by George Eliason for The Saker Blog
Look at the date in the above screen-shot. Read the summary again after you pick yourself up from off the floor.
Adam Schiff and the Democratic Party are basing an impeachment of the President of the United States on…wait for it….a tweet?
This particular tweet happened one day after the phone call between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskiy. So, quick question- how does a Ukrainian in Poland know about the one particular in the phone call any of the news outlets didn’t know until late September?
On August 25th Ukrainian channel 112UA reported “Donald Trump congratulated his Ukrainian counterpart on the victory of his political force in the parliamentary election. He also expressed hope that the corruption cases that worsened Ukraine-U.S. relations would be investigated and solved fast.”
On September 21, RFERL reported, “U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed he spoke with Ukraine’s president about former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden during a July call that is now at the center of a political scandal threatening to hamper relations between the two countries.”
The one difference between the tweet @DebkaG sent and the initial report of the story is the mention of Joe Biden. That wasn’t public until Donald Trump confirmed it.
How did DebkaG know “specifically Joe Biden” was under investigation?
According to the New York Times– The whistle-blower who revealed that President Trump sought foreign help for his re-election and that the White House sought to cover it up is a C.I.A. officer who was detailed to work at the White House at one point, according to three people familiar with his identity.
The man has since returned to the C.I.A., the people said. Little else is known about him. His complaint made public Thursday suggested he was an analyst by training and made clear he was steeped in details of American foreign policy toward Europe, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of Ukrainian politics and at least some knowledge of the law.
The C.I.A. officer did not work on the communications team that handles calls with foreign leaders, according to the people familiar with his identity. He learned about Mr. Trump’s conduct “in the course of official interagency business,” according to the complaint, which was dotted with footnotes about machinations in Kiev and reinforced with public comments by senior Ukrainian officials.
This explains why Adam Schiff wants no part in having the whistleblower testify. Imagine getting up in front of the US Congress as the whistleblower and saying- I saw it on Twitter. It must be true. That’s enough to impeach the President.
Imagine being Adam Schiff and trying to get re-elected or just living that one down.
In truth, I know next to nothing about DebkaG. The profile suggests a Ukrainian national in Poland because of the links to both the Ukrainian and Polish governments. The source @almostjingo sent it to me for another reason as well. They saw a tweet where DebkaG was asking former Ambassador Maria Yovanovitch what she knew about me.
This same Yovanovitch who is testifying at Donald Trump’s impeachment hearing was just exposed for stalking Americans and American journalists online. She’s concerned about her safety? What was she doing with the information about US citizens?
If DebkaG was tweeting about the phone call during the same timeframe, Yovanovitch is lying if she says she has no knowledge of the source and possibly the whistleblower.
Yovanovitch just testified she knows nothing about anything relevant concerning the Trump-Zelenskiy call. She was taken to task by John Solomon of the Hill for being one of the biggest activist policymaking diplomats in Ukraine.
William Taylor was just exposed for trying to restart the civil war in Ukraine after a pullback agreement was reached and signed by all parties. He is an extreme activist working against US foreign policy.
Pictured below Lugansk Peoples Republic Foreign Minister, Donetsk People’s Republic President Denis Pushilin, Ukraine’s former President Leonid Kuchma sign on troop withdrawal.
Then we have Alexander Vindman who doesn’t know enough about Ukraine to keep his job, but he poses as the US best expert. Vindman’s loyalties support Ukraine and he shows this by trying to change US policy.
I was concerned by the call,” Vindman said, according to his testimony obtained by the Associated Press. “I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine.”-Vindman
The bottom line is if the Democrats try to go forward with impeachment of any US president based on a whistleblower who got his information off…wait for it….Twitter, the only way they might see the inside of the Oval Office until the 2030s is to take the tour.
This action, if successful will destroy the US Presidency. No crime has been put on the table. It’s innuendo, politics, and we hate Donald Trump! If Congressman Schiff has anything substantial, the time passed for him to produce it. There is nothing.
This is the most disgustingly repugnant use of politics in US history. The idea the Democrats are willing to tear the fabric of the country as Ocasio-Cortez recently put it “for 2020,” violates the oath every Congressman and Congresswoman takes.
The reality is simple. Instead of working to fix the problems the US faces, Democrats, let Donald Trump to lead that charge. Instead of giving reasons to vote for their party, Democrats led a disjointed headhunting party against the Presidency with no rhyme or reason to it. The only explanation has been and is still Trump makes them feel bad.
Instead of fixing the deep state issues that will derail Bernie Sanders (again), Gabbard, or any other moderate, they’ve chosen shoddy narratives devoid of truth that will push the DNC further into militancy.
How does this set up the 2020 election for Donald Trump and any Democratic challenger?