By Rostislav Ishchenko
Translated by Ollie Richardson and Angelina Siard
cross posted with https://www.stalkerzone.org/the-new-master-of-ukraine/
Ukraine received a new master, irrespective of who will take the presidency.
The master is named Igor Valeryevich Kolomoisky. It is he who detailed and implemented the scenario of the first round of voting in such a way that Poroshenko – who progressed to the second round, Tymoshenko – who didn’t progress, Boyko – who took fourth place, and also the oligarchical groups that place a stake on each of them, found themselves being completely dependent on Kolomoisky.
We don’t know how he managed to establish control over territorial election commissions, which had to provide the counting of votes for the benefit of Yuliya Tymoshenko. But we can assume that Yuliya Tymoshenko and her headquarters gave him this control within the framework of an agreement on a joint fight against Poroshenko. Yuliya Tymoshenko’s mentality and her environment did not allow either of them to assume that Kolomoisky will agree with the president (even if it is temporary). After all, it is precisely Poroshenko who took away “Ukrneft” and “Privatbank“ from Kolomoisky, drove him out of the country, and seriously nibbled on his business assets. Therefore, they did not see any problem in tasking Kolomoisky with working with commissions. After all, Zelensky (who was propelled forward by Kolomoisky) succeeded to progress to the second round anyway. Kolomoisky, (according to Tymoshenko) could not come to an arrangement with Poroshenko, and nobody else could compete with Yuliya Tymoshenko in the fight for a place in the second round. Tymoshenko’s HQ considered that it will only be profitable for Kolomoisky to build a derby of his candidates in the second round. Besides this, buying off commissions cost a lot, and Kolomoisky is known for paying without bargaining, while Tymoshenko got used to not spending, but earning money during political campaigns. So why not allow Kolomoisky to pay for the loyalty of the commissions? After all, he is an ally, and it’s not seen that he has options for changing his partner.
Igor Kolomoisky turned out to be much cleverer than all other Ukrainian politicians. He forecasted the situation further than the first move. It is obvious that as soon as Poroshenko started to lose his chances of keeping the presidency, Tymoshenko’s interest in cooperating with Kolomoisky had to promptly fall. Why would she need to share power with his stooge, knowing firsthand how difficult working with Igor Kolomoisky is. It is possible to try to become the sole leader. Especially since the entire Ukrainian oligarchy was afraid of, and hated, Kolomoisky for being too clever and unpredictable and easily outplaying all of them in any conflict.
Generally, by arriving with Zelensky in the second round of voting, Tymoshenko would’ve – practically with guarantee – started to bring together an anti-Kolomoisky coalition. It shouldn’t be excluded that she would’ve succeeded to make Poroshenko (from the remains of his administrative resource) join this affair, having promised to preserve his property and freedom after her arrival to power. And even if she wouldn’t have done this, then she nevertheless had the opportunity, and in politics it’s intentions, not opportunities, that are evaluated. Especially since Tymoshenko never thought about fidelity to her colleagues in the fight and sold them every time as soon as the need to have them disappeared and a buyer was found. But Kolomoisky not only did an overtaking manoeuvre, having committed treason before being betrayed himself. This did not solve for him the problem of the second round, because the Poroshenko who progressed to the second round became the same point of assembly for all the anti-Kolomoisky forces, which Tymoshenko could’ve been instead. And it is unknown who would be more dangerous for Kolomoisky.
Kolomoisky played with two partners at the same time. On the one hand, by using his control over Tymoshenko’s commissions, he gave Poroshenko a free pass to the second round. I think that Yuliya Tymoshenko rejected the idea of creating a scandal concerning falsifications not least because they happened in those territorial election commissions where her people were sat. They simply committed falsifications not in her favour. To be indignant with your own appointees, accusing them of falsifications, looks not only stupid, but also dangerous, since nobody will work with you after this.
On the other hand, Kolomoisky ensured a huge advantage in votes for his stooge. Zelensky collected 165,000 more votes than Poroshenko and Tymoshenko combined. This move has huge psychological value. Knowing to what extent Tymoshenko and Poroshenko’s electorates are mutually exclusive, nobody will believe that their voters will unite against Zelensky. It’s rather the voters of Tymoshenko who will support the stooge of Kolomoisky. There is a similar situation with Yury Boyko’s voters too. But Boyko + Tymoshenko + Zelensky = nearly 10.5 million votes. Even if 1.5 million will not come to the election or will vote for someone else, victory in the second round is more than guaranteed.
Moreover, Poroshenko, Tymoshenko, and Boyko’s results were located very closely. Between 2nd and 4th place the difference is about 4% and is less than 800,000 votes. This gives Kolomoisky a good reserve for the parliamentary election, which is supposed to take place in the autumn, but can be carried out ahead of schedule (whilst the people’s belief in the “noble comedian” hasn’t yet deflated). If the parliamentary election correlates in general with the presidential one, then, having entered the list of Zelensky’s party “Servant of the People” into parliament, Kolomoisky will receive “golden stock”. A possible certain drop in the level of support for Zelensky can be partially compensated for by pointing to the fact that the “oligarchical parliament” does not allow the “people’s president” to assert himself. The main compensator, allowing even to improve the parliamentary election result, should be Poroshenko’s electorate. In any society 5-10% of active voters vote for any government. But if Zelensky is elected as president, then he will already be “any government”, and this means that these 1-2 million voters will join the ranks of his supporters.
If the results of the parliamentary election at least partially correlate with the results of the presidential one (and they will correlate even more than they usually do), then five-six party projects will be able to enter the Rada. Smeshko can join somebody, but independently he will not bring his party to the Rada. The passage of Poroshenko’s “Solidarity” party to the Rada is also under question. Taking into account the overflow of votes to Zelensky and their outflow from Poroshenko, a coalition can be formed either with Boyko or with Tymoshenko, or with both of them. If it is necessary, it can be strengthened by the minority party project of Lyashko, who is always ready for services of this sort.
Kolomoisky has already shown how he is able to control voting. So there is practically no doubt that the parties he needs will receive the necessary number of votes. He has one problem – the very probable disloyalty of Zelensky after he becomes president, gains power, and oligarchs will begin to come to him with the offer to have their wallet and their people in state office. But since this problem lies on the surface, Kolomoisky should foresee it, especially since it is possible to solve it in several ways, without particularly straining himself.
Look at that big Elephant in the corner of the room? Look at it!!!! ;)
Haaretz about Igor Kolomoisky . :” Is this man the most powerful Jew in the World ?”
In the same article: “Kolomoisky was photographed proudly wearing a particularly scandalous T-shirt. It combined the Jewish emblem of the menorah along with the Ukrainian ultranationalist symbol of a trident, and all in red and black. Beneath it said “Zhidobandera” – an amalgamation of a Russian-Ukrainian word for Jews, and the name of Stepan Bandera”.
The Times of Israel : “ Volodymyr Zelenksy’s mother is Jewish and the candidate identifies as such .”
Lubavitch spokesman Kapulkin is cautious :“If the situation in Ukraine improves, they will call Zelensky a Ukrainian, but if the situation worsens, they will call him a Jew.”
Amazing : Jews and Bandera united in the war against Russia .
Hitler Time is finally forgotten or is it ?
‘Better pick a pocket or two…’
Isn’t Kolomoisky a citizen of Israel? Bingo.
Khazarstan in the making, actually near completion. Dnepropetrovsk ‘Jerusalem on the Dnieper’.
The “Judeobanderist” thing essentially epitomises what “independent Ukraine” is – a vulgar paradox. There are many Jewish Nazi lovers in positions of power there.
I’ll give you one example here:
That Zionism is for the Jews as Nazism was for the Germans (although much more powerful and long-lasting)has been pretty plain for a long while. That Zionazism today stands as one of the firmest allies, patrons and enablers of neo-fascism and neo-Nazism in the West, and in India with the Hindutva fascists, all in pursuit of a ‘Clash of Civilizations’ war on Islam, is pretty loathsome, and will not end prettily. But the Zionazis have their Fuhrer, Satan-yahoo, their seemingly impregnable redoubt, Talmudistan, and their kosher Reich seems invincible, just as the Germans did when they crossed the Volga in Stalingrad in late 1942.
Hindutva is about population politics. India with 10% muslim population will become muslim vassal state of SA if the population does not stop increasing. They don’t believe in birth control while hindus do. (the christians don’t either). With 1.3B and counting, they want the country to explode into chaos and then take over. Hindutva is a wrapper around a whole lot of social and economic problems without breaking down the bits to the under educated.
The percentage of Moslems in the Indian population rose from 9.8% in 1951 to 14.23% in 2011, ie an increase of less than 5% in sixty years. At that rate it will take until about 2430, give or take, for India to become majority Islamic. In any case, a few more decades of unchecked anthropogenic climate destabilisation will see the wet bulb temperature in India surpass the 35 degree level, that is the limit of human metabolic tolerance, in summer, so India will be radically depopulated.
India will be radically depopulated.
These guys placed a space probe around Mars. They could probably place some sort of shade shield in Earth orbit in a decade or two. Better hope they get the right balance, or else get used to trying to farm on top of several kilometers of ice.
They’ll need to get a move on, Ted. Time’s running out.
Aluminium powder. Although I haven’t done the math.
Then we’ll all get Alzheimer’s. Oh, I see.
@Demodok: “Amazing : Jews and Bandera united in the war against Russia .
Hitler Time is finally forgotten or is it ?”
The Anglo Zio Capitalists who encouraged Fascism in Europe, financed Hitler, and armed Nazi Germany to make war on Russia have never gone away, just bided their time to take revenge for their defeat by Russia in WW2. Read ‘The Chamberlain-Hitler Collusion’ by Clement Leibovitz. Not only Britain but France and Poland colluded to install Fascism over the whole of prewar Eastern Europe. Their encouragement of Hitler to make war against Soviet Russia cost 50 Million lives (though Britain, France and the U$A themselves got off relatively unscathed in WW2). And now the AZC are reviving Fascism in Europe for WW3 — a nuclear war against post-Soviet Russia which will cost a Billion lives — certainly destroying most of Britain, France and the U$A for a start.
Dr NG Maroudas
Professional historians prefer to write about events only after a 40 year grace period, so that they have time to obtain all the facts. As far as the Second World War is concerned, it obviously required more than 40 years for all the facts to become visible.
There are many things about the war which make no sense, the chief one being Germany’s ability to finance a world war. In fact it did so on two occasions.
Hitler is appointed to power in 1933 and theatrically closes down three Rothschild’s banks in Germany, proving that he was anti-Zionist. Or was he ? Historians like to omit the fact that in 1931 the Bank of International Settlement was opened in Basel, Switzerland, right next to the German border. It was this Bank which financed Hitler’s war machine, not excluding Wall Street’s investments in Germany after World War One, like Henry Ford building truck factories which supplied the German Army with it’s transport.
Then, of course, we have the question of the real identity of Adolf Hitler. An Austrian second rate artist comes to Germany and becomes dictator. Strange. Since when do second rate artists become dictators, especially in this case when we had a man who never finished high school and never went to university, yet showed great talent for domestic politics, international relations, economics and military matters. Did somebody train him for this role ? Who could that be ? And then we have his final days in Berlin. Did he really commit suicide ? For some reason historians ignore the fact that his bunker had four escape tunnels. In Argentina and Japan it’s common knowledge that he escaped. One analyst has even gone so far to state that in 1961 Hitler spent his vacation in Hawaii, his host being George Bush, the future President of the US. If true, then this should not be surprising, since Prescott Bush, George Bush’s father, financed Hitler, which is common knowledge.
Hitler, like Napoleon, was a proxy fighter, Both were financed by private bankers, Napoleon by the Rothschild’s and Hitler by the Rothschild’s and Wall Street bankers. Both Napoleon and Hitler had one chief task, and that was to invade and break up Russia. Both failed. Their role has now been taken over by NATO, backed by the EU, which is a civilian component of NATO.
The relationship between Zionism and Nazism will need further investigation, especially if you look at the situation in Ukraine, where neo-Nazis openly support Zionists like Yats, Poroshenko (Watsman) and Tymoshenko. I presume Zelenskiy will also get some support, as the others did.
I thought the plan was to build up Germany and then intentionally cause it to self-destruct. Germany was never supposed to win. If so, then the bankers would have written the Versailles treaty to benefit Austria and Germany. There would be no Hitler, no Nazis, and no need for WW II.
Without WW II, the Soviet Union would not have united so strongly against a (US and UK banker-sponsored) common enemy and industrialized.
Without WW II, NATO would not exist.
Without WW II and the Holocaust, there would not be a worldwide taboo against saying anything negative about Israel and Jewish people.
Without WW II, there would not be a European Union.
Without WW II, there would not be a European Union passing draconian censorship laws. Fascism is indeed being installed throughout Europe.
Other than for the mass influx of non-white people into Europe, Hitler would be proud. By the way, what does the creation of Muslim ghettos throughout Europe achieve? Do European countries really want to have Detroit-style cities populated by people who cannot assimilate?
“Amazing : Jews and Bandera united in the war against Russia .”
Stepan Bandera – the unfaithful son of the Jewish people – excerpt
March 13, 2014
“And often the Jew is the one who is never suspicious of this.” – Erich Maria Remarque
Read on several Ukrainian forums, dug in the internet.
Natsik, this is for you for a snack. That is why Tsilya (Yulia Timoshenko-Telegina-Kapitelman)
is in love with you, you are one with her blood.
Stepan Bandera – baptized Jew, Uniate. Greek Catholic from the village of Ugryniv Stary near
Kalush, born during the Austro-Hungarian rule in Galicia.
Father: Adrian Bandera is a Greek Catholic from the petty-bourgeois family of Moishe and
Rosalia (nee Beletskaya, Polish by nationality) Bandera. Rose is a typical Ukrainian name,
but what about sho?
Mother: Miroslava Glodzinskaya is a Polish Jewish woman, such Jews are also called
GALAHIC, that is, by their mother.
Stepan (Stefan) was the second child after the older sister Martha.
Stepan Bandera was arrested by the Gestapo (yes, you read correctly) in September 1941 and spent most of the war years interned in the concentration camp of Sachsenhausen.
Stepan Bandera was not tried at Nuremberg or convicted of war crimes while
living in Germany after WWII. So, why call him a fascist?
“Bandera’s/Banderites’ Nuremberg files are there in the archives and some of
the content has been circulated online. Don’t read it. You’ll have nightmares.”
Who was financing Stepan Bandera whilst he was living in Munich
after the war?
Bandera in the classification of the CIA was held under
the number EGMA 128250 – excerpts
February 16, 2018
The next tranche of documents from the archives of the CIA, declassified at the
end of January 2017, became a real bomb for the Organization of Ukrainian
Nationalists (OUN) *. It turns out that its leader Stepan Bandera was on the
salary of the US special services, and not just Adolf Hitler. The secrets of the
CIA from the “Ukrainian portfolio” refer to the period from the late 1940s to the
early 1990s. It turned out that the United States regularly paid Ukrainian na-
tionalists for all the dirty work that they did. Uncle Sam paid for the mass kill-
ings of OUN * civilians in Ukraine, sabotage in the system of social production,
special operations in power structures and the entire abomination of the global
geopolitical, military, economic and ideological confrontation of 1946-1991.
The CIA document Bandera registered under the number EGMA 128250
January 15, 1955. According to the petition of the CIA resident from
Munich to the head of intelligence in Washington – a US visa, which
gang wars – its like reading a mag in 1930’s Chicago – but its Ukraine….very interesting article – how weird that those same – now old – gangsters have out there – why not take the money and run ?
Swiss Trade Newspaper
Swiss oligarch becomes governor in Ukraine
Igor Kolomoisky is the new governor of Dnipropetrovsk. The oligarch has chosen Geneva as its center
of life – and is having a duel with a Swiss company.
By Christian Bütikofer
on March 5, 2014
We had the great schizophrenic, Russia has the little schizophrenic. “Igor Kolomoisky did not mince his
words at his inaugural conference as the new governor of Dnipropetrovsky when he spoke on Sunday
about Ukraine’s ex-president Viktor Yanukovych and Russian President Vladimir Putin. It was almost
expected that Kolomoisky would take on many – including Russian oligarchs. He applies to longtime
observers as a man of conflicts.
Kolomoisky is the third richest Ukrainian, one of the country’s most powerful oligarchs, a constantly
belligerent politically uncomfortable and active member of the Jewish community. Now he was appoint-
ed by the Ukrainian interim president Alexander Turtschow head of Dnepropetrovsk. In Switzerland, Kolomoisky stated that he was living in Geneva.
Colleague had entry ban in USA
Igor Kolomoisky is President of the Geneva Foundations EJU – European Jewish Union and ECJC – Eu-
ropean Council of Jewish Community. The secretary in both organizations is Vadim Rabinovich, another Ukrainian oligarch whose life has been immortalized in a non-fiction book.
This is highly controversial, especially in the United States: The US refused to allow Rabinovich to enter
the country because it accused him of “alleged involvement in organized crime, money laundering, drug smuggling and the sale of war weapons to North Korea and Iraq, killings and other crimes” , These alle-
gations are highly controversial. Nevertheless, they stick to him until today.
The Geneva Foundations of the two have a c / o address with the trustees of Firex Audit & Consulting,
whose books were reviewed by the Alexander-Yanukovich friend and former FC Sion board member
Joseph Eric Riedweg.
Coup against Swissport
Kolomoisky is also known in the Swiss aviation scene: The airport service provider Swissport is not very
good at talking to the oligarchs. In 2006, the Swiss-based company operating in the ground and air freight business established a joint venture together with the then state-owned Ukraine International Airline – 70 percent of the shares belonged to Swissport.
When the partner company was sold to Igor Kolomoisky and another oligarch – Aaron Mayberg – in 2011,
the Swiss lost control of the company. Kolomoisky and Co. successfully argued in court that Swissport
curtailed the rights of minority shareholders. From one day to the other was Swissport at the door – and
should have received $ 400,000 for the loss of the company. But not even these “peanuts” arrived.
In autumn 2013, Swissport was still right in the third instance: the 70 percent share was again awarded
to the Swiss – but only on paper. The processing now starts again from the beginning, before the lower authorities.
Putin to Kolomoisky: «Unique cheater»
In parallel, they tried to agree with Igor Kolomoisky and Aaron Mayberg: “We have met several times in Geneva, where is the center of life of this gentleman,” said Mark Skinner of Swissport to SRF. So far, the haggling continues – and should take even longer.
For Igor Kolomoisky announced after taking office, he now let all his business rest until he resign his po-
litical office. On Tuesday, Russia’s president and sportsman (judo, fishing, hunting …)
Vladimir Putin – of course quite selfless – scourged the appointment of billionaires in Ukraine as
governors. And at Kolomoisky, the Kremlin ruler expressed his own opinion: “He is a unique cheater.”
Beginnings with computers
Igor Kolomoisky’s business origins can be traced back to 1983. At that time he was dealing with comput-
ers. In 1992 he was one of the founders of PrivatBank. Later, he graduated from the Metallurgical
Institute with an engineering degree.
During the Orange Revolution in 2005, he joined the camp of Yulia Tymoshenko and denied the Russia-
friendly President Kuchma the followers. However, during Timoshenko’s reign as Prime Minister, his re-
lations with her deteriorated greatly, as she became a nationalist of previously privatized companies,
which also affected some of his companies. However, even after the differences he did not face frontal
against Tymoshenko. Kolomoisky is a skilful tactician – and that includes seeking and obtaining Israeli citizenship, leaving many options open.
Iron and steel pope
Unlike many other oligarchs of Ukraine, Igor Kolomoisky survived the global financial crisis relatively unscathed. In 2010, he had more than 200 companies in the game. The most important group is the
private group to which the TV channel 1 + 1 belongs. He is an opinion leader in the country.
Kolomoisky’s group dominates Ukraine’s iron market through the private group. He also owned 40
percent of the shares in Ukrtatnafta, which operates a major oil refinery.
‘In this life, one thing counts, in the bank large amounts, I’m afraid these don’t grow on trees, You’ve got to pick-a-pocket or two’.
“Iron and steel pope” reminds me of the Australian Gina Rinehart.
What is your opinion about her?
My father had to interview Rino’s pater, Lang Hancock once. He was warned not to mention Hancock’s former partner, Peter Wright, who Hancock had cheated out of a large sum, and whose family sued the Hancocks for years (reminiscent of Jarndyce and Jarndyce). So, of course, his first question was about the Wright case, at which Hancock spat the dummy and threw him out. Gina ‘Rino’ Rinehart, in my opinion, is a pat straight from Daddy’s fundament. The dung does not fall far from the orifice.
Posting here if I may and if mods think is relevant
Southfront has posted article re Israel meeting Putin…..an interesting point to me is they write is that maybe the visit is timed apart from upcoming Israel election… so Israels influence -allegedly?-over the leading Ukraine candidate for president can be used as a bargaining point for their own benefit re Syria and for possible developments in Donbass that assist them to please Russia and Russia might find beneficial??????
I believe Russia has not announced the agenda for the meeting.
This feudal social in Ukraine will contribute to the country breaking up into three parts. The oligarchs, ie. robber barons, cannot possibly control a population which is continually becoming impoverished. Something will have to break. History proves it.