by Ramin Mazaheri for The Saker Blog
Back in November 2008, Rahm Emmanuel, then president-elect Barack Obama’s chief of staff and later the detested mayor of Chicago, famously told The Wall Street Journal, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. … This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not before.” A wave of “socialise the losses” right-wing capitalism followed; millions lost their homes, pensions, jobs, sanity, neighbourhood cohesion, etc.
France is using the anti-establishment crisis of the Yellow Vests in a way that Zionist-supporter Emmanuel certainly approves of: they are using it to criminalise anti-Zionism.
Backtracking from just a day earlier, President Emmanuel Macron threw French liberty under the bus and said that France will now define “anti-Zionism as a modern-day form of anti-Semitism”.
Well I guess I better totally rewrite this article! LOL, not a chance.
France had an atrocious 74% leap in anti-Jewish acts in 2018, which caused nationwide demonstrations against anti-Semitism on February 19.
More against anti-Jew acts… I could not be.
But the demonstrations were a clear manipulation of righteous anti-racism sentiment, because they were orchestrated right alongside an effort to slander the anti-government Yellow Vest movement as a basket of racist, anti-Jewish, hillbilly, intolerant, uncultured deplorables. Now we see they had a second goal, just as I had openly suggested.
Domestic things first: France’s Holy Secular Empire rallies to attack tolerance & democracy
Given that they are calling for the resignation of the president and his cadres, from the very beginning of the Yellow Vest movement the government has obviously done everything they could to portray the Yellow Vests as such… and also as radicals, rioters and rejects of society – anything but legitimate.
But the marches show that (what I refer to as) France’s “Holy Secular Empire” has sprung back into action. The Holy Secular Empire is characterised by pro-French jingoism, intolerance for those who are deemed not tolerant enough of the “correct” things (no matter how morally repugnant and intellectually incorrect said things may be), and a hypocritical subversion of France’s constitutionally mandated and culturally revered laïcité (political secularism) towards all things regarding race and religion only when certain cultural groups are targeted.
The apex of the Holy Secular Empire was the Je Suis Charlie marches in 2015, when fake-leftists worldwide wept for the right to draw a picture of Prophet Mohammad with his butt cheeks spread open and star covering his anus and also Mohammad directing a pornography movie. (Yes, those are among the cartoons they published.)
The arrival of the anti-austerity, anti-neoliberal, anti-EU, anti-Eurozone, anti-1% Yellow Vest movement has forced the HSE’s fake-leftist ideals back to the fore. The last week has seen a massive media and political blitz which aims to instrumentalise the fight against racism as a way to turn public opinion against the Yellow Vests, and eventually put a stop to their marches.
The slur campaign went into overdrive when the atrociously right-wing and pro-Zionist writer Alain Finkielkraut was filmed at the Yellow Vest demonstration on February 16th being insulted (being correctly labelled) with the phrase “dirty Zionist”. Finkielkraut is a former leftist who renounced his leftist ideals for reactionary ones, and such sellouts – those who can perhaps best critique the left because they understood it at one time – are always adored by the 1% and the Mainstream Media.
Firstly, what is Alain Finkielkraut doing at a Yellow Vest march? Of course they hate him – he was similarly booed and shooed away at the leftist, Occupy-inspired Nuit Debout protests in 2016. The French say “once does not make a custom”, but it seems as if every leftist movement can now count on Finkielkraut getting back in the spotlight by annoying them with his presence. Of course, just like in 2016, Finkielkraut wants people to believe in 2019 it’s just anti-Jew hatred, but he clearly refuses to accept that people legitimately resent and detest him for being one of the French’s 1%’s leading intellectual toadies.
I saw Finkielkraut being interviewed on right-wing BFM TV just after the incident: he was doing his usual rear end-kissing of the average Frenchman’s bygone culture. He was going on and on about how the Roman Catholic French Church is a natural ally with the Jews, begging for their support and fraternity… and never mentioning Islam as their third Abrahamic brother. That’s odd, considering that much of the Koran’s very first chapter calls for unity with Jews and Christians, declares that Islam does not discriminate against their apostles and embraces them, how the children of Israel are exalted above other nations, and on and on and on. I asked a Middle Eastern Christian colleague why Finkielkraut didn’t include Islam, considering these obvious facts?
“Ramin,” he said, “why do you think Alain Finkielkraut would commit career suicide?”
LOL, good point. But this is why people on the left hate Finkielkraut – he makes bad things worse by insisting that la belle France réactionnaire doesn’t have to change.
The Finkielkraut episode, combined with a couple recent typical pro-Nazi graffiti taggings, allowed the Mainstream Media to point the finger at the Yellow Vests. Ever obliging, and you cannot make this up: French Parliamentarians rushed to try and ban anti-Zionist speech!
Surprised – why? In 2014, during Israel’s latest war on Gaza, France became the first country to ban pro-Palestinian demonstrations.
Foreign things second: Since when do French politicians care about the French?
Banning anti-Zionism is – without a doubt – truly dangerous for the safety of the French, ruinous for France’s international image, ruinous to France’s cultural values…but since when do French politicians care about France?
The Parliamentarians said the ban debate was on the grounds that “anti-Zionism” is the same as “anti-Semitism”.” For several days this falsity was relayed by every major news organisation with zero comment or a question. Cleary, the Holy Secular Empire is a mighty force, but not an enlightened one.
Such a conflation staggers the mind! “Zionism” is an imperialist project based on earthly political ideas – (the inherently racist idea that Jews need to be segregated into their own country); “Judaism” is a religion, based on faith. It has been truly sad to see what a poor job the average journalist, commentator, politician, editor and publisher did by conflating the two over the past week. This is why Yellow Vests hate us journalists, guys and gals.
One can be 100% anti-Zionist and 100% pro-Jew. Indeed, we all must be.
However, the reality is that – for fake-leftists and the Holy Secular Empire – one cannot be both pro-Jew and anti-Zionist… not even if you are a Jew.
Paris-based journalist George Kazolias emailed me this photo from the huge “Hipsters Against Anti-Jews” march at Place de la République in Paris on February 19. His sign reads, “I am Jewish and anti-Zionist”. Kazolias, who has decades of experience and whose integrity is unquestionable, told me that this intelligent young man was roughed up and forced to take his sign down.
That is the Holy Secular Empire at its finest: they claim to be anti-racist, but only when certain races are involved. “The Palestinians – not today, pal: you need to take a backseat to the Zionists right now. Frankly, let’s just ban anti-Zionism altogether.” They claim to be politically modern, and yet they support an imperialist project for which there is no doubt about who is in the wrong and who is in the right. They claim to be tolerant and demand that you be tolerant for their preferred groups, but they are willing to rough up a brave dissenter who dares to express a contrarian opinion (even when that dissenter is a member of the group being affected).
Surprised that France’s Holy Secular Empire is neither Holy (it is anti-Holy), nor Secular (it is incredibly partisan), but, like all Empires, based on illegitimate, anti-democratic force?
The surprise comes from the false, mainstream idea that France is what they say they are: a beacon of free speech, the world’s greatest adherents of the right to open debate on political issues, a fighter for truth, tolerance and other human rights… but it’s mostly for human rights which do very little to advance socioeconomic & political equality but which certainly allow the rich to express themselves unfettered in West European / Liberal Democratic / bourgeois systems.
Why the backtracking by Macron? I thought he was pro-Nazi? Let’s not forget that last November Macron was forced to call off his planned tribute to Vichy France leader and Nazi collaborator Marshall Petain – that makes him more responsible for the recent spike in anti-Jewish acts than anyone, no? People follow the lead of the leader, and he praised Nazi-era France.
From the beginning I openly said on social media that the timing of the marches made their legitimacy even more suspect: they were the night before the French President’s annual genuflecting before CRIF, the umbrella of Jewish groups which serves as France’s influential Jewish lobby. I felt bad for France’s Jews – the timing of these marches already seemed more like political manipulations which aimed to culminate in the criminalisation of anti-Zionism, but the timing helped perpetuate the idea that Jews are overly powerful among the French elite.
The annual genuflecting also shows that, while individual and anecdotal violence against Jews needs far steeper penalties in France, on the institutional level France’s Jews are not just well-represented but punching above their weight: there is no similar annual genuflecting by the French president at an French Muslim organisation, even though Muslims are 10 times the number of Jews in France. Each new French president even has the gall to create their own, preferred “new, improved, Franco-Muslim group”, which no Muslim takes remotely seriously but which the Mainstream Media takes as, LOL, legitimate.
Macron made his backtracking at the CRIF dinner. Ugh…bad for Jews, bad for France, bad for Palestinians, bad for those who oppose terrorism in France (i.e everyone) and on and on.
Global things third: we still have the Yellow Vests, at least. Also: I hate Zionism
Call the cops on me….
The reality is that mainstream journalists simply won’t stand up for the difference between Zionism and anti-Semitism – even if brave Jews like that one in the photo do – and even if such inaccuracies hurt the image of the everyday Jew.
But such is the effectiveness of Israeli hasbara, counter-information propaganda aimed at Western audiences, that even the word “Jew” cannot be broached. The Western concept that the word “Jew” is somehow a racial slur was hilariously lampooned by the US TV show It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia.
And it affected this article, too: I thought the title should be, “France’s ‘Holy Secular Empire’ slurs Yellow Vests as anti-Jew, bans anti-Zionism” – and why not? It’s shorter, and I like to pretend that column inches still matter in digital media. It’s also more accurate: “Semitic” is a language – meaning the branch which includes Arabic, Hebrew and Aramaic – yet it has been appropriated/given to the adherents of Judaism, regardless of national origin, for so long that the average person now associates “Semite” solely with Jews.
For example, I just had a fine English colleague proofread my upcoming book, Socialism’s Ignored Success Story: Iranian Islamic Socialism, and in one part I discussed out how the “non-Semitic Iranians” might have been predisposed to disagree with certain early Islamic leaders who pushed pro-Arab, and thus ethnically sectarian, policies. This intelligent journalist noted in red next to “the non-Semitic Iranians” the following: “?”. LOL, I changed it, because this is even more of a lost cause than my effort to use “Southwest Asian” instead of the Eurocentric “Middle East”. And I changed the headline because I thought that many half-hearted anti-racists would see “anti-Jew” and hysterically think, “I am too turned off to click on this link – the language is too harsh. The writer must be a nut.”
The mistake made by that young anti-Zionist Jew – who is my brother from another mother – is that he went to the wrong demonstration that night: he went to the fake-leftist / hipster / bobo (bourgeois bohémien) / politician photo-op / pro-Zionist / anti-Yellow Vest demonstration at Place de la République, when he should have been with me at Ménilmontant in the Arab part of town.
I covered that demonstration for PressTV. It was organised by the Union of French Jews for Peace, a wonderful group I have interviewed for years. Heck, some of the very best pro-Palestinian activists in France are Jewish! That is where this young man belonged. The protest was expressly against all racism and expressly against the attempt to slur the Yellow Vests as anti-Semitic.
We numbered about 700 people, with plenty of Yellow Vests, and we garnered far less media coverage (in French: At Ménilmontant, a demonstration of real anti-racists’ against anti-Semitism), but plenty of Israeli hasbara. The Times of Israel headline read, “At Ménilmontant a man yelled ‘Netanyahu licks the (rear end) of Hitler”. If this is how they treat those who are protesting against anti-Semitism, imagine how they treat Palestinians, LOL….
As usual, the people I interviewed there put it better than I could, even though that’s my job:
The Yellow Vests are not ethnic nor religious – they are social, political and fiscal. These are workers who work yet still can’t pay their bills at the end of the month, even though France is such a rich country. If there are anti-Jews in the Yellow Vests, well, 58% of the country supports the Yellow Vests, which equates to 39 million people: out of 39 million people you will find some jerks, and also some racists, but the slurring of the Yellow Vests as anti-Jew is only because the establishment and their toadies will do anything to stop the Yellow Vest movement… which will absolutely not stop.
It won’t stop because, as I wrote at the very beginning of the movement: there is simply no political pathway for the Yellow Vests’ political ideas to be implemented. Therefore, they have no choice but to continue because political demands aren’t whims, but are almost implacably formed over time – in this case, eight years of far-right economic austerity. Yellow Vests can only turn to other Yellow Vests.
At the big demonstration at Place de la République there were 20,000 people – this is a very rare instance of a demonstration in France not being obviously undercounted by authorities; many put the official numbers of the Saturday Yellow Vests at 1/3rd the official total.
But I wasn’t going to to République to celebrate the fake-leftist idea of anti-racism, even though most everyone else did. You had Catholic bishops there, even though they are supposed to not get involved in political demonstrations; you had Francois Hollande and Nicolas Sarkozy; you had plenty of attractive, young, hip people in the very heart of hipster Paris. What’s certain is that everyone was breaking their arms patting each other (and themselves) on the back for being so very progressive, tolerant, modern and leftist.
That made it really quite similar to the largest ever gatherings of the Holy Secular Empire: the 4-million person marches after the Charlie Hebdo attacks, which was at Place de la République too. I was there doing my usual dissident thing in very unwelcoming environment, LOL, and back then what all those fake-leftists hemmed and hawed about was the answer to this simple question: “How is drawing a cartoon of Prophet Mohammad bent over, with his butt cheeks spread, and a star over his anus, or a cartoon of Mohammad filming a porn movie not inflammatory / impolite/ dangerous / racist / Islamophobic / yelling “fire “in a crowded theater?” Fake-leftists still have no answer for that, of course, but they marched just the same and got teary over the sacred glories of French “liberty”.
Real leftists said, “Well, political science ain’t science, so like can attract like here: that stuff is dangerous and reactionary so I’m not surprised who they ran into….”
Another iteration of the media wing of the HSE was on the very day of the 2017 presidential election: French fake-leftist newspaper nonpareil Libération knowingly broke a law insisting on media neutrality just prior to elections by printing a cover which read, “Do what you want but vote Macron”.
This is way I imagined the paper’s budget meeting that day: the hysterical female journalists and the namby-pamby male journalist at Libé (or the namby-pamby female journalists and the hysterical male journalists – that’s fine by me) were sitting around their meeting room table and swearing before their atheistic god that they simply could not risk democracy taking place without fetters; their technocratic creed and noblesse oblige forced them – Gandhi-like – to flout the law in order to save the establishment from the far-right Marine Le Pen… even if that meant putting in the far-right (economically) Macron (who is also now a far-right imperialist, too). If history judged their efforts not the equal of Gandhi’s, Libération had but one choice: to formalise and protect a caste system, also like Gandhi.
The Yellow Vests do not believe that “Jews are secretly in charge” – what they oppose is the continuation of this caste culture, which allows high finance, careerist politicians and hipster Parisians to be the only ones writing public policy.
The Yellow Vests, I’m sure, are majority pro-Palestinian, but I’m even more sure that they view this banning of Zionism as a truly dangerous distraction which will not keep them from relying on food banks at the end of the month.
Those slurs won’t stick, but the Yellow Vests will – more marches are certain. Jews welcome… but only if they are Yellow Vest sympathisers – this is a class-based political movement, of course! Practitioners of identity politics will never be welcome.
As far as Macron… ugh. You have not failed to disappoint, and I openly expected you to be worse than Marine Le Pen, who is terrible. Macron proves, once again, that capitalism-imperialism is far worse than (and is the cause of) racism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, sectarianism, etc.
Ramin Mazaheri is the chief correspondent in Paris for PressTV and has lived in France since 2009. He has been a daily newspaper reporter in the US, and has reported from Iran, Cuba, Egypt, Tunisia, South Korea and elsewhere. His work has appeared in various journals, magazines and websites, as well as on radio and television. He can be reached on Facebook.
Recall that the accusation of antisemitism is:
“faux-outrage greased by hypocrisy and opportunism”
“Back in November 2008, Rahm Emmanuel, then president-elect Barack Obama’s chief of staff and later the detested mayor of Chicago, famously told The Wall Street Journal, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. … This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not before.”
This is what Finkielkraut stated in 1991., regarding the war between the Serbs and the Croats :
“Serbia falsifies the past by saying that the Croats were all Nazis and the Serbs all resitence fighters, falsifies the present by saying that the Croats remain „a genocidal people“, and, in the shadow of this double falsification, cariies out the first racial war in Europe since Hitler. In a word: the Nazis of this story are trying to pass themsekves off as the Jews. Being a Jew, I thought it necessary to deny the Serbian conqurors the blessing of Jewish memory, and to prevent the drafting of the dead, whose guardian I feel myself to be, into the service of those who are perpetrating „ethnic cleansing“ today.”
https://tinyurl.com/y64a9qes , p.204 and 205.
Not only an islamophobe, but a serbophobe too.
In 2005 Finkelkraut, speaking of the French football team, said, ‘People say that everyone admires the French team, because its, black, white, Arab. Actually these days the team is black, black, black, which makes it the laughing-stock of Europe’. Finkelkraut is simply a typical French, Zionazi, racist, as you would expect.
Thanks for that Wend. I have my very own “jewish memory”: The memory of how jews like him, BHL, Kouchner whipped up the media, while their US co-religionists Albright, Holbrooke, Rubin and Clark attacked and dismembered my country.
Finkielkraut is finally being exposed for the racist charlatan that he is. The only problem is in France, this incident / false flag/ will be used to justify legislation further restricting freedom of speech.
And Joseph Lieberman, Eliot Engel, Susan Sontag, Christopher Hitchens, Tim Judah, Anne Leibovitz . .
Some of the vilest Rightist, neo-liberal capitalist, neo-conservative Imperial butcher/propagandists and all-round Imperial hate-mongers are Zionazi Jews. They are vastly over-represented among that vermin rabble, and most of the rest are Sabbat Goy stooges who (compulsorily)adore ‘the only democracy in the Middle East’. However, we must never forget that many Jews, in Israel and, more particularly, in the Diaspora, are not of this kind and many are opponents of Zionazi fascism and racism. They are, of course, given no coverage by the Zionazi-controlled Western fakestream media sewer, like the execrable Guardian, who push the implicit, and at times explicit, Zionazi propaganda line that all Jews are Likudniks who support Israel, and Jewish power elsewhere, unquestioningly. And they suffer abuse from the Zionazi fascists and racists as ‘self-hating Jews’. So I believe it is vital never to talk of ‘the Jews’, as if they are some great undifferentiated mass, and criticism of one or some is an expression of ‘mindless hatred’ of them all, the primary, foundational, lie of the loathsome ‘antisemitism’ industry. Such an attitude of ‘unthinking antipathy’ is, almost ironically (save that it is so familiar and unsurprising), actually true regarding the Zionazis, their villainous hatred of the Palestinians, Arabs, Moslems and anyone, Jew or goy alike, who refuses to bow down and grovel before their universal magnificence. One of the prime sources of the roiling hatred that is impelling humanity towards a global civil war or a neo-feudal ‘war of all against all’, as the tiny elite laugh into their Moet in their gilded fortresses, is simply the projection of Zionazi hatred, as raw and vicious as any such manifestation ever seen, onto the rest of humanity. The Palestinians and Israel’s neighbours are the primary and longest victims of this, the true ‘oldest hatred’, but, as the cancer spreads its metastases worldwide, more and more will become its victims, particularly in the Zionazis’ promotion of a religious war, a ‘Clash of Civilizations’, between Islam and the West, and another such ‘Clash’, between the West and China.
You are delusional writing this – “The Yellow Vests do not believe that “Jews are secretly in charge” – what they oppose is the continuation of this caste culture, which allows high finance, careerist politicians and hipster Parisians to be the only ones writing public policy.”
Who do you think runs the banks and controls the money and pays the colour coded politicians and their gutter whore presstitutes? The only ones more guilty than the oligarchial zionist jews are the vassals goyim who take the blood money – this of course includes the working class jews who allow themselves to be used as fodder for the rich.
Being a jew only matters to the oligarchy when it serves their purpose to obfuscate their crimes and their total control of late stage capitalism. The saud pimps have done the same thing with islam – using religion as cover – not quite as smoothly as the western elites – but the sand princes do their best.
The French AIPAC, the CRF, controls French politics, hence the hatred and contempt for the Palestinians and the compulsory Jew worship. Hence the creation by the Jewish grandees of Micron and his fake political movement designed to enrich the rich and impoverish the rest. And hence the institution of the ‘Holocaust’ as the de facto State pseudo-religion, while all Israel’s millions of victims, all the other victims of the German Nazis, all the victims of French Imperialism, particularly the Algerians, and all the other victims of all the other genocides of history, are near totally ignored and their suffering treated with contempt. ONLY Jewish suffering counts, as ever.
lets not all jump to the conclusion that there really is a rise in antisemitism…..
Craig Murray at his blog demolishes this garbage about ‘74%’ or some other, always double-digit, increase in ‘antisemitic’ acts. He points out that this huge growth, year after year, would result in thousands and thousands of ‘antisemitic’ acts in the UK, yet last year only 20 (twenty) people, mostly neo-Nazis and the like, were prosecuted for real acts.And we all know, but the fakestream media presstitutes must forget and consign to the memory-hole, that many ‘antisemitic’ acts in the past have turned out to be self-inflicted false-flag provocations.
Murray doesn’t mention the fact that an ‘antisemitic’ act as asserted by a Zionazi could simply be answering a screeching Zionazi back, or, as the loathsome Micron has made official, supporting the Palestinians in their unending suffering under Zionazi barbarity. And the huge rise in Islamophic acts, much of it fomented and encouraged by the Zionazis in their open alliances with Western fascists and neo-Nazis (eg Anders Brievik) is now utterly unmentionable. Indeed the Zionazis and their Sabbat Goy stooges have the chutzpah to deny that Islamophobia even exists.
This won’t end well, because, in a repeat of history, the worst of the Jews do not know when to stop in their relentless efforts to control and humiliate the goyim who they detest. Soon enough not decrying the Palestinians as ‘savages’, ‘terrorists’, ‘animals’ etc, in Zionazi hate jargon, will be defined as ‘antisemitism’. You can bet on it, because their hatred, the very essence of their being, is limitless.
On Twitter, (which is where I get my news on GJs from) there was a video of shop owners over whose shop antisemitic graffiti appeared. The graffiti was attributed to the GJs, however the shop owners were adamant that the graffiti appeared on the friday night just BEFORE the GJ manifestation….
This was a great article. We have the same double-speak propaganda in America, since the media is largely controlled by America’s Israel lobby, which also controls congress, and the tech companies.
The best that we can hope for, is that Ivanka Trump will wake up and realize that she can do much better than Jared Kushner, because Trump is also supporting this sheer lunacy!
Congress and Trump agreed with Netenyahu that it would be anti-Semetic not to allow Jews the right to self determination, and that it would be also anti-Semetic to allow Christians and Muslims the right to self-determination. Donald Jr. and the other Trump children are either going to have to convert to Judaism, or allow Jews to determine their fates. At least they have a Jewish sister who may be merciful.
An American or American institution can organize a boycott against any American and even every American company, but if they publicly support BDS, it is illegal in many states, and the Federal government will stop financially supporting universities and other institutions supporting the BDS movement, boycott apple pie, coca cola, mcdonalds, ford motors all you want, when it comes to Israel there is a 3 nos policy, no boycotts, no criticism of the Israeli government, and no support of Palsetinians, because they claim WRONGLY that those would be anti-Semetic actions of bigotry and racism, when Israel is without question, bar none, the most bigoted, racist, anti-humanitarian country on earth! Hitler would have been jealous!
Capitalism-imperialism is anachronistic. It has evolved onto something much
more monstrous-Satanism-Iinquisitionism. Pathological hypocrisy, pathological
lying and deception, pathological perversion, all paving the way for the mass
murder of the innocent are not necessarily inherent to capitalism. They are the
inherent definition of satanism. There is a demonic occult power, a malignant
evil, an obscene perverse spirit unleashed and rampant on the world today.
It has no goal, no purpose other than evil, to deliver the souls of all humanity unto
perdition. The political and ruling classes all belong in padded cells. The Satanic
Inquisition of Perdition that owns and controls them belong in maximum security
prisons for the criminally insane.
evilempire, yes, there is a spiritual battle going on, as good and evil compete for souls.
The MSM by confounding the yellow vests with anti-Semitism are doing their sponsors a big disfavour. What they are saying is that 39 million French people are anti-Semites. When you accuse a majority of being criminals, the meaning of the work “criminal” must change.
As was always inevitable, the Zionazi elites have answered the growth of BDS, and the growing detestation of the fascist, racist, terrorist, apartheid regime, Israel, (including among very many Diaspora Jews)by tugging on their Western Sabbat Goy stooges’ leashes, and ordering them to outlaw ALL criticism of Israel, ALL criticism of the actions of any Jew, anywhere, and ALL moral and political support for the detested Palestinian untermenschen. And the morally and financially corrupt Sabbat Goyim ‘tremble and obey’. Next step-compulsory indoctrination in philosemitism and love of Zionazism, on pain of imprisonment, perhaps for twenty years as is envisaged in US anti-BDS legislation. And the Zionazi don’t just not care about the hatred that their vicious totalitarian actions will inevitably bring. They love it because hatred, as raw and vicious as possible, is the very existential fuel of their being.
But of course, anti-semitism-it is only a matter of time for the zionists, it is the ultimate weapon! It is always available and it always works!
Looks like rothschild & co invested well in their macron monkey.
“French fake-leftist newspaper nonpareil Libération”.
Ramin, you are too polite. It may have changed by now but in the runup to the anti-Muslim hate-fest you attended at the Place de la Republique — the biggest display of racial hatred since the Nuremberg rallies — I googled, Who owns Charlie Hebdo? and out popped la famille Rothschild. La creme de la creme du Capitalisme Sioniste had bought Liberation so that Rothschild could control Charlie Hebdo. If I remember correctly, this was in the _runup_ to Je Suis Charlie fete de la haine. Does the Rothschild crime family still own Fausse Gauche Liberation?
In 2002, I had the opportunity to join the protests against the World Economic Forum as a volunteer citizen journalist. The WEF is normally held on a mountain top in Davos, Switzerland, and all protesters are blocked at the bottom of the mountain. But, in 2002, the WEF was moved to the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in NYC to show unity with Wall Street after the 9-11 attacks.
I had numerous memorable incidents during that trip, but this modern world always reminds me of one. A group of very Orthodox Jews held a press conference and gave interviews to express their views in opposition to the State of Israel. Their religious view was very simple. I probably won’t express it perfectly, but it was that the Word of God told them that it would be God that would restore the Jewish people to their holy land. Thus, it is wrong and against the will of God for mankind to be so presumptuous as to force their own return.
Thus, the notion that being Jewish does not equate to being Zionist was firmly anchored in my head.
I oppose any attempt to label any person, usually as a prelude to hating them which in turn usually precedes to robbing them or killing them, simply because of their race. Each person is an individual, and deserves to be judged on the content of their character. And that of course only if we ignore the religions that teach that we shouldn’t judge at all, but leave that to God. But disliking the policies of the government of the State of Israel is in no way an act of hating anyone based on their ethnicity, color of their skin, color of their eyes, shape of their nose, location of bumps on their skull, who their daddy was, or any other silly idea such as that. Opposing the government of the State of Israel is simply opposing the government of the State of Israel.
Its wrong to hate someone because they are Jewish. But being Jewish does not equate with being Zionist. That’s was quite clearly shown to me in NYC in 2002.
The antisemitism industry operates according to a number of unquestionable (in the West)doctrines. One, that the criticism of the actions of any Jew, anywhere, is indicative of a hatred of all Jews, everywhere. Two, that support for the Palestinians, in any form, is a manifestation of hatred of all Jews, everywhere. Three, that criticism of the Israeli Zionazi regime, and its record of barbarity, racism, terrorism and visceral hatred of International Law and the UN General Assembly and world opinion,is, in fact, simply hatred of the Jews. Inherent in these dogmata is the proposition that Jews are uniform in opinion, and that opinion is basically Zionazi Likudnik and Orthodox Judaic, and any dissenters are ‘self-hating Jews’. And the further, ludicrous but inevitable, dogma that Jews, uniquely, are incapable of committing crimes, even accidentally or by mistake, even as they murder Palestinian children, or torture them and their elders, or destroy tens of thousands of their homes, or destroy their olive trees or poison their flocks, or attack Israel’s neighbours or induce their Sabbat Goy stooges in the USA and the West to kill millions of those neighbours’ civilians. And this morally insane and repulsive pseudo-religion of Zionazi worship is now being imposed throughout the West, particularly in the USA and France, with criminal law and the threat of Draconian terms of imprisonment, and the total abolition of Freedom of Opinion, Thought and Action. But they’re worth it.
On the topic of being the wrong kind of Jew in NYC, American comedian, Gilda Radner came up last week. I re-watched “Gilda Live” from 1980 and was struck by how risky some of her material is from a 2018 perspective. (She performs this song bemoaning the FDA threatening to ban saccharine, because it’s shown “that men prefer skinny girls with cancer to healthy girls with bulging thighs.”) Everyone knows — she died of ovarian cancer. But on Wikipedia, it says she was given a sedative before a CT scan, went into a coma, never recovered, and died three days later. Which suggests, I don’t know, the possibility that she may have died of something else. I would have found that hard to believe in 1980, but today, I wonder!
C’est évidemment logique — au point de vue sioniste — d’accuser les GJ d’antisemitisme. Comme l’a expliqué de façon remarquable notre cher BHL:
”Ces pauvres qui disent qu’ils le sont et qu’ils n’en peuvent plus de l’être, quelle beaufitude, quelle grossièreté, quel manque de manière!”
Pour mériter un tel mépris des ultra-sionistes, il faut bien être un mauvais antisémite, n’est-ce pas?
France has been a happy hunting ground for the Rothschild’s since 1789, when they financed the French “revolution”. Macron, a Rothschild’s banker, is just continuing Rothschild’s policies. The chief curse of France is that unity is not a French characteristic, as proven by their history. Sweden, as a sovereign country, is probably finished. France is following in it’s tracks. It’s questionable if in the future it can possibly survive, or if it will see financial and ethnic conflicts which will destroy the country.
Rothchilds backed both sides of several skirmishes. Supplying Mercenaries for the Brits. during the American Reveolution as well.
On the zioscam
Should we amend the U.S. Constitution to state that in order to run for office in America :
“7A. A candidates list shall not participate in elections to the Congress and a person shall not be a candidate for election to the Congress if the goals or actions of the list or the actions of the person, expressly or by implication, include one of the following: (…) (1) negation of the existence of the United States of America as a Christian and democratic state; (…)”
That is how the Israeli Declaration of Independence is worded, with 3 changes, replacing United States of America with Israel, Congress for the Knesset, & Christian with Jewish.
The Gantz/Lapid Israeli Resilience Party appears to be nothing more than a game of linguistic and mental gymnastics.
Not exactly skilled in mathematics or geography is the only obvious conclusion that one can arrive at in the proclamation that any Jew has a right to return to Israel, and that Israel is the home of all Jews.
Sorry, but I have to add further evidence to the mathematically challenged allegation. Exhibit B. is the fractional reserve system of a ratio of 1/10 developed by the Jewish gold smiths.
Strange, or not so, that not a single word was said about, not a single expression of outrage at the vandalizing (smashed statues, knocked down tabernacles, scattered or destroyed the Eucharist, burnt altar cloths and torn down crosses, among other acts of desecration of religious items (drawing crosses on the wall with excrement) of 10 Catholic Churches since the beginning of February, neither by the ‘Abrahamic’ brothers, nor by the supposedly admirer of Nazi-era France, Macron, nor, of course, by the Holy Secular Empire.
First law of the Church of ‘Antisemitism’, Inc.- only Jewish suffering counts.
The attack on that cemetery was clearly made up, the timing is very “coincidental”.
We can’t be certain, but it is suspicious, particularly given numerous such false-flag attacks in the past. If deliberate, it is despicable, but one of Zionazism’s many Rightist ‘friends’ is, in my opinion, the prime suspect.
The “crisis” initiated with Finkelkraut being “insulted” is not about making antizionism illegal. I mean: sure, they really want that, but there is more. Since the Sarkozy era, zionism became the relay to overcome questions about wealth sharing with a wide range of fabricated problems involving muslims. Sure, arab muslims have been instrumented to dismay social cohesion in France since the first immigration wave of the 60’s, but during Sarkozy’s presidential term the zionists were put on a highway for spreading hysteria.
Then something went wrong with the Yellow Jackets. They don’t care about muslims, bringing the fundamental debate about the rich against the poor back to the public space. The zionists are litterally panicking because it will become obvious that their services are no longer needed so they are resorting to the big gun of antisemitism, not caring how it could backfire but this is another story.
While being initially just a doctrine, zionism has turned to an integrated service for governements and the related wealthiest elite to gag or bamboozle political opponents. Services include low-intensity political noise, stupid debates for wasting everybody’s time and brainpower, and high-intensity events as terror attacks.
Offering such political service helped zionists to get a huge stake on medias. French medias now relay the most blatant zionist propaganda, with an impressive lack of fear of being ridiculous. During Sarkozy second campaign in 2007 they talked during one full month about slaughter of cattle according to Muslim rites. The only debate was: isn’t cutting still-alive animal’s throat too cruel? Employment, European Union, education, energy, all forgotten. Sarkozy did not get reelected, but people did not stop buying media, which can be seen as a zionist victory.
Sure, there is no formal proof that bad-mouthing muslims is zionist’s work. But given a serie of events or actions all pushing in the same direction, to which extent can they be unrelated? This is the same for terrorism. Since 9/11 every terrorist affair has been crippled with strange facts that make secret services or governement suspicious. My favourite one is the Charlie affair, with the strange suicide of one cop remaining completely unmentioned by national French medias. The total non-respect of official air defence procedures during 9/11 is another subject of amazement. When medias forget to mention obviously suspicious facts, this becomes even more suspicious! Especially when those attacks give a good reason for bombing some country that Israel considers hostile. No doubt that attack of Irak in 2003 could not have happened without 9/11-induced hysteria; for the Charlie affair it is less known that weeks later, French Parliament changed its mind, and decided to send forces to “fight terrorism” in Syria.
While zionists obviously take benefit of such attacks, does it necessarily mean they are part of them? At this point we must have a closer look at the ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia. The latter is a feudal monarchy with families of nomad brigands becoming the most wealthiest people in the world in less than a century. So they did what everybody would: they went nuts, pooing in solid gold toilets and killing demonstrators. What is the likeliness of such a regime of morons surviving more than a few months without foreign help? Zero. How can they openly finance fanatic islamism without the benediction of their supporters? Well this is how the same as asking: how can every perpetrator of terror attack be “well known by French (or UK, or US) secret services”? Of course those terror attacks give a good reason to vote “anti-terrorism” laws that can be used against political opponents.
If the idea of NATO countries supporting criminal activities through Saudi terrorism seems a bit far-fetched, think about the Islamic State. Even the zionist press does not trie to dissimulate the involvment of Saudi Arabia, while avoiding the question of what NATO could have done to prevent that. Furthermore, the Islamic State never took a blast against Israel, only killing Arabs, and destroying Arab cultural legacy. Yemen is another case of Saudi’s mass-murderings remaining unpunished.
With its world-class counter-insurrection industrie (the result of decades of experience in Palestine) and its geographical proximity, Israel is the most qualified to prevent a revolution dethroning the Saudi princes. While the ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia were kept secret and labelled “unthinkable” for years, they started to be public in 2018 (not mentioning intelligence or military aspects, though).
Another benefit for Israel is the “raise of antisemitic events” which is supposed to make french Jews migrate to Israel, which desperatly needs more Jews to populate the colonies. While most of those events are fabricated (like the non-event of Finkelkraut yelled at) they contribute to the hysterical climate helping to dissimulate other important political facts.
So at this point, using only well-known facts (which zionist and alternative media agree on) we have identified a set of events that make no sense, and usually receive no logical explaination. We have built a consistent one with Israel selling an integrated service social control based on muslim-bashing, ranging from everyday hysteria to spreading terrorism, financed by Saudi money.
Of course such a service has a huge cost for its “subscribers”. One is the price tag of attacks of Arab countries by NATO countries. Another one is the loss of markets for French industries. For example, some alternative media mentioned that Peugeot, the French car manufacturer, fired a third of his employees because of the “sanctions” targetting Iran.
At this point, Yellow Jackets created a kind of “service disruption” in zionism-fueled social control. In France there are a lot of rich families who are not ready to pay the financial and political price of zionist dominance if they get nothing in return. As anybody, zionist have only the power that is given to them. Their will to silence Yellow Jackets by calling them “antisemitic” could raise a disturbing question: “Why is debating about wealth sharing antisemitic?” Sadly, almost all non-zionist Jews do not dare to openly dismiss their support to their zionist comrades, who are not afraid to put the whole Jew community on a collision course with the rest of French people.
You nailed it with your observation, ‘Why is discussing wealth-sharing ‘antisemitic’?’ That is the very essence of ‘antisemitism’, the open, honest and non-moronic discussion of Jewish elite financial and other wealth and power under neo-liberal capitalism and US global hegemony. Anyone who dares raise those facts will be attacked as an ‘antisemite’, as Corbyn has been for his ‘Leftwing policies’, defined and denounced as ‘antisemitic’ by one careless and bladder-mouthed UK Jewish grandee as the hysteria got the better of him. As Milton Friedman hissed, ‘Capitalism is good for the Jews’, where he means ‘good for the Jewish elites’, not all Jews (Israel is the second most unequal state in the OECD, even among the Jews, after its obedient ‘friend’, the USA)and most certainly not good, but very bad indeed, for the goyim, save the well-behaved Sabbat Goy stooges.