This article was written for the Unz Review.
This is a topic which has had so much written about it that you could fill an entire city library with books entirely dedicated to this topic. Marx took a shot at it. As did Sartre. There were, of course, also plenty of good books written on this topic, but rather than list them all, I want to suggest a few simple common sense points and then go to what I consider an authoritative explanation of this thing we call “antisemitism” and which, of course, has nothing to do with Semites.
So first, let’s dump this silly term and replace it by a simple and straightforward one: judeophobia. Just like any other phobia (say, for example, russophobia) the phobia of X is the 1) fear and/or hatred of X. Some people hate Jews, others fear them (think of the “fear of the Jews” in the Scripture), some do both. So judeophobia seems both logical and uncontroversial to me.
Second, it is a truism to say that everything in the universe has a cause. That includes phobias. Including russophobia and judeophobia. For example, I would be the first person to admit that there are objective characteristics of the Russian people which makes other people fear and hate them. Like the fact that all western attempts at conquering Russia have failed. Or that the Russians have always, and still are, rejecting the Papacy. Just these two factors will create plenty of russophobia in the West, for sure.
So, the next thing we can ask ourselves is what is it in Jews which causes judeophobia. Alas, before I look into this, I need to clarify a number of assumptions I make.
The first one is that Jews are not a race or ethnicity. To prove that, I defer to Shlomo Sand’s book “The Invention of the Jewish People”. As I explained elsewhere, Jews are a tribe: A group one can chose to join (Elizabeth Taylor) or leave (Gilad Atzmon). In other words, I see “Jewishness” as a culture, or ideology, or education or any other number of things, but not something rooted in biology. However, I also fully agree with Atzmon when he says that Jews are not a race, but that Jewish culture/politics/ideology is racist (more about that later).
Next, there is also what is commonly known as “Judaism”. That, by the way, is also a misnomer, at least if by “Judaism” you refer the faith of the Old Testament, the faith of the Ancient Israel, the “God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our forefathers”. Modern “Judaism” which was created well after the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70AD. Modern “Judaism” ought be to called “Pharisaic Talmudism” and its true creators are Shimon bar Yochia, Maimonides (aka “Rambam” in the video below), Joseph Karo and Isaac Luria. The reason why this religion ought to be referred to as Pharisaic Talmudism is modern Judaism is the continuation of the sect of the Pharisees (the only Jewish sect which survived the destruction of Jerusalem and of the Temple – all modern forms of “Judaism” trace their roots to the Pharisees) and that it’s main source of authority is the Talmud, a collection of writings based on the ideas of the sect of the Pharisees and complied from the beginning of the 2nd century. To separate them from non-religious Jews, some authors have offered the term “Judaic” to describe a person adhering to this faith. Seems reasonable to me.
Here is the key thing, while many modern Jews are non-religious and really members of a self-described Jewish tribe, there is no such thing in history as a “Jewish culture” distinct from Pharisaic Talmudism. Remember that national categories are recent creations from the 18th and 19th centuries. For most of history people defined them in reference to 1) their place of residence or birth 2) their religious affiliation and 3) the identity of the ruler they were subjects of. In contrast, nationality and ethnicity are largely modern concepts. The only thing common to a Jew from the Middle-East, Central Europe and North Africa would be teachings of Pharisaic Talmudism. It is only logical therefore to look at this unique common characteristic to try to identify the causes of the hatred and fear Jews have inspired pretty much everywhere they have ever resided.
I will use two official Jewish sources to ascertain the causes of antisemitism, first the Simon Wiesenthal Multi-Media Learning Center’s website and a lecture by Rabbi David Bar Hayim.
Here is what the Simon Wiesenthal Center writes on the page “Why The Jews? The Patterns of Persecution”
Jewish communities existed continuously in Europe for over 2,000 years. Many of these communities were older than the countries in which they existed. Nevertheless, as the countries of Europe developed, Jews were rarely given complete citizenship status. At best they were tolerated as guests. Their social and religious distinctiveness made them persistent targets for persecution; and such persecution, in turn, intensified the cohesiveness of Jewish communities.
The emergence of Christianity as the dominant religion in Europe intensified the persecution of Jews. Since both the religious and political life of Europe became organized around the Christian faith, Jews were seen as outcasts, the deniers and “killers” of Christ. For millions of European Christians, for over 1600 years, the hatred and persecution of Jews was religiously sanctioned. Antisemitism intensified during the l9th and 20th century industrialization of Europe as Jews participated more directly in European economic and social life.
By 1933, the patterns of economic, social, and personal persecution of European Jews were well established. Nazi racial antisemitism and propaganda amplified and manipulated these patterns, ultimately adding one deadly tenet–that all Jews must be eliminated.
This is the garden variety cop-out: they were older, but never given citizenship, they were tolerated as guests, their social and religious distinctiveness made them targets for persecution, then the Christians accused them of killing Christ, antisemitism was religiously sanctioned, then came the Nazis and added their racist propaganda. But it has a grain of truth buried deep inside the rest of the platitudes: “social and religious distinctiveness”. What are we talking about here exactly?
This sounds interesting so let’s immediately delve into it!
The following is a lecture by Rabbi David Bar-Hayim whose biography, and gently smiling face, you can find on Wikipedia. For our purposes, just the first paragraph will be enough. It says that Bar-Hayim is an “Israeli Orthodox rabbi who heads the Shilo Institute (Machon Shilo), a Jerusalem-based rabbinical court and institute of Jewish education dedicated to the Torah of Israel”. Not a lightweight by any means, and a man with established credentials. Now let’s listen to what he has to say.
I strongly encourage you to take the time to carefully listen to his entire lecture (1h47m) to not only convince yourself that my chosen excerpts are not partial or taken out of context, but also to get an emotional “feel” for the man who not only is an articulate speaker who is clearly used to teaching, but who also conveys a coherent picture of a man who gave these topics a great deal of thought and who has to courage to call things by their names rather than to “remain silent” like so many of his “politically correct” colleges.
So here is this lecture:
also, and just in case this lecture would “mysteriously” disappear from YouTube following the publication of my article, I decided to re-upload it here:
Next, here are a key statements from the beginning of this lecture posted along their time-stamp so you can check for their authenticity:
- 09:20 The Torah teaches that the life of a Jew is more precious than the life of a non-Jew.
- 10:00 God (HaShem) prefers Jews to non-Jews and gives them a special status.
- 11:00 The notion that Jews and non-Jews are equally precious to God contradicts the spirit of the Torah from beginning to end.
- 16:40 According to Shimon bar Yochia (aka Rashbi) “the best of non-Jews should be killed in warfare” because just as Jews cannot know if a snake approaching you is venomous or not, Jews cannot know which non-Jew is a danger to then.
- 25:16 Jews must assume that it is likely that any non-Jew they meet does not live by the Noahide Laws.
Here an explanation is needed about the so-called “Noahide Laws”. According to Wikipedia (I use it as the hyper-politically-correct source) the Noahide Laws “are a set of imperatives which, according to the Talmud, were given by God as a binding set of laws for the “children of Noah” – that is, all of humanity”. Here are these laws as listed by Maimonides himself:
- Prohibition of Idolatry
- Prohibition of Blasphemy
- Prohibition of Homicide
- Prohibition of Sexual Immorality
- Prohibition of Theft
- Prohibition of Limb of a Living Creature
- Imperative of Legal System
Sounds “kinda not modern”, but hey, that is no “worse” than the 10 Commandants, right? Wrong! Wrong for two crucial reasons. First, the penalty for breaking any one of these laws, at least according to Rabbi David Bar-Hayim, is death (listen to the lecture for yourself!). Second, this list uses a euphemism when is speaks of “idolatry”. What is meant here is not some pagan blood ceremony to sacrifice babies to some god of thunder, but “Avodah Zarah”. How do I know that? Listen to the lecture again, the Rabbi is very clear about it. And what exactly is “Avodah Zarah”? It is “foreign worship” or, to put it simply, the religions of the aliens, the others, the nations, the goyim. This is exactly the accusation made by Pharisaic Judaics against Christianity: making “That Man” (the typical Talmudic reference to Christ) into an idol. True, during the Middle-Ages overt references to Christianity were obfuscated and even today to the question whether Avodah Zarah is applicable to Christianity the official answer is wonderfully hypocritical: Christianity is a “special type of avodah zarah is forbidden to Jews but permissible to gentiles, so that a non-Jew who engages in Christian worship commits no sin”. First, this is an explicit modern Jewish admission that those Jews who convert to Christianity are committing a crime deserving the death penalty. But, more importantly, this is clearly a cop-out as this “special type of avodah zarah” has no basis in traditional Pharisaic Talmudic teachings. So this might come as a shock to many, but according to Pharisaic Talmudists, all Christians deserve to be killed for the sin of idolatry. Feel the love…
Now here is the sad part, in the USA these rabidly anti-Christians laws have been proclaimed as the “bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization” by both President Reagan and Congress. And to think that these guys fancy themselves as “Christians”…
I am sure that there are those who are absolutely convinced that what I wrote above is a gross misrepresentation of fact, that there is no way “Judaism” would really teach any such horrors. Think again, and listen to the Rabbi himself:
- 25:33 Those who do not keep the Seven Noahide Laws are all therefore guilty of a capital offense
- 25:49 “Avoda Zara”, i.e. idolatry meaning Christianity was the most common offense.
Of course, for those who know anything about Pharisaic Talmudism none of the above will come as any surprise. After all, did the Rabbi not also clearly state that:
- 16:40 According to Shimon bar Yochia (aka Rashbi) “the best of non-Jews should be killed in warfare” because just as Jews cannot know if a snake approaching you is venomous or not, Jews cannot know which non-Jew is a danger to then.
Non-Jews are explicitly compared to snakes! He also says something similar later in the lecture:
- 26:15 since you cannot bring a perishing non-Jew to court to establish his guilt, you take a neutral position by neither helping him nor killing him.
You got that? Since, like with snakes, it is impossible to tell a dangerous non-Jews apart from a safe one, you cannot just kill him. For that you need a ruling by a rabbinical court. But saving him is no option either, because he most likely deserves the death penalty (say, for being a Christian). So you do nothing when you see a non-Jew in danger or even perishing. Interestingly enough, the Rabbi is also asked if that kind of non-assistance to a person in danger could not negatively impact the reputation of Jews and he immediately replies:
- 1:22:00 if not saving a non-Jew makes Jews look bad, then the Jew ought to lie about his motives
So it is okay to let a non-Jew die and, if challenged, just lie about it!
The key concept here is simple: Jews are more important to God and, therefore, to themselves than non-Jews. This is why
- 1:00:30 there is no requirement to return a lost object to a non-Jew
- 1:17:40 Jews can brake the sabbath to save a Jew but not a non-Jew because Jews do not consider all lives to be equal
I will stop the examples here. The Rabbi clearly says that the humanistic notion that all humans are equal is contrary to the entire spirit of the Torah. If after that you don’t get it….
What about the so-called Golden Rule about “do unto others”?
What about these:
- You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your kinsfolk. Love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD (Leviticus 19:18 )
- What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow: this is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn. (Shabbath folio:31a, Babylonian Talmud)
Did you notice the key caveats “your kindsfolk” and “your fellow”. Pharisaic Talmudism interprets these passages are referring only to fellow Jews and not to the semi-bestial goyim! It is laughable to a Rabbi when he hears a non-Jew saying that all humans were created in the image and likeness of God. Pharisaic Talmudism explicitly contradicts that (and the Kabbalah even more so!). Still don’t agree? Which part of “ the humanistic notion that all humans are equal is contrary to the entire spirit of the Torah” don’t you get?!
The simple truth is that Pharisaic Talmudism (aka modern “Judaism”) is the only religion which teaches a God-revealed racism.
This is hardly a new discovery of mine. Just read Michael Hoffman’s superb magnum opus Judaism Discovered (available on Amazon and on his on his website). In fact, there have been thousands of books already written on this topic, and many are available online for download in various file formats. What makes the video by Rabbi David Bar-Hayim so interesting is that it is 1) official 2) recent 3) that he really confirms it all. But for those who, like myself and, I am sure, many readers here, have known about it for decades, this was absolutely nothing new.
A couple of crucial caveats here: there are many Jews out there (most, I would say) who are totally unaware of all this. Even “Conservative” and “Reform” synagogues don’t preach that too overtly (though sometimes even they do). This kind of religious racism is mostly taught in Orthodox Yeshivas and, of course, in various Haredi institutions in Israel. For these ignorant Jews any such explanations of the causes of antisemitism in world history are not only offensive (blaming the victim) but also completely unfair (“my family never said any such things!”). Second, while this kind of, frankly, demonic teachings have only been taught in religious circles, they nevertheless also have had a deep impact upon the outlook of many (but not all!) secular Jews many of whom might never have been told that all Christians deserve to be executed, but who still will have a profound and almost knee-jerk repulsion towards Christianity. The distance between Rabbi David Bar-Hayim and Sarah Silverman and her famous quote “I hope that Jews did kill Christ, I’d do it again in a second” is very, very short.
Finally, for all the (alas many) bone-headed racists out there, none of that Pharisaic ideology is transmissible by genes so please don’t give me that “all Jews” nonsense. Some Jews do espouse these views, others don’t. Remember, Jews are not a race or ethnicity, they are a tribe. A Jew who completely rejects all this religiously-sanctioned racism about goyims does not somehow still mysteriously carry in himself some “Talmudic bacillum” which can flare up and turn him overnight into a hate-filled racist.
[Sidebar: For whatever it is worth, in my life I have seen more kindness and compassion from (secular) Jews than from my fellow Orthodox Christians. Very often in my life I have had secular Jews being like the Good Samaritan from the Gospel (Luke 10:25-37):
And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?
And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.
Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?
And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.
Notice two things: first, Christ frontally debunks the racist interpretation of the words “thy neighbor” and, second, He also clearly commands us how we should treat all of our neighbors.]
So now we have it: the root causes of antisemitism are not to be found in some weird cause-less aberration common to every single nation on earth, but in the teachings of Pharisaic Talmudism. What is exceptionally pernicious is that by what could be referred to as cultural-osmosis non-religious Jews find themselves raised in a secular culture which still holds this kinds of beliefs, minus their external religious trappings.
Furthermore, there are many non-Jews who, when seeing both religious secular Jews equally hostile to their religion and traditions, come to the conclusion that “all Jews” are bad. Throw in enough politicians (on both sides) to bring a flame to this toxic mix and you end up with an inevitable explosion. Hence all the persecutions.
Judeophobia has its roots in the demonic teachings of the sect of the Pharisees whose religiously-sanctioned racism has, unfortunately, permeated the worldview of many secular Jews. As long as Orthodox rabbis will stick to their demented self-worship (this is real idolatry, by the way!), “antisemitism” will continue to “mysteriously” rear its ugly head.
Brecht was right, “’The belly is still fertile from which the foul beast sprang”. He just got the ‘belly’ wrong.
Good piece Saker. You have studied on the subject, that is good. For me Maccabees is an eye opener as to the decomposition of the Jewish faith in to a political nightmare. Christ was very clear when he chastised the Pharisees for abandoning the faith of their Fathers for the man made doctrine, the Mishnah then the Talmud, although the first wasn’t compiled yet and it took them about 400 years to do so.
Also the Saduceans did survive as far as I remember, but they were killed by the Pharisees.
“Remember, Jews are not a race or ethnicity, they are a tribe. ”
-Except tribe is the same as ethnicity, and it is based in biology, also genetic tests has proven that Jews exist as a distinct biological identity. And while most liberal allows for conversion, orthodox or “real” Jews do not. And those that convert to Judaism counts as “unclean” Jews forever. There are for example laws in Israel prohibiting converted Jews from marring the Cohen class of Jews, which is viewed as extra ancient and “pure”.
A little homework for ‘Anonymous’:
– Regards, Shyaku
Come on, its quite simple.
It is exactly as TheSaker writes in the article, its culture.
Analysis of why the 95% black people in Barbados developed a sophisticated wealthy democratic culture while the exact the same ancient genetic roots of blacks i Haiti developed a poor disorganised society showed Its all about culture and not genetics.
The situation in Haiti is the result of 200 years of Western vengefulness for the slave revolt of 1804. ie European racist ‘culture’.
France demanded, and received, reparations for the loss of French property after the revolt until very recently, amounting to many billions of dollars from the Haitians. This loss of capital impacted the ability to build any decent infrastructure.
If Jews are not a race, then how is it that DNA testing is required by Israel for “right of return”?
One can bring contradictory “studies” because a collective “distinct biological identity” is a vague concept in that case. One third of the Irish have red hairs; does it mean that there is an Irish “race”? The prevalence of some genetic diseases can also be considered as a minor aspect. I mean, if Hitler forced them to carry a yellow star, it’s also because the majority of them were just looking like the other people around.
Of course Irish is a race, in the sense that they are genetically distinct group.
It is not a vague concept it is a very clear and very easily verifiable concept. You take an Irish, a German, a Russian, a Swede a Jew and do a genetic test and based on this test you know 100% who is the Jew.
“One can bring contradictory “studies””
-Of course, you can always do that, especially in politically incorrect fields were scientist risk losing their lively-hoods for wrong-think. Although no amount of suppress stops the steady advance of genetics and the decay of irrational ideologies such culturalmarxism.
If Irish & Jews & British are “races”, then why not saying that people from Belfast, Dublin & Cork are different races if you have minor differences in their average DNA? We could expect to find such a thing if they mostly used to live in the same towns & villages for centuries. The DNA for a group evolves you know.
Samething for German Jews vs Russian Jews or sepharade Jews from Morocco vs Turkey. But there is no such study because it’s irrelevant if your sole goal is to find minor similitudes or differences for a broad group of Jews – for political reasons -.
Hello, of course you can, you could draw the line on race as narrow as you want, you could say a group dogs with a special bump on their nose is a race if it is genetic distinct.
However, it is fair to point out, genetics is not actually used in racial classification, it is visible inheritable difference in groups that is used for basis of deciding race.
Although genetics does prov that not only are say blacks and whites and Japanese genetically distinct from each other, but also Swedes and Germans, Russians and Poles, British and French. We actually live in a very diverse and rich world, much unlike the dull mind numbing world that the culturemarxist try to push on us.
“British” cannot be a race since “British” is a made-up term from the 18th Century Hanoverian Monarchy. There are major differences between Celts and Normans and Angles and Saxons. If you are speaking of DNA then there is less variation, but some people think Culture
You might find this illuminating
A little mis-conception here …. no matter how the biological structure of tribes and ethnicities are – tribes are not ethnicities. Tribes can be both, foreign beraing ones, as also the possibility of a tribe being composed by many non-related individuals. Ethnicity comes out right out of general biological commonry – cause ethnic groups are rooted in historical relationship of the group, thus being racially bound as a distinctive genetic lineage, or family. ( that’s why “Ethnic cleansing” is the name for elimination of specific genotypes ). It isn’t a clear thing either, but much more the reality of genetic commonry, as ethnic – thus cultural bounds in history were created by groups of living together in close relationship, distinct of others around. ….. nowadays it can be blurred completely out of sensible usage of these words, cause, in these modern days, especially in western nations – cultures were destroyed, ethnicities mixed ( either by shifting of the masses or search for work – my own historic countryman ( Slowakia ), just as now, and visible especially in Poles – go far for work, many times staying there for good — this is a hing, that a two or three hundred years wasn’t really a possibility ). Culture also is nowadays non-existent mostly, even if many things are perceived as ones, they have no more roots and are nowadays-world situation driven rather than of a tight, distinctive group of peoples through generations. Which, heavily, makes genetic-ideologies lately obsolete more and more.
Few years ago, sorting old things, i found a brochure.
A kind of religious giveaway brochure that were very common in Russian cities in 1990-s: as anti-religious USSR failed all kind of foreign preachers saw ex-USSR population having no experience with religious marketing as a soil to fertilize. So, there were LOTS of missionaries of all raiths and cults, and they were spreading their leaflets around.
Well, that certain brochure – i wonder how it ended in our house – was exactly by orthodox Judaists and was critics and debinking of Christian Jews on many different levels, including interpretation of Bible and Torah lines, that Christian Jews based their message upon.
However, one of the reason Judaism was better religion than Christianity was said to be exactly the problem of missionaries. They say that Judaism considers the testament as a non-extensible deal with God their forefathers did. They said, Judaism does not accept foreign members, as only brethren of the few people God made that deal with can inherit rights and obligations of the contract. Other people should search for their own ways to make conracts with God if they want to and are capable of. And this, they claimed, made Judaism non-aggresive neutral religion, comparing with Christianity and Islam that sought to convert infidels “with sword and with fire”.
I can not say how common that stance is among Judaists, i just tell that that was a message of Judean religious leaflet of that time in Russia
You need to read Shlomo Sand’s book, which The Saler recommended, and not advertise your ignorance.
Why do you think Jews themselves distinguish between Ashkenazis and Sephardim ? Some Jews in central Asia consider themselves Bukharin Jews, as a third lineage.
The conversion of the Khazar kingdom to Judaism is well known, even if you never saw Sand’s book. But this Ph.D. historian and former Israeli university professor also wrote about a massive amount of conversion to Judaism in North Africa from evangelizing in the 4th Century C.E.
So Jews have multiple ancestries. We can’t afford to be simpletons about this.
Saker wrote an excellent essay here. I didn’t know that only the Pharisees survived, and I’m going to get myself informed on that.
More insights from pioneer Dreyfusard Bernard Lazare : ANTISEMITISM
ITS HISTORY AND CAUSES (1894) Texts in French and English in pdf.
And a very incomplete list of Jewish dissidents …
Sands wrote it before more accurate data had been collected so he may have been in good faith. You are right about the jews being mixed but the Khazar part is negligible.
One Israeli DNA researcher holds on to the theory but he isnt prevented from publishing it.
The rest claim he hasnt considered all the data.
There may be selfish geopolitical motives for the empire and Israel to use the Khazar theory.
There is in the historical records from Spain in the 1100s a witness account from someone who encountered Khazar jews. But this doesnt mean they were other than a minority.
Jews are God’s Chosen People.
Hence, anyone who is not a Jew is “less than” and can be treated as such.
This kind of religious supremacy just might generate some resentment (i.e., antisemitism) among non-Jews.
It should also be added that the idea of American Exceptionalism is closely related to Zionism in that it conceives of Americans as The Divine Select, who have been chosen by God as a “shining city on a hill” and “beacon of liberty” for all humanity.
Indeed, David Gelernter in his book _Americanism: The Fourth Great Western Religion_ essentially argues that American and Zionism are ideological bloodkin.
Many modern, mainstream Jews interpret choseness slightly differently than this. They profess to believe that Jews are chosen by God to live high moral ideals and chosen to set a good example for humanity, etc. etc. Many of the liberal (neocon) Jews that I know in San Francisco claim to be uncomfortable with the idea of being chosen by God to be above all others and do not assert that.
One of my favourite analysts says “people will believe what they need to believe, when they need to believe it”.
Cynical but true.
They never tell the reason why they are chosen. If i was informed correctly they are chosen because they followed the orders given to them by God(s) the best. Most loyal, best slaves God had.
Something to be pround of??
I’ve heard that one often enough, from Jews who do not necessarily live up to high moral ideals. And we can DEFINITELY state that such a claim, when made for the likes of the entire Israeli political elite, the ultra-orthodox and orthodox, the ‘settler’ Judaic Taliban and many bullying stand-over thugs in the Diaspora, is a very sick joke indeed. Of course some Jews have been and are, moral paragons, but I do have trouble seeing an Einstein or a Menuhin as equivalent to a Begin or Nutty-yahoo.
You are right. Many Jews do not live up to high morals.
However, the morals that are at stake here are not the morals of Western society. We are talking about the morals of the Bible or, more precisely, the ancient testament. Some of them were taken by Western civilization, but not all.
You should look at the ultra-orthodox for this moral reference. Of course, no one is perfect. Like in every society, there are good and bad folks. But the good deeds and morals in the ultra-orthodox society are not news so you almost never hear about it. Also, the ultra-orthodox society is less open to the outside world so it makes things more difficult to perceive it for an outsider. What you usually hear is the despicable behavior of a minority of this group.
It’s not only the modern & mainstream Jew who see this “choseness” this way. That’s the view of orthodox judaism in general. According to traditional orthodox judaism, Jews should not deal with politics outside their their land. There would be much less judeophobia…
Why such universal hostility against the Jews?
Let them tell why…
Jewish author, Bernard Lazare (1865-1903) in Anti-Semitism: History and Causes (1894), says:
‘The Jews themselves were the cause of this antagonism…
…unsociable, strangers everywhere, without a country, without any interest but that of their sect, plagues on the countries where fate has carried them’.
Such candour is unheard of today, but in the past, Jewish leaders openly admitted that ‘anti-Semitism’ was a natural reaction against the behaviour of Jews.
Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of the modern Zionist movement, expressed the view that anti-Semitism was not an aberration, but rather a natural response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behaviour and attitudes. Herzl said: ‘The Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers. Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews…’
He elaborated further… ‘Anti-Jewish sentiment is not due to ignorance or bigotry, as so many have claimed. Instead, the ancient and seemingly intractable conflict between Jews and non-Jews is entirely understandable, because Jews are a distinct and separate people, with interests that are different from, and which often conflict with, the interests of the people among whom they live’.
Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann, (1874 Belarus -1952 Israel) expressed a similar view in his memoirs: ‘Whenever the quantity of Jews in any country reaches the saturation point that country reacts against them … [This] reaction … cannot be looked upon as anti-Semitism…’
(C Weizmann. Trial and Error. p90)’
Indeed – history shows that every time the Jews reached saturation point, that nation resisted and responded with extreme measures by expelling them.
Lazare, Bernard. L’Anti-Semitisme, (Paris 1894). Web-Internet Archive
Herzl, T. Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State), (Germany 1896). Web-Project Gutenberg
Weber, Mark. Straight Talk about Zionism. (Article 4 April 2009). Web-Institute of Historical Review
Actually, Jews and goyim lived happily enough for long periods in Europe, and for centuries under the Moors in Spain and the Ottoman Empire. There were occasional outbursts of violence, but that was common between various groups. It seems that a strong central authority that kept Judaic chauvinism and supremacism under check allowed Jews and goyim to enrich one another’s societies, culture and learning.
Yes, you have hit on something here.
Byzantium, which was the longest surviving empire in history, 1200 years, did so by enforcing three laws, 1- no Jews in Government 2- no Jews in finance 3- no Jews in education
This system worked and spared the Byzantinians an otherwise subversive force.
You see, since way back to Babylon, when the Babylonians took them in , they spared no effort to undermine and subvert their hosts in order to gain control and power. They subsequently sold out the Babylonians to the Persians. And to add insult to injury, they re-wrote the history books and we are told of the ‘Whore of Babylon’. When world acclaimed historians swear that the Babylonians were a hard-working, honest and sober people.
Likewise, they soon turned against their new hosts the niave Persians, where they turned the mighty Persian ruler on his own people. Purges, death and destruction soon followed, climaxing into a murderous killing orgy of some 80,000 Persian subjects in what is know in Judiasm as ‘Purim’. That’s right, they celebrate the slaughter of innocents by drinking as much alcohol and getting as belligerent as possible. Purim is a major holiday too.
Then they were mistakenly taken in by the Egyptians. Not before long, they sold out their hosts to a nefarious folk called the Hyksos, who were practically let in the gates by said Jews. Ther Hyksos were a brutal people who ruled over the Egyptians for 400 years, with the rule of the iron fist. The Egyptians suffered and suffered, always keeping in mind the Jewish backstab and betrayal. When the Egyptians came back to power and evicted the Hyksos, they told the Jews they could stay, but it wont be business as usual. Hence many were enslaved. Better that they thought than wandering around isolated from humankind, as professed in their Talmud. Historians like to say that the Pharaoh had a ‘Jewish’ Prime Minister in Prophet Joseph, but Prophet Joseph was not Jewish, he was semitic, who was enlightened and believed, by God’s will, in only one Supreme creator of everything created. Hence One God. And he was one of God’s Prophets to humankind in that era, in that region specifically.
Btw, a ‘Muslim’ , essentially means ‘one who’s submitted no God, But Allah (God)’. So Prophet Joseph was in essence a Muslim.
On we go to the Greeks, who soon found themselves subverted by a foreign infestation of a usurious and Satanically greedy folk who the Greeks has numerous uprisings and upheavel. Even dragging Greece into wars.
It didn’t stop there. In Rome, the Jews and their means and ways got so bad, that when Caesar emancipated them, from restrictive laws to reign in their nefarious ways, the Senate was so outraged that they assassinated Caesar. Jews for many yaers after that incendent, would come and weep at the site of the ‘assassinated Hero’ to the Jews. Mark Anthony listened carefully to Cleopatra and wisened up to the grand Jewish inspired plot against Rome. On top of that, they found their way to Carthage, where the gloves came off completely. The Jews were said by barbarians and commoners to have practiced ritual murder to a huge epitaph of one of their Gods, ‘Moloch’. They were recorded extensively by historians and travelres, also local Carthaginians of throwing live babies into a fire pit.
Consequently, Roman historical book, as well as rare books, are , and have always been a hot item for Jews. They essentially bought, burned (btw, they started the concept pf book burnings), destroyed, altered, forged all to extinguish their diabolical historical tracks. Essentially, world history as known in the west, and many parts of the world, is re-written to suit Jewish interests and deceit.
Rome fougt two bitter wars with Carthage called the Punic Wars. They hated them so bad, they even salted the earth so they would not settle there again.
With the coming of Christianity, and then Islam, most Jews ended up embracing either of the two. Thus, the ‘Israelites’ and ‘Hebrews’ of the Bible (New) and the Quran of Islam are and have long since gone, but for a minute fragment that scattered with the wind all over.
Interestingly, after Rome, the ‘trail’ goes cold. No Jews in sight. Then an ominous event happened that is promising to be humanities most dangerous and immenent peril.
In the early middle ages, a brutal, nefarious, diabolical people that were phallus worshippers, bandits, pillagers , scorchers of earth called the Khazars resided just north of the Caucus mountians in south-western Russia. They were just terrible, complete with rampant homosexuality, ritual murder ,pedophilia, unleashing raid after raid on the Russ (Slavs-Russians) to the north, and everybody else east, south and west. Just all-out scumbags.
Well, the Arabs sent two separate expeditions to deal with this said scourge. The first one faltered, the second one was successful, but they persisted in their ways. Just a rancid lot.
Finally, the Islamic Golden Horde and together with the Slavic Russ princes, rode on the Khazars and squashed them. The Kingdom of Khazaria was no more, many drifted west into Europe, while some stayed isolated in self-inflicted isolation in what brought us the term ‘ghetto’.
Before the Arab armies and the Russo-Mongol armies, the Khazars had a King who for whatever reason, adopted Talmudic Jewry as the official religion of his people and kingdom. All followed suit. Overnight, the Khazars were Jews. Neo-Jews, or Talmudists. When they were squashed by Muslims and Orthodox Christians, they took their Talmud with them, and all the inherently racist dogma and edicts with that work encompasses.
‘Jews’, then for all intent and purposes lived isolated in ghettos all over Europe and Russia. Then they mysteriously emerged in the 18th century. Igniting world war one due to Jewish debt holdings and their all-out propensity for revolution(to upsurp mankind). Then the world witnessed the gastly horror in the Ukraine-Russia in 36′ and 37′ that saw 7 million die from starvation and malnutrition, all perpetrated by these Jews.
Next, proud, hardworking and honest, faithful Russia fell victim to their nefarious plans for domination and subjugation of non-Talmudic Khazar Jews. They killed Tsar Nicolaus 1, then Tsar Nicolaus 2 and his family, then the real Talmudic gloves came off and the murderous carnage began. First they came for the Orthodox Church. In fact, the very first law made after the Jewsih-Bolshevik revolution as anti-Semitism is punishable by death. 85% off the Bolshevik government was Jewish. The Gulag bosses were Jews. And off went 40-50 million Eurasians (Orthodox and Muslim) to Gulags and perished.
Todays Jews are overwhelmingly of Khazar linage , their outright hatred for Orthodox Christains and true Muslims knows no bounds. They are currently running the affairs of a superpower and trying to use it as a blunt tool of subjugation on the rest of humanity. They are promised by their Talmud that they are promised to live like kings on earth and the rest of us as slaves.
They hate Russia, Putin(who purged the vultures in the 90’s), the Orthodox Church, Islam, Arabs, Persians especially with a satanic zeal. Putin, Russia, her Church, the vast majority of Muslims(Shia and Sunni), Arabs, Persians know this presicely and its actually have a brotherhood of bonds to stand together and defeat this threat. Its happening today in Syria, Lebanon, Yemen etc.
I firmy believe that these Jews ive been talking about have blundered fatally taking on the napping Muslim world and the weakened Eastern Orthodox Russia. And you bet the wise, ancient Chinese know whom the menace is to life, liberty and happiness on earth is.
Sorry, didn’t know I was going to write this much . Peace.
With all due respect, you are rewriting History.
Just to mention a few things:
– You seem to put chronologically the slavery in Egypt after the Purim event. However, the a hebrew kingdom already existed before the Persians conquered Babylon. So the Egyptian slavery could not happen after that event. It puts into question your all story version of the Persian and the Egyptian exile.
– By the time the Khazar elite seems to have converted to Judaism, there were jews in many places, with their traditions and scholars. the Mishna was written the 1st or 2nd century and the Gemara was written in 2 versions in both the Holy land and Babylon around 5 centuries later. Your Kazhar Talmud generation theory lacks evidence.
– Holomodor was in 32-33 and if you want statistics of the percentage of Jews in the Bolshevik institutions, you will find it here, under the section “Jewish involvement in Russian Communism”
– It seems that your last few paragraphs fall into the category that would lead to blacklist you from the comments (according to the new rules of moderation that I just read) as you seem to state that Jews in general are satanic and are a threat that needs to be defeated. I would suggest that instead of firmly believing things that are not correct, you check by yourself that not all Jews are the way you describe them.
There you go making academic-style sense of a volatile subject.
Historical, global hatred leading to genocide and wars.
Truly Biblical and clearly undeniable.
This piece is like a Kalibr missile fired from Russia and exploding the “anti-semite” mythology.
“Two Thousand Years Together” might be the title, Saker, of this Crash Course.
For millions of European Christians, for over 1600 years, the hatred and persecution of Jews was religiously sanctioned. Antisemitism intensified during the l9th and 20th …
Someone should tell this to those people who try to smear Martin Luther as anti-semite. If he may’ve spoken negative about Jews then the sources seem to be his teachers. Since he’s the first Protestant – at least the official person credited to have funded the German Protestant Church – his teachers had to be Catholic. Above quote confirms my assumption that “Luthers anti-semitism” was taught him by Catholics.
Since 12th century Catholicism stand for “nations with wrong religion should be converted if possible or eliminated if not”
Oh? Is that so?
Well explain then why during Luther’s earliest days when being instructed by the Catholics that he was far more sympathetic towards the Jews, even to the point of admonishing some of his fellow Catholics for being bad examples which discouraged Jewish conversion through their poor treatment.
Then long after Luther’s rebellion, he turned around all on his own against the Jews and went far further in his cruelty and hatred against them than the Catholics and Popes he admonished.
This is because Luther, like Mohammed, makes peace and war at his own discretion and convenience. Whatever can achieve his optimal results at the given moment. Hypocracy was as good for Luther towards his opposition as for the Talmud as the Koran. Which all derive from the same source, which ain’t the Catholics they all agree upon to hate equally.
“Someone should tell this to those people who try to smear Martin Luther as anti-semite”
Well , its absolutely true that Luther had catholic teachers.
Also it is true that ressentiment against jews and their religion was mainstream thinking in his times.
But not every catholic priest or monk (Luther was one of them in the beginning) wrote a book like this :
Von den Juden und ihren Lügen
I’ll have to have a look at your link. The intention for my initial comment had been to counter the recent trend to badmouth Martin Luther instead of remembering the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Church. Whilst it’s important not to ignore wrongdoings, at times the criticizing of Martin Luther seems out of proportion.
Several comments further down Jonesy provides us with the important information of the Second Vatican Council (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vatican_Council). So, it took the Catholic Church until 1965 to realize that they shouldn’t have condemned the Jews for such a long time? I never bothered looking for books denouncing Jews for their part in the death of Jesus – who was a Jew himself. If I were looking for such literature, how many books by Catholic Priests or monks would I discover? I’ll definitely not look deeper into this specific question, because it doesn’t matter. Priests of both confessions had been guilty of supporting Nazis in Germany (according to some sources more Protestants than Catholics). The “holier than thou” attitude of people of several confessions and attempts to dominate others is tiresome.
What an amazing and incredible ‘data point’ this is on Homo Sapiens!!!
Intense hatred towards people — which might have risen thousands of years ago in one tiny and arid part of the planet — survives intact until today. Presumably fear bred such hatred. Whereas the simple fact is that peace cannot ever come to the carriers of such fear and hatred.
What to the top ‘anthropologists’ of today have to say about this type of human behaviour?
Oops … (last line) “What do the …..”
‘Anthropological’ studies should not be limited to simple, remote tribes in tropical jungles who do not cause much harm to others.
“Judeophobia has its roots in the demonic teachings of the sect of the Pharisees whose religiously-sanctioned racism has, unfortunately, permeated the worldview of many secular Jews.”
Excellent closing argument! I would add another observation. Even the most kind and loving secular humanists embedded in the Jewish network, never challenge the hateful worldview coming from the Pharisees. Why? Because it would cost them too much in lost opportunities. These normal people do not alter the demonic nature of the collective at all.
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” – Burke
Yes, Gilad Atzmon is a real person, so is Mordechai Vanunu, so was Aaron Russo – but they all became famous due to their extreme rarity. Most good people born into the network – or perhaps better described an an ancient organized crime family – do not forsake their insider birthright, that would be foolish from a rational secular perspective.
To be fair, what is left of supposed western Christendom is no better. The pope is the leader of a satanic pedophile snake cult, just look at his audience hall! Mainline protestants are post Christian modernists, secular in all respects. Evangelicals have become the ideal goyim slaves, worshipers not of a loving living God, but of Israel, and happy to be the mercenaries of the Pharisees. Truly,
Evangelicals are little more than wannabe Jews.
Because of all of this, Western civilization has truly fallen. In a thought experiment, suppose everyone on this planet with any Jewish identification were abducted by aliens, would anything change? No. Secular materialism has buried the west, there is nothing left to save. We all serve Mammon and Moloch, willingly or not. I am not going to suicide, but honestly, I look forward to the end of my earthly existence very much. I absolutely believe in a realm of love and light, and what remains of my life will be devoted to earning my passage to it.
IMHO, Gautam Buddha has found and shown the best resolution ever of the apparent differences between ‘the secular’ and ‘the spiritual’.
I am sorry that you are looking forward to the end of your earthly existence. The realm of love and light is something to look forward to, but we are here on earth on a mission. -And that mission is to tell everyone that who ever believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God, the only Path to salvation, shall not perish, but be granted access to the realm of love and light. -This is a gift of God, thorugh Christ, not somehting that you can earn by your own works. That is actually what the Pharisees and their spiritual decendants, believe; that you earn your way to Heaven. -But the only way to heaven is by accepting the Gift of Christ! And having accepted such percious gift, how can one avoid doing good works out of shear joy?
So, devot yourself to Christ, and not the Pharisaic struggle to earn your passage!
“If the eye is single the body is full of light”
The realm of love and light is accessable here and now if you develop your heart through meditation.
Well said Joy. I deeply share your conclusion
Before discovering your comment I had written some similar lines – in a more simple way and not as sophisticated as your words.
At times this knowledge and the “fight” (like Don Quixote against windmills) maybe tiresome, but this seems to be predetermined. We may be witnessing the world going even more downhill and greed and selfishness rising even more. Nevertheless it’s important to tell as many people as possible – at least those willing to listen – what’s going on.
Tried to convince Gilad to expose Judaism, but he was not willing. Now after pressure from his friends he has done some revelations.
He admits he is part of the the super-structure/super-organism here:
“… forsake their insider birthright, that would be foolish from a rational secular perspective.”
True, hence why our Declaration of Independence is correct when it says that everyone is “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” The “religious” Talmudist “Jews” do not believe in such a Creator, a God which has endowed Rights to all people, anymore than the “secular” “Jews” do. So, of course both varieties, along with any “Gentiles” who don’t truly believe in such a Creator, adopt similar metaphysical perspectives.
“Secular materialism has buried the west, there is nothing left to save… I look forward to the end of my earthly existence very much.”
“And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.”
~ Matthew 24:12-13
Russia and the anti-NWO have been able to defuse the empire’s escalations over the last few years specifically because the clique’s control is slipping. The Armed Forces Tea Party and other Syrian War protests, the Rethink 9/11 movement, the Occupy movement, the Standing Rock protests, the rising popularity of alternative media like the Saker: These all testify to the banksters’ waning power. Take heart and don’t give up, Joy.
These types of people the piece is about , do carry their sense of being the chosen ones openly and proudly. I’ve run into a bunch of those in black clothes in Brussels airport – the feeling they despise everyone not of their like is palpable. They look through you and start angrily speaking in their language spitting on the floor, when you just happen to stand next to them in the line. This was surreal.
And funny, this rebbe is staying behind black notebook on which the word asus is possible to read an it really looks like iesus (aeisus) resemblig greek alphabet.
Haha, these people are not so smart like they like to see themselves.
I see this sign as poweful unintended message.
I remember an ABC (Australian) reporter in Jerusalem, who made the mistake of starting her tape-recorder on the Sabbat. Soon she was being struck by what she thought was rain. Looking up she saw a mob of Orthodox Jewish men spitting on her from above, because they saw her machine working on their Sabbat as an affront.
“Or that the Russians have always, and still are, rejecting the Papacy. Just these two factors will create plenty of russophobia in the West, for sure.”
Significant portion of the “West” have rejected the Papacy as well. Papacy was considered “the Antichrist” throughout Nortwestern Europe during much of the modern era (16-19th centuries). Rejections of the Papacy surely does not explain the Russophobia so prevalent in the Anglo-sphere.
The true reason might not resonate with Saker’s views, but I believe it was very well understood by 19th century’s Slavophiles: Russia is hated simply because it is the only Slavic nation able to stand up against Western European hegemony over the Slavic people. Russia inspired other Slavs to revigorate their cultural identity, and this was sufficient for it to be hated/feared.
And the dominated Irish/Welsh/Scot Celts also originally migrated from those Slavic regions. It seems a systemic prejudice at work.
There are historians who claim that Slavs and Celts are one and the same people, only called by different names. For example, in ancient Britain you had druids who wrote in the cyrillic alphabet. The word “druid” is derived from the Slavic word “drvovid”, which means “he who see’s the trees”. Traditionally a druid is usually seen on a tree branch, or else holding herbs.
Abraham/Ibrahim was a Groveist — Genesis 21:33
For example, in ancient Britain you had druids who wrote in the cyrillic alphabet.
That seems highly unlikely, considering that Cyrillic is derived from Greek, via the Byzantine Empire.
More so, it maybe was created from Greek script by Catholic monks :-D
It also might be interesting that officially history of Russia started when Rurik (Rerok, etc) from destroyed vikings domain came to Russia to set law and order, to be an outside unbiased arbiter between many local power groups who could not trial themselves.
Some says, this heritage extended ancient Germanic/Teutonic vs Vikings feud from nothern Europe into Russia.
And that feud few centuries later reshaped itself itself as many religious wars between Cathlolic Church and Vikings/Irish/Russian/Byzantic Eastern Christianity
We in fact have to go back to the Schism between the Latin and Orthodox churches in 1054. After that the Orthodox Church has always been under attack by the Catholic Church, which could not accept the fact that it could not control the vast areas of Russia, nor could the Orthodox Church accept the fact that the Pope in Rome should assume the role of a new Caesar. Contrary to popular belief, the Catholic (Latin) Church is not the oldest Christian Church in the world, as that honor goes to the Orthodox Church. The Catholic Church is derived from the Orthodox. The first bible was written in Greek, and later on translated into Latin.
“Russia is hated simply because it is the only Slavic nation able to stand up against Western European hegemony over the Slavic people. Russia inspired other Slavs to revigorate their cultural identity, and this was sufficient for it to be hated/feared.”
This feels dear to me, my ancestors are those slavs residing in the strong radiation of german/latin roman phantasies of culture and government of Money living in the Czech/Polish/Saxon borderspace for innumeral generations, raised as a German protestant, now living 36 years in Bavaria’s liberal catholic
south, which is more russophil while the protestant north is more russophobe, see: ‘die Grünen’
The tragic of the former ‘Warschauer Pakt’ Slavs is the inferiority-complex residing in border-spaces see: Ukraine. This inferiority-thing leads to the typical bombast of mignons. Their future might be finally a ‘proud-slavism’ …
My little study about the Jewish evolutionary strategy since Egypt (about 1.000 pages of Kevin Mc. Donald) has to me revealed, that it is the most interesting and most challanging tribe on earth and man’s future leads through or over learning the truth of western mankind as “the chosen” and the ‘snakes’ … It’s
something about our ‘given’. It’s 2000 years of weaving an invisible tribe-relation- net of eccelence and ability and stability.
Mc. Donald tells about the second tragedy of the western Slavs: the jewish minority emerged definitly with a superior abillity to money, busyness, craftsmanship … and was friend of the nobility.
The non-jewish majorities – what else could this human-breed-experiment of the Jewish tribe create amongst the empovered majority in eastern Europe? Talmu-phobia, what else?
Again Russia, the full-breed-Slavs, had the Czar which prohibited, as much as I understood the dominance of the Jewish/Khasars, which hence where the stauchest Czar-haters, hence the mayority in the communist leadership and their executors.
They are a invisible genius given to the planet and a plague. A dear girlfriend of mine remembered a Jewish friend while backpacking in Australia saying: “Yes, it’s so,wherever we come, everywhere are some “of us” who welcome and comfort us travellers, …charity to strangers, a law of Talmud as well as of Zeus, but talmudian is “strictly to those of us” is a heritage of the genius DNA of 2000 years breeding verbal intelligence, individuals are friends with individual Jews, but mankind has to deal with existing invisible Talmudian Jewish community in all it’s power in the west, while the Jewish community seems to have found it’s place in the Russian Civilisation.
It’s about the planetary heritage of a strictly endogam tribe with highest rating of education of ‘their’ children in language and words and meaning, after 2000 years of religious schools, they are an existing net of the
excellent for the chosen-tradition in the world, and all hope is with the yewish dissidents to neutralize them and to the existing Eurasian civilisation to absorb them in their undisturbed cult of endogamy and money.
Tragedy of ‘Warschauer Pakt’ Slavs is indeed the inferiority complex: but it mainly manifests itself in our “elites”. They dream of being part of the West to the point of selling the dignity of our countries and our people.
Typically, instead of putting their talents into development of proud, self-sustained Slavic civilization, they are content with being vasals of the Western Europe, and having huge profits from doing so. In order to justify their behaviour they cultivate utmost contempt for their non-elite coutrymen.
Sadly, these aobminable traits of Western-Slavic elites have become a norm over the centuries.
… the former ‘Warschauer Pakt’ Slavs …
I’ll complete the quoted snippet with: … have been brainwashed by Western MSM in a similar way Germans have been brainwashed by Hollywood and candies distributed by GIs.
Meanwhile the West is used to consumerism, whilst the Slavs want to catch up on something they’ve been longing for their entire life’s.
Excellent article again, dear Saker.
Two things to add:
Do not forget the very powerful force behind, which is using the pharisees for creating these biorobots for their own purposes ( hint… they were tax collectors and slave hunters in the middle ages .. )
Second – the holocausts are always used by these powers again secular, normal, non talmudic jews, when their tool should be ‘sharpened’ from time to time.
Aftrer few generations nobody is seeing the cause and they can rule the world without being notice. But this ended as big Russian prophet Pushkin wrote – zakonvremeni.ru
Also see quite interesting article here about the powers behind — philosophyofmetrics.com
“any people who has been persecuted for two thousand years must be doing something wrong.” Henry Kissinger
“Remember, Jews are not a race or ethnicity, they are a tribe.”
The underlying memes and symbols are not that hidden (if one looks) and can be rather revealing.
Exclusivity, special status, beyond the common law, prejudiced, aggressive and, seemingly in many historical cases, cursed.
Consider the enslavement and attitudes of the Semites (including Arabs) towards the African – based it seems on the strange notion coded in the narrative of Ham. Very convenient for a system of industrial scale slavery. – “And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be the Lord [no caps] God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.”
Well, personally, I think all Africans should take out a global class action against all Jews who do not explicitly reject this fundamental bias. How much misery is justified on this? Just one of many examples.
Btw, the government radio news service (Australia, ABC, 9am, EST) following the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli Prime Minister, in 1995, by Yigal Amir, an Israeli extremist, broadcast a ‘live’ interview with someone in Israel. I heard it walking to work. During this interview the rather emotional spokesman expressed his frustrations and anger and included the fact that it contravened the laws of Moses etc, stating exactly the relevant law: “Thou Shall not Kill … another Jew”. Unable to record this little tribal gem at the time I awaited with expectation and a recording device for the 10am news repeat. Alas the said statement had ‘disappeared’.
I also read somewhere in the distant past that these two tribes (* below) are not considered to be in the House of Israel (as it originally was) – unfortunately I’ve lost the item/links although I do remember conforming the biblical statement existed. Of passing interest, some ‘cut&paste’ quotes are included below (*) – the links are not especially authoritative, but rather simply somewhat accurate and convenient for searching. The general picture is clear for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.
The overall conclusion I come to in this complex domain is: there is an underlying theme of self-serving aggression and violence beneath this tribal paradigm as it exists today, and that the original Israelites read about in the meta-narratives of the Western civilization have long since merged in with the rest of humanity leaving this remnant exclusivist ‘Judas’ cult proclaiming its ‘mission’ and often in convenient cahoots with any other deviant mindset that seeks to justify the ‘more equal than others’ 1% agenda. The divided-and-ruled ‘enemies of your enemies’ are your ‘friends’ (for a convenient while at least). Currents regional trends towards a new Israeli supported emergent Kurdistan can be somewhat aligned with this greater Israel meme.
Recent history shows that tribal policies of ‘exclusivity’ are not peace promoting – and that one does not need to be ‘Jewish’ to be hated and persecuted. As the many Chinese, sometimes referred to as the ‘Jews of Asia’ who died in the mid-1960’s Indonesian purges found out – one does not need to be Jewish to be hated, just have a tribal strangle hold on the local economy. A visit to Vietnam in 2013 indicated to me that this anti-Chinese hatred also exists there on the edge of the once greater civilization and hegemon. It is just humanity-101 at a tribal level. Solving the ‘problem’ is not possible it seems, but keeping the balance is the challenge.
‘Tis Truth that will lead us to freedom – and one truth is that some believe in the view that by deceit it is fundamental to wage war. No doubt it is once war begins, but to apply it (as this video indicates in its introductory @< 11:11 mark) as a basis for avoiding peace is blind and unfortunate. The ‘self-chosen ones’ theme is the fallacy and the virus has clearly infected the north American continent. And, as a post note, why I suspect Hillary Clinton is going ‘insane’ and becoming extremely unpopular with all this anti-Russia nonsense: she is now clearly an ‘unchosen one’.
“After the death of Solomon, the country was divided into two independent kingdoms. The southern region came to be called Judah which consisted of the tribes of Benjamin and Judah. Jerusalem was their capital. The northern region was called Israel which comprised the remaining ten tribes”. http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/culture-miscellaneous/difference-between-israel-and-judah/
“The Tribes of Israel are the traditional divisions of the ancient Jewish people. Biblical tradition holds that the twleve tribes of Israel are descended from the sons and grandsons of the Jewish forefather Jacob and are called "Israel" from Jacob's name given to him by God. The twelve tribes are as follows: Reuben, Simeon, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Benjamin, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Ephraim and Manasseh”. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-twelve-tribes-of-israel
“The ten tribes of the northern kingdom of Israel are: Asher, Dan, Gad, Issachar, Joseph [2 tribes: Ephraim and Manasseh], Naphtali, Reuben, Simeon, Zebulun. The two tribes of the southern kingdom of Judah are: Judah and Benjamin. Note that Levi is not included because they had no set territory but cities of the Levites were scattered throughout the 12 tribes.” https://www.thisisyourbible.com/index.php?page=questions&task=show&mediaid=1489
“The good news for the tribe of Judah and this world is that the “Lion of the tribe of Judah,” Jesus Christ (Revelation 5:5), will return to establish the Kingdom of God, and the tribe of Judah will finally accept its Redeemer (Romans 11:26).” https://lifehopeandtruth.com/prophecy/12-tribes-of-israel/tribe-of-judah/ [note the headline image of the lion]
“When the House of Israel was conquered, most people belonging to the ten Northern tribes were deported and settled elsewhere in the Assyrian kingdom, including places near Nineveh, Haran, and on what is now the Iran-Iraq border. They were replaced by settlers from locations in or near Babylon and Syria. . . . The term "Jew" originated as a way of referring to the people of the southern kingdom of Judah, whether their own tribe was Judah, Benjamin, or Levi. The term appears late in Israel’s history—after the division into northern and southern kingdoms—and it can be fairly claimed that the term does not apply to the members of the ten northern tribes, who are properly known as "Israelites" since they belonged to the House of Israel rather than the House of Judah.” https://www.catholic.com/tract/the-lost-tribes-of-israel
“In the scriptures, Jacob's twelve sons went on to found the Twelve Tribes of Israel and thus the first Israelite nation. Before he died, Jacob gave each son a prophetic blessing, describing them and the fate of their tribe. Of Benjamin, Jacob said: ''Benjamin is a ravenous wolf, devouring the prey in the morning, and dividing the spoil at night.'' It's an interesting blessing; it indicates that Benjamin (and his people) would be fierce warriors. However, the prophesy also made clear that the tribe's existence would be one of perpetual violence, day and night. [Tribal symbol: wolf]” http://study.com/academy/lesson/tribe-of-benjamin-characteristics-symbol-history.html
“Through the tribe of Judah, the lion symbol came to represent the blessing, majesty, and even divine protection of the Jews. . . .The color purple is symbolic of royalty, so Jacob's use of this image further emphasizes the idea that Judah's descendants will be kings.” [note the dress code in tie colors – e.g. Bill Clinton post election etc]. http://study.com/academy/lesson/the-lion-of-the-tribe-of-judah-symbol-meaning.html
Reading of the lion as symbol makes me wonder about many European coats of arms.
…And what became of The Palestine and The Palestinians!?
Ethnicity is based on, but not rooted in biology. Ethnicity is identity loosely defined by birth (or ethnicity of parents). I say loosely because it’s a dynamic concept and can change over time, usually several generations. Ethnic identities themselves are however political constructs, they are are tools of social organization, they are not biological in nature. Russians, people who were united, mostly by force in to state run by foreign invaders from Scandinavia, and which had layer of foreign religion imposed upon them, again, for most part by force by Scandinavian invaders, are prime example of how nations or ethnicities are created (both words mean the same thing, one is just of Latin and other of Greek origin). And they are not exceptional, most nations were created in a very similar way.
I disagree with notion that Jews are religion but not ethnic group. They are ethnic group with religion. These two things does not exclude each other, on contrary, religion is excellent instrument for creating ethnicity. Again, look at Russian ethnicity and Orthodoxy. Or look at Serbs and Croats, people who speak the same language and are for all practical purposes the same …except their religion.
Religion can, under certain circumstances create ethnic identity. And that’s the case of Jews.
Excellent point. Your notion of “ethnicity” fits human societies & cultures quite well.
We wouldn’t even discuss this topic if said tribe didn’t have managed to usurp the world’s money supply, thus allowing it to cast a wide net of monopolies covering most key aspects of humankind’s decision making processes and governance structures.
The gravity of humanity’s situation is is inconspicuously embedded in the seventh Noahide Law:
“Imperative of Legal System”
Sounds fair enough. Until it dawns on you that said tribe will be (and actually already is, or at least pretends to be) prosecutor, jury, judge and executioner exclusively.
Did you know that almost all lawyers, attorneys, etc. in all Western nations are sworn members of the BAR association, a free masonic entity, whose internal regulations mock all common held notions of rhyme & reason? That all BAR members are contracted by banking institutions controlled by said tribe?
The rabbit hole goes deeper than anyone of us could ever have fathomed.
Indeed. See the rebuilt ‘Temple of Jerusalem’… ie: The Supreme Court of Israel, which follows the original temple plans.
It’s not just a question of their beliefs but also their practises. When I was an article clerk, I was at an audit firm where the Partner was a Orthodox Jew as was about 5 other staff members.
I got on very well with them and there were no issues at work and I am still in contact with a couple of them after 12 years. I have no issue with anyone because he is a Jew, Orthodox or otherwise.
When it came to buying food for a function or birthday, they would buy kosher food which we all would eat (very tasty). However, they would cut/ apportion food first for themselves and then the rest of us non-Jews got. If a non-Jew touched the food or cut the food before they did they would not touch it even if it was kosher.
There were two sets of cupboards in the kitchen, two sets of microwaves etc. one for them and one for the rest of us. If a non-Jew (new employee) would mistakenly use one of their cutlery or crockery (not knowing the difference) they would throw it away.
This I found bizarre as there was only one sink and our dishes and their dishes were washed by a non-Jew cleaning lady and but that was Ok.
It is not hard to see how practises like this can lead to resentment.
So do they take common ordinary garden variety vaccinations?
Or do their dominance in the medical domains keep something special for their own while prescribing a mass goy injection program?
Richard Moskowitz’s recent very readable book on the topic clearly shows how messy the and shaky the foundations of this topical mass practice are — e.g. for autism.
Moskowitz, Richard. Vaccines: A Reappraisal (Kindle Location 4). Skyhorse Publishing. Kindle Edition.
Orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews are heavily over-represented in the ranks of slum landlords in the USA, particularly in New York. There, their religious refusal to shake hands with their tenants while inspecting, and more or less ignoring their presence, causes great resentment, even more so than their tendency not to spend money on repairs etc.
There is no specific halakhic (=based on jewish religious law) reason for a jew to serve himself first in order to avoid a non-jew from touching the dish. I don’t know why they did that.
the only reason I can potentially foresee is fear that if someone else had a dish with non kosher food, there could be a some non-kosher dropping in the kosher dish through the serving spoon for example.
the only exception is certain types of wine.
I would suggest that most anti-semitism arises from the Jewish philosophy in relation to money and debt finance which is why the Jews have often been known as Satan’s bankers. Further, any group which runs a debt based financial system, bearing compound interest, is as best sociopathic!
Where is the power of the Jews without their control of the worldwide expanse of privately controlled or privately owned central banks? There is also a phrase I have heard which reflects the sentiments in the above article. ‘It is no crime to swindle a Goy but it is a crime to swindle a Jew.’
In the Wikipedia “Talk” page of the Bernie Madoff article some “editors” were complaining about how the media were identifying him as a Jew, and this was antisemetic.
I pointed out that only only the jewish mentioned that he was Jewish, and they mentioned it because he was ripping off his fellow Jews.
Jews, 2% of the population, commit 25% of ‘major’ financial crime in the USA. Over-achieving, as ever.
The Dueteronomic Paradigm saw religion converted into the organising instrument of faith. The land of Israel has a topography allowing rapid transmission of information by way of signal fires stationed on mountain tops tunning north to south and across the Galilee and from there over the hump to Jerusalem.
They had an optical communication system. The cost of that system was the eradication of worship in the high places and so the ashareh and groves were cut down and Yahweh thereby lost his bride Ishtar the Queen of Heaven. You can prove for example that it is possible to communicate by signal fire between ancient Lakish and Azekar. The placement of many synagogues was such that they acted as relay stations for information transfer like for example the presence of foreign troops. By such means the state could survive and wow its citizens with displays of its prescience. The Dueteronomic Paradigm produced a militant state reinforcing religion.
From the historic point of view, it can be confirmed that Jews, as an ethnic group, really did exist in the Middle East during the Roman Empire and perhaps before it’s creation. It can probably be accepted that a small number of Jews did come to Europe during that period. When the Roman Empire collapsed, the Jews living in the Middle East were assimilated with local populations. Many have pointed out that Palestinians have more Jewish blood in their veins than people living in Israel.
What the article omits to point out, and what history books do not usually teach, is that during the early Middle Ages, a Turkish pagan tribe by the name of Hazars adopted the Hebrew faith, and overnight became Jews. How much of today’s Jewish population is of Hazar origin ?
One product of the Hebrew faith is Zionism, which even many Jews condemn. The English Civil war of the 17th century was provoked by Zionist bankers living in Holland, who used their agent Oliver Cromwell to instigate an armed uprising against King Charles I, who later on was executed. The French Revolution of 1789 was a copy of the English Civil War, and so was the Russian Revolution of 1917, both being financed by Zionist bankers. In the case of the Russian Revolution, Lenin was moved from Switzerland to Russia and Trotsky from New York City to Russia. Both Lenin and Trotsky played the role which Oliver Cromwell had played in England.
The Russian Royal family was not executed by Russians, but by Zionists. When Aleksander Solzhenitsyn pointed out that at least 40 million Russians were exterminated after the Russian Revolution began, he overnight became a liability to the West, which did it’s utmost to forget him, as if he never existed. Much more can be added, but I think this is enough.
Zionism is a modern “ism”.
It’s practical to use the term “Zionist” today to mean “Jew” even he is not Zionist, so as to seem less judeophobic.
But before the end of the 19th century, there was no political zionism. even in Bolshevik Russia, the Jews active in the Revolution were Bolsheviks, not Zionists.
Yep. Jesus knew them well; saying, they were of their father the devil, who was a murderer and liar from the beginning.
In Revelation, He (Jesus) speaks of the throne of Satan being in Pergamum. I now know what he meant. In the book: ‘Rulers of Evil’ by Saussey; Pergamum was deeded to Rome, provided Julius proclaimed himself a god. The title: “Pontifex Maximus” continues to this day and, as Saussey has well researched; Washington DC is the new Imperial Rome, while the Black Pope is the real Pontifex Maximus.
Now I see the nexus between “Israel” and Washington; both liars, both murderers and, consider themselves above any law; dito the Vatican, who employs Rothschild as their banker too.
It’s debatable who employs whom, the Vatican employing the Rothschild’s or the Rothschild’s employing the Vatican. Many have pointed out that the Vatican has for years been under masonic control.
Just a remark on this sentence “the Christians accused them of killing Christ,”, from the simon Wisenthal center.
-Collective guilt doesn’t exist in the christian religion, but I found some sources recently regarding its existence in judaism. So here we had probably some jewish authors from the 19th or 20th century who decided that any past reference to the crucifixion by christian authors was an “accusation” rather than a remark.
I’m not aware that any edict of expulsion accuse the Jews of “killing Christ”
I’m not aware of any medieval Jewish author (eye witness) who complained that the Jews were persecuted because they were accused of “killing the Christ”. Modern Jewish authors, yes, but not during the middle age
I know that the Jewish officials often sought to meet church officials to “debunk” the accusation of blood libel because they were very concerned about pogroms, but prior to 1965 I’m not aware of any such attempt regarding this “Christ killing” stuff.
See also this article from Joseph Sobran: http://www.sobran.com/articles/faction.shtml , he brought solid arguments too. It’s a myth, indeed.
Collective guilt is (or at least was) a concept in Christian faith (at least some of them)
My brother is a Christian of the Society of Saint Pius X (while I am a Jew by choice; what a mixture)…
Reading this made me think of a Jerry Seinfield episode, where they stand by and allow a fat man to be robbed, and then getting arrested for the Good Samaritan Law
There is also the matter of their dominance in certain areas including finance & government. This is rather obvious in America. The US Congress must give homage to Israel. Dual citizens (US-Israel) are found throughout the top positions in government, and Israeli leaders have bragged that They control America. The chairmen of the US central bank, the Federal Reserve, are often Jews. As are many execs in various large international banks. These people hold great power over the American economy & people.
But, just bringing these facts up will bring scorn on ones head. Where lie such dual citizens ultimate loyalties?
We must deal with the truth first, in order to make any progress. We should similarly examine the true nature of Islam, the so-called ‘religion of peace’ that has been doing jihad for 1400 years. There is much evidence that at the core of that political movement is the idea that ‘infidels’ must either convert or die.
Much of humanity lives in a mental fog while wolves are not only scratching at the front door, they’re actually inside the house.
The emergence of the islamic occupations depended on 1. a head-tax and 2. nothing else. A
occupation was not a jihad cause the latter named the fight against enemies of the religion.
Proof: the Spanish-Arabian civilisation which depended on a Syria-type religious freedom.
By any chance is there a transcript of Rabbi David Bar-Hayim’s lecture?
You can go to the youtube menu under the video.
“More” click it.
It produces a English transcript of the captions and time code
You can copy this as the transcript to read.
English (Automatic Captions)
0:06honored to present one of the
0:07outstanding Torah scholars of our
0:09generation the head of mahon Shiloh
0:11which is devoted to the revitalization
0:13of Judaism as a vibrant and relevant
0:17force in the Land of Israel Harel David
0:20Burton has devoted decades towards
0:22expounding a Torah methodology which
0:25promotes truth intellectual honesty and
A fascinating, very well-written, well argumented article.
My question is: Is this all unique to Judaism?
There are other religions that contain questionable passages about idolaters and unbelievers. You said yourself, Saker, that the Koran contains some explicit passages about killing the infidel etc. At the end of the day isn’t it all down to interpretation? That religious texts should not be taken too literally?
I am also puzzled why they call themselves “Jews” as opposed to “Pharisees”. The name does not seem justified since most Jews converted … why did they keep take this name? Is it a way to appropriate the old testament and therefore claim priority over the the Holy Land… Is it it because in the New Testament there are direct references and warnings about Pharisees?
…and why they call their critics antisemites?
The majority among semites are Arabs.
So antisemites are enemies of Arabs – that makes Israel the #1 antisemite state.
Yes, isn’t that strange.
Names are important, so why do they change them? According to Sheikh Imran Hosein it is to hide references to people and events in the religious texts…For example, he claims that the name of Constantinople was changed to Istanbul in order to dissimulate a hadith about the conquest of Constantinople during armageddon.
The Ottomans used the name Istanbul (derived from the Greek ‘εις την Πόλη’ (is tin Poli) which means -to the city/going to the City or towards the City) in order to avoid the name ‘Konstantiniye’ which was prohibited. Sheikh Imran Hossein might be a sympathetic face, but his assertions must be taken with a grain of salt (actually with a cartload of salt).
Semites was a half-baked European word which conflated all the peoples of the Mideast into one supposed race. The idea was pseudo-science.
Anti-semitism got a semi-permanent hold in European languages (hopefully this fever will pass) because of the Dreyfus Affair, 1894-1906. Dreyfus was a Jewish captain in the French Army, the last bastion of traditional conservative Catholics. Dreyfus was wrongly accused of giving the secret of the modern fast-firing cannon to the Germans. This was a major military secret, considering that 3/4 of all WW1 casualties were by artillery fire. Dreyfus was innocent and modern historians think another French captain, whose name they have, sold the secret to the Germans. The Dreyfus affair was orchestrated by Jewish-controlled media (e.g. l’Aurore) to discredit the officer class of the French army and to make Jews more acceptable.
So this is when and where the term anti-semitism was really forged.
Someone once remarked that the Jews are the only people clever enough to make up a special name for outsiders who hate them.
Gilad Atzmon said that in the last 70 or so years, the meaning of anti-semitism has changed, and now it means “people whom Jews hate.” There’s lots of good stuff on that ex-Israeli’s web site, besides his Jazz career. http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/
It was actually early 19th Century German academic musings by the Austrian Steinschneider in 1860
the term antisemitism was created by antisemites (or judeophobes if you prefer).
No the Quran does not contain anything of killing the infidels. That is Jewish propganda through their own Hadith-writers. Ask any Shiya Moslem.
I suggest you read it then. There are several quotes in this direction. You just need to google it.
“Phobia” – extreme, irrational fear.
How much of the extreme, irrational fear felt by Polish peasants in centuries past, or English aristocrats, or Prussian junkers, was “caused” by their deep knowledge of halakhah?
I don’t know how to go about assessing it. Anyone any suggestions?
And how disambiguate the meaning of “cause” applied to mental states such as irrational fear? Is one to say that a perfectly rational analysis of the iniquities of halakhah is the “cause” of the irrational fear?
Someone cleverer than me (not difficult) could further the discussion with a commentary on the article without taking its author away from his more important work – there appear to be several who have occupied themselves with the question of anti-Semitism – and the term is a vital weapon in current politics (as the press coverage of the Labour Party conference here in the UK has just illustrated).
I would be grateful if this request were to appear.
@Lindsay: ‘ “Phobia” — extreme irrational fear’
Thanks for pointing to something that mildly worried me about the Saker’s otherwise excellent proposal to replace the currently confusing term “Anti-Semitic” because the phobia currently displayed by the modern Semitic-speaking Jewish State toward their Semitic-speaking neighbours marks the majority of Jews – both in Israel and abroad – as the most antisemitic people on Earth. The Saker’s term for a Jew-hater, namely “Judeo-phobe” would remove this inconsistency, and sounds well. However, the Latin word for “hate” is “odium”; and “Juda-odeum” does not roll off the tongue so well as Judaeophobia. Nevertheless I feel quite certain that the classical pan-European “antisemitism” of my boyhood (the Hitler years) was an irrational hatred and contempt of Jews (odium) rather than an extreme fear (timor or phobia).
I agree. “Hatred” is better than “fear”.
The question still remains: Was this hatred “caused” by an analysis the haters undertook of Halakhah? Were Polish peasants familiar with Maimonides? I know most English gentlemen would find the whole thing too, too tiresome.
I would suggest something more (infinitely) complex, that possibly includes (certainly in the case of some older generation Christians of various denominations I’ve come across) the canny demonisation of the Jews by early Christians (those who determined that Christianity would not remain a sect within Judaism) keen to exonerate their Roman patrons from killing Jesus (as they, technically, did…).
So many other reasons and causes, surely. I seem to remember the scourge of Orthodox Judaism, Israel Shahak sketching some of the sociology behind the hatred of Polish peasants for estate managers, for example.
@Lindsay. As far as I can tell, you seem to be the only reader who has referred back to the original schism between Pharisaic Judaism and Christian Judaism: between those Jews who executed the blameless rabbi Yeshuah as a troublemaker (same as many Athenians executed Socrates “their wisest man”) on the one side, and on the other side those Jews — and a swelling tide of Goyim — who worshipped the good rabbi as their redeeming “Messiach” (the “anointed one”, Gr. Xristos). So you have gone back 2000 years — far beyond the Mediaeval world of “Maimonides and the Polish peasant”. And yet I think you have not gone back far enough; in order to trace the written source of the mutual hostility between the Chosen People and the “Goyim” (Gr. ethnics) we have to go back another 500 years: to the Babylonian exile, the Babylonian Talmud, and a savagely nationalistic rewriting of the Old Testament which, I suspect, took place during those years of exile and return — centuries before the Romans and the Christians. Jew hatred is the oldest hatred on record — and it works both ways.
On a happier note, the centuries of Jewish stay in sophisticated Babylon and in the tolerant, multicultural empire of Persia witnessed the emergence of a gentle, enlightened strain of Judaism as shown in the sweet story of Ruth, in the charitable morality of Rabbi Hillel of Babylon, and ultimately in the sublime life of Rabbi Yeshuah of Nazareth.
You display more learning than I could pretend to.
My fragmentary recollection of studying classics years ago suggests another instance: in the late Republic and early Empire the Romans objected to the inhabitants of Palestine, as opposed to others under Roman rule, because they refused to play the pagan game of tolerance, so important to civic peace – you worship your gods, so long as you also respect the gods of Rome. Judaism, in this incarnation, was already a religion, as Christianity and Islam, its later descendants, which could not countenance such an easy-osy attitude to divinity and could not easily co-exist with competing faiths. This was, I believe, more or less unique at the time within the Roman world, and set Judaism apart – but the cause of any wry attitude towards Jews on religious grounds was not specifically because of the detail of doctrine about goyim, And it was not something Christians or Muslims could justifiably use in retrospect as a reason for hatred.
The reasons for non-Jews to hate Jews appear to be many and varied through history – and few, if any, have anything to do with the doctrines that emerged as orthodoxy in the middle ages, and few seem sufficient for the virulence of the hatred, other than, among Christians, the belief that one sect of 1st century Jews was complicit in the execution, not of a Rabbi dangerous to their ascendancy and to social order, but of the very Son of God (in the Christian sense) – which again has nothing to do with Halakhah.
Orthodox Judaism appears (I say from the depths of my ignorance on the subject) abhorrent beliefs arising from the putative uniqueness of God’s Chosen People (something certain Protestants and Dissenters and such were happy to appropriate in one form or another), but this does not appear to be the explanation for Jew-hatred among Christians.
@Lindsay. We are saying the same thing. You point back to bad relations between Jews and Romans/Christians due to an unusually “stiff-necked” streak of nationalistic chauvinism in amongst the inhabitants of Roman Judea. I point back to the emergence of this Jewish chauvinism even earlier. When the tolerant, multicultural “Law of the Medes and the Persians” allowed exiled Babylonian Jews to return to their “ancestral homeland” in Judea (and why not?), the first thing the returning Jews did was to forget all they had learnt about multiculturalism and tolerance; they kicked out all the ethnic Goyim, and forced divorce on every Jewish man who had married a Shiksa wife. So the two-edged sword of ethnic prejudice and mutual bad feeling was already forged, long before Romans and Xtians appeared on the Stage of History.
We are indeed, although I am learning more from you than you from me.
The main point surely is that there is a long history and not all of the hatred has anything to do with the specifics of Judaism, indeed I suspect very little – not many took the trouble to learn Hebrew and study the texts.
The virulence of the hatred is not explained by their noxious beliefs.
I suspect another part of the organic hostility resides in the deep connections between the Christian narrative (and framework) and its Egyptian roots. Credit to Gurdjieff for the clear links to the ancient systems of the Nile whence the said ‘JC’ spent much of his life.
Is this David Bar-Hayim representative for Judaism in general? It seems he is criticising other Rabbis quite a bit.
Re. your “there are many Jews out there (most, I would say) who are totally unaware of all this. Even “Conservative” and “Reform” synagogues don’t preach that too overtly (though sometimes even they do).”:
But that makes no sense at all, because the Torah, the Pentateuch, the first five books in the Christian Bible, are heavily loaded with that racism — it doesn’t come from that rabbi who is living and teaching today; it comes from the foundational Scripture of Judaism. And even in the New Testament, Jesus is referred to several times in the canonical four Gospel accounts of him as being not only a “teacher” but specifically as a rabbi — a teacher of Judaism (a teacher of the Torah). So, Jesus himself taught that. It’s part of Christianity too.
On this you are right that Jesus was probably only teaching for the Jews and Saul heavily influenced the initial direction of christianism to make it “universal”, but there is no way to know how Jesus was seeing the gentiles except if one believes the story of the roman centurion in luc 7, 1-10. Anyway, I still love the philosophy of Jesus & Saul combined even after turning agnostic
But that makes no sense at all, because the Torah, the Pentateuch, the first five books in the Christian Bible, are heavily loaded with that racism — it doesn’t come from that rabbi who is living and teaching today; it comes from the foundational Scripture of Judaism.
Yes, it has nothing to with Talmudic Jews. It has to do with Old Testament, which is part and parcel of the Bible.
By accepting that Old Testament is the True Word of the Father, we Christians are in the pickle now.
And even in the New Testament, Jesus is referred to several times in the canonical four Gospel accounts of him as being not only a “teacher” but specifically as a rabbi — a teacher of Judaism (a teacher of the Torah). So, Jesus himself taught that. It’s part of Christianity too.
Part of the Old Testament is still taught nowadays, but the main focus is on the New Testament. The overall message of Jesus is to live a peaceable life and to love your enemy (Matthew 5:43-48 and Luke 6:27-36). Even when he suffered at the hands of his enemies he didn’t use his power or call for a violent uprising.
Trying to prove that this talmudic culture is a wrong interpretation of the old testament is meaningless as you will find as many doctors as you want, to prove the contrary.
What is interesting is what they claim even if I don’t like it being not part of the tribe.
What disturb me more is this habit of hiding oneself behind scriptures. This is common to the Jews, the Christians and the Muslims scholars.
One should talk according to what his soul is telling him, the reference to some scripture is not a proof that what you say is right or true. Men have written those books which are at their images, a mixture of truths, errors and lies.
This perpetual reference to a book (old or new testament or Coran) gives the impression that people are more interested to be a good member of a community holding for holy such a book than opening oneself to the real God not the one depict in that book.
It is not by knowing thoses books and being able to quote any passage that you will have a better understanding of God, and the nature of the relation to have with Him, and how to meet what you are expected to do
Add to this fact that Jesusneverexisted (.com), we have a mess to sort through.
Plenty of history discussed at that site, albeit in a cynical tone; but the short summary is that:
1 Earliest documented copies of the NT and Christian “Bible”, are those commissioned by Constantine Post-Nicea. Nothing in the 1stCE. Some references in late 2ndCE and beyond actually refer to a “CHRESTUS” ( meaning “good”, “useful”); and it was this CHRESTUS Cult that Constantine favored and “reformulated” with other Regional Religions (Dionysus, Zeus, Jewish Messiah hijacked for History and Future Hopium).
2 Anno Domino was defined by a Monk in the 6thCE. Backdated for convenience. THAT’S why there were no documentation regarding Jesus or his Christians prior to Nicea (4thCE).
It is painful to see the non-sense of Jesusneverexisted still peddled even after it was completely consigned to the dustbin of history. But there are people incapable to ever learn.
IMO you missed the main point, touched in an old Scott Humor article, in which Valery Pyakin said:
“Historically, Jews served as an instrument of the political world management.”
In other words, Jews played major roles planning major globalizing movements, erosion of national identities, reduction of nation-state status, and in consequence slow-motion national genocides. Jews and similar species of self-anointed “chosenites” run the games.
I tried to explain to my friends at Daily Stomer Dr Sand’s idea that modern Jews are a kind of convenient fictional assumed identity used by globalizers, but they don’t seem to get it. Any kind of parasitic entity needs a cover.
Two things sir: One is I detest the over and incorrect usage of the word “phobia” and you being a wordsmith should avoid it. A phobia is “an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something” it is pathological and categorized as such in the DSM. Simply because I do not like the practice of homosexuality for example, in no way implies I am “homophobic” and because I do not like what the Jews have done and are doing in the world in no way makes me “judeophobic.” The use of the word in the contemporary sense is ad hominem in nature–a tool for those whose positions do not have a leg to stand on.
The second and related is my dislike of the Jews is based on logic not fear. How can such a small tribe have such a disproportionately deleterious effect on the whole world? They control our financial sector, our media and our entertainment industry etc. That is why I dislike–not fear them them.
The definition of semitic is “relating to or denoting a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic and certain ancient languages such as Phoenician and Akkadian, constituting the main subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family.” So being anti-semitic would include disliking most people from the Middle East. The destruction of precision in language in one tool being used in the destruction of Western civilization.
I think that’s a fair point, if only to us pedants. (I am still trying to get my thoughts together on the Saker’s thesis). My ex is a psychologist and has often had to explain to me that I need to distinguish between rational and irrational fears. It is quite normal to fear snakes – a healthy fear of snakes is not a phobia as many snakes are dangerous and pausing to work out whether we should or should not be scared when discovering one could be a life threatening error. A strong fear of the drawing of a snake would likely be a phobia however – an irrational fear, or Ophidiophobia. If Talmudists (sp?) mean us ill then not liking or fearing them is hardly irrational. I need to think about the above thesis but will now be mindful of Tulmudread…..
To equate dislike with fear–or the other favorite word of the left “hate” is deliberate and only designed to shut the conversation down and avoid the issue–nothing to do with pedantry. When you can’t address the issue attack the speaker.
Bruce – I believe I was agreeing with you, though I should have perhaps been clearer. We agree on the use of the word phobia by psychologists to mean an irrational fear. Phobia is also used by the general public to also mean an intense fear. The use of the word irrational in the clinical sense is key here.
Consider the following – “There is much anti-Russia sentiment in the US at the moment, some of which is Russophobic.” This says that many people in the US are against Russia (as many of us naturally are of anything which we don’t understand) but that some people have an hysterical fear of Russia which is disproportionate to the cause. Most would say the hysterical fear is irrational as the US actually has very little genuine reason to fear Russia, so the word Russophobia is being used correctly in the clinical sense to mean an exaggerated reaction that has no rational basis.
If I understand correctly, the Saker has tried to spell out in detail a religious basis for why some Jews believe themselves superior to all others and why they would therefore treat others in ways that many people would find abhorrent. (It is the antithesis of “All men are created equal”). My point is that there would be nothing irrational about developing a range of adverse reactions (e.g. wariness, mistrust, dislike, fear, possibly even as far as hatred) based on the amount of evidence/experience you gathered for that – i.e. if your reaction was proportionate to magnitude of the ill that you faced as a consequence. I therefore do not like the use of the word judeophobia in this article as it says (at least to psychologists) that this fear is irrational – i.e. that the person experiencing it is the one who has the problem! The whole point of the Saker’s argument is the opposite.
Your essay is irrelevant because zionism is a late C19th racist imperialist and antisemite ideology. The Jewish antecedents of modern Judaism in all its many forms are not the point. The point is that Judiaism is insignificant and that is what makes it a convenient fig-leaf for these common criminals, these squatters, these Johnny-come-lately C20th conquistadors, whose existence suits the convenience of American Caesar. It’s a waste of time to create a meta-theory of modern antisemitism when the existence of a zionist antisemite colony in Palestine is no more than an imperial boil, which will pop when American Caesar has taken his fill of the benefits that the colonists have created.
Article pinned it on the head. When someone publicly proclaims themselves as the greatest on earth, the best, chosen by “god” while all the rest are trash, and then perpetuate it through a quasi-religious passdown – it sets the stage for a neverending conflict. Judaism is closer to a cult than a religion, as it perpetuates an apartheid stance. Similar to Hitler’s glorification of an Aryan master race.
I would argue that using the word “tribe” to paint the Jews/Judaism is a misnomer. The word “tribe” can equally be applied to the Abrahamic groups, namely Muslims and Christians. While both have varying degree of tolerance (i.e. secularism), it’s undeniable that both will react to “tribal” conflicts that spans borders and races. The Jews/Judaism aren’t unique in this aspect.
Antagonistic core philosophies aside, ancillary factors should not be easily dismissed. The cult, for generations, has its hands deep in the money market. One could argue whether this was a virtual or even a minor monopoly, however to maintain the family business – it means involvement in large scale intrigues and eventual move towards an organized “crime” status. This is where the cult morphs into a mafia.
On Jews pretending to be “surprised” towards the avalanche of anti-semitic sentiments, stop and pause for a second to reflect. These sentiments arise from diverse racial background, religions and countries; it’s really unprecendented when Christians or Muslims (who are usually at each other’s throat) or even others generally view the Jews negatively. It’s even more bizarre as this hate spans centuries! It was rather ironic to see the snake being attributed to a non-Jew, when usually it’s the other way around.
They don’t get this much hate for nothing. There’s a reason.
Most importantly however, not every Jews are into this mafia business, the same as not every Muslim subscribe to the narrow-minded extremist mistranslation of Islam. This is where common-sense comes in. The ability to form a rational judgement and differentiate between rights and wrongs with respect*
P.S. May not apply to kids, liberals, nazis, narcissists, psychopaths, philistines, cultists, extremists and imbeciles ;)
Sturm on September 28, 2017 · at 3:07 pm UTC
Article pinned it on the head. When someone publicly proclaims themselves as the greatest on earth, the best, chosen by “god” while all the rest are trash, and then perpetuate it through a quasi-religious passdown – it sets the stage for a neverending conflict. Judaism is closer to a cult than a religion, as it perpetuates an apartheid stance. Similar to Hitler’s glorification of an Aryan master race.
Yes, the Old Testament is True and Pure Word of the Father, which is accepted by us Christians….
On Jews pretending to be “surprised” towards the avalanche of anti-semitic sentiments, stop and pause for a second to reflect. These sentiments arise from diverse racial background, religions and countries; it’s really unprecendented when Christians or Muslims (who are usually at each other’s throat) or even others generally view the Jews negatively. It’s even more bizarre as this hate spans centuries! It was rather ironic to see the snake being attributed to a non-Jew, when usually it’s the other way around.
Yes, non-Jews as just as capable, if not more capable of being snakes as Jews,
(The rest was removed.Do not insult other posters.MOD)
1) There is no any blood-related tribe of Jews. There probably was back then, but no more. Galakha laws plus dispersion ensured Jews to intertwine with local ethnicities all around the world. So, there are Maroons (black Jews), there are Sephards, there are Ashkenasee, there are Asian Jews and everything. But blood-wise they probably have more in common with local populations than other ex-Jew tribes.
2) It is interested to notice how the “come to the conclusion that “all Jews” are bad” mechanics were noted by Her Majesty services and artificially replayed, by creating Wakhabi sect and states, and then expanding universal repulsion to Wakhabism onto all the Muslims around.
3) Catholicism notion that “peoples with wrong religions should be exterminated unless they convert” comes very close. Catholics historic practice of “exploring” ocean Islands and Americas is maybe non-distinguishable.
4) one can argue than many secular ideologies – be it Bolshevism, Maoizm, Nazism, modern american Exceptionalism, also come very close to the same “we are more precious than others” belief.
” Catholicism notion that “peoples with wrong religions should be exterminated unless they convert”
There was never such thing in catholicism. Even in Spain, during the “ethnic purification” of 1492, the Jews were ordered to either convert or QUIT. And you wouldn’t have millions of Jews living/surviving in Europe during 2,000 years elsewhere if it was true. The catholic doctrine was hegemonic, proselytising to swallow and digest everything around . You mix the behaviour of people born into that religion with the religion itself.
>> ” Catholicism notion that “peoples with wrong religions should be exterminated unless they convert”
> There was never such thing in catholicism.
This notion not only exists – rationalizing it is enough to make the person new Saint
From http://thesaker.is/how-russia-should-deal-with-the-pilban-syndrome-pbs/ discussion
> Bernard of Clairvaux (Latin: Bernardus Claraevallensis), O.Cist (1090 – 20 August 1153) Canonized 18 January 1174
Not 1000 years ago i admit, a bit less.
The driving force behind anti-Slavic pan-European war.
> The title Doctor Mellifluus refers to Bernard as one whose teaching “is as sweet as honey”
Yep, pledging wars against Slavs was always “sweet as honey”, i can only wholeheartedly agree.
This was one of the many Catholic Crusades against Byzantium Christianity, that culminated in destruction of Constantinopole and had echoes as far as trading Ireland people for slaves.
> The opposition to Anacletus expressed itself in the invention and dissemination of the most slanderous reports concerning him. Bernard of Clairvaux, who was the most zealous supporter of Innocent in France, quite naturally poured forth his indignation in a vehement epistle to Lothaire, to the effect that “to the shame of Christ a man of Jewish origin was come to occupy the chair of St. Peter.”
What a bright man! Christianity can never embrace Jews and should ditch them out, starting with Christ themselves or maybe even with Moses?…
But maybe this was a random fluctuation?
> …with the pagans, until “either the religion or the nation be wiped out (Lat. aut ritus ipse, aut natio deleatur)” [Bernardus abbas Claravallensis, “Epistolae,”
The nation should be enslaved or, if enslavement is not possible, totally genocided.
Really, what is there in Catholicism not to like, if they called to genocide of wrong nations when it was almost 1000 years until Hitler?
@There is no any blood-related tribe of Jews
Except those who call themselves “Jews” and marry only their blood related fellow ‘Jews’.
At any time in Human History, ambitious ammoral (a word that doesn’t mean ‘immoral’) types look for an elite ‘tribe within a tribe’ to join, a powerful minority that never directly provides the ‘kings’ but seeks to be the ‘power behind the throne’. In our age, in the West this powerful minority goes by the name of ‘jews’.
Are all members of this tribe ‘successful’ – of course not, and this ain’t a counter argument to the power and influence of the tribe. And while this tribe claims an ancient ‘heritage’, this is just laughable fantasy mythology as seen with the masonic types as well.
Do you know ‘The Saint’ books? Well they were written by a Brit who was banned from the USA under laws that denied entry to anyone with ‘asian genes’ (I couldn’t believe this fact when I read it- but its true and many powerful jewish americans stood behind this racist law as well as those against ‘black’ people). Anyway my point is that while people know ‘The Saint’ from Roger Moore’s famous TV show of the 1960s, the stories date back to before WW2- and thus had themes covering the author’s views about who was really responsible for the war.
In editions of the Saint stories published long after WW2, the author was forced to ‘apologise’ to his readers for the ‘anti-semetic’ content! What was that content? Simply the observation of people in the 1930s that ***bankers*** were funding all the leading fascists and their movements. And this observation was completely factual. But after the war the truth became ‘anti-semetic’ even when the author never even used the word ‘jews’.
But here’s another fact for you. After WW2, at the infamous Nuremberg trials that failed to prosecute ***Allied*** war criminals as well, there were two very controversial nazis on trial. One was the leader of the u-boat division that successful sank so many Allied ships via submarine warfare. One was the banker who single handedly ensured the finance of the nazi machine. Now the first clearly operated under the rules of war and did nothing that the allied forces did not do in their ocean warfare. His conviction and execution disgusted many on the anti-nazi side. The banker was infinitely more culpable and not protected by any rule of war. But his jewish banker mates insisted he be found “not guilty”, so he walked and enjoyed a post war career in the company of fellow ‘tribe’ bankers that most certainly had bankrolled the worst fascists pre-ww2.
The author of ‘The Saint’ books knew all this, but all his post WW2 success was down to jewish publishers and jewish media moguls, like Lew Grade- so he ‘apologised’ for daring to have had opinions in the pre-WW2 Saint stories thatwere true to history, but ‘awkward’ knowledge after WW2.
Anyone as I said at the top, in the Human control ecosystem, there is always a tribe occupying the position held by ‘jews’ today. It is a systemic weakness of Human control systems, because being ‘the power behind the throne’ is always a much more stable powerbase than being part of the group with ambitions to sit on the throne. It is why jews don’t become presidents in the USA.
Today the jews control the mainstream media and fake alternative media to a 99% degree. So yesterday when the Saudi King, responding to Saudi’s failed project in Syria, announced that some women might be able to drive in KSA under certain situations, the jewish mainstream media erupted in a combined scream of praise – rather like praising the slave owner who only whips his slaves on Sunday, and only rapes his slaves once they reach the age of thirteen.
Freedom on Conscience, a Right that in its modern version is wholly a British gift to Humanity, even as today Blairite forces in Britian deny that right to the children of all but white middle class Brits, means that a person’s religious and spititual beliefs are theirs to define and choose, without any interference from the state. So we can all agree that a person is as entitled to call themselves ‘jewish’ for any and all reasons- talmudic, secular, old testament, ‘genetic’, ‘ethnic’ – whatever. If the reason is delusional- well that’s the whole intent of Freedon of Conscience- who are we to judge.
But- and it is the biggest but in the world- if jews choose to work together for an agenda that is against anybody, people have a right to object loudly, and spread warning of that conspiratorial behaviour. Freedom of Conscience does not include the ‘right’ to be beyond criticism for the ‘exercise’ of one’s beliefs when the exercise of those beliefs impacts the rights of others. And this fact is constantly mis-stated,especially by jewish power groups who tell us that jews must never be criticised or acted against.
Any group should be criticised or acted against when that group uses power to hurt others. In the USA the jewish lobby is currently trying to criminalise the BDS movement, and almost every powerful jew in America wants the Constitution over-turned when it comes to organised boycotts against the sick racism of the jewish state of Israel. But then again the jews of America delight in the fact that 100% of the US Congress, including Ron and Rand Paul, bloc vote in favour of support for Israel when Israel is engaged in holocaust against Gaza or Lebanon or the West Bank. The jewish take-over of the USA, warned about by a number of the ‘Founding Fathers’ is complete.
Being ‘the power behind the throne’ has a singular logic. ‘Littlefinger’ in ‘Game of Thrones’ was a metaphor for the jewish powerbase in the West. People who feel sorry for themselves. People who feel entitled. People with a chip on their shoulder. People who know how the right word in the right ear can reap such astonishing rewards.
I believe in ‘live and let live’. It sickens me when people attack actors like Tom Cruise for being a ‘scientologist’ for instance. Who cares how nutty a ‘religion’ is- and they don’t come more nutty than those that belong to the judaic tree. People can sorta hold any nutty belief and still be good. But when people use ‘religion’ as a means to work together in Common Purpose to get one over on those they define as ‘lesser’- well excuse me for being far from happy.
Take today. The kurds are seen as a useful bulwark against the russian and iranian projects in Iraq and Syria so what happens- The West’s major jewish groups all push for kurdish ‘independence’- and that push directly murders brave Russians currently in Syria trying to bring peace.
One last fact. During the final worst days of Apartheid in South Africa, the jewish groups of the West were the last remaining powerbases supporting the ‘white’ regime. This got so very bad, the jewish state of Israel provided the sick racist regime of South Africa with nuclear warheads, biological weapons, and Israel specialists who deployed the biological weapons against ‘black’ rebels in neighbouring Africa nations. For instance, Israeli military scientists soaked clothes in biological agents and left bundles of these clothes in regions were the locals would discover them and gratefully use them. If you are interested, there are several books published carefully detailing the horrifying Crimes Against Humanity carried out by the self described ***jewish*** government of Israel in South Africa. These reports are no fantasies or ‘anti-semetic’ slanders. The worst racists in Israel (and that’s saying something considering the competition) are always promoted to leading positions in the Israeli government and armed forces that have to do with murdering the ‘goyim’.
And before anyone says “well look at how many white christians in the UK and US administration did similar terrible things” I’ll ask “who ever tries to portray rightful attacks on those people as ‘racism'”? There can be no excuse for the existence of Israel in its religious racist form- none. There can be no excuse for lionising the mass murdering terrorist jews who helped form the modern state of Israel. There can be no excuse for anyone who seeks to defend any of the near infinte crimes of the ‘jewish state’.
It is funny that Israel’s main defender is America- yet America and Israel are the exact polar opposites. America is great in the idea that it is a land where all are welcome, regardless of circumstance of birth or religious belief, so long as the newcomer commits to being an American first. Israel, on the other hand, states that ‘jews are the master race’ and all jews are welcome to Israel so long as they commit themselves to eventually ‘eliminating’ the ‘sub-Human’ non-jews in the locality.
Think I express this a little too clearly. Well a couple of years ago a court in Israel sent a man to prison for ‘rape’. The sentence was upheld by Israel’s highest court. Want the details? The man was a ‘sub-human’ non-jew. The woman a jew. Both adults. The sex was consentual and ‘conventional. So ‘rape’? Well the woman claimed one day that she had discovered her partner was a non-jew but he had told her originally he was ‘jewish’. Rather like in the USA in 1850, a jewish prosecutor in court would successfully argue that the ‘black’ ‘sub-Human’ who had consentual sex with the white woman, because the white woman thought the man was also white because of his very ‘light’ complexion, had ‘in reality’ raped her.
So Israel applies 1850 slave trial ‘logic’ to the definition of ‘rape’. The very evil judgement of the Israeli court was so egregeous, it actually got a little negative coverage in the more ‘liberal’ newspapers of Britain and Europe, But jewish spokepeople in Britain appeared on TV and in print to ‘explain’ and justify the rape conviction, and the disgusting story was soon forgotten.
I hate Israel with every fibre of my being, but facts inform my opinion, not predudice.
While one can argue whether or not Jews are a “race”, nobody can seriously argue that they are not a “nation” in the traditional sense of the term. “A people who share common customs, origins, history, and frequently language; a nationality”.
If Jews are a nation, then one must always consider any self-identified Jew as a member of a foreign nation and treat them accordingly. It is insane that any Gentile people would allow foreigners to occupy powerful positions within their government or to allow Jews to own/control important national institutions such as mass media, education, etc. Jews are not inherently evil, they are quite simply foreigners within our midst whom we have mistakenly given political and economic rights to. The solution, IMHO, is to reverse this mistake and return to treating Jews as members of a foreign nation and severely restricting their political and economic activities within Gentile nations.
By “Jews” I mean anyone who self-identifies as a Jew, anyone who was educated as a Jew, anyone who has ever supported Jewish organizations or the Israeli state. Someone who has Jewish ancestry, but does not self-identify as a Jew, does not raise their children to be Jews and has not engaged in supporting organized Jewish groups is not a problem for a Gentile society. But then they are not a problem, because they are not Jews…So for all practical purposes, it is the Jews…
Wow, excellent. I really enjoyed this article very much. Thank you.
I think it would be more useful if put into a historical context. But that would require a lot more space.
But someone has done that. Israel Shahak, “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.” The book is not that long, though. Can be read in one or two sittings. Also the notes are interesting.
Shahak completely destroys the ahistorical concept of anti-semitism and also of Judaism, and explicates the role played by Jews in historical context where rabbis and other powerful Jewish figures aligned themselves with Gentile elites, to oppress not only serfs but their own Jewish communities. Shahak calls rabbinicalJudaism by whatever name (Pharisee-ism) a totalitarian belief and social system and shows why, and how it operated and increasingly does so again in Israel today. The hapless Jews could not be freed from within but had to be freed from without, via the gradual penetration of Enlightenment ideas. Rabbis had total power, and could order breakers of the to be, say, flogged to death. Say, adulturers. Or one who lay with a Gentile woman (BTW, *all* of the latter were whores/unclean/beasts/ etc.)
Shahak also deconstructs the importance/role of mendacity/deceit/lying in the belief system that the Saker somewhat dissects (but this can go much further). Briefly, it is OK to lie to a Gentile. It is also OK to lie to God!! If needed to “get around things.” Shahak also shows how these beliefs and convictions toward Gentiles affect the Israeli stance toward the Palestinians, their property, and their land (of course, per Israelis all lands within Greater Israel belong to them, not to their previous owners, and it is A-OK to steal Gentiles’ property or “acquire” it in one way or another).
Very interesting essay. My main objection is that I doubt 1 person in 100,000 or more across the centuries in Europe, and up to the present, knew anything about the Talmud, or even knew the word. In the Christian world, at any rate, the reasons for “judeophobia” are evident. The Simon Wiesenthal Center quoted has it exactly right. It is a sufficient and evident explanation: “The emergence of Christianity as the dominant religion in Europe intensified the persecution of Jews. Since both the religious and political life of Europe became organized around the Christian faith, Jews were seen as outcasts, the deniers and “killers” of Christ. For millions of European Christians, for over 1600 years, the hatred and persecution of Jews was religiously sanctioned.”
For this reason, Jews in Europe have had a rather dissolving effect in the West, which in any case, and unlike the Eastern Christians, betrayed the culture of Christendom in the Renaissance, and definitively during the Enlightenment. The profound spirit of Christianity is still found at Mt. Athos.
I would say that Christ never literally repudiated Judaism, or rather the Mosaic revelation. Otherwise Christ would never have said, “they sit in Moses’ seat.” In other words, contemporary, deviated, Judaism was one thing in his eyes, and the eternally valid and spiritual aspect of the Mosaic revelation was another. This gets into very subtle territory, best left to sages.
In the Islamic world, the Jews often prospered, and at any rate, they were tolerated as “people of the Book.” This shows that in the Islamic view, the Mosaic revelation is considered a revelation. All the Prophets are revered in Islam.
Certainly, men differ widely in their intelligence, and this applies also to religious thinking and spiritual contemplativity. Not all Jews are and were literalists. It is impossible that the more spiritual among them did not understood the universality of “Have we not all one Father? hath not one God created us?” Similarly in Islam, one thing is a literalist and purely legalist Asharite, and another is a profoundly contemplative and spiritual Sufi saint. In any case, the Quran states, in Sura al-Ma’ida that if God had so willed He would have made mankind into one community, but instead, to each He has given them their religion. Hence men should compete in virtue, and in the next life God will “inform you about that over which you used to differ.” By the way, the more intelligent and spiritual among the Native Americans thought the same: “The Great Spirit has given us our religion and to you your religion.”
In one of your paragraphs you suggest that Islam was more tolerant for Jews than christianism. May I remind you that two common reasons that were used to justify the expulsion of the Jews were
Since the talmud was written in the second century there is no reference to Mohamad, he is certanly not supposed to boil in his own excrements and there is no recommandation to spit in front of a church or a christian graveyard (unlike for christianism if I remember well Israel Shahak). So here #1 hardly happened in Islam,. as for #2 muslims have (theorically) a total ban on usury for anybody while the catholic church only outlawed it for catholics
I don’t know much about Jews and Muslims living together in the past, but I’ve heard and seen several accounts of Christians and Muslims living together. Whenever Muslims conquered some area, they permitted the conquered to keep their faith. As far as I know there were only two conditions. The first was that icons in churches (depictions of people) were made irrecognizable. You can still find churches with clearly visible depictions of people in the form of mosaic display. Only the faces had to be reworked. The second aspect seems to be some monetary tribute that had to be paid to the conqueror.
Well, … with the newly created “Clash of Civilizations” all the historical knowledge seems to be something of the past. Instead of highlighting the mutually shared aspect that Islam, Judaism and Christianity are based on the Old Testament (which includes The Ten Commandments), divisions are deepened by “experts” shown on MSM.
The entire series of Europa The Last Battle is very important; Chapter 1 is a ‘Must Read’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJ0soqQPl5A&t=2s
The Bolshevik slaughters should explain “anti-semitism” and they’re only part of the picture:
Europa The Last Battle, Chapter 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJ0soqQPl5A&t=2s
If you really want to understand Jews and antisemitism, you need to read Professor MacDonald’s trilogy:
It is by far the most thorough study of the Jews to date. The above explanation of the causes of antisemitism is just scratching the surface. Having said that, it is a very complex topic.
Incidentally, one of the key concepts you reference but don’t define is moral universalism vs moral particularism. The latter is the teaching of Islam and Judaism, the former the current teaching of Catholicism.
Apologies, I failed to explain the concept of moral particularism vs moral universalism. Under the former morality, the world is divided into two groups, an ‘in group’, which fellow members of the in group need to treat ‘well’, and an ‘out group’, who do not have to be treated well and, perhaps, can be treated very badly indeed.
Under moral universalism, everyone needs to be treated “well”. Theologically, this is the case under current Christianity. Prior to Vatican II (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vatican_Council), this was not the case with respect to the Jews under Catholic teachings, hence, partly, the reason for mutual animosity between the two groups.
I only can accord, Mc Donald is the painstaking author of the trilogy of the Jewish “People -That- Shall – Dwell-Alone”
I read the third volume when I recovered from stroke, I couldn’t stop, his work a deeply human endeveour.
Nice piece by Saker the Wise!
Since US exceptionalism or supremacy = NAZI Übermensch = the chosen ones, the question remains:
Are all nations mad or just Zionist controlled ones?
Great article and wonderful to hear someone mention Michael Hoffman, an excellent writer whose work is too little known. His latest work, “The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome” shows the amazing infiltration of Kabbalah inspired occultists into the Roman church from the late 1400’s.
This whole “chosen people” meme is nothing more than “master race” theory. I know Jews are not a race but call it a “master tribe” then. Do some think they are superior and hence worth more than other humans? Does that sound familiar? The previous master races of Germany and Japan thought so too.
History is littered with examples of those who subscribed to the “master race” philosophy and All of them have been decimated. Do some people want their tribe decimated? I don’t.
You probably have been told that “this time it’s different” because you are so much smarter than all the other “master races”. Those are 4 very expensive words to accept. The cost is paid in blood of the master race. The previous master races all thought the same thing.
History repeats for those who don’t learn from it.
Most importantly is the fact that your god said this. Can you prove your god exists? No you can’t, nor can anyone else prove theirs does. So you are risking decimation (again) by ignoring history, basing your behaviour on an unproven god and a belief that “this time it’s different”?
Some of your post has had to be amended – please could you focus your comments on Saker’s article rather than talking at individuals who may not be around to answer your questions. Mod
Understood. Thank you for publishing my comment. This was an angle that I feel the Saker did not cover in his article.
I do not want to see another group go down the master race path. If I don’t warn them then who will? My hope is that by pointing this out to Jews it will spur a serious discussion amongst Jews to this issue. Most are oblivious or in denial to the path they are on.
Did you pay attention in chemistry? If so, think of the basic model of an atom. If you would blow up the size of a hydrogen atom to such a degree that its radius would reach the height of the dome in Cologne, the corresponding atomic nucleus would be the size of a pea.
Now let’s get to some experiment. Look for the nearest wall and walk into the direction. In the next step you’re going to punch the wall as hard as you can. What’s the result? Doesn’t it feel great when the pain eases?
Now consider that you’ve punched something that consists of many atoms. As already explained in the first paragraph an atom basically consists of a tiny nucleus and even tinier electrons. Okay, … thanks to modern nuclear physics we know that there are even smaller parts than protons and neutrons, but that doesn’t change the fact that for the most part atoms consist of … nothing. Isn’t it amazing that punching something that consists of basically nothing can hurt that much? Isn’t it even more amazing to know that not even the smartest nuclear physicist can tell you the origins of the smallest parts ever discovered? The mystery for the existence of those parts is that they’ve been created by a higher being – God.
Sorry but that is not proof of god. If there were proof then belief would not be a requirement.
What you state is true and known fact for educated people. Not bad to restate here clearly anyway.
The issue you point at however is not constructive and might be deemed reactionary.
Actually what is important is the ideal you fight for.
What is the model you suggest for the “west” to adopt ?
Are you able to formulate an acceptable way forward ?
If not what is your whole point about ?
Unfortunetaly that is the conumdrum we are in.
What is the model we expect.
And how that can it be made to happen.
My humble opinion is that the overall western “system” is not manageable by the best of leader.
Only the inevitable collapse, major crisis or geopolitical shift would bring change for the best/worst (such scenario being looming for a while)
The western majority populace is simply to rich and confortable for too long to rebel or have the moral attitude.
Simply a decadent society.
Aristrocatic, higher morality and personality emerge through hardship. For instance VVP emerging from the rumbles of USSR is no mere luck.
The other option in state of collapse being a bloody or orwellian tyranny.
What you preach for is most important.
What you fight against is important but secondary.
Again what is the whole point of your article whereas your model and way forward for western society is not clearly formulated ?
My 2 cents.
Occultists have infiltrated and perverted the religions, Christianity and Judaism included. Hence the occultists version of the Kabbala, which in reality is akin to the mystical and metaphysical doctrines of Islam, for example. See Leo Schaya–“The Universal Meaning of the Kabbalah,” and also his “Universal Aspects of the Kabbalah and Judaism,” for an authentic view.
Also, the idea of God’s “chosen people” is not “racism.” It is part and parcel of a Revelation, which institutes a “holy people.” It obviously does not apply to just any Jew, or even just any “religious” Jew, and perhaps not even to much of what is left of it today.
The real problem is not whether the Jews are the ‘chosen people’, but that they are no more:
“Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you. 32 For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him. 33 Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country: 34 And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it. 35 And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. 36 Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise. 37 But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son. 38 But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance. 39 And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. 40 When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen? 41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons. 42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? 43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. 44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder. 45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them. 46 But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet” (Matthew 21:31-46).
Very good discussion, Saker.
The relationship between the Tanakh (Old Testament), early Christianity, and Talmudic Pharisaism is complex. Paul and Jesus borrowed from the moral and ethical Torah on matters of marriage, sexual ethics, devotion to God, and monotheism. Jesus even compared the Gentiles to “dogs” in his discourse with the Syrophoenician or Canaanite woman, and his discourse with the Samaritan woman—that “salvation is of the Jews…we know what we worship”—presupposes a kind of cultural superiority that the Jews were to possess, as bearers of an ancient tradition, as opposed to the “heathen” Samaritans. The very notion of Gehenna or Hell presupposes a judgment on non-monotheists, that is, a categorical, blanket judgment against someone for who he is, not merely because he violates divine standards of morality or ethics. Whether Jewish or Orthodox Christian, one must accept the mandate of monotheism or be damned.
The disagreements were about ritual. Paul tried to retain the moral law of the Torah while removing the dogmatic, ritualistic (Pharisaic) aspects. Today Orthodox Christians and Jews continue to argue over Pharisaism. Yet the notion of progressive revelation seems to contradict the notion that the Tanakh, including their genocidal aspects, are as valid as the New Testament and a preparatory basis for it, especially if one adheres to the notion that Scripture is divinely inspired—why the need for progressive revelation to prove that some aspects were not divinely inspired, or even contrary to God? Why not make things clear from the beginning, to avoid centuries of bloodshed and disagreement? Most of the people who composed the Jewish scriptures, well before Talmudic accretions, did not consider the genocidal verses “demonic.”
What is interesting is that many, though not all, instances of altruism and compassion derive from secular rather than religious people, regardless of religious or ethnic background. This does not mean that most secularists are kinder or more compassionate than religious people, but that they often account, perhaps disproportionately, for the spontaneous acts of covenant love (hesed) that do occur. Religious people are often, on average, as dogmatic as the majority of secularists, especially the neocon New Atheists, while the “old,” lower-case atheists and secularists account for what little compassion and beauty exist in a rough world. To be truly human, one must step outside dogma of all kinds. Hence relativism, as in Stan’s comment, seems to be the most humane, which contradicts divine finality and absolutism.
Religion is, first and foremost, a matter of the individual or collective subject, not as something that is imposed from the heavens, but as something that springs from individual and collective interpretation of myth—myth being the deep truth, not something that is literal or wholly false. Hence religion is subjective, and always has been. One may deem it an evolutionary survival mechanism—though, again, one might wonder how, say, monasticism provides an evolutionary advantage. Human beings are fundamentally irrational, even when they pretend otherwise, being preening creatures concerned to rely on their “credentials”—as society’s leaders—to impose “truth,” even when that “truth,” whatever its nature, is anything but. Of course, “irrational” is not be crushed, because crushing irrationality is impossible. It IS the human condition.
Probably the greatest curse on humanity is materialism, material comfort being a driver of wars, especially the West’s millennia-long war against the so-called “rest.” Materialism implies a right to something—to property, to safety, to wealth—that one does not have. Yet that very “right” is an illusion. One cannot arrogate the universe unto oneself. Doing so is disastrous, not just to the individual, but also to the world itself. Materialism also produces its twin antithesis, anti-materialism, which is little more than suicide dressed up. Religion is the “sigh of the oppressed creature” (Marx) in a materialistic, oppressive world; but the sigh reflects the state of the creature, not the validity of religion or any other dogma, secular or not. Material conditions are complex, however, and money does NOT equate to happiness.
The reality is that unhappiness is not spontaneous, but a product of materialism. Materialism embraces all, even religion, and material conditions affect the culture. Culture, in turn, produces the kind of religion, the caliber of its priests, that conditions support. Western materialism unleashed itself against the world; the world suffered and grew envious. Western materialism both oppressed and wooed, indeed co-opted, the oppressed. Nor is Western colonialism and divine right unique to history—it is simply the most aggressive of deep historical currents. Had humanity not developed itself, had it retained its hunter-gatherer roots, we would have been less covetous and hardier. No state, no oppression. Sure, it was far from ideal, but it worked, yet it is in the past. (No, I am not an anarchist.)
The fact is, we don’t need the technology we have. We are forced to. So are other countries. They must adopt, improve on, and perpetuate this Western system, and try to beat the West at its own game, lest their societies fall to the hegemony of Western imperialism, whose hegemony is near-total as of now. I do not see anything on the horizon that would cause this system, its infrastructure, to collapse; banking crises and bubbles would not do the trick. Climate change *might*, but remains an open question. Only an unexpected mass extinction would totally destroy the global economy, and with it the West’s capacity to inflict harm. Only then would the West *truly* vanish—vanish in a physical and metaphysical sense.
So we are lost looking “through a glass, darkly” (Paul) in a “darkling wood” (Dante), the glass of which is but a shadow of nothingness. Hope and religion and science: all three are illusory. They are of no import to our predicament. There is nothing to be done. Everything is set. The only question is how to overcome our fear of death, because death is our past, future, and present. Death is now. Death is more powerful than nuclear weapons or God. It is all. But the universe is more: it is birth and death. It gave birth to us; we were destined to die; we have just chosen to expedite the death—if not physically, then mentally and culturally. We are choosing the time, place, and method of destruction; yet destruction is the final destiny of the solar system. And the universe goes on birthing and dying.
A lot of sound and fury here.
But what is the point.
Speaking of ritual, I came on my own hook via reading of my own in connection with various projects to the conclusion that the Jewish religion has no apparent spiritual components, no spiritual beliefs, and seems to be no more than a collection of rituals, many to most of them primitive, absurd, anti-woman, superstitious, and physically harmful.
So, not being a religious scholar but just an editor, I was surprised to read Israel Shahak’s words that pretty much expressed my own independent view.
Shahak writes of what he terms “classical Judaism” (p. 35–35):
“First, whatever can be said about this cabbalistic system, it cannot be regarded as monotheistic, . . .
Secondly, the real nature of classical Judaism is illustrated by the ease with which this system was adopted. Faith and beliefs (except nationalistic beliefs) play an extremely small part in classical Judaism. What is of prime importance is the ritual act, rather than the significance which that act is supposed to have or the belief attached to it. . . .”
Shahak goes on to point out that many Jews will follow a ritual thinking it to be an act of worship of God, and others will do exactly the same thing with the intention of propitiating Satan.
All in all, propitiation—of Satan, of God, of powerful Gentiles—seems to play a pretty big part in Jewish attitudes and rituals and ethics (or lack of them), and I think this might explain the need for duplicity and the use and approval of lies if it helps the Jews and harms the Gentiles. Another think I notice is the proliferation of acronyms for everything. This seems to be a result partly of the desire for secrecy and the drive to veil every actual meaning from the comprehension of outsiders. It is second nature, and is encouraged, not to say what you mean—deceit is elevated to a positive value. Per Shahak, the name Jesus is itself an acronym fro a curse, “May his name and memory be wiped out” (118n.70). Gentile women are the acronym N.Sh.G.Z : niddah, shifhah, goyah, zonah (unpurified from the menses, slave, Gentile, prostitute). The word for a gentile woman, shiksa, is defined by the Modern Hebrew-English Dictionary, published in Israel, as: “unclean animal; loathsome creature, abomiahntion (colloquial, pronounced shaygetz), wretch, etc.” Nice! This is all per Shahak. In a way what I find most striking about a lot of this endless crazy nonsense and prevarication is its *childishness* !! But, not to forget that rabbis held total power over their communities and that included executions and of course excommunication for any little thing. And this power is growing again in contemporary Israel. Shahak, again, observes that the contemporary Israeli public is very involved with discussions of such angels-on-pinhead issues as whether an uncircumcised dead man should be circumcised before being buried/cremated, etc. Etc. etc.
Katherine, you should read up on narcissism and compare the sorts of things narcissists do to their victims and then reconsider what you have observed.
I have drawn the conclusion that the pharasitic cult controls the Jewish religious in exactly the same way a s a narcissistic boss runs his employees. Lots of pointless lawsa and excessive punishments fro breaking them. Lots of setting up favorites and encouraging them to otrment those who are on the outer. And god help you if you offend them.
It is not a religion, it is a mental health disorder, and it includes as a symptom delusions of grandeur.
Lots and lots of energy can be expended trying to understand Judeaism from religious perspectives, and from cultural perspectives, but at the end of the day the narcissism always wins out, people wise up and they suffer the fate every narcissist suffers when people wise up to what is going on. They get removed from that society and often with considerable vehemence.
“But what is the point.”.
Was that a question?
Acceptance of reality as an essential precursor to equanimity? Maybe.
“Superstition as an evolutionary survival mechanism” is an interesting idea . Superstition could , at this stage , be seen as a vestigial behaviour.
Too soon to say, perhaps :-)
What I mean there is that there may be a question about the usefulness of a behaviour when “natural ” conditions are not evidently extant at a particular time.
What was adaptive for a hunter-gatherer making his tentative way on the plains, may be less useful, countless millennia later, in down-town New York , say.
Anyway , it’s getting O/T. :-)
@“salvation is of the Jews…we know what we worship”
That is supposed to demonstrate that Jesus proclaimed the special status of the Jews. That’s what selective quotations do, but is not exactly what He said to the Samaritan woman:
“7 There cometh a woman of Samaria to draw water: Jesus saith unto her, Give me to drink. 8 (For his disciples were gone away unto the city to buy meat.) 9 Then saith the woman of Samaria unto him, How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? for the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans. 10 Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water. 11 The woman saith unto him, Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep: from whence then hast thou that living water? 12 Art thou greater than our father Jacob, which gave us the well, and drank thereof himself, and his children, and his cattle? 13 Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: 14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life. 15 The woman saith unto him, Sir, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw. 16 Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither. 17 The woman answered and said, I have no husband. Jesus said unto her, Thou hast well said, I have no husband: 18 For thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly. 19 The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet. 20 Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship. 21 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. 22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews*. 23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. 24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. 25 The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things. 26 Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he. 27 And upon this came his disciples, and marvelled that he talked with the woman: yet no man said, What seekest thou? or, Why talkest thou with her? 28 The woman then left her waterpot, and went her way into the city, and saith to the men, 29 Come, see a man, which told me all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ? 30 Then they went out of the city, and came unto him. 31 In the mean while his disciples prayed him, saying, Master, eat. 32 But he said unto them, I have meat to eat that ye know not of. 33 Therefore said the disciples one to another, Hath any man brought him ought to eat? 34 Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work. 35 Say not ye, There are yet four months, and then cometh harvest? behold, I say unto you, Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields; for they are white already to harvest. 36 And he that reapeth receiveth wages, and gathereth fruit unto life eternal: that both he that soweth and he that reapeth may rejoice together. 37 And herein is that saying true, One soweth, and another reapeth. 38 I sent you to reap that whereon ye bestowed no labour: other men laboured, and ye are entered into their labours. 39 And many of the Samaritans of that city believed on him for the saying of the woman, which testified, He told me all that ever I did. 40 So when the Samaritans were come unto him, they besought him that he would tarry with them: and he abode there two days. 41 And many more believed because of his own word; 42 And said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world” (John 4:19-42).
*σωτηρία ἐκ τῶν Ἰουδαίων ἐστίν. ‘Of/from’ the Jews does not mean ‘by’ the Jews.
It is the same message given to the Roman Centurion whose servant Jesus healed:
“When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel. 11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Matthew 8:10-12).
The Saker has once again provided clarity and common sense to a subject that most people are very confused about. They are confused as the result of a deafening, never ending campaign on the part of tribal Jews (the Pharisees) to sell the absurd notion that “antisemitism” has no cause other than a self-existing, otherwise inexplicable aversion to the ancient “victims” of persecution, the long-suffering Jews.
For those not familiar with the following quote, Lazare was an early Zionist who, like most of them in the late 19th century, considered the diaspora Jews to be a very sorry lot whose only hope lay in the creation of their own State which would allow them to evolve into normal human beings. We all know how that turned out.
“It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, since they lived in countries very distant from each other, since they were ruled by very different laws, governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same morals, nor the same customs, since they were animated by unlike dispositions which did not permit them to judge of anything in the same way, it must be therefore that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel.”
~ Bernard Lazare
They were used as finanzier and covered by the elites, their contacts were all over old Europe, later the world.
One element in the picture.
“In 1848 the word “anti-Semitic” was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word “Jew”.
H.H.Beamish in a New York address, Fall of 1937.
“The Biological Jew” by Eustance Mullins
“A fool may throw a stone into a well, which a hundred wise men cannot pull out.”
So with ‘anti-semitism’. In its proper sense ‘Semitism’ is a linguistic category: “A word or phrase (construction or idiom) typical of or influenced by Hebrew or Aramaic” (e.g. ‘Abbot Jean Carmignac compiled a long list of Semitisms found in the Gospels’, ‘the amount of Hebrew and Aramaic Semitisms found in the Greek of the second gospel match what would be expected from a Jerusalem-bred Christian’).
From the start the notion of ‘anti-semitism’ is non-sensical, it doesn’t define anything.
Modern Jewry denies it has any ties to ancient Hebrewism; to the ancient House of Judah; yet, Jewry makes use of the term Jew to fool the goyim into thinking they are; that being said only ten percent or less of what is known as Jewry is of Judah; the rest are either Edomites or the Japhethite Ashkenazis.
The word Jew in its primary meaning does not refer to any of the tribes of the House of Israel which is the tribes of the Northern Kingdom. The bible is very specific about this: the name Israel belongs to the house of Joseph (Genesis 48: 15,16): Judah has no authority to be called Israel unless all the tribes are together as a nation. The widely held belief that the House of Israel disappeared and no longer exists is heresy and is calling Jehovah a liar: Genesis 49:1 directly references the last days and the presence of all the tribes.
The leadership of Jewry knows that Israel still exists. The words goy/goyim contain as one of its meanings the House of Israel. Again, the leadership of Jewry know this; so when it speaks thusly about the goyim, they know full well that they are including the descendants of the House of Israel: they are openly declaring their murderous intent.
One of my pet peeves when studying the bible is when commentators who should know better keep referring to all of Israel as Jews; such terminology diminishes their scholarship.
Trudeau to Apologize for Canada’s Decision to Reject Jewish Refugees in 1939
The israelis who own jr trudeau really couldn’t give a flying f about the fate of those refugees, it is the timing right now why the had jr talk about this. Full insync with the trump regime wholesale subservience to israel, and the current rebranding of the obscene zionazi regime taking place in the zionazified west.
This is a very interesting book which binds the historical aspects of Jews in Russia with those in USA and is a very good insight into 20th Century developments.
It is usually overlooked that one of the prime sources of Jewish tribalism, even for unbelieving Jews, is based on rabbinical control of the very idea of ‘jewishness’. They not only consider their people God’s Chosen to rule the world, but tightly hold together the Jewish Tribe through fear – instilling that fear of the world from birth. Judaism not only teaches Jewish supremacy and the ultimate rule of the Jew over the nations of the world, it also teaches a deep fear of the world, a world whose intent is always to subjugate and eliminate the Jew. This concept is taught so deeply that even non-religious Jews frequently fear doing or saying anything that might reflect badly on the Tribe or be construed as breaking tribal bonds. This fear was also used by the Zionists in both world wars to accomplish their ultimate ends for those wars – the creation of the state of Israel. Many Jews were intentionally sacrificed for this end.
An excellent study of the Jewish mission and the role of the ruling rabbis over the centuries can be found in the book, The Controversy of Zion, by Douglas Reed who sacrificed his distinguished career as a journalist in the 50s by exposing this.
“It is not a religion, it is a mental health disorder, and it includes as a symptom delusions of grandeur.”
I can pretty much agree with this, although I am on principle against jumping to labeling others’ problems or positions with which I disagree as insanity—as that is a totalitarian kind of thing. But the collective Jewish mentality (to the extent that technical Jews sign on to it; of course, they do not have to do so and many have fled it) does seem to have some attributes of a collective delusion. It is time to stop romanticizing the shtetl, a la Fiddler on the Roof and that Barbra Streisand film, oh, yes, Yentl, and understand it for what it was. Anyone who acts in any way to perpetuate this nonsense may be delusional—but for many, delusional like a fox. Think of all of those newly minted settlers from Brooklyn etc. getting free digs in the occupied territories (supported by Yankee taxpayers!!), plus they get to live out their cowboy fantasies. (Makes me wonder whether a more progressive housing policy in the USA might dampen some of the motivations to move to Israel!)
BTW, Shahak also has what I consider to be a penetrating analysis—it is not long—of the actual source of antisemitism in Germany and elsewhere in western Europe, and he does ascribe this to irrational fears (fear of the “other”) under the pretext of outright racism that thrived among reactionary forces that wanted to roll back the roller-coaster economic, financial, political, and social changes occurring in Germany and elsewhere, but especially Germany. He may be right he may be wrong, but there are very interesting narratives in Amos Elon, “The Pity of it All: A Portrait of the German-Jewish Epoch, 1743–1933” (very worthwhile read, IMO) that support this view. About the struggles of German Jews in, say, Berlin, to escape their background and label. See, for example, the pp. 79–80 about Rahel Levin. Of course Heine is another example among many assimilated Jews who just wanted to be considered Germans but were refused this, no matter what they did. There are a lot.That was a racial “stain,” a racial prison, like the “one drop of blood” African American stain in the USA. It is not that antisemitism never existed. But what it really was and is needs to be carefully defined.
Victor, the Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox Rabbis control who may be defined as a ‘Jew’ in Israel, control marriages and their yeshivas are full of head-nodding, chanting, youth who avoid the draft and other obligations. I once read the maunderings of an Orthodox Judaic figure, who, in attempting to answer the perennial question of ‘Who is Amalek?’, the group who ‘God’ has declared must be exterminated one day, stated that it was the ‘United States of Amalek’. Why? Because of the great ‘..loss of precious Jewish souls’ in the USA caused by ‘out-marriage’. Really, once a host society becomes aware that a tiny group living within their bounds believes that their souls are superior to those of non-members of that group (whose souls are closer to those of animals, as Rabbi Kook the Elder declared)is it really surprising that some people will find that offensive and threatening?
Considering the article and the comments, my own life experience I would ad that Judaism is not a tribe, but purely a religious cult/crime syndicate, for the most part mentally defective, infected with a false sense of cultural superiority, manipulative, sociopaths by nature, masters at rhetoric and dogma. Is it any wonder they were branded of “the synagog of Satan”?
“Russophobia”, even translated as fear or hatred of things Russian (rather than specifically irrational fear), is unreasonable. You may think of causes for it – evolutionary psychology, theories of socialisation, some history… None of which makes it any more reasonable.
“Judeophobia” is similarly unreasonable, I take it – hence the analogy between the two. Yet we are presented with the foul opinions of this Rabbi (and many others) as a “cause” of Judeophobia. A “cause” doesn’t make it reasonable. We aren’t even given evidence that it is a significant cause. Are we to take it as a reason, not just a cause, a sufficient reason?
I ask as someone clearly confused (and not a little stupid, I readily confess). I ask, not the blogger, but anyone in the “community” more savvy than me.
It sounds so strange, you see, during 2000 years there was no such thing like a secular Jew or a secular christian, 99% of the peole were fanatically religious, in view of what the talmud contains, driving a Jewish community into a christian city (rather than a muslim one) was the equivalent of a suicide pact. Because soon or late these accusations (blasphemy, usury,human sacrifices) would surface and put them in trouble. But still the bulk of them chose to stay in Europe except when they were forcibly expelled from Spain.
I have an hypothesis, they rarely moved one by one to settle in a city, but rather as a cohesive group. So after each expulsion, the community leaders were the ones who decided where they would go. Political leaders have to be connected to big money to consolidate their powers, so usurers. A jewish shoemaker could easily make a living in Istambul or Casablanca, but not an usurer due to the islamic ban. So the whole cycle was restarted, until the christians saw that they were spitting/cursing near their graveyards or churches.
For the moment it’s just an hypothesis but that could explain this apparent masochist attitude to stay in Europe.
“By 1723 freemasonry had already incorporated the Noachidic statutes into its Constitutions… Charges & Regulations; freemasons have always called themselves ‘Noachids’. In 1991 when the first war on Iraq was started, George Bush Senior forwarded this peculiar “blessing” to the whole nation: The seven Noachidic laws were solemnly declared to be the foundation of the United States by the Congress and the President.” 
Zionists Declare War on Native Europeans
1. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFbdVKCjQ_k&t=45s
2. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0vZuUsHpW8&t=11s
3. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2dRwGF3K2Q&t=11s
4. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKPecseP4O4
5. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkvtmM_5cwQ
6. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xa64g9QGrpc
7. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KkTE9GioVY
8. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVVWejaxmp4
9. – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw53eH00udM
This morning I woke up with the words of Herve Ryssen regarding Judaism being a political project more than anything else. It was a response to Saker’s always stimulating thoughts which often leave me with the feeling that I want to respond or add to the conversation but that in the allotted time of about one day I do not seem to have enough time. Internet dialogue is very immediate; comments are made as if off the cuff or on the spur of the moment, when the writer has probably taken some time and thought to write the piece (with study spanning decades, in this case, as Saker says). Here is what Herve says, presumably when in a good mood:
Judaism is essentially a political project. It is important for Jews to work toward the emergence of a world at “peace, ” a peace meant to be universal and permanent. It is therefore not a coincidence that this word “peace ” (shalom in Hebrew) is found frequently in Jewish discourse worldwide. In the perfect world that they are building, all conflicts will disappear between the nations. This is why Jews have been militating tirelessly for many years for the abolition of all borders, the dissolution of national identities and the establishment of a global empire of “peace.” The very existence of separate nations is considered to be responsible for the triggering of wars and turmoil. so they must be weakened and eventually replaced by a world government, a “one world government, ” a “New World Order, ” one single world-ruling authority that will permit happiness and prosperity to reign, Jewish-style, on earth.
And a bit later he gets to what he really thinks:
Their “mission” (and Jews frequently use this term “mission”) is to disarm the other peoples, to dissolve anything which is not Jewish or Jewish-controlled, to grind the people down to a powder for making a new identity-free work force, and thus to favor a universal “peace” among the peoples who have no more “divisive” identities.
The whole piece can be read here.
A rabbi tells the truth about Hitler and the Jews!
Another excellent article by The Saker. I sent the link to a friend for his reaction. He is not Jewish but is very sympathetic to Jews because of his great interest in the Kabbalah. His response was as follows, and I would like to see others’ comments on this.
He cites en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_Jews and continues:
For myself I suspect that the reason Jews are prominent in many fields has less to do with genetics or theology and more to do with their family upbringing and the position of Jews in society (often beginning from an inauspicious situation but advancing rapidly, as was the case with Jewish immigrants to the U.S. at the start of the 20th C.). And, of course, their belief held by most of them in their superiority to the goyim.
I agree with your friend: Jews are over-represented by a factor of *10 or more in learned professions, government and financial institutions. No amount of odium, phobia or name-calling will change this.
“Who is my best friend? my greatest rival: the one who keeps me up to the mark” — Bernard Shaw
Hot – housing and networking.
Not to mention the Red Shield trillions, enabling institutional control through banking.
But they have serious competition from the Chinese, and the Russians.
Which they are fully aware of.
Prepare for increased anti-Sinoism in media and entertainment, and infiltration through the usual vectors in China itself (pretty much neutralised in Russia through assimilation and the ‘long leash’ multi – faith doctrine.)
One reason of the successes of the Jews is not so much their belief in their specialness (which gives them that confidence, perseverance, boldness, chutzpah, you name it, in tackling life), but the way how they manage to instill in the minds of the ‘others’ the cult of Jewish ‘exceptionality’.
Sorry but I dont buy the “specialness” argument. The religion runs on the stench of narcissism. Self praise and rat cunning are its specialities, and the inner core uses its outer membership as pawns with ruthless efficiency.
But at the heart of the ‘chosenite’ propaganda machine is a deep inferiority complex.
I stumbled across it in an exchange with a Zionist Brit when musing on the failure of Judaism to establish any significant architecture – unlike the other religions.
The excuse was exclusion, but that doesn’t wash: they have had ample historical opportunity to develop distinctive architectural tropes if they had the desire and know – how.
Their mercantalism should have exposed them to many styles and generated something distinctive. But it didn’t.
The synagogue is the only religious place of worship that has no distinctive architecture, unlike Islam, Christianity (Latin, Orthodox, Protestant), Buddhism and Hinduism.
Nor are Jews well – represented in the arts, especially music, unlike for example Germans and Russians.
Perhaps because mathematics is not really a Jewish ‘talent’. (Currently Israel is trying to position itself as a tech world leader, and should be capable of doing so given the variety of Jewish backgrounds – Russian to Ethiopian. Instead, they have recruit from abroad. What does that say about its educational system, depsite the billions of dollars going their way?)
One has to Wonder if the political destructiveness of Zionism is related to this lack of architectural permanence and a deep resentment toward the ‘Goy’ who have in all their various manifestations contributed so much to the art of the Mason.
Many of those names listed are Godless, evil souls who have caused untold misery to the human race. An example would be those 50 t0 60 million Christians annihilated in Russia after the 1917 Revolution. Zuckerburg is aiding the US government in spying on the people as well as suppressing free speech. ‘Evolve and flourish’??? Your friend is not dealing with reality. Reuters established in the mid 1800’s as well as all the major TV networks in the US are in the hands of Jews to spread the propaganda that your friend believes in. Maybe he’s a CryptoJew.
To add to my point about the absence of distinctive architectural tropes in Judaism /antiquities /arts…
The following comment was made in response to a researcher who had difficulties finding evidence of same :
This is a difficult question too answer, I had been asking the group here for years for any archeological proof of some Jewish civilization in Palestine. I came with no answer. Even the claimed Western wall is built by the Roman to protect their camp on top of the mount.
This is most likely because of the nomadic origin of the Jews since they moved from Mesopotamia ( today’s Iraq) to Palestine and then to Egypt and then to Sinai and then too Palestine and then they were captured by the Assyrians taken to Persia and then sent out of Palestine 2000 years ago
Different from any nation in the region ( the Babylonians, the Egyptians, the Greek, the Romans..you name it) they have no single proof that they had been there except in their books
And if you read Genesis 21:34, it says
New Living Translation (©2007)
“And Abraham lived as a foreigner in Philistine country for a long time”.
So they had been foreigners to the land since Abraham
DAN DAN ·
I have suspected for some time that the wholesale looting of Middle East antiquities – Iraq and more recently in Syria – is not unrelated to this glaring ‘absence of evidence’.
Expect some’ discoveries’ in ‘Israel’ of antiquities that serve – not coincidentally – the Zionist narrative.
Anon, your Jewish friend’s chauvinism and supremacism are pretty typical. While it is unarguable that Jews have contributed greatly to humanity, for good and ill, this sort of Messianic and outrageously narcissistic garbage is really offensive. It outright denigrates the goyim, asserting that the Jews, and not ALL the people, represent the ‘..sensitive centre of social and active life’??!! of societies.
Such grandiose egomania represents a sort of collective (among those Jews who really believe it)insanity of arrogance, and among those goyim who accept it (to reject it would, of course, be ‘antisemitic’)a type of self-hating obeisance that is truly chilling.
Not only does it ignore and devalue the contributions of the likes of Shakespeare, Bach, Tolstoy, Newton, Beethoven, Mozart, Michelangelo-need I go on all day- but utterly ignores, with barely disguised racism, the contributions to humanity of the great civilizations of China, India and Islam, where, particularly in the first two, Jewish contributions were, and are, negligible.
Such attitudes, of course, imply the familiar Judaic trope that they, and the Ashkenazim in particular, are the intellectual cream of humanity. I doubt that the recent achievements of south and east Asians in exams in the USA confirm that narcissistic lunacy. Jews do well in academe because they have practised a type of eugenic approach to breeding over the centuries, greatly value education, are driven to ‘succeed’, to prove their superiority, and practise intensely nepotistic group preference and promotion. These are also why Jews excel in other less salubrious activities, like pornography, sex trafficking, human organ trafficking, surveillance industries and financial crime. The Jews have contributed more than their share of human achievements, for good and ill, but these sorts of supremacist delusions merely indicate the contempt of certain Jews for non-Jews. It is, I do not doubt, the cause of much of the antipathy that is directed at Jews, and is probably intended to do so.
Fermi was not Jewish although his wife was. Neither Bohr or Pauli were raised as Jews . Pauli as a Roman Catholic. Bohr was raised in the Church of Denmark. Some of their forebears were Jewish.
And Spinoza was expelled by the Jewish hierarchy, and did not practice any aspect of Judaism. He would be more accurately described as Portuguese and an agnostic.
Einstein actively rejected Zionist /Jewish supremacist attempts to claim him as a ‘member’ – not only did he refuse the presidency of ‘Israel’, he himself identified as German, specifically Swabian. Indeed, much of Jewish heritage is outweighed by other factors, like the host culture and education system, and intermarriage with other ethnicities. Hence the ongoing controversy around ‘fractional’ genetics, where rather desperately, the supremacists claim even small traceable percentages of ‘jewishness’ of ‘desirable’ individuals as exclusively ‘Jewish.’
Of course, none of this fits into the official narrative, precisely because both were too smart for ‘chosenite’ jingoism.
Arguably their contributions occurred *despite *their Jewish backgrounds rather than because of it.
I am sorry but at least the Noahide law:
Prohibition of Theft
is something that not even jews are following (they have flooded the stock market all the banking sectors worldwide) and make fortunes with the money manipulation against the welfare of other people (jews or not). Or not?
Thanks Saker for the article.
On this topic, two subjects would be of interest, ie Zionism and cryto-Jews.
Zionism is the national movement of the Jewish people that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel (roughly corresponding to Canaan, the Holy Land, or the region of Palestine). Wikipedia
If this is so, then the Jews have already established their homeland over which they have full power, except those bits like the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. According to the Wikipedia definition, the term Zionism is no longer appicable.
In dealing with the Jews, deception is the modus operandi. What is not mentioned in the definition is the true Zionist agenda. And that is Oded Yinon’s plan, to take control of all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates. This is at one level of deception. Though this is not hidden, as the Plan can be searched on the internet.
On a sidenote, what is hidden about the Plan is the southern boundary. It shows the border north of Medina, and, of course, Mecca (as Mecca is more southerly from Medina). This is another level of deception.
Abraham (as) ” founded” the Kaaba. Jews having defined the Holy Land as where their ancestors settled previously, Egypt and Babylon, it is not illogical to extrapolate that the southern border includes Islam’s two Holy Cities. Especially because it is Abraham’s legacy that is in Mecca.
Three Jewish tribes settled in Medina, before the Koranic Revelations. According to Muslim traditions, they were there because the Rabbis knew of the coming of Mohammad (saw).
These tribes made war and/or betrayed the Muslims, which resulted in them being kicked out of Medina.
Zionism can be defined as protecting and nurturing the Jewish state and to make Oded Yinon’s plan a reality, including Mecca and Medina.
These would include Christians and Muslims. There may be Buddhists, as I consider Buddha a prophet, though his teachings have been corrupted, and Jews have a propensity for corrupting true religion, including their own, which they happily corrupt. I would include corruption of Islam in this, which will be discussed later.
I am Muslim, and in all discussion, I hold the “standard” view of Islam, except when I differ from the standard, I will mention it. This includes my belief regarding Buddha, which is not standard Muslim belief. This does not affect my core beliefs, in any case.
The discourse is narrowed to the Saud/Wahabi combo. David Livingstone discussed the ancestry of both the Saud patriach and Abdul.Wahab, and gave evidence of the Donmeh Jewish ancestry of both.
Corruption of Islam is difficult, as the Koranic text cannot be changed. What has been done was to add fullstops to the text giving different meanings. Or mistranslate into another language. Or to misinterpret with commentaries.
The easiest way to corrupt is through the Hadiths (sayings and doings of the Prophet).
The analytical approach as expounded by Sheikh Imran is the most logical way to combine both the Koran and Hadith together. In which the Koran is the core and the Hadith has to be supported by the Koran. If not supported, those particular Hadiths have to be put aside.
Combining these two things, Zionism and Oded Yinon; and crypto-Jews and corruption of Islam, one can easily see how the spread of the Takfiris is so rabidly extensive in the world of Islam.
While the Wahabi corruption has been present since at least Caliph Ali, (the Kwararij), they have never gained the widespread hold on Muslim that they have now.
The ground has to be prepared for the corruption to take hold. Fertile ground being the western wars on Islam, the impoverishment of Muslim countries by imperialism, influence and rejection of western cultures, etc. Take your pick.
The spread of the corrupted version of Islam greased by the financial powwr of the crypto-Jews is then fairly easy.
It is most unfortunate that the Takfiris do not understand that they are the footsoldiers of the Anglo-Zionist empire.
The core Muslim beliefs, to my mind, are truth, justice and compassion. And if war is unavoidable, then it has to be defensive, never offensive. These beliefs are applicable to all of God’s creations. There is nothing here compatible with Takfiri beliefs, except when ” all of God’s creations” is substituted by “Takfiri Muslims”. Then it makes sense.
It seems, the Takfiris have adopted the Jewish supremacist racist beliefs and applied it to their version of Islam. Which is why they can kill other types of Muslims, Christians, etc. But never Jews. Is it not strange?
You can read what he says on this subject here.
Judaism is Judaism . It might be a matter of degree, but it’s based first on the Old Testament tribal diety who’s foundation is an exclusive diety out of Sumeria. ‘ I first revealed myself as El Shaddai but my real name was Yahweh ‘. : Thou shall have no other God ( s) but Yahweh’ . ‘ Make no graven image of me ‘. These basic tenets ,along with commands to take literal control ,on this God’s behalf of Caanan – to form the center of a world Empire for them is the basis of original Judiasm. Bringing curses down on Egyptian Civilization , is what Jews ,and their exclusive God does . Don’t cheer . If your a Gentile ; any gentile – even Jew Worshipping variety that means YOU ! Non religious Judiasm has it’s bases in the religious . Create revolution, and war against the Foundations of original Gentile culture . I assure you ; the world would become ,and has been subjected to hell under Judaism in any ,and all of it’s manifestations. Beg , admire , tolerate , study , the Jews ,and try to tell them where they went wrong will merit YOU nothing . Insist that you as a ,” real Christain ‘ , supports or admires them ; ” understand them ” , and they think mission accomplished. Why? They are taught , “‘Make war bu deception”. Talmudic Judaism basis is ALL Judaism . That means any other ‘ God ,’ is out . That includes Christ ,Trinity ,Mary , Saints , Greco -Roman philosophy, Buddism , and ALL gentile Polytheistic foundations . It amazes me how the Jews can hide in plane site . Looking for ” good ” in Judaism ” , merits you nothing from them ,or helps yourself . In the religious sense; if Judiasm was any good ; Christ would not of created a New Covenant….” You cannot put new wine in old skins “. ” I give you a NEW command : ‘ Love one another ‘.
Once again, this hateful paranoid being chooses to demonize Jews for something that they have no control over, namely whatever was written in the ancient holy books. You can foam at the mouth about the Jews all you want, curse them all you want,hate Jews all you want, but the command “Love one another” does and had always applied to all Jews and Jews as individuals as well. It is people like you more than anybody, who creates hell and causes endless pain to others. Change begins with the self. Love or perish!
This ‘chosenism’ is a double – edged sword.
Inevitably, the mentality of entitlement/exploitation pathologizes individuals and results in intergenerational harm within the ‘chosenite’ population itself :
American ‘exceptionalism’ is producing the same result – a pandemic of institutional, cultural and political child – abuse.
When Putin said ‘stay away from our children’ I thought ‘finally, a world leader is bucking the trend….’
The damage inflicted by Jews on white/Western/Christian culture and thought is vast but one particularly nefarious example that stands out in every discussion non-Jews have about Jews is the demolition of LOGIC.
Take the example of the concept of generalizations — the operation of defining individual entities by major characteristics and then sorting them out in “like” groups (e.g., elms and pine trees and oaks are trees!). Without generalization we are back at the stone age IQ level whereby we have words for Bison, deer or hare but no concept and thus no word for “game: or even “animal.”
The Jews have legislated the language into JewSpeak so that generalizations now derisively called “stereotyping”: are bad, bigoted, racist, etc. This is driven by their overwhelming fear of being IDENTIFIED as a distinct group, alien and hostile.
A false and misleading debate about “good Jews”/”real Jews” is meant to invalidate any “stereotyping” of Jews. It is false because every single generalization will always come with exceptions. Thinking Gentiles used to know this, hence the saying “the exception proves the rule,” meaning that by dint of being exceptions they prove the veracity of the generalization.
I see only two kids of Jews: “real Jews” (virtually all of them) and “defective Jews” (the rare Jews who aspire to be “like other people” and to attain the impossible goal of assimilating while … remaining Jews. They remain tethered to their inner Jewishness (even if they proclaim themselves to be “ex-Jews”). In fact, their very act of personal rebellion is an attempt to salvage the image of the Jew and thus represents an act of self-flagellation on behalf of the Tribe.
Those who cut themselves loose and definitively leave the Tribe behind, who make no exceptions for Jewishness/Judaism (like Brother Nathanael), who are not “ex-Jews” extolling the wisdom of “my favorite rabbi”, are extremely rare and should not even be mentioned in any discussion about “Jews” — a group to which they belong only by an accident of birth.
Please, generalize without fear, Gentiles, so as to remain sane and capable of coherent thought, which is paramount to survival.
Very accurate analysis. Few people realize the current “Judaism” has come down from the very Pharisees whose “tradition” (now in the Talmud) and practices and attitudes Jesus condemned in person.
And where did the Pharisees get it from? Babylon mainly, although the idolatry practiced in the Kingdom of Judah could well have given the Babylonians a lot to take note of. An exchange of ideas?
The Pharisees have managed to spread the idea that Jews are disliked because they killed Christ. That is not so, Christians believe that Jesus had to die, they were merely the instrument.
But they then followed that up by killing Christians too, and through a marvelous piece of misdirection no one talks about that as maybe a reason they have aroused so much hostility.
Besides Jews were the first Christians. Jews are not the problem, Pharisees are. Other Jews are their cannon fodder. Expendable. Like the rest of mankind.
The persecution by Nero also reportedly came through the Pharisees who reportedly influenced Nero’s wife……..she was Jewish.
Jesus said to them “you are of your father the devil.” Maybe that is why they are so influential in this Satanic world.
Its pretty much standard for a religion to say that their imaginary friend will like you better if you declare and profess your belief and love in this imaginary friend as opposed to the other imaginary friends out there. You see, in the imaginary afterlife our imaginary friend is going to throw a party, and only the cool kids who believe in this imaginary friend will be invited.
Most religions also add that its ok to hate and kill and torture while here on earth anyone who talks badly about your imaginary friend. Jesus seems to have omitted this key part in his preachings, so the Pope edited the teachings and added this in later when they wanted to declare a crusade to fund-raise for a new roof on the church.
Does this not apply to every religion currently considered mainstream though?
They all started as cults with a small number of members. They succeeded (got big) because the fundamental aspect of their ideology is the notion that their members (and only their members) are exceptional. Non-members are at best second-class citizens or, at worst, sub-humans going to Hell. As soon as the cult members internalize the notion of them being exceptional (superior), they become a tool used by the cult leaders to exploit, oppress, enslave, and if necessary, exterminate “non-members”.
It’s no wonder that “non-members” have a deeply-ingrained fear of “other” cults.
I have read the long, detailed review at Amazon, and this book certainly looks very interesting.
I have ordered from the library (yes, it is in the Truro library, on the Outer Cape).
“They all started as cults with a small number of members. They succeeded (got big) because the fundamental aspect of their ideology is the notion that their members (and only their members) are exceptional. ”
Actually, I thought you were going to write ” . . . because they became a state religion.”
Not sure why I thought you would write this—but I think to some extent it is true.
True of Christianity (“In this sign conquer”), of Islam (became a “state religion” as soon as the Muslims conquered enough territory to have a “statet”; this is partly what ISIS has been trying to do: conquer territory to become a state); Christianity qua state religion certainly lasted a long time, throughout the Middle Ages and really up to the present day in many countries, including the USA; Buddhism has a few states under its belt; Hinduism is more and more becoming the state religion of India and is becoming ever more aggressive. And then we have Judaism: maintained itself as a state within a state, by means of the power of rabbis (controlling poor Jews and helping control Christian serfs, etc.) and rich Jews (interceding with powerful Gentiles to maintain special status of the interior “state.” now that Judaism has its own real state, the religion does seem to be spreading its tentacles and growing. Growing new tentacles.
Or, mycelia going everywhere. The biggest living thing is a fungus!
These are just spontaneous speculations on my part. Perhaps off the wall.
with all respect I might point at the picture, heading the analysis, which the latter i’m d’accord with
but the picture shines on the one extrem and the non-imaged Jewish of everyone friend the other, and between these extremes seem to be the Jewish truth as a given like anyone is a given here on earth.
From Russia we have to learn the politeness of the ‘Son’, respecting each entity in it’s own conditions.
People like the Russian President + team are role models for their civilisations and as such to the planet vide Syria, vide Afganian voices about the russians in them times etc.
Only humility lets the hearts been governed by the heavens and their miracles and there’s a lot of humility around here at the Sakers’, hence my ‘astromundane diary’ has got a ‘home’-corner in this cafe like nowhere else on this planet.
It’s great to move together in this times, and strength to Bro for his professional actions, and see you in
next leisure time, maybe
and today I walked towards a sloped green meadow with three black horses eating grass and a group of hiker was coming the way, 2/3 talking, the last 1/3 smiling saying “Hello”, no one seen the sceene so meaningfull to the soul …
For what good is all Expressionism, I thought, if the visitors of abstract Expressionism’s birthplace havn’t any feeling for the still existing ‘motives’ they are walking through talking every day.
But they are our neighbours. Maybe more blessed are their children.
Expanding on your side note For whatever it is worth, in my life I have seen more kindness and compassion from (secular) Jews than from my fellow Orthodox Christians. …
Look at this world and you’ll realize the “God” many (if not most) people worship in present day is $, instead of the true God. Sadly this worship also affects lots of Christian Churches and their ministers. Lots of them are in bed with politicians and finance.
What a peculiarly twisted notion; that God, who is not a Jew, should choose Jews to be His ‘Chosen People. Looks like a scam, by Jews, to me.
Relax. You should have known by now that God repented and took the ‘chosenness’ from them:
“The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof”.
“The children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth”
“And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that He spake of them”
Is this the Christian’s doctrine?
Yes, it is, whether you like it or not. The fundament of Christian’ doctrine’ is the words and commandment of the Christ, recorded in the Scriptures, and not the fanciful fables you listen to.
This is the ‘sound doctrine’ St. Paul was referring to:
“3. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables” (2 Timothy 4:3).
“13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; 14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth” (Titus 1:13-14).