by Nicholas Molodyko for The Saker Blog
They need to understand that we know. We need to understand that they are human.
From my youth I had a strong connection to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, but I did not know precisely why. His name was mentioned in our house. His friends were friends of my parents.
Solzhenitsyn was supposed to spend a summer in the late 1970s with our family in Alaska. That was the plan, one that excited me. In preparation, I attempted to read Cancer Ward, the semi-autobiographical novel Solzhenitsyn completed in 1966, a dissection of the cancerous Soviet police state. I was 12 years old. I was unprepared for such a thing. It would be a long time before I had the maturity.
Solzhenitsyn in that spring of 1978 gave the famous commencement speech at Harvard, where he publicly shamed the country’s elite, to an America unprepared to accept such a thing. And it would be a long time before the country even had the maturity to understand and could really do so.
Solzhenitsyn did not visit us in Alaska that year.
Now, I’m over forty years older, Donald Trump is America’s 45th President, and the country is revisiting the prophet’s words. Because President Trump is up against the same angry Harvard crowd.
Under a False Flag
From the earliest days in the build up to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, as part of a purely political strategy, Vladimir Lenin attacked Tsar Nicholas II for his alleged mistreatment of Jews and publicly denounced not only all manifestations of antisemitism but everything but the kitchen sink that could be associated with it.
After the Revolution, when Lenin took power in Russia, he endorsed the establishment of special departments for Jewish affairs in both the ruling Communist Party and in the relevant ministry, the Commissariat of Nationalities, headed by Joseph Stalin. Lenin had taken note of the higher percentage of Jews in the revolutionary movement than their proportion in the population, and he initiated the promotion of Jews to higher positions in the state and party apparatus. Lenin essentially took from Oliver Cromwell’s playbook. And, voilà, an elite Jewish politburo was born.
“With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders,” said Sir Winston Churchill referring to the Soviet government.
The Bolsheviks claimed power on November 7, 1917 and two days later the fledgling government issued its famous “Decree on Peace.”
The Balfour Declaration, a letter dated November 2, 1917 from British Foreign Secretary Lord Arthur Balfour to Lord Walter Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain, was then published on the very same day as Lenin’s “Decree on Peace.”
This was kept secret, because in 1917 the British government, through international bankers, offered a national home for Jews in Palestine, at the expense of the land and future of the Palestinians.
The promissory note to Lord Rothschild for the Zionist Federation, the Balfour Declaration, partly drafted by Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Louis Brandeis, and underwritten by U.S. Congress has cost and continues to cost American taxpayers billions of dollars a year.
The year 1917 was a very big year, indeed. A revolutionary one. A transparent cabal of British and American financiers backed Vladimir Lenin and the so-called Jewish “Bolsheviks” set out to destroy Russia and murder tens of millions of Christians, at very same time the Balfour Declaration backed by a secret cartel was signed to establish a Jewish state in the Middle East where Palestinians would be mass murdered, as if by Biblical design.
In “Under a False Flag,” Lenin described a three-phase development of capitalism, culminating in reactionary and militarist imperialism, sustaining itself through super-profits used to secure the support of an aristocracy. It is a Biblical account of opportunism. Then, in “The Deception of the People by the Slogans of Equality and Freedom,” Lenin warns about the elaborate false flag operations and deception perpetuated under the disguise of democracy.
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves,” said Vladimir Lenin.
On June 8, 1978, an exiled Russian author spoke out against the malign media and its suppression of independent thought during a commencement speech at Harvard University, in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He was in the belly of the elite beast that controls America, and he knew it.
Much has been written about that event. Much has still gone unsaid. I plan to say some of the unsaid things.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was a writer in the grand 19th century Russian literary tradition who represents our plight today to defeat violence and lies, the twin pillars of 21st century authoritarianism, in America. The twin pillars of the totalitarianism in the East in the 20th century that Solzhenitsyn warned us from that day forth.
On that day at Harvard in the 20th century, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s words had the same effect as the preaching of John the Baptist. Both had a sharp message to deliver to an audience they believed had grown complacent and morally decadent.
Solzhenitsyn tried to shake up the exact people he believed were responsible for the decline of the West and installation of a politburo, the shrill war mongers in Washington DC. Similarly, John the Baptist denounced the moral depravity of King Herod and his politburo. The politburo was the principal policymaking committee in the former Soviet Union, founded in 1917, to oversee the violence and lies of the state. It is the most appropriate word.
For his prophetic word, John the Baptist was thrown into a dirty dungeon. Then, on September 11th of that year, to be exact, his head was offered on a platter as a gift from Herod to his equally depraved daughter, Salome. In 1978, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was banished from the intellectual set in America. Harvard, the New York Times and DC’s politburo put his head on a metaphorical cocktail tray.
When the most influential group of American intellectuals, liberals and Neoconservatives alike, united against one man, a Russian refuge in a New England town, there was unquestionably a John the Baptist vibe. Both prophets were dismembered, dismissed for saying too much.
Speaking of prophets, the esteemed Palestinian scholar Edward W. Said wrote that “American Orientalism” is unique because it is seen almost entirely thru the prism of Israel. To be precise, the Zionist Israel of the Ashkenazi European Jews. He’s been dead for nearly 17 years. But the British are pathologically relentless in their perverse cruelty and continue to this day post mortem to brutally smear Edward Said for saying too much. He has been dismissed by the Zionist powers even in death.
Today, we simply cannot dismiss the most uncomfortable part, the distinct roles that atheist Jews have played in empire and in the installation of a suzerain or politburo in the Holy Roman, Habsburg, Russian, French, British, and American Empires, and in the outcomes of the Israel project via the World Wars and the British Zionist enterprise today. But, let’s get one thing straight. Capisce? We are talking about a policy making minority of white, liberal, atheist, intellectual elites, not Jews, in general. Not by a long shot. John the Baptist and Solzhenitsyn were warning us about the conspiracy of identity politics, not about Jews. They were warning us about rich, atheist oppressors. They were not fingering religious Jews.
I think Zionism in America today is best understood as what is left of the politburo —decades of clandestine operations of a rogue network of military-industrial complex officials and intelligence agents involved in an invisible government supporting a British enterprise. Zionism has more in common with a corporation than a religion or even a political ideology. Zionism has got little to do with religious Jews. In fact, Zionism is opposed to Judaic dogma and is thus heretical. Not to mention that Zionism is next level schismatic.
Let’s start at the beginning. There are three Abrahamic religions, a group of Semitic-originated religions that claim descent from the Judaism of the ancient Israelites and the worship of the God of Abraham. According to the Hebrew calendar, this is the year 5,781. Christianity was founded 2,020 years ago, and Islam 1,450 years ago. Each religion was originally a whole one. Over time, each has encountered schism.
A schism is a division between people, usually belonging to a religious denomination. The word is most frequently applied to a split in what had previously been a single religious body, such as “the Great Schism” of Christianity in 1054 between Orthodoxy (true faith) in the East and the Roman Catholic Church in the West. Then, the Western Church became highly political and split into a million pieces.
A schismatic is a person who creates or incites schism in an organization or who is a member of a splinter group. Schismatic as an adjective means pertaining to a schism or schisms, or to those ideas or policies that are thought to lead towards or promote schism. In religion, the charge of schism is distinguished from that of heresy, since the offense of schism concerns not differences of belief or doctrine but promotion of, or the state of, division.
However, schisms frequently involve heresy, but it becomes the matter of a political point of view rather than a church law. For instance the Orthodox Church considers the Roman Catholic Church heretical but the Catholic Church says that the Orthodox Church is schismatic. Because the Orthodox Christian Church is not a political organization.
While Christianity was intended as a beautiful religion of peace, some of the schismatic pieces are heretical, politically aggressive and even war-like.
Orthodox Christianity is one of three original true Abrahamic faiths —Orthodox Christianity, Orthodox Judaism and Orthodox Islam. Each has suffered schisms and with each spilt, like cancer cells, the divisions have increased toxicity, chaos and conflict and decreased full unity and peace.
As breaks in a religion increase and church laws or canons are broken in favor of a new branch, the least canonical branches become the most political. While, there are several formal branches of Jewish faith (Reform, Conservative, Orthodox and Reconstructionist Judaism), Zionism is purely political but has somehow retained a religious imprint. This is because Zionism is a product of the British Empire, namely Western intelligence services.
The schisms within Orthodox Christianity today are regional and related to the Catholic Church, such as what has been going on in Ukraine —all orchestrated by Western intelligence services such as America’s CIA and Britain’s MI6. A schism in Orthodox Islam emerged into public consciousness at the end of the 1970s —the Sunnis and Shias. In 1978, the Islamic revolution in Iran, orchestrated, once again by the CIA and MI6, brought politics front and center.
This political strategy of cancerous attack on a faith, religious metastasis, is a fundamental aspect of atheist philosophy as it is applied in the ideologies of Nazism, Bolshevism, and Neoconservatism. It is the basic principle of divide and rule, but applied to a sovereign religion, not a sovereign state.
Zionist Ze’ev Jabotinsky, co-founder of the Jewish Legion of the British army in World War I in Poland, was a journalist who died as Vladimir Jabotinsky in 1940, near Hunter, New York. He founded the militant Zionist Revisionist movement that played an important role in the establishment of the State of Israel. During the 1920s and 1930s, Jabotinsky and his movement were frequently called fascist.
Polish Zionist Jabotinsky and his buddies implemented a staggering number of permutations that did divisive harm to Judaism. At the same time, the permutations enabled Polish Zionism to appeal to a broader base of supporters than any other Jewish political movement. This created an elite leadership that was vastly out of touch with the majority of Jewish people.
Sound familiar? It should. Because Zionism is the living definition of identity politics. It is a perversion. Like “angiogenesis” in a cancer, which is perversion of a normal cellular process, a perversion that is an essential requirement for the development of cancer. Thus, attempts to stop the spread of a cancer in a human body that can easily result in killing the person. The Western intelligence services attack in a political war-like fashion the immune systems of the peaceful Abrahamic religions.
The Transparent Cabal
In his 2008 book, The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel, Stephen J. Sniegoski describes in great detail how Neoconservatives were the driving force behind the Bush administration’s war in Iraq, their motivation was based on their belief that American interests in the Middle East are virtually identical with the Israeli Likud party’s beliefs about Israeli interests in the region, and these mutual interests lie in destabilizing Israel’s adversaries and reconfiguring the environment rather than in the traditional American policy of stabilizing the Middle East.
They began to see McGovern and Carter Democrats and the Nixon and Ford Republicans as insufficiently devoted to anti-communism, military strength, interventionism and Israel and gravitated first to Senator Henry Jackson (D-WA) and then to the Reagan Republicans.
Sniegoski argues that, while the Neoconservatives were the driving force for the war with Iraq in 2003, the basic idea of offensive war to weaken Israel’s neighbors, induce regime change and reconfigure the region has been an element of Zionist thinking since Vladimir Jabotinsky in the 1920s.
The barbaric Zionist Jews that caused the Great Terror remained in power in the Soviet Union until Joseph Stalin had to purge (murder) them. Consequently, U.S. Senator Jackson went on to become the patron saint of those outcasted Soviet Jews and his legacy, while mostly clandestine, can be glimpsed at briefly through the Henry Jackson Society, a Transatlantic foreign policy think tank based in London. Its purpose is “the promotion of liberal democracy across the world,” and it is currently focused primarily on “supporting global democracy in the face of threats from China and Russia.” Importantly, the Henry Jackson Society in England is the sister organization to The Atlantic Council in America, a den of vipers.
“Senator Henry Jackson, the Solzhenitsyn Affair, and American Liberalism,” by Jeff Bloodworth (2006) provides a sanitized version of how Jackson exploited Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn with his anti-communism campaign. Clearly, the CIA was heavily involved and poached Solzhenitsyn as its asset. And it did not go well.
For his “defense of the rights of the Jewish people,” in 1983 an international panel selected the late Senator Henry Jackson as a recipient of the first “Jabotinsky Prize: Shield of Jerusalem” award.
There is a unique historical relationship between capitalism and Jews that is crucial to understanding America. Why Jews have tended to be disproportionately successful in capitalism, the Jewish role in the development of capitalism, and the role of capitalism in the fate of Jews. In a way, Jews unknowingly were the early agents of globalization.
Like today’s web strategists and technologists, Jews were keen on building networks across national borders. And like today’s high-tech entrepreneurs, the global Jewish diaspora managed to utilize this network for their benefit. Who wouldn’t? The relationship is best understood in the context of identity politics and the function of conspiracy inherent to capitalism.
Identity politics in America began in 1973, the year the first volume of Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipeilago was published in the West. In fact, if you take a look at the “Solzhenitsyn affair” which involved Neoconservative U.S. Senator Henry Jackson, President Nixon, Vice President Gerald Ford, the birth of “human rights,” the Helsinki Commission, and the emigration of millions of Soviet Jewry to America, you get a much better understanding of the people who consider themselves to be the elite in U.S. today.
In response to Republican President Nixon, it was Democrat Senator Jackson and House Representative Charles Vanik who passed a bill in 1974 denying the Soviet bloc most favored nation trading status unless it granted Jews freedom to emigrate. The first piece of U.S. legislation inspired by the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” the Jackson‐Vanik amendment has acted as a catalyst in hastening Soviet Jewish emigration policies.
Since the mid-1960s, nearly half a million Jews from the former Soviet Union have settled in the United States. They constitute the largest single group of Jewish immigrants to enter the U.S. since the 1920s. Although they share kinship ties with the many American Jews whose roots are also in the pre-communist Russian empire, their lives have been shaped by different forces: the Bolshevik revolution and life in a communist state. Like American Jews, contemporary emigres are distinguished by high levels of skill and education, are urban and disproportionately professionals. Unlike most American Jews, they have had minimal exposure to formal Jewish training and Jewish religious life, and no experience with a highly organized Jewish community.
This is a tremendous piece of American history. Soviet Jews have been steadily streaming into the U.S. for decades, to the point of even insulting Israel, which campaigned hard on their behalf and had hoped to populate itself with the Jewish emigres. The U.S. has long had an open policy to Jews, which continued even after the Soviets cracked open their borders. Soviet Jews were not forced out due to war, famine or natural disaster and didn’t seek refugee status. This is an important point today. Because some may have been fleeing prosecution for crimes against humanity during the Great Terror.
Enormous resources were invested in this immigration of Soviet Jews by the U.S. Government. Accordingly, Soviet Jews in the U.S. created an ecosystem of prosperity around themselves and the Jews who mass migrated to Israel.
According to Pew, after the fall of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, Israel’s largest wave of Jewish immigrants arrived from Russia and other former Soviet republics. These immigrants far outnumbered those from other countries since Israel achieved statehood. According to Pew, Soviet Jews brought a secular mindset to Israel, and more than two decades later, Jews who were born in the FSU continue to be noticeably less religious than Israeli Jews overall. Secular means atheist: 81% FSU-born Jews in Israel self-identify as secular. Importantly, 25% of Israel’s population is made up of Jews from USSR and these Soviet Jews are running Israel’s Likud government.
We must insert Canada here. Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, Canada has been one of the most active centers of former Soviet Jewish immigration. Toronto has attracted disproportionate numbers of immigrants: over 47% of all new immigrants to Canada have settled in Toronto in the late 1990s. About 70% of former Soviet Jewish immigrants to Canada reside in Toronto. According to the 1996 Canadian census, nationally there were about 16,000 Jews born of Russian/Soviet parents, mostly refugees – arrivals of the 1970s and 1980s.
Toronto is the most Zionist community in the world. Toronto is also an international hot spot for all types of bigotry and heinous hate crimes. Toronto is important to our story for one reason. Zionist operatives there are complete morons, so much so that they exposed with their own incompetence the biggest subversive cultural revolution in the history of the world.
The anti-religious enthusiasm that once galvanized the secular Jews of Russia produced long-lasting results for Jewish immigrants. The religious Jew became “the other.” Thus, identity politics is yet another underhanded attempt to install policies of white supremacy via the tactics of British East India Company, predicated on the “representation” of approved minority individuals who appear as part of the elite class —educated, monied, brainwashed.
Identity politics as a school of thought is Hitler’s racist ideology with a fresh coat of paint. The paint comes from an exclusive manufacturer that gives each paint color the thoughtful name of a Pantone pedigree which can used across global industries with ease.
Zionism is Slippery
Zionism is an especially slippery one, and that is its most marked characteristic.
On November 10, 1975 UN Resolution 3379 passed which defined Zionism as a form of racism and racial discrimination. The Soviet Union originated the idea leading up to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. What national consensus influenced the Soviet Union to take such a step?
Remember, Zionists Jews played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role effectively dominating the Soviet terror regime during its early years and in a genocide of tens of millions of Christians.
In 1975, the UN General Assembly adopted resolution 3379, which “determine(d) that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.” Fifteen years later, on December 16 1991, that resolution was revoked. The UN had defined Zionism as a racist ideology. It was repealed in 1991 when Israel and the U.S. initially refused to participate in the Madrid Peace Conference.
The Madrid Peace Conference, held from October 30 to November 1, 1991, marked the first time that Israeli leaders negotiated face to face with delegations from Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, and, most importantly, with the Palestinians.
The year 1991 was also the year that communism fell. That year and the George H.W. Bush legacy in the Middle East —the Gulf War and the Madrid peace conference— continue to shape U.S. policy in the region a quarter century later.
Most people do not seem to understand that Jewish is not a race. However, how Jewish today is applied has subversively made it one. Jews come in all sizes, shapes and colors including black. A Jew is not just a willow thin white lady with a Harvard degree and a Park Avenue apartment full of Chanel suits who works as a staff writer at the New York Times. The Manhattan doyenne is literally the racist version.
Zionism dictates racial and religious supremacy. Israel, a state built on ethnically cleansed land, thus operates under the veil of a democracy in which the Jewish population is the exclusive beneficiary of the democratic process. However, Israel’s Jewish population is itself stratified within an ethnic hierarchy, where prosperous Ashkenazi (white Jews of European descent) dominate the economy, media and politics. In comparison, Mizrahi and Sephardi (Jews of MENA descent) suffer socio-economic hardship.
If you have ever been to Jerusalem, you know what I am describing. The disparity is shocking. It is like going to the Jim Crow South in America. It is a type of white supremacy. It is racism. It is apartheid, but even worse. It is severe brutality, communist strength brutality. This type of racism means that white lady at the New York Times can write about everybody else and decide on their narratives. Moreover, like anti-Semitism, racism is part of the racket of the Zionist Cultural Revolution.
Racism is all too evident in Israel. Ruling class Zionists cause the hardship that the Mizrahi and Sephardi suffer. Through rhetoric and vitriol they’re able to redirect anger toward African migrant communities who’re victims of greater oppression themselves. It’s a mess, but you never hear about it. The media, the Jerusalem press corps, sees to that.
Zionism is a white, Ashkenazi phenomenon, based on the denial of the Orient and the rights of both Mizrahi Jews and the Palestinians, “the other.” You could call it white supremacy and you’d be right. Solzhenitsyn detailed it in the banned book, 200 Years Together, which documents the mutual understanding between Russians and Jews of the Soviet Union. Solzhenitsyn could have easily been writing about Neoconservatives in America.
The Zionist Cultural Revolution
There’s an uncomfortable similarity between the Zionist Neoconservatives in America —and their dedicated “intelligence community” such as the CIA and the NSA— and the Zionist Bolsheviks who ran the early Soviet terror agencies that committed all of the atrocities: NKVD, Cheka, KGB, and GRU —80% of Stalin’s Soviet government, from bottom to top. Zionists were responsible for The Great Terror and the genocides of tens of millions, “The New Martyrs” —all of those who were martyred in the years of severe persecutions against the faith and the Orthodox Church, which continues in the world for over 70 years in the 21st century.
The persecution started immediately after the 1917 October Revolution, when the Bolsheviks took over. The persecution against the faithful was purposeful and long, and surpassed in cruelty all the previous persecutions against the Church, including those by the Roman emperors in the first, second, and third centuries. The Bolsheviks created an antihuman and criminal ideology to guide rulers for decades. This ideology led to millions of victims, the people of different beliefs and social status. They began with the class struggle against the nobility and merchant class followed by the dispossession of well-to-do peasants, then resettlement and destruction of whole ethnic communities. One destruction campaign followed another and these criminal actions continued for several decades. The Russian Orthodox Church was only one of the targets of that suicidal campaign waged by the authorities against their own people.
The number is unknown, whether it was tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions, because the whole truth about those years will never be revealed. Not all the archives will ever be opened so that the records could reveal who remained faithful to the end and who stumbled. Besides, there are many forgeries in the transcripts of interrogation we use to restore the story of a given new martyr. Some recorded as having renounced their faith did not actually do that.
Revolutions are always atheist in nature. The Zionist cultural revolution is the revolution of revolutions. In fact, it seems to have been modeled on the fall of Byzantium. Atheist revolutionaries spread religious disunity and divide the majority of people as a means to gain political or territorial advantage for a minority of atheists. A revolution can manifest as an inner enemy which appears within the bowels of society to break its spirit, turning the majority into a helpless victim of the minority or suzerainty as it did in Byzantium after nearly twelve hundred years of peaceful living.
I wrote this a year ago: “I am not going to go into detail about the Neocons because there’s really not too much to say beyond the salient fact that they are a deliberately constructed social group, almost like a secret society, that has only one unifying principle: to make money and do it anyway they desire, because when you are morally bankrupt the world is your oyster of possibilities. Neoconservatives identify themselves as whomever is paying them to do so. In layman’s terms, we would call them con artists.”
From a policy perspective, the reference that makes most sense to the Neocons and racist Zionist Jews, in general, is the one instance in our country’s history of American authoritarianism — the one party terror state that was the Jim Crow South — was built on minority rule. The degree of discrimination against blacks under Jim Crow was unparalleled. Yet elite opinion at the time sanctioned it as legally-mandated white supremacy. This is exactly the same kind of warped thinking and public manipulation we see among Neocons today.
The “intelligence community” believes the U.S. was built on this superiority of white men. Their professional culture was shaped by that system. Slavery and Jim Crow may be behind us, and attitudes have no doubt become more open and tolerant over time, but they remain unchanged.
Racist Neoconservatives have run Washington DC this way. The Zionist elite minority and their cult-like war machine. Their think tanks, in particular, should all be abolished like slavery and then segregation was.
What is the difference between the oppressors in the U.S. “intelligence community” and the infamous oppressors of Nazi and Soviet secret police? Nothing. The slightly longer answer to that question is that the Americans are clumsy to the point of incompetence and even more arrogant than the Germans and Russians.
“Stalin’s terror” is, in fact, Zionist terror. Anti-Jewish sentiment is widespread among people of the former USSR because Jews played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role effectively dominating the Soviet terror regime during its early years. In turn, Neoconservatives carried this torch to America and along with the fabricated “war in Iraq” in 2003, lied their way to achieve nearly every war since World War Two.
The use of terror to revolutionize society is an historical precedent established by the Bolsheviks. We need to talk about the bullies in America’s politburo. We need to talk about their exploitation of religion. We need to talk about the British Zionist enterprise —The Saker (Andrei Raevsky) calls this the “AngloZionist Empire” —in relation to America’s alliance with Israel. We need to look at racial trouble in the U.S. and issues like “cancel culture” with respect to the Zionist Cultural Revolution.
U.S. President Trump has encouraged these conversations. You just were not aware that this is part and parcel of “draining the swamp.” He’s turned the British Zionist enterprise upside down. He’s called their bluff. Donald Trump is essentially “containing” Zionism to use a word that the Neocons understand. The Zionism he seeks to contain is the toxic part, the white supremacist ideology. For example, Trump is pushing back against the rising tide of Marxist critical theory. He’s quietly containing the Zionist cultural revolution in America. In order to contain today’s cultural threats, the oppression must be eliminated.
At the same time, Israel is rejecting that political Zionism. Slowly. It’s a process. A very slow one. Apartheid in South Africa was not resolved over night. Apartheid is a cancer in the body politic of the world. One of the largest Christian denomination, the Dutch Reformed Church (NGK), used Christian theology to argue a theological support for the Apartheid regime. The Dutch Reformed Church, with 3 million Christian members, remained the “official religion” of the Apartheid-supporting National Party.
How the Zionist regime and settler colonialism will be brought to an end is an important question to discuss. The clearest and most practical vision to date seems to be that, as in South Africa, the Zionist state will have no choice but to capitulate.
How the Zionist cultural revolution will be brought to an end is the question we all must face if we want to stop the chaos in the world. We need a mutual understanding of the answer.
Live Not By Lies
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn wrote the essay “Live not by Lies” in 1974 on the same day in February that year that secret police broke into his apartment and arrested him. The next day he was exiled to West Germany.
Everybody today knows that the media is a horrific problem. The extent of lying in the press is simply out of control. Now we need to better understand why journalists gesticulate wildly on social media, wave their arms in the air at the New York Times, shout at the crowd from CNNand MSNBC, invent things in the Washington Post, and try to attract the fame and attention they feel they deserve in The Atlantic.
All those years ago, Solzhenitsyn attempted to inform the world that the Bolsheviks committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. And he said the fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the “fourth estate” —the press, the media, and the profession of journalism— is in the hands of the Bolshevik perpetrators. He was warning that the “fourth estate” is the “fifth column.” Today the media is visibly filled with the “intelligence community.” Simply turn on CNN; former intelligence agency officials are now political commentators.
Julian Assange reported that nearly every war that has started in the last 50 years has been a result of media lies. The “intelligence community” has him locked up in a British prison.
The Balfour Declaration was only considered to be a first step that would enable the British Government to entreat the sympathies of world Jewry, for the Entente war effort and a British Palestine. To that end, the Government quickly embarked upon an elaborate and extensive propaganda campaign. This endeavour was undertaken with the ever present advice and work of Britain’s Zionist supporters in London. Together, British officials and Zionists sought to create and disseminate the myth that the Jewish nation was about to be reborn in Palestine under British auspices, which would capture the Jewish imagination but would in no way commit the Government to anything beyond the vague terms of the Balfour Declaration.
This was the sum of British policy towards the Zionist movement for the remainder of the war and the extent of the Anglo-Zionist alliance, as it was originally conceived by the British Government. Journalism has been a British military strategy since 1917.
Journalism in America today is, in fact, Zionist “hasbara” and therefore, by design, is intended to hide the truth. Hasbara is the Israeli word for how Zionists explain to the world through the Jerusalem press corps their slaughter of Palestinians. It is almost never the truth. Zionist propaganda and the most ridiculous lies. The sole purpose of Zionist hasbara is to side step conspiracy.
For example, maybe the biggest historic example, in fact, whenever there’s an attempt to discuss ancient Christianity and its legacy of Eastern Orthodox Christianity —iconoclasm, persecution, martyrdom, and subsequently a massive, Holocaust-like, genocide of Christians— it is shut down in the same manner that Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and others were when speaking of Jews as perpetrators.
Simply put, the Orthodox Christian Church is not a political organization. While the Church is a global body, it does not function like a transnational corporation. Any “power” has been decentralized. Inasmuch as there is no PR, marketing, or even a spokesperson to be found, the Orthodox Church is even without the Madison Avenue language necessary to express the concept of the “New Martyrs” in secular terms.
Christianity has always been anti-imperialistic. Of the currently existing autocephalous Orthodox Churches the most ancient are the Jerusalem, Alexandrian and Antiochian Churches founded by the Holy Apostles. Later, Byzantium, in 330 AD which was pretty peaceful for nearly twelve hundred years. And the ideology of pre-1917 Russia might be described as a kind of “Orthodox monarchism.”
In other words, Christian imperialism exists in the West today in the person of the Pope. In the East, it was and remains a temptation. Orthodox Christianity peacefully held the nations of Byzantium together for twelve hundred years, not imperialism. Since 1453 and the fall of Constantinople, anti-Christian forces worldwide, and destructive forces inside the broader Christian Church itself have carried out the real imperialistic plans.
Christians are the victims of worldwide persecution and this does not minimize the Holocaust nor demonetize Islam. The untold story of the 20th century is the murder of over 50 million Christians, mostly at the hands of communist and Islamic regimes. Christian genocide has continued into the 21st century. In an era when we get get statistics for nearly anything at our fingertips within seconds, some how the number of Christian lives lost to terrorism, war, genocide and mass murder is strangely missing.
It is estimated that the number of Christian martyrs during the 20th century far exceeds that of all the martyrs who died for Christ during the first three centuries of Christianity. Simply combine Christian mass murders worldwide.
- Bosnia (Srebrincha)
- Galicia (Thalerhof)
- Ukraine (Holodomor)
- Global genocide of Orthodox Christians
- Global persecution of Orthodox Christians
- Persecution of Orthodox Christians in Ukraine
The political scientist, adviser and academic who spent more than half a century at Harvard University, Samuel P. Huntington has been credited with forecasting the cultural and religious context in which a 9/11-type incident could emerge. In 1993 Huntington argued that with the collapse of communism, ideological rivalries would no longer drive global affairs. Conflict would occur between groups defined by culture, religion and identity. His thesis was propped up amid NATO’s fresh attacks on the Slavic (Orthodox Christianity) fraternity.
Huntington is the Zionist cult scholar who inspired “Israel Lobby” book by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. Another Zionist cult political scientist Zbigniew Brzezinski (the father of corporate media maven Mika Brzezinski), back in 1997, in his book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives wrote: “After the victory over communism, we need a split of Orthodoxy and the breakdown of Russia, and Ukraine, where betrayal is the norm of public morality, will help us in this.”
When Zionist Brzezinski died, Zionist Radek Sikorski, the former foreign minister of Poland and “a distinguished statesman at the Brzezinski Institute on Geostrategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies” wrote a very telling love letter to “Zbig” in the Washington Post. Zionist Sikorski is married to an American columnist, Zionist Anne Applebaum. Applebaum and her husband serve as British foreign agents of influence. Lucas is British. Are Sikorski and Applebaum the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg of the 21st century? Communists? Maybe not, but they have not been playing for Team USA. Applebaum has spent the better part of her dreadful writing career trashing the conservative Catholic majority of Poland, which is literally all of Poland. The country is at least 93% Roman Catholic in faith. Also, Anne Applebaum heavily plagiarized Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (several books worth) and censored out the parts incriminating the cabal of atheist Jews and the Anglo-American “intelligence community” or their unspeakable crimes in Soviet Russia, so there’s that.
According to U.S. President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser, Brzezinski, after the collapse of communism, the Zionist West’s main opponent became the Orthodox Christian Church. The Balkan wars manufactured by NATO in the late 1990s were a manifestation of this concept. Samuel Huntington peddled an international conspiracy theory that became the cornerstone of NATO after the fall of the USSR.
I wrote this a year ago and it has taken me that long to get the full depth and vastness of the terror: “Remember, the true religions prevent the New World Order, that is the crux here. With that in mind, you should know, if you don’t already, that Orthodox Christianity is the truest form of Christianity. It just is. Don’t argue with me, just accept it. Here comes the worse part. After the devastation that NATO caused in Serbia in the 1990s people started to notice a pattern with NATO operations after the second World War, specifically that the Alliance was bombing Christians. For a person like me, I don’t normally think in such terms so that before the recent crisis in Ukraine, I myself brushed it off as a conspiracy theory. Well, guys, it is not.”
If you turn your eyes to a think tank (read shit hole) in DC, the Center for European Analysis(CEPA), which is a National Endowment for Democracy (NED) spinoff and initially directed by Zbigniew Brzezinski and Madeline Albright, you can arrive at the current day. You will find Ben Hodges at CEPA. Also, Anne Applebaum and CEPA’s Edward Lucas crowned themselves the king and queen of “disinformation” when the crisis in Ukraine broke out. It’s a small world, huh?
Zionist Albright spelled out the first two decades of the new millennium in 1998: “As we prepare to undertake NATO’s first post-Cold War expansion next spring, prior to the Summit, the Alliance is considering its vision for the future, and initiatives critical to preparing NATO for the 21st century.” The transparent cabal have focused on so-called “disinformation.” Check out Albright’s speech at the Atlantic Council in 2017 regarding the alleged threat of “digital disinformation.”
Life is full of disinformation, it’s called lying.
Tintin in the Land of the Soviets
The very first adventure of one of the world’s most beloved cartoon characters.
If someone would give me a handsome book deal, I’d love to do a children’s book or even young adult franchise in tribute to 1929 publication, “Tintin in the Land of the Soviets” and Belgian cartoonist Hergé, where Tintin discovers the truth about the Bolsheviks, specifically the theft of the country’s wealth by its leadership.
Listen, Vladimir Lenin was a grifter who exploited the Jews. This is a simple and easily understandable message that we ought to convey broadly. In fact, in the original book, Tintin stumbles upon the secret cache of riches that Stalin, Lenin, and Trotsky have stolen from the Soviet people.
Armed with this knowledge, Tintin flees Russia with his faithful dog called Snowy returning safely to Belgium and is greeted with great pomp by the rapturous public. The ending to my book would be just as magnificent as the original. Because in my book the pathological hatred for President Trump, the Neoconservative fifth column and their think tanks in our nation’s capital would be really explosive.
I would update the story for 2020 in America and my character would visit “the Land of the Neoconservatives.” Because the Bolsheviks —Stalin, Lenin, and Trotsky— were a British cabal in Russia just like the Neoconservatives are today in America. A sneaky fifth column of total frauds supported by the same dark financial structure in the City of London, in the interest of the global elite. I might even use the phrase “Davos Man” Samuel P. Huntington penned in a paper about elites and “an emerging global superclass” of “Davos men” or “gold-collar workers.”
I am actually quite serious. The mutual understanding is one that we ought to be teaching kids as soon as they can understand that conspiracy is a part of modern life. Importantly, convey the message that conspiracy aims to divide us and is a most always blamed on the victim.
No, the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 was not a Jewish plot. In fact, kids ought to learn about the function of economic conspiracies and the political perversion of the religions so they don’t grow up to be adults who fall for hate propaganda and deceitful intellectual ideologies.
To find unity, let’s bring conspiracy out of the shadows.
While Solzhenitsyn’s work was a significant contribution to such mutual understanding, many were offended by his suggestion that some Jews also need to come to terms with their sins. I take a different stand, maybe because I have the benefit of hindsight and luxury of progress. I say we need to look at ourselves. Look within U.S. foreign policy. Look at the trillions of dollars that America has sent in aid to fund the Israel project. Don’t blame the “Jooz.”
I believe that we are at an important crossroads of knowledge. It is time for everybody to take a closer inspection in the mirror to reflect on how we arrived here, in order to fully shift the understanding internally. The mirror reveals it all, crystal clear, if we’re willing to look.
There are plenty of other people who understand the depth and breath of Solzhenitsyn’s message. Kim R. Holmes, the Executive Vice President, at The Heritage Foundation is one of them. Read his excellent article, which sort of dovetails my own. And read writer (and Jazz saxophonist) Gilad Atzmon regarding the U.S. military-industrial complex. “America is willing to sacrifice its young soldiers and national interests and even its economy for Israel,” writes Atzmon. Also, get familiar with the plight of the Torah Jews. They are my team! Finally, always read Andrei Raevsky (The Saker), and here is one he wrote for The Unz Review.
Our awareness of Alexander Solzhenitsyn seems to have been awakened following Ukraine’s coup d’état in 2014 that was backed by Washington, when several Russian-language publications decided to revisit Solzhenitsyn’s statements about the two neighboring countries made throughout his life. After all, he foretold today’s Ukrainian crisis.
The veil of the mutual understanding was lifted in Ukraine. Did Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn change the course of either the East or the West? Maybe not back then. But his words have had residual impact since the Harvard speech, for certain, and we are only now really starting to appreciate them as we should, four decades later.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn spoke of a “moral revolution” that would move beyond the excesses of modernity, yet without returning to the spiritual despotisms of the past. Because he instinctively knew that the so-called “intelligence community” was up to no good and was scheming to split peaceful religions and society, in general. The Bolsheviks had relied on those covert actions. And ascetic religions were and are the enemy of the “intelligence community,” back then and now, because these religious practices allow a man to take control of himself in a powerful way, to think for himself.
Thus, the immediate threat to American national security is our military-industrial complex and specifically its intelligence agencies that pervert religions around the world. Alexander Solzhenitsyn said it all those years ago at Harvard. But he used words we did not understand at the time. Because we were not prepared to hear them.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn understood that spiritual genocide, a cancer resulting from a system, like communism, can be not only be difficult to recognize—and many people are entirely unaware that this type of terror even exists.
Let’s try internal realization instead of finger pointing. When we seek knowledge about the world’s damaged bullies through compassion and understanding, we will eventually come to a state of full unity through mutual understanding. This is what Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn tried.
They need to understand that we know. We need to understand that they are human.
Solzhenitsyn sought to encourage a mutual understanding between Russians and Jews. He even cooperated with the CIA until it became clear that they like the Jewish politburo in the Soviet government were equally as perverted, equally as corrupted from their original course.
The mutual understanding is that the peaceful religions have been been perverted for the purpose of terror. We only now can begin to understand all of this. Because we are finally having a spiritual awakening in America.
On a policy level, this leads to better decision making. Because humility fosters critical thinking. It is also important in ending wars and in conflict resolution. It enables a policy where a nation is more likely to accept that it wrongfully provoked war. And this kind of public policy starts with education of the very young.
“It’s a universal law — intolerance is the first sign of an inadequate education. An ill-educated person behaves with arrogant impatience, whereas truly profound education breeds humility,” said Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.
Nicholas Molodyko is a writer in Chicago who writes about Western popular culture and politics in relation to the secret history of the Eastern religions. After writing professionally in the fields of public health research and international development, while working in Europe, Asia and Africa, he is now writing independently at Mediapart in France.
Herge was a notorious Belgian fascist belonging to the Christus Rex party of Leon Degrelle. Degrelle was of course the “son the Fuehrer never had” – the most decorated Nazi soldier of WWI. Read carefully: over 400000 potential Nazis were prosecuted in Belgium after the war.
I am not for lionising Lenin but will make sure that the Catholic Nazi propaganda which had worked so hard to bring the Tsar down doesn’t get to write the history of Russia’s tragedy.
They’ve had decades of a head start Ken, unfortunately. But snippets of information here and there can be pieced together, concerning that period between 1914 and 1927 when the Vatican was actively involved in Russia’s near destruction.
Yes, but according to my information, there was a honeymoon between 1918 and 1923 when the Vatican saw the Bolsheviks as the destroyers of the Russian Orthodoxy. Note that Mussolini and Hitler started popping up once the Pope realised that RCC would not get a special treatment within the USSR. You know about the Collegium Russicum (1929?) and the “black parachutists” (d’Herbigny et al.)?
You’re welcome. I used to know quite a fair amount about the Collegium Russicum and the ”Black parachutists”, the attempt to organize a new church under the Vatican’s jurisdiction out of the ashes of Orthodoxy. Once that failed, the decision to destroy everything and start over apparently was an easy one.
That the Vatican was directly or indirectly involved in Russia’s near destruction can be taken for granted, bearing in mind it started it’s anti-Russian and anti-Orthodox campaign back in the 13th century, when it supported the invasion of Russia by German knights, who were defeated by Alexander Nevsky.
When it comes to this article, I am afraid that it cannot be fully accepted, because of the following statements:
“Most people do not seem to understand that Jewish is not a race”. I am afraid not. The author avoids the use of the word “Khazar”. Most people still do not know who the Khazars were. They were a Turkish nomadic tribe who in the Middle Ages left Asia and arrived in what is today southern Ukraine and Russia, where they established their kingdom, being surrounded by Orthodox Russians and Muslim Turks. In order to avoid assimilation, they converted to the Hebrew faith, becoming Jews overnight. Their Kingdom was destroyed by a combined Russian/Persian military force, and only after their racist ideology, based on superiority, became known.
“No, the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 was not a Jewish plot”. I am afraid it was. The word “Jewish” needs to be substituted for the word “Khazarian”. The so-called “revolution” of 1917 was Khazarian revenge for the destruction of their Khazarian Kingdom. The Tsar was executed, apparently in a most brutal manner. The millions of Russians who perished during the First World War, during the “revolution”, during the Red Terror, during the Civil War and during the Second World War were perfidious, brutal acts of genocide, the intent of the Khazars to recreate their Khazarian Kingdom. They, of course, needed Russian land. After the coup d’etat in Kiev in 2014, Ukraine was flooded by Zionist “businessmen”, who were evaluating land in southern Ukraine.
“Because the Bolsheviks —Stalin, Lenin, and Trotsky— were a British cabal in Russia just like the Neoconservatives are today in America”. A remarkable and unacceptable statement. Yes, Lenin and Trotsky were brought to Russia to start their “revolution”. Lenin was brought from Switzerland in a German train, which should not be surprising, as German Army Intelligence was penetrated by Anglo/Americans, who used Zionists in Germany, while Trotsky was brought to Russia from New York City. He brought with him 500 New York criminals, who became “Bolsheviks”. He came to Russia via Canada and was, in fact, arrested by Canadian police, but released after Washington DC intervened. However, to state that Stalin was part of the British cabal in Russia is outrageous. I don’t know how many disinformation articles I have read on Stalin, where the authors tried to portray him as a “freemason” and a “Zionist”, which is absurd, bearing in mind what happened to Trotsky. Additional proof that Stalin was not a “freemason” and “Zionist” lies in the fact that he took over from Lenin in 1924, while in 1925 an obscure character by the name of Adolf Hitler appears in Germany. The Zionist bankers knew that with Stalins appearance they lost control of Russia, and hence their proxy fighter Adolf Hitler was given the task of starting World War Two and invading Russia. His “economic miracle” in Germany and his military were financed by the Bank of International Settlements, which was opened in Basel in 1931, two years before he was appointed Chancellor. We must not forget to mention the investments which Wall Street made in German industry after World War One.
And the situation today ? A highly ironic one. The US today is in the same situation Russia was in 1917, prone to severe political, social and financial troubles. In trying to invade and break up Russia, the Anglo-Zionists have seen their plans being resurrected in the US, and maybe even in Britain, as both are facing potential political implosion and breakup. As the old saying goes, it’s a turning world.
Generally agree with you. Just one correction – Hitler made his first mark in 1923, having attempted a putsch in Munich (the beer garten putsch). He was later tried and sentenced to five years, but served only about nine months in prison.
Herge who wrote Tintin? Wow..
But apart from Tintin in the Congo (which many say was actually written by someone else, not Herge) the other Tintins don’t seem fascist at all… very anti imperial Japan (Blue Lotus) and very supportive of native South American culture (Prisoners of the Sun, seven crystal balls)…
Degrelle was a crusading journalist and politician in pre-war Belgium, where he became a friend of Hergé, who based his Tintin drawings on Degrelle.
In 1935 Degrelle founded the Rexist Party, which campaigned against corruption in Belgian politics and for a revival of traditional Catholicism.
After the initial German advances into Belgium and France in 1939-40, and the later outbreak of war with Stalin’s Soviet Union, Degrelle founded what became the Wallonien Division of the Waffen SS, recruiting anti-communists to fight on the Eastern Front.
So let me reiterate (not that it matters): Herge modelled his “young European” reporter on the notorious Nazi Degrelle who was one of the leading Waffen SS commanders in Russia and became his personal friend.
Everything that you say about Hegé and Degrelle is undoubtedly true. However, the comic books of Tin Tin are another matter. It is like saying that Agatha Christie was a Fascist and that her books prove it. :-)
One of the books of Hergé explains very nicely how oil companies and armament companies operated. How they instigated wars to grab oil fields or to sell arms to both sides of a conflict. I think that is as true today as it was in the 1930’s.
“As aide-de-camp, Tintin opposes the proposed decision of San Theodoros claiming the supposedly oil rich Gran Chapo, as this would cause a war between San Theodoros and neighboring Nuevo Rico, and he is framed as a traitor by warmongering oil and weapon companies”
My aim was not to smear Tintin (although I always found the whole paradigm strange and somewhat autistic). Are you saying that Herge’s early opus is not open to criticism? Dame Agatha might as well have been fascist – why create a Belgian hero otherwise? Just joking.
I’m not sure how to interpret your – well, he might have been best pals with Degrelle but… statement. Surely that matters more than what he drew in the 1960s when “Europe” was fighting hard to bury its shameful past.
Let’s get this straight. So you are happy with Belgium becoming a “multicultural” haven? Something those who you call Fascists would never have allowed to happen.
Belgium has turned into an open sewer my dear sir. You can call it Socialist or Democratic or whatever but that fact is inescapable. I am not really interested in “isms”. I am much more interested in the consequences.
Oh, I’m all for Fascisms, Nazisms, Rexisms as long as they remain within your borders – which they never do. Rather, they are the apex of corporate SUPRANATIONAL imperialism that always end up killing millions in the East. I don’t mind your worshiping your global religious corporation as long as it withdraws from the borders of Russia and starts paying attention to what Christ actually said.
Remind me, why was Belgium created in the first place? I wish the Belgians all the best but after the horrible crimes in the Congo… I suspect some suffering is in order.
“I suspect some suffering is in order.”
So the ethnic Belgians of today must pay for the sins of their ancestors? An interesting perspective. And the same presumably applies to the British, French, Dutch, Portuguese, Americans, Jews and so on? That is an awfully big bill. :-)
I am really glad to be in Eastern Europe at present. The people seem to have a clear idea of what they do not want. But some governments are corrupt and have other ideas. Anyway, there are no handouts to boat people or whatever and ministers who try to stop illegal immigration are not sentenced to prison like in Italy.
In your obsession with the West you fail to see the essence. It is not the “Eastern Europeans” that are asking for a global war. It is not the poor migrants (however unpleasant they might be to you). Yes, the British, French, Dutch, Americans (let’s keep the Jews out of this for a second) are all involved in pushing for a world-ending war from the Mark Dutroux- friendly NATzO headquarters. Are you aware of the fact that Belgium is the centre of the Western darkness for a reason? Once you wake up to this and start dismantling the apparatus of terror in your own country, everything else will be peachy. I promise you a tomorrow full of promise.
Here, Alfred, in case you want to acquaint yourself with the glory that is Herge.
Didn’t stop the Russophobe Spielberg from making a c….. film – never mind that Degrelle would have had him turned into a lampshade.
For some reason, they discuss another Roman Catholic shill from the Jewish Hollywood. Angelina Jolie, the daughter of the leading Catholic activist Martin Sheen.
Apologies, Jon Voight – Sheen deserves his own chapter.
Just a thought….. I don’t know anything about the people you two are discussing. However I am fascinated by the idea Ken Leslie refers to when he states that the hurtful and destructive actions of the Belgian state will return to it….. God knows, it has done enough. Of course, so has Canada, the US, England, France, Australia, Japan….. and the list goes on almost forever…. including Stalin, Lenin, Bush….. and again the list could go on forever.
The idea of the consequences of the action returning to the doer is summed up neatly by the Christian idea “As you sow, so shall you reap.” In other parts of the world it goes under the name of the Law of Karma. It has always had the ring of truth and rationality to me. Certainly as an idea it is powerful enough to influence the lives of many millions of people now and throughout history. It is more than just an idea of retribution, but seems to me to see the world/universe/human life as essentially deeply moral and rational at its core. So the results of the action coming back to the doer is to function as corrective, to bring a person back to a decent and moral path, and eventually bring the person to God.
So, yes, countries (many people acting in concert) will face a reckoning for what they have done, just like any individual will. Now, this is all speculation, but it is worth considering.
That last photo depicts Degrelle feeding poison to the new generations of Spaniards under the auspices of Otto von Habsburg’s fascist CEDADE (part of the Le Cercle network). He should have been shot like a dog but there you are.
I humbly apologise to wonderful dogs for suggesting something so cruel. He should have been shot in the back of the head by comrade Sudoplatov – like a rabid Nazi that he was.
Stunned and shaken by this revelation Ken.
Thanks for enlightening.
I did a quick search it appears Tintin and the Soviets, Tintin in Congo, and Tintin in America were the 3 early books that were specifically written as conservative propaganda for children. The other Tintin’s were more researched…After this I can never look at Tintin again with the same eyes.
Oh, please, I’m sorry, I’ve done something I would hate having done to me. Herge was not necessarily a bad person – he later repudiated his early views. I just need to act quickly to counter the propaganda.
My greatest disappointment? Grandmaster Hermann Huppen, the creator of Andy Morgan, Jeremiah etc. whom I’d been following since childhood – sided with Bosnian Muslims during the war. I do still read him (with reservations).
No please Ken, I am grateful, truly. It’s always good to know about these things. As you say, we may still enjoy some of the work- with reservations…thanks and be well, Ken!
Note that both are from Belgium, both belonged to the Habsburgian “pan-European” culture push post WWII, both are Roman Catholics and both published works denigrating Russians/Serbs/Soviets.
Sometimes I wonder if it’s not “poor little Belgium”, rather than Germany, that is the European heart of darkness. From its ultra-Montanism, the butcher Leopold, Degrelle and other Nazis to NATO and other assorted institutions of the Fourth Reich safely ensconced there, various high-level paedophile scandals and so on… the place definitely deserves special attention.
All the way back to the ”Spanish Netherlands” and the Jesuit persecution of the ”Jansenists” there and in France.
Thank you, Vladimir,
I don’t want to hijack the thread but it is so obvious – Herge’s propaganda piece chimes in with Edmund Walsh’s views of the USSR at that time (discussed in a previous piece).
You are absolutely right – the particular flavour of evil emanates from the days of Spanish Netherlands. I need to learn more. It’s interesting that Konrad Korzeniowski talked about the Heart of Darkness in the context of Belgium’s crimes in Congo.
It is also not surprising that the heart of the post-WWII Catholic Nazi reactionary apparatus (Cercle) was particularly active there. Look, I give people a great secret society but they don’t want to know!
Yes, there’s no need of ”hijacking” anything; the gentleman has said what he has said and should be given a fair hearing. But it would not be the first time that poor information given someone by an authority figure they trusted skewed one’s perspective…
Le Cercle is definitely a spooky outfit, connected to the Habsburgs and others, but as you say some do not want to see this. It hits too close to the heart of what the West really is and where it issues forth from.
It’s like the usual canards leveled against the Jews/Zionists; they have a symbiotic yet love/hate relationship with them. Many for example know of the infamous ”Protocols of the Elders of Zion” (which says the Papacy and the Aristocracy is the main bulwark against their nefarious plans…) but few know of a similar forgery printed by the Jesuits with an weirdly similar title; ”The Protocols of the Elders of La Bourg-Fontaine”… But from the 1600’s and with Jansenist conspirators instead of Jewish ones.
Yes, very important to keep repeating this. You are right about what the late D. B. called the Jews and the Jesuits dialectic. One is not allowed to act independently of it – well, I am.
As am I, to the best of my ability.
This reminds me of a comment I encountered at Andrei Martyanov’s blog that somehow claims ‘turning the other cheek’ is fake Christianity and that ‘an eye for an eye’ is more consistent. The commentator held the Red Army’s killing of Nazi soldiers as an example. (I’m not sure if it’s a good one – how much of the Red Army was Christian?)
What is the official position of the Russian Orthodox Church when it comes to ‘turning the other cheek’ VS. ‘an eye for an eye’?
esoteric answer abbreviated: ” eye for eye” is left brain solution, “turn the other cheek” which was spoken by the Master of Metaphor of his time was about creative resolution i.e. right brain. Neither obviates the other but the more “spiritual” hence long lasting on is the one coming from the right brain.
Look at the metaphor : when someone facing you strikes you ( most people are right handed ) it will hit your left side of your face… and if you respond in the same manner the conflict goes on and on in the same way .
It has nothing to do with pacifism but it has lots to do with prayer, taking things to another level of being, before reacting. This I think is what Putin does even though of course he acts according to political, strategic necessity for the best solution.
Well, regarding pacifism, I’m pretty sure part of that involves not inflicting harm towards an innocent population. Especially when said population is not involved in the crimes committed by their respective governments.
This is an excerpt of what the comment in question said, as the crux of the issue:
If the hostility toward Putin were not bad enough already, the comment ends with an F-bomb-laden ad hominem towards a previous commentator who believed “an eye for an eye” was a pagan worldview.
Very enjoyable read, although the part about Trump and the Apartheid State may cause a run of TDS here, if he’d stop giving away Palestinian lands he has no right to, one might, big might, think Trump is on the right tack of corralling militant zionism………………okay, I’m awake now.
If anyone can answer us
What is the actual number of Russians killed under the bolsevik and communist systems? The one that were officially given by the authorities, “allowed explorer” Dr. Cohen data or Solzenicin – CIA data? Why have not still archives opened to check the accuracy of the numbers? Why is Lenin still under the walls of the Kremlin and not buried?
“Stalin is evil and communism doesn’t work” forms the axiomatic foundation of modern Western intellectualism, so there is little point in debating it either way.
Always interesting to see folks ranting and raving about the evil commies while conspicuously neglecting that the intellectual developments of Marx & Engels, Lenin, Stalin were continued by Mao, Deng, Xi and has culminated in the most advanced civilization on the planet in 2020.
Following confused grifters like Solzhenitsyn will only lead to more confusion (see modern Solzhenitsyn disciple Jordan B. Peterson).
It would be interesting if you could amplify on your remarks, especially as Solzhenitsyn was no friend of the West in a spiritual and cultural sense.
Solzhenitsyn was a great friend and strategic asset to the Western Empire (see Nobel Prize and the praise lavished on him internally by the CIA). This does not mean he sought to totally assimilate on a personal basis, for doing so would be a great blow to his carefully crafted image as “the disillusioned Soviet”.
The “turncoat-in-progress” is a popular, and lucrative, trope among charlatans, or as we now call “grifters”.
Contemporary examples from America, with the disillusioned X character they are playing in quotes: James Comey (“Trump ally”), John Bolton (“Trump ally”), Barack Obama (socioeconomically “black”), Jordan Peterson (“academic”), Tim Pool (“leftist”), Dave Rubin (“leftist”), John Kasich (“Republican”), Ai Weiwei (“Chinese”), Alexey Navalny (“Russian”), and so on…
Well, that is to say that even I never fully trusted his accounts or numbers, as he himself said once that he was writing a novel (”Gulag Archipelago”) not a statistical treatise.
That being said, many people died at the hands of God-fighting monsters, people who would have been more than happy to have contributed in the work of building a better society but who were shot for being Orthodox Christians, for being ”Counter-revolutionaries”. The Soviet Union failed because it was Atheist, not because it was Socialist.
The Soviet Union was destroyed in a clash of global hegomonies. It did not “fail” in a vacuum due to internal contradictions (though they did exist and play a role).
As we have seen with Solzhenitsyn, Western strategists played a dominant role in legitimizing and disseminating his anti-USSR narratives. It was all part of the hybrid war–cultural, economic war.
The defeat (not failure) of the USSR gave us 30 years of global neoliberal hegemony.
Religious tradition had little to no impact in the prior clash of hegemonic powers. Both sides had a diversity of religious tradition, including atheistic top-strategists from Kissinger to Gorbachev. The primary ideological conflict was, nominally, Capitalist vs. Worker–how should the inevitable global economy be structured?
[Normally, the producing worker will always outlast the consuming capitalist, but all bets were off in light of the dramatic technological innovations of the 20th century (nitrogen fixation, refrigeration, communications technology, space travel, synthetics, computation).]
I cannot help but discern that you are incorrect as to the influence of the impact of religious tradition on the outcome of the Cold War, as the Iranian Revolution and the work of Pope John Paul II in Poland weakens that argument considerably.
It’s not just that Atheistic Socialism fails; Atheistic anything whatsoever fails.
Calumniating Solzhenitsyn has become an industry of the diehard ‘sovoks’. It shows that Russia has still a long way to come to what Solzhenitsyn called for: ‘Repentance’.
I am not one who is particularly against Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and repentance is something that can heal both the collective and personal memories, but not all that happened between 1917 and 1991 was bad. There indeed is a deeper repentance that Solzhenitsyn alluded to as being necessary, a repentance for the murder of about 15 million ”Old Believer” Orthodox Christians over a period of over 300 years by the Romanovs and their forces, and repentance for the Raskol itself, cutting Russia off from what she and her saints had believed before and from the best people in Russia.
Tsar Peter and his father Alexei were the first ”Bolsheviks” in Russia, and Lenin was their spiritual descendant.
In case you are still following this thread, let me explain why I sometimes seem to defend socialist USSR (for all its egregious errors):
– Russia is being attacked in all its forms – I aim to defend it in all its forms. Failing to do so gives Russia’s enemies an edge.
– It is not hard once one discounts the crude propaganda by Conquest et al. I remain furious with Lenin for crippling Russia in 1917 and imposing Bolshevik terror. Cognitive dissonance, yes, and so what?
– I am genuinely grateful for the great sacrifice of WWII and the liberation of many nation from the yoke of backwardness and imperialism.
Does this make sense?
Absolutely it does, speaking as an Orthodox Christian who politically and socio-economically favors Socialism. Lenin and his Bolsheviks in 1917 swept away much that was good in Russia because of their militant Atheism, but in 1941, Russia awoke from her comatose state, finding herself in mortal peril, and remains today still fighting for life.
It’s a seeming paradox that Lenin and Stalin both saved Russia and all but almost destroyed Russia, but after watching many videos over the years from gentlemen like Professor Andrei Fursov, it makes perfect sense.
Excellent succinct analysis as always.
I think it is important for both believers and communist followers atheists to know the exact number of their folk victims. I don’t think they deserve to be played with. I don’t believe that they were in a hurry like the Nazis and didn’t manage to keep statistics. Topic is still shrouded in secrecy. Why, if we are talking about a progressive Russia of opened face to the whole world. Isn’t it important that they first open up to their people on what they can build a new foundation? So far they have had enough time to exaggerate what they could. Solzenizin’s figures of millions come to me unobjective, under the CIA bias.
Let the friends, families, and neighbors mourn and seek justice. Any attempt to *dig up old graves* for political points is misguided.
There are countless examples of mass murders being downplayed or exaggerated. Instead of focusing on reducing everything to a score, we should seek to understand the conditions that led to the alleged mass murder and thus prevent them.
Perhaps our African readers (wish there were more) would like to comment on that masterpiece of humanist anthropology “Tintin in the Congo”? The only thing that bothered Herge was that the USSR could not be turned into a Congo, ready for rape, plunder and limb chopping by the sub-Habsburg haemophiliacs of Belgium.
Considering what a previous text spoke about Judaism, I am skeptical that only Zionism is the problem…
Furthermore, the (criminal, yes) State of Israel must be severely curtailed, but on the other hand its existence allows for greater symbolic maneuvering by other global actors, by Christians, Muslims, Buddhists etc around the Jewish question.
A personal bugaboo of mine is the term ‘Abrahamic religion’ — as a Christian, my faith is not ‘Abrahamic’ but ‘Melchizadic’. Otherwise, fascinating reading. Thanks
Jesus struggled with His Identity, but He was sure in His Faith. That Faith was Abrahamic. The belief that Abram answered YHVH’s call and received a Promise of which He was an Hier. The Priest King was a Christ figure, Abraham was not perfect and needed a Priest , Christ was perfect and had no need for a Priest. You my friend are not Melchizadek.
We are very few who do not tow the politically correct party line of the ‘Abrahamic religions’. An attempt at clarification of this matter, with all the grounding in the Scriptures, was not tolerated and was censored.
Forgive me for the noise. I suppose I was trying to be clever and have a knee jerk reaction. But yes, The importance of Abraham is not according to the ancestral lineage, but by his example which is what the foundational texts (Psalms, Letter to the Hebrews) say. I just think the term is the map not to be confused with the the territory. Is it all because of Lessing’s Nathan der Weisse and a Pollyanna desire for commonality?
St John of Damascus had his own, slightly different typology as mentioned in this following article:
I don’t know Alek from Adam ,but The Scythe is in the Hand of The Reaping Angel. I sense in my soul that an Holy Indictment coming from On High in the near future. Ouch! How The Mighty are Fallen. Oh how the Plains rejoice , when the Mountains are brought Low. Hero worship is one letter from zero. You do the Math.
Here are a few random thoughts about this article.
The author seems not to be aware of the fact that, despite the opposition of Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt and many prominent American Jews, the fascist wing won in 1948…no doubt with the help of the British fascist and US fascist sympathizers who’d favored Hitler to destroy the USSR all along, and to reestablish the British Empire. Agreed that Balfour and the Rothschilds were criminally responsible. But they represented the 1%, not the rest of humanity, nor Jewry. The Jews were the vector for the British to have a beachhead in oil rich Middle East.
In my opinion, my boomer generation of Jews, whose parents were traumatized, as well as the whole post WWII generation, bought into Zionism and Israel as a refuge from centuries of persecution, but hey,most older Americans buy into American Exceptionalism, too. Not to mention Christian apocalyptic Zionists.
As regards, Jewish Bolshevism, here is an illuminating article pointing out the canard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Bolshevism. How many Jews were in charge back then? Take a look.
It’s kind of miraculous that the evil atheistic Commies, whose evil Jewish atheist henchmen killed, according to this narrative, tens of millions of Russians, did not incur the wrath of God, but prevented the Nazis, from taking over the world. How could that be? They’re atheists. And Soviet people hated Stalin, right? Wrong.
Here is a song by Jewish partisans:
“And life to the Red Army and to Comrade Stalin”
Speaking as someone raised in a Jewish family and who went to a Zionist summer camp for 11 years, I started seeing through the Jewish victimhood narrative and concluded that the Zionists really were a problem. Indeed, the whole “One God”, narrative stopped making sense when I was 16. Why do Monotheists always fight with each other over their particular interpretation?
The author appears to think that secular Jews are a problem. However, Israeli authorities are worried because many young Israelis often leave Israel in disgust after ‘serving’ in the military. How do I know? I have talked with them.
“Zionism is a failure and just a way for the government to control the people”. So said a young Israeli I met in Thailand. Another Israeli who lives in India said, “The idea that a patch of land belongs to one people is….ridiculous”. They’re leaving Israel having seen through the narrative.
Unfortunately, many Israelis are indeed totally brainwashed by the victimhood narrative. Gilad Atzmon expat Israeli has noted this in detail. 90% of Americans are too, about The Land of the Free and Home of the Brave.
Much of Solzhenitsyn’s work has been identified as fiction coming out of his own personal idea. The centuries of pogroms and blood libels against Jews were all the result of usury by some but hardly all Jews. So why the stereotype? Jewish bankers killed Jesus, who were exploiting Jews too, right?
Putin got it right. He equates anti semitism and Russophobia, whenever narrowminded people have a problem, it’s the fault of the Jews, or the Russians. Always somebody else’s fault.
In conclusion, I find such articles somewhat useful, however, there appears also to be a fair amount of distortion and stereotypical thinking. A mix of facts and non facts.
Well, as Nietzsche said, “Human, all too human”
I expect to be either ignored or skewered for writing this.
On the contrary to your concluding paragraph, you make many salient points (though ideologues will take issue with that). Regards.
In this excellent review by The Saker, (The Tartar falcon, as that bird is called in Scandinavic) I must take an exception to this stement of his:
“Jews come in all sizes, shapes and colors including black.”
Maybe not wrong, butt missing one point:
There was a Jewish community in the Chinese capital of Kāifēng — as it’s named now — from before the year 600 anno domini.
After 1980, a lot of them emmigrated to Palestine, and most settled in villages in the then newly-occupied areas of Israël, Samaria and Judeah.
But how many remained in China, and how many US and other Jews did not returne to Shànghǎi and other centres of influence in Mainland China, Hòngkóng and Macau? — worth pondering!
Several ov Solsjenitsjin’s works were available “behind the counter” and thru “Reference News” (fairly easily available foreign translations of Western Media coverage) even in my years there at the end of the so-called “Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution” even before 1976. Maybe because they were deemmed to be anti-Sovyet??
No, not some nebulous conspiracy of “bankers” and “socialists” – here is the great Roman Catholic (possibly crypto-Jew) partnyor of Russia, the sub-fascist Viktor Orban calling the monument to the 80000 Red Army soldiers who liberated Hungary – “a monument to Russian occupation”.
The hyenas who drank blood of the Serbs and other Slavs in WWI and II show their true colours.
I always wondered if there was a direct line between Victor Orban and either Admiral Horthy and/or the Arrow Cross Fascists of Hungary, my friend. Here’s an article that suggests to me that the idea isn’t impossible;
I really wanted to believe that he was “different” on account of fighting Soros. However, he just went on to confirm my point from “Crampus”: Just because someone hates Soros, does not mean they are your ally.
Indeed. There’s a reason why Soros was chosen as a middleman, or should I say; ”cutout”.
I think I get your gist but please do elaborate. We need to shed light on these vampires.
Soros is compromised by his obvious collaboration with the Nazis against his own people in WWII, and yet, he has never been touched by them, he is in fact untouchable (almost proof in itself that they aren’t the top string-pullers) and I believe is just a ”bagman” handling funds from others higher up in the global hierarchy. We are allowed to see him; and some confusedly think he’s near the top of the conspiracy of anonymous forces in this world. He is not.
I agree 100% percent. Those that have put the CIA at his disposal etc. are the ones I’m targeting. Great that you see the same.
Vladimir, I have very much enjoyed reading your excellent comments. Thanks for contributing to my article!
Thank you sir!
I try my best with the lights God has given me, and I try to learn from all. I appreciate it greatly.
I’ve got some really interesting information on the 1956 Hungarian colour revolution directed by Dulles and Otto. Perhaps the time has come to tell the truth about Hungarian Catholic fascism. If the Russians are procrastinating, no reason why we should.
The CIA and Pullach tested the Soviets and once they realised that the pushback was coming, they withdrew in a most cowardly fashion and left their fascist puppets inside Hungary to the mercies of the KGB under Andropov who were keen to learn as much as possible about the “European” networks responsible and their US paymasters. The result was 30+ years of peace and prosperity. There is a lesson there somewhere.
If I remember correctly, they were going to install Cardinal Mindszenty as the temporary ruler of a post-Communist Hungary, and maybe bring back the Habsburgs, not sure where I read that. But as you say, it didn’t work out.
Exactly. They infiltrated a number of fascist “nobles” who had faithfully served the Habsburgs and Hitler and used Mindszenty as the beacon for the rebellion. Once this failed, they deliberately kept Mindszenty (read Spellman, Stepinac and other scum) in internal exile (a la Asange) in order to weaken the socialist government. At least, Mindszenty was a somebody compared with Navalny, Tikhanovskaya and other nobodies they deploy these days.
Ah, I am glad I was not totally forgetful of what I had read, thanks.
You do have some confusion in mind, to the point of gross disinformation. Here some simple facts:
Catholic priests were assimilated to homosexuals in Nazi camps (black band). Church and Fascism co-operated up to a point, while Church and Nazis never did.
The Church excommunicated Judaeo-Bolsheviks and treated them like their worst enemy.
And finally, the international Jewry – Kabal – financial elites ultimately defeated Fascism in 1945 and sentenced it to damnatio memoriae. That was the end of Fascism and the beginning of toxic antifascism.
With that in mind, you should know, if you don’t already, that Orthodox Christianity is the truest form of Christianity. It just is. Don’t argue with me, just accept it.
That’s an interesting view but a difficult one for me. I have a hero in the faith a Dr. Walter Martin a preeminent expert on apologetics though passed away now. I actually consider him to be the Chrysostom of our day and age especially in view of how he singlehandedly destroyed David Hume view of Miracles. Blew David Hume out of the water. see here:
What I love especially about him however, is his great knowledge about the demonic and how he has been involved in hundreds of Exorcisms in his lifetime. To listen to his testimonies is like reading right out of the book of Acts! It is truly a wonder to behold and for me especially important given how I came across a young girl who was possessed. It wasn’t a pretty scene and it occurred in the my teens. Poor girl really. Dr. Walter Martin helped me to understand what happened to her. Further Dr. Martin has been used by God to heal the sick. A great testimony in above speech. A cripple walks !!! 27:20 mark above WOW!
It is this video that had a deep impact upon me however https://youtu.be/Vr0uPeoe4zg
I wish I had that knowledge when dealing with that young girl who wasn’t delivered from demon possession.
The outcome would have surely been different. Dr. Martin I truly mourn his passing. We lost a truly blessed man and he was Southern Baptist and no I’m not a Southern Baptist lol.
Wow, we need more like that man in the Church especially today. Such exorcists have my respect more than any others no matter the denomination. That is why when I pick up a newspaper and read in some back page a testimony from a Roman Catholic priest reporting to the Vatican he can’t believe how many woman are demon possessed? Working in the streets of Rome trying to save prostitutes’ he came across many who were in bondage to Satan. For me to hear such a testimony blew my mind taking me back to to my own experiences. Yep, I say too myself any who can do that deliver the demon possessed have my respect and full support. They are doing what the original apostles were doing.
Now I do not speak Russian or Greek but I imagine surely you have exorcists among your own ranks who can do the same. We will need more and more of them no matter what Christian Denomination they belong to as long as they adhere to the essentials of Christianity.
Are you Gerry Fox the author the author of climate change? If so I’m grateful to you for educating me how God expects us to think as well as act…. blessings.
@ GOD’s WORD
Lord i don’t want to rush on ahead
in my own strength
when you’re right here
I’m not in a hurry
when it comes to your spirit
when it comes to your presence
when it comes to your voice
i’m learning to listen
just to rest in your nearness
i’m starting to notice
you are speaking
Lord i want to love like you
i want to feel what you feel
i want to see what you see
open my eyes i want to see you more clearly
open my ears i want to hear you speak
tell me your thoughts whats on your mind
i’ll be your friend, i want to see through your eyes