Please support Andrei Martyanov on his website and Patreon page:
Posted by permission from Andrei Martyanov
Please support Andrei Martyanov on his website and Patreon page:
Posted by permission from Andrei Martyanov
A US-sponsored war in Ukraine will not divert attention away from America’s alien oligarchy but will only magnify the focus already on them.
Thank you for a very coherent assessment.
The US (and the UK also) is indeed desperate. Perhaps that is what makes the situation very dangerous especially for countries which are in Empire’s capture like Canada, Australia, South Korea, and the political EU.
One question though: I wonder if the Putin-Biden meeting on Tuesday will see a plea from the latter for a “little war”, to keep the action small and local but with a lot of noise and theatre?
I live in the United States. I have recently been shocked by what I hear in the news. It does indeed look like the US is planning for a war with Russia. I understand that “brinkmanship” – however dangerous – has long been a part of American politics. But what I am seeing now is more than “brinkmanship.” It appears as if they are getting ready for actual warfare.
I don’t however think it is to force Russia to cut off oil and gas to Europe. The US simply cannot supply more than a trickle of oil and gas to Europe. The “shale oil” revolution has collapsed. Most of the fields have shut down due to lack of profitability. And Wall Street venture capitalists are no longer willing to fund “shale oil” in the hope that someday it will become profitable.
Yes, if the price of energy increases the shale field could – probably after a six to nine month delay – start producing again but not in the amounts Europe needs or at the prices that Europe can afford. This would collapse the European economy and collapse the dollar along with it.
The real reason for starting a war with Russia?
The people in the State Department are out of touch with reality.
Yes the real reason and main goal is to collapse Germany mainly, and if Germany does collapse(even step by step), the all EU project will follow.
That is why there is something which is not logical as the EU is a US occupation project.Why would they suddenly destroy it?
Nothing is really coherent in the US power. According to T Meyssan theory, the Deep State is the ‘continuity of govt'(which took over on 9/11 during 12h), though probably the State Dept where all the neocons are in charge.
Biden and the Pentagon being on a different course, at least a little.
NS2 is a project for Germany and some smaller EU countries, Russia did not really proposed it first.
Ukraine is not reliable as a gaz transit entity it is not new, even before 2014, they interrupted the delivery to the EU several times. And the pipeline is very old in bad shape.
the shale gas was more about derivatives and speculation rather than profits.Several years ago there was a fly-by-night outfit, operating out of a P.O.box in Westchester, PA, looking to set up a ‘data center’ @ Rowan University in your state. It was to have a gas turbine electric generator to maintain an ‘uninterrupted’ power source. After Rowan told them to take a hike, they set their sites on the U.of Delaware, near where I live. It was obvious that these clowns were only interested in the Contract to use nat’l gas, with which they could in turn use for derivatives/speculation. After a well run citizens’ campaign, the UofD sent them packing as well. I think MorganStanley had an interest in these clowns. Investment bankers drilling for gas? Sure.
Negli US l’aborto è fino al nono mese e Biden, cattolico, lo appoggia, questo dimostra che è una nazione di morti viventi. Per loro la guerra è vita, più morti più vita. Spero che la Provvidenza Divina intervenga per salvarci da questo Male Assoluto (diabolico) diffuso in Occidente.
In the US abortion is up to the ninth month and Biden, a Catholic, supports it, which shows that it is a nation of the undead. For them, war is life, more deaths more life. I hope that Divine Providence will intervene to save us from this Absolute (diabolic) Evil widespread in the West.
However I suspect you make too much (or perhaps just the wrong thing of the pedophilia.
The who Gislaine Maxwell/Epstein thing was a honey trap i assume of Israeli manufacture possibly with full co-operation of MI6 and CIA (or other US intelligence agencies). Now the men entrapped by this lot were not pedophiles as such- simply sleezes looking for a good time with young women. I would guess that until the photos were taken the men thought the girls were over the age of consent. Especially designed to blackmail US politicians – probably would not work so well with Europeans who are more casual about sexual misdemeanors.
Now as to pedophilia (especially with young boys) that is an MI6 specialty and has been such for many, many years. I doubt pedophilia is any worse now than it has always been. It is just more public now. Now in the lead up to WWII and in the cold war, MI6 did not need to use young boys- simply adult homosexuals, to blackmail targets. Legalising homosexuality and making it acceptable – even fashionable, means that MI6 has to turn to children- pretty bloody sick, indeed despicable.
I agree with this analysis. While there are a lot of true pedophiles probably the majority of the people that Epstein and Maxwell entrapped were politicians and connected elites. Normal run of the mill dirt bags. Most men are not going to ask a girl they meet at a party to show her drivers license.
The issue is that the intelligence agency(s) that set Epstein up have all of that incriminating evidence on the US power structure. The list of people who hung out with Epstein is very lengthy. The people who are being blackmailed have committed many crimes for the blackmailers and want this to stay covered up. So we should expect very little to come out of the Maxwell trial.
Mr. Martanov brings up an important point. While cutting off Russian gas to Europe will be beneficial to the US is there something else brewing in the background that they are concerned about that is getting ready to surface?
There won’t be a war in Ukraine. Keeping people distracted with hysterical propaganda about Russia, China, Iran, Cuba ,Venezuela, ISIS, whatever– that’s standard operating procedure and has been for years. Keeps defense dollars flowing and distracts from the ongoing dismal economy. But US involvement in a serious war in Ukraine would be an economic/energy catastrophe for Europe and the US. US elites know this. So it’s not going to happen.
I’m inclined to agree with both your conclusion and the premises beneath it. The constant ginning up of hysteria in the United States is of a piece with what the North Korean state does constantly. Any differences between them are solely in the degree of explicitness in the stirring up of their populations’ negativity toward the hated “other.”
I agree with you.
I would add, however, that the massive fractures within the US due to inequality and other societal forces, and the Vaccine pushback, need a big distraction for the US population. This is true for the EU also. Unfortunately, anything can go wrong when that kind of provocations are implemented. The Russia hatred in Poland, eg., could result in rogue military action thinking they will be supported by the US. There is a need also, I think, to factor in China, which is also being provoked with Taiwan and South China Sea actions by the US.
A NATO/US miscalculation near Russia could easily lead to a response by Russia, taking more US attention in that area, and this might be the time China/Taiwan becomes more volatile. Surely the US does not want a “two front war.”
There will be no war (with the possible exception of some very controlled kabuki nonsense).
These ‘people’ are not going to exchange their fancy houses, cars, lifestyles and the endless gratification they derive from looking down their noses at the ‘little people’ to live in a hardened bunker deep under the ground.
Outside of an accident, it’s highly unlikely.
In the greater strategic context, there are also the US agitations against China and Iran. Obviously, two of the three are diversionary tactics, but could you address the possibility that the real goal is actually an attack on Iran?
From seasonal and political considerations, Ukraine attacking the Donbas in the winter doesn’t make as much sense as the US and Israel attacking Iran in the winter. This would also be the least consequential crime of the three.
Ps why are you not publishing at unz anymore?
Out of the three — China, Russia, and Iran — which one has actually been fighting the US Army in recent times? And not just fighting, but winning against the US Army?
If warfare comes down to comparing weapons and troop numbers, like the playing cards some of us played with when we were little, then the Russians and Chinese are definitely capable of putting up a fight against the US Army.
But if warfare is about the reality on the ground, Iran is the one that has not only fought the US and US proxies directly for decades, but has been winning that fight no matter how you look at it.
That said, I agree with the commentator who called all this “hysterical propaganda”.
The US has been threatening to attack Iran for over twenty years. There is only so long you can threaten to do something, without actually doing it, before your bluff gets called. In the past, every time the US would issue such threats, the Iranian stock market would crash, the currency would crash, and a new wave of people would immigrate away, etc. Today, even the US doesn’t believe its own empty threats of military action against Iran.
As for your assertion that it makes sense for the US and Israel to attack Iran now; the West has a very cold winter coming up, with energy prices at record highs. What happens to energy prices in the West if the Iranians and the Yemenis disrupt flows of oil and gas out of the region? (Bear in mind that Qatar is a massive producer of LNG, right in the middle of the Persian Gulf.) And how hard is it for Iran to disrupt that flow? I posit that targeting just one tanker will do the trick.
As far as the situation in the Middle East is concerned, the Iranians’ position is more solid and secure right now than it has ever been in modern times.
If the US is actually going to start a war somewhere, and that is a big if, the Middle East is the least likely out of the three, eg. together with Ukraine and Taiwan.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/05/opinion/energy-climate-iran-nuclear.html — “Several forces are coming together that could make Vladimir Putin the king of Europe, enable Iran to thumb its nose at America and build an atomic bomb, and disrupt European power markets..”
At this point in time, the positions of Russia and Iran are deceptively strong, unprecedented in recent times. As is the position of China. And there is your explanation for the US hysterical propaganda: a pathetic display of weakness and desperation.
The US is losing one of the most important military endeavors in its history right now, in the Middle East. This defeat marks the end of US hegemony. A war with Russia or China will effectively end the US right now.
“As for your assertion that it makes sense for the US and Israel to attack Iran now”
Ok, so I wasn’t actually asserting this, I’m just asking Andrei, who has definitely thought about it and dismissed it as unlikely, on what grounds he would have done so. I personally do think it’s really the most likely scenario, but it’s not what I asked him.
I appreciate the other points you’re making including that about hysteria, however, that’s not to discount the possibility of a conflagration occurring due to some miscalculation or of an accident.
The other point I wanted to add is that I’m sure even theses cretins in the Biden administration are not really planning an actual war with Iran, but more of a kind of incident which could be used as a pretext to bomb Iran continuously for the next decade.
The problem for the Biden planners is that the last victim of this type of death by a thousand cuts, Iraq, where US troops are still in control, won’t stand for it.
It’s possible all three are diversions and Venezuela is the next actual target. 2 million+ barrels of oil per day capacity, and located in the Western hemisphere. Keeping the other three busy with threats in their own backyards means that any help will be weak at best. Venezuela has been softened up considerably by sanctions.
Installing Juan Guaidó (currently acting president” of Venezuela) in power could be the plan.
The only thing needed is some kind of trigger such as the disappearance of some American citizens (maybe they turn up dead with signs of torture, or maybe they disappear and the government ‘refuses’ to hand them over). Or maybe some terrorist act, or a ‘chemical weapon’ attack on activists. Lots of possibilities. Further, dozens of countries recognize Juan Guaidó as the legitimate leader, so they can hardly object to the end result, even if they cluck a bit about the methods.
A small-ish war, securing (controlling) a bit more of the world’s oil supply, maintaining petrodollars, and the outcome would not be in question (at least in the short term). Just what the Dr. ordered?
Yesterday’s Miami Herald opinion piece: “Jeb Bush: Biden must act on ‘grave threat’ as Maduro’s Venezuela aligns with Iran and Hezbollah”
Yeah, agree Billb! Venezuela is definitely also on the radar and they may really attack on a number of fronts simultaneously.
I just thought that Iran was the first priority because of the relentless Israeli campaign against them going back to the 1990s, the recent billion dollar war chest the US just gave them, etc.. Also for the reason ‘Anonymous’ mentioned about losing credibility if you threaten without following through with is.
This and Ganz’s vacation plans spells war in early next year, if not for Christmas, when attention is elsewhere, while Russia and China are on their back heels, closer to home.
“..the recent billion dollar war chest the US just gave them, etc..”
Alright, first of all;
“Iran walked back all compromises made in previous talks on reviving the 2015 nuclear deal, pocketed compromises made by others and asked for more in its latest proposals, a senior US state department official told reporters on Saturday.”
Also, add to this the fact that Iran has forbidden the Americans from taking part in the negotiations. And the Americans have agreed to such a format.
Next point; just a short while ago, the IRGC demonstrated that they can capture any oil tanker in the Persian Gulf region, and there is nothing the US can do about it.
Third point; earlier this year, the IRGC Quds Force put on display the tip of the iceberg of Gaza’s power, as a loud and clear message to the Zionist regime: anything you do to Iran, Hamas and Islamic Jihad will do to you, including striking the Dimona site.
Now, back to the billion or so dollars that the Israelis have allocated for attacking Iran. This number is a joke. A billion and a half dollars for war against Iran?? When the Israelis first announced this, some of my acquaintances asked me if they are serious? I replied that “no, they are kidding.” I am going to stick with that.
Next point; the US has a good deal of its military forces and equipment within shooting distance of Iran. To defeat the US, Iran doesn’t need to strike at the mainland USA. All it needs to do is take out the countless US bases surrounding Iran, which the Americans somehow thought was a good idea to have, but as it turns out, is immense folly. Iran is not only easily capable of taking out all those bases, but this is actually part of their military strategy to counter the US threat in the region. Meanwhile, the USA will suffer catastrophic losses to its total military might, a good chunk of which is positioned in the Middle East.
Fifth point; the US is clearing its forces out from the region, exactly because they are all a liability if war breaks out with Iran. This is the rationale behind the withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the imminent and inevitable withdrawal from Iraq and Syria.
Sixth; if the US Army itself is not going to do the fighting, then US proxies must perforce do so. Saudi Arabia and UAE and those guys are bogged down in Yemen. Israel is surrounded by Gaza, Hezbollah, and the Syrians, and does not even have the balls to conduct a blind attack against fuel tankers heading for Lebanon, much less an open attack against Hezbollah’s godfather, Iran. That just leaves ISIS. ISIS in Syria and Iraq are finished, and all they can do now is blow up electric lines in the middle of the desert in the dead of night. And ISIS-K, which the US had great hopes for, is fizzling out in Afghanistan big time; clearly, the Taliban are a much more powerful force than ISIS-K, and they are 100% motivated to assume total control of Afghanistan, which they have done. And in any case, ISIS-K suicide bombers pose no existential threat to Iran.
Seven; Iran, through excellent strategic planning, has got everyone else in the region dealing with its enemies: the Houthis are dealing with KSA/UAE/UK/US, Hezbollah and Hamas are dealing with the Israelis, Hashd al-Shaabi and the Syrians are dealing with ISIS/US, the Taliban are dealing with ISIS-K, and Russia is dealing with Turkey’s adventurism in Syria. All these players listed here are doing what they are doing entirely because of their own self-interest, and Iran can rely on them to continue with what they are doing indefinitely.
Eight; Iranian arms and technology transfers to Venezuela are an open secret.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-iran-drone-idUSBRE85D14N20120614 — the IRGC has been teaching the Venezuelans how to make advanced drones and other tech, since at least 2012. Ever since that time, teams of IRGC and Hezbollah specialists have been on the ground in Venezuela supervising Venezuelan technicians in setting up a self-sufficient arms industry there to rival what the Houthis have got going on in Yemen. The US knows all this only too well, and that is why they have made no moves against Venezuela. And in any case, striking Venezuela, and capturing Venezuela are two completely different matters. The US is absolutely not capable of capturing and holding on to Venezuela at this point, where the majority there support their government and do not see the US as a friendly nation.
And all this brings us back to the first point: Iran is on the verge of becoming a threshold nuclear power. The US has begged Iran to return to the negotiating table for the last six months, while Iran seemingly dilly-dallied and built up its nuclear capabilities and stockpiled massive amounts of enriched uranium. All the while, Israel made open threats on a daily basis that it would strike Iran’s nuclear installations. Now, after months of dicking around the US and the Europeans, Iran has returned to the negotiations, but it has categorically forbidden the US to take part in the negotiations, and it has made its position clear, and I quote once more, “Iran walked back all compromises made in previous talks on reviving the 2015 nuclear deal, pocketed compromises made by others and asked for more in its latest proposals, a senior US state department official told reporters on Saturday.”
For those who don’t speak Iranian, allow me to translate. What they are saying is: You will give us everything we want, and we will give you nothing in return, and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it.
So, are the Iranians being over-confident? We will see soon enough. If Israel wants to attack Iran, now is the time. In just a few short months, by all accounts, Iran will become what is known as a threshold nuclear power, which in terms of the deterrence that nuclear weapons bring, is essentially tantamount to having nuclear weapons. If Israel does not strike Iran now, with its impressive 1.5 billion dollar budget, when will it strike? When the Iranians have got enough enriched uranium amassed and secured in twenty different locations deep under the mountains of Iran? And how many targets are the Israelis going to strike with their billion and a half dollars, anyway? Iran has numerous nuclear facilities spread out as far as 1000kms apart, and who knows how many military sites where nuclear research is being conducted, where the IAEA has never been granted access?
Now, I am no expert on the situation in the Ukraine or Taiwan, and while making predictions is risky business, I think I can categorically state that a US-Israeli attack on Iran is off the table, for multiple reasons.
1. Iran is capable of setting off a global energy crisis, with just a few little speed boats.
2. Iran is capable of completely annihilating Israel.
3. Iran is capable of reducing every US base within range of Iran to dust. (What did the US do when the IRGC attacked the al-Tanf base just a couple of months ago? What did the US do when the IRGC attacked the Ain Al Assad base last year?)
4. Iran is capable of doing such severe damage to oil and gas installations south of the Persian Gulf (eg. Saudi Aramco, et al) so as to basically bankrupt those states, while in the meantime, making any recovery of the aforementioned global energy crisis a very long and drawn out affair. (With the current state of the world economy, coupled with covid, if Iran decides to put forth all its might and destroy the oil and gas infrastructure of its southern neighbors, the world economy probably won’t recover for decades. People will starve and freeze and drop dead in the West as if the Plague had returned. There will be no toilet paper in Australia ever again.)
What does the US or Israel get out of a war with Iran? Israel gets destroyed, so it achieves nothing. The US loses numerous troops, billions and billions of dollars of military equipment and bases, etc, etc, and gains nothing except Iran being set back to the level of Afghanistan in terms of infrastructure, but the Resistance still won’t be eliminated. And who will then fight against the guerilla forces of the IRGC, Hezbollah, Houthis, etc, spread out all across the region, to prevent them from re-establishing themselves and securing basically half of the world’s energy reserves right under their feet? The frozen and starving people of the EU? Or the frozen and starving people of the US? Or the starving fat useless Saudis and Emiratis who havent stepped out from under their ACs since they were born, and whose lands produce no food? Or perhaps the Sudanese mercenaries fighting for the Saudis and Emiratis?
That makes a lot of sense.
I am not saying it is morally right. Just that it explains a lot.
The US is abandoning the oil in the middle east, it has little remaining oil and gas of its own – but pretends to be the world dominator. It doesn’t seem to make sense.
It could all be a diversion, drawing away attention from a quick move to dominate the Western Hemisphere’s oil reserves.
I actually have been surprised that the US hasn’t made a move against Venezuela already.
The scheduled video conference will be a sight to behold. In the red Corner, Mr P, who can actually talk for hours and hours, fielding questions, without notes, from left right and centre. In the blue Corner, we see Mr B, a mentally frail, elderly man, who cannot physically do any of those things. Mmmm…Gypsy King Tyson Fury meets Mr Bean ?
As anyone with eyes to see can see, there is a massive push now taking place to impose tyranny across the world under the guise of protecting the planet from a virus. The imposition of measures to force every single person to take the vaccine is frightening, to say the least. Threats of social isolation, fines and even imprisonment for simply refusing a vaccine is unheard of. They now, in Australia, even have concentration camps for the ones they want removed from society. That will spread to every nation. They will eventually have nearly all the people under control and willing to accept whatever governmental controls over them are demanded of them.
In a short while, I think we will wake up one morning to a newscast informing us that the NWO has been established and there is one, and only one, government of the world “legally” in control. At that point, Russia, China, Iran and North Korea will all be declared rogue governments and totally cut off from interaction with the rest of the world.
The NWO will then have the power to do whatever they want. They think they will be able to “starve” those countries politically, socially and financially. They will literally confine those countries to their own countries or else have their ships sunk in international waters, their planes shot down in international airspace, and their money and products will be totally forbidden outside their own countries. At that point, the NWO will expect those so-called rogue countries to capitulate. I think they will.
You are bang on target, expect some flak
The trouble with that vision is that the NWO will absolutely need outputs from those rogue countries, whereas the rogue countries will need nothing from the NWO.
The NWO will consider that a small loss on the near side will be more than compensated for by a huge gain on the far side.
Thanks for posting as I personally was confounded as to what the US goals for this are. It is very clear this is a massive PSYOPS campaign and I thought the target was the US population but perhaps it is also the citizens of the EU as well. One thing not commented much on is that there are in fact 4 superpowers. The EU is functionally a single nation (albeit with some resistance among its members). The EU has an economy nearly equal to the US and China so is in fact a competitor. What makes it worse is that the members of the EU Parliament are on the payroll of the US and many also receive payments from Soros as well. This means they have been bribed to the point of ignoring the obvious interests of their own countries and are enslaved to US interests (similar to the UK). With that as an additional factor then the demise of the EU might be the real goal here and cutting them off from cheap energy coming from Russia is the knockout punch.
Russia must now dance a delicate dance to thwart any Ukrainian offensive efforts and keep this at the level of a low-intensity conflict (LIC). The US has sucked terribly throughout history as being unable to effectively wage war at the LIC level. Teaching the Ukrainian Army to operate with American doctrines guarantees their failure. The best case is for Russia to stop this from happening in the first place. I can think of several things they can do to thwart this most of which would be targeted assassinations. But despite American rhetoric, Russia simply doesn’t act this way. The US does though and they always see others through the lens of their own actions. They simply can’t understand anything else. This is a plus for the Russians.
The second option is to buy time as the US is very likely to collapse within the next year or so especially if the massive $5.5 trillion spending Bill gets passed which will be the final nail in the coffin for the US. The best case for the defense of LDPR would be to envelop and capture the bulk of the Ukrainian Army. After sitting for 9 months in trenches with bad food, little sleep, and poor living conditions the morale of the Ukrainian Army is near rock bottom. This makes them an excellent target for a Russian PSYOP operation and perhaps they will revolt as happened with the Russian forces at the end of World War I and either walk away from their posts or surrender to the LDPR. The longer Russia can keep this from happening the better are the prospects for a revolt among the Ukrainian Army.
The worst thing they could do is a massive counter-attack and try and take the whole country. I do not think this will happen. Worst case Russia will forcibly separate the LDPR from Ukraine and form a new nation under their protection similar to Abkhazia. They would have to destroy the majority of the Ukrainian offensive forces should they attack the LDPR lines. I would assume plans are in the works for a fighting retreat and massive barrage with an envelopment (cauldron) of the Ukrainian forces. This can be done without Russian forces even entering Ukraine at all assuming the LDP forces are intact and the losses among the Ukrainian Army are devestating. This happened earlier in 2014 so not all that unrealistic, especially under US leadership. Better still it would be legal under the UNSC directive as Russia has the responsibility for the defense and conduct of the LDPR forces under international law just as France and Germany bear responsibility for Ukrainian actions.
After sitting for 9 months in trenches with bad food, little sleep, and poor living conditions the morale of the Ukrainian Army is near rock bottom. This makes them an excellent target for a Russian PSYOP operation and perhaps they will revolt as happened with the Russian forces at the end of World War I and either walk away from their posts or surrender to the LDPR.
Wouldn’t a good way to win over the ranks of the Ukrainian army to peace be to declare a temporary Xmas truce? For the LDPR authorities to air-drop Xmas food parcels to them in their trenches? Perhaps the parcels could contain Xmas cards explaining the nature of the conflict, appealing for peace and calling upon the troops to abandon the war and go home to their families? Or give the troops the opportunity to seek refuge in the LDPR during the truce? The hard core Nazi units will not be won over to peace in this way, of course, but the average Ukrainian workers and peasants might be.
What will Russia do if the Ukranonazis slaughter Donbass Russians like last time? What if there are photos of dead school children….fetuses blown out from dead young mothers?…..
They will do as before. Train and equip LDPR forces, provide intelligence, encourage volunteers to help, and if necessary, step in and take the area away from Ukraine permanently. They certainly will use direct support fire from outside Ukraine. The problem is Putin never threatens he makes promises. So his declaration that an attack on the Donbass would mean the end of Ukraine as a nation must have some meat to it. However, Putin is the master of asymmetric warfare so it could come from weird angles.
…….Putin is the master of asymmetric warfare ….
What does asymmetric war mean to you? Maskirovka? I lived through the war, but I dont get it. Probably I am to stup…id, so can you explain that to me. Thank you
Please watch this and then ask yourself how will Putin or anybody for that matter be able to deal with a guy that has lost his marbles? but maybe that’s the reason they put him in power?
He is representative of the establishment politicians in the US. The pedophile stuff is yet another symptom of this problem. I think Lavrov and Putin have FINALLY begun to understand that they are dealing with madmen. Reasoning and rationale are not operational concepts with US leadership who lie so much they believe their own lies.
But what these politicians do understand is force and potential loss of power. People who suffer from narcissistic personality disorder and are also psychopaths appear to be the kind of leadership chosen in the US today. Biden is obviously one of these as is Hillary Clinton. I fully understand this having had a mother with this disorder and the tales she spun just grew and grew over the years and she was convinced they were real. No amount of reasoning would shake her even when it was blatantly obvious.
The other festering sore is the amazingly large number of Banderists that have infiltrated US politics and there are a lot of them now. This problem is also happening in Canada as well. One could blame Stalin for not killing every surviving member of the Ukrainian nazi sympathizers at the end of the war. In effect he had all Russian POWs interfered and many died after the war ended so why didn’t he just end this problem once and for all at the time? I suppose we will never know the answer to this.
The other thing that boggles my mind is that Zionistic Jews like Nuland and Blinken support actual bonafide Nazis. It really blows my mind. Zelinski himself is Jewish and the Right Sector was funded by Kolomoiski (Zelinski’s benefactor) yet another Zionist jew who also absconded with most of the money from the IMF. So this is yet another paradox of the Ukraine where jews are actively and willingly supporting Nazis. I have difficulty wrapping my head around it. You can add in the problems of the pieces of neighboring nations absorbed into Ukraine such as a piece of Poland and a fairly large part of Hungary. The people living in these regions have adamantly refused to assimilate but are equally affected by the laws passed in Kiev about making it illegal to speak any other language than Ukrainian and to teach other languages in school. It is for this reaon alone that Ukraine will never be admitted into NATO or the EU. Hungary has warned tham and been refused so the die is cast. I live in Hungary and the Hungarian nature is to be very stubborn and once they have made their minds up it cannot be changed. So any fantasy of Ukraine becoming a member of either NATO or the EU will be blocked by Hungary and/or Poland. Hungary is currently experiencing a US-sponsored color revolution to get rid of Victor Orban who is a thorn in the side of both the US and the EU. The heat is definitely on here from the US. So the US is ratcheting up the pressure throughout Europe to eliminate all “enemies” of the US. Strangely Orban and Trump were very good friends and we enjoyed a brief period of no US interferance. That has definitely changed.
…..The other thing that boggles my mind is that Zionistic Jews like Nuland and Blinken support actual bonafide Nazis…….
How about catholic Bavarians? Is that asymmetric warfare? So far they ve been russian “partners”:)). Like they were socialists before world war (worker will not go against the worker :)).
The president of the European People’s Party, the leading faction of the European Parliament, and the co-chairman of the Bavarian Christian Social Union, Manfred Weber, called on the future German government to close the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project if Russia “attacks” Ukraine.
“So this is yet another paradox of the Ukraine where jews are actively and willingly supporting Nazis.”
Im not sure this is such a conundrum, oM, they needed them in the Maidan and they’ll need them for Russian cannon fodder, should the opportunity present itself.
Obviously, regarding these Ukronazis, the rank and file are clueless while the management is using them to serve the regime’s goals.
Not so surprising, in Syria Israel provides weapons, intel, money and receives jihadists from ISIS/Al Nusra WIA in Tel Aviv.
After all, wasn’t it in Hungary a couple of years ago that the head of the Nazi party had to resign when it came out that he was Jewish?
“The other festering sore is the amazingly large number of Banderists that have infiltrated US politics and there are a lot of them now. This problem is also happening in Canada as well. One could blame Stalin for not killing every surviving member of the Ukrainian nazi sympathizers at the end of the war. In effect he had all Russian POWs interfered and many died after the war ended so why didn’t he just end this problem once and for all at the time? I suppose we will never know the answer to this.”
US and Canada have nothing to complain about. They let these Nazi in back in 1940’s. And also this is what happens when you impose tyranny on other. Eventually you end up tyranny being imposed on your self!
thank you, OM, very nice to hear your voice once again, & to receive your overview. much appreciated.
In re the links ‘tween zionists and nazis inter alia see >https://archive.org/details/AlbertEinsteinLetterToTheNewYorkTimes.December41948
Just as soon as I can make a list of how the two are different I’ll post it. I’ve been working on this list for years, and it’s very difficult, and so far, very short.
Didn’t bother to check the link. Is someone there seriously asking if a US President is a pathological liar?
LOL Every single US President as far back as I can remember in my 72 years has been a pathological liar! John F. Kennedy used to pull fake figures out of his butt in his press conferences, for Christ’s sakes!
Read my lips: You don’t get to be President without being a pathological liar. The only President in US history who *allegedly* wasn’t a liar was George Washington – and I don’t believe that story for an instant.
That anyone seriously asks the question shows how ignorant the US electorate is about their so-called “leaders.”
OK. I do not think a war scenario in Central/Eastern Europe will occur as posited in this video. At the end of the day, people make a decision based on calculations of benefit and harm and I cannot see any real benefit to the west of some casus belli via Ukraine to draw Russia into pointless war adventure. First of all, Russia will cost-efficiently refuse such a gambit and continue to let General Winter dispel the confusion and clarify the true state of affairs in Europe for the World. By general Winter, I of course mean Time and I think it is clear Time is on Russia’s side. There is also another reason why a war will not take place and that is because people report a stupid malevolent agenda and cold-heartedness of a system directed at its own people. There maybe something big coming but it wont be to lucky Ukraine. Lastly, aside from the Russia move and the object of attention of the system, there is a third factor – a Zeitgeist variable – that has been slowly pulling Europe, and other countries attention, towards their own internal symbols.
What you thing about this analysis
Russia should not worry and do nothing since the empire can collapse at any time. If they hold that belief everything will be alright
Unraveling of the American empire: A series of military debacles point toward a tragic end
The U.S. retreat from Afghanistan is only the latest in a long list of defeats. From here, the endgame gets ugly