The summits of organizations in which Russia plays a significant role, such as the SCO, CSTO, and BRICS, have recently come to an end. Traditionally, international security is an important topic on their agenda. Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Nikolai Patrushev spoke in more detail about this in an interview with AIF.
Vitaly Tseplyaev, АиФ.ru: – Nikolai Platonovich, the abbreviations BRICS, SCO, and CSTO don’t mean much to most readers. Could you tell me what is the real contribution of these structures?: do they contribute to maintaining peace and stability?
Nikolai Patrushev: – The role of these organizations in the modern world is growing. This is an objective trend. For example, BRICS accounts for more than 40% of the world’s population, 25% of global GDP, and 22% of global trade turnover. Based on purchasing power parity, for example, the BRICS have already surpassed the Group of Seven in terms of gross domestic product: 33% versus 30%.
Making friends against someone is not our principle.
— Nikolai Patrushev
Within the framework of the SCO, BRICS and CSTO, practical steps are being taken to strengthen global stability, regional security, trade and economic ties. We cooperate on an ongoing basis in the fight against terrorism, transnational crime, drug production and distribution, illegal migration, piracy, and the use of information and communication technologies for criminal purposes. And in the context of the ongoing pandemic, we are paying attention to the joint fight against the spread of infections.
I will not list all the areas in which our countries work together. It is important that these actions are aimed at the benefit of all people. Making friends against someone is not our principle.
— At the summits, special attention is paid to the latest developments in Afghanistan. Do you have the feeling that by withdrawing from this country, the Americans simply shifted responsibility to Russia and its regional partners?
— Indeed, the irresponsible withdrawal of American troops has led to the fact that the states of the region have to face increasing problems that the Westerners have not only not solved, but also aggravated. Under these conditions, the SCO and CSTO countries become the main guarantors of stability in Central Asia. In fact, Afghanistan has become a litmus test, once again confirming that Washington has no friends in the world, but only its own selfish interests. After spending trillions of dollars on military operations, the United States and its allies have left chaos and destruction in their wake everywhere. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, now Ukraine, and even earlier Yugoslavia, dozens of Asian, African, and Latin American states are all examples of the destructive American strategy of global dominance.
For Washington, there are no friends in the world, but only its own selfish interests. After spending trillions of dollars on military operations, the United States and its allies have left chaos and destruction in their wake everywhere.
Where Washington cannot achieve its goals through open military intervention, it aggressively intervenes in the internal affairs of sovereign States. Washington is trying to isolate undesirable countries from the outside world, cut off even from the supply of basic means of survival. Look at Venezuela or, for example, Cuba, where the situation escalated this summer. Planes carrying food, medicine, and medical equipment flew from Moscow to Havana almost immediately. From Washington, there were calls for Cubans to take to the streets and overthrow the legitimate government. This is American-style democracy.
But in each of its next bills, Washington cynically calls Russia, China, Iran and a number of other states “bad” countries, violators of order, revanchists, malicious players.
— Apparently, according to American lawmakers, only the United States can be a “good” country.
— It is the United States that is the main instigator of disorder in the world. Moreover, each successive geopolitical experiment of Washington not only affects a single state and its people, but also sets off a chain reaction that destabilizes entire regions, including the West itself.
After the American fiasco in Afghanistan, conditions are forming for a new migration crisis, even more severe than in 2015. Then, from the countries of the Middle East and North Africa destroyed by the Americans and Europeans, so many refugees poured across the Mediterranean Sea that no one can still count them.
I believe that the United States and its allies should bear responsibility for the destruction of the economies of sovereign states, the aggravation of interethnic and political problems, and the activation of terrorist, extremist and other threats. This includes providing compensation that significantly exceeds the multi-trillion dollars they spent on undermining stability around the world.
— The Afghan crisis has become an occasion for the G7 to recognize the role of Russia and China in solving global and regional problems. Do you think that the Big Seven can once again become the “Eight”, or even the “Nine”?
— The G7 countries, with their proposal to involve China and Russia in solving security issues in Central Asia, confirmed the fact that this association is only a discussion club. Moreover, discussions there are conducted under the strict control of Washington.
The format you specified is no longer relevant today. Russia participates only in those international structures and clubs where real problems are solved and the principle of equality prevails, where foreign standards and rules of behavior are not imposed on anyone.
— Not so long ago, President Biden, speaking in connection with the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, said that the era of power restructuring of sovereign states is ending.
— Let me remind you that almost every American president has made such statements over the past hundred years. Perhaps you know the expression “the war that will end all wars”? So, this formulation belongs more to Woodrow Wilson. He used it to persuade his fellow citizens to support his decision to join the United States Army in the First World War. And after that, the Americans started more wars than any other country. Another loud revelation of the White House — just words uttered more out of desperation. The authorities of the United States and Western countries in general are aware that their ability to influence the global situation and maintain their hegemony is decreasing every year. Internal problems in the West are rapidly accumulating and are already close to critical mass. This was especially evident in the United States last year, when the Capitol was stormed and racial protests inspired from within turned into real street battles.
For these reasons, it is increasingly difficult for Americans and their allies to dictate their will to the world. But this does not mean that they will abandon such an imperial strategy.
— Nikolai Patrushev
But this does not mean that they will abandon such an imperial strategy. Rather, their actions will become more aggressive and unpredictable in order to divert the attention of their societies from internal troubles at the expense of external adventures. This is how all the crumbling empires worked, from ancient Rome to Britain.
— But modern Britain never tires of demonstrating its own exclusivity and imperial ambitions, including sharply criticizing Russia and demanding that it change its line on the world stage.
— After leaving the European Union, London began to implement the “Global Britain” project with a vengeance. However, before trying to restore the former imperial grandeur, the British would do well to deal with the problems at home. A significant number of people in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland still do not consider themselves British. The English have driven the Scots into the mountains for centuries, the Welsh were used as cheap labor, and the Irish were taken out to work in the colonies as slaves. These peoples have been treated with as much neglect over the centuries as the Africans and Asians conquered by England.
During the signing of the Munich Agreement. From left to right: Chamberlain, Daladier, Hitler, Mussolini and Ciano.
London’s anti-Russian policy also has a long history. Since the end of the 19th century, Britain has been trying to incite Japan against Russia, provoking the war of 1904-1905, as a result of which our country was forced to make significant territorial concessions. They tried to repeat this with Nazi Germany, preparing the Munich agreement.
Today, the British want to build their empire under the new banner of “global Britain” using the old methods. This is a reason to think about both England itself and the countries and peoples who once experienced British colonial oppression.
— You mentioned Japan. Should she also take history lessons into account?
Absolutely. In August 1945, the Soviet Union, having defeated the Kwantung Army with lightning speed, regained everything that the Japanese militarists tried to take away from our country. Now, some politicians in Tokyo are trying to stir up the past and present some old accounts to Russia, continue to blindly follow American instructions and willingly get involved in anti-Chinese and anti-Russian schemes like the Indo-Pacific formats.
— Do you mean the QUAD association, which includes the United States, India, Australia and Japan?
— We are actually talking about a new military-political bloc with a pronounced pro-American character. In fact, QUAD is a prototype of the Asian equivalent of NATO. Washington will try to draw other countries into this organization, mainly for conducting anti-Chinese and anti-Russian policies.
Just a few days ago, another military bloc was formed in the region — the US-British-Australian AUKUS, which pursues the same goals. It is characteristic that when it was created, the Americans also squeezed out their French partners, intercepting a lucrative deal to build nuclear submarines for Canberra. Apparently, Atlantic solidarity also comes at a price. I think many people in Paris now remember the story of the Mistrals.
In order to implement another White House gamble to strengthen control over such a promising region as the Asia-Pacific region today, the entire security architecture in Asia is being compromised, and prerequisites are being created for undermining the authority of ASEAN and other regional associations.
— Today, in principle, the interest of the whole world is shifting from Western countries to the Asia-Pacific region, where half of the world’s population lives and a significant part of its economy is concentrated. Is this an objective process or the result of European miscalculations?
Asia today is now acquiring the same geopolitical and economic significance for the whole world that Europe once possessed.
— Nikolai Patrushev
– This is largely facilitated by the Europeans themselves, who allowed the so-called European project to delegate a significant part of the sovereignty of their states to Brussels. And who rules the ball in the EU authorities? Not representatives of European nations, but bureaucrats serving the interests of multinational corporations.
Trying to declare its ambitions in international politics, the European Union only discredits itself. The report on EU relations with Russia adopted last week confirms this. Continuing its anti-Russian policy, the European Parliament declared its readiness for non-recognition of the results even before the State Duma elections.
Today, more and more countries understand that the European Union can hardly expect anything other than mentoring lectures on human rights and instilling pseudo-liberal values.
At the same time, some European states have a good foreign policy background, including a huge experience of building diplomacy in all regions of the world, which has more than one hundred years. I am referring primarily to Germany, France and Italy. We hope that these Powers will eventually get rid of external influence and return to their once pragmatic and independent policies.
— But will Washington allow these countries to withdraw from the associations under its control?
— The United States is not interested in independent European states, so they are already trying to create local formats that are beneficial to them even within the European Union. For example, the “Three Seas Initiative”, which consolidates the countries of Eastern Europe. It is presented as a constructive integration format, but in reality we are talking about a new anti-Russian association of states. In fact, this is a revival of the idea of creating a so-called “sanitary cordon” along the western border of our country a century ago.
— Of the newly created such associations, in recent days a number of countries have paid special attention to the so-called “Crimean Platform”.
— The “Crimean Platform” was created by Washington for the sake of appearing to care about the interests of Ukraine. Its declared goals are doomed to failure. Plans to violate the territorial integrity of Russia will remain in the offices in which they appeared. Playing along with Ukraine’s unrealistic territorial ambitions is unwise and dangerous. The Crimean Platform has become a gathering of representatives of countries that support the official government in Kiev, which nurtures nationalists, panders to radicals and openly declares its readiness for large-scale military operations against Russia.
Zelensky’s visit to Washington showed the real face of those who allegedly care for the well-being of Ukraine. The agreements reached will only benefit American businesses, which are once again allowed to profit from Ukrainian projects out of competition. This is nothing but veiled colonialism. The population of Ukraine itself is actively presented with this anti-national policy as a movement towards the so-called progressive West. And there are many who believe this propaganda.
– Americans and Europeans claim that they protect human rights…
— What are human rights? Freedom, protection of life and health, equality before the law and the courts, personal dignity and much more. The West cares about human rights, but in fact violates them en masse. The same biological laboratories created by Washington around the world pose a threat to the health of tens of millions of people, thereby violating their rights. Dissent is persecuted in the United States itself, many people are deprived of the opportunity to receive normal medical care, and representatives of far from all races and nationalities can’t count on fair decisions of judges and the police.
The same thing is happening in Europe. In the Baltic States, for example, a real policy of apartheid is being implemented against the Russian-speaking population. People have been living without citizenship for years, that is, virtually outside the legal field, and their use of the Russian language is considered an offense. In Ukraine, the authorities pass discriminatory laws on the Russian language and on indigenous peoples, and the United States and Europe either do not want to notice or directly condone this.
Under the hypocritical slogans of the struggle for equality in the West, blatant discrimination against citizens who adhere to traditional values is organized. What is worth just one systematic undermining of normal gender relations, when the father and mother are renamed parents number one and two, they want to give children the right to choose their own gender, and in some cases it comes to legalizing marriages with animals.
It is unlikely that countries with rich centuries-old traditions will want to have something in common with such values. Imposing alien norms on society will further divide the world on the principle of “friend — foe”, will become a reason for provoking hostility between states, and will lead to polarization of society in those countries where they will try to artificially impose such stereotypes.
— What kind of agenda does Russia offer to the modern world in this regard?
— Our country stands for expanding equal multilateral cooperation, developing universal international institutions, and working together to reduce global tensions and strengthen international security.
If the West creates associations of states to solve short-term problems, contain countries that it does not like and suppress its own allies, then Russia and our partners in the SCO, BRICS, EEU, CSTO and CIS have no shadow agenda. Our countries share a common contribution to ensuring national security and global stability, recognition of the primacy of international law and the coordinating role of the UN, rejection of interference in the internal affairs of independent states, readiness to defend their national interests uncompromisingly and treat the sovereignty of other countries with understanding.
I think this Russian knows something!!!
Now, watch world events carefully!
Some fire! Sent to my friends who consider Russia a baaad place full of dictats and vodka. This is an excellent interview.
Granted though, Russia is a bit like that – can’t raise any livestock now if you have under 600 square meters on your dacha, and can’t have a beehive unless you are 300m or further from the neighbour’s fence.. still not genital mutilation though eh? ;’)
Man, these guys are so much more educated and nuanced than our talking heads and dummies. No wonder there’s always a sissy fit when these guys talk.
The gloves come off:
“𝘏𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘶𝘳, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘥𝘰 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘭 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘦. 𝘈 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘤𝘰𝘵𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥, 𝘞𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘕𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘐𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘥𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘩. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘤𝘰𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘩 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘱 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘐𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘯𝘦𝘨𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘈𝘴𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥.”
“…𝘐 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘴…”
“𝘛𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘴𝘦𝘶𝘥𝘰-𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘦𝘴.”
“𝘜𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘺𝘱𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘨𝘨𝘭𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵, 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘥𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥…𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘴.”
I do not remember Patrushev speaking like this in the past.
The dismissal of Brits & EU & some French regimes, no talk of partners.
Words of scorn.
And openly inviting Germany, France and Italy to leave sinking EU/Nato/USA.
He used to speak clinically like FM Lavrov.
Actually, for the past year or so he has been very unrestrained in his many public statements, interviews and meetings.
He’s not a diplomat. His portfolio is the security of the Russian Federation.
Nikolai Patrushev nails it. And towards the end of this outstanding interview, he invites us to roaring laughter, alternatively total disgust:
”Under the hypocritical slogans of the struggle for equality in the West, blatant discrimination against citizens who adhere to traditional values is organized. What is worth just one systematic undermining of normal gender relations, when the father and mother are renamed parents number one and two, they want to give children the right to choose their own gender, and in some cases it comes to legalizing marriages with animals”
To paraphrase Sir Paul McCartney:
”European values” look ever more fascinating these days.
In a previous column you posed a question as to why Soros and his ilk are intent on destroying the social fabric of their host country, in effect bringing about its destruction internally. I didn’t have the opprtunity to suggest an answer earlier but what Patrushev says may give us a clue, to wit:
…Internal problems in the West are rapidly accumulating and are already close to critical mass.…
…But this does not mean that they will abandon such an imperial strategy. Rather, their actions will become more aggressive and unpredictable in order to divert the attention of their societies from internal troubles at the expense of external adventures. …
Patrushev’s ‘internal problems’ are what Soros is about. The globalists are intent on bringing about war between the great powers, principally to weaken all of them; they will become smouldering shells of their former selves. And in the aftermath globalists will dust themselves off and take over the show.
There is a theory of ‘sanctuarisation’ or ring-fencing in case of nuclear war — parties involved will tacitly agree not to target certain places: eg I don’t hit RF or certain parts of it, or China mainland, you don’t hit Continental US, etc; let’s confine the bombing to Europe or East Asia, etc. The globalists probably think this theory can be brought into play — one reason, I believe, why they’re buying land with plentiful water, suitable for animal husbandry, agriculture, etc in NZ and Argentina –, will survive the nuclear holocaust and will carry on from there. Sounds crazy but there you are.
Nato lecture mentioning ‘sanctuarisation’:
PS. Nice paraphrase of McCartney’s lyrics. Now I can’t get ‘Yesterday’ out of my head :)
It’s very conspicuous by now that the West is in deep s••t once China (1989) and Russia (1999) got the foreign scum and their dedicated local traitors off their backs. Neoliberalism saw to it that greed, incompetence, and ’post-industrial’ voodoo economics destroyed the West’s industrial and fiscal base. It has finally come to the point where NATO cannot even keep Afghanistan (while It may well keep Gównopolska and the Baltic insects until final collapse of the Empire ensues).
Soros is one of the players who ’saw the light’. He’s having a field day in the US and doesn’t seem to worry about the consequences for the Exceptionals and Indispensables.
Last but not least, here is the final verse — in quite a literal sense with regard to the fate of Western civilization, LOL:
It looks like I agree with everything you wrote. Thank you for being so forthright.
Trying to save the current order is a big mistake. The US, Britain, and the EU will drag the world down anyway. They are totally committed to the ruin of the world so that their elite cabal can rule over the remainder. Accept this and take action.
If you try to save the world from this evil you will only give the evil more time for more machinations. The US, UK and EU should be brought under maximum pressure to force a collapse. These states as they currently exist need to be ended. They cannot reform; they cannot change. They are a perversion of their historical ideals grasped by a madness which seeks to conquer. Diseased relics of a previous age. Their die is cast. Their efforts to ruin Russia and others will continue and may succeed given sufficient time. Don’t allow it to happen.
I agree with you,the problem is that Russia and China have not understood that they are in a battle for all the marbles.Their enemies are fighting to destroy them.And will not stop until Russia and China are broken apart as states.Since they don’t plan anything that evil themselves they find it hard to believe others would be that evil.Hopefully they will understand that before its too late for them.
Actually, it’s the US led Atlantic bloc that is running out of time. The US has come to the brink of disintegration by liberal authoritarianism of the Biden régime. States are openly challenging woke policies of the central govt. On the other hand, the AUKUS deal had created a rift within the NATO, which might lead to France’s separation from the bloc.
Russia and China have enough time. What they should do is to increase their resilience by reducing the reliance on economic ties with the West. This has been proven successful by Russia’s resilience in tbe face of Western sanctions. Trying to start wars at this stage would hurt their own countries.
“And will not stop until Russia and China are broken apart as states.”
That ship sailed long ago. Won’t happen. And if it did, that would definitely be the end of the planet.
“Tying to save the current order is a big mistake. The US, Britain, and the EU will drag the world down anyway. They are totally committed to the ruin of the world so that their elite cabal can rule over the remainder. Accept this and take action.
If you try to save the world from this evil you will only give the evil more time for more machinations. The US, UK and EU should be brought under maximum pressure to force a collapse. These states as they currently exist need to be ended. They cannot reform; they cannot change. They are a perversion of their historical ideals grasped by a madness which seeks to conquer. Diseased relics of a previous age. Their die is cast. Their efforts to ruin Russia and others will continue and may succeed given sufficient time. Don’t allow it to happen.”
It’s imperative to understand that the Anglo-American ruling classes (and their allies) are pure unadulterated psychopaths.
They cannot be reasoned with–and certainly can never be trusted.
They are like the proverbial Snake in the Garden of Eden. Lies and Deceit are fundamental to their character.
Moreover, these Anglo Americans possess a fanatical belief in their own moral righteousness and think that they have a God-ordained right to dominate the world and destroy anyone who stands in their way.
The USA in particular is an Old Testament nation. It is a Crusader Empire filled with messianic narcissism to smite the “unbelievers” in the gospel of Americanism.
Thanks for this.
This interview certainly makes RF thinking very clear. Nikolai Patrushev lays it out as he sees it and I’m willing to bet this professional — I believe he, the late Minister of Emergencies, and Gasprom boss go back a long way (read, KGB) with VVP — uses even stronger language in his meetings with VVP and RF ruling inner circle.
He couldn’t have put the difference between RF and the Empire more starkly than in the last paragraph. Here is a country that stands for the direct opposite of the destructive behaviour of the West, can read correctly any moves by it to bring further destruction, is beginning to put its foot down, and intends to prevail should push come to shove. And United Russia has won the elections, the treasonous Navalny’s ‘tactical voting’ app notwithstanding — all cause for quiet celebration and optimism for RoW, I would think.
It shouldn’t be the Western taxpayers who should pay reparations, it should be limited solely to the following:
1. The Western War Industries and their major investors on Wall Street and other major exchanges.
2. The politicians who voted for wars and based outrageous defence budgets on Capitol Hill.
3. All the Deep State institutions like the CIA, NSA, the TLC, the CFR,- the senior offiicer of the forces that carried out all the murdering.
4. The billionaires whose blackmailing and purchase of paid-for politicians has been behind so much of the violence.
5. The violent Zionists in Israel, the USA and elsewhere (including a few in Russia) who are constantly fomenting war and demanding that the USA and its satrapies fight them.
It is beyond time that the people who perpetrated these acts pay the price, not the people who happened to be born in the nation of those odious criminals.
Please stop referring to the plutocrats who control Britain as ‘the British’.
We, the British people do NOT want any more imperialism. We do NOT want any more wars. We do NOT want to be the USA’s bumboy.
We want Britain to trade globally and peacefully. That is what Global Britain means to us. It does not mean naval equivalents of the Charge of the Light Brigade thinking that a couple of Aircraft Carriers will defeat a Russian or Chinese adversary.
When you refer to Boris Johnson et al, please refer to ‘the bumbling Old Etonian oafs, twits and spivs who think that bullshitting for three years at Oxford makes them fit to rule the world.’
Please refer to the ‘psychopathic wordsmiths of the London-based press, filled as it is with amoral prostitutes who would incite mass murder just to get a salary of £150k a year.’
Let me tell you about a few real British folks:
A couple who took over a large greenhouse/nursery to establish a high quality seeds business selling locally produced seed to customers who value germination frequencies and plant vigour several levels higher than you get from mere multinationals.
A couple who have made a business producing fruit crushers and presses for both home- and commercial use. Their products seek to ensure that wastage of fruit harvests are minimised through providing a means to make high quality juice.
These people value healthy food, healthy liquid refreshment and they are nowhere advertising their hatred of Russia nor the need to point nukes at you.
I could describe hundreds more small businesses in the UK like that.
We are not a nation of bloodthirsty murderers.
We are a nation whose corridors of power are transiently occupied with corrupt, ignorant, arrogant, immature little boys and girls promised a few measly million if they act as gauleiters for the USA. We have an opposition led by a leader who helped to lock up Julian Assange, who was pre-selected for his position by the USA and Israel, not by the British people and who has about as much ability to lead as the average Brit would have in surviving a Siberian winter in the woods.
What we have is one set of leaders shouting at another set of leaders and millions of ordinary people worldwide just wishing they would shut up and go and see a psychiatrist.
@ Rhys Jaggar
Let us know if this minority you refer to is organized. Until they organize, they cannot do anything to change the situation.