The Short Version: In a shocker on Jan. 25, the French elite moved to destroy the right-wing candidate, François Fillon with a scandal that may be fake. The elite is clearing the way for their new pawn, Emmanuel Macron, a former Director of Banque Rothschild. Macron’s misdeeds are revealed here. The dissidents shine an unwanted light on the Macron-Rothschild connection and in return, the elite seemed to have gotten the police to put unspecified arrest charges against the well-known dissident Alain Soral. The FN will likely lose the second round of the elections. The Socialists, former pals of the elite, are running fourth in a field of four.
France: Scandal-Shock in the presidential race
Recall that in France, the April/May elections are for just the presidency. Legislative elections will follow in early June, but in the Fifth Republic, the President is extraordinarily powerful and the Senate and Chamber of Deputies are not.
On January 25, the French election campaign was thrown into turmoil when the oligarchs made it known that they had switched support to another candidate than the usual right-winger. Their tricks are quite visible no.
The background ins that France’s globalist elites are in a panic. As elites elsewhere are also in a panic, really. Across Europe in 2017, voters are ready to kick out the oligarchy’s pawns with elections in France, Italy, Germany and perhaps Holland. American just elected an anti-globalist president. That’s Huuuge!!
In France, the oligarchy finds itself cornered, which only happens once or twice a century. The National Front is at record strength, as anti-elite as ever. The French elite enjoyed service from the utterly fraudulent “Socialist” Party since the summer of 1914, but in the last 5 years, the “Socialists” set new records for unpopularity and have little chance of winning elections any time soon, if ever.
Why the Elites Turned on Fillon
A casual observer might think the French oligarchs would be happy with François Fillon, a regular politician from the party now known as Les Républicains. That’s the old UMP, with a fresh name in 2015 but nothing else changed. Fillon was Prime Minister in the right-wing and very pro-American Sarkozy government, 2007-2012. Fillon was a safe bet if the polls can be believed, they showed him winning the second round of elections, the “knock-out round.”
This comes as shock a to people, especially outside France, but the oligarchs have rejected Fillon. A list of his “defects” reveal a stubborn French patriot who defends Christians and family values, who wants French-Russian friendship, and who is not a dyed-in-the-wool Europhile. This ordinary right-wing politician didn’t support the Maastrich Treaty which is a foundational document of the EU. That was 1992, and since then he rebuilt bridges with the Europhile elite, or so people thought. Fillon wants to end the sanctions and he’s also calling for an EU-Russian conference to work out new security arrangements. Fillion is also supportive of Syrian Christians, who have been a main target of the terrorists. In 2015, he spoke at a meeting of 1600 supporters of this endangered minority. (http://www.lepoint.fr/politique/francois-fillon-se-mobilise-pour-les-chretiens-d-orient-24-06-2015-1939424_20.php)
It’s shocking how Christian churches have been so silent on this state-sponsored attack on their coreligionists. That silence means that Fillon has gone out on a limb in opposing the genocide of Christians because the US, France, Saudi Arabia, even Israel are up to their eyeballs in supporting the terrorists.
I could summarize it by quoting Gérard Bardy, current president of the Union de la Presse francophone-France (UPF) and an author of books on Charles De Gaulle. “In my latest book, “De Gaulle was Right, – The Vissionary” (Ed. Télémaque), I do not hesitate to say that F rançois is, to this day, the only heir to Gaullisme.” ( www.facebook.com/groups/161767340689246/ )
The oligarchs schemed quietly fo two years to build a brand-new candidate to oppose Fillon, but the immediate trigger may have been an interview which Fillon gave to both Le Monde and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, published January 22, so 3 days before January 25, when The Chained Duck quacked its bombshell allegation. ( http://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2017/01/22/francois-fillon-je-propose-une-alliance-europeenne-de-defense_5066975_3210.html )
January 25 the elite’s chosen date to rock France with this scandal. Le Canard Enchaîné claiming that Fillon, as a Senator put his wife and two adult children on his expense account as his aides. There is no doubt they were paid from his parliamentary expense account. This type of nepotism is common practice among French politicians on the left and on the right. The salaries are in the public record and it’s legal. This nepotism is only illegal if the relatives didn’t work to earn their salaries. At time of this writing, Fillon’s supporters claim there is no evidence He did anything illegal, and they say it’s all cooked up.
The oligarchs could have uncorked the scandal at any time in the last 20 years. They could have uncorked it before the LR primary of Nov. 20 and 27, which would have caused the victory of Nicholas Sarkozy. Why not December 1, after their favored candidate didn’t win ? The oligarchs were clever and disciplined. They waited out December and most of January so their scandal would gain the greatest effect. When Le Canard Enchaîné ran the scandal on Jan. 25, Les Républicains didn’t have enough time to replace Fillon with someone else. Alain Juppé, the runner-up in November understand what was afoot, that the oligarchs support Macron, so he ruled himself out of a second chance to be the LR candidate.
Even if the charge were true, it’s worth noting how artificial this scandal really is, because that artificiality reveals a deeper truth. This routine scandal has been magnified and allowed to be sat on, probably for many years, which would support a suspicion that the scandal was cooked up. It’s also crucial to keep the sense of scale. This scandal, if it’s true, cost French taxpayers €800,000 over ten years. By contrast, as w will see below, Macron’s scandal cost France at least €9 billion, so 100 times greater. The only way the oligarchs could inflate this relatively small account-padding into a career-destroying mega-story is because the elites own all of the mass media and have the power to turn any story into whatever size they want. This sizing is only partially based on the collective gullibility of their readers. Gullibility can be overcome with more repetition, as Goebbels noted in the 1940’s. To rephrase, compare €80,000 a year to the €14 billion a year revenues of Alstom’s power division, described below.
Emmanuel Macron, Director at Banque Privee Edmond de Rothschild S.A.
When the oligarchs pushed out Fillon, it became undeniable that Macron is their man, but in fact the process to create Macron the Candidate started two years ago.
Who is Macron ? Until he resigned on August 30, 2016, he was the «Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances» a second-tier post where he is best knows for a labor law which cuts salaries, allows employers to demand work on Sunday, and the usual right-wing stuff, but his greater importance is his contribution to the de-industrialization of France, where the giant, Alston was sold off to its American rival GE for a song). But since Macron also spent years as a Director at Banque Rothschild, he became a puppet of the rich and powerful, and they can work magic and turn Macron into a temporary somebody.
Macron and his Rothschild connection is really bad news for the French. Here is why:
The last time the Rothschilds put a puppet into the presidential office, it was to overthrow the great President Charles De Gaulle, who had become anti-imperialist. At the time, all the American Lügenpresse told us was that he kicked NATO out of France. In reality, De Gaulle’s offenses were far greater. Few Americans known that he used the prestige of his office to oppose the US wars in Southeast Asia. His speech in Phnom Penh, Cambodia (Sept. 1, 1966) is breathtaking in its deep and eloquent denunciation of the American Empire. A French transcript of that speech is at http://www.charles-de-gaulle.org/pages/l-homme/accueil/discours/le-president-de-la-cinquieme-republique-1958-1969/discours-de-phnom-penh-1er-septembre-1966.php The most important offense is that De Gaulle, as a French patriot, was not interested in a European Union where France would lose her sovereignty, and De Gaulle had managed to Make France Great Again with a strong economy based on industrial competitiveness. The cherry on the top was his remark that “Some people even feared that the Jews, until then scattered about, but who were still what they had always been, that is an elite people, sure of themselves and domineering, would, once assembled again on the land of their ancient greatness, turn into a burning and conquering ambition.” (press conference, Nov. 27, 1967 – in the wake of the 1967 War). The elites decided De Gaulle had to go.
The chosen tool was Georges Pompidou. Like Macron, Pompidou was a relative nobody, but he was a former Director-General of Banque Rothschild. Behind-the-scenes support was vital for Pompidou to stage an insider revolt against Charles De Gaulle. Once Pompidou became president, he gave La Banque de France over to private bankers in early 1973. Dissidents scathingly call the legislation «la Loi Pompidou, Giscard, Rothschild». Destroying the Bank Of France was a huge treason. From 1936-1973, the sovereign French government ran its Bank of France to serve the public. The government borrowed money for public works at little or no interest. Bank policies were designed to grow the economy. Public Banking. It was the key to creating “The Glorious Thirty”, the 30 years of postwar economic growth and prosperity (1945-1975). Stripping France of its national bank killed off that prosperity in a few short years.
So Pompideou stands as a great warning. When a Rothschild pawn is running for high office, the people should be very concerned about what comes next. Unfortunately, the French Lügenpresse swept all that under the rug and turned De Gaulle into first a bogeyman, and later a remote icon of history. The only people who bring to light how this is relevant today, and how France needs another De Gaulle are the French dissidents which I discuss below.
The French business press has mentioned that Macron was a Director of Banque Rothschild, but this is not much discussed. Only the dissidents give it the prominence it deserves.
The French public know two big bad things about Macron. Alstom and the Macron Law which attacks labor. The third, the Rothschild connection lies hidden in plain view.
Because the Macron Law it affects all working people in France, the polemics around it have attracted widespread attention. It allows top-down changes to labor contracts with the consent of whichever trade union represents 50% of the workers. It abolished the restrictions on Sunday work, an important item and a serious blow to family life – a strategic goal of anti-humanist liberals, since strong families are a basic protection against predatory capitalism. It ends the 35 hour work week and allow companies to demand 46 hours work for up to 12 weeks a year. This law is another attack on the working class, with the propaganda that it will increase employment.
Macron wrote this law, but in an endless string of frauds, the French media call it la Loi El Khomri even though El Khomri, the Labor Minister, didn’t help write it and seems to have opposed it. (fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myriam_El_Khomri) Macron says long and loud that he would have gone much further in this law, if political realities hadn’t restrained him.
The Alstom matter is more serious, really.
Macron’s role in the sell-off of Alstom is very strategic damage. It de-industrializes France.
With his portfolio in the “Socialist” government, Macron should have worked to prevent the sell-off of Alstom to GE. This stands as a second clear warning that Rothschild puppets can inflict serious damage.
Alstom was one of France’s few remaining high-tech dynamos, a key to French prosperity in the 21st Century. Nuclear reactors, high speed trains, electricity transmission, etc. GE has a similar set of industries, so the American giant offered to buy the nuclear power and electrical transmission part of Alstom for €12.35 billion, but not the train business. That was a paltry sum for businesses with an annual turnover of over €14 billion. Any businessman would understand GE’s initial offer as a fire sale price – but Alstom was not in distress. Even worse, after all the flim-flam such as a US Department Of “Justice” fine ($970 million) for bribing Indonesian officials, French share-holders ended up with less than €3.7 billion. French people made a public outcry and an effort to prevent losing this jewel, but to no avail. Macron should have prevented this catastrophe, and he did nothing because he’s a neoliberal with masters to please and – amazing at is seems – his French masters serve American masters. The American website, Counterpunch, ran a detailed story on Alstom two months ago, although it failed to highlight the role of Macron as the most responsible “Socialist” minster. Link:
Emmanuel Macron, the Candidate
In the last two years, the oligarchic press, the French Lügenpresse, has been trying to turn the nobody Macron into a major candidate, creating a big PR campaign. The French website Le Vent Se Leve (The Wind Rises) has a good short exposé at http://lvsl.fr/medias-ont-fabrique-candidat-macron “How The Medias Fabricated Macron The Candidate”. The exposé note that more articles were published about Macron than all three of the other “Socialist” candidates combined, a peer group that included Hamonthe “Socialist” presidential candidate. Polling data from before this campaign started, in late 2014, shows only 6% of the public considered Macron as a serious candidate. The way the glossy press portrayed him, you’d think the 1970’s pop star, Johnny Halliday, was being created all over again. Minus the good mood music and the Ford Mustang driving-on-the-beach commercial, however.
In April 2016, Macron started a political movement,“En Marche”, and it was clear he was preparing for a presidential run and he was soliciting campaign money. When he resigned on Aug. 30, President Hollande called him “a methodical traitor” so the bridge to the “Socialist” Party was truly burned. What’s curious, so odd and artificial, is that Macron waited until November 16 to announce his run for the presidency. That delay indicates Macron has run a stealth campaign.
Macron’s ties to Rothschild are in the French media if you know to search it out, but the ties don’t get the prominence and the analysis that it should. The Lügenpresse describes Macron as an “independent centrist.” He is “independent” of everything – except the oligarchs. “Centrist”? Really ? No, this label is as meaningless in France as anywhere. There’s only one polite label for Macron; he is a neoliberal. That means fundamentalist capitalism where, without exaggeration, nothing matters except the accumulation of capital.
Alain Soral, the Dissident Who Must Be Silenced
The critical importance of the French dissidents is that they make the connection between Macron and Rothschild, as well as Pompidou to Rothschild. The dissidents are the only people in France who describe 1968 as a Color Revolution created by hidden networks, and the dissidents also lead the way in describing De Gaulle as a great patriot, when the mass media tries to paint him as an authoritarian nut, just some obscure old general. A lot hinges on how people evaluate “1968”. It was sold, then and now, as being spontaneous, anti-authoritarian, romantic, etc. It was a great sales job and only the dissidents unravel the marketing of “May, 1968”.
The dissidents are a major force in France. Their main power is word of mouth. They are sprinkled throughout France, at most income levels and ethnicities, so they can bend the ear of non-political French citizens. I estimate there are about 250,000 dissidents, and obviously Alain Soral one of the most prominent. The main dissident web site is egaliteetreconciliation.fr/ and it averages 144,000 unique visitors a day. Almost none of this is in English. This is French nationalism at work and one of their goals is preservation of French culture and French language.
If ever the French oligarchs needed to suppress the dissidents, it’s now. The arguments of the dissidents are strong, but their biggest obstacle has been the passivity of the French people. Passivity is ending in France as it is elsewhere. So the elite decided it was time to call in the police.
The French police have been trying to arrest Alain Soral since Thursday, Feb. 2. The police haven’t stated why they want to arrest him, but the leaders of the “Socialist” government have said in just so many words, that they want to permanently silence Soral and Dieudonné. To quote Valls, the recently departed prime minister, “Death! … Uh, I mean social death!” So yeah, the oligarchs want the dissidents silenced for the duration of the elections.
Soral and fellow dissidents have been on the receiving end of a concerted campaign of intimidation with arrests and trumped-up civil suits. This has been going on for a decade and it’s a case of attempted
murder social death by a thousand cuts. It drains the dissidents of money and energy.
Unlike the US, France does not have free speech. Some topics can’t be discussed openly without fear of arrest. Comments which can be interpreted as racist, as “hate speech”, or as “supporting terrorism”, or merely as revisions of details from the official history of the Holocaust, or simply annoying a few well-connected Jews, are all prosecutable under French law. In the US, back in the old days when free speech was not all that free, we had gray zones for artistic license, for humor, and for speaking when reporters were not present. France never developed these gray zones because they had free speech from 1881 until the new laws of 1972 and 1990 slowly crept up on them.
One example can give you an idea how this works. Dieudonné, an Afro-French humorist fills large halls at all his performances, at 50 Euro a ticket. He’s extremely talented, insightful, and his humor is gentle and fierce. This is all too dangerous and subversive. For a Facebook posting, he was sentenced to 200 days in jail or 30,000 Euros fine, reduced on appeal to 2 months or 10,000 Euros. After the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack, he posted, «Je me sens Charlie Coulibaly.» “I feel like Charlie Coulibaly.” It was a hybrid name. Charlie for Charlie-Hebdo, the humor magazine where the victims had worked. Like Dieudonné , they had been humorists, and Dieudonné understood that not everyone likes funny men. Coulibaly, supposedly one of the terrorists, was AfroFrench. Well, Dieudonné is Afro-French, too. Dieudonné said he was trying to do the Christian thing and to lovingly reconcile these two opposites which he said he also finds within himself. He told the court that he “condemned the terrorist attack, holding back nothing, and without any ambiguity.” The upshot is that in France, the government decides what’s funny.
Soral’s Views On The Election
In an interview on Saturday, Alain Soral had some interesting comments. https://youtu.be/Yl2TBBy3HII
Soral says the globalists are very concerned after Trump’s election and “the loss of America”. They believe they have no choice but to hold on to France «à tout prix», “at any cost.” He says the Empire is in panic mode because Hamon, Fillon, and the FN are all against the globalists.
Soral says the “globalist oligarchy” expected and wanted Juppé to win the LR primary. For them, Fillon is “too French, too Catholic, and not submissive towards the Empire.” He notes that the attacks on Fillon are coming from the globalist right-wing, not – as you’d expect – from the left. The globalists see Fillon, even with his Bilderberger membership, as a member of the “grande bourgeoisie” and too close to Putin. So the oligarchs need Macron and they are doing everything to puff up Macron “who incarnates the candidate of the Empire.” Soral says Macron is a nobody, an of course the Empire magnifies Macron’s small accomplishments into the serious doings of a serious candidate, the same as they did with Manuel Valls before they had to dump him Easily made, easily broken, like a pie in the Mary Poppins musical.
Let me end this essay by asking what the polls do or do not reveal. First what do the polls say, and then the question of their credibility.
Broadly, the polls claim that Marine Le Pen will be the victor in the first round, with 29% or so of the vote. But in the second and decisive round, she will be defeated, either by Macron with 66% of the vote, or by Fillon with 58%. These are approximate numbers from an assortment of polls. So all the polls say the NF will not gain the presidency.
However, it’s a serious question to ask if these polls are credible. The American pollsters lied outrageously during the 2016 campaign. I hindsight, we can see this was a cross-organizational attempt to create an electoral reality with the use of well-coordinated lying. This stunt was also international and crossed channels. Three weeks before the elections, Paddy Power, an Irish betting firm, “called the election” for Clinton and paid off all the bets on her, saying there was no point in waiting. They paid out a few million needlessly. One can only speculate how Paddy Power was reimbursed, in cash or in more favorable treatment of internet betting,; it’s trivial, really. So the manipulation of perceptions is not just a theory, it’s a fact.
A history of honesty isn’t worth a lot in a very high stakes situation, which is what we have here.
French polls must raise and then answer three questions. First, were citizens really candid with pollsters who represent the establishment ? Second, which people will actually go to the voting urns, and third, how can the pollsters estimate the stay-at-homes ?
At the March, 2014 municipal elections, French voters stayed home in record numbers, causing a tidal wave of losses for the “Socialists”. They lost towns they had held for 100 years. The polls were wrong because voters boycotted the “Socialist” Party that ignored the working people. In 2014, the FN only gained 2 or 3 towns and a modest number of seats. But in the last 3 years, as the economic crisis grinds on, the FN has gained voters and more legitimacy. So it’s harder to rule out an FN victory.
There’s no need to mention Jean-Luc Mélenchon, of the Left Party. Fringe leftists get more coverage than they have electoral prospects.
François Fillon is the only hope to France to gain its independence.
No, not Fillon, France’s last hope would rather be François Asselineau (UPR).
Your interpretation is upside down and backwards.
The French elite have chosen a lightning rod ‘Rothschild’ banker to guarantee the victory of Front National.
Did the British Rothschild establishment miss a beat after Brexit? I think not. They both expected and wanted the final result.
Plus ca change.
Ah, so the hated ‘Rothschild’ banker will lose the French election just like the hated ‘Goldman Sachs’ sponsored Hillary Clinton lost in the USA. I would love to see it happen. Can we expect Le Pen to bypass the French media and rely on Twitter?
Britain has no industry, and it offers the world nothing except for dead white authors, Mr. Bean, and BBC nature documentaries. (Does parasitic banking count?) Nigel Farage had a dream that the British could leave the EU and achieve a partial resuscitation of the British Empire – A British free trade block. How else can Britain compete against the Russia/China axis and the new Silk Road?
British live off money laundering which they call financial services. Stolen wealth from worldwide is pouring into england because that country guarantees the criminals of world immunity from prosecution for their crime of looting their own countries wealth.
To the point summary.
Interesting graphic heading the article here. The aircraft seen through the windows is a Boeing B-17 (WW2 era american bomber). The words in the upper right look like they say “Malaysia Airlines Flight 117”.
As for the article, obviously macron is toxic, anyone associated with the rothschild freakshow is by default. The French could use some “Russian hackers” to expose macron.
Art and a better picture:
The tail of the B-17 has the Ukrainian emblem on it. B-17-MH17?
The aircraft at front looks more like an SU-25.
August 2014 analysis
Note the insignia on the tail of the jet visible beyond the window.
This was an art work (can’t recall the artist’s name just now) done in memory of MH17, shot down over the Ukraine a couple years ago.
Sanctuary One got the artist’s name right. It’s Amely Rose and the title is “Flight MH17”.
It’s one of the iconic images of the war.
Another iconic image is the Gorlovka Madonna, two photographs of a mother with her child still in her arms, lying on the ground and both of them dead. I think this site has the highest resolution: https://photolium.ru/disasters-tragedy/595-gorlovka-tragedy-woman-child-killed.html
The back end is an SU-25 too:
You’re right, it is an Su-25. Thanks.
On that note and understanding this is symbolic artistic expression I have wondered about another theory which, with the little I know, I’d give less than a 1% probability. Certainly an Su-25 can reach 10,000 meters but wouldn’t need to -a launch from 6 or 7,000 meters of a medium air-to-air missile would work fine.
But let’s assume MH17 was hit from a ground launched BUK and it came from the ‘rebel’ single BUK launcher touted by the West. No, I don’t believe this but let’s follow through. A single BUK launcher can target local low flying aircraft but cannot hit aircraft at 10,000 meters without the use of the larger long-range radar on another dedicated BUK vehicle and yet another BUK vehicle acting as a command post.
This is my understanding thus far.
However we do know that Ukrainian BUK radars were very active according to Russian sources.
Is it possible then that ‘rebels’ launched the captured BUK against one of those low flying Ukrainian Antonov transports or one of their SU-25, SU-27s that were buzzing around according to Russian radar and local witnesses, but the Ukrainian BUK radar/command vehicle locked onto MH17 and re-directed the BUK missile. This could either be accidental or diabolical.
Has anyone discussed this theory and is it technically possible?
It was a fairly clear day. Wheres the smoke trail?
Yes, agree it’s troubling and have already discussed BUK trail and noise at great length etc.etc. but I am looking at this small possibility here and hoping for a technical answer.
In article linked below is lot’s of info collected by Joe Quinn. Included is a photo of the Israeli modified SU-25 (cockpit view).
At the time some of us did forensic photo analysis on many aspects of this incident, I recall that there are/were two, or three Israeli modified/rebuild SU-25’s stationed in Georgia who has pressure cabins oxygen masks, etc. and specifically modified for flying at high altitudes.
Somewhere on one of my computers or external hard drives I have some photos and technical details.
Yes, the Israeli Python missile would fit the bill nicely from what I read much earlier but that Georgia scenario, while a possibility, does raise furher questions. e.g. an SU-25 is not exactly stealthy and although theoretically could fly from Georgia along the Black Sea and back (or ditch) it would have to pass by a lot of Russia -and there’s a lot of electronic eyes by Crimea these days. I think It would have had to come crated by sea and/or perhaps via Turkey and assembled in Ukraine.
I can see wanting to update avionics etc. but another small question is why a ground attack aircraft could justify expensive pressurisation upgrades needed for high altitude flight. Other than for MH17 or pilot comfort, the only one that I can think of is to extend range.
Israeli-made air-to-air missile may have downed MH17 – report
Article about probable israeli python a-a missile impact on MH-17. I remember reading some other material back then on some Ukrainian Su-25s which had been modified to use this missile and that the Ukraine had the missile in stock.
The variant you seem to be discussing is the SU-25KM, built in Georgia with Israeli avionics capable of firing the Python 5 AAM. Here’s a video from 2009 promoting the model for export in English with Israeli made Elbit systems for the heads up display. The actual pilot — likely Georgian and loyal to Misha Saakashvili — who shot down MH17 not the Ukrainian who was fingered in Russian media and denied it only had to hear the growl in his headset and push a button. The Python 5s both of them did the rest and killed the MH17 pilots instantly. I strongly suspect FSB/GRU/SVR and Georgian intelligence all know the identity of the Georgian pilot, and he may very well have been offered asylum in Russia, even if he may be in Israel or another third country for his own safety by now since the SBU wouldn’t hesitate to kill such a witness even in Tblisi.
The SU25KM was indeed detected, Russian military radars saw it, even if there may’ve been some jamming going on to degrade the value of civil radar from Rostov and the Dnepro tower that Kholomoisky and the SBU agents quickly swept was too far away to see anything other than MH17 dropping off, since the jet came from under its radar horizon after hanging out around 5,000 feet or less. Today after the Russians turned over their civil radars from Rostov tower the Dutch Joint Investigate Team has claimed it’s in a format they cannot process and accused the Russians of scrubbing it. The mil radar is being held back IMO and not provided to the Dutch as blackmail material against Porky and now the U.S. Deep State. I think Putin’s ace up his sleeve regarding who really shot down MH17 has been a factor in quietly backing the Deep State down from the attempted no fly zone they badly wanted to start implementing in Syria, even ahead of what they feared would be a Hillary defeat and transition to Trump.
John Helmer at Dances with Bears has done the research into the near total absence of BUK shrapnel in the pilot and co-pilots bodies, the latter’s head and torso revealed to be perfectly intact by his sister after they opened the casket in Malaysia. The Malaysian Airlines co-pilot’s sister made those remarks on the RT documentary ‘MH17: A Year Without Truth’. IMO the explosive force of the BUK detonating within 1 meter of the cockpit window or the shrapnel blast should’ve torn the co-pilot to shreds/turned him into bloody meat (like a large grenade/RPG or mortar round going off nearby would do — a BUK warhead is something like 80 kg of HE packed around shrapnel). Instead the damage is more consistent with a smaller warhead (though still very powerful in terms of pound for pound ‘punch’) AAM warhead of the Python 5 type.
I posted this before, but it is still relevant.
The Georgian Defense Minister at the time of the Russian/Georgian war was a twenty-nine year old Isreli.
He was responsible for for setting up a bilateral trade deal in arms between Georgia and Israel, where Jewish Georgian ex-pats had been drumming up support in Israel.
The chances of a foreigner – here Israeli – being appointed to such a key position as Defence being ‘personal’ rather than ‘political’ seem pretty slim to me.
I suspect his appointment was a condition of USrael support for Saakashvilli.
I had always assumed that Israel’s military support for Georgia was in order to secure a lily-pad airbase for attacking Iran. It’s a much shorter trip via Turkey, Armenia or Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea to Tehran than from Israel. Probably via US/NATO Turkey as the USA would, just like the Maidan, ‘midwife’ it at the very least.
The message mentioned in the article was made very clear -the drone footage of that Russian jet deliberately circling in from the left and a frontal launch of the missile to assure its visibility zooming in at you to impact is classic.
Given Trump’s posturing against Iran it will be interesting to see if there is renewed military support by Israel for Georgia or whether that bridge was irrevocably burned.
Jewish investigate reporter Christopher Bollyn pointed finger in an article from 2014, against Israel for having orchestrated the MH17 shotdown. The article now seems deleted from Bollyns homepage but can be read at the below links:
The Downing of MH17 – Is Israel Involved?
The Israeli Photo of MH17 – Who Is Yaron Mofaz?
Thank you for your valuable comment.
For all. In case you haven’t seen this one.
”American just elected an anti-globalist president. That’s Huuuge!!” This is a joke
It’s an open question whether Trump will do any good or not. There are 3 things worth noting here.
1. The USA was not about to elect anyone who is obviously anti-imperialist. If we got someone who is simply a nationalist, as Trump claims to be, that would be a major gift from the heavens.
2. The unremitting hostility of George Soros is a moral compass. If he’s for it, I’m against it. He only spends money to make bad things happen, something which I was years late in realizing.
3. If you think that Trump is playing an extremely high stakes game, you can arrive at vastly different conclusions than if you believe this is all normal politics. One example: How does one interpret the action of James Comey, head of the FBI, when last August, he said that H. Clinton had, and I’ll paraphrase, “done some bad stuff” (which anyone with half a brain could see amounted to a series of felonies), but, Comey said, the FBI was not going to seek prosecution. He commented, on a different occasion as I recall, that he wanted to keep the FBI out of the business of picking presidents. Now the question you have to ask yourself is, “Was this was the least he could have done, or was it the most he could have done ?” In other words, did Comey roll over and submit to the Clinton campaign, or did he do all he could to tell the truth without his own career (and perhaps his own life) being over ? If the stakes are so high that he could have been hounded out of public life for offending Clinton and her entourage, then you might conclude he did all he could. Scott Adams discussed this last August at http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-07/dilbert-creator-calls-fbi-director-hero-heres-why If it’s a very high stakes situation, then you tend to think Trump’s priority is to get his nominees approved by a partly-hostile Congress. voltairenet.org, has a similar analysis, available in several languages.
What has the trump regime actually done to improve anything? I don’t mean images and sound bites.
Report: Trump Called Obama-Era Nuclear Reduction Treaty a Bad Deal on Putin Call
“Sources inside the White House have revealed that US President Donald Trump paused to ask aides what the New START treaty was, during a call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, before telling Putin it was one in a string of bad deals completed by the Obama administration.
During a presidential debate, Trump said New START was an example of where Russia had “outsmarted” the US. He also referred to the treaty as “START-up,” during a debate against Hillary Clinton.”
Note pence was part of the call and the one telling trump what to say. The difference between pence and clinton is on which bum cheek they chose for their israeli flag tattoo.
The question I ask myself is:
If Trump – or anyone else – were to try to overthrow the full-spectrum control of the USA by the ZWO, how would he go about it?
Putin, in a certain sense, had a great advantage here. He had the privilege to lay the ground work for his breathtaking effort to restore Russia in the walled-off secret service world, well protected from the Fifth Column sharks, that were – and are – out to get him.
During the first ten years of the era Putin, the world hardly took notice of him and by the time he ascended to world stardom status during the Ukraine crises, all the pieces of his power basis were well in place and Team Putin ready to take on any challenges.
Trump – if he were for real – faces completely different, far more complex, and maybe insurmountable tasks.
Filling his cabinet with lots of GoldmanSachs and Army people might be a early sign of sell-out or the only way to go forward. Kicking up a lot of dust and thus creating an sandstorm that confuses and blinds everybody might be utter foolishness or could be sublime trickster tactics. And so on.
Interesting times ahead.
Jeff Sessions is one and because of this: He is going to go after the drug cartels
see this analysis that advocates that Sessions must go after the drug laundering banks
at the top of Dope Inc.
Thanks for the informative article. I am always impressed how the public falls for these fake scandals. I wonder how many EU MP’s employ their absent wives and or misstresses
Alstom is spelt Alston once.
You just have to know that he is suspect especially with the fawning and widespread coverage given to him by the (((MSM))) .
Everything seems so carefully chereographed.
The act of ass-kissing comes naturally to many people. No need for choreography any longer.
Very informative, many thanks!
It clearly shows that the zionazi regime behind the scenes is purely fascist and will stop at nothing.
Great article, Cosimo. Thanks.
What is happening in France right now is a form of soft coup, comparable to what took place in Brazil last year.
The élection is being played right now, not when we will vite in april/may
Fillion has been designated for a “take down” similar to that proposed by Shai Masot from Israel’s UK Embassy, for Britsh politicians not keen on distinguishing themselves as “friends of Israel”.
France cozying up to Russia or distancing itself from the EU are not policies that French elites want the next president to pursue.
«Le Capitaine Dreyfus est bien plus grand que le Capitaine Bonaparte. Il a conquis la France et il l’a gardée.»
Same the Rothschilds. Can the French renounce their ‘Château Mouton Rothschild’, their ‘Château Lafite Rothschild’? For Mélenchon?
‘For them, Fillon is “too French, too Catholic, and not submissive towards the Empire.”’
The global elites are determined to destroy 1000 years of Christianity and French culture in France. They will live like greedy sultans in their gated communities while the “great unwashed” masses starve outside the gates. Welcome to the global plantation.
Why would the French elites import millions of African Muslims to use as cheap labor in France when they could simply implement a free trade agreement and move the factories to Algeria. Or is this already happening? Perhaps all of the GE products made in China, Vietnam, or elsewhere in southeast Asia and then shipped to France.
De-industialization in proceeding in France as planned. In a few more years, France will have nothing to offer the world except for wine – That is, if anyone bothers with French wine anymore
China has “…more vineyards than France”
“In a few more years, France will have nothing to offer the world except for wine”
À mon avis, c’est honteux d’insinuer de telles choses — un affront à la France. Voilà: En plus de vin, la France complètement sionisée va briller — comme elle l’a toujours fait — surtout par ses penseurs, ses savants, et ses artistes: BHL et Charlie Hebdo :-)
“They will live like greedy sultans in their gated communities while the “great unwashed” masses starve outside the gates. Welcome to the global plantation.”
And this is how much of the third world already is, from Johannesburg to Guatemala City to Mumbai.
Personally I hate French wine and their Champagne. It is not good on the pallet and takes to your head the next day like a 2 x 4 piece of wood. Ironically, their beer is quite good and their cider, room temp from Northern France is also very good.
As for Wine or Champagne, Germany, Southern Europe or Eastern Europe please. Like my Georgian and Crimean Reds. ))
Do like French Cars though and it is a shame to see the country like the rest of EU being de-industrialised. What they have done to Eastern EU countries is now happening in the Western Core EU countries as the parasites turn on their creation and suck the life blood out. Maybe we will all be like Bulgaria in a decade’s time if the EU survives on Brussels current path.
You may hate French wine, the problem is that the French love it and feel offended if you disparage it. Imagine how they would feel if they would have to stop serving it not to offend their ‘halal’ compatriots.
Oh no! Not another Zionist Jew! Are there no more French Men and Women patriots left in France. France stopped being French with the accession of Sarkozy the First.
And so it is, and so it has ever been …. and, alas, so it will ever be
The ‘Elite’ have always controlled the ‘masses’
Essentially because they are smart and they have lots of smart people working for them because they can buy them, whereas the masses have to rely on someone who is equally as smart to lead them AND who has enough principal to say no to the wealth the elite can offer them to defect.
Herman Goering understood the nature of the power of the elite:
‘Naturally, the common people don’t want war … but after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.’
Think about the ‘dogs of war’ barking at the moment.
The ‘masses’ in the ‘west’ are restless, we know we are being royally screwed, but what to do??
This article clearly exposes the power of the ‘elite’ in France
I think that President Trump loves his family ….. and probably quite likes his life …… will he have courage to stand up for the ‘little man’?
I noted that Obama flew into the sky with flames shooting out his arse …. he was awarded a nobel prize for hope …. then ……………. nothing ……………. silence ………….. business as usual
He too, loved his family.
For us, the great unwashed, a roof over our head, a family, food, friends ….. we are happy with that, as the years after WWII showed.
The current bunch of hyenas who are the ‘elite’ even begrudge us that …..
What to do?
1. Trash the global money religion an its god Mammon for good.
2. Build a society that gives all basic needs for free to anyone participating in it.
3. Dump the political laziness and the leaders to set your rules yourself.
@, so it will ever be
Actually, the masses are always controlled by the elites. It couldn’t be otherwise. Masses are masses. The only difference is which elites control them.
Western Capitalism is sham and an illusion. The reality of capitalism is very miserable but this system has the ability to masquerade all this misery into false promises that rarely became real.
Soviet style Socialism offered much more to the population and guaranteed the satisfaction of the basic needs of the population. Free education/healthcare/housing and a guaranteed stable job as well many other concessions (cheap affordable public transport etc) in a crime free environment. With the soviet style economy, USSR became a world superpower. After the end of USSR and the transition to capitalism, Russian economy and society were devastated with poverty and inequality all around.
During Cold War, it is true that western governments offered some welfare benefits to their populace and they initiated some economic planning. This was necessary to avoid a revolution and to compete with USSR. After the end of USSR, the western welfare states came to an end and neoliberalism became the norm. The western elites had nothing to fear.
France during the De Gaul era followed a system of significant state ownership of means of production as well as indicative planing of the economy. It was called Dirigisme. All these policies were reversed as we moved into the era of neoliberal globalisation. Today there is de-industrialisation, mass unemployment, low wages, instability, crime and other social problems. Le pen’s National Front supports a reversal of this decline through a return to a strong dirigiste economic policy and the withdrawal from NATO – EU -EURO (which is of course a precondition for any meaningful change in economic policies).
What was granted for free during soviet times, is now a luxury during our times.
Westerners borrow huge loans and pay exorbitant amounts for small cramped apartments as there is a real estate bubble in so many of the western cities. Wages have not risen according to the cost of life and the house prices. In many western countries, education and health care is not free. Jobs are scarce, and good jobs even scarcer.
Things will be worse and worse unless there is a radical revolutionary change.
Very few people can see the connection between the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the open Globalist thrust for world domination, the obscene wealth accumulation by financial capitalism and the immiseration of the masses.
The mask of “benign” capitalist democracy was on only because there was a living and successful alternative to capitalism; once gone, there is no need or fear to remove the mask and we are now looking at its gloomy and brutal face.
I’m afraid the late realisation of what has taken place in the last quarter of a century is not going to change anything. The Global financial elite are so confident of their grip on power to the point of not caring or bother with the “petits riens” of elections and a pretence of democracy because nothing will change – a la Tweedledee Tweedledam . They lulled us into apathy and insensitivity by feeding our egos with the crumbs of entertainment and consumerism (and drugs) paid by sweat and debts and the constant image that the “western” proles were a privileged lot compared with the appalling poverty of the “others”. Perhaps very soon we will be the “others – after all, it has started already in the slums of Europe.
Blame Trump and le Pen for the inevitable collapse ; not a bad strategy.
My Mum grew up in France with her Dad and his Mum immediately after WWI. She was brought up as a French peasant girl..But she is not French. She was born in England and both her Mum and Dad were born in Scotland.
I grew up in Oldham Lancashire, England and a lot of my school friends had surnames like Siekierowski and – well I don’t like to mention my girlfreinds surnames – but I can still remember them…
And my surname is quite obviously French
But England invited all us Refugees over the last 500 years or so – and We all Think we are English and largely get on fine,
We aren’t Racist..We don’t care about the colour of your skin – nor any religious or political nonsense you believe in – so long as you are friendly and nice – and have a sense of humour – such that we can laugh and joke and jam. We don’t care – if you are a good bloke or a nice girl…… You boys and girls are on our side..We don’t want to fight with you – we just want to be friends with your sister (in my case – well she is rather beautiful)
What the hell are the rest of The World Fighting about?
Have any of you been to the USA?? and some of them confess. Yes we have…
Yeh O.K. – but you all came back to England didn’t you?
The Americans are nothing much to do with us British either.
If they all spoke Russian instead of English you wouldn’t blame us British wouldn’t you?
Nah… Us Britiish would blame you Russians for their Bad Behaviour.
But you have got to go with what you’ve got haven’t you?
We haven’t got a quarrel with any of you. Can’t you all just tell The Americans to Behave!!! Too?
“guess who- american woman”
I think my Scottish grandmother did as much as any woman could do under the circumstances when the insanity of WW1 started. First of all she got her youngest two children including my Mum – on a ship to New Zealand – and she sent letters to her husband (my Grandad)
But still he would not stop – so she came back from New Zealand to England – by this time my Mum had just started walking..
She wrote a letter to him – are you going to stop this insanity or what??
Cos you maybe a senior british officer herding many Thousands of British Kids to their almost certain death in the French fields of The Somme…
But You have 6 children at home in England..and They are now Your responsibility.. Stop fighting. Come home and look after them – cos I am Off.
My Grandmother left them all – my Mum was only two years old.
She wanted to save her Husband’s Life.
She had done everything else she could think of to stop the war.
So she left them all – and went to Africa to be a Medical Missionary.
My Mum hated her all her life – but completely Loved Her Dad.
I took her to see her Mum’s grave in Hertfordshire England.
My eldest sister took her to see – where she grew up in Northern France and her Dad’s grave.
Now what exactly were all these people fighting for 1914-1918
What exactly did they achieve?
My Grandad taught music before WWI and when he knew he was certain to die – he had no musical instruments – but he did have a pen and paper – and he wrote the notes and the music down for his 2 year old daughter..and my Niece also a musician and researcher found the note and played it to his daughter on her 80th Birthday.
He survived WWI too – but then died when she was 10.
She was just a French peasant girl.
She is my Mum.
My girlfriend just loved her.
We took her on holidays with us – even before we had got married and had kids.
Everyone loved my Mum especially our kids.
She chose to spend the last few years of her life close to where she came from.
In London with my wife and kids.
We were honoured.
My wife is an angel too
Nice story Tony. Your grandmother was a great woman; very few of us could do such thing (saying no to war at great personal loss), even now.
Today I got some Macron spam in my mailbox from some EU news site. Looks like the EU is helping him.
I wish people could pledge to unite behind any candidate that opposes Macron. Even as a casual observer I see that he came out of nowhere, with a “movement” or march that is nothing but the steadfast march of global capital over the productive elements of French society.
The people are so easily fooled, know so damn little about political life and eat up everything their media throws at them as long as they live comfortable lives.
But my god, I don’t want to suffer cause of them, so do your best to try and convince your your leftist friends to vote for Fillion or Le Pen, and you rightists to vote for Hamon or Fillion. It’s only 4 years with some different policies as opposed to the radical restructuring of society to the detriment of the 99% under Macron.
Note to commentator … we are here to discuss ideas and event not to belittle other commentators … your post has been edited …. mod-hs
Melenchon who has very sensible policies, even concerning immigration and is polling stronger than the socialist candidate, closing in on Macron. He is as Fringe left and Le Pen is Fringe right.
And I remember an article in one of the intellectual neo liberal papers of France that compared unfavorably the the closeness of the Communist economic strategy and that of the Nationalists.
The BHLs OWN france !
The references in the article to the Gaulle are correct and Putin recognized the importance of this figure for Russian interests. There is a reason why “ally” de Gaulle did not show up in Yalta in 1945. The official story is that de Gaulle was the firm ally of Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin. In truth de Gaulle was at least as much at war with the English and Americans as he was with the Germans, read the instructive “Allies at War”, written by a Brit sympathetic to de Gaulle:
The title is ambiguous on purpose. Already during the war de Gaulle was dreaming of an anti-AngloZionist axis Paris-Berlin-Moscow, to be installed after the demise of communism, after the demise of RussoZionism that is. Putin is entirely in line with de Gaulle:
Interview beginning of June, 2014, president Vladimir Putin had with French media representatives on the eve of the D-Day commemorations in Normandy, France. At 16:39 Putin says:
Francois Mitterrand spoke of a European confederation with Russia as a member. I think this opportunity still exists. We will have it in the future.
Mind you, Putin said this AFTER the Euro-Maidan disaster.
Meanwhile, the European Right has enough of the American empire and its multiculturalism and all want better relations with Russia (Le Pen, even Fillon, Pegida, AfD, etc.), now that the world of Islam is rapidly radicalizing and becoming a real threat.
In the US everything is gearing up for the 1776-2.0, the coming clash between the majority white heartland and Trump backers versus the Soros libtards of both the West and East coast and will result in a split-up of the country, where the West coast will return to Mexico, the Yanks will get the Mississippi basin…
… and the Soros libtards the East coast (Greater Baltimore, Trans-Appalachia, New Israel or whatever fancy name you can come up with).
Paris-Berlin-Moscow has the potential to become the first address on this planet, again. Let’s go for it.
It’s not the French elite choosing this puppet, Sabbath Goyim, it’s the Zionist, racist, supremacist, Jewish elite, unless you mean that when you say French elite.
Ahh yes, the Rothschilds. As happened in France, Canada has had a similar ‘banking experience’ during the same time period. And now we have a #SelfieBoy version of Pompidou/Macron as well!
For those interested, see http://comer.org/archives/2014/COMER_MayJune2014.pdf
How PM Harper Plans to Sell Out Canada to the International Banking Cartel (page 13)
“… Mr. Hellyer explains that up until 1974 the various levels of government in Canada borrowed most of their money from the Bank of Canada at very low interest rates. As Mr. Hellyer explains, the ability to borrow money from the Bank of Canada pulled us out of the Great Depression, paid for WWII, and enabled the creation of important projects like the St. Lawrence Seaway and other parts of our national infrastructure.
But in 1974, that all changed when the government of Pierre Trudeau decided that the various levels of government in Canada would henceforth have to borrow most of their money from commercial banks, obviously at higher rates of Interest. It is no wonder that 1974 became the year our national debt really started to take off and has now arrived at its current level of over 600 billion dollars.
Since 1974 we have paid approximately 1.1 trillion dollars in interest on the debt, interest that never should have accumulated. And now we find ourselves in a government- imposed situation of austerity because of our tremendous debt. Think of the investments we could have made in Canada had we not had this burden of debt which we owe to the commercial banks. …”
Great article…now here were are in April 2018, after the USA, France and the UK bombed Syria, a secular government.