by Eric Zuesse for The Saker Blog
On October 1st, Russia’s Tass news agency reported that the Director of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service Sergei Naryshkin condemned the European Parliament for having blamed Stalin along with Hitler as having started World War II. He said, “The recent resolution adopted by the European Parliament that assigned the historic blame for the outbreak of the Second World War on the Soviet Union is nothing but a product of the cynical, immoral and even sleazy political put-up job.”
Naryshkin was referring to the September 19th vote in the European Parliament, by 535 votes in favor, 66 against and 52 abstentions, approving a document which stated that “The European Parliament … Stresses that the Second World War, the most devastating war in Europe’s history, was started as an immediate result of the notorious Nazi-Soviet Treaty on Non-Aggression of 23 August 1939, also known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, and its secret protocols, whereby two totalitarian regimes that shared the goal of world conquest divided Europe into two zones of influence.”
The historical reality of the matter is as follows, as I reported in fuller historical context on October 1st:
On 18 October 2008, Britain’s Telegraph bannered “Stalin ‘planned to send a million troops to stop Hitler if Britain and France agreed pact’” and buried the core revelation, that Stalin prior to the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact recognized Hitler’s determination to conquer the Soviet Union and he had, on 15 August 1939, urged Neville Chamberlin* to accept the U.S.S.R. as an ally in their mutual war to defeat Hitler; but Chamberlin refused, and so Stalin reached out to Hitler for an agreement with him to a dividing-line between those two countries’ (Germany’s and U.S.S.R.’s) essential areas of control for each one’s national security. Poland especially was a worry to both of them, because Poland had had territorial conflicts with both Germany and the Soviet Union. Thus was signed on 23 August 1939 the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, which split Poland between both countries.
The Versalles Treaty at the end of WW I had handed to Poland what had been German territory that through most of prior history had been Polish territory. Hitler was elected into power in 1933 vowing to abandon that Treaty and to restore, to German rule, that part of Poland.
As regards Poland’s conflicts with Russia: Poland had invaded Moscow during 1605-18, before Russia responded by both military and diplomatic means to virtually conquer Poland into becoming a colony of Russia, which it remained almost uninterruptedly until 1939, when the Hitler-Stalin agreement — the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact — restored part of Poland to the Soviet Union, but handed the other part of Poland to Germany.
Stalin, having been spurned by Chamberlin (who held his own imperialistic intentions — he was as imperialistic as were the fascists: Hitler, Hirohito, and Mussolini), had actually no other option in 1939 than to reach a peace-agreement with Hitler, so as to avoid having the Soviet Union become swallowed up by the capitalist countries — first by Germany, and then by whatever countries would finally win the coming World War (presumably, likewise Germany).
Consequently, the European Parliament voted on September 19th, by 535 to 66, for a lie, that the blame for the war in Europe was shared equally between both Stalin and Hitler, when, in fact, Stalin had tried to ally with Chamberlin in order to go to war together against Hitler, which would have — if Chamberlin had said yes — promptly been announced and could thereby have prevented, or at least postponed, Hitler’s invasion. If Chamberlin had said yes, then, of course, there wouldn’t have been any joint invasion of Poland by both Germany and the Soviet Union, but, to the contrary, there would have been, instead, a joint warning by both the British empire and the Soviet Union saying that if Hitler invaded any country, it would start a war by the allies — England and the Soviet Union — against Nazi Germany. The invasion of Poland might even have been prevented.
The European Union’s September 19th Resolution also condemned today’s Russia, in the following ways:
“Whereas although the crimes of the Nazi regime were evaluated and punished by means of the Nuremberg trials, there is still an urgent need to raise awareness, carry out moral assessments and conduct legal inquiries into the crimes of Stalinism and other dictatorships”
“Whereas despite the fact that on 24 December 1989 the Congress of People’s Deputies of the USSR condemned the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, in addition to other agreements made with Nazi Germany, the Russian authorities denied responsibility for this agreement and its consequences in August 2019 and are currently promoting the view that Poland, the Baltic States and the West are the true instigators of WWII”
“Calls on all Member States to commemorate 23 August as the European Day of Remembrance for the victims of totalitarian regimes at both EU and national level, and to raise the younger generation’s awareness of these issues by including the history and analysis of the consequences of totalitarian regimes in the curricula and textbooks of all schools in the EU”
“Points out that in the light of their accession to the EU and NATO, the countries of Eastern and Central European have not only returned to the European family of free democratic countries, but also demonstrated success, with the EU’s assistance”
“Expresses concern at the continued use of symbols of totalitarian regimes in the public sphere and for commercial purposes, and recalls that a number of European countries have banned the use of both Nazi and communist symbols”
“Maintains that Russia remains the greatest victim of communist totalitarianism and that its development into a democratic state will be impeded as long as the government, the political elite and political propaganda continue to whitewash communist crimes and glorify the Soviet totalitarian regime; calls, therefore, on Russian society to come to terms with its tragic past.”
The presumption there is that today’s Russia has not condemned Stalin and his crimes against the Soviet peoples, as well as the invasion of Poland, and that today’s Russia is totalitarian instead of a democracy (at least as much of a democracy as the EU itself is). It’s a call for — if not outright war against Russia — it’s a call for worsening relations between Russia and the rest of Europe. How contemptible.
As my article on October 1st documented: without the Soviet Union’s help, Hitler would probably have won WW II. Some thanks it is that today’s Russians (the nation that suffered the largest number of casualties and other losses from Hitler’s invasion of it) receive from the EU nations that they had saved from being controlled today by the Nazis. How contemptible can the EU possibly be, by 535 votes in favor, 66 against?
I ask this question as an American historian who enormously admires our President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s decisions throughout the war (except for the internments of Japanese-Americans). I think that he would despise what the EU has become. I certainly do. I share the contempt of today’s EU that was expressed by Mr. Naryshkin.
* In that October 1st Article, under deadline-pressure, I automatically said there “Churchill,” but, of course, he wasn’t yet Britain’s Prime Minister: Neville Chamberlin was. There were no other errors in the article, so far as I am aware.
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
The blame for World War II falls on those unprincipled leaders who crafted the Treaty of Versailles that devastated the German economy and impoverished the people. World War I demonstrated how alliances between nations are very dangerous when irrational thinking leads to military conflict. It is doubtful Hitler would have garnered national political attention if the “spoils of war” doctrine was not pursued to crush the German citizenry
Hitler was Chancellor for 12 years (1933 – 1945). Germany rose up from the economic ash in the first six years and returned to ash in the last six years. The Fuhrer could not see that economic power is greater than military power and Germany would have conquered all of Europe and been a greater juggernaut than the U.S. which was long in the throws of economic depression due to the implementation of poor fiscal polices enacted by the Federal Reserve Central Bank. Patience is a virtue that Hitler lacked, which led to the fall of Germany.
“Then said Jesus unto him, ‘Put up again the sword into his place; for all that take the sword shall perish with the sword’ ” (Mathew 26:52 KJV 1611)
I agree-if Germany had waited another five years its scientific-technological prowess would have guaranteed a victory, but that would have been a bad outcome, although I suspect that the Jews and Roma would have been expelled, rather than exterminated, in that case. And a post-Hitler Nazi Germany could hardly have been a worse global hegemon than the USA has proved since 1945.
Mulga Mumblebrain’s view here does not accord with the facts. As I documented in detail in my 2000 book WHY THE HOLOCAUST HAPPENED, Hitler in his private notes in 1919, when he entered politics, referred to “The bible — Monumental History of Mankind” as his guide, and he entered politics then in order to fulfill what he deemed to be the intention of Jesus’s “war against the Jews” such as in Matthew 23:33-8 and John 8:44; namely, to exterminate them, so that (Revelation 20:1-5) Aryans (pureblooded Christians, descendants of Adam & Eve) would be freed from the curse of “Original Sin” (Genesis 3) and from the control by gtghe descendants of the snake in Genesis 3, that great serpent Satan, and thereby freed for 1,000 years (Revelation 20:1-5), and so bring about Paradise and the Thousand-Year Reich, on Earth. His actual aim, from the outset, was to exterminate all of them, but, as was also documented there, he knew that he’d need to become Germany’s leader in order to be able to do it, and that he mustn’t let anyone but his most trustworthy and closest subordinates in on this secret intention, because otherwise he’d not become enabled to pull off the surprise. He used the Madagascar-scam so as to enable Schacht and other essential technocrats who didn’t share his intense hatred of Jews, to stay on his team for as long as possible, and thereby to spring the trap in as much secrecy as possible. I am the only historian who has studied all of Hitler’s known writings, personal and public, in order to track in him the development of his ultimate plan, the “final solution to the Jewish problem,” and so I can say with certainty that “the Madagascar plan” etc. were mere ruses by him, never seriously being considered by him. Furthermore, he had crucial cooperation from the clergy at crucial stages. For example: in 1933, he had every church report to the Government the lists of their parishioners, including for how many generations they had been members. He even told them that this was in order to enable the Government to identify true Aryans, not Jews. He actually planned it very skillfully, and he even told the Pope’s representative in 1933 that his policy regarding Jews was only a continuation of what had been the Church’s policy “for 1,500 years,” meaning since the first Church-sponsored pogroms. The Pope did not object, except regarding Jews who had converted to Catholicism. As for Protestants, Luther’s writings also were inspiring to the young Hitler, and the Lutheran clergy were generally very cooperative with the anti-Jewish policies. Higtler himself was brought up by a conservative Catholic mother and he first aspired to become a priest. His speeches paraphrased from and quoted over a hundred passages in the Bible — both New and Old Testaments. He rejected Rosenberg’s view that the Old Testament must be discarded. To Hitler, all of it was “The bible — Monumental History of Mankind.” Hitler knew what he was doing, and he came remarkably close to completing it. In fact, zionist Jews are, to a large extent, Jewish versions of the Christian Hitler, and their target of hatred is especially Palestinians — which likewise goes back to the Bible.
Eric, and ‘Christian’ Hitler modeled himself on some Zionazi commandments in the Old Testament to ‘kill even the babies’. That is not the Christian way to purge oneself of original sin. Hitler and his Nazis were not Christians but followers of the Anti-Christ: Nietzsche.
Hitler was not a believer. He clearly told Degrelle about it. and what you claim about Hitler’s obsession to trigger a jewish holocaust lacks any foundation. What he understood was the necessity to severe the links between Germany and the international finance system which was in the hands of the jewish community. It was a must to cut the debt spiral system. The way, he dealt with the zionists in Palestine is a proof that he has no fantasy about the necessity of killing the jews. He wanted the jewish’s hands out of Germany.
Mulga, I know it is quite different from the official fairy tale, and one can easily be fooled by these contemptible lies, but Nazi Germany (the SS) was just like Daesh (the IS IS) nowadays.
There’s in essence really no difference between these AngloZionist “boogieman” projects.
It’s very unlike the official fairy tale, but very simple. They wear (wore) a mask in order not to implicate (AngloZionist led) Western imperialism, but they are (were) in reality 100% its (CIA) mercenaries.
By the way, no wonder the treasonous USSR leadership (1989) condemned the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
The post-1953 Soviet Union had a treasonous Trotskyite leadership of CIA/NWO agents. Same goes for Nazi/EU/NATO Germany and the rest of the AngloZionist West.
Poke the truth,
Hitler’s Germany was never going to be an economic juggernaut without war. Hitler financed his economy with Mefobills I.e. a form of internal debt. Look it up. Sooner or later, when the Mefobills debt matured, his economy would have come crashing down like a house of cards. The only way to keep it going was to plunder new assets and gold from other countries to offset the Mefobills. Which is what he did: Blitzkrieg-ed his neighbours and stole their gold…
Also, Hitler wasn’t investing in housing or healthcare, but in his military industrial complex. Nazi Germany’s economy was a state-sponsored, debt-fuelled, war machine. Very similar to the US economy of today. It is expansionary by nature.
I do agree with you that the root cause of WWII was WWI (and the Versailles Treaty). WW I and WW II are basically one single conflict with an interim pause of several years.
Dear Serbian Girl,
You broached the topic of MEFO bills and I will share with you a brief history of the creation, purpose and successes of a very clever scheme to revitalize the German economy.
MEFO stood for Metallforschungsgesellschaft (Metal Research Company), a private empty-shell company with paid-up capital of 1 million marks. It was co-owned by Siemens, Gutehoffnungshutte, Rheisenstahl and Krupp, in whose names the bills were issued, so as not to weigh on the fiscal budget.
(Endnote  from Macroeconomics in Germany: The forgotten lesson of Hjalmar Schacht written by Biagio Bossone, Stefano Labini 01 July 2016)
MEFO bills were dual purpose promissory notes issued to German government contractors and suppliers by the company under the direction of the Third Reich as payment for goods and services. The receivers of the MEFO bills would exchange them for cash at a local bank. The local banks would deliver them to the Reichsbank (Germany’s central bank) and their accounts would be credited. Since MEFO bills were not money printed by the Reichsbank, the rate of monetary inflation was kept in check.
This scheme is not a new idea as some would think. During the days of the American Revolution, the Continental Congress printed paper money and each of the State governments issued their own bills of credit that were also used for payment. Rampant inflation ensued in the cost of goods sold. This is what happens when too much money is not retired by taxation or through the issuance of government debt.
The German variation of earlier monetary policy systems (e.g., Öffa bills) was tightly controlled and it worked because the German government enacted price and wage controls so that equilibrium was achieved between the circulation of money and the goods purchased through private production. Money lent by foreign banks had to be directed for internal production, not speculation in the capital markets.
The Nazi regulatory regime grew and nearly every facet of German society was scrutinized and reshaped to ultimately serve the State. The German people had employment and money to spend into the economy, which was a much improved life than under the Weimar Republic. But the German citizens were losing their independence and freedom of choice. In 1935, Germany announced it would rebuild its army, which necessitated an enormous increase in government spending.
History shows the Fuehrer lacked diplomatic skills, was impulsive, practiced racism and believed in the bludgeon of military power to obtain his goals. Hitler did not love the German citizenry; he manipulated them as a means to an end, which was ultimately paid in blood to Satan his benefactor, of over 60 million Gentile souls in Europe.
It is within the realm of possibility that Hitler could have reclaimed the eastern territories that were relinquished due to the Treaty of Versailles by exemplifying the rise in prosperity of the German people (restricted as it was) compared to Poland, Lithuania, Czechoslovakia et al who were still suffering the calamities of the Great Depression. But his intolerance blinded him from seeking other ways to achieve greatness.
I don’t believe this. What a load of nonsense. Hitler and Stalin to be jointly blamed for the Second World War. Indeed. The gentlemen in the European Parliament forgot the following points:
When it comes to Hitler, it’s debatable if Adolf Hitler of the Second World War is the same person as Adolf Hitler born in Austria. If you compare facial features from different photographs, you will see differences. Also, did Hitler in 1945 really commit suicide, or did he escape, using one of four escape tunnels his bunker had ?
As everybody knows, a war cannot be fought if a country does not possess financial resources. In the case of Germany we have the spectacle of one country fighting two world wars at it’s “own” expense. Really ?
Hitler comes to power in 1933 and theatrically closes three Rotschild’s banks in Germany, proving he was “not” under Rothschild’s control. Really ? Historians are very selective in their approach, always “forgetting” to mention the fact that in 1931 Wall Street opened the Bank of International Settlements in Basel, right next to the German border. It was this Bank which financed Hitler. On top of that we have investments which Wall Street made in Germany after World War One, when Ford and others started opening manufacturing plants. It was Ford which provided the German Army with all of it’s trucks for transport.
Then we have the question of raw materials. As we all know, industry cannot function without them. Germany only had coal, and nothing else. The chief raw material is iron ore. Who gave Germany iron ore ? The answer is Sweden, which conveniently remained “neutral” in both world wars. Then, of course, we have the question of aluminium for German planes, “innocently” given to Germany by the US.
Why was Germany massively bombed during World War Two ? The official explanation was to prevent it from manufacturing armaments. Absolute nonsense. If the Allies wanted to prevent German industry from functioning, all they had to do was apply pressure on Sweden to terminate iron ore exports, which was not done. Germany was therefore bombed, military and civilian targets included, the aim being to destroy the country and prevent a future Russian-German economic partnership, the nightmare of Anglo-Saxon bankers since the 19th century.
Why did the US enter the War in December of 1941, and not in September of 1939 ? The answer is simple. When Stalin started moving more than a million troops from Manchuria to Moscow, it became apparent that Hitler would be defeated before the gates of Moscow, as he was. Everybody knew what happened to Napoleon. In 1812 he enters Moscow and in 1814 Russians enter Paris. This, of course, had to be prevented.
Both Napoleon and Hitler were proxy fighters, fighting for the bankers, who financed them. The largest armies both created were used against Russia, the aim being to break up the country on behalf of the bankers. Both Napoleon and Hitler failed. After 1945 NATO took the role of breaking up Russia, so that bankers and corporations could plunder it. Too late for that. NATO, too, will fail. What the European Parliament did was a cheap propaganda move, the aim being to conceal the roles bankers had in both world wars and also to justify the existence of NATO, which belongs to the history books. Just to remind readers that both the EU Central Bank and the US Fed are controlled by the Rothschild’s and Rocekrfeller’s. We now have a clear picture why the European Parliament made that absurd resolution.
B.F. Thank you for a very informative post. I have a couple of questions for you.
Was it not the Rothschild’s that financed the Duke of Wellington’s campaign against Napoleon in Spain? If that is the case how can we understand them also financing Napoleon in his invasion of Russia? Do you have a picture of this?
Is it correct, in your opinion, that part of the general hostility to Napoleon was, in part, that he was intending to break the power of the Rothschild banking control of France, along with that of the Vatican?
The banksters often finance both sides, and Napoleon emancipated the Jews, after all. A boon for the Rothschilds et al, but probably not so popular among the Talmudists, who gradually lost their total control over their flock.
@Mulga: “The banksters often finance both sides,” … and made it a condition that the winning side (whichever that might be) would make sure that the losing side repaid their loan as well. No wonder wars are popular with bankers: two pay for the price of one war.
“I never saw a war my sons did not like”. — Big Mama Rothschild
Yes, the Rothschild’s financed Wellington, as they did Napoleon in Russia. They always finance both sides and win every time. In 1776 they financed Washington and his “revolutionaries” (ie. freemasons under their control). They also financed Crown troops. Washington wins, and so do the Rothschild’s. In 1776 the American colonies changed masters. Until 1776 they were under the control of the Crown. After that they fell under the control of the Rothschild’s. Who controls the US Fed ? What is the HQ of the freemasons doing in Washington DC ? The commander in chief of all freemasons is Prince Philip, the husband of Queen Elizabeth of England.
The story you are relating is known for people who investigate and are sticked to the truth. But the russophobia actually is in furor and the bankers try to send a message in that way.
Dead on description of the reality of ww2. Can you imagine that the vassal whores of the European parliament think they can take a vote on history. No one is fooled by these expensive suit wearing zionazis goyim useful idiots.
Rabbi tells the truth
1938 News Report Confirms International Jewish Banker Financial War Aims
Hitler shut down all Freemason Halls, Rothschild banks and imprisoning a Rothchild.
German-Jews Against International Atrocity Propaganda (1933)
My reading of the 1938 run up to WW2 agrees with Eric Zuess, though independently arrived at via book, “The Chamberlain-Hitler Collusion”. The disastrous combination of malice and stupidity shown by the Leaders of Great Britain, France and Poland in those years is equaled only by the combination of malice and stupidity shown by the present European Parliament. Heaven preserve us from WW3, because Western Leadership will not!
Does Brussels have a commission on textbook changes?
In any case, it will take them years just to decide whether to burn the old books or write new ones.
That is outrageous beyond belief.
But unfortunately only the external sign of a decadent puddle of a civilization…
Not surprised at all. These are the same people who botched the WW I commemoration in Paris, last year. On the main tribune, they put the Kosovo (a state that did not exist), instead of Serbia, the state that received the Austro-hungarian ultimatum..The French ambassador apologised profusely afterwards, but the damage had been done.
These people are ridiculous, tragic-comic clowns. History will not be kind to them.
When the smoke clears,if we aren’t destroyed by nuclear war. I hope that a victorious Russia will abolish the EU.Only keeping a trading alliance,which is how it started out.And full sovereignty brought back to the nations of Europe.Only the end of the two hindrances to peace in Europe,the EU and NATO,will see a Europe at peace.The EU has had their chance,and failed,its time for it to go.
What will it take for Russia to learn that organizations such as the “European Parliament” and the EU,European Court,etc, are just covers for Russophobia. It’s shocking that Russia somehow believes it helps Russia to belong to that Parliament and other groups. On the contrary,any Pan-European group like that are controlled by enemies of Russia. And no amount of associating with them will change that. This latest vote is only one insult Russia has suffered from them. Save your money Russia ,and kick them to the curb.Withdraw from these groups.
There are(short term) timers in place to end the abuse(s). After that its a blatant violation of the law.
Within enough time, they will all fall under the Russian umbrella of responsibility.
Whatever you do, don’t talk about Germany and Poland carving up Czechoslovakia in March 1939, a result of the Munich Agreement between Germany, Italy , France and the UK.
Let’s be frank. Hitler was created by the West-he was their answer to the spectre of communism, just as fascism, revanchism, Trumpism, the Pentecostal ‘prosperity doctrine’ anti-Christianity of Bolsonaro, Morrison and Pence et al, Brexitism, blah, blah, blah are the ruling class’s answer to the horrors of neo-liberal capitalist collapse, now so palpably accelerating. That the EU Parliamentary sewer would vote for such shite is despicable, but expected. It is, apart from anything else, spitting in the face of the 25 million or so Soviets who died defeating fascism, while the glorious West helped the fascist survivors to escape to sanctuary in the West. Next they’ll be declaring the OUN ‘victims’ of Soviet genocide and Bandera a hero of pan-Europeanism, or some such garbage. Those who the Gods wish to destroy they first make barking mad.
And the reason the war monster Churchill refused to even consider the peace overtures offered by Germany in 1940 was his fear that peace could allow Germany a chance to unite with Russia. So I read at least. The question remaining how realistic that fear was given the Soviet Revolution. Here a long standing English terror – a unity between Russia and Germany that would completely eclipse the Anglo West. So to forestall that possibility another 25 million dead. David Irving writes that at the end of his war he had huge blow up black and white photos on his wall of the devastation he wrought on Dresden. What a fucking hero that guy was! He was terribly uncomfortable personally, if he was not involved in war. Well at least he could speak and paint with charm! And so there it is – two world wars thanks to Churchill. He also set up, with the connivance of FDR, the forerunner of the American CIA in 1940 in New York.
Roosevelt has to also be seen as a capitalist warmonger. Those close to him were cognizant of the fact that in the late 1930’s FDR realized that the only way to forestall a lapse back into the depression was to generate massive industrial rearmament. So for that he needed a global war. He did it to save HIS economic administration. There is capitalism for you. Politics being the art of the possible has been such an alchemical cauldron for us all.
Perhaps Churchill’s greatest depravity of many was his role in worsening the Great Bengal Famine in the 40s, by refusing relief efforts, ordering Australian grain-ships to avoid India and sail on to England, to fill food reserves there, as ten million or so died. Churchill was sent a detailed report on the famine at least once, and scrawled, ‘Why is Gandhi still alive?’ on one page. Whether a call for his assassination, or a query why Gandhi, too, had not starved, I am not sure. Either way more proof that Churchill was a true son of the English ruling class.
I studied in England and spent 13 years there. Most English people treat their own cousins like strangers so what do you expect.
Resolution is disgusting, just like you would expect from the EU. What is more disappointing is RI which is becoming more pro nazi by the day with titles for example:
‘The Russian Church in Exile Strongly (and Rightly) Supported Hitler’s Invasion of Russia’
‘Low Birthrates? Nazi Germany Could Teach Modern Europe a Thing or Two’.
Patrick Armstrong withdrew his permission to reprint his articles because:
“The gratuitous addition of a Nazi anti-semitic illustration to my piece was too much. After I posted this (and many other denials elsewhere) they changed the picture to an anodyne shot of a Pravda front page. Too late.“
Is this an alt right thing? Or a way to provoke readers to comment in order to keep views up and donations coming? I doubt they rely only on readers donations. If they did they could never afford such a long periods of not posting anything. Charles Bausman never hid intent to find big private or state donors. It is all about money for RI anyway. Soon after crowd founding Charles Bausman was involved in some shady financial controversies and chased quite a few known persons away from RI.
Who needs EU parliament as an enemy with friends like this.
This is ridiculous and makes the EU parliament look completely insane. The Munich agreement. Stalin trying for an alliance with UK and France, than the world war started when UK declared war on Germany. The NWO oligarchs have gone bonkers and their whores in the EU parliament have just demonstrated that the EU and NATO are the undemocratic forces.
“by 535 votes in favor, 66 against and 52 abstentions”
With those numbers, it is obvious the ep is filled with horse manure filled mannequins? As bad as the pindo regime.
“As regards Poland’s conflicts with Russia: Poland had invaded Moscow during 1605-18, before Russia responded by both military and diplomatic means to virtually conquer Poland into becoming a colony of Russia, which it remained almost uninterruptedly until 1939, when the Hitler-Stalin agreement — the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact — restored part of Poland to the Soviet Union, but handed the other part of Poland to Germany.”
This is pure nonsense. Poland ceased being a part of Russia at the end of WW1. Was very anti Soviet and fascistic. actually little different from the lowlife running poland today for the western capitalist oligarchy. A bit of irony is poland in the late 1930s aided the spanish franco fascists alongside nazi germany and fascist italy and really was little different from these two.
Other than that I essentially agree with EZ that the ep is producing anti-Russian propaganda with this resolution. Personally, I think it is an example zionazi control of the ep.
I’ve been waiting for years for the Roman Catholic priestly kiddy-fiddling scandal in Poland, home of that Pontifical protector of priestly paedophiles, Wojtyla, to break out. It seemed to be getting exposed a little while ago, then it appears to have been shut down, firmly. I would bet a pretty penny that it will prove to be at least as bad as the situation in Ireland.
Those interested in further reading on the lead up to WW2, and who was responsible, I think this article might be of interest.
The History of World War II: The War Started in October 1938
“In conclusion, the main perpetrators, Germany, Poland and Hungary, had three accomplices, in this international crime: Italy, Great Britain and France.
The first three started WWII in October of 1938 with the conscious assistance by the other trio.”
Started in September 1931, in Manchuria, I would say. Or perhaps we could say that WW1 never finished, just as WW2 certainly never did.
Actually, MM, the Pacific and Atlantic conflicts should considered as essentially two separate wars. Very different reasons behind each, even though both were set up and fought to consolidate western capitalist oligarch power.
vot, same conclusion as I gained from book, “The Chamberlain-Hitler Collusion”, but your source is more incisive.
Amazing how the past is as fluid as the future in the judgement of historians and the received wisdom of their readers. Reminds me of that passage from Orwell about the respective control of the present, past and future, each contingent upon the other. For every “memory hole” opened there will perforce be a memory synthesizer invoked, a balance almost Newtonian in its nature… or Taoist. You can never change just one thing.
Can anyone suggest a good user fiendly site for finding out MEPs votin records?
Johny C> If you pose this question over at Craig Murray’s blog, I’m certain you’ll get some useful responses. Many of the posters there are pretty well-informed about the EP and voting records.
I tried them before but didn’t get anything except to try certain sites that weren’t any use.
When will the Russian leadership finally and completely accept that they have no ‘partners’ in the west? A pawn such as Macron can stand in front of other world leaders and give his welcoming speech that it is time to welcome having normal relations with Russia and in the next breath to stab Russia in the back. Lies and deception are their specialties. The west is responsible for the communist and NAZI blight and the first world war which led to the second was planned by the British secret roundtable group of Cecil Rhodes and Lord Alfred Milner. This group is still active today with chapters in leading western countries.
Western countries constantly point the finger of blame and accusation at others whom they have targeted for crimes of which they themselves are guilty. It is truly sickening.
I think Russia can have a fairly decent existence in close partnerships with the other half of the world, if only the evil which grips the west would let them. But they won’t.
Come on. We all know the (Removed language,MOD) Polish are the ones to blame. Had not they been so consumed by their pathological Russophobia there would have been no German invasion.
gatobart, you mean if the Poles had joined the anti-Nazi front offered by Stalin in 1938? Instead of accepting Anglo / French advice to join Nazi Germany and Fascist Hungary in carving up CzesckoSlovakia 1938.
I am not going into the fine detail because I am not an expert on the matter, nor that I want to know more about the Poles or their History but I made some reading years ago about this subject, from official Polish sources, especially some hefty volume titled, of course, History of Poland. That was enough to show me that the sad tale that has been Poland’s History for several centuries originates in their deep hatred of everything Russian and on the fact that they were the second European power some 300 or 400 years ago and that they never accepted the loss of that privileged status. Even more when at the end the Russians they despised so much became a world power while they remain a small nation lost in Eastern Europe. As the result o that, centuries of Polish foreign policy has been focused on trying to be accepted as an equal and a partner by Western Powers, while never losing a chance to antagonize Moscow….or Berlin. There was even an instance when The Russians suggested Warsaw to meet and settle once and for all all their border and territorial disputes, while offering some tempting bones as a prize, and what did the Poles do…? They informed Western powers of the talks and asked them what should they answer and if these last said don”t they would do exactly that. So they were ready to relinquish their status as a sovereign nation and to enrage Moscow if that pleased the powers the want to be accepted by. All in all, this Polish behavior of trying to please their Anglo Saxon and Gallic pals, antagonizing at the same time the two world powers they couldn’t afford to enrage is what has brought so much pain and misery to them and to the world.
Eric Zuesse have it wrong. He should read “The Chief Culprit” by viktor suvorov in which there is a clear demonstration of Stalin’s responsibility in the WW II. By reading also “Controversy of Zion” by Douglas Reed, he will find out that F.D.R. is also sharing the responsibility of that war, thta the Zionists wanted the war..
That the European parliament starts to recognize that Hitler is not the sole responsible for that war is, I hope, just the begining of a awakening movement towards the Truth.
All Labour Party members of the European Parliament voted for this resolution according to my MEP. I had to email them because it is very difficult to find out the voting records of individual MEPs.