by Andrew Korybko
All the chaos that’s been unleashed in Eurasia can be attributed to the existential battle between the Exceptionalists and the Integrationalists, represented respectively by the unipolar and multipolar worlds. A lot has lately been written about the emerging triangle of defensive and incorporative interests between Russia, China, and Iran, yet not much has been published about the offensive alliance between American Exceptionalism, Zionism, and Wahhabism, the three ideologies dedicated to dividing the diverse multipolar forces in Eurasia and perpetuating unipolar dominance. The aim of the piece is not at all to demonize the identities mistakenly caught up in blanket association with these ideologies (Westerners, Jews, Muslims), but rather to illustrate how the most extreme strains of thought tangentially associated with them have become the most destabilizing forces in Eurasia, and how the ‘unholy alliance’ between these three has emerged as the primary driver of conflict in the supercontinent.
The Three Exceptions
A brief definition of the three instigators of instability is as follows:
Adherents of this ideology hold an ingrained belief that the country’s unique geography and place on the historical timeline endows its leadership with the right to proselytize (even militarily, if need be) its governing, economic, and social models all across the world.
Proponents assert that Jews have a special relationship with God and an historical imperative to recreate the Biblical Israeli state, which thus gives their leadership the right to do whatever is deemed to be in their global interests.
Unquestioning and fervent conviction in the “pureness” of this strain of Islamic interpretation emboldens its practitioners to commit whatever means of savagery and barbarism are necessary to create a global un-“Islamic State”.
These three ideologies share pivotal structural similarities that essentially make them separate faces of the same actor, a modern-day Cerberus, if one will. Here are the most important commonalities that tie them together:
The practitioners of these ideologies identify themselves as “special”, thus convincing themselves that they’re entitled to break established rules and enact a plethora of double standards in order to shape the world according to their design.
Each of these movements believes that their success is inevitable, and that it’s a question of “when” not “if” they succeed.
Accordingly, in order to facilitate their historical inevitability, they must partake in a global strategy designed to safeguard their interests and promote their core entities (the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, respectively).
Antagonism To Multipolarity:
By their very nature, none of these ideologies is compatible with multipolarity and the plurality of geopolitical thought, which is why they’ve been harnessed to come together as the Cerberus in attempting to halt and reverse this global trend.
One mustn’t make the mistake of forgetting that these movements are not representative of the majority of their blanket associates (Westerners [Europeans are subordinated as second-rate Exceptionalists under American tutelage], Jews, Muslims), although each ideological vanguard attempts to create the illusion that this is so in order to ‘justify’ and ‘legitimize’ its extreme minority control over affairs.
The Interplay Of Interests
The Cerberus is formed of three different faces that each espouse a different variation of seemingly incompatible Exceptionalism, but in reality they’re each complementary to one another’s long-term goal in defeating multipolarity. Per their shared hypocritical standards, the only inclusiveness allowed in their vision is the convergence of American Exceptionalism, Zionism, and Wahhabism as an ultra-exclusive unipolar super model. It will later be argued in another section that this unstable arrangement is a geo-ideological gambit that could seriously backfire against Zionism and Wahhabism, all to the US’ eventual geopolitical benefit (and perhaps even through its own hand).
Before getting to that point, however, it’s necessary to chronicle how the convergence of interest between these three ideologies came to be in the first place and what interplay of interests lays at the crossroads of their strategic cooperation. While it may be possible to document such examples prior to World War II, it wasn’t until its aftermath that the relationships really began to come to light and were activated on a massive regional scale throughout the entire Mideast, initiating the destructive processes that have accelerated in the present day.
The American Exceptionalist-Zionist Alliance:
The US emerged from World War II with the capacity to extend its military reach all across Eurasia, but one regional theater (aside from the Soviet Bloc) posed a noticeable problem for its penetration, and that was the Mideast. The US had vested geopolitical interests in shattering Arab unity after World War II (partly in order to preempt the possible creation of a pro-Soviet supranational entity) and creating a geopolitical perch that could allow it to practice a permanent proxy intervention role in picking apart each regional payer, hence the creation of Israel and the formalization of the American Exceptionalist-Zionist strategic convergence. The global significance of the Mideast for American Exceptionalism’s grand strategy will be explained in the following section, but what’s important to understand at this juncture is that American Exceptionalism’s empowerment and support of Zionism was meant to create a proxy partner that had a shared interest in militarily unraveling Arab unity, which is exactly what the ultimate result of the Arab-Israeli wars happened to be.
After the Arab coalitions were defeated, the military component of Arab unity was neutralized, the importance of which cannot be understated. Only through Arab unity could there be a chance of defeating Israel and accordingly remove the US’ intergenerational perch in the Mideast, the geostrategic connecting region between Europe and Asia (and equally positioned to exert influence on both, if properly applied). Israel, unlike any other American allies, is directly dependent on the US for both its creation and existence, and is hence much more reliable as a long-term committed ally (both ideologically and politically) than any other country. The US needs Israel’s strategic location and regional military contracting services to keep Arab governments perpetually weak and divided, while Israel needs the US’ full-spectrum support to continue to exist, thus explaining the intensive depth of support that each entity has for the other.
Despite militarily cracking Arab unity, Israel is inherently incapable of destroying the bond that connects Arab people, hence why another Exceptionalist component had to be brought into the mix in order to achieve this and remove any possibility that an Arab coalition could ever threaten Israel (and by extension, the US’ premier Eurasian super base) again.
The Wahhabist Weapon:
Saudi Arabia’s official ideology, Wahhabism, was thus selected as the destructive ideology necessary to tear apart Arab unity and sow irreconcilable identity discord among the Arab people for generations. It placed its victims on the horns of a major dilemma, in which they were forced to choose whether they were secular pan-Arabs along the model of Nasser or extremist pan-Islamists like the Saudi Kings. While Nasser preached the importance of a progressive republican form of government, the Saudis strictly supported authoritarian monarchism, thus putting the two Mideast ideologies at odds with one another and motivating the Wahhabis to find external support in eliminating the most pressing threat to their ideological existence.
It was through this imperative, namely the challenge that secular pan-Arab republicanism posed to extremist pan-Islamic authoritative monarchism, that the Wahhabis decided to join the American Exceptionalist-Zionist alliance which also was dedicated to defeating the Saudis’ ideological rivals. The Wahhabist virus is such that it’s engineered to destabilize secular pan-Arab governments by forcing each citizen to reconsider their most basic identity, thus theoretically making most of these countries’ citizens vulnerable to its allure. On top of that, not only does Wahhabism preach the need to overthrow secular governments, but it also carries with it militant takfirism that leads to sectarian warfare. Thus, Wahhabism is uniquely positioned to divide Arabs both from their secular governments and also from themselves, thereby presenting the ultimate divisive ideology to ever serve the interests of the American Exceptionalist-Zionist alliance.
While Wahhabism is known for its unflinching ideological hatred, just like the other two Exceptionalist ideologies, it also partakes in major hypocritical standards, namely in the surprise moderation of its policies towards Israel and the US. It holds out the tantalizing hint of conducting an eventual religious war against Israel but notably never takes steps to actualize it. Instead, it focuses all of its time and energy on dividing the Mideast in as many ways as possible (ergo the takfirism that defines Wahhabism), meaning that any slogans against Israel are purely just that, and are designed simply to spread a marketing campaign for more naïve recruits. At the same time, certain Wahhabist elements have a tendency to go rogue and let ideology get the better of their externally imposed ‘practicality’ (whether by design or accident), which can open up either ‘opportunities’ or vulnerabilities for the American Exceptionalists depending on the context (to be explained in a later section).
The Significance Of The War On Syria:
Considering all of the aforementioned agreements in strategic focus endemic to the American Exceptionalist-Zionist-Wahhabist alliance (hereto referred to as Cerberus), the War on Syria becomes what may aptly be described as the most pivotal Eurasian resistance struggle today. Other than the fact that all three heads of Cerberus are bitterly engaged in mauling this Mideast nation and its people to pieces, Syria represents the last vestige of secular pan-Arab governance due to the ideological foundations of the Baath Party. This qualifies it as the most Resistant & Defiant state in Israel’s nearest vicinity and by itself is reason enough for Cerberus’ enemies (thenceforth referred to as the Herculean Coalition [the anchors of which are Russia, China, and Iran] after the Greek hero that defeated Cerberus) to support its democratically elected government. If Cerberus is successful in slaughtering Syria, then this would herald in a Dark Age for the Mideast that would turn the entire region into a launching pad for further destabilization into the Eurasian interior, and thus, expressly target the geographic vulnerabilities of the Herculean Coalition.
There’s a reason that all of Cerberus’ three-headed interests coincide in the Mideast, and it’s not simply because two of the three ideologies emerged in this region. Rather, there are greater geopolitical underpinnings as to why Cerberus focuses so intently on the area, since just as the mythical beast itself guards the gates of hell in Greek folklore, in Eurasian geostrategy, it’s at the forefront of the gate to the supercontinent, being specifically positioned to exert influence on Europe, Asia, and even Africa if need be. It’s not to say that Eurasia is hell, but instead to emphasize that in both cases, Cerberus occupies a position of access, the mythological of which was defensive while the geopolitical equivalent is offensive. Modern-day Cerberus is intent on using its location as a springboard for further attacks into Eurasia in an effort to destroy the Herculean Coalition, and its strategy closely follows the dictates of British strategist Halford Mackinder.
This individual prominently pioneered the field of geostrategy and geopolitics over a century ago through this work “The Geopolitical Pivot of History”, in which he famously stipulated that:
“Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland:
Who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island:
Who rules the World-Island commands the World.”
He was absolutely correct in ascertaining that command of the Heartland, largely identified with contemporaneous Central Asia, was pivotal in exerting influence all throughout Eurasia, but he neglected to consider additional approaches for controlling this crucial piece of geopolitical real estate. At the time it seemed as though Eastern Europe was the only gateway to achieving this, but increasingly, it appears as though the Mideast can serve just as much, if not more, of a facilitating role given its Eurasian Balkans credentials of demographic chain-reaction fragmentation.
Brzezinski’s theoretical innovation to Mackinder’s axiom is that command and control do not have to be direct or even require a physical presence, but that given the innate ability of the center to influence the periphery, that massive destabilization in the Heartland (be it through Islamic terrorist insurgency, state collapse, humanitarian crises, and/or a combination thereof plus additional factors) can automatically radiate outwards. In today’s world, this means that asymmetrical threats indirectly instigated by out-of-regional actors such as Cerberus can lead to simultaneous challenges for the three main members of the Herculean Coalition, not only putting them on the severe strategic defensive, but actually endangering their existence if allowed to grow out of control (as purposefully envisioned by Cerberus). In the early 20th century, Mackinder may have thought of state armies rolling through Eastern Europe en route to taking control of the Heartland, but in the early 21st century, it’s more likely that this will take the form of terrorist brigades originating in or having acquired their battle experience in the Mideast that happen to ‘pop up’ in the Heartland without any direct links to state sponsors.
The Mideast is therefore the fulcrum of Eurasian-African (in)stability, and thus, any entity that controls it can export asymmetrical and conventional force in near-equidistant direction to penetrate the heart of Africa, the heart of Europe (or even Eastern Europe, for that matter), and the Eurasian Heartland (the key continental gateway to East Asia). Such a geopolitical understanding of power and force projection adds an updated component to Mackinder and Brzezinski’s theoretical contributions and explains the reasoning behind the Mideast-centric application of Cerberus’ wrath.
Cerberus isn’t limited to only the Mideast, although that’s where the majority of its activities and strategic focus are concentrated. One can actually identify its involvement in Europe and Asia as well, which will be explored in this section.
Bark, Bite, Beg:
Prior to commencing the overview, Cerberus’ pattern in Europe and Asia needs to be conceptually outlined so as to draw more of the reader’s attention to it. Basically, each of its three heads fulfills the interchanging role of barking (threatening, fear mongering), biting (attacking), and begging (lobbying) in order to push its collective interest. Let’s look at how they work in practice.
The US uses NATO to control the continent, and it bitterly barks at its puppies any time they’re reluctant to follow its lead in whatever the issue of the day may be. The US also barks loudly about the so-called “Russian threat” without providing any evidence of what there is to be scared of in the first place. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and its Wahhabi zombies are being deployed to the Balkans and select Western European countries to carry out strategic terrorist attacks designed to take a bite out of continental security and stabilization, as well as to prod the US’ NATO puppies into taking Washington’s ‘suggested’ courses of action on various topics. Finally, Israel rounds up the trio by lobbying the continent and its key political and social figures in order to gather as much financial, political, and normative support for Cerberus as possible. The implicit threat is that a rejection of support for Cerberus will translate into more barking by the US and biting by the Saudis, meaning that it’s best to feed the begging mouth in order to avoid the unpleasant consequences from the other two heads.
Cerberus has only lately turned its three heads to the East, but it’s been relatively successful in such a short timeframe. The US has been barking incessantly about China ever since Hillary Clinton announced the Pivot to Asia in 2011, and its doing this with the intent of scaring the ‘little dogs’ surrounding it into a NATO-modeled alliance of anti-Chinese containment. As a means of deepening the US’ security engagement with each of these members, especially in the case of Thailand and the Philippines, Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabi proxies occasionally carry out terrorist attacks to ‘justify’ an increased and intensified US presence and/or strategic oversight, and this pattern is only expected to increase with the creation of the globally oriented un-“Islamic State”. Israel’s role, while largely muted, is disproportionately significant to its size, in that its begging efforts appear to be on the verge of successfully lobbying India over to the side of Cerberus. Israel has had breakthrough relations with India since the rise of the Modi government, as the new ‘multipolar’ Prime Minister is reluctant to become too overtly close with the US and of course hates the Saudis and their Wahhabi terrorism (and political support of Pakistan). Thus, Israel represents the perfect solution for Cerberus to penetrate the subcontinental hegemon and pursue its partners’ shared interests.
Cerberus’ home theater is characterized by a dynamic interplay of ever-changing and less clearly defined roles dependent on the specific circumstances at hand. Each of its three heads vigorously cycles through the available roles as is necessary in order to advance the allied entity’s shared goals. One example might see the US barking about the un-“Islamic State” while Saudi-supported agents provide the on-the-ground bite to justify the fear America was mongering, whereas another one could see Israel and the Saudis barking about the ‘threat’ of Saddam Hussein while the US begs for an international coalition prior to its devastating bite. A future scenario that’s not too unlikely might see Israel barking about alleged Iranian non-compliance with the forthcoming nuclear deal, while the US begs the world to support the Arab NATO’s Lead-From-Behind punitive bite against Tehran.
As mentioned near the beginning of the article, Cerberus is centered on an unstable geo-ideological foundation that might unexpectedly crack along its two major Zionist and Wahhabist fault lines. Both sides suspect that the other may turn on them one day, hence why they’re both eager to cultivate as privileged relations as possible with their American Exceptionalist sibling, which only works out to Washington’s prime strategic benefit. The Zionists are afraid of two scenarios: that the Wahhabi terrorists become strong enough on their own to disobey Riyadh and wage jihad against Israel outside of the US or Saudi Arabia’s control; or that Saudi Arabia will one day betray Israel and directly order its terrorist proxies to attack it in order to fully complete the un-“Islamic State”. Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, is apprehensive of the Zionist Yinon Plan and fully aware of Ralph Peters’ “Blood Borders” map and the New York Times’ “How 5 Countries Could Become 14” suggestions, all of which deal with the eventual dismemberment of the kingdom. Pure Zionism and pure Wahhabism cannot coexist due to these existential contradictions, hence why a falling out is inevitable if Cerberus eliminates the Herculean Coalition (the main force that glues it together).
If they turn on each other prematurely before the Coalition can be conquered, then both Zionism and Wahhabism open themselves up to being separately defeated in a devastating counter-attack, which would then lead to the disintegration of American Exceptionalist influence in Eurasia. Therefore, the nature of the gambit is that they can prolong their falling out until afterwards, or that the US is able to somehow balance relations between them to the point of precluding such a scenario, which is the policy that it currently practices. Washington regularly intimates that it could throw additional weight towards one or the other and subsequently disrupt the delicate balance keeping the peace between its three heads. It’s not serious enough to do so at this point, of course, and all Exceptionalist sides understand that they need the other in order to continue surviving until the reactionary Herculean Coalition can be dealt with, but the prospect of such a suicidal security dilemma succeeds in scaring Israel and Saudi Arabia to the point of unquestionable cooperation within the Cerberus framework (for now, at least).
The only alternative to Cerberus is the eventual removal of the Exceptionalist Ideological minority from each captive entity, which would see the American Exceptionalists ousted from the US, the Zionists from Palestine, and the Wahhabis from Saudi Arabia, thus leading to a change in their foreign policies and internal organization. None of this means that these entities are facing geopolitical elimination, as only the minority Exceptionalist Ideologies and their practitioners are under existential threat of losing anything at all (namely their power and ‘legitimacy’), but it is this fear of those currently in power that desperately motivates them to aggressively summon Cerberus in indefinitely prolonging their unipolar hegemony. Ironically, only through their theoretical ‘success’ in destroying the Herculean Coalition do the odds dramatically increase that they may be geopolitically eliminated, as the aforementioned ideological contradictions between Zionist and Wahhbist Exceptionalists inevitably means that they’ll militarily clash in a duel to the death someday. Even in the ‘best case’ scenario of a victory over the Herculean Coalition and a fragile cold peace between these two incompatible camps, there’s no guaranteeing that the American Exceptionalists won’t purposely tip the strategic balance towards one side or the other in order to recreate its characteristic cauldron of chaos in the Mideast perfectly suited for its grand geopolitical goals.
The unipolar Cerberus mutant of American, Zionist, and Wahhabist Exceptionalism is the true reason for Eurasia’s destabilization, and only the Resistant & Defiant Herculean Coalition of Russia, China, and Iran is capable of pacifying it. Right now the fate of Eurasia appears to be foreshadowed by the fate of Syria in resisting Cerberus, in that its success or failure would have game-changing reverberations all throughout the supercontinent. If Syria and her people are successful in repelling the onslaught, then it would safeguard the Eurasian interior to a much stronger degree than if it failed, and it would also begin to turn the tide against Cerberus. However, if Syria happens to fall, then Cerberus will waste no time in launching a rapid and aggressive asymmetrical blitzkrieg into the Eurasian Heartland, one which is intended to divide the Herculean Coalition and defeat the champions of multipolarity.
One must always remember, though, that it’s not Westerners, Jews, or Muslims who are in any way to blame for what Cerberus does, but instead the most radical ideological components of these societies (unrepresentative of the vast majority, thus making them extreme outliers) which have seized control of key states and are now using their host entities to engage in a global proxy war against the multipolar forces of inclusion and integration. Cerberus’ unipolar victory wouldn’t mean peace, however, since it’s guaranteed that two of its three heads will eventually cannibalize one another, after which the American Exceptionalist one, unscathed by the fraternal infighting, can finish off its weakened surviving sibling and lay full claim to what were thought to have been shared global spoils (but which are really impossible to divide among two Exceptionalists as mutual incompatible as the Zionists and Wahhabists). That being the case, the only way to preclude such a gloomy global forecast is for the Herculean Coalition to succeed in saving Syria from Cerberus before the latter’s aggressive pan-continental campaign and post-‘victory’ self-destruction engulf the entire landmass.
[eng subs] Donetsk Victory Parade 2015 [full]
The origins are a little more complex. Britain planned the Iranian coup. Mossadeq threw them out. He was taken by surprise when the CIA joined in. After meeting Kermit Roosevelt, Eisenhower, said it all “sounded like a dime novel”. Eisenhower stopped the French, British and Israeli attack on Suez.
Britain forged the covert Saudi-Israeli alliance in Yemen in the ’60s. Duff Hart-Davis’ book The War That Never Was reminds of this. Kennedy was vehemently opposed to them. So we have the strange events of 1963. Macmillan suddenly resigned for health reasons (although he was to live a very long life, and became very critical of Thatcher). Alec Douglas-Home took his place, and had a blistering row with Kennedy on the phone on 20 November 1963. Armed with a report from the intelligence wing of the CIA, Kennedy accused him of lying about his terror campaign, and demanded that he wind it up. Sir Alec pretended not to know anything. Promising to make enquiries, he said he would ring back in two days, which he did as the bullets smashed through Kennedy’s head. Johnson reversed American policy in Britain’s favour, and ever after the US was a servant of Israel (the fate of USS Liberty being a case in point). Tears flooded down Macmillan’s face at the dedication of the Runnymede memorial. It was here that the Anglo-Zionists took power, and the transnational term is fiendishly accurate. Other outcomes were possible, but were drowned in Kennedy’s blood.
Thanks for the info in your comment. It proves yet again that the number of important details needed learning is immense and almost neverending. Where did you get the info about the JFK/Douglas-Home “row”?
Thank you, an excellent article.
Much to digest and a keeper.
The wahhabbis in Syria have been forced/persuaded to work together and have now been provided with us arms/missiles that seem to have made a big difference to the war there.
Will Russia/China step in here to turn the tide if required? If the Wahhabis take Syria for a base, it will be like a termite nest in the foundations of both countries.
re: Peter “Will Russia/China step in here” Keep you eye on Hezbollah. Saker posted an interesting speech ( not too long winded ) by its leader a few days ago in which there was analysis about what is happening in Yemen and Syria.
Thanks for our insightful contribution.
To bullies, an olive branch is seen as a sign of weakness. I hope the merging countries will be able to project enough power onto PA 1600’s computer screens to reign it in.
I don’t see the difference, both sides want to convert Hindus.
I see the dharmic nations, from Bharat to Japan to Han China uniting and launching an allied assault to take back c Asia and Uttarpat.
China even thawing on Tibet, because we don’t forget that a large reason for the white Chrostian world’s ascension was due to manuscripts stolen from Tibet. They were to be safeguarded from melechas, but I guess one strain got them.
Re: ” …we don’t forget that a large reason for the white Chrostian world’s ascension was due to manuscripts stolen from Tibet. They were to be safeguarded from melechas…”
what does this mean?
Just a side question… I have seen this ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾ।।ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਹਿ।। on Internet a few times, and am wondering, what does it mean? Is that Sanskrit, or some other language perhaps? Thank you in advance!
no that is not a noble sanskrit language.
that is a vulgar punjabi language much cruder and unsophisticated of all languages in India.
According to Reuters, China has now become the largest oil importer.
Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi was on a high profile visit to China and other Asian countries in April when he announced near record Saudi oil production and said he was “very positive” about continued strong demand from China.
Until pipelines from Russia get built.
Good article. However, I must disagree as to the nature of the battle between Cerberus and the Herculeans. This is all governmed by a larger picture involving international bankers – Zionist Bankers, if you will. The Cerberus/Herculean conflict is a typical Hegelian Dialectic strategy employed by the internationalists, who despise all of them and work unceasingly towards a one-world government and a globalised economy totally under their control.
All three Cerberus heads will eventually be sacrificed after the Herculean unity has been destroyed. At least I believe that is their ultimate aim. They will fail. But they will come close, and there will be much pain and suffering among many people in the meantime.
To leave out the internationalist bankers is to completely ignore the real game.
The root of the Exceptionalist mania lies in Judaism, in my opinion. Judaism was created as an operating system for a group of Canaanites in the second millennium BCE, based on eternal antagonism towards and exploitation of all those not of the chosen group. I would imagine that this sort of group psychology was common then, and throughout history, but the Jews, of course, differ from the others, because they have endured so long, influenced two other great religions, and through their early and continuing dominance of money lending and debt extraction have grown incredibly rich, and hence, in societies like the USA, corrupt to the very marrow and dominated by money power in every sphere of life, they have become quite dominant, despite their small numbers.
This xenophobic tendency is behind much of the strife that the Jews have encountered throughout history, in societies differing in place, time, religion, ethnicity, social arrangements etc.A tiny group, keeping to itself, treating all others as lesser beings, ruthlessly exploitative and nepotistic, will certainly incite hatred amongst some, perhaps many, of its victims or mere ‘inferiors’. It doesn’t take many such disgruntled individuals to launch a pogrom, particularly in times of social turmoil, or where the Jews have acted as rent and tax collectors for hated overlords. It doesn’t make pogroms or expulsions acceptable, but at least it doesn’t insult the intelligence as all the efforts by well-trained Sabbat Goy sycophants to establish reasons for such outbursts, where the Jews are NEVER responsible for ANY of the social tension, and are ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE entirely innocent of any wrong-doing themselves, do. Unfortunately Sabbat Goyim in the Western MSM are judged according to the enthusiasm of their sycophancy.
Judaic religious practises, like the genocides enthusiastically demanded and celebrated by Yahweh in the Book of Joshua and elsewhere, and religously celebrated every year at Purim and Passover, were readily adopted by various Christians over the centuries. One need only paint your victims as the descendants of the Midianites, Moabites, Jebusites and Amalek, to justify their extermination, whether it be indigenous natives in the Americas, or those who crossed themselves the wrong way during the Thirty Years War. Moreover first the English, then the Americans, took to fancying themselves the inheritors of the mantle of ‘God’s Chosen People’, an ironic impertinence given both countries’ subservience to their tiny Jewish minorities today. And Islam incorporated aspects of Judaism, in certain scriptures and exegeses,(particularly in vicious fanatic cults like Wahhabism, itself founded by a doenmeh, or crypto-Jew)that demand and justify hideous outbursts of murderous hatred like the Daash phenomenon. Of course, decent Jews, Christians and Moslems who put their humanity before their murderous religious xenophobia, have long abjured these doctrines, but they exist to today, in hideous religious and ideological fundamentalisms like the Likud cancer, the ultra-orthodox ‘settler’ Judaic Taliban, the Christian Zionist and Dominionist lunatics and Wahhabism.
The domination of the West by its Jewish Fifth Columns, realised through ruthless and relentless entryism and nepotism and concerted bribery and suborning of the human dross that makes up the Western political caste, has reached not only extraordinary levels, with the Holocaust deliberately engineered to become a quasi-State religion in the West (while ALL the victims of ALL other Holocausts, hecatombs, genocides and massacres are forgotten, often completely)and any and all criticism of the behaviour of any Jew anywhere banned as ‘antisemitic'(TM) bigotry, but extraordinarily dangerous levels. Not just for the millions being butchered in the Middle East in pursuit of Judaism’s latest Holy Genocide, the Oded Yinon horror, but for Jews themselves. Despite ferocious repression and suppression, endless slander, intimidation and censorship, the hatred for Israel and its racist viciousness and murderousness, is growing greater and greater. This will, regretably, be used by real Judeophobes to engender hatred of all Jews, just as Judeofascists have been behind the tsunami of Islamophobic venom that is inundating the West, and the repercussions could be dreadful. Yet Israel continues to career ever further Right, Satanyahu and his ilk utterly delighted to see any manifestation of Judeophobia because its justifies their innate and millennial antigoyite fury.
@ Mulga Mumblebrain
An excellent analysis.
Funny that most sikhs in india and usa think of jews as ideal to follow.
similar attitude ofcourse.
Yup, cheers, Mulga Mumblebrain.
Thank you mate. You saved me time. I was preparing to offer some observations along the same lines.
It must be said that the “Cerberus” has a long history behind it. It is not a new phenomenon. Zionism, Wahhabism, American Exceptionalism, are not extrinsic to Judaism, Islam, Judaized Christianity (Papo-Protestantism, “the great whore that sitteth upon many waters” – the Atlanticists in the most proper sense), as indeed the Shabbes goy try to push it down your throat. These are the culture media in which they strive. All are about a “chosen people” whose “manifest destiny” is to rule the world). Their alliance has been forged in the fight against the Christian Empire of Rome (Byzance) and its real successors (the Orthodox realms of the Balkans and Russia). From the start their goal was the conquest of Constantinople and of the shores of the Black Sea.
Certainly they would try an envelopment maneuver attacking Central Asia (that is the mission of the “Khalifate”, which revival starts with the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Hizb ut-Tahrir).
The Atlanticists represent not a cultural or ethnic type, so much, in my opinion, as a psychological type-the psychopath. They are morally insane, hence evil in action. They do not feel empathy or compassion for others, hence the ubiquity of mass murder and genocide in their aggressions. The Jews developed what I would call a group psychopathy millennia ago, probably as a survival strategy in violent times and places. No doubt it was an ethos shared by the other tribes of the Near East, and the peaceful, amicable experiments, if any, were probably not crowned with success. The Jews survived down through the ages, despite their group pathopsychology nearly always bringing them into conflict with non-Jews. They seem to have flourished best in al-Andaluce and Mesopotamia under strong, central, Governments that repressed their xenophobic tendencies and protected them from persecution. And hundreds of years of peace and inter-communal amity probably strengthened the less exclusivist and supremacist tendencies in Jewry. Nowadays, after the horror of the Nazi Judeocide, the hate-crazed, xenophobic, chauvinist and supremacist impulses are in total control, Israel run by Zionazi genocidists with an appetite for murder that mimics that of their Nazi persecutors, and similar types controlling Diaspora communities and running a constant campaign of abuse, threats and vilification against any goy (or ‘self-hating Jew’) who dares question any action by any Jew anywhere ie the so-called ‘antisemites’. It can only end in disaster, first moral, then existential, for Israel, its neighbours and the world.
“… Cerberus …”
“… I see new torments and new souls in pain
about me everywhere. Wherever I turn
away from grief I turn to grief again.
I am in the Third Circle of torments.
Here to all time with neither pause nor change
the frozen rain of Hell descends in torrents.
Huge hailstones, dirty water, and black snow
pour from the dismal air to putrefy
the putrid slush that waits for them below.
Here monstrous Cerberus, the ravening beast,
howls through his triple throats like a mad dog
over the spirits sunk in that foul paste. …”
[Dante, Inferno, Canto VI, transl. by John Chiardi]
There is much chewing on this to do, but I see difficulty in working only within this model. Another could be capitalism vs socialism, which forms a parallel of I, me vs. we, us, or authoritarian vs consensual democratic. Additionally, there are many other players to account for, who do not fit into this paradigm — the South — Latin America and Africa, for instance. So we must beware of simplifying seeing possibilities by using a simplified model, and consider other broader or more fundamental aspects, such as the psychology of the sociopaths involved.
There are also some base assumptions to examine, such as exactly how the Herculean side can or will be affected from the periphery, what they can do about it directly, individually and in concert, and what the effects of coalition and isolation from the West will be (stronger BRICS, independent financial and economic structures, growing resource and commerce independence) — and what effect such isolation of the West would be (what happens when EU runs low on gas and the US no longer has cheap chit from China to feed Walmart (with a nod to RD Wolff for that phrase)).
Other factors may be involved: what happens if China embarks on a massive energy conservation program (and as producing junk for the West shifts and rates building infrastructure levels off), switches to alternative sources (solar, wind, Russian gas or new Russian arctic sources, nuclear, tidal and hydro, bio, or some other technology), or finds a massive reserve within the country — cutting dependence on foreign oil sources).
So, what other models and possible analyses can be run concurrently with this one, and can we estimate the confidence we can place in each of them?
Hopefully Dutch of the Deep Resource is reading it, as I have some insight to share with him. Look at these pictures Dutch:
Dutch thinks the future of Russia in in EU because he saw flag of EU in bilateral meeting between Russia and Germany (Merkel and Putin yesterday). Perhaps he did not know that such is the protocol.
Forgot to add. Dutch might be secret Atlanticist. Everyone knows EU is an Anglozionist creation, and ruled over sovereign, former sovereign that is, nations of Europe by Anglo appointed bureaucrats. There is no sovereign power in continental Europe anymore. Hasn’t been since WW2.
Since departure of Deleors as EU president the Eu has been run by English saboteurs and their appintees like traitor barrasso.
After Deep Resource clear islamofobic tendencies, I switch to Global Research to get a coherence and unbiased view on the different cultures in the world.
He’s very good at determining the trends, or understanding what the future is about to bring though. Not many people are able to notice the trends, sense the changes in the wind the future brings, let alone understand them. But he for the better part I think does.
Not everything he calls or envisions will come to be, but some will, and this part in particular I think will definitely come to be. It’s already happening as it is. :o)
Feng, Yes, I think Globalresearch,ca is peerless. It has great searchable archives for researching most anything, too.
Since you like globalresearch, I think you’d like nsnbc too– especially the articles by Christof Lehmann. Also searchable.
I find the definition of Zionism rather strange. The focus of Zionism is not international but parochial – It’s an inward focus on Eretz Israel, the land that God gave to Abraham Isaac and Jacob.
You may not agree with it, but it is nothing to do with international adventurism, neo-conservatism or regime change in far-off places.
Why would we not just blame those behaviours and movements for the evil and mayhem they bring, instead of trying to stretch the definition of Zionism to implicate it?
Zionism was about getting rid of the Jews from Europe, from the point of view of Judeophobes and those discomfited by Judaic nepotism and predation. The ‘Christian Zionists’ who go back as far as Cromwell (so I’ve been assured) wanted the Jews back in the Holy Land in order to precipitate the End Times, and the destruction, amongst many others, of the Jews who refuse to convert. With such ‘friends’..And Jewish Zionists were partly sentimentalists (and racist, European, colonists, for whom the indigenous were ‘human dust’ to be blown away) and partly those who wished to establish a redoubt from which Jews could practise their ‘entrepreneurial’ skills safely. As a result Israel features highly, not just in high-tech, military, surveillance and Internet industries, but in pornography of all kinds, human trafficking, human organ trafficking, ‘blood diamonds’, drug trafficking, particularly Ecstasy and amphetamines etc. Jewish malcreants need only reach sanctuary in Eretz Yisrael, and they are more or less safe from extradition. And much of the loot pillaged from the destruction of the USSR ended up in Israel, thanks to that legendary Jewish ‘business acumen’ that exemplars like Khodorkovsky displayed. It goes without saying that predatory, exploitative and extractive enterprise is facilitated greatly when you look on your victims as ‘two-legged animals’. After all, as Rabbi Eli Ben-Dahan, just appointed by Satanyahu as Israeli Deputy Defence Minister, responsible for administering the civil dimension of the eternal Occupation of the Palestinians, observed, ‘(Palestinians) are beasts. They are not human’. August 1, 2013, and, for the other goyim, ‘A Jew always has a much higher soul than a gentile, even if he is a homosexual’, December 27, 2013. Pity the poor Palestinians, under jack-boots worn by the likes of this.
Anonym at 20_15
Sorry you are wrong.
most of the looted wealth to the tune of one thousand billion dollars ended up in english banks at london -just like all of the stolen wealth being invited to be brought to london by the theiving british regime.
@stretch the definition of Zionism
Who was stretching it? Was Ben Gurion a Zionist?
In Life Magazine and Look Magazine of the 16th of January 1962, David Ben Gurion, Zionist stated, while still in office:
“With the exception of the U.S.S.R. as a federated Eurasian State, all other continents will become united in a world alliance at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations will build a shrine of the prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah…”
Thank you Andrew for this lovely piece. Pictures are worth a thousand words and your idea of the Cerberus is no exception.
The use of symbols helps integrate various concepts into a whole and they remain in your memory long after the retention of the specific words has faded away. Sufis used pictures and teaching stories to explain concepts beyond the current capacity of their students. Someone interested could start with the stories of Mullah Nasruddin, the embodiment of the wise fool, through the stories collected by Idries Shah.
So far I found three symbols that meet the criteria for a better understanding of current events:
1) The Russian bear that will end as a stuffed animal on the wall no matter how it behaves, as famously told by Vladimir Putin. The picture is simple but very realistic and available to a large audience.
2) The China-Russia Double Helix from Larchmonter445. A profound and meaningful explanation of the complex relationship between Russia and China that can be applied to current events.
3) And now the unipolar Cerberus mutant of American, Zionist, and Wahhabist Exceptionalism against the Herculean Coalition of Russia, China, and Iran by Andrey Korybko. A piece of genius from a great thinker.
There are several other pictures and publications available, but once you put these three pictures together, you reach a level of understanding that is closer to the reality of current events than several extensive publications.
Of course one can always find faults with a picture or a story. The point is that no picture or concept or exposé can fully reflect the reality of the truth, and a picture is but a step in the right direction. Understanding comes after: the Ah! Ha! moment of the Revelation.
Continue building your Christmas tree of knowledge Saker, It is decorated with diamonds of truth and illuminated with the light of knowledge. (OK. I am becoming romantic now, time to go out and clean up the garden…)
Thank you so much!
Very brilliant article. This symbolism of the three-headed dog of Hell and Herculean Coalition helps all to understand the dynamics without ideological verbiage. Excellent presentation.
I agree completely that Syria is the prize. The life or death of the government seems to be dependent on whether Turkey commits fully to joining the Biters.
Modulating its power in the Herculean Coalition until recently has been China. But with news of a possible Chinese base in Djibouti, Mediterranean naval maneuvers with Russia, and the crucial liberating of Iran from sanctions, China seems to have decided to engage using the PLA and the full weight of its international status dead center of this conflict. China is feeling its way, new to the turmoil you describe.
The future is in the hands of Putin and Xi and how skillfully they work Iran/Hezbollah and India.
It is their initiatives that will draw out the Cerberus and slay it.
This is a very important presentation, Andrew. Thank you.
Thank you, I really appreciate it!! :-)
The British Empire created Wahhabi Terrorism in 1710AD to Destroy Islam and Justify a Global State.
Saudi Arabia was given to Ibn Saud at the time of Lawrence of Arabia by the Globalists and became Wahhabist – Taliban, Isis.
Saudi Arabia has funded Salafism and Wahhabism Worldwide – three billion dollars a year since 1975.
By David Livingstone Global Research, July 19, 2006
Exceptionalism is a slippery word.
Mel Brooks did a routine called The 2,000 Year Old Man, which included two gems.
‘One was the National Anthem he sung: Cave 76 is the best; all the rest can go to hell.’
The other is the difference between tragedy and comedy: If I cut my finger that’s tragedy; if the other guy is eaten by a tiger that’s comedy.
All countries think themselves exceptional in some way and build a national identity. Russia maintains exceptionalism too. The difference is aggressiveness and sense of entitlement and lust for empire. England, France, Spain, etc., went through an imperialistic stage, and many countries still have imperialistic undercurrents within it. Some countries went through that and got over it — and their exceptionalism is not as ‘extroverted’ as it once was (compare national psyches in terms of individual personality: extroversion vs introversion, narcissism vs unselfishness or generativity — see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trait_theory , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_psychology , etc.).
Compare with transactional analysis, scripts and role playing, etc. and extrapolate from individual and family psychology to soacial, or national psychology and collective consciousness (or collective unconscious), Jungian analysis, etc.
Problematic is that nations generally depend on ‘leaders’ rather than consensual participative democracy, and ‘leaders’ are often those who are most psychopathic and manipulative — the most effective psychopaths (and gangsters) of the society, who are able to take advantage of social dissatisfaction, schisms, and cultural biases, if cultural strengths, or circumstances, do not keep them in check. The US, for example, was always ‘exceptinal’ and imperialistic, but was not a major disturbance for most of the world while it engaged in local aggressiveness, theft, and exploitation. When it grew in power, and began to run out of local victims it expanded it’s visions of conquest.
Nations and geopolitics, then, should be seen also in models and in terms of national character, natural resources, military, economic, and political power, authoritarianism, national psychic health, and, in general, ‘national personality traits’ in a given time frame. The interactions of inmates of the asylum need to be understood (such as Crazy Saddam and Iraq in juxtapostion to Crazy Israel, Crazy US, etc. — and the degree of craziness, including how crazy the ‘leaders’ of a country are and the likelihood of societal forces controlling or expelling them).
Centering an analysis of, say, here, just 3 exceptional groups, US, Israel, and Wahhabism, while leaving out the exceptionlistic strains in the other countries misses much, and leaves out the imperialistic and aggressive factors of national psyches. The US now has plenty of work to do internally, and yet adventures outwards, while China and Russia engages in trade but pays far more attention to internal progress. Why? What is it in their national characters that make them either work on themselves or project their problems onto others and think they could be successful if they could only get that pie in the sky by conquering others?
And what of nations that would be imperialistic if they could manage it, but lack the resources or current cultural support, such as England, Germany and France, and so try to ride the coattails of a greater power, and yet have buried with the national consciousness, for many of it’s citizens, memories of past glories, perhaps to be yet fulfilled — albeit perhaps in more modest versions in the foreseeable future?
This is very complex stuff, not easily sorted out, and yet is operative in the workings of the world. It’s hard enough to understand just one human psyche, much less 6 billion in interaction. But there it is. Maybe we can find a more representative paradigm, and maybe get some working models using computer analysis and emulation which would be more comprehensive and predictive?
Sim City, Sim Earth, Sim Geopolitics?
BTW, this is not just nation, but religions, and other groups.
Sects of Christianity are generally very ‘exceptional’, and their aggressives for taking over the world varies with time, sect, and place. Yazidism is as exceptional as it gets, but they are completely introverted — the only way to be a Yazidi is to be born as one — no converts allowed.
Some groups have a keen appreciation of their history and group characteristics, real or imagined. The strength of this feeling of not so much ‘uniqueness’, but ‘unlikeness’ to other groups, depends on the history of the group, how long it has been together as a coherent separate identity, the religion or ideology that binds them together, have they ever been subjected to or subjugated by another group, and was that a cruel, murderous or merely humiliating experience. The size of the group and its internal cohesion is vital to group identity, hence groups, like the Jews, that do not really approve of out-marriage, (the ultra-orthodox in particular consider it a great tragedy, the loss of ‘precious Jewish souls’)that practise a great degree of internal groupthink (with apostates lambasted as ‘self-hating Jews’)and that carry out numerous, often onerous, acts that differentiate themselves from non-Jews, have maintained a group existence over 3500 years, despite numerous travails. This despite all those who find themselves out of love with the strictures and inconsistencies of faith simply being able to wander off and out of religious Jewry, to a social, cultural or merely familial identity, if any at all. Many ‘recovering Jews’ as they are known to some, simply tire of the pretense that they are ‘Gods Chosen People’, ‘the Treasured Nation’, or, Satanyahu’s favourite, so it is said, ‘The Eternal People’, and having to excuse or justify Israel’s hideous crimes, when basic human decency says that is immoral. The remaining Jews, self-selected to hatred of the goyim, colonial detestation of the Palestinians who refuse to disappear, and psychologically scarred by the Nazi Judeocide, have become extremely dangerous in their nuclear-armed belligerence, bellicosity and hatred of all who dare criticise them or Israel.
The USA has followed a similar path, unmediated by long history, experience of foreign occupation or destructive war on the home turf. There the mantle of Gods Chosen People, which English like the quaint British-Israelite Society attempted to usurp during the grand Imperial Days, has been co-opted by the American elite with their group narcissism of Manifest Destiny and Exceptionalism. The Gods Chosen status is now shared with the Jews, so recently pariahs in the USA (most of the Founding Fathers were not well disposed to them)but now firmly in charge of US politics, Business, particularly finance from the Federal Reserve down to the pawn industry and pay-day micro-loans, the MSM, entertainment and the Internet, in a triumph of nepotism and entryism with no parallels that I know of, certainly not in recent centuries. All garnered by the simple application of the Universal Lubricant, money, to the essentially corrupt US system. There’s the real ‘Exceptionalism’-that Princeton can be criticised in not so veiled as fashion as ‘antisemitic’, for having a mere 13% of its under-graduates Jewish, when the Ivy League average is around 20% (from 2% of the US population). That when the perennial Jewish position atop college entrance scores (bashfully put down to Jewish hyper-intelligence)has been usurped by east and south Asians. Which, of course, leads us to consider whether the Jewish elite, having worked so hard and successfully to take over the running of the global hegemon, will ever accept global multi-polarity, or even, horror of horrors, Chinese and/or Indian hegemony. I doubt it, because I very much doubt that they will ever get to the position of control they enjoy in the USA in China, or India, for that matter, despite having made considerable inroads in India in recent times, leveraging their expertise in suppression of captive Moslem populations to advise the Indians on repressing the Kashmiris. I just cannot see a Confucian Zionist tendency arising in China.
True, the present govt in India is Hindu Sectarian, but there are countervailing realities:
(a) The state structure is strongly secular. I dont think it can be dented by the present govt.
(b) The present Govt has got in , on a first-past-the-post system, with only 30% of the vote.
True, the present Govt in India is Hindu sectarian but there are countervailing realities :
(a) The state structure in India is strongly secular.
(b) This govt got in , under a first-past-the-post system, with only 30% of the vote. If the opposition unites, we can change the govt.
(c) True again, that Israelis have butted in with regard to “advising” India in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). With the present lot of Hindutva forces, it is said that the “murderers of Mahatma Gandhi” (gandhi was assassinated by a Hindu fanatic) and the “murderers of Jesus Christ” are exchanging notes ! But, remember the huge differences between Kashmir and Palestine. In Palestine, it is the Arabs who have been thrown out of their homes. In kashmir Valley, it is the small Hindu minority that has been thrown out! Not for one moment denying the horrible oppression by security forces of india in J&K. But the whole problem was created by the Brits originally and now by weapons and ideology supplied to infiltrators from pakistan by the Saudi Wahabis
Saudi Arabia is undoubtedly a source of much that is evil in the world today. Not in the league of the USA, by far the greatest force for evil in history, or the Saud’s ‘cousins’ in Israel, but the Wahhabist poison is so toxic and the Saud crime family so morally, spiritually and financially corrupt as to almost be beyond description. The Real Axis of Evil, the USA/NATO, Israel and Saudi Arabia and GCC will bring all humanity to ruin. They possess a Messianic streak that makes their reform into something not entirely malevolent impossible, and in the age of thermo-nukes, their defeat would be a Pyrrhic victory for mankind.
Put the appointment and supervision of the leaders under the responsibility of wise elder women.
I consider exceptionalism as an incurable mental disorder.
In psychiatric terminology it is referred to as: It-is-all-about-me-me-me.
There’s difference in degree between healthy self esteem and psychopathic or neurotic narcissism. Yet, sometimes it may be considered genetic/organic brain dysfunction, and sometimes the result of overindulgence by parents, or overcompensation for neglect.
Dunno if it’s incurable, but it’s nasty while operative. Maybe some electro-shock therapy would disrupt a brain enough to change it — but how much economic or military shock does it take to disrupt an empire? Apparently Putin’s talking therapy is not doing the job. (Or how about a ‘color revolution’ in Mexico?)
Great analysis – and thread :)
This article adds to the thesis, and even quotes Andrew:
Anyone: I cannot make head nor tail of Erdogan’s game. Surely Turkstream is in trouble if he pursues this policy in Syria?
Or is it that NATO has him by the proverbials, and he is effectively incapable of resistance?
If the latter, are there other players/factions in Turkey who are undermining the Greater Israel project to swallow Syria whole?
Maybe disrupting Turkstream is the intention of the empire which I assume is pressuring Ergodamn (who creating hard spots for Russia). That’s the problem with Russia trying to supply EU with gas — opens itself to nasty games. It has other options!
The simplest solution I think would have been destroy the junta and free Ukraine.That must happen anyway before this crisis can end.And when it does ,the pipelines to the EU are secure without any “Turkstream” or Southstream”.But if Russia wanted either of those two it would seem to me the Southstream through Bulgaria was the next easier option.True the current Bulgarian government caved to EU/US pressure and stopped it.But a judicious use of Pro-Russian feeling among many Bulgarian.Coupled with a few hundred million in bribes to Bulgarian “leaders” might have made the current government into the “previous” government.And the “new” current government pro-Russian.And ready to approve the Southstream.
Turkey is too unstable internally to count on them as pardners.There is a deep divide inside Turkey.Many people are secularist,and many are very religious.The government leans to the religious side.But the military leans more to the secular side.They are always a heartbeat away from a “color revolution” possibility.If that wasn’t bad enough to worry about.There is the religious and ethnic splits themselves.The government is trying to play ball with the hard-line anti-Russian Sunni states.While there are many smaller Shia groups in Turkey that don’t like that.Then there are the 20% or so of the people who are Kurd.And have been oppressed for years, to add fuel to the fire.Turkey is still a part of NATO.And they oppose Russia on Syria (part of that playing ball with the hard-line Sunni states).The icing on the cake is that Turkey for centuries has feared or hated Russia.So putting all that together, I really don’t see how Russia hopes this “Turkstream” will help them.Certainly from an economic standpoint Turkey would be smart to be friends with Russia.But since when in geopolitics has being smart been the route always chosen by countries “leaders”.
There’s a never-ending search for a model that will explain cultural pain. In my view, which I explain at thelovegovernment.com the tap-root of evil is patriarchy. Religious patriarchs are are a later type of side-root. Any analysis that leaves out patriarchy as a first cause is doomed to irrelevance, and just feeds the problem by causing confusion. I realize that this kind of talk makes no sense in a patriarchal culture, which denial I believe adds credence to my point. Thanks for opening vital areas of inquiry, and allowing ideas like mine to be expressed.
A big problem is that kids need parents to survive, and that sets up all sorts of possibilities for toxic scripts and archetypes: gods and clergy, political leaders and nations, teachers at school, bosses at work.
If patriachy were the sile problem then you can investigate the marriage system of warrior women of Nair caste with Scholar Brahmins of Namboodiyaar caste of kwrala state in India , a system where matriachy prevails .
it is not bad system .
but is it without any problem ?
Worth investigating to verify your theory
re: Paul Craig Roberts commenting on the state of the world ( he mentions The Saker’s article on Russia and WWII
Wonder what both of you (Dennis and Blue) think of the Brave New World project to annihilate the Mother?
Because – at the risk of sounding like some Cassandra-cum-Sybil – I am seeing all the ‘signs’ of destruction of the mother-child gestalt through the promotion of homosexuality and A.R.T.
The Brits have legalized genetic modification of embryos – proto-humans – using a (very rare) genetic disorder as the rationale. It doesn’t surprise me at all the British Establishement has done this – it is deeply patriarchal without any corresponding culture of matriarcharchy (like France, or Ireland or any of the Global South countries.) It is also exceptionally child-hostile and pdophile/pederast-tolerant.
Interesting that one of the most corrupt countries in the world (according to rankings) pre-war Ukraine, was a major venue for surrogacy. The other main venue is India, teeming with millions of slum-poor women and a caste Hindu system which ‘sacralizes’ social – and sexist – feudalism.
Russia has pulled back: instituting requirements of medical infertility, and disallowing behavioural sterility (gay male couples.)
This is an underlying pattern apparent to me.
Am I the only one ‘seeing’ it and the contaminant cheapening/commodification of human life? Am I the only one seeing The Laboratory-as-Incubus replacing the Mother-Womb by stealth?
I don’t see this as a significant danger because it’s so unworkable, so contrary to both biological and psychological imperatives. Not that there are not some who would want to try,
I don’t know what A.R.T. means. I don’t think promotion of homosexuality will change anything in terms of numbers; it’s just a natural phenomenon which sorts out to about the same percentage, unless some serious hormone or endocrine disruption is in the mix, and then many things will be disrupted to likely reduce the population and health (and if that were the goal there are easier ways).
What could be helpful, however, is to educate people on how to be parents — something that’s been hurt by the pervasiveness of the nuclear family and loss of extended family with some wisdom of the elders. But it’s also lacked some real knowledge over often mistaken traditions and cultural norms, which led to destructive child-rearing practices, and even investing in children to fulfill their potential as human beings — as opposed to ‘our most valuable resource’ as if kids were just another commodity. A big problem in the US for example, is the dehumanizing treatment of kids, dumbing them down with essentially fascist and rotten educational systems, physical punishment, bullying, infantilization, and zombification of kids, and overall terrible ‘management practice’ that echos how badly workers are treated and exploited in their jobs.
Many or most parents just have kids while learning almost nothing about child and human development or how to properly grow kids, many knowing more about how to grow their lawns than their family, or give up control to the schools, churches, or popular media. They should at least read
Your children are not your children.
They are the sons and daughters of Life’s longing for itself.
They come through you but not from you,
And though they are with you yet they belong not to you.
You may give them your love but not your thoughts,
For they have their own thoughts.
You may house their bodies but not their souls,
For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow,
which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.
You may strive to be like them,
but seek not to make them like you.
For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.
You are the bows from which your children
as living arrows are sent forth.
The archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite,
and He bends you with His might
that His arrows may go swift and far.
Let your bending in the archer’s hand be for gladness;
For even as He loves the arrow that flies,
so He loves also the bow that is stable.
I am so pleased to hear someone speak of removing the US “exceptionalist minority” (gangster oligarchs who control the govt & media). Too often people seem to just assume that it is necessary for entire countries to go to war in order to defeat them. Having control of the govt they have also the control of the highest echelons (only) of the military.
The byplay between the 3 heads of Cerberus is interesting. Perhaps it would be best to mention the 4th head, which is more discreet but always there: the economic global economic web which prevents countries from issuing their own credits as they did before Bretton Woods. This IMF/World Bank/BIS system of control determines the rate at which countries are permitted to develop by necessitating that they borrow money from the West.
Ellen Brown’s website gives a lot of info on this. Or Starikov’s free online book.
Thank you for the thought-provoking article. Syria seems to be deteriorating right now, unless she gets a lot of help from her friends.
The so-called Exceptionalists (aka, Anglo-American Zionist empire) go beyond the countries that this article names.
They includes some key nations that are playing a very Machiavellian double game, as they try to pretend to be (possible) allies of the Eurasianists, even as they side with the Anglo-Zionists.
In particular, TURKEY and especially INDIA.
While Turkey appears to be making overtures to the Eurasian side by participating in the Turkstream gas pipeline, it is increasing its support of Islamic terrorists against Syria–and hence implicitly against Iran and the Eurasian allies.
While this behavior should not be a surprise given that Turkey is a long-standing NATO member and cozy with America and Israel, it is India that is the most suspect given its self-styled championing of “non-alignment,” multipolarity, etc.
While India is a member of BRICS and wants to join the SCO, it has also ramped up its military alliance with the United States, which in fact has usurped Russia as India’s number 1 weapons dealer.
India Emerges as Largest Foreign Customer of US Arms
In fact, India has cozied up to the Anglo wing of the Anglo-Zionist Empire quite aggressively.
India, US boost military-strategic drive against China
India tilts still closer to Washington
India and US to further expand military-strategic ties
US elite rolls out red carpet for Indian PM Modi
Australian government embraces security pact with India
Australia-India uranium deal strengthens economic and strategic ties
To add insult to injury, India has also come out of the closet about its alliance with the Zionist wing of the Anglo-Zionist Empire.
Revealed: The India-Israel Axis
India 2014 Elections: Narendra Modi, Israel’s Best Friend In South Asia
India and Israel’s Secret Love Affair
India and Israel: A Demonstrative Love Affair http://www.theglobalist.com/india-and-israel-a-demonstrative-love-affair/
Perhaps, it is time to kick India out of BRICS and replace it with Iran instead, as India is increasingly exposing itself as an Anglo-Zionist Trojan Horse.
India is too large a country to become easily a pawn for US against China. Yes, there is a risk of india getting too close to the US but things are happening both ways:
(a) In both india and China, there are entrenched lobbies aligned to the West and the major task for Modi and Xi is to overcome these influences.
(b) Modi plays one side off the other for maximum benefit. China is important for Modi and he has already put a stop to all talk of “string of pearls’ to deride China’s maritime activity in the Indian Ocean.
(c) Whatever the zionists may do, India has always been serious about building up Iran and
India ,my country is full of useful idiots at the top and they are traitors too.
thus they have chosen usa because their sons and daughters want to live in usa.
for that they will sell their mother.
do not trust India please,nor pakistan.
last prime minter mmsingh a sikh who was never elected was /is an american spy.
Thanks for your ever-thoughtful contribution Blue. And for my favourite Kalil Gibran poem – so apposite.
Much of what you say is true
Thanks for your ever-thoughtful contribution Blue. And for my favourite Kalil Gibran poem – so apposite.
Much of what you say is true. But I was really trying to identify the underlying motivation of the 1% in promoting top-down social manipulations like gay ‘marriage’ – something which for more than 2000 years of human history had never been institutionalized as marriage functioned essentially to legitimize the offspring of men and women. Homosexual union cannot generate offspring.
So why did undefining marriage become so important to the Sorosians?
Just as Bill Gates ‘philanthropy’ is cover for his Malthusian population-control agenda, or Sorosian OS NGOs are destabilizing agents for regime change, the undefining of marriage was packaged as a ‘human rights issue. In truth, it was but a Trojan horse for the normalization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (A.R.T.) That is why the French (who had no issues with civil union) took to the streets in their millions, including many gay Frenchmen.
The consequences for children (and women’s health) is being glossed out of the picture. The question of identity – the term ‘genealogical bewilderment’ is used by some of the adults brought into the world this way – is being decided in terms of barter/ownership and refereed by lawyers. The truth Kalil Gibran expresses so beautifully is air-brushed out of the picture.
C ontrol over human reproduction – both quantitatively (limiting the masses through war and pharma) and qualitatively (genetic engineering, eugenics) – is always a concern for the 1%, from old European monarchies to globalists. (Because globalists have inter-jurisdictional concerns about their money/assets, the demand that SCOTUS should insist on international recognition of US gay ‘marriage’ was no surprise, or that the OS proxies in the EU and elsewhere would finance its promotion. )
Hitler’s Third Reich was a social experiment to test both methods of control: The stated aim of I.G. Farben, his main industrial backers, was to commodify the human body as a ‘bag of goodies’. The means of extraction was not their concern, as Mengele’s experiments show.
I, like most of the regulars here, am hostile to fascism. It’s just that I don’t ‘read’ the abstraction in exclusively political terms: I am concerned with it’s ‘essence’.
I am still trying to join up the dots.
The gays, etc., have always been among us, but in the past and in other cultures it was not often a big thing, and in some they were seen as shamans, seers, etc., with their often exceptional creativity and such recognized as beneficial to society, or simply accepted as ‘one of those things’, or even integrated into societal structures (Sparta, American natives, etc.).
But in the west, and under various conservative religious doctrines, they have often been demonized, and this is encouraged by the conservative or fascist elements of government, made into a political issue, and used in the old divide and conquer tactics. We find then reactive dissent, which can be manipulated politically.
Anything might be used — exploited — for political purposes by those seeking power and control, by dividing people. We know about these nasty games, and so should look for them and always suspect it when ‘issues’ come up, and especially look for it when some people who can be categorized as a separate group happen to also generally oppose the fascists — like maybe the kids in school who resist authoritarianism and get labeled as mentally or psychologically abnormal (hyperactive, defiant, etc.), or witches or heretics who question the authority of the religious institutions, or the people who want decent treatment for animals or concern for the environment (now classified in the US as terrorists). Even people with odd bumps on their heads were said to be mentally deficient (phrenology),.
And let’s not forget
Randy Newman – Short People
Special bonus song (grin)
Randy Newman – Political Science
No one likes us-I don’t know why
We may not be perfect, but heaven knows we try
But all around, even our old friends put us down
Let’s drop the big one and see what happens
We give them money-but are they grateful?
No, they’re spiteful and they’re hateful
They don’t respect us-so let’s surprise them
We’ll drop the big one and pulverize them
Asia’s crowded and Europe’s too old
Africa is far too hot
And Canada’s too cold
And South America stole our name
Let’s drop the big one
There’ll be no one left to blame us
We’ll save Australia
Don’t wanna hurt no kangaroo
We’ll build an All American amusement park there
They got surfin’, too
Boom goes London and boom Paree
More room for you and more room for me
And every city the whole world round
Will just be another American town
Oh, how peaceful it will be
We’ll set everybody free
You’ll wear a Japanese kimono
And there’ll be Italian shoes for me
They all hate us anyhow
So let’s drop the big one now
Let’s drop the big one now
You get bonus points for the songs.
The population of this planet has way too many humans. That was already apparent last century. One can look at this two ways. The zionazi/nazi way of too many “brown people” is bad, they must be snipped, or the a more holistic view that there are way too many people on this planet and things are going pear shaped outrageously fast and people really need to have less children if a non-“Soylent Green” world just a few useful to humans species is to remain. It’s a choice, do you want to remain white and chauvinistic, ultimately the braindead toys of Jewish/fascist oligarchs, and their depraved mentality, or a part of a vibrant world shared by uncountable different living species? Time is fast running out.
So the Russians fall in the lot of the “braindead toys of Jewish/fascist oligarchs, and their depraved mentality”? Aren’t they right them who say Putin is Hitler? He wants more children.
“The US emerged from World War II with the capacity to extend its military reach all across Eurasia, but one regional theater (aside from the Soviet Bloc) posed a noticeable problem for its penetration, and that was the Mideast. The US had vested geopolitical interests in shattering Arab unity after World War II (partly in order to preempt the possible creation of a pro-Soviet supranational entity) and creating a geopolitical perch that could allow it to practice a permanent proxy intervention role in picking apart each regional payer, hence the creation of Israel and the formalization of the American Exceptionalist-Zionist strategic convergence. The global significance of the Mideast for American Exceptionalism’s grand strategy will be explained in the following section, but what’s important to understand at this juncture is that American Exceptionalism’s empowerment and support of Zionism was meant to create a proxy partner that had a shared interest in militarily unraveling Arab unity, which is exactly what the ultimate result of the Arab-Israeli wars happened to be.”
This is that old zionist line about America creating Israel to be it’s “aircraft carrier” in the Mideast. it’s tired, old propaganda, constantly repeated by zionist gate-keepers on the phony left, such as Chomsky. Not only are facts phony supporting this rubbish, the “logic” behind it is pure propaganda illogical, but constantly spammed zio-marketing.
That “aircraft carrier” scheme was marketed by ziofascist oligarchs in the USA who wanted to persuade their non-zionist fascist oligarchical brethren in the American establishment to support an Israeli project. One should remember that the American oligarchy at that time was not particularly zionist and that a good deal of the fascist American oligarchy were not only anti-semitic, to varying degrees, they also supported nazi Germany, some (Rockefeller, Bush families) to the point of having their assets seized by the US regime during WW2 for their dealings with the nazis during wartime. It was to persuade this sector of the US fascist establishment, and the majority of the American oligarchy still not zio-Jew-friendly enough, that the zionazis created their “Israel can be an asset of the USA” scam.
Ever hear of the Union League Club? This is a preeminent “watering hole” for the American oligarchy in NYC. Look up the history. Until around 1970 they did not allow Jews to be members. While Jewish/zionist oligarchs are now essentially running the American colonial show for the ZPC/NWO, when the Israeli zionazi state was vomited upon the world in the 1940s, the zionazi was still the minor portion of the American oligarchy.
The “Israel is a USA colony” meme is an important “left gate-keeper” propaganda theme. It points the finger at the USA, while obfuscating the important role of Jewish zionist oligarchs.
Not only that, it conceals the role of ZPC/NWO Mideast colonialism. The support of the USA (and Europe) for Israel has always been a conflict provoker in the Mideast, not that of a solidifier of control. Most Mideast dissension to western oligarch control has centred around western support for Israel. If one will notice, the further a western colony in the Mideast was from Israel, the less it was affected internally by anti-Israeli, anti-western capitalist action. The support of the western capitalist oligarchs for Israel, and its ethnic cleansing, created the opposition to these same oligarchs among the people of the Mideast. This provided the basis of the rise of Mideast anti-western, but pro-Soviet countries in the region during the 1950s. Without that western oligarch support for the zionazis, none of the pro-Soviet governments would have been able to form. The Mideast would have probably become a bunch of “Saudi Arabia” sorts of western fascist oligarch run colonies.
So the vomiting of Israel upon the Mideast landscape was not a blessing for the western fascist establishment as a means of control of the region, it created a hell of lot more problems for them, and basically lost them a lot of the control they essentially had before the event.
“One must always remember, though, that it’s not Westerners, Jews, or Muslims who are in any way to blame for what Cerberus does, but instead the most radical ideological components of these societies (unrepresentative of the vast majority, thus making them extreme outliers) which have seized control of key states and are now using their host entities to engage in a global proxy war against the multipolar forces of inclusion and integration.”
Here we have the classical case of psychopaths at the top (= zionazis) controlling the psychopaths at the bottom (= ISIS heart-eaters, etc.), and in between are the willfully ignorant masses which are “only doing their job”. This sounds familiar from somewhere, doesn’t it? Yes! From the Nuremberg Trials. Look how the recipe for disaster stays the same. We are to think again: that very kind of evil, therefore, has not been defeated!
Of course, it’s the masses in the middle who are to blame the most; they are maintaining the status quo, & whose task is to bring the psychopaths’ alliance down before it’s too late.
Thank you again for an excellent piece. The vision of Cerberus is very striking and really sums up, in a succinct way, the three inter-weaving destructive players and their end goal.
What is worrying in this scenario too is the addition of the Kurds, which have been brought into play in Iraq and Syria (Turkey watch your back – you’ll be double crossed too).
They seem to be throwing everything plus the kitchen sink at this.
Kerry’s Sochi visit to me was superficial – the Russians cannot trust Cerberus – the US Govt. wanted to portray an image of opening the door/dialouge but at the same time are being destructive in Macedonia and Yemen etc. Ukraine is still shelling and attacking too with NATO drills taking place in E EU. I think Cerberus are trying another tact/avenue (Nuland in tow said it all) but it is disingenious and Russia and the Herculean initiative must be fully alert to this and not trust it one bit.
Thank you Veritas!
Wonderful article, Andrew. I knew most of these basic facts; however, you significantly refined my understanding of them. Thanks.
Thank you James!
So you say there is no Russian and Chinese exceptionalism.
Wow.. am very impressed Andrew.. thourough .. deep and farsighted..
this is a 1st class , well worded and syquentially presented assessment .