by Denis A. Conroy for The Saker Blog
The British Press is big on righteous indignation. Its wallows in selective grief whenever Russia is accused of dirty dancing. It uses single issues reportage selectively, to obfuscate its modus operandi. The subject of the unpleasant Salisbury Skripal poisoning attack on two people was written up as though it was the evil to end all evils…far outweighing the attention poor suffering Yemen might deserve, for instance.
It comes as no surprise that the Anglo Zionist media, ablaze with recriminations of the most self-righteous sort, spit out venom with unabashed hypocrisy whenever the Russian Bear is accused of a crime. The entire Skripal episode rests only on assertions. Britain, as a node in the Washington Consensus playbook, likes to issue statements that seem to come directly from the mouth of a prim elocution-teacher articulating words to justify the prioritization of perspectives that afford the Anglo-Zionist sphere a green card. But strangely, their selective grief becomes ever more retrograde.
And it might be that they are unaware that they have been downgraded to the rank of cheerleaders, whose function it is to run into the arena waving plumes. In the ‘great game’ presently underway on the global pitch, where the dollar and the yuan are the symbols that adorn the goal post of either contestant, at either end of the playing field there are basically two combatants.
The neo-conservative class, cosseted in Anglo-Zionist priorities were quick to publish the following statement in the Independent Newspaper; US, France, Canada and Germany… pledge to join Theresa May’s Campaign Against Russian GRU Spy Agency…alleging that the whole operation was approved by Vladmir Putin’s government.
But something didn’t gel, this was a rerun to something we had seen before. It all came across as a reboot of the ‘Coalition of the Willing’ …the same alliance who marched onto the world stage as liberators wishing to save Iraq from itself, but ended up destroying it, were back. Somebody had dusted off the old George Bush, Tony Blair, Condoleezza Rice and Henry Kissinger lies. The Brits, readying for another sortie, rushed out onto the ‘all the world is a stage’ hoping to kick another goal for Empire.
Stranger than strange is the fact that the liberal classes in the West fail to perceive contiguities that connect them to the horrendous slaughter of thousands of Yemen’s children, or to their acceptance of Israel’s inhuman occupation of Palestine, which alternates between subjecting the occupied people to siege warfare, or to a regatta like event, where the power of the smug occupying force is celebrated in ways the beggar belief. Shooting fish in a barrel comes to mind. Does this happen because “power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely”?
If the ‘good folk’ of Western enlightenment are undisturbed by the events that recently occurred in Gaza, then they are obviously at one with the majority of Israelis who relish turkey-shoots that slaughter hundreds of caged and unarmed civilians for the sport of it, simply because Israelis are in possession of an ideology that induces identity euphoria in them. Is it because they believe that God or Doctor Strangelove made them the chosen people?
Even more strange is the fact that humans continue to justify lies and subterfuge if their interests are challenged. The US, for example…the Godfather supporting Israel’s gauche actions…remains utterly committed to blocking change everywhere, so that it can keep the world dependent on the American dollar…and the American consumer as well…even at the cost of high trade deficits at home while engaging in trade wars if need be. Collusion between America and Israel is overseen by AIPAC…the new Founding Fathers of The Republic…who live in Washington and Tel Aviv, and whose purpose is to keep the banking system safe from miscegenation. Hence the drip feed prioritisation of single-issue texts and sub-texts that explain Western media and its disappearing values.
The methods used by the unipolar Anglo-Zionist Empire are brutally simple; use military muscle and propaganda to tabulate the rules of the agenda. The most expedient way to do so is to control the flow of information. The space between imputation and tabulation is where colonization is born.
America has become a culture that needs to spend an unbelievable amount of money on security to retain power, both domestically and abroad, so that it can continue to impede systems that might interfere in its quest for global economic hegemony. Its foremost need is to create a system of privately-run forces like Wall Street, The Pentagon, the Intelligence Agencies, the Media, Academia and every other institution that walls-in the ‘the people’s’ voice, so that Corporatism can remain the arbiter in matters of unity.
It is currently referred to as the Deep State. It could also be referred to as the place where fifth-columnists go to pull the leavers that release the crap that spews out from the entails of the chewing-gum single-issue personification of entitlement culture that has overtaken America. It freely proffers single-issues of many stripes to keep existential angst on the boil, while sequestering the sole right to interpret the meaning of unity.
Ever since Corporate American Democracy Inc. emerged as the marketable brand par excellence…by its own reckoning…it has unrelentingly sought to subsume every other form of rule to a nether zone of irrelevance. As its ideological logic continues to spread across the globe, it does so by creating organelles of the Doctor Strangelove kind to kill off competitors vying for a percentage of the global marketplace. The better known ones are, Economic Sanctions, False Flag Operations, Extrajudicial Killings, Government Destabilisation, Siege Warfare, crucifixion of non-white people and many other forms of flesh-shredding instrumentalities that have found their way into the Western toolbox.
But with the passing of time, we have come to understand how adept Corporate American Democracy Inc. has become in creating false-flag single issues of the anodyne kind in its quest to undermine the sovereignty of its neighbours. Examples that springs to mind are Russia Nationalism, State Capitalism and Confucianism in Communist China, plus the Religious component in the Iranian system of governance. In general, Anglo-American-Zionism has little tolerance for cultures in possession of unifying doctrines capable of underpinning the genesis of their unipolar cultures…which is why Corporate Capitalism frequently bombs the shit out of them.
Which brings us back to fifth columnists like George Soros, the archetypal Zionist anti-assimilationist, and what Alex Christoforou had to say about him;
“Leaked Memo Show how George Soros planned to overthrow Vladimir Putin and destabilise Russia”.
“The recent DC Leaks of over 2,500 documents from George Soros NGOs, has shed a bright light on how the billionaire used his vast wealth to create global chaos in a never-ending push to deliver his neo-liberal euphoria to the peasant classes.
While Soros has managed to thoroughly destabilise The European Union by promoting mass immigration and open borders, divided the United States by funding Black Lives Matter and corrupting the very corruptible US political class, and destroyed Ukraine by pushing for an illegal coup of a democratically elected government using neo-Nazi strong men…one country that Soros has not been able to crack has been The Russian Federation”.
One man’s meat is another man’ poison it would seem. Observing the parvenus of fake literacy pushing the Washington-Zionist Consensus across the globe is to witness an Empire in decline. It has acquired all the hallmarks of a society at war with itself. The view from the looking-glass suggests that the vitriolic blowback from within the greed-worn US of A may require the removal of the appellation ‘U’ from the ‘S of A’. At which point, a cross-gender ‘witchcraft craze’ may devour America’s fairest and foulest with a repeat of the Salem Witch Trials (Europe 1300 to 1600), leading to thousands of supposed witches…mostly women…being executed. If blowback is in the offing, expect the casualties to be in the millions this time?
It appears that American media in conjunction with government sanctioned controls relating to ‘kosher’ versus fake news, have successfully manufactured a caulking product that cocoons the native imagination…or lack of…in a narrative that is restrained by the octopus embrace of the billionaire class. The front line being the power to project single issues as the modus operandi of democracy, a multifarious system that leaves the question of helmsman-ship open to ever more privatization.
The joie de vivre that may have existed in the US of A of yore, is no more. It has been replaced by acrimonious duopoly-narcosis infighting concerning which side of the duopoly can run the surveillance state that Corporate America has become. As execrable inequality continues to eat into the American dream, more and more Americans have come to realize that the system is stacked against them. They suspect that there is some awful presence in their midst, but don’t quite know what it is. They suspect that some unnameable force has corrupted the social aspect of the State but remain mystified as to how a socialised state might ward off the predations of Corporate Capitalism.
The idea that the State could be the vector that unified all single-issues is incompatible in a culture that venerated private property and celebratory status as an end to itself. When China’s successes in harnessing capitalism’s potential in ways that worked for the unity of the entire system began to show positive results, alarm bells began ringing in the US of A. It was at this point that the capitalist media swung into action, employing the best bullshit its epistemological dirty dancers could muster to accuse China of bad faith, evil intent, colonial skulduggery, and just about every single issue it could come up with to detract from the obviously very successful New Silk Roads enterprise.
The reason that the New Silk Roads ventures were embraced by so many African nations were that the terms of trade and borrowing were generally more attractive that anything Western banks could match. Besides, Chinese diplomacy and comity were palliatives accompanying the magic of the silky yuan making its way into a greatly underdeveloped dark continent. Silk, gold and the yuan had arrived in time to add a little hope for Africans endeavouring to develop their resourceful habitats.
According to China’s Chamber of International commerce, over 3,000 Chinese companies have invested Africa-wide in telecommunications, transportation, power generation, industrial parks, water supply, rental business for construction machinery, retail, schools, hotels and hospitals.
At the Forum on China-African Cooperation (FOCAC) in Beijing, President Xi Jinping announced a significant US $60 billion package to compliment another US $60 billion pledged at the 2015 summit.
That breaks down to $15 billion in grants and interest-free loans; $20 billion in credit lines; a $10 billion fund for development financing; $5 billion to finance imports from Africa; and waiving the debt of the poorest African nations diplomatically linked to China.
We in the Anglo-Zionist marketplace have lost sight of what comity might mean in the context of trade. As colonists and war-mongers we have come to accept violence and deception as the norm. We have also come to accept one set of rules for those on the outside of society, and another set of rules for those on the inside…or for those yet deeper within…the Deep State mandarins who manipulate us.
On any given day, there is $41.1 trillion in a self-invested network of interlocking capital that spans the globe and is managed by the mandarins of global capitalism operating outside our purview, to provide the ideological justifications for their shared interests (promulgated through their corporate media), that entails formulating agendas that have little, if any, concerns about human values or matters pertaining to the health of the planet. They are there as policy elites who seek the continued growth of capital in the world and to serve a unifying function…but for whom?
The World Bank, International Monetary Fund, G20, G7, World Trade Organization (WTO), World Economic Forum (WEF), Trilateral commission, Bilderberg Group, Bank of International Settlements, Group of 30 (G30), the Council on Foreign Relations and the International Monetary Conference serve as institutional mechanisms for consensus building within the transnational class, who in turn, exist as states within states, where they enjoy the collective status of fifth columnists, quietly and covertly accumulating assets per means of neo-conservative privatisation.
For evidence of this, we need only look back and observe how deep-state interests skewed interpretations of historic fact to justify their own existential playbook. The phrase “axis of evil” was first used by US President George W. Bush in his State of the Union address on January 29, 2002 and often repeated through his presidency, to describe foreign governments that, during his administration, sponsored terrorism and sought weapons of mass destruction. The phrase attributed to former speechwriter David Frum, originally as the axis of hatred and then evil. Frum explained the rational for creating the phrase “axis of evil” in his book, “The Right Man. The Surprise Presidency of George W. Bush”.
With hindsight, we see how the consolidation of America’s Deep State came into being. The war on the Muslim World was let rip because it had the blessing of AIPAC, The New York Times and a host of fellow travellers who successfully maneuvered their mandarins into positions of power, deep inside the heart of the Republic. In effect, Zionism created a new ‘Vatican’ in the US of A, becoming an eminence grise by slithering its way into the heart of the Republic. In so doing, it adopted the mantle and status of alter ego for the punch-drunk Republic and employed institutions like the New York Times to tabulate a language of deception.
Dipping even deeper into the archives of ‘hindsight’, we are now able to tabulate…thus interpret…the many actions of ‘The Coalition of The Willing’ as being nothing more that an unconscionable jamboree of disinformation designed to intimate the Muslim World, and ultimately, Russia, China, Iran, North Korea…countries that were seen as obstacles that stood in the way of the Anglo-American-Zionist “Project for the New American Century”…compliments of William Kristol and Robert Kagan.
PNAC’s stated goal was “to promote American Global Leadership”. This organization stated that “American leadership is good for both America and for the world” and sought to build support for “a Reaganite” policy of military strength and moral clarity. What we observe in hindsight is totally unacceptable…the re-immergence of a Crusader mentality?
What The Washington Consensus achieved under the leadership of its alter ego (Zionism) was something entirely different; the destruction of Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Palestine and other states occurred with absolute impunity. Worst of all, if current holocausts are brought out into the light of day as is the fashion of single-issues politics, they are quickly removed from centre stage scrutiny by the invisible hand that owns the franchise on victimology…and the price for saying that other holocausts are no less inferior to those under franchise, is to be branded an anti-…!!
“All the world’s a stage”, declared the Bard of Avon. But think again; the acrimonious garbage that spews from the mouths of Western governments and their media show us that something quite uniquely different is happening on the world stage that no bard could explain. The evidence is now before us, language and truth are in freefall, and we may just have to wait until some unknown force comes to our rescue, to purge the toxic swamp that obscures our vision of that “All the World’s a Stage” perspective, the one that contains the seeds that are needed to grow a unified unity.
Denis A. Conroy
How about this MrConroy: Africa is for africans.
What say you?
Cos if you think, that the chinese adventure into Africa will end up somehow differently, than the european did…you might be onto sumthn’.
Chinese are more pragmatic and do not concern themselves with the white man’s burden.
Otherwise, good read!
Oh they will.
Even western colonizers weren’t concerned with the white men burden in the beginning it began to take form in the golden age of genocide and abuse as in late 1700 and early 1800
Incidentally the age of human zoos and the last great extermination of indigenous people of America and Australia
Extermination? When there’s more now than there was then?
There were tens of millions of Native Americans in the continent in 1620. Not so now.
I think the so called white man’s burden works only for Anglo-Saxons (and maybe Spaniards although I don’t think they care) due to their dirty history of slavery, genocide etc
I have never met any Eastern European suffering from it. And we are all white.
I think it will be different, Chinese have no desire to colonize or conquer Africa the way Europeans did.They are interested in trade(in the simple understanding of the word, exchange of goods and services as mutually agreed by the two parties involved), in line with the historical traditions of Chinese foreign policy, of trade and exploration.
This article just states the obvious. The question is, when will European leaders act for European interests? Everyone can see whats going on- Europe is ruled by Washington and London and Zürich banking/military interests. Europe needs to realise Russia is its natural ally and an alliance with Moscow is the only way they can guarantee energy and security. There is no benefit to continuing to accept colony status.
Unfortunately the EU has capitulated to Anglo Zionist demands. EU gave in to Trumps’ economic tariff war. Next time he has a tantrum, no doubt Junker will kiss him and give him twice as much as he demands. When the fake chemical attack was used as an excuse for USA tomahawk terrorism, the EU cheered them on. Most EU leaders believe the truly ridiculous Skripal tale, and gladly sanctioned Russia, when the whole thing is so unreal is not even worth an article in a teenagers magazine. Today Barnier announces EU will give UK (which now meets all requirements of a fascist state) a brexit deal in eight weeks, despite its occupation of Gibraltar, Cyprus and North Ireland (all EU territory), and despite all the insults against European people the UK does. European citizens are treated as Untermench in UK, I experianced it myself, being spat at and insulted. Cannot these politicians see what ordinary people can see- we despise Anglo Saxon and Israeli imperialists. Sanction Israel, USA and UK, close all NATO bases… sign a deal with Russia!
Poor poor European citizen
There is no such thing as a European leader
The position is called servant to the overlord Zion
I am reading a great book someone recommended on this blog – regarding Judaism (the author was a Jew from Warsaw Ghetto -and a survivor of Bergen-Belsen) it’s as disturbing and disgusting as it is hilarious:
from “Guide to the Perplexed” (considered the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy):
” The nature of the Blacks and the nomads of the South…is like the nature of ANIMALS, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey…”
“A Jewish woman returning from her monthly ritual bath of purification (after which sexual intercourse with her husband is mandatory) must beware of meeting one of the four SATANIC creatures: Gentile, pig, dog or donkey. If she does meet any one of them, she must take another bath.” From a book on Jewish moral code which was one of the most popular books among Jews in both eastern Europe and Islamic countries and is still widely read in Orthodox circles
Brilliant piece Dennis. I particularly like the way you use intellect, the primary weapon of the oligarchy to expose the deeper underlying issue that is driving this all consuming stage play. Ego, the great achievement of the West is all about separating itself from reality and seeking to dominate it. We all do it, and choose not to see it. I read you as positing the real opposition to the madness of ego as being found in the evolution of the comity of unity. Real global unity is a terrifying threat to the empire of ego. This global stage play as you so well intimate is so necessary because humanity must experience evolution beyond the hegemony of egoism. This requires some form of enculturation of the transcendence of collective egoism does it not? That being a transcendence of the 5,000 year patriarchal tradition. According to Ken Wilber Patriarchy is all about constructing the independence of ego. It falls to the counterpart of patriarchy to fuel the liberation beyond egoism. This drama must escalate and intensify to call forth the principle of supper-session. The Christians have a language for it but it is incomplete. They call it apocalypse and ego teaches them to fear it. But the Jungians teach us that the universal feminine principle is custodian of the global liberation process. Does this not suggest the climax of apocalypse is the emergence of a feminine Christ force? Which is why we can find in quality media utterances such as “the future is female.” The nations that inspire us now (Russia and China) have never surrendered their cultural connection to the feminine principle, unlike the West. I particularly love the spiritual intelligence in your analysis as you walk right up to this understanding and hint so clearly at the deeper drivers within this stage play. Ego verses divine spirit. The Vineyard of the Saker serves this dialectical process masterfully which is why I so respect this site.
Snow Leopard! Hi!
“Which is why we can find in quality media utterances such as “the future is female.”
The problem with that is that fewer and fewer “modern” women, at least in these United States, exude genuine feminine (soft) energy. Ego’s usually trump male or female energy.
The female ego is as untrustworthy as the male ego. All egos are self-protective by deception, self-deception, rationalization (rational lies), and pretenses of various kinds.
In a local town, the female high School basketball team urinated in the opposing teams bottled drinking water. I don’t think that is the soft female Christ energy, or a female future I want to experience.
I once watched a TV special on PBS created by two female psychologists. They would put either a male or female child in a room with toys with the instruction not to play with the toys. The child was watched and videoed through one way glass. Both sexes played with the toys. When asked if they played with the toys, the little girls easily lied comfortably, saying “no” with easy eye contact. The boys also lied but were obviously uncomfortable telling the lie, looking at the floor and shifting weight back and forth between their feet. The feminist psychologists said that the little girls’ ease with lying indicated they were superior socially to the little boys. What I saw was that the female ego is comfortable deceiving others at a very early age and the feminist psychologists believed the ability to deceive others was beneficial.
Tell me about Margaret Thatcher’s unneeded war on the tiny islands off Argentina, and her using police physical abuse on striking coal miners. Tell me about Madalene Albright saying when asked, if the sanctions including medical supplies, she was partly responsible for against Iraq which killed an estimated 500,000 children was un-necessary. She said “she was glad she did it”. Tell me about the Silicon Valley female CEO who sent thousands of jobs to Asia who when asked, said “she’d do it again in a heartbeat.
And then we have Condolissa Rice and her wars, and Nikki Haley, and of course Hillery Clinton who cackled as she watched the assassination by knofe up the rectum of Kadafi.
The problem is always the human ego. Human’s identify with their own self-talk, which is the ego/mind talking to itself. Most humans are in an ego trance. But, with very little practice we can all learn to observe or witness our own ego’s self-deceptions, lies, rationalizations and step beyond them. That part of us that can witness or observe our own ego, I think is the god or Christ spirit, ir Buddha within us all. We just have to use it.
Ego’s don’t want to relinquish their control.
The best to you!
“The problem with that is that fewer and fewer “modern” women, at least in these United States, exude genuine feminine (soft) energy. Ego’s usually trump male or female energy. The female ego is as untrustworthy as the male ego. ”
I think you are right.
In my experience American women, although very aggressive and loud, are probably the weakest mentally of all the women I have ever seen.
the exact opposite compared to Argentinean or even Serbian women (who although much more feminine, would never put up with sexist crap USA women accept like being paid less, no paid maternal leave etc)
I call American and English women MEN with TITS – and most my male American friends (as well as Indians, Latin Americans etc) adopted it.
As aggressive and manly as men – with very little beautiful feminine energy (widespread in say Argentina, Italy, Spain, Serbia, Japan etc)
No wonder all mu English friends married foreign girls
The problem isn’t the human ego, which is normal and natural to all people.
We have to be aware of the “I”, and take it into consideration in all things. I have to be aware of I, of who I am, why I am here, what I am supposed to do, what are my responsibilities, obligations and so forth.
The problem is the toxic, out of control, cancerous ego. The ego that has lost it’s restrictions as a cancerous cell does, and started growing until it threatens to kill the host.
Small children are like this. To a toddler, the world revolves around him and his wants; the biggest part of rearing kids, as every parent knows, is training this out them, showing them the need to consider and live on equal terms, with others.
I was thinking recently of a good example of this “toxic ego” which exists everywhere, but seems to be prevalent among modern day Anglo’s.
This happened in Australia, a couple of decades ago, when I was at Uni and running the Uni Caving Club. Cavers keep contact, we had been asked to support a group in New South Wales who were trying to save a beautiful, unique cave, filled with fantastic limestone formations, from the depredations of a company which mined limestone for concrete. Australia has enough limestone to supply the world for the next 100 yrs, but these guys wanted to destroy something unique, irreplaceable.
We joined with a submission to court to have them stopped, but as our papers went in on Fri and the following Monday was a holiday, the company used the weekend to access the cave and destroy it utterly.
When asked why they had done it, they said proudly “We aren’t going to have a bunch of eco nuts and students tell us what we can do”.
They’d rather destroy something unique, beautiful, irreplaceable, rather than have their perception of their ego’s damaged.
And I fear this is what is running rampant in US now. They are childlike, 2 yr old ego’s, in grown mens bodies. And they would rather destroy the 2000 yr old Syria, the world rather than have “A load of ruskies and that that Putin tell us what we can do”.
Hi Isabella! Actually, the problem IS the ego. And yes, we all have an ego. And yes it helps function in this reality. You are correct when you said “We have to be aware of the ego”. The problem is that the vast majority of humans are not aware of their own ego trance, thus are unable to monitor, witness, or observe it’s deceptions, self-deceptions, and rational lies. Multiply that problem by a few billion people and we have wars and the destruction of the ecosystems.
For the most part, western psychology and psychiatry only help egos function better, which is helpful. But, transformation of individuals, thus the world, is dependent on identifying with our witnessing/observing presence, and not identifying with our ego. It’s not hard. Just takes constant practice. I fall out of ego-witnessing a hundred times a day, but I catch myself and go back a hundred times a day.
Most egos are incapable of being honest even with themselves. All egos depend in various degrees and situations on defenses and pretenses. Often very subtle. Any true spiritual path is to practice monitoring your own ego, which is essentially transcending it. As an aside, more and more people are experiencing egoless non-duality, and function well with a sense of oneness with reality, rather than the ego’s usual sense of a separate identity.
We are now watching the mental illness of the collective ego of nation states.
Nations all have a collective ego based on the combined ego of it’s citizens. Zionism and Israel has a collective ego, as does England, as does Russia, as does the United States. Collective national ego’s are often as irrational and self serving, and self-deceptive and untrustworthy and dangerous as human egos can be.
The problem is always with the ego, and our inability to monitor it and correct it if necessary. The best to you!
Hi Barry This is why I find it necessary to differentiate between ego and rogue ego. Healthy ego is an evolutionary design and can work when its impulses are moderated by its connection to the unconscious. That connection is served by a healthy living culture. This is why the bourgeoisie have a need to prevent culture from carrying out this “rainbow bridge” function. Hence, in capitalism culture is a battle ground. Rogue ego, or negative ego on the other hand is an entirely toxic overloaded ego that has differentiated itself entirely from any connection to the unconscious and severed its roots within it. Rogue ego then usurps the function of the soul and turns against the unconscious and declares total war against its own evolutionary origins. Late capitalism is infested with a collectivity of negative rogue ego that knows nothing but an overriding need to totally dominate all life. In its insanity rogue ego fears that the universe seeks to do to it what it is seeking to do to the living universe. That is annihilate the other to take all power to self. As I see it the capitalist bourgeoisie exemplify the politics of negative rogue ego. For them loss of dominance and control is feared with a psychopathic intensity far greater than the normal fear of death. Isabella’s example above of Australian egomania to me shows how rogue ego can be so mutually reinforcing. Capitalism is now running a form of holy war on behalf of negative rogue ego. The arrogance entailed becomes overwhelming toxic as it reveals its hatred and fear of all real life. Witness the sanctification of the great American hero who died recently. I see here a collective insanity that carries a satanic intensity. Do you not think a very interesting dialectic must emerge from all this?
I feel rather as if you are saying here that, when a smash and grab thief robs a jeweller and then runs away, we are saying “the legs are the problem”. i.e. if he didn’t have legs to run on, then the offense would not occur.
Most things we have, like ego, like rational thought, like emotion and feelings, are like a sword. They come two edged and we have to choose how to use them.
The “toxic cancerous ego” as I think of it, has been allowed to dominate a person, by that person.
It’s isn’t the ego that is fault then, but the entity that chooses to indulge in this path.
I fear that by saying “it’s always the ego” that gives one an “out”, rather as saying “we are all born as we are and cannot change” does. It’s the old “you can’t blame me for knifing that guy while I was in a drunken rage – I was born with genes that make me what I am, it’s not my fault”.
Fact is, we can choose, we do know right from wrong, and we need to be able to be blamed when we make choices that are destructive, especially of other people.
Best wishes to you also Barry.
Sorry Snow Leopard and Isabella! In all those words and complex explanations, all I see are egos cleverly trying to defend ego, even dividing ego into two (ego and rogue ego). The point I have been making is exceedingly simple but egos refuse to give up the fight for their own veracity. The human brain makes up its own concept of itself (the ego) and spends the rest of it’s life defending that self concept. The ego becomes it’s own self-righteous god. It can self-righteously justify almost anything on it’s own behalf.
I have no doubt that you both identify with your self talk as yourself, as do most humans. But it’s only your brain’s self constructed ego talking to itself. I contend, by much experience, and the experience of others, that who we really are, is the consciousness which can witness and observe the voice in the head (ego), and decide if that voice has a valid point of view or not. What you call rogue ego is an ego running amuck with no witness observing and correcting it, if necessary. It’s a very simple thing to grasp and practice.
Put another way, the idea is to use your brain to think, when you want to think, rather than let your brain (and it’s ego construct) continuously think you. A subtle but enormous life changing difference. Your ego is thinking you and you believe it is you. Any authentic spiritual practice (I’m not talking about religion), offers a method of self-observation, whereby one can differentiate between one’s witnessing self and their own ego. The clearest and most helpful explanation can be found in “The Power Of Now” by Eckart Tolle, which includes five very easy techniques.
I have no need to go further with this. It’s quite simple, and you can prove to yourself that you are way beyond your own ego in about ten minutes of quietly observing your own self-talk (which everyone does), when you realize that you are witnessing your self talk (ego), you are obviously something prior to your ego. It’s quite probable that your own ego will avoid playing with this because it will push the ego off of it’s throne.
Enough of this. I have no need to express my viewpoint further. I know it’s validity by personal experience. Any further comments are only egos arguing to be right, therefore “better than”. Another ego game played on the personal or national level.
The best to you both!
Actually the West’s elevating of women is probably because the Western system is running a shortage of manpower at many levels, which causes them to appeal to women to replenish their ranks and to encourage competition between men and women, in hopes of getting men back into the fold.
This is in line with historical patterns, organized groups(nations,religions,armies,etc) don’t usually have women among their ranks in their first day and when they are doing well, but when they are in decline and nearing the end there usually are women among their ranks.
Almost, but not exactly. The goal was simply to decrease labor costs. A woman’s labor value traditionally accrued to her family. This is labor value lost to the Capitalist market. Bringing women into the labor force increases competition and drives down costs. This results in an increased upward flow of wealth to management and owners. In a Capitalist economy shortages only exist in the short term. If you want more of something, you pay more. If actual labor shortages existed, the value of labor would simply increase. In the United States, the Federal hourly minimum wage is currently only $7.25 an hour. Minimum hourly wage in say, 1972, was a $1.60, an increase of less than five fold over that period. Over the same period, the costs of a college education, housing and medical care have risen from ten to fifteen times. These numbers show an extreme loss of market labor value over that period. Indicating, if anything, an extreme labor surplus.
Regarding Supremacist Israeli brutality against the Palestinians and the larger middle East (more?) I’m reminded of the statement by the Liberal Paragon US President Lyndon B. Johnson..
“I’ll tell you what’s at the bottom of it. If you can convince the lowest (white) man that he’s better than the best (colored, next) man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you..”
The article is correct in all aspects except when it presents the US as a sovereign state, when in fact it is not.
Until 1776 the American colonies were ruled by the English Crown and after 1776 by the Rothschilds banking empire, which created the United States of America and the American ethnic group. Geography was used to create something artificial. The Rothschilds control of the US was strengthened in 1913 with the creation of the US Federal Reserve, a private central bank.
When it comes to Britain, it is Zionist run. The center of power rests in the City of London, which is an independent state run by the Rothschilds, and one that is outside the jurisdiction of the British Parliament, something few people know. The Queen of England is the Chief Executive Officer of the Rothschilds banking empire, having dictatorial powers. She has the right to declare war without explanation, the right to dissolve Parliament without explanation, the right to remove a Prime Minister without explanation, the right to appoint generals, admirals and all intelligence chiefs, etc. Britain in 1914 entered the First World War when the King of England instructed his Foreign Minister to declare war on Germany, with neither the Government nor Parliament being consulted.
The Rothschilds chief weapons are subversion and war. Their Zionist grandfathers returned from Holland to England in the 17th century, when they used their agent Oliver Cromwell to start a rebellion against the King of England, who was subsequently executed. These methods were used in America in 1776, in France in 1789 and in Russia in 1917. They are still being used.
The Rothschilds control the US through the Rockerfellers. The US is nothing more than a private fief of private bankers, who use it for wars of aggression and for the establishment of a globalist banking empire. How many wars has the US fought ? How many times was Britain a US ally ?
For the Anglo-American bankers the chief source of concern was the creation of a German-Russian-Chinese economic alliance, and the rise of Eurasia, something Bismarck advocated. Two world wars were fought to prevent this, namely a German-Russian alliance. Germany was twice defeated. Russia survived, has again risen and has formed a partnership with China. This partnership is attracting Germany.
What do we have now ? An Anglo-American political, economic and military offensive directed primarily against Russia, and this offensive has achieved opposite effects to those anticipated. Russia is on the rise. It has been joined by China.
And Germany ? Well, the Anglo-Americans could not apply military methods for a third time, as Germany is a NATO member. The well tried method of internal subversion was adopted, Merkel being forced to accept more than one million false refugees, who did create financial, political and ethnic troubles for the country. However, this resulted in driving the German industrial elite straight towards Russia and China. Merkel is now balancing between Anglo-Americans and German industrialists. Not even she dared terminate the building of the Nord Stream – 2 gas pipeline.
We now have a very messy and a very dangerous international situation. The Anglo-Americans are seeing their banking empire collapse. They are provoking conflicts in Syria, Iran and North Korea. According to one source, they are forcing Poroshenko to attack the Donbass on September 14th, as a direct result of the Russian-Syrian offensive against ISIS in idlib. The impression is that Russia will not back down. We shall now see how this ends.
Thank you for such a well-written concise historical synopsis that leads right up to the present moment.
It seems Donbass and Syrian theaters are being positioned to be used optimally against the RF. I am sure the RF is aware and prepared, but we may not see how it ends for sometime.
Pray, pray, pray.
Yes, the Donbass is prepared. It has even warned the Ukrainian military that it is expecting their attack. However, NATO will have the final word. Poroshenko is nothing but a puppet, doing as told. If necessary, he will be sacrificed for geopolitical aims. The next days will be interesting.
You are touching the truth from its corner, but you are quite wrong in your major assumptions. Rothschilds do not control the US through the Rockerfellers at all. The simplest evidence is the vicious attacks against Trump. There are much more indicating that currently those two are at each others throat. I would recommend you to watch this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBw6ZKg3b14&list=FL8tI58GlnMdr1gp9DcZsDrw&t=302s&index=3&pbjreload=10). You are correct to say that both WWs were instigated by these oligarchic groups, but got quite mixed up in your assumptions and deductions again. I would strongly recommend you to read (https://orientalreview.org/2018/08/09/the-unpleasant-truth-about-the-1941-parachuting-of-rudolf-hess-in-england-i/). To sum up, Germany was a patsy financed by American bankers to destroy City of London and other imperial powers of the day like France, Holland and Belgium (succeeded). Germany turned itself over to GB thus backstabbing US bankers in 1941. Roosevelt who was against the war up to that point changed his mind abruptly (I would rather say the ruling bankers changed their minds) to enter the great war. Britain wanted to use Germany as an attack dog against Russia and they succeeded. The yankee doodle was a good ally with Stalin (no different than Putin). US helped Stalin by sending millions of tons of heavy arms for a good reason. Britain (House of Royals) was the biggest loser of the WWII. British Pound lost the reserve currency status to the US dollar. GB and France was kicked out of the Middle East at the beginning of the 50s (Suez canal crisis) and the Yankee Doodle came in. After the war, Soviets gave lots of privileges to the Yankee Doodle to extract oil on Russian soil, which the contemporary history never mentions. Russia today is again an excellent ally to Yankee Doodle contrary to all the Alt-Med hysterics. There will be two kings running the world. The eastern king is China. The western king is yet to be established.
The world IS a unified unity already and always will be. What is missing is not unity but clarity and sanity. This may be nitpicking with an otherwise superlative piece of insight by the OP.
”While Soros has managed to thoroughly destabilise The European Union by promoting mass immigration and open borders, divided the United States by funding Black Lives Matter and corrupting the very corruptible US political class, and destroyed Ukraine by pushing for an illegal coup of a democratically elected government using neo-Nazi strong men…one country that Soros has not been able to crack has been The Russian Federation.”
Unlike the West’s 99% Soros, while rotten to the core, obviously is an intelligent piece of excrement. Alex Christoforou’s verdict quoted above is right except for the notion that George Soros destabilised the EU all by himself, thus making it sound like he caught poor little innocent EU unawares. The fact of the matter is that the West’s ruling Zionazi corporatocracy — with Soros one of its most arrogant, vocal, hard-core members — is working together with the aim of trashing, once and for all, their own mass base: the West’s grovelling, deluded middle classes and labour aristocracies. Imperialist wars are how the population transfers to the EU are kept going; these transfers now form part of the war objectives proper. Hence, the screams from the Euro-trash about ”immivaders” and ”population replacement schemes” are not to be dismissed entirely as expressions of reactionary hallucinations and paranoia. Whitey is being scorned by the imperialists indeed and it hurts badly. The prospect of life without imperialist super-wages and, with them, the loss of all the beautiful social peace and stability characteristic of Western Europe is a very real source of anxiety.
As regards the relations between Soros and the truly moronic populations of the US and the Ukraine, I feel strongly inclined to say that Soros understands his moral peers very well indeed.
True, Russia hasn’t been subdued by Soros. Lousy anti-semites, LOL.
I respect the Saker site as one of the most highly evolved in-on the world earth.
I concur: What I perceive the point to be ~~ gaunlets of the western global money mafia and east (far-near-middle) power blocs, joining against the corrupted west the south, Et Al ~~ are now in the cosmic reality enema phase.
Does any being actually know for certain how the inferno swallows our reality?
Intuition is the energy to be sure.
Thanks again Saker, an enlightening T’ai Chi experience as always.
The question is: “When China would be a Vassal region of Satan”, as many other Regions?
Can we all take a few deep breaths here please. I am getting a little sick and tired of how the “enlightened ” alt media goes on and on extolling the virtues of the Silk Road Project, the BRICS ” resistance”, various new financial clearing systems etc. , while virtually all of these have been brought into being with the cooperation, support, and even promotion of the global powers that be. So instead of a Unipolar Totalitarian Surveillance State, we can enjoy a Multipolar Totalitarian Surveillance State. I feel so much better. The central bank of China is a Rothschild Bank.
Do you have any evidence to back up your assertion about the Central Bank of China being Rothschild?
“Give me control over a nations currency, and I care not who makes its laws” – Baron M.A. Rothschild.
ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:
Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan
Albania: Bank of Albania
Algeria: Bank of Algeria
Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina
Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia
Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba
Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia
Austria: Austrian National Bank
Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus
Belgium: National Bank of Belgium
Belize: Central Bank of Belize
Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Came Roon: Bank of Central African States
Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada
Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority
Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chile: Central Bank of Chile
China: The People’s Bank of China
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
European Union: European Central Bank
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority
China’s fascination with the Rothschild family
Thank you for your response. The site you refer me to is interesting. To say that some people in China have an interest in the Rothschild network and may be doing business with them is one thing. The list of banks controlled by them is also interesting. But I have to say that putting The People’s Bank of China on that list is not proof of the point. One could argue that it is a case of over enthusiasm on the part of the people who compiled the list. I suspect this is the case. As far as I know the banking system of China is run by the Communist party. I would be most interested to read of how the Communist party of China would be so self destructive as to allow their central bank to be taken over by capitalists. Current Chinese policies seem to indicate that the party is still running the show. “China is communist dammit.” The Chinese can be very cunning and savvy in business dealings. Their subtlety is not to be underestimated. They know how to sup with the devil and still walk away with their independence afterward. So harder proof is needed to substantiate your assertion. Do you have it?
Communist Shmomunist. Money, power and the pursuit thereof has always ruled. For some very concise and straightforward “proofs” of how the “multipolar” world is taking shape, I would recommend the work of James Corbett. “The Corbett Report”. Could you please explain the difference between a communist totalitarian surveillance state and a capitalist totalitarian surveillance state?
A very reasonable question Frederick. First, your statement about the pursuit of money and power always ruling is too sweepingly general and not accurate. It does not rule in Cuba for one example. I could give other examples. It does not rule in Iran. It does not rule in China and I doubt that it rules in Vietnam. It does not rule in North Korea. Money and power are always issues relevant to government but that does not mean that that pursuit necessarily rules. If one thinks it does then it is highly probable that one is judging the issue through a Western lens. It does not rule in Venezuela. It did not rule in Ecuador under the previous leader. it does not rule in Russia today. Soviet Russia was a complex case I will not comment on right now. All of these countries that I have mentioned are under constant attack from the capitalist empire precisely because the pursuit of money and power does NOT rule. Corbett I would not trust because he is American and works for the established media. So he will have layers of American ideological bias programmed into him. It is noteworthy that Anglo Americans have great difficulty imagining social systems that do not operate according to the logic that the west is familiar with.
With regards to your question, what is the difference; The short answer is motive. Capitalist totalitarianism is based on a desire to subjugate the many on behalf of the private selfish interests of the few who do serve money wealth and power. It is called fascism. The difficult truth is all government has to be some form of dictatorship. There is no other choice. For the simple reason that social stability requires consistency. For which government is responsible. Consistency of government over time requires the continuation of some primary principle or value that can preserve that consistency. That primary value must “dictate.” This is to guard against unpredictable passions destabilizing society. The only real choice is the quality of the dictatorship. Even the Christians accept the value of dictatorship. They live for the day when Christ will rule the world with a rod of Iron. Now the dictatorship of Christ is in their eyes the ideal government. You could call that the totalitarian dictatorship of Christ and God. Plato says essentially the same thing. The real trick is to create a totalitarian dictatorship that fulfills the aspirations of democracy. To resolve the tension between the rulers and the ruled. That is the goal of world civilization. That is the goal of the Chinese government along with all genuinely Communist governments and parties. To this end communism strives to create a political culture that nurtures the quality of motivation of the powerful on behalf of service to the greater good of humanity. The Chinese understand this far more deeply than Westerners are permitted to recognize. Putin operates this way. I know little of Corbett but suspect he has little inclination of this. So he will probably come up with explanations for world affairs that do not take this into consideration. If he did I could not imagine him being allowed on the air in this capitalist fascist dictatorship.
You may argue that China’s surveillance program proves its evil dictatorial nature. I would strongly disagree. Bitter experience has shown that all socialist states get attacked by the capitalists in a great variety of ways. This forces them to go into self protection mode which requires spying on their own societies. This is a responsible form of self protection on the part of governments seeking to protect the state from attack. But when this happens the Capitalists gain a propaganda windfall. They then accuse these governments of being oppressive of their own people. If they don’t they are destroyed. If they do they are accused of being oppressive dictatorships. How convenient for the evil capitalists. Here in the West it is a major propaganda imperative to prevent people such as yourself from having the awareness that enables them to make this vital distinction. Again, the answer to your question is motive.
I imagine you are a rather young individual. As your view of the world reflects a naïveté probably due simply to lack of exposure. I mean no disrespect here. I can only suggest that you need to look much deeper than you have to find how the global infrastructure operates. Rely less on the “experts” and more on your own intuition and heart.
Do your own research, but go to the source. My best to you on your journey.
In China the State is raising the living standards of all its people. In the West, neo-liberalism is destroying the lives of the vast bulk of the populace, with Greece the worst example, to the sole benefit of a tiny elite of psychopathic, insatiably greedy, parasites, and literally destroying various foreign countries through military aggression, subversion and vicious sanctions. I see those as ‘major’ differences.
Very true, Mulga. Another not-so-minor difference which is very tantalizing to delve into is the legacy of revolution in the US on one hand and China/Russia on the other. Western supremacists, most notably of the silly ’anti-authoritarian’ bent, are at a loss explaining how the utterly oppressed Chinese and Russians could make revolution without access to private firearms — the latter exclusively available to the forces of reaction — and why there is no urge to lethal gun violence in these societies. Ergo: When the ’act of revolution’ amounts to premeditated land-grabbing, racist genocide, enslavement, and ecocide by fanatical, greedy Euro-squatters, the indelible mark left behind looks quite ’exceptional’ indeed.
In short, Western supremacists suffer from a false ’Earth-is-flat’ worldview with no distinctions between Oppressor nations and Oppressed nations. Enter all their sour grapes against the Russian and Chinese revolutions (damning the past) as well as Russia’s and China’s success stories this century (damning the present).
Again, if we dig deep enough in our research we will find that both China and the Soviet Union (at that time} came into their present form on the backs of the global banking cabal. The same global banking cabal that also brought you your evil “western supremacists”. Those at the the top of the pyramid have no interest in national sovereignties, ethnicities, races, religions except to the degree that these can be manipulated, divided, and harvested, over and over and over again, no matter where their geographical location.They have financed both sides of every major war in history. They have no interest or need for any of our concerns. It’s a very exclusive club, and we’re not in it.
Do your homework.
Frederick; Are you saying the global banking cartel created the socialist revolutions?
I am saying that the global banking cartel, along with certain other factions (military/industrial/corporate complex) (intelligence communities) (The religious faction) (Royal bloodlines) (A little known post war nazi-international organization with unlimited laundered booty from WW II), laundered, by the way, thru the Intl banking cartel, and a couple of other factions create pretty much whatever they choose. Revolutions, along with other well meaning social actions feed perfectly the end game. Revolutions create chaos, division, separation always looking for a savior to make things right. A totalitarian global surveillance state is the end game. Our hearts and minds are smothered every day by such important information such as what bathroom we should use, or which color human being is now supposed to matter, or what did those evil Russkes do today or what sex should I be on Tuesday. While the global oligarchs restructure the financial system to their liking, create and implement A I, and have us salivating over our soon to be imposed 5G electronic prison. I believe the peddle is to the metal for the globalists as too many of us have awakened. Everything up to this point has just been practice.