A leak of private documents of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations has been released, courtesy of DC Leaks.
George Soros is known to be involved in pretty much any revolution or coup around the world as well as heavily influencing politics. But these leaks provide direct evidence and show how deep and serious his involvement is. Here’s a quick analysis of what one can find.
First, there’s a lot of cash involved. The guy is literally pouring money into all these NGOs by either financing them directly or sponsoring their projects (which always have clearly defined goals).
The papers don’t mention final intentions directly but always use “promoting” with the following keywords:
* human rights
* LGBT rights
* women’s rights
* alternative news (which is really funny as they also boast their relations with mainstream media like The Guardian, Liberation, Huffington Post, etc…)
* gender equality
They’ll also claim to fight corruption and fascism. Of course, corruption and fascism always seems to happen within systems opposed to “EU values” (Orban’s Hungary, Putin’s Russia, …) and not where they really happen (ie. Ukraine, although they do recognize Ukraine is in a messy state).
Here are some of the techniques they use:
* influence new political parties (eg. Five star movement in Italy, Podemos in Spain, Syriza in Greece, …)
* organise conferences in universities
* organise exchange visits with activist groups between countries (eg. Ukrainian activists meeting Spanish protesters)
* get the support of mainstream journalists
* setup coalitions and make it appear it’s the only truthful news source (eg. Friends of Maidan)
* influencing EU MEPs
* kicking out Russian media broadcasts
* getting young people to vote in a certain way
* producing videos, documents, social media groups, …
* organizing protests
* praising migrations, LGBT, equality (of genders, never of salaries and social status)
* attack populist/nationalist movements
They try to brainwash these group of people:
* left wing groups
* young people
* the right (refered to as ultranationalists and anti-semitic)
* Russia (Putin’s Russia, Russian propaganda, anything from Moscow is dismissed)
* Hungary (Victor Orban)
* anything that tries to resist the EU
They fear crackdowns on NGOs, which is something Russia initiated some years ago as they recognized the dangers these organisations bring ( http://soros.dcleaks.com/download/?f=/European%20Election/EUDO%20conference%20%20%202013%20Elections%20in%20Europe%20in%20times%20of%20crisis/economic%20voting%20in%20latvia%20and%20lithuania%20in%202010%202012%20ibenskas.pdf&t=europe ).
List of organisations with Open Society sponsored projects for the year 2014:
* 444 – Hungarian Jeti Co.
* Associazione 21 luglio
* Associazione Upre Roma
* Association for the Defense of Human Rights in Romania
* Association l’Universite du Citoyen
* Athena Institute
* Athens Pride
* Bite the Ballot
* Bondy Blog
* Budapesti Szocialis Forraskozpont
* Centre for Peace Studies
* Cité en Mouvement
* Communication Center X
* Daniel Sachs Foundation
* EUobserver ASBL
* European Alternatives
* European Citizens Abroad
* European Cultural Foundation
* European Network Against Racism
* European Women’s Lobby
* European Digital Rights
* European Youth Forum
* Finance Watch AISBL
* Fiscal Responsibility Institute Budapest
* Foundation Expo
* Foundation for an Open Society
* Foundazione Romani Italia
* Heinrich Böll Foundation Greece
* Hellenic League for Human Rights
* Hungarian LGBT Alliance
* Hungarian Helsinki Committee
* HOPE not hate Educational Ltd
* IG Kultur Osterreich
* International Alert
* Ligue des droits de l’Homme
* Lithuanian Youth Council
* Media Diversity Institute
* Migration Policy Group
* Migrant’s Rights Network
* Migrant Voice
* Milestone Consulting Kft
* OSF Prague
* National Youth Council of Slovenia
* New Europeans
* Northern Ireland Women’s European Platform
* Polish City Club
* Political Capital Institute
* Progressives Zentrum
* Prospect Mühely Alapitvány
* Public Diplomacy Council of Catalonia
* SOLIS Conseil
* Stefan Batory Foundation
* Stichting Eurofact
* SOS Racisme Catalunya
* Transparency International Latvia
* Transparency International – Liaison Office to the European Union
* Transparency International Hungary
* UNITED for Intercultural Action
* Votewatch CIC
* Young European Federalists
As you can see, this is a long list. Some NGOs are country specific and some are spread between many countries of the European Union. Here’s the fully detailed list: http://linkis.com/sli.mg/a/Dvev5
The full documents are searchable on DC Leaks (http://soros.dcleaks.com/). Here are some interesting ones I found:
How to promote post-Maidan:
Soros idea on Ukraine, make it an attractive investment, in the expense of EU countries:
Example of a consultancy contract. Notice how the goals are clearly stated beforehand any research is done: http://soros.dcleaks.com/download/?f=/Ukraine%20and%20Europe/italy/final%20draft%20contract.docx&t=europe
Feel free to put links to interesting articles in the comments.
Thanks Dave! I wonder how much Soros delegates as he must be nearing his demise. Then too, how much of his organization’s run by CIA.
The Soros meteoric financial rise from nothing to an extremely rich billionaire pouring his profits into CIA operations? – or Soros is and was a CIA operation from the start specifically to raise money to fund CIA operations?
This is asking the right question!
I just read today somewhere that his son is taking over. What a bummer. Just when you think his evil might end with him.
I looked for it. Soros has four sons, wouldn’t you know. Alexander is making the rounds currently:
Alex Soros comes out of the shadows. Son of George Soros is busy putting politicians in his pocket
Basically, when Georg Soros dies, his son is going to continue the good work. The attacks against European countries will continue. An example:
The Austrian Prime minister Christian Kern says Turkey cannot join the EU. By coincidence, Alexander Soros says on his twitter he has had a “very productive”, “very interesting” meeting with Chancellor Kern some weeks before. In case you forgot: George Soros arranged the deal between Europe and Turkey on the migration crisis.
I see no difference between the Soviet ambassador telling the prime minister of an East-European country what to do in the 1980-ies, and Soros telling the Austrian Chancellor what to do. US occupation is a bit more subtle than Soviet occupation, but not much.
“US occupation is a bit more subtle than Soviet occupation, but not much.”
You tell the world’s downtrodden and oppressed that. Also, priest-ridden Poland is an interesting case in point. Under Soviet rule, there was no such things as torture dungeons in Poland. “Liberated” Poland is a different matter, reverting to the happy times under previous Western occupation, courtesy of Nazi Germany. Death camps seem to be an inseparable part of those good ol’ “European values”. Ukraine under Soviet as opposed to Western rule should also make the point clear.
On this basis, how is Soviet occupation less “subtle” ?
Here is how to know if a country (or party,group,etc) is fighting against Soros and his ilk. If they ban NGO’s,or at least NGO’s receiving outside funds. Then the country is fighting back. If a political party or group refuses any connection (at all) with those NGO’s. Then they are fighting back. If a country or party or group “doesn’t” then they are in league with them. And there is no way to trust that country,party,or group. Its really quite simple in fact.
Looks like McCain’s NGO is now being kicked out of Russia:
George Soros is a Luciferian Satanist Oligarch Minion
As far as I know he also hates Israel because it’s a right-wing country.
I don’t take “right wing/ left wing” seriously, but I think he’s one of these people that do.
I am of the left, the old hard orthodox left, the one that puts ordinary people first. I know many people despise that, but this is a new period of history, there is a left and right within the corporatist party (including Soros and Hillary). There is a left and right in the anti-corporatist party.
Soros has worked the watered down liberal left they are the footsoldiers of his campaigns. It needs to be cracked not strengthened.
Decades ago liberals were important, they had an independent mind and were often anchored to a independent class of business and professionals. They reduce questions to right and wrong, based on principles of fairness and right action. The economic independence that supported earnest and clear thinking liberalism has disappeared to be replaced by corporatist interests that feign support for doing right — that is the problem here, Dave’s article screams this.
If the attack is levelled at progressives and liberals, as is usually the case the corporatist party is strengthened, they know this, what they want is a divide and it is why the have two wings when in fact they have no investment in any principle except self-serving.
My appeal here is to the anti-corporatist right, don’t attack the idea of progressives and liberals, praise whatever you can that they did in the past, and then attack them for self-betrayal, hypocrisy etc. It is a lead left punch followed by a right upper cut. I have been doing the same in an opposite way for decades and it usually works, I praise old conservatives, and old right wingers for their response to things going wrong and then lay into the stupidity for making things wrong now.
There are only two parties and they both have a right wing and left wing, forget that and you will play Soros’ game The enemy is corporatist the state and special interests working together as one. Our left leads with a right and hits with a left, or right leads with the left and hits with the right. There left sticks to abstract principles and repeats mantras, their right sticks with abstract hates and repeats mantras. We do not have to like each other to work together.
I’m an old Cold War anti-communist warrior that in the early 1990’s started to see that the US was aiding and abetting jihadis, fascists, and nazis in the Balkans. I broke with the National Review enabled neocon control of the Republicans and for the next decade gravitated to moving among the paleoconservatives around the Thomas Fleming Chronicles magazine. At the last Chronicles annual meeting I attended I met progressives that Fleming invited, including the editors of Counterpunch and other progressive journalists, and I also met the last of the living pre-WW2 paleoconservatives, now mostly dead. From talking to progressives I started to realize that we agreed more than disagreed and that we should continue to talk and should work together. I asked the journalist Norman Solomon why we think we are opponents and he said that is the major theme of the mass media, to keep us apart.
For me now there are just three groups: fascists and nazis, neolibs and neocons, and the rest of humanity. I find some of that rest of humanity in the US but not much. Mostly I find it outside of the US and its Anglosphere and EU vassals.
I notice that in Germany both the right-wing “AfD” and the left-wing “Die Linke” are against the TTIP Treaty. I wish both parties would cooperate at least in this matter, and stop TTIP.
The elite button pushers get us to fight with each other so we will not pay attention to what they are doing.
Just the same as in the US, really. Berners should either flock to Trump or all fall in with Jill Stein at once to give her a large voting bloc than Clinton. Instead half waffle about “supporting a racist” and the other are self-defeatist telling themselves 3rd party won’t work
Both are against war.
Both are against corporate cronyism
Both are against TPP
Both are against “Global intervention”
If not for the MSM, the ticket would be Trump/Sanders with Jill tagging along for an EPA or Secretarial position. Probably Agriculture to fix the subsidy mess.
The True Single Party, the War Party, has all been thrust onto one side by Trump, and this SHOULD be the opportune time to do them in, but still the Berners can’t decide where to go.
Probably the first time in US history “undecided” outnumbers all
A report from Amnesty is circulating today: “Harrowing accounts of torture, inhuman conditions and mass deaths in Syria’s prisons”
It says: “….The report highlights new statistics from the Human Rights Data Analysis Group (HRDAG), an organization that uses scientific approaches to analyse human rights violations, which indicate that 17,723 people died in custody across Syria between March 2011 when the crisis began and December 2015. This is equivalent to an average of more than 300 deaths each month….”
I googled this Group HRDAG, and no surprise there, it is funded mainly by Open Society Foundation (Soros)
“...since HRDAG’s 2013 launch, the Group has been primarily funded through the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Open Society Foundations (OSF), and Humanity United…”
Shame on Amnesty — again
Stalin, had terminated with extreme prejudice (an ice pick) the psychopathic mass murderer of Christian..L Bronstein, a.k.a. Trotsky ?? where is Stalin today to exterminate Trotsky Mark II ??
I thought Soros was an agent of Rothchilds. There is nothing suspicious about his billions- he is a famous speculator. When he has something certain, he bets big. He broke the Bank of England causing Black Monday by betting against the pound.
In the US “world” people do not start with nothing and become that big just on speculation, hard work and diligence. Intelligence is needed. Much of his money goes to CIA regime change operations, so it is a very good chance that the required intelligence came from the CIA who specialise in that line of work.
Soros was an agent of ‘Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder’ New York-based investment bank. The core constituent was a merger between the banking firm of S. Bleichröder founded by Samuel Bleichröder in 1803 in Berlin, acting as a branch office in Berlin of the Rothschilds’ bank and the banking firm of Gebr. Arnhold (Arnhold Brothers) founded in Dresden in 1864 which acquired S. Bleichroeder in 1931. In 1937 the firm’s activities were moved to New York City and conducted business under the name of Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder, Inc.
The Bleichroeder-Mendelsshon group dominated the financial sector of the Bismarkian Germany, in competition with the Rothschild dominated group. The Kuhn, Loeb&Co Bank of New York which financed Trotsky and Lenin (under the direction of Jacob Schiff and Felix Warburg), was an offshoot of the Bleichroeder. In 1977, facing a capital crisis, the firm succumbed and merged with Lehman Brothers, to form Lehman Brothers, Kuhn, Loeb Inc. which in turn collapsed in 2008.
From 1963 to 1973, Soros was vice president at Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder. He spent the years from 1963 to 1966 with his main focus on the revision of his philosophy dissertation. In 1966 he started a fund with $100,000 of the firm’s money to “experiment with his trading strategies”.
So, we see that it was the same banking cabal which financed the Cominternist Revolution and the new ‘soft approach’ of Soros. Anyhow, he was beholden to what is now called ‘Cultural Marxism’, actually the pure Marxism, anti-Russian (and anti-Christian) from start to the (open) end. The concepts of ‘open society’, ‘open morality’, ‘open soul’ were first suggested by the ‘French’ philosopher Henry Bergson (incidentally descendant of the Bereksohn “famous Jewish entrepreneurial family of Polish descent. Henri Bergson’s great-great-grandfather, Szmul Jakubowicz Sonnenberg, called Zbytkower, was a prominent banker and a protégé of Stanisław August Poniatowski”).
Forgot to sign on August 20, 2016 · at 1:03 am UTC
It is telling that out-right foreign influence in US politics and therefore way of life is now openly acknowledged.
This would indicate that our national security state is abetting it, or is fractured and in disagreement. Hence the crescendo of data leaks we’ve witnessed.
George Soros’ close connections to the State Department, Hillary, Obama, and even the technology and media companies, indicates he is likely just an arm in multi-body group.
Perhaps his plan of world integration is OUR government’s tentative plan, the only way the US can reliably contain its financial situation outside of direct war, falling upwards into a unified world order where its financial obligations can be ignored and a new global currency issued. Collapsing slowly and picking the pieces back up into a collective order would create a much large Union than the Soviets ever managed, leaving the nationalistic Chinese and Russians on the outskirts.
Parts of the security establishment would find this appealing, likely those connected to trans-national capital and large corporations, as they would likely sit at the top of this world order.
This makes the rise of Trump’s nationalistic, financially conservative politics all the more appealing and certainly the best medicine.
The enormous number of apparently independent organizations which form the labyrinthine network of foundations, partners, and projects in more than 100 countries which is the Soros’ ‘Open Society Foundation’, is meant to bamboozle any curious inquirer into the real aims of it. We can understand that this account missed some important ‘offshoots’, like the ones in Romania. It is sadly true that Romania (and the Romanian nation) are a sort of ‘black hole’ in the political imaginary of ‘Europe’ (especially of ‘Anglo’ persuasion) and anything that might happen there is inconsequential. Romania is, in the words of the French historian Lucien Romier ‘Le Carrefour des empires morts. Du Danube au Dniester’ (a book, written in 1931, that you will have a hard time to find, Romier being a “Petain Minister’). It would require a too long study into the Romanian history (which would go far beyond the ‘Dracula/Transylvania’ meme) and of the Balkans, for that matter, to document the efforts of the ‘West’ to prevent these lands fall ‘into the Bear’s embrace’ and keep them into the fold of ‘Europe’ and NATO (it’s a long history, with many meanders).
So, a bit of update:
“New Europe College (NEC) is an independent Romanian institute for advanced study in the humanities and social sciences founded in 1994 by Professor Andrei Pleșu (philosopher, art historian, writer, Romanian Minister of Culture, 1990–1991, Romanian Minister of Foreign Affairs, 1997-1999) within the framework of the New Europe Foundation, established in 1994 as a private foundation subject to Romanian law.
Its impetus was the New Europe Prize for Higher Education and Research, awarded in 1993 to Professor Pleșu by a group of six institutes for advanced study (the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, the National Humanities Center, Research Triangle Park, the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in Humanities and Social Sciences, Wassenaar, the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences, Uppsala, and the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin).
Since 1994, the NEC community of fellows and alumni has enlarged to over 500 members. In 1998 New Europe College was awarded the prestigious Hannah Arendt Prize for its achievements in setting new standards in research and higher education. New Europe College is officially recognized by the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research as an institutional structure for postgraduate studies in the humanities and social sciences, at the level of advanced studies.
Focused primarily on individual research at an advanced level, NEC offers to young Romanian scholars and academics in the fields of humanities and social sciences, and to the foreign scholars invited as fellows appropriate working conditions, and provides an institutional framework with strong international links, acting as a stimulating environment for interdisciplinary dialogue and critical debates. The academic programs NEC coordinates, and the events it organizes aim at strengthening research in the humanities and social sciences and at promoting contacts between Romanian scholars and their peers worldwide.
Institute for Advanced Study”.
A primary objective is the promotion of an utterly falsified history of Romania (a great number of scholarships are offered for studies at the Soros creation, the ‘Central European University’ in Budapest) and the subversion of the Orthodox Church and replacing her teaching by a uniato-ecumenistic (strongly Judaized) outlook as well as with a ‘science of religions’.
People promoted by NEC are now prominent in Academia, Church, politics and of course, influential opinion makers (invariably anti-Russian). As an aside, it is worth remembering that the founder of NEC was the Minister of Foreign Affairs in the Government which opened the Romanian air space for the assault against Yugoslavia.
Thank you for your extensive account showing the sub-reptilian work of capital to keep the masses in fetters. It is in fact amazing the extent and depth to which they go to construct a reality shaped by a narrative of whorish intellectuals, pushers of levers of power and opinion-makers.
The more I find out the immensity of hurdles facing the common man to overcome the power of capital, the more I understand that liberation must come from the barrel of a gun and why the Communards and Bolsheviks were right.
WizOz, That was delicious, well crafted, well documented, well written update. Thank you. I had no idea…
Your comment is very good and above all, true. Is sad to see, how the treason on high level is continuing in Romania, but in the same path are the rest of the EU countries, as you well noted, in the specific form for each country. The scope and the ultimate target is to achieve the total servitude toward the Empire. The biggest win for the Empire in the last decades was to get two relative major orthodox countries like Romania and Serbia-Montenegro (plus Bulgaria) into their barracks, and turning them against the bigger orthodox brother, Russia at the very moment when Russia has rediscovered her orthodox main and deep roots. By obtaining this split between the brothers in faith, has succeeded to split the spirituality of those countries, related to Russia. By negating the truth in history and by falsifying it, they want to loose the identity of the people. Yes, brainwash and soul-wash.
What profoundly saddens me is to see many friends brainwashed to such an extent that it became impossible to have a rational discussion on these subjects. They react with aggressive fury, especially if you remind them that the most vocal ‘anti-communists’ have all been profiteers of the hated regime and they haven’t suffered any persecution. But you are in a better position to know that “la vremuri noi tot noi” (‘copiii stăpînilor noștri vor fi stăpînii copiilor noștri’).
I do not agree with the author when he identifies the “right-wing” as “sovereignist” and “left-wing” as pro-Soros. It is true that there is a sort of Left-wing that supports Soros (And I wrote about it), but not all the left-wing is that way: Venezuela, Belarus and Cuba govts (left-sided) are targeted by Soros, for example. The first Soros sponsored movements were anti-Communist movements in Central Europe in the late 80es, and the first “colour revolution” was the one in Serbia in 2000, against a “leftist” government (Slobodan Milosevic).
I am left-wing, and I have been blacklisted (in the Spanish list).
“I am left-wing, and I have been blacklisted (in the Spanish list).”
Siento oirlo, camarada.
Te escribí aquí una respuesta, hace un par de días, donde también expresaba mi desacuerdo con el tono del artículo en el mismo sentido que tú lo haces, pero fue moderado y no ha aparecido.
No sé por qué.
Según veo en la lista de pro-rusos lo que tienen son cuentas de Twitter. Por eso yo no tengo ni Facebook ni Twitter, obviamente pierdes una manera más de difundir información y opinión sobre las cosas que realmente pasan en el mundo, pero estos medios están a su servicio y yo no me pienso exponer de esta manera.
Yo no he leído todo el leak, pero sabes si también hay cuentas de Twitter de gente pro-rusa en los EEUU? Esto me interesa bastante para resolver definitivamente unas dudas que tengo.
Revisa tu correo, te dejé una respuesta.
The Soros leaks lead to questions in the Dutch Parliament.
Another thing I want to comment here:
There have been five “mappings” on “Ukrainian conflict”: in Spain, France, Italy, Greece and Germany have been mnade by OSIFE (Open Society Europe).
In Spain, this studio has been “delegated” on CIDOB-Centre forn International Information and Documentation Barcelona (which had been also funded by Open Society).
But CIDOB is not only a Soros partnet, but its is in the top of “Soros International”. CIDOB is located in the Elisabets street of Barcelona (http://www.cidob.org/ look at the bottom of the page) where also OPen Society Europe is (https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/about/offices-foundations/open-society-initiative-europe look at the bottom right of the page).
This street coincidence is not casual. The actual director of Open Society Europe is Jordi Vaquer (https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/about/staff/programs/55144?sort_by=field_profile_sort_name_value&sort_order=ASC&page=1 look ant the bottom left of the page), which was director of CIDOB: http://www.cidob.org/prensa/entrevista_jordi_vaquer_el_periodico
The president of honour of ICDOB is the killer and war criminal Javier Solana: http://www.cidob.org/cidob/patronato
Thanks to remind of Javier Solana, the butcher of Yugoslavia (one of them)
Thank you, Dave.
I wish you could repeat this exercise for South Africa, or for Southern African, or for Africa as a whole.
Look at his face
Look at his look
His eyes, a Buck
And he is proud
Cause he found
Led by his will
The way to Devil
With regard to the Left wing of Western imperialism — Syriza, Podemos, Lutte Ouvrière etc. — I think the description of Soros as an “influence” upon new political parties is taking understatement to the point of caricature. Literally all these outfits are his brainchildren. Strictly speaking, Syriza’s instant capitulation after winning the Greek referendum in July last year for example wasn’t any real capitulation. Syriza sold the romantic message of Soros very successfully indeed: “EU without austerity”. What George Soros most likely had in mind was rather “EU with austerity and Greece without any help from Russia”. Syriza complied accordingly with gusto.
As for Cultural Marxism, it can best be described as the sum total of zionism, fascism, and faggotry.
An interesting email regarding Greece/Russia/Ukraine from Iannis Carras (see his profiles from University of Freiburg, Eurozine, OpenDemocracy.net, Twitter) to Mathew Tsimitakis, columnist at the “conservative” Kathimerini, and Syriza’s party newspaper Avgi.
Tsimitakis was Syriza’s internet campaign organizer during the 2009 elections. In January 2015 he interviewed Alexis Tsipras right before the elections that brought Syriza to power and in February 2016 he was appointed to PM Alexis Tsipras’s Press Office.
The email starts with the advice to Tsimitakis: “do not say you are doing this for Open Society because it is likely to close down doors. There’s a lot of suspicion about Open Society in
Greece, mainly because of its positions vis-à-vis the former Yugoslavia”
The objective is the preparation of a who’s who of the Greek lansdcape regarding the Ukraine issue (Greek media, businessmen, political parties, NGO’s, diplomats, military, religious leaders, emigré networks from the former USSR). The scope and Carras’ contacts are quite impressive. Anyway, the document is written directly in English, so you will be able to look into it in more detail.
I guess that this is part of the implementation of an action titled: Mapping the Ukrainian debate in Greece, co-authored by Masa Djordjevic, Donal Mac Fhearraigh (as per the file’s metadata) and which identified Iannis Carras as the best candidate for the job. The salary of the consultant was to be $6,500 gross for a 15-day job plus expenses and $1,700 for a research assistant (would that be Tsimitakis?). In his email Carras offers to share the pay 50/50 with Tsimitakis. I wonder whether he was talking about the whole $8,200 or the $1,700 portion…
To give a little background on the Greek political landscape, I would comment that Syriza and all the other Greek “non-communist left” was never meant to be anti-NWO, just to sound like it. I am not Spanish or Italian to speak of the Podemos or 5-star movements, but the sad reality for Greece is just that. For them, patriotism is next to an insult, religion is slightly better than despicable and tradition is like garlic to vampires. I could write a thesis on the issue, so I just mention this: it is telling that in March 2016 Tsimitakis, while serving at the PM’s press Office, tweeted jokingly about FYROM that “anyway everyone calls it Macedonia“. He went against the official position of several Greek governments and against Greek sentiment, falling in line with NATO/Open Society positions on the matter. They next day he quit his post.
Finishing this first post on the vineyard, a big thanks to The Saker and all the others for a superb job. Keep it up!
And yes, Iannis Carras confirmed the content of the leak.
A very interesting journal article by George Soros, philosophy of economics. Quite a thinker. Also provides some insight into his success in market speculation — and a marvelous explanation of the differences between the natural and social sciences. All in the first five pages. Well worth the read.
Thank you for the link to the article! :)
Can’t help myself in trying to relate the thinker in that article to the activities of the Soros Foundations. I’d still settle for the idea that Soros is an important asset (“hofjuden”) for the ruling powers and his foundations as fronts for the CIA’s covert operations for now. Lots of things to think about though…
Ali, not only that, but this:
Posted over at the currently active “Cafe,” is this BBC article:
Nooscope mystery: The strange device of Putin’s new man Anton Vaino”
While the article itself seems to attend to some sort of metaphysical “machine” (nonsensical rubbish?), I draw your attention to the chart included. It seems to be an attempt to relate human behavior to physical “reality,” in the interest of developing a model for interaction between the two that will assist in, basically, managing the masses (common folks or the 99.x %?).
I am reminded of the Soros philosophy of economics article and am now wondering whether other unusually successful investors, such as Warren Buffet, might have studied and applied the Soros-type economics philosophy. I see little separation to be found between “economics” and “politics”; so however impossible it may be to measure and assess human behavior on a very large scale, it is a skill most certainly to be desired by those who seek to control the world, or even a single “country.”
As for the “device,” it sounds like something discovered on one of those fictional planets in Star Trek or Star Gate — but then we are all now very aware that lots of stuff that was once fictional is now real, and perhaps this is the connection — does imagination lead to or result in “reality”? And how do these realities compare to the realities provided by Nature?
Hi there :)
I think some caution is needed when we come across ideas such as those in Soro’s paper as well as that chart in the BBC article which is obviously being portrayed as something radical and alien.
Actually, some of those terms used in the BBC chart are familiar to me, since years ago I came across a book that deals with the image and reality of the Palestine conflict. The book if I recall correctly talks about false perceptions of the conflict and especially with the western media’s portrayal of the conflict vs the actual reality in Palestine.
Also, Soro’s ideas regarding the non-valid economic “laws” and theories are not new to me. Henry George’s books and ideas of the late 1800s and early 1900s already criticized the prevailing economic school of thought and even sought to identify those “laws” were actually part of the problem created by the ruling classes to hang on to their monopoly/control of land and capital. With regards to his use of “fallability” and “reality”, I think those are modern terms used in behavioural sciences and should not arouse out-of-this world ideas.
Probably they are the same attempts to try to map and formulise human behaviour for political and economic purposes by the intelligentsia for the ruling class, just that probably they are trying to “correct” and add in new “variables” to better prove their contrarian/successful idea and theories as new events unfolds.
Economics is politics and vice versa. That’s why the old school term: political economy!
FSB should poison him with Botulinum
I have followed Soros for 16 years… ever since I heard about his poppy drug business in Afghanistan after 9/11. I have been looking for statistics on how many countries he and his NWO where they have sponsored revolutions. Between his color revolutions, his other revolutions, and his manipulation of the economies.. I know he has broken the banks in many countries… I know he was in Africa, Italy, Greece, Germany, France, England, US, Middle east.. and infinite number of other countries.. like Philippines, Macedonia, Georgia, Chechnya, Kosovo… I know he has organizations all over the world… and he uses them as ‘humanitarian groups’.. but his NGOs are the opposite. With all his grants he receives from countries.. Why is he sponsoring government activities.. ie; Revolutions.? He caused their destruction, then banks on their rebuilding.. and he ends up making fortunes… I know Russia was the first country to expose him.. and since then.. there has been a global war against the ‘wicked’ Putin.. and evil Russia… Soros is the most evil man I know. He owns the DNC, 70% of the media.. and makes it his life’s purpose to cause chaos and disorder.. all with the goal of instilling his New World… he owes $6.7 billion in back taxes… why isn’t he in jail? Freeze his finances, investigate his connections, charge him with multiple crimes, and use his money to pay the millions of victims… the millions lost.. can’t be recovered but we can stop him… from ruining the world…
Why are all of the links in this no longer available?
Soros is an economic Hitman. You guys do follow this that every country he has help freed is a resource rich country. He is only helping his production investments in China.