by Jimmie Moglia for the Saker Blog
Trump’s supporters, having found the vanity of conjecture and inefficacy of expectations, resolved to prove their own existence, if not by violence, at least by physical presence.
They came forth into the crowded capital with an almost juvenile ambition that their numbers would be counted, their voice heard and their presence noticed.
But every upheaval, from Spartacus to the Bastille, is subject to unexpected developments. However peaceful the intents may be, the man involved in a turmoil is forced to act without deliberation, and obliged to choose before he can examine. He is surprised by sudden alterations of the state of things, and changes his measures according to superficial appearances.
Still, the corporate media, whose intestinal refuse is paraded as news, triumphs in every discovery of failure and ignores any evidence of success.
But, revolutionarily speaking, the storming of Washington was a success. And Trump did not expect, inspired or willed the unfortunate deaths.
If and when some reliable evidence will be produced, it will be probably found that parasitic elements, with dubious sponsors and of dubious character, joined the crowd.
This would only surprise the unawareness of the thoughtless. Even in Kiev, the ‘revolutionaries’ included characters who actually shot into the crowd from sundry buildings – as documented, in an intercepted phone call, by a then female president-of-something in the European Union.
Yet, when all is said and done, Washington may prove more eventful than the actual Bastille. For the date of the Bastille’s capture (July 14, 1789), became a French national commemorative event only through a convenient historical post-scriptum.
The punctilious historian may remember that the Bastille, like the Capitol dome in Washington, was visible from all of Paris – a medieval fortress, 100 ft high. At the time of the riot it only held seven prisoners, nor the mob gathered to free them. They wanted the ammunitions stored inside the wall.
When the prison governor refused, the mob charged and killed him. His head was carried round the streets on a spike.
Of the seven liberated prisoners one, a mentally-ill, white-bearded old man was paraded through the streets while he waved at the crowd, four were forgers who disappeared among the rabble, another, also mentally ill, was later re-incarcerated into an asylum. The only nobleman, and potentially an ‘enemy of the people’, was the Count de Soulange, who had been imprisoned at the request of his family for sexual misconduct.
The irony continues. Insensible to its possible historical value, the revolutionaries contracted with an enterprising bourgeois to demolish the tower.
After subduing the revolution Napoleon did not like the suggestive ideological connotations of the Place de la Bastille and thought of building there his ‘Arc de Triomphe’ (the one now in the ‘Etoile’), but that did not prove popular.
Therefore he ordered, instead, to build a huge bronze statue of an imperial elephant. A plaster model, a facsimile of the future finished product was built and inaugurated, but the wars made funding difficult. Waterloo and the Restoration did not help either. The plaster elephant stood in the iconic square from 1814 to 1848 when irreparable decay prompted its demolition.
But I digress.
As for the Washington’s Bastille, the related and subsequent events have openly shown the essentially unlimited power of the swamp, which, Don Quixote-like, Trump said he would attempt to drain.
Most of us know that the UUABLPPTH [Unmentionables Unless Accompanied By Lavish Praise plus their lackeys – hereinafter referred to as the ‘unmentionables’] make up the core of the swamp. I will return to them later, but the massively falsified elections, incontrovertibly show, among other things, how much the unmentionables hate the deplorables – in the instance and probably 60% of the nation.
Generally speaking and under often-recurrent conditions, elections are a rite enabling citizens to believe or continue to pretend that they live in a democracy rather than in an authoritarian regime.
By tradition, the absolute obedience of the population to absurd and incoherent decrees (“Patriot Act” et als.) has repeatedly reassured the masters that whatever they impose, the deplorables will accept.
For example, the Vietnam war protesters of old, plus peace-loving, cultural-marxists and amphetamines-laden youths met with policemen and waved flowers under their nose as an act of rebellion. But the war only ended seven years later. Meanwhile the richer and/or well-heeled dodged the draft, while the poorer didn’t. Besides, that ‘flower-inspired’ rebellion was not aimed at ending the war (or the war would have ended), but at turning upside down universally accepted ethics, and with ethics, perhaps unbeknown to them, the world as we know it.
Nevertheless I don’t think we should single out Americans for blame. Already in 1552, the young Frenchman Etienne de la Boetie wrote his “The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude” to address the central problem of political philosophy, namely the mystery of civil obedience.
Why do people, asked Etienne, in all times and all places obey the commands of the government, which always constitutes a small minority of the society? To him the spectacle of general consent to despotism (or in the recent American case, to fraud) is puzzling and appalling. “All this havoc – says he – descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourself render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling in our cities. He has indeed nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you. Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you, if you do not provide them yourselves?”
Good question, we may say, but the problem remains. It is understandable in general, but only confusedly answerable in detail, due to the infinite intricacies of our individual lives. Therefore, a blanket indictment of the deplorables for letting themselves be driven by the unmentionables is theoretically logical but practically unjustified.
Still, during the Washington’s Bastille and for the first time that I recall, the unmentionables felt some concern for their ass. It is tragic that some of the revolutionaries died, because, as we know, the intent of the rally was peaceful and nothing compared to what was witnessed throughout America in 2020.
The lackeys’ official horror and concern for ‘democracy’ show that there is no vice so simple but assumes some mark of virtue on its outward parts. All that wringing of arms and shows of deprecation are falser than oaths made in wine. For none of the Capitoline lords would answer why they didn’t want to recount the votes. Leading the average deplorable to conclude that there is no more faith in them (as a lot) than in a stewed prune. For their intoxication with themselves will give no way to reason.
Equally, the Washington’s Bastille brought to the attention of many how much the Constitution has sunk under the feet of the unmentionables. Here is but one example – not to repeat what the readers already know, but to show the arrogance associated with the systems of censure the country is subjected to.
After the death of Ms. Ashly Babbit, shot by a policeman, an Internet friend of mine published the following post on his FB account, along with her picture.
“This is Ashly Babbitt. She was shot and killed by law enforcement during a protest in America. No one will take the knee for her. There will be no murals in her honor. The media will not mourn her death. She is white therefore her life does not matter for the establishment.”
FB returned this message,
“Your account has been restricted for 30 days because your post did not follow community standards.”
To comment on FB’s response the author said, “Mourning the death of this woman on Facebook is banned. Yet we have spent many months mourning the death of a drug addict, a criminal, an abuser, a man who broke into a woman’s home and put a gun to her stomach in order to extort money out of her. We have been paying our respect to this man all over the world for the best part of last year. And this woman who proudly served her country, she is now dead and you cannot even pay your respects to her own social media.”
The restraint and politeness of the censored statement are beyond question. And its censuring should make us pause. For it shows the scorn of the enemy for the rest of us. A scorn that should include the concurrent barrage of nauseating platitudes and the unrestrained bubbling to the surface of a diabolical hatred, no-longer disguised but steeped deep in history.
The Internet is yesterday’s telephone and Zion did not invent the Internet, nor computers, computing and communication software. Yet, the communication engines and components, companies and operations, Google, Twitter, Facebook and Youtube are owned and controlled by the unmentionables.
From his soul in hell, Coudenhove-Kalergi must be laughing his head off. His predicted new world, made up of ancient-Egyptians-looking deplorables lorded over by the unmentionables, cannot any longer be branded as a conspiracy theory. Under our own eyes there is the shape of things to come at large.
For he who controls speech controls opinion. Opinion molds thought and thought drives action. Therefore monopoly of opinion leads to control of action, and action includes just about every aspect of life and liberty.
Besides, free speech is ultimately vital to being human. It is the most important aspect of everything we refer to as freedom. Lack of freedom is the triumph of tyranny. And the train of tyranny drags in tow injustice, repression, murder, corruption, unjust and unnecessary wars.
Even earlier and more primitive media, newspapers and radio, controlled by a few, were the engines of persuasion and coercion to drive millions into quasi-genocidal world wars.
As an aside and in this respect, Germans owe a debt of historical gratitude to the Soviet Union. For it was fear of the Soviets that prevented the implementation of the “Morgentau Plan”, already signed by Roosevelt and Churchill, to be carried out after the end of WW2 – a plan that included the sterilization of all Germans. Disbelievers may wish to consult the details of the plan, as well as the book, “Germany Must Perish” printed in the US during the war.
Restricting free speech is necessary in every war and every tyranny. And we can identify tyranny by how much freedom of speech we have and by how much we can criticize the rulers. For reason and truth can outweigh lies and corruption. But massive suppression and an avalanche of lies and propaganda can make a mockery of factual truth and stuff the ears of men with false reports. Many, sick of show and weary of noise, turn off the set, how many we know not.
In this respect, technology and the power of global corporations to corrupt the minds have never been more powerful and ominous, in all history.
Furthermore, media of all types can now control feelings as well as the more primitive emotional parts of the brain. Never has government been bigger and more able to repress freedom with an infrastructure that includes the FBI, CIA, NSA and their counterparts in individual states and nations.
Never past tyrants better controlled their subjects than the globalists today. The threat to the freedom of the western peoples of the world is the greatest threat to their existence. Suppression of freedom of speech is exampled in the attitude of a controlled media, which is totally against the common feelings of the majority.
Most peoples of the world and nations want to preserve their nationality, country, customs, habits, religion and way of life. None of the corporate channels reflect these beliefs and objectives.
The axis of movies, Zionist Hollywood, ever since the abolition of the “Motion Pictures Production Code” act (1954), has been an extremely powerful engine of persuasion and shaper of belief, custom, habits and action, as well as an inculcator of hatred, let alone depravity. For reference read this article [ https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/01/14/the-jewish-role-in-promoting-cannabis-and-why-its-bad-for-you/ ]
The sum of these forces led to the US summer of 2020. Which was not a summer of discontent, but an extended season of Hollywood and media-inspired hatred. And mass hatred, as opposed to individual hatred, is an organized phenomenon.
The current biggest shapers of thought and human action are the networks of social media, primary tools for sharing ideas and learning things.
Owning and controlling these organizations are a few people, whose ethnic affiliation is undisputed and unmentionable. They can decide what the world can see, say, hear and consequently think.
Dismissing the reality and the consequences of this ideological monopoly as a ‘conspiracy theory’ is an insult to the minds of millions.
The conspiratorial element of a theory depends on identifiable circumstances and hypotheses. Even historically sanctified characters such as president Franklin Roosevelt stated as follows,
“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way…” The point is that many of the major world events that shape our destinies occur because there is a plan behind them.”
In the same line of thought, if we were merely dealing with the law of averages, half of the events affecting a nation’s well-being should be good for that nation. If it were just a matter of incompetence, the leaders should occasionally make a mistake in favor of the deplorables. Instead it is planning and foresight that form the shape of things to come at large.
Not that chance is necessarily ruled out. According to his biographers, even Hitler firmly believed in grasping at fleeting opportunities. In a speech or lecture to his adjutants given in 1938 he said, “There is but one moment when the goddess of fortune wafts by, and if you don’t grab her then by the hem you won’t to get a second chance.”
The quote came to mind in thinking about the disparagers who have compared Trump with Hitler. Stupidity is sometimes invincible but, probably unbeknown to his detractors, Trump as a president, shared some characteristics associated with leaders who reach power outside the canonical paths – canonical paths that often include corruption, opportunistic servitude and/or crime.
For one, by all appearances Trump had far less authority on his advisers and subordinates than what we think a president has – an authority that seemingly weakened with each passing year. Also, a characteristic of heads of state who over-rely on advisers is a conscious desire ‘not to know.’ Even if they are later deemed directly responsible for what happened.
It is total speculation but the assassination of the Iranian General Suleimani may be one such instance. Though in other cases the reverse is true. The opening towards Kim Yong Sun of North Korea fits with Trump’s general style.
On the other hand, the policy towards Venezuela, though justified imperialistically, does not fit the profile. The ‘self-proclaimed’ Guaido’ is a puppet worthy of a Simpsons cartoon. Based on what I know of the country (readers may also consult my article “Don’t Cry for Me Venezuela”), the regime is anything but what described by the unmentionable media. The tight economic sanctions, the equivalent of a war, the arbitrary freezing of Venezuela’s gold reserves in London, the theft of CITGO, (the Venezuelan oil company operating in the US), the placing a bounty of 15 million $ on the head of Maduro, the many failed coups d’etat – quite open in planning and gross in execution – do not seem consistent with Trump’s character, at least as displayed in his general demeanor and other occasions.
Incidentally, the two ‘ambassadors’ of the Guaido’ puppet, in the US and Britain, are unmentionables. And there is an extant recording of the UK ‘ambassador’ Newman where she discusses assigning the Esequibo mineral-rich area – disputed between Venezuela with Guyana since the early 1800 – to an Exxon consortium of sorts.
Besides, in my view and independently of ideological convictions, in oratory, consistence, intelligence and demeanor Maduro towers over all former and latter members of the Trump administration put together. A remarkable achievement, I think, for someone who started as a bus driver and union leader to become the president of Venezuela. And although I cannot, of course, verify its accuracy, there is information among some Venezuelan sources that Trump expressed a secret admiration for Maduro.
To conclude, most records of history are but narratives of successive villainies, treasons and usurpations, massacres and wars – of which professional historians explain causes and effects.
As a non professional historian but a rude mechanical who earns his bread upon the Athenian walls I offer here an extremely arbitrary theory. On the ground that, just as a right line describes the shortest passage from point to point, a plausible historical explanation is that which connects distant truths by the shortest of intermediate propositions.
Therefore I select few key events – constituting an arbitrary beginning and its connecting causal links to the present. In the instance, fractional banking, 1968, Reagan and the Washington Bastille.
Fractional banking is a generally familiar idea whose implications, I think, are not sufficiently realized due to the apparently neutral effect of the term ‘fractional’. Risking the contempt of professionals and economists I will reduce the notion to its core with an example.
A bank that owns, says, 10 k$ in gold can loan out 100 k$ in money that does not exist – at say, 10% yearly interest.
After one year, globally, the borrowers return 110 k$ to the bank, (loans plus interest). Of the globally returned 110 k$, 100k$ are the money that did not exist, but the 10 k$ paid as interest correspond to the labor expended by the borrowers.
Let’s for a moment overlook where the borrowers got the additional 10k$ from, because for the purpose of this demonstration, the point is not important.
The bottom line is that with an investment of 10 kS of actual money (gold for example) the banker realizes an interest of a real 10k$ or 100%. Now with 20 k$ of actual money he can lend out 200k$ of non-existing money and so on.
It follows that the bank’s wealth increases exponentially. Consequently, sooner or later, the bank or banking system will essentially own and control – directly and indirectly – everything that has a demonstrable commercial value.
Fractional banking became the operating system of the first modern capitalism only at the end of the 17th century, with the establishment of the Bank of England. Which, unknown to many, was a private bank that lent money to the crown for conducting business and waging wars. Money paid back from the taxes on citizens.
The system is so brilliant in its simplicity that we must wonder why was it not applied centuries before.
And here we meet again with the unmentionables. Christianity, as well as Islam for that matter, considered interest usury and usury a sin.
The philosophical tricks by which Christian rulers tried to skirt the issue are ingenious and often amusing. Suffice to say, with a gross generalization, that it was found more expedient to let the unmentionables handle the matter. From thereon begin their path to unstoppable power.
As for 1968 – the second selected event – there took place a brilliant ideological operation, and again I generalize for simplicity. For the 1968 ‘revolution’ launched the ideology aimed at the deconstruction and destruction of the family, customs, traditions and gender distinctions. Destruction leading eventually to the assault on nationalities and ethnicities.
That destruction is in progress. I suspect without proof that the unmentionables’ hatred for Trump stems from his effort, however feeble, to mount an opposition. Opposition to a new world order where humans become merchantable individual atoms, drifting on the smooth world plane of exchangeable merchandise.
As for Reagan, with his background as a Coca-Cola cowboy, he was the perfect president for cutting the taxes of the rich, under the now all-but-forgotten theory of ‘trickle-down economics.’ Perhaps a thinly-disguised reference to the parable of the rich Epulon, from whose table fell the crumbs for the starving deplorables of the time.
From then on and on a planetary scale the already exorbitant assets of the overclass, began to increase immeasurably. And deregulation triggered a race to the concentration of capital and activities. Resulting in the stratospheric wealth of the few, with which they can buy everybody and everything, and become a dominant power over the traditional states, as even the events of the last few weeks unquestionably prove.
Remember Reagan’s, “The state is not the solution of problems, the state is the problem”. And now the state, the law and even health (e.g. Covid) are turning into a mockery of themselves.
In the end and in my view, the Washington’s Bastille was but the externation of long repressed and related feelings of helplessness.
To those who cannot but feel nauseated by the means used to impose the current presidential ticket on the rest of us, I will quote the answer, attributed to the wife of a Turkish diplomat at the court of King Lois XV. A courtier was asking her what happiness consisted in. “My lord – she replied – our happiness depends on the circulation of the blood.” [… ma foi, Monsieur, notre bonheur depend de la facon que notre sang circule.]
The others may reflect that, after all, man is little more than an instrument in an orchestra directed by the muse of history.
“Ashli” is an operative, and her story is theater. Her “killer” is a militant, immigrant, BLM supporter. As well as a Capitol cop. They really do lay it on thick. Are they angling for a 70’s Chile style rightist putsch?
It certainly would seem so…
Do you have a link to this, so we can verify it ? …
Many thanks to Jimmie Moglia for pointing to the elephant in the room. I’ve been wondering when someone would explicitate the implicit, and openly mention the role of the unmentionables in the already well advanced destruction of the Western world.
RMM
The unmentionables began their imperial offensive back in 1066, when they financed Duke Williams invasion of England. To the Khazars, Britain was of paramount importance, as they needed an island fortress for imperial policies. Today we have the City of London, an independent banking country run by the Rothschild’s.
B’T Selem, Israeli’s human rights outfit, has (finally) relased a report denouncing the Israeli state as an apartheid state. Norm Finkelstein notes that it should be described as a Jewish supremacist state rather than an apartheid state. But conveniently, there is white supremacism to distract the Social Justice (except for Palestinians) Warriors.
https://mondoweiss.net/2021/01/the-jewish-supremacist-state-a-comment-on-btselems-apartheid-regime-designation-for-israel/
But, other than that, things are just fine, right, Jimmie?
Fantastic article!
Ishkabibble
Yes, an excellent article. However, there is one point with which I disagree:
“Trump’s supporters, having found the vanity of conjecture and inefficacy of expectations, resolved to prove their own existence, if not by violence, at least by physical presence.
They came forth into the crowded capital with an almost juvenile ambition that their numbers would be counted, their voice heard and their presence noticed”.
Well, they did come forward and they succeeded in having their numbers counted. As one neocon commentator has admitted, removing Trump was successful, but it will not be easy eradicating the Trumpist Movement. The reason this is so is because the Trumpist Movement was also a populist movement, ordinary Americans reacting against the policies of the elite.
Biden will on January 20 become President. However, from the psychological point of view, he will have more opponents than supporters and his authority in the country will be limited, when most people know he stole the elections. Should the economic and financial situation in the US deteriorate, then he can expect severe political and social repercussions, and we shall see if he can handle them.
there are non more enslaved than those who consider themselves free and brave.,most properly acute symptom of excetionalism.
To judge the condition of a patient (society) it is often valuable to look at the condition of the ‘arts’ in that society. For some years the US dominated in many areas. Now, not so much. This assesment is similar to taking the pulse of a sick patient.
Creative arts in the US empire is dead. Painting became applying paint to a canvas without learning to paint like playing the piano without learning music or ballet without learning to dance or a blind man constructing a brick wall and politics without philosophy or logic.
Originally photography democratised painting. We could all view paintings without viewing the original. All could afford a photograph of a wedding. So today why do old realistic paintings fetch such high prices while photographs and ‘modern art’ are getting cheaper? When I produce montages I use old paintings as the base. Why do old realistic paintings fetch such high prices? Photographs and ‘modern art’ are getting cheaper.Today computer programs can colorize a black and white photograph. If Rembrant were alive today and can also do this task. Which would you prefer?
Baudelaire described photography as the “refuge of failed painters with too little talent”. In his view, art was derived from imagination, judgment and feeling but photography was mere reproduction which cheapened the products of the beautiful.
It seems today that the ‘arts’ and its assesment of beauty in the US is on life-support… as is society.
https://youtu.be/m7792DUCIho
Monsieur de la Boetie was not, presumably, very familiar with the Prisoner’s Dilemma. That conundrum applies with at least equal force to politics as to imprisonment.
As de la Boetie and Hume observed, the mass of citizens could not be subdued by a small number of despotic rulers unless the citizens gave their consent.
Yes and no. It is enough for the triumph of evil for good people to do nothing; and silence, in this context, amounts to consent. The great majority consider the risks of disobedience too great – as indeed they are for any individual, or for any but a large minority. But the worm in the bud consists of those enterprising individuals who are more than willing to side with the rulers for the sake of money and power – or perhaps even the hope of them.
The existence of those who care nothing for others or for the national interest, but only for enriching themselves and gaining power, hamstrings anyone who wishes to resist. They are like enemy enclaves from which sharpshooters may emerge to shoot rebels in the back, and to inform on them to the authorities. Moreover, computers, networking and miniaturisation give governments much greater powers of observation.
In this respect the USA, the UK, and the rest of the West are rapidly becoming more like East Germany than like the free-ish West of the 1950s and 1960s.
It is time for people everywhere to start naming these ‘untmentionables’. If we don’t know who the enemy is, how can it be defeated? Everything we read, see or hear has gone through a zionist filter first. We are only allowed to read about the symptoms, never the root of the evil we see around us.
If you see or hear about someone who’s ever been accused of anti-semitism, read it again for this simply means they’ve had something important to say.
Jewish companies own the great majority of the media and the moneylending, not only in the US and Europe, but world wide.
“Interest on debts grows without rain.”-Yiddish Proverb
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/03/06/jews-and-moneylending-a-contemporary-case-file-part-1-of-3/
Highly recommended:
Goy guide to World History;
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VMZsq9HgopN5/
@Tom Welsh
…becoming more like East Germany…naah,
to quote the author; “the greatest part of mankind has no other reason for their opinion than they are in fashion”
https://www.yourdailyshakespeare.com/2019/11/18/questionable-anniversaries-the-fall-of-the-berlin-wall/
I see it the same way
Everybody is extremely afraid to name gods chosen people from Zion
Let’s hope humanity will tackle this problem as it is a real great danger for all humanity and its utter existence
”In this respect the USA, the UK, and the rest of the West are rapidly becoming more like East Germany than like the free-ish West of the 1950s and 1960s.”
Well, not exactly. The GDR was an egalitarian, prosperous, industrialized country with a fantastic system of public healthcare and ditto education. By the early 1980s, her living standards had surpassed that of Britain. I can’t see how the rotting neoliberal West with its deindustrialization and trashing of public health and education is becoming ”like the GDR”. Fairy-tales about the dreaded Stasi are what keep up the West’s reputation as ”free-ish”. The GDR had to deal with the constant subversion and espionage activities of NATO, especially its hub in West Berlin. It was the treasonous scum Gorbachov who proved too much for the GDR.
Thank you for this:
‘Well, not exactly. The GDR was an egalitarian, prosperous, industrialized country with a fantastic system of public healthcare and ditto education. By the early 1980s, her living standards had surpassed that of Britain. I can’t see how the rotting neoliberal West with its deindustrialization and trashing of public health and education is becoming ”like the GDR”. Fairy-tales about the dreaded Stasi are what keep up the West’s reputation as ”free-ish”. The GDR had to deal with the constant subversion and espionage activities of NATO.’
I find exactly the same’ damnatio memoriae’ method is used against Yugoslavia, my homeland, here in the little rump destroyed colony of Croatia, and in ‘so called western world’.
So much lies to go through to discover the truth.
As GDR, Yugoslavia also had to deal with constant attacks from outside enemies, terrorist attacks, enemies within.
I remember as a very young child in school in late 60ties, early 70ties, being severely warned by my mother not to pick up anything from the street on a way to school, such as colorful pens, toys et similar ( maybe explosives).
Terrorist infiltration, and attempts to destroy the country. By the ustashe and other bastards…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugojno_group
@azra, my Da (10 at the time) told me that when he was a kid, the Germans had bombed Belfast, the next day while out with his brother they walked past all manner of destruction; the milk man’s horse, dead, hanging off the edge of a bridge, no sign of the milkman or his cart. As they passed a destroyed store he said the street was littered with pens and crayons, gold to a kid. Reaching down he scooped up a handful, the next thing his older brother cuffed him hard on the back of the head and made him drop the crayons, “might be fake, could be explosives” was all he said. Your mother lived through WW2, yes….she knew a thing or two about war.
Cheers, M
POETIC 🙏
जो कुछ हुआ
वो कैसे हुआ जानता हूँ मैं
जो कुछ नहीं हुआ
वो बता क्यूँ नहीं हुआ
– इरफ़ान सिद्दीक़ी
Tr.
That which happened
how it happened, we understand
But what didn’t happen
could someone explain
– Irfan Siddiqui
The King James version of the Bible, 1 Corinthians Chap 13 verse 12 states :
“For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.”
Thank you Mr. Moglia, for pointing out the crucial role of fractional reserve banking. If this fact was widely known, history would have not come this far.
I also agree with you, that without the Soviet threat, a plan like the Morgenthau plan would possibly have
been adopted. Unfortunately German conservatives continue enjoying their various delusions, they are truly hopeless.
On a sidenote, your remarks concerning Coudenhove-Kalergi are spot on:
His main work “Praktischer Idealismus” never was translated into English, – I am pretty sure, – so as to not rouse the wider public. A while ago I attempted to translate it into English, and in doing so after less then 30 % of the text was so affected by the obvious racism and what I can only call a monstrous “exceptionalism” exuded by it, that I eventually put it aside in disgust. I am no clinical psychiatrist but to me the author`s mindset is a cultured form of homophobia posturing as the class consciousness of a class of self-perceived superhumans.
Your connecting of the dots between banking, 1968, Reagan and today`s events is priceless in its lucidity!
To those who point out the sad fact that as long as we do nothing, they win, I want to say this:
As they continue to turn most of us into transhuman slaves, we, even the weakest and timid ones, – will with time, – through the disgust at what we have become-, discover that we are humans: For God has created man in his own image. He cannot allow us to forget that. And that will be the end of this evil order we are facing today.
But it will take some time.
Gregor,
The book is available as a paperback on Google Books and Amazon
People are Reading Culture of Critique.
https://archive.org/details/thecultureofcritiquekevinmacdonald1998_201912
A small question from “For it was fear of the Soviets that prevented the implementation of the “Morgentau (sic) Plan”, already signed by Roosevelt and Churchill, to be carried out after the end of WW2 – a plan that included the sterilization of all Germans. Disbelievers may wish to consult the details of the plan, as well as the book, “Germany Must Perish” printed in the US during the war.”
The Morgenthau Plan text I looked at did not mention the sterilization of all Germans, although slow starvation seems an initial likely result of the first draft.
The “Germany Must Perish!” book was written by Theodore N. Kaufman (United States Secretary of the Treasury) not Henry Morgenthau, and it is this simplistic and racist book written in 1941 that proposed sterilization of Germans.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Ooops, misplaced parentheses: Henry Morgenthau was the United States Secretary of the Treasury.
Apologies!
I can’t say whether you’re right or wrong on the last part, but one thing I can’t help but add is that Joseph Stalin wanted a reunited Germany, unlike the other Allies, and was even against the Morgenthau Plan from the get go. I never saw Stalin the same way again ever since – what I used to think was a tyrant/murderer actually had some decency in him.
Conjecture,
Perhaps you read an expurgated edition:
“The book (Germany Must Perish!) advocated genocide through the sterilization of all Germans and the territorial dismemberment of Germany, believing that this would achieve world peace.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany_Must_Perish!
“Zion did not invent the Internet, nor computers, computing and communication software”
Wrong. Fatally wrong.
Provided that the article and the role of “unmentionables” are correct, how could anyone expect that Trump was going to change anything? Rather than being a part of the “plan”?
Obviously, Trump is not a part of the plan discussed here.
From France. Dear Mr. Moglia, it is always a pleasure to read you, because you say things so true and say them in such a fine and clear language.
I like your expression “the unmentionables” (as opposed to the “deplorables”).
Regarding the Bastille, you say : “When the prison governor refused, the mob charged and killed him. His head was carried round the streets on a spike”. In my remembrance of history books, the prison governor negotiated with the mob the safety of the garrison and, once the mob had entered the Bastille, they killed the soldiers, beheaded the governor and carried his head round the streets on a spike.
As for 1968, do you speak of 1968 student unrest in the USA, or of the color revolution of May 1968 in France? (Anyway, it is more or less the same. The 1960s’ decade is the Great Divide of the Western world, where everything in the social and moral structures of the West was changed). In the May 1968 false revolution in France, bearded students and half-naked girls shouted slogans, threw stones, smoked drugs and had intercourse until the movement eventually went exhausted by itself. But it had been so contrary to the sense of decency of most of the French population that a street demonstration was called afterwards and attended by a huge crowd on the Champs-Elysées in Paris (the figure of one million was quoted)… and then what?… and then nothing ! The new government included ministers who had a soft spot for the Radicals, most of the Radicals demands were put into effect… and the Champs-Elysées demonstrators (and the immense majority of the French people) were beautifully conned. Of course, since May 1968, France has been the leading country in the moral decay of the Western countries.
Another point when speaking of the impotence of the crowds. The government of colonels in Greece : it was a right-wing, nationalist government, therefore not loved by the World Establishment. After it was defeated by the Turks, the colonels’ government disappeared. Same thing in Argentina, after it was defeated by the British, the right-wing, nationalist colonels’ government, not loved by the World Establishment, disappeared. Now, take the Pashinian government in Armenia, a government sold out to the West and therefore loved by the World Establishment. After it has been shamefully defeated by the Azeris, and after some street demonstrations… it is still in place ! Quod erat demonstrandum.
Thank you for your comments. I found three different versions regarding the storming of the Bastille. All published by official sources, and probably there are more. In such cases I hope the reader will consider the context, the end results and the symbolic/historical importance of the event as a whole, and forgive the involuntary inaccuracy in the (however important) details. There are several monumental histories of the French Revolution, all fascinating. If I could have 3 lives I would dedicate one to read them all. But I appreciate the correction.
Dear Mr. Moglia,
Though the internet is fine with me as a source of info for the culture plebeians, I also understand the possibilities of the obfuscation, I somehow am reverting to the hard covered books of the history ( even there, I am suspicious and questioning what I read). These were written after the ww2, encyclopedias I treasure.
But, there are examples of burning books in our history, latest I know about is the massive burning of the books in ex Yugoslavia, here in Croatia in 90ties they have burned thousands of the books in Serbian language. Some were so precious, so much work for the good of all of us.
I was not there at the moment when evil civil war was imposed on the country- I was in MEast.
Coming back, I was shocked at the manipulation of the language, purged to became servant-like and distorted in ugliness.
‘ Well meaning servants’ were warning me how to speak, in order not to get into trouble with the ‘free Croatia’.
I never respected and I never complied
My parents were sweet intellectuals, an engineer who designed power plants, my mother a professor, hundreds and hundreds of books we had in our home, what a pleasure, I started to read at 4 years old.
I want to tell you that Internet, as free it is, is also a chimera…But you know it.
I wonder if you use ‘old books’, the ones done with effort… I have many of these, and I hope you have too.
This is not said to demean you at all, I enjoy your studious articles written elegantly.
Thank you.
Perhaps a more pertinent question is this: ‘why are profit-driven corporations the solution to the ‘problem’?’
There are many things a society can or cannot be, but one thing it cannot be is an entity without interdependencies, mutual obligations and a social contract for daily engagement and resolution of dispute.
Note that everything there is the opposite of atomisation. It is not about breaking everything asunder, it is about holding it all together.
There is no law saying that children should look after their elderly parents, but it is indisputable amongst stable societies that there is an unspoken social contract that they should be intimately involved in the repayment of a societal debt concerning their own upbringing.
Just as there is no law saying that sunlight is owned by no-one but benefits everyone. In this age of Gatesisms, I am strongly of the opinion that just such a law needs to exist.
The Native Americans may not have been so sophisticated when it came to gun making, but they did understand the commons one hell of a lot better than rampaging European exports. ‘How can you sell the air?’ is all you need to read to understand that….
What is being taken for granted is that individualism trumps mutuality.
Why should that still be taken for granted?
The following scenario:
Aggressions raising, they are incited from all sides. The situation will explode. The army will take measures and brings the situation under control. People are demoralized, hurt, hungry, lost all their money and jobs. The FED introduces virtual money, it will be promoted as a step to save the people. With virtual money (Better than Cash) and the total surveillance by Big Tech (ID2020, Known Traveller etc.) people are finally under total control. There will be no more Snowden, no more Assange, no more Saker, no more criticism. The Digital-Financial-Military-Complex knows all about you, and will not allow you taking any step it doesn’t want you to take. It takes them a second to freeze all your money, limit your movement, curb your speech. Any offer of peace from them is a poisoned chalice. If this top/down/revolution cannot be prevented now, it will never again give the opportunity for any.
What you say is very true. But, still, in my opinion, you are not pessimistic enough : things still more hellish will be performed on the peoples.
I sure like the term “Unmentionable”.
Such a bunch of funny, and sick, names behind the term. And the ongoing need to change names.
I like these two best.
Nudelman aka Kagan aka Nuland. This refers, of course, to the previous Foreign Minister of Israel, uups, USA. She has a merit of starting the Civil War in Ukraine. Standard “War by deception.” I find it interesting and telling that the name of father and husband are thrown away like that. Is the name of the father something to be ashamed of? I guess so. Husbands name has also a familiar ring to people who have read about the mass murder of White People in the Bolshevik Utopia. So, yes, there is a logic.
Second is Swedish media kaiser, Bonnier aka GoodChild Hirschels. Why not Richer? Bester? Goldier? Stonier? Well, who knows…
Just a personal note, and not very polished, but I think there is some justice in nature. Most of these name changing witches actually look like witches, and being still only at middle age. There seems to grow a face like a witch, which is never happy, always worried, always greedy for more, still more.
Somewhere, deep down, there, somewhere, they must know that they are not liked, not at all, no matter, which name they choose. It must be hard, sometimes, that you know that they like you only because they are either afraid, or because they expect more money. But there you are, you win money, but not love, for love you must be human, not just gold…
JM, great article written with wit and erudition both utterly missing from all mainstream publications. Overall, you understand the situation. A couple of bones to pick: 1) the Reagan Revolution was distinctly bipartisan due to the fact the DNC, in 1978, decided to seek funding from the corporations and the rich as the first order of business; 2) the student rebellions in the US was dramatically different from that in France–American students had grown up with endless messages about “freedom” and all our moral crusade to bring dignity and justice to the entire world so that those of us who read books became morally outraged with the political establishment that appeared to mock those values. 1968 for us was the year the government shut down the evolving coalition on the left with the government’s brutal murders of MLK and RFK within a few weeks of each other and, of course, with the brutal police riot at the DP convention. The rest was a mopping up operation by COINTELPRO. In contrast the French movement was much more ideological.
Trump’s presidency and the 2020 Trump presidency supporters can be best summed up by Shakspeare.
“It was a tale told by an idiot full of sound and fury signifying nothing.”
They say that if you don’t stand for something, you will fall for anything, and the Trump presidency stood for nothing. His presidency was antirely devoid of substance. Trump was a corrupt self serving tryrant.
The individuals that supported Trump were in the police state / sureveillance state, Wall Street firms and investors, the medical mafia, and the fracking industry. That is where all of the gains of the Trump presidency would up. They were not even actual gains. Those were the individuals and institutions that not only did not earn their rewards, but demanded that lock downs were ordered to prohibit any populist uprising after the fraud of Trumponomics descended into oblivion and insolvency.
The fracking industry would not permit Trump to ally with Russia. It was against their self-interests. That is why Trump would not do it. It was not because of the FBI or the DNC, even though they oppose Russia but only on superficial terms after the election of Trump.
The Russian government was the largest donor to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton signed the Plutonium Disposession Agreement with Sergey Lavrov. This was all in the national media. Then suddenly Hillary Clinton started blaming Russian hackers for stealing the election in the most ridiculous lie ever told in Amerixan history after the FBI asked her to sign a statement of that nature.
Maybe Trump initially intended to ally with Russia, but a large percentage of his base was the fracking industry and he could not lose his base because the majority of his policies did not help the majority of Americans.
The FBI and police organized the event. The FBI was cultivating QShahman as a Manchurian candidate and was working with him, as they typically have done with domestic terrorists, which qualifies them for being terrorists guilty of high crimes and treason. This is not an isolated incident with the FBI. It is a pattern of behavior. Epstein and Maxwell are another example of the high drimes and treason that they perpetrate. They have no moral compass at all. Absolutely none! The evdence cannot be disputed.
The only differnce between The Order of None Angels and InfraGard is in name only. They resort to the same techniques and practices. They are evil monsters. Their life styles are sick and disgusting crimes against humanity.
Andrea Iravani
I enjoyed reading this fine article !
But something steals through at times, like pessimism, as here, “For he who controls speech controls opinion.” And here, ” after all, man is little more than an instrument in an orchestra directed by the muse of history.
For the latter, I always wait and hope for the muse of direct, human inspired history, and that I believe is not only possible, but the true retelling of events. Then the shortest distance between two points that defines a line, in relation to history, will not necessarily need brilliant mental gymnastics to explain. . .
This “insurrection” was another clamp to fix the cover on the boiling vessel. (False flag)
The fire under the vessel was ignited by Reagan and his chicago gang. (“Take from the needy, give to the greedy”)
Trump was a valve.
The delusion is, that the resulting pression can be directed against external enemies. Doesn’t work any more, the power base is missing.
The 0.001 % are ready to arrange with China, while the people wears out in internal conflicts.
Oops. To be clear: I speak of the storm on the capitol. The croud outside is another story. A glimpse of the internal conflicts to come…
The Democrats filed impeachment papers on Trump immediately after first responders, architects, engineers, and pilots went to the Capitol on 9/11 demanding to re-open the investigation. We will probably going through perpetual impeachments for the next 30 years for smoke and mirrors psy-ops. BLM rioting took over the country when the alternative media realized that this was a scamdemic. These tactics are what the surveillance state considers intelligence, which proves that they are incapable of doing anything intelligent, since they do not even know the definition of the word. They think that it means the ability to lie, deceive, and manipulate. They spend their entire lives in a bullshit tornado of their making. There is no hope for this country. You can’t revive a rotting corpse. The country decayed from within long ago. It is now nothing but a banana republic of lawless zombified monsters. Trump is equally as guilty now.
Andrea Iravani
“There is no hope for this country. … It is now nothing but a banana republic of lawless zombified monsters.”
Don’t bury it yet. Hard times frequently bring out the best in individuals as well as societies. The US still has plenty of good people, and we may find that enough of these are courageous enough to stand up and fight for the soul of the nation.
Help them with prayers. Quit the lamentations and the curses. No nation is composed of only “lawless zombified monsters.”
I will believe it when I see it. When the evil sadistic, serial criminal psychopaths have been convicted, and imprisoned fror their sick, evil, sadistic crimes against humanity, including those that have perpetrated the sadistic crimes against me. Until that happens, I have no reason to believe you. I will not place my faith in people. I will not subject myself to the delusions of false hope. The majority of people in this counyry are thoroughly corrupt monsters. Take a look at what is taking place and how many are supporting the po,icies of crimes against humanity. It is systemic corruption. I know that for an absolute fact. There is no hope when there is systemic corruption and systemic indifference to it. These sick, evil, sadistic, monsters not only demand a life without consequences for their sadidtic crimes against humanity, they demand a life in which they benefit from their saidistic crimes against humanity!
Andrea Iravani
@Andrea, I can sort of see where your arguments come from, but let me say couple or more things.
1. While, yes the USofA is a lawless corrupt country, who do you suppose is going to do the judging? The judges all belong to the same club.
2. Let me go back to couple of events that stay in my mind:
Firstly: Solon a famous law maker was sentenced and imprisoned for some financial problems at the age of 82? If I remember correctly. He was released after his son paid the money he was accused of owing the City of Athens.
Secondly: Themistocles, famous navarchos (admiral of Greek Fleet) who was in the war against Persians from the time of Thermopylae (working closely with king Leonidas), who destroyed Persian Fleet in the narrows of Salamina. He was accused by the corrupt Athenians of treason and banished from Athens. Guess what? He allegedly spend his final years in Persia. Let me remind you that Persian kings were Greeks regardless of the popular misconception (they belonged to the house of Achaemenides, and the previous king Cyrus belonged to another Greek house (sorry I can’t remember the name).
My point is: Isn’t it why the Goddess of Justice is blind folded? Her statues can be seen in Washington and other places.