Igor Konashenkov, Russia’s Ministry of Defense spokesman, had a briefing for journalists on situation in Syria and said that MOD has proof of UK’s involvement in Douma chemical incident
Russia’s Defense Ministry has found those who took part in filming the rent-a-mob chemical attack in Syria’s Douma.
Russia’s defense ministry has evidence proving the United Kingdom’s direct involvement in the organization of the provocation with the alleged chemical attack in Eastern Ghouta, Igor Konashenkov, the ministry’s spokesman, said on Friday. He said the ministry had found those who took part in filming the rent-a-mob chemical attack in Syria’s Douma and these people told how the video had been shot.
Video starts at 22:42
Syria ‘chemical attack’ staged to provoke US airstrike, London pushed perpetrators – Russian MoD
US behavior over alleged Douma attack is ‘unworthy’ of permanent UNSC status – Russian envoy
Russian top brass reports it has proof of UK’s involvement in Douma chemical incident
Bulletin of the Russian Defence Ministry on implementation of the Memorandum on creation of de-escalation zones in the Syrian Arab Republic (April 13, 2018)
Russia’s Defense Ministry has found those who took part in filming the rent-a-mob chemical attack in Syria’s Douma
Moscow has the irrefutable data that this chemical attack was staged, Sergey Lavrov said
Briefing of the official representative of Russia’s Ministry of Defense Major General Igor Konashenkov on the Situation in Syria. Transcript in Russian.
Minutes ago I learned this good news,
so dear folks please remember all the
fake/paid commenter nicknames that urged for
Russia to nuke the US assets preemptively, basically inciting
a situation that could lead to WW3 and 100s of millions
of deaths. Those were all UK agents agitproping for Russia and
USA to destroy each other while UK can rise oto the top (again).
Well, not gonna happen british scum!
Furthermore, I would urge the UN/International community to
install a special International Court/Tribunal to bring to justice
Theresa May, Boris Johnson and all other involved in this matter
(Douma & Skirptal hoaxes).
Furthermore, I would urge the UN/International community to
take away the British seat at the UNSC. Maybe there was a time the UK
deserved to sit at the UNSC table, but that time is long gone.
Britain’s political and economic clout is miniscule thus undeserving to sit
next to the heavy weight countries. And with all the recent utterly despicable mischiefs
Britain shouldn’t be allowed to decide on humanity fate (as a whole) any longer.
Furthermore, I would urge the UN/International community to
remove the British pound as a reserve currency. They abused that privilege to spread
hate, misery, destruction and lies around the globe. No more!
don’t be damn silly.
seems to me people on all sides of this debate (with the exception of the Saker, who is a soldier and several other sensible people) have thrown around the word “nuke” and “WW3” so casually for so long they’ve forgotten what they mean.
Reality check: WW3 wont be a few cities take out in the US and Russia. It will be global devastation. if there is a nuclear war between Russia and the US the entire world dies. Radiation levels too high to sustain life, nuclear winter, no food, chaos, mass death.
No one is planning a nuclear war and no one will benefit from one. If it happens it will happen by accident because the west is governed by hubristic fools.
That’s your idea of an accident? Like the US gov is like innocent children who didn’t know the dynamite they are playing carelessly with could explode? Extreme hubris is a serious and often fatal disease, for those infected, and often more so for the many they harm. If nuclear war happens, I would not call it an accident, but rather a lawful and predictable result.
Happen by accident ?
No it may …… happen …… by key people in key push button positions ….. having seconds to make a crucial decision s based on ….. dubious reports data or opinion …. or what ever.
The existence of nukes and being on “alert” ready to fly … 15,000 of them in its self is the danger.
Its just too risky …..
They all need to be removed out of ….. reach …… then we all may have a chance to survive post conventional missile exchange…..
While nukes are there and ready to fly ?
Then some one some where may …… in the heat of a battle …..
Decommission all nukes thus removing the threat…. of global destruction and 100 s of years of a nuclear winter where peoples can no long survive…
yes there is little will amongst the rogue nuclear states
but we must try
Don’t you be damn silly.
Ooops I ” fell” on the Nuclear button.
Marcus, you are correct about nuclear war, even a ‘little’ one, say one hundred war-heads, between India and Pakistan, would end it all, due to the ‘nuclear winter’. However, I believe you do not quite comprehend the diabolical Evil of the psychopaths who rule the West. The USA has been relentlessly pursuing the ability to ‘prevail’ in a nuclear ‘exchange’ since 1949, and the USSR’s bomb. Even in recent years one could read US elite journals where it was boasted that the USA had reached a point of strategic dominance where they could destroy Russia and, or, China, with a sneak first-strike and ‘missile defence’ mopping up any surviving nukes. I think we underestimate the Evil and desperation of the Exceptionals, their Zionazi masters and the various psychopathic stooges like Micron and May, at our peril. The coming global ecological collapse only worsens their insanity. I’m sure some of them see a world war as the salvation of the elites, while the rest of us ‘useless eaters’ are obliterated.
What are they going to do then? Sit around and play chess? No doubt, as “resources” dwindle they’ll begin scheming to do one another in. Way to go.
Israeli journalist Arieh Shavit, “We believe with absolute certitude that right now, with the White House in our hands, the Senate in our hands and The New York Times in our hands, the lives of others do not count the same way as our own.”
The majority of people, at least on this side, understood long time ago how things can be provoked (manipulated) by a seemingly “patriotic” comment. Whenever I see “Russia should respond with force” type of comments I can smell the enemy. All these “covert salesmen” strategies are well outlined in many documents from the The CIA, NSA, Tavistock Institute, and the rest of those Global “Intelligence-Police Gestapo” think tanks. Many Russians know these documents by heart.
You’re onto it RATM, as are so many others in the alt-media after this latest skirkmish in the UK-Zionist war for control of the battlespace of mind.
History repeats itself with remarkable synchronicity. Tsar Putin sent his virtual pro Russian alt-media fleet to Donald Trump’s rescue, to assist with US withdrawal from Syria, whilst UK Zionist media did everything in it’s power to block the move, from Skirpal to E. Ghouta.
U.S. Civil War: The US-Russian Alliance that Saved the Union
How A Russian Czar Saved America
We have just experienced a fully staged Cuban Missile Crisis type event, to cover for the US withdrawal from Syria, and it seems to have bought Donald Trump some time, at least until UK controlled Zionist media regains it’s senses and comes back for more.
Of course it’s more like 1862-3 than 1865, and whereas the Union was easily going to win the first Civil War this time the balance of forces is almost reversed, expecially in terms of the psychological battlespace, and excluding the US military which remains firmly committed to the Union and Donald Trump, nothwithstanding the multitude of chicken shit weasels like David Petraeus.
Next up, the Congressional Battle of Gettysburg in November
I agree. This sad, pathetic and also somehow ridiculous show brought some issues to the light. I suspect that the main reason for the strike was those captured British “advisers” in East-Ghouta. This time Russians and Syrians were reluctant to release them. I suspect that Brits staged the gas-attack because of that. They speak loudly about bringing justice. Well, I think that now is time to bring justice to them. They are war criminals.
I sense a very strong connection with the whole Skripal affair there, too. It seems to me that the Skripal affair was laying the groundwork to whip up anti-Russia and anti-Putin hysteria in preparation of the planned war which now seems might not happen, thank goodness.
The war is happening right now, at a very high intensity. When the missiles start flying, it will heat up dangerously, and unpredictably.
Nah, won’t happen after this revelation. I wonder why took them so long to point who is behind all this chemical weapons charade, and I bet here is more to come if they continue poking the bear. Perhaps, they will learn about 911? Imagine.
Just as I suspected. Every time I hear someone screaming Israel, I start thinking London.
Russia should consider targeting America’s weak links, like the UK, instead of trying to go up against the beast directly. You’re up against a 666 pound monster, break its ankle.
I trust Putin and Russia to respond as intelligently and effectively as possible under the insane and unwarranted circumstances provoked entirely by the US Empire.
The Empire now openly proclaims itself to be unaccountable to any laws whatever. Might makes right is it’s only “law”.
Might or power is a psychic force, and therefore unstable. Whoever gives themselves over to it’s seductive whisper will sooner or later fall on their own sword. The evident hysteria of all of its minions is an indicator that that process is in acceleration. The Russian approach is the correct one, essentially waiting out the inevitable collapse of Empire, but with “guns at the ready”. Putin is the most exceptional statesmen the modern world has seen. One could say he was “annointed” for his positon, as there is always a counterbalance to everything in this dual, or warring universe.
A poll carried out in the Herald newspaper here in Scotland says that 95% are against war on Syria, yet May takes Greater England to war with no parliamentary vote. We in Scotland have no democratic voice in this Greater England. May,Johnson etc are war criminals as are their media puppets.
Well,you are the only country in History that voted to Stay part of the “so-called” United Kingdom..
Pretty dumb move!!!
How to attack an aircraft carrier and render its primary function inoperable.
An aircraft carrier is a floating airstrip that launches fighter-bomber airplanes. The ship’s technology has the ability to launch its entire air wing (70+ birds) in an elapsed time of 30 minutes. When they finish dropping bombs they return to the “bird farm”. Jet planes are unable take off from the short flight deck without the assistance of steam enabled catapults. Modern carriers have four catapults that launch aircraft; two are located forward near the starboard side and center line of the ship and the other two are approximately amidships (middle of the vessel) closer to the port side, aligned with the part of the deck that is offset from the main flight deck. The offset deck is longer in length and used by the returning planes to land. This flight deck design allows planes to simultaneously take off and land.
Here is picture number 1 taken facing the bow of the USS Eisenhower, CVN 69 (see: https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/531f4b1beab8ea2b5328e9c9-750-910.jpg ).
The length of the runway needed for a jet plane to take off is around 300 feet compared to the entire length of the deck which is around 1,100 feet from stern to the bow. The picture clearly shows 3 of the 4 catapults in operation (the catapult strips can be distinguished by their worn grey color on the flight deck). The 4th one is hidden underneath the row of planes lined up on the starboard side of the ship. The location of the catapults are an integral design of the flight deck and cannot be moved.
The primary function of the carrier is to launch aircraft. In order to do that, it must have sufficient runway to enable a jet to take off with the assistance of the steam catapult and the speed of the carrier moving through the water to create enough lift over the wings of the plane to take off. Now, what is the most critical part of the carrier necessary to do its job: the catapults, attack aircraft or the flight deck itself?
The answer is the flight deck and specifically, that part of the deck towards the last 100 feet forward of the catapults. Destroy that part of the deck alone means there isn’t enough deck to launch planes. It doesn’t matter if the aircraft are able to land approaching from the stern of the ship; what is important is they can’t take off and without that last 100 feet of runway, they are virtually useless to project force.
However aircraft carriers don’t sail unprotected; they are surrounded by surface warships and submarine boats operating together in a convoy or in modern terms, a “Strike Group”. See picture number 2:
In the second picture, we see these ships sail in a defensive pattern, like links in a chain. Disable one of the links (warships) and that opens up an attack lane to pinpoint a hit to the carrier with a barrage of anti-ship missiles targeting the critical area of the flight deck mentioned above.
The goal of attacking an aircraft carrier is not to sink it but to neutralize its most critical function, that of launching its “birds”. In my layperson opinion, this is one approach to accomplish that task.
This is good news but irrelevant. Striking Syria, leaving it destabilised and in fragmented chaos is the goal on the way to doing the same to Iran, Russia and China. If not today then tomorrow.
Facts proving innnocence will just be ‘discredited’ and ignored or denied -in the words of Turd Blossom: “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”
Bullies are invariably awful cowards so there are ways of dealing with them but it has to be ‘judiciously’ since a Hegemon in declne can be a very dangerous patient.
first, it was karl rove who said those words not bush jr.
second, the ROW is also ‘acting’ and changing reality. see petro-yuan.
and in a few years, be you empire or not, noone will be holding
petro-dollars to do business or pay for oil or for banking reserves.
well, maybe not noone, maybe Guam and Togo will still use the petro-buck.
Turd Blossom was the name Bush jr gave to Karl Rove.
This comment is off-topic – please post further comments to the MFC. Mod
everyone should just boycott the upcoming royal wedding. Those people
are nothing special and didn’t earn that level of attention.
Do you hear me, you reptilian Elizabeth Alexandra Mary,
you and your parasitic kin are nothing special…
URGENT: Syria Under Attack
HOMS, Syria – Following a chemical weapon attack earlier today in the East Ghouta town of Duma that was blamed on the Syrian government, missiles have been launched at a Syrian airbase.
Read more at:
I have tried for an hour to watch the videos but they are blocked . a black screen appears with an announcement that an error occurred and to try again later . So much for that cherished freedom they talk so much about. I live in New Mexico