EL-ites have put in ANOTHER vile, anti-Human, idiotic sock-puppet at 10 Downing St and NOTHING will change in the foreseeable future. NOTHING!”
More vile, demonic, sodomite, austere, anti-Human Orwellian insanity is ‘coming down the pike’.
Proles, you are screwed.
Whatever happens in regards to the so-called ‘Brexit”, the whole affair “WILL ALL GO ACCORDING TO PLAN”.
That is the Uber EL-ites’ plan.
Does ANYBODY actually think this had ANYTHING to do with the common serf/slave/prole/Human.
The whole affair has been nothing but a “mindfuk operation” for the People of Britain.
Time for some “Mark Twain” -“If voting made any difference they wouldn’t let us do it.”
No matter what happens from now until, and past 31 October (NICE date the EL-ites have chosen- Halloween- WTF- Really- Now you KNOW you’re being screwed with.)
‘Britain with Boris’ will do EXACTLY the same anti-Human vile insanity as was done by the previous PM lickspittles and clowns- May, Brown, Tony the Psycho, Major, Thatcher etc etc
I did find something comical- the author thinking that the 2 british Leopards have such power to put something like this into play. NOT a f n CHANCE.
This insanity came down from a much higher level on the Pyramid.
The Age of Insanity continues unabated, now with Boris the Clown on the Soapbox.
One thing is for sure… the worlds Uber El-ites are setting up something very special for October.
October Surprise anyone :-))
I think the real surprise is that it keeps being delayed, or was that not a surprise?
In the age of delay, then obstruct, politicians are able to reverse any decisions made, not only by their seniors of the past, but by the citizens of the present, until enough time has passed that the original intent is long forgotten and the ever present “what have you done for my party lately” is the head line of the day.
By not allowing the brexit, you are not allowing the citizens their voice by vote, this much becomes unacceptable, so it must allowed, yet under what circumstances is the only question that remains.
Hope all is well.
To answer your question, it being a “surprise”… That would be ‘No’.
Its ALL a GAME… to be played out and harvested for results. I have seen this sick ‘Reality Show’ too many times.
It is called Hegelian Dialect.
You can bet your a$$ Tavistock IHS is evolved in this ‘mindfuk op’.
“Delay/obstruct” is a tactic, and yes, it works…has for centuries. Thus ‘they’ keep utilizing it.
As to your last paragraph, I think you missed the entire point of my post.
“Allowing” or not, the People do NOT have a voice. They are being played.
If the Plan is to not allow “Brexit” then that is how it will be…the People be damned. And the Uber El-ites will HAVE A PLAN in place in order to take maximum advantage of the situation they have cause… “Game Theory”.
Heardin ‘goy’…sorry cattle. Its done all the time.
Now if I have misunderstood your comment and your point is to “allow” Brexit by the Uber EL-ites in order to try and maintain the illusion that ‘the People have a say’ in Britain, I would agree.
Having said that, this ‘outcome’ would be only one feather (result) in the desire “Dovetail Effect” of the operation. This Intel/Psy-Operation is massive, literally a world-wide operation. Multi-tiered, multi-facetted… and a major linchpin into the next phase of “The Great Game”.
If I have read “Big Zig” and his old bosses correctly…could the EU and NATO be next (Completion date 2030?)
Personally “Brexit” became a yawn fest just months after the “vote”…just when all the stupid BS started spewing out of 10 Downing.
The ONLY thing I am interested in now… is “All Hallows Eve”.
Add in the insane “POTUS Reality Show” starting Orangeman ‘Trumplestein the Clown’, a host of vile, idiotic brain-dead bobbleheads, a ‘Demoncrat’, an “Oktober Surprise” … and I would say the ‘witches and wizards’ are “cooking” something special for Mankind.
Health and Happiness.
Do you know that Bulgaria is in Europe? Or do you need to insult Bulgarians in accordance with the long standing British Imperial tradition?
I have seen it while reading, too.
But when you read the sentence again you see that Nick means the opposite as one could understand in the first moment.
He does not write “Pakistanis, Bulgarians AND Botswanas” but FOR Botswanas.
Moreover, I think to know that Nick loves Eastern Europe quite a lot. You should eventually consider inviting him to Bulgaria.
It doesn’t matter where a person is from, but what is the content of his character. We were all in Africa not long ago, and share 98% of our genes with bonobos.
Some people more closely related to bonobos than others.
Thanks for the compliment.
Absolutely no insult was intended to Bulgarians. It’s a simple fact that many have come to live and work in Britain since Bulgaria joined the EU, and that once Britain leaves fewer will do so and that Africans and Asians will come instead.
The influx of huge numbers of East European workers has been resented by many British workers, but from a demographic point of view it’s been a blessing.
For Britain, that is! The emigration of hundreds of thousands of young people is a social, economic, cultural and demographic disaster for the nation’s of eastern Europe.
I’m very fond of Bulgaria; a couple of years ago I spent several days with Bulgarian patriots patrolling their border with Turkey against illegal migrant infiltration. Good, brave and hospitable people!
Nick, this is basically the way I see it. Britain suffers from “Commonwealth gig”. No matter what happens the “brown” members have the doors open, while the “white” Europeans “may” have to leave (only if they do not have the citizenship).
The new BJ cabinet is composed of 22 members, 18 of which are affiliated to the CFI ( Conservative Friends of Israel), the right wing of the Jewish lobby, the LBI (Labour Friends of Israel) being the left one. Since the 17th century, Britain is under Jewish “influence”, and today, prides herself in perpetuating the “old tradition” of circumcising the Royal Princes. Nothing can happen in Britain, that does not serve the globalist interests of that minority.
The 1952 book of Captain Ramsay gives you the historical background:
Indeed,in the light of the outrageous anti semitism attack on Jeremy Corbyn by the Deep state,Labour should have come out fighting and exposed just how many Labour MPs are in that friends of Israel group,including Tom Watson,just who the hell are these people loyal to?
I read a delicious expose of Tony Bliar and his Zionazi controller ‘Lord’ Michael ‘Cashpoint’ Levy, some time ago. A visitor to Bliar’s office, when he was PM, was astounded by the manner in which Levy treated Bliar, the PM, like an underling, ordering him about, and telling him to be quiet while he was on the phone. Still, Bliar was very richly rewarded on retirement for his service, particular the destruction of Iraq and genocide of its people, a prime Zionazi objective, and Cashpoint easily survived the ‘Money for Honours’ scandal with the police finding nothing out of the ordinary.
Is this Nick Griffin of BNP fame? As an Irish Nationalist, I agree with you sir, enemies as we may on some days be.
Boris is imagining he can and perhaps still is just about keeping the Conservative party together…..that above all else is his life motivation taking advantage of it for his self purposes when it suits him….despite the recent promises that appear to provide for some kind of revitalisation of the country….Boris the sham flim flam man…….I doubt very much he has had some kind of conversion…only some kind of public image reinvention curtesy of his new girlfriend.
I have always maintained that either, brexit will not happen, or it will not resemble what the ‘people’ voted for when they voted in the referendum. That’s basically what the man said…so we arrived at the same conclusion coming from different directions, and with varying depths of knowledge of, an experience in, history, current affairs and politics.
Not surprising really…its all speculation anyway…there are not that many real possibilities.
The most beautiful aspect of such speculation is that if/when brexit happens (i.e. 31st October or whenever) it will not be possible to discern THE TRUTH anyway since it does not exist. There will be the accepted MSM propaganda, our subjective opinions, and a lot of fake news sprinkled on top. The dogs will bark and the caravan will move on.
This is as always: there is no need to get excited about it. Excited people are much more likely to take their eye off the ball – to get distracted!
In sum: I think THEY are stealing from US!
This article is all over the place. A contradictory babble of nothingness. What a shambles the UK is in if it can elect somebody as confused and out of their depth as this lol
I wish it was funny.
It was a veritable ‘parson’s egg’.
Surprised the author hasn’t mentioned Scotland which will be an unpredictable factor in the case of Brexit. Scots are supposed to be pro-EU and unhappy with the idea of Brexit. If this is true they are likely to push for another independence referendum and they may well win it this time. Although independence is an odd word to use in this case, given that they would be voting to remain in the UE whose goal is to dissolve the sovereignty of all its member states, and they are already halfway there.
Should we really pity the crew who worked hard to decommission their own ‘HMS Britannia’?
Thank you for this aticle; finally I found some much needed, reasonable explanation for what is going on in GB.
The Brutish colonial scum deserve whatever happens to them. It’s only because the EU is vile that I supported Brexit. With luck it will lead to the disintegration of Brutain, which is excellent. And then the Brutes can survive on whatever’s left of the riches they looted from us for two hundred years.
The US sponsored side is going to Brexit quickly to close EU borders, imo for a then planned continental war. They need an aircraft carrier in Europe, and certainly one without millions of war refugees.
very good (yet very sad) piece by Nick Griffin
I agree with most of this.
What are “Christian Values”?
Looking up some of the people recruited into the British New Establishment, and Nick Griffin’s article, makes for a Le-Carre novel, but one that could well be non-fiction.
I well remember Nick Griffins letter from the Syrian Parliament, but assisted by Nick that stopped the British Parliament [and NATO] doing to Syria, what they did to Libya.
Any hopes of regaining control of our borders through ‘Brexit’ have been nullified by our treacherous ‘government and ‘deep state’ signing us up to the UN’s Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration’ last December. This is why all of our Newsfaker/propganda sheets only refer to those currently crossing the channel in an unorthodox way as ‘MIGRANTS’!
Shocking to see in print, the Actual Reality of the Uk today.