by Straight-Bat for the Saker Blog
There are some incidents in life which a person would continue to review time and again, knowing pretty well that, it would be just a futile exercise from which he/she won’t really draw serious lessons (those who believe in learning from past deeds/misdeeds seldom forget the proverbial statement of Marx: ‘History repeats itself first as tragedy then as farce’). Similarly there are some historical events which intelligent people re-evaluate and reappraise repeatedly even after centuries – needless to say that, such reappraisals don’t stop the historical figures from different societies and different times from committing similar mistakes. Leaving aside the question of why and how political actors might indulge in erroneous reiteration of policy implementation, let me indulge in a simple exercise of re-evaluating – arguably the most prominent political leaders of inter-war Europe – Lenin and Stalin. Safeguarding the core interests of Russia during the world wars – I and II – was the greatest ‘sin’ of both Lenin and Stalin. Quite expectedly, the Zionist-Capitalist Deep State elites, who coordinated the 20th century ‘world order’, had been castigating Lenin and Stalin for all sufferings that the world has been infected with, since the beginning of 20th century.
As I said, some historical events remain ‘evergreen’ in terms of importance and impact – no other historical event in the past millennium was more intriguing and had more significance than WW-I and WW-II. And, Lenin and Stalin were the towering figures who influenced most decisively the outcome of WW-I and WW-II with respect to Russia. Having educated under Anglo-dominated education system, and spent working life under the influence of Zionist-Capitalist world order, I’m amply exposed to the 24×7 propaganda on so-called ‘cruelty’ and ‘sins’ of both Lenin and Stalin. Now in the diamond jubilee of Victory Day (Nazi Germany’s surrender to Soviet Union) it is time to explore the greatest ‘sins’ of the greatest ‘sinners’. Let history speak for itself.
This article will be primarily a mapping of political and economic event-vs.-timeline in the Eurasian landmass, with minimum commentary, as and when required, from my side. It would be better if history speaks for itself.
2. Soviet Russia at the End of WW-I
It is interesting to note that neither Russian empire nor German empire were adversary to each other to a very high degree of enmity. Actually both the Russian emperor and his cousin, the German emperor were reluctant antagonists in the WW-I, events of which from the very beginning (assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the heir to Austro-Hungarian Empire on 29th June, 1914, when he and his wife were on official trip in Sarajevo, Serbia that came under Austro-Hungarian rule after centuries of Ottoman Turk rule) to the very end (abolition of four empires in Europe and Asia i.e. Russian empire in 1917, Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1918, German Empire in 1918, Ottoman Turk Empire in 1922) were manipulated and managed by the Zionist-Capitalist Deep State consisting of the ruling elites of British, French, American (USA) empires (representing the interests of wealthy class of bankers-industrialists-landed aristocrats and other elites having substantial wealth and power).
2.1 Objectives of WW-I:
Even if the belligerents Nicholas II and Wilhelm II didn’t suspect in 1913 that a war was brewing, Polish leader Joseph Pilsudeski (most dedicated Zionist imperialist leader in 20th century east Europe ) had prior knowledge of the war plans and how it would end! Viktor Chernov, one of the founders of the Russian Socialist Revolutionary Party, wrote in his memoirs about a lecture by Josef Pilsudski, Polish leader delivered in Paris in early 1914. Chernov wrote:
“… Pilsudski confidently predicted the Balkans sparking an Austrian-Russian war in the near future … Pilsudski then set the question squarely: how would the war go down and who would triumph? His response reads as follows: Russia will be defeated by Austria and Germany who will in turn fall to the English and French (or English, Americans and French) …”
The WW-I primarily served three key purposes:
2.1.1 Due to the expansion of German empire in Africa as well as their world-wide business in the last quarter of 19th century, the Deep State of major colonial empires British and French increasingly came under the perception that German empire would very soon develop into a formidable competitor to their business of colonial empire across the world. WW-I wrecked the German empire as well as demolished the German economy to the extent that Germany couldn’t become a competitor to other European empires in the 20th century. Due to that, the British, French, Dutch, Belgium, USA colonial empires got a fresh lease of life.
2.1.2 In the European and Mediterranean geopolitical arena the longstanding empires like Russian, Ottoman Turk, and Austro-Hungarian Empires were obstinate in resisting the manipulations by Anglo and French rulers. The Anglo and French oligarchy found it very difficult to bring the entire European region under the influence of politics of liberal democracy whereby the elites of the society would create political parties, hold elections, and run government that will create a façade of people’s involvement in the governance (at the same time, however, everywhere in Europe the government, the central bank, and the economy would be owned and operated by the Deep State of major colonial empires). Due to destruction of 4 empires, the stage was set for the so-called transformation of most of the European societies to democracy
2.1.3 The Jewish and Anglo bankers and businessmen based in west European societies had been always in the forefront of the process of development of capitalism in Europe and the global colonies of European powers – starting from the ‘school’ of mercantile capitalism in 16th century, they ‘graduated’ from agrarian capitalism in 17th century, and in 18th century earned ‘master’s’ in industrial capitalism. The autocratic monarchy without democratic government proved to be impediment to the development and growth of capitalism in large part of Eurasia and east Europe. Destruction of four empires opened the floodgate of capitalistic development in those regions at the cost of common people who formed 90% of the population
2.2 Onset of WW-1:
After assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to Austro-Hungarian Empire on 29th June, 1914 in Sarajevo, Serbia Austro-Hungarian empire laid a claim on Serbia. Serbia resisted with backing from Russian empire. Germany and Austro-Hungarian unity was backed by historically German-speaking community in both Germany and Austria, while Orthodox Slavic culture was the bond between Russia and Serbia. If Austro-Hungarian and German leadership were confident that Russian empire would come forward to actively support Serbia in case of any conflict with Serbia, they would not have not crossed that line (since any attack on Russia would mean conflict with France, and any attack on France would mean conflict with Britain). Instead of peace-making efforts British and French diplomacy was busy adding fuel into the fire. British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey enticed Germany and Austro-Hungary at one side and Russia at the other side to declare war against each other, and then involved France and Britain in the war. Key events unfolded as below:
2.2.1 Instead of saying that Britain will support Russia, in July 1914 Grey told German ambassador that, Britain “cannot tolerate the destruction of France.” which meant that, in case of hot conflict between Germany and Russia, the British won’t come into picture unless France came under attack
2.2.2 Grey hosted Russian Ambassador Benckendorf after his meeting with the German ambassador, and expressed that Russia should come to Serbia’s defence when Austria attack Serbia
2.2.3 Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Sazonov proposed that Russia, England and France collectively pressure Austria, and force Austro-Hungarian Empire into a political settlement of their claims against Serbia. Grey rejected the proposal because that would have killed the entire war plan
2.2.4 On 23rd July, the Austrian ambassador to Serbia presented the Serbs with the ultimatum; Serbian Prince Regent Alexander sent telegram to Russian Tsar Nicholas II seeking help
2.2.5 On 28th July 1914, Austrian guns opened fire on Serbian land on the pretext that couple of clauses of Austrian demand were not agreed by Serbia
2.2.6 On 29th July, the Grey met twice with the German ambassador Lichnowsky. In the words of Lichnowsky “Grey declared that, the British government wished to maintain its former friendship with us, and it would stay out of it, since the conflict was limited to Austria and Russia. If, however, we pulled France into it, then the situation would dramatically change and the British government would potentially be compelled to take immediate action.” British and French Deep State not only organized the First World War, they tried to adjust the situation so that the fighting broke out only between Austria, Germany and Russia. They themselves wanted to stay out of it. Only when Russia and Germany destroy one another, the French and British forces will join the fight to extend their empire! (The Zionist-Capitalist imperialist Deep State followed same simple logic to plan for WW-II.)
2.2.7 Assuming that France and Britain would not join the conflict, on 31st July 1914 Germany (siding with Austro-Hungarian empire) declared war against Russia
2.2.8 France and Russia were party to ‘alliance treaty’ by which France should have come forward in support of Russia against German aggression on 31st July itself – but keeping in line with Grey’s diplomacy, against German query dated 31st July 1914 of whether or not Paris would remain neutral, France pulled back military forces 10 kilometers from the border and told that the action was “proof of France’s peaceful intentions”
2.2.9 But the duplicity was evident next day when French Prime Minister Viviani announced the military mobilization on 1st August 1914
2.2.10 On 3rd August 1914, Germany was left with only one option – to declare war on France
2.2.11 Next day on 4th August 1914, Britain entered the war to help France and Belgium. Thus with an ulterior motive of complete destruction of Russia and Germany, British and French empires ensured that the Austro-Hungarian animosity towards Serbians (culminated through the murder conspiracy) would engulf all key powers of Europe and Eurasia in WW-I viz. Austro-Hungarian Empire, German Empire, Russian Empire, colonial empires of Britain and France.
2.2.11 At the onset of WW-I in 1914, Russian Empire consisted of the following regions/countries in European territory (naming convention as it exists now):
- Ukraine except Western Galician region
- North-Eastern Warsaw-Lublin region of Poland
- Moldova (and Transnistria region)
Eastern (Russian) Theatre of WW-I encompassed at its greatest extent the frontier between the Russian Empire and Romania on one side and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, German Empire, Bulgaria, and Ottoman Turk Empire on the other. It stretched from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south, involved Eastern Europe. Between August 1914 and the end of 1914, Russian empire was advancing against German and Austro-Hungarian forces, but 1915 onwards German and Austro-Hungarian forces were on the offensive (except Galician and Romanian regions where Brusilov Offensive worked in favour of Russian empire). German-Austrian advance was stopped at the end of 1915 on the line Riga–Dvinsk–Dünaburg–Baranovichi–Pinsk–Lutsk–Ternopil. That imply, the Russian Empire already lost by the beginning of 1916 the following regions/countries in European territory (naming convention as it exists now):
- Large part of Ukraine
- Large part of Belarus
- Large part of Poland
2.3 March (February) Revolution in 1917:
The above mentioned front line did not change significantly until the abdication of Russian Tsar in March 1917 when ‘February Revolution’ was instigated by the following 3 political parties and Provisional Government was formed in Petrograd (Leningrad / St. Petersburg) by the Provisional Committee of the State Duma:
- Constitutional Democratic Party (support base – professionals, academicians, lawyers)
- Socialist Revolutionary Party (support base – peasantry, agrarian labour)
- RSDLP-Menshevik faction (support base – industrial labour, intellectuals with moderate view)
Economy of Russian Empire bore the brunt of the mobilisation and losses in WW-I. Gross industrial production in 1917 decreased by around 36% of what it had been in 1914. Real wages (inflation adjusted) fell to about 50% compared to what they had been in 1913. Over and above that, to meet the war expenditures, Russian Tsarist government took debt of more than 50 billion roubles. In and around Petrograd, discontent with the monarchy erupted into mass protests mainly against food rationing on 23 February (8 March). Mass demonstrations, violent clashes with police and gendarmes, industrial strikes continued for days. On 27 February (12 March) mutinous Russian forces sided with revolutionaries – 3 days later on 15 March Tsar Nicholas II abdicated ending Romanov dynastic rule. In the new post-Tsarist era, State Duma was led first by Prince Georgy Lvov and then by Alexander Kerensky.
There are two groups of ‘nationalist’ intellectuals with leftist and rightist views in Russia and Europe who share, rather a delusional view of 1917 anti-monarchist revolution – they think that the Zionist anti-Orthodox and anti-Russian oligarchy and elites of Europe conspired with Bolshevik communists (popular feeling was all communists are atheist) to destroy the ‘Russian’ Tsar Empire and Orthodox Slavic society (fact of the matter was Romanovs were a German clan migrated from Prussian region). This group of intellectuals forget that (a) for at least two centuries Russian empire was one of the most unequal oppressive hierarchical feudal society, and people from industrial working class, peasantry, soldiers were spontaneously agitating for most basic of the rights – right for food, and (b) in March 1917, Bolshevik communists were completely outsmarted by the above mentioned three party combination, who ousted Tsar and his council of ministers to form Provisional Government – had the Provisional Government not messed up, Bolshevik party would have to wait few decades to come to power.
Historian Alexander Rabinowitch summarised the causes of February 1917 revolution: “The February 1917 revolution … grew out of pre-war political and economic instability, technological backwardness, and fundamental social divisions, coupled with gross mismanagement of the war effort, continuing military defeats, domestic economic dislocation, and outrageous scandals surrounding the monarchy”.
The Zionist-Capitalist imperialist Deep State, was pleased with the abdication by Tsar and the installation of the Provisional Government. They were very swift in recognising the government:
USA government recognition on 22 March 1917
UK, France, Italy government recognition on 24 March 1917
The haste with which the Zionist-Capitalist Deep State (the same elites who manipulated the events that led to entry of Germany and Russia in WW-I) welcomed the Provisional Government led by three anti-Bolshevik parties prove that, the Zionist-Capitalist elites were indeed anti-Tsar anti-Orthodox and anti-Russian, but they teamed up with anti-Bolshevik regime; and identifying Zionist-Capitalist elites with Bolsheviks would be no more than Orwellian truth.
Various estimates suggest Russian empire had around six million casualties (dead, missing, and wounded) during WW-I before January 1917. On the war front, by January 1917 everything was bleak – inadequate supply of arms-ammunition-food, incompetent officers, war-weariness among soldiers, mutinies among soldiers demanding end to war efforts, abnormally low level of morale among officers and soldiers, etc. And, on the home front burning issues like inflation, poverty, scarcity of food commodities, overstretched railway network, and millions of refugees from German-occupied Russia combined to bring a nightmare in Russian empire.
Initial composition of the Provisional Government formed mainly by three parties was led by Minister-President and Minister of the Interior Georgy Lvov. After July crisis, on 6th August 1917 the Second coalition cabinet was formed under the leadership of Alexander Kerensky (Minister-President and Minister of War and Navy). The Third Provisional government led by Minister-President Alexander Kerensky was formed on 8th October 1917. The Provisional Government was inherently weak and incompetent – even if they passed new laws and policies, implementation and enforcement of the same lacked ingenuity. The Provisional Government had internal contradictions on the issue of continuation of WW-I – Kerensky Offensive was launched with disastrous results. Opposition from common people to government policies and war efforts increased by the day.
On 14th March 1917 the Petrograd Soviet issued “Order No. 1,” which instructed the troops to disarm their officers. This was one of the significant instances where Provisional Government and Soviet both wanted to assert their power. To restore Army’s morale Kerensky launched an offensive (Kerensky Offensive) on 1st July which ended in a military catastrophe – morale of the Russian Army went down further. In September 1917 the then commander-in-chief of the Russian army, General Lavr Kornilov’s troops approached Petrograd, apparently to seize power in a military coup. Kerensky arrested them. The Kornilov affair remain unresolved till now. The exist a line of thought which suggest that Kornilov and Kerensky reached an agreement before the troop movement by which it was agreed that power would be shared by two of them; however in reality, Kerensky’s actions were betrayal of Kornilov. Whatever might the reality, relation between Provisional Government and Russian Army hit a new low.
2.4 November (October) Revolution in 1917:
While the country was rapidly sinking in chaos and disorder, the Bolshevik party under Lenin’s leadership quickly recovered the organisational ground lost to the Menshevik Party and Socialist Revolutionary Party in the beginning of 1917, by (a) positioning the Petrograd Soviet as a working committee which was more competent compared to the Provisional Government (indeed, Petrograd Soviet managed to take over the control of Petrograd, the most important trading and port city, gained control of the Imperial Army, and the Russian Railways beside their already existing control of local factories); (b) steadily weakening the three parties who were the backbone of the Provisional Government through pulling the left-minded members of those parties within the fold of Bolshevik party (within just 7 months, intellectual voices almost became non-existent in those three parties which outsmarted Bolshevik party in seizing state power; and, (c) creating the Red Guard units in March 1917 as paramilitary volunteer organizations (comprised mainly of factory workers, peasants, soldiers, sailors) for “protection of the soviet power”. They fought to protect and extend the power of the soviets (like Petrograd Soviet).
Continuous shortage of food, and other supplies created tremendous unrest – there were mass strikes by millions of workers in Petrograd, Moscow, Donbas, Urals, and Central Industrial Region during September and October 1917. The factory committees coordinated workers’ strike and negotiated better pay, working hours, and working conditions. During the same time, the peasant community lost faith that the land would be distributed to them by the Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries – peasant movements targeted against the landowners spread to 482 of 624 counties. Seizures of land as well as marches on landowner manors became common. Spectre of famine generated a tendency of storing grains rather than selling them in the market. Soldiers and sailors became unionised and they started ignoring the authority of the Provisional Government.
Families of soldiers would incite “subsistence riots”/ “hunger riots” during which rural citizens seized food and other supplies from shop owners, who they believed to be charging higher prices.
The Central Committee of Bolshevik party made the decision on 23rd October to seize power. Red Guards forces attached with Bolshevik party began to occupy the government buildings on 7th November, 1917. The following day, the Winter Palace was captured. The Military-Revolutionary Committee coordinated the Red Guards activities. On 8th November, 1917 the Second Congress of Soviets elected a new cabinet of Bolsheviks known as the Council (Soviet) of People’s Commissars, with Lenin as leader. The cabinet passed the Decree on Peace and the Decree on Land which were approved by the Second Congress of the Soviet of Workers’, Soldiers’, and Peasants’ Deputies.
Historical timeline shows that the first seizure of power in Tallinn by Soviet happened on 5th November 1917, next in Petrograd, Minsk, Novgorod, Ivanovo-Voznesenski and Tartu on 7th November 1917, next in Ufa, Kazan, Yekaterinburg, and Narva on 8th November 1917. Significant power seizures included Pskov, Moscow, and Baku on 15th November 1917, Sevastopol on 29th December 1917, Kiev and Vologda on 8th February 1918, and the last on 25th February 1918 in Novocherkassk.
The Constituent Assembly elections were held on 25th November 1917. On 18th January 1918 the Constituent Assembly had its first and only day in session. The Constituent Assembly rejected Soviet decrees on peace and land that prompted the Congress of Soviets to dissolve the Constituent Assembly.
Apart from the peace and land decrees, Soviet issued other decrees which clearly established their ideology as pro-poor as their party claimed:
- Nationalization of private property
- Nationalization of Russian banks
- Expropriation of Church properties
- Expropriation of private bank accounts
- Repudiation of foreign debts
- Higher rates of wages for workers
- Introduction of eight-hour working in factories and other establishments
2.5 WW-I Peace Treaty in 1918:
There were three views prevalent in 1917 Russia:
- Continue fighting in WW-I to defend liberty and “Russian honour” – Kerensky (initially the Minister of War, thereafter the Prime Minister of the Provisional Government) was a proponent of this opinion
- Opinion called as “revolutionary defensism” suggested achieving peace without annexations and indemnities. Supporters of this view didn’t have much fervour for territorial gains or Pan-Slavic liberation, but if pushed to the wall they were not ready to formally accept defeat
- Another view called “defeatism” was held by the Bolshevik Party leaders who proposed that WW-I was an ”imperialist war” where common people were being killed for the expansionist designs of empires – they also wished to achieve peace without annexations and indemnities, but if pushed to the wall they were ready to formally accept defeat
Lenin’s call for cessation of hostilities in WW-I was backed by hard realities of poverty among common Russians and shortage of supplies for Russian Army – Lenin was neither swayed by the aristocratic ‘glory and glamour’ of the Tsarist empire nor influenced by ritualistic ‘patriotism’ parroted by bourgeois and Menshevik socialist politicians. The Decree on Peace called “upon all the belligerent nations and their governments to start immediate negotiations for peace” – peace may be decorative item for oligarchy and aristocracy, but peace is an essential element of plebeian life. Lenin was particularly scathing in exposing the role WW-I played for Russian people’s suffering – food shortage, tax rise, rising cost of living, refugee crisis, etc.
Trotsky was appointed Commissar of Foreign Affairs in new Bolshevik government. Trotsky appointed Adolph Joffe to represent the Bolsheviks at the peace conference with the Central Powers. The key events were:
2.5.1 An armistice between Russia and the Central Powers (German empire, Austro-Hungarian empire, Bulgaria, and Ottoman empire) was concluded on 15th December 1917. A week later peace negotiations started in Brest-Litovsk
2.5.2 Kaiser Wilhelm II, Chief of Imperial German Army Paul Hindenburg, Army General Max Hoffmann, Army General Erich Ludendorff, Foreign Minister Richard Kuhlmann, these five high priests of German imperialism were the main actors on German side during negotiation. On the Russian side Lenin, Trotsky, Bukharin, Stalin were main actors during negotiation.
2.5.3 Germany agreed to Russian demand of peace with “no annexations or indemnities”, but with proposition that Poland and Lithuania will be independent on the basis of ‘self-determination’ (obviously both the so-called independent state will align with German empire). One of the Russian negotiation team member, noted Marxist historian Mikhail Pokrovsky wept and asked how they could speak of “peace without annexations, when Germany was tearing eighteen provinces away from the Russian state”
2.5.4 On 1st January 1918, the Kaiser discussed with Hoffmann on future German-Polish border during which Hoffman suggested Germany should take a small slice of Poland. Hindenburg and Ludendorff were of different opinion who, being the winning side, wanted much more territorial acquisitions including Baltic countries. Ukrainian Rada declared independence from Russia, and demanded the Polish city of Cholm and its surroundings.
2.5.5 During 1st week of February 1918, a group of ‘Left’ Communists comprising of Nikolai Bukharin and Karl Radek wanted to continue the war with a newly-raised revolutionary force while awaiting for socialist revolution in Germany, Austria, and Turkey. Trotsky wanted to “announce the termination of the war and demobilization without signing any peace”. Lenin advocated for signing an early deal rather than having even more disastrous treaty after a few more weeks of military defeats.
2.5.6 Peace negotiation started on 10th February 1918 and Trotsky proposed the German side his concept of ‘no war and no peace’, and abstained from drawing any conclusion
2.5.7 German General Hoffmann notified Russian team on 16th February 1918 that German Army would resume their attack on Russia because peace treaty was not signed. On 18th February 1918 Lenin’s resolution that Russia sign the treaty was supported by Central Committee. Lenin convinced the majority of Bolshevik party leadership (most of whom, as a first choice, wanted a new war to be waged against imperialist Central Powers) that a peace treaty with the Central Powers is a must for the new Bolshevik revolution to sustain in the long run – historical facts show, extremely unfavourable environment at that point of time in Russia because (a) Food shortage was rampant which created large scale civil unrest, (b) Tsarist Army was in complete disorder while Red Army was being built from scratch, and (c) lack of strength of German socialist party to compel their government to cease offensive (as part of WW-I) on Russian front
2.5.8 Germany launched Operation Faustschlag on 18th February 1918. General Hoffmann advanced further into Russian territory till 22nd February 1918, and on 23rd February 1918 he tabled new terms for peace treaty that included withdrawal of all Russian troops from Finland and Ukraine
2.5.9 Trotsky resigned as foreign minister. Sokolnikov arrived at Brest-Litovsk to represent Soviet Russian Bolshevik government, and the peace treaty (called as Treaty of Brest-Litovsk) was signed on 3rd March 1918
2.5.10 With this treaty, Russia had to renounce all territorial claims in
- Russian part of Poland (was under possession of White Army);
Russia was also fined 300 million gold marks. Consequently, Russia lost one-third of its population, half of its industrial land, one-fourth of its railway, three-quarters of iron ore, and nine-tenth of its coalfields as German side insisted that Russia has to cede more than 150,000 sq. km. of territories.
2.5.11 This treaty was annulled by the Armistice of 11th November 1918 when Germany surrendered to the Entente Powers (excluding Russia). The Bolshevik legislature (VTsIK) annulled the treaty on 13th November 1918
2.6 Russian Civil War and Formation of Soviet Union:
Anti-Bolshevik groups landowners, bankers, middle-class citizens, monarchists, army senior officers, and politicians like liberals-conservatives-democrats as well as non-Bolshevik socialists aligned against the Bolshevik Communist government. The anti-Bolshevik groups were collectively known as ‘White Army’ who controlled significant parts of the former Russian Empire between 1918 and 1920.
In January 1918 Trotsky headed the reorganization of the existing Red Guards into a Workers’ and Peasants’ Red Army in order to create a more efficient military force. In June 1918 Trotsky instituted mandatory conscription of the peasantry into the Red Army, and inducted former Tsarist Army officers as “specialists”. By 1922, more than one-third of all Red Army officers were ex-Tsarist Army officers. To prevent sabotage, the orders of ex-Tsarist Army officers were subject to approval by Bolshevik political commissars assigned to the unit. At the height of the Civil War the Red Army numbered almost five million men. Trotsky was the overall Commander and the Chairman of the Revolutionary War Council.
The Civil War in the military sense was fought on several fronts. The key events during the civil war between the ‘White Army’ and ‘Red Army’ were:
2.6.1 Czechoslovak Legion (by end of 1917, the Legion had more than 60,000 soldiers) was granted permission to evict from Ukraine in February 1918 by the Bolshevik government – since most of Russia’s main ports were blockaded, the Legion would travel from Ukraine to port of Vladivostok, where the men would embark on ocean-going vessels. The slow evacuation by Trans-Siberian Railway was aggravated by shortage of transport vehicles. On 14th May 1918 at Chelyabinsk Legion forces attacked POW and revolted against Bolshevik authorities. The Red Army lost control over Volga, Ural, and Siberia regions along the Trans-Siberian Railway. The Czechoslovak Legion occupied more cities in along the Railway route, including Nizhneudinsk, Kurgan, Novonikolaevsk, Mariinsk, Kansk, Samara, Kuznetsk, Irkutsk, and Chita. With Bolshevik forces on retreat, the White Army occupied Petropavl, Omsk, and Syzran, and advanced towards Saratov and Kazan. By 1919 relation between the Legion forces and White Army deteriorated sharply. Between December 1919 and September 1920, the Legion evacuated by sea from Vladivostok.
2.6.2 Western Siberia was the theatre for another White Army – Admiral Kolchak assumed command of this army in November 1918. During the summer and fall of 1919 Kolchak launched successful offensives against Red Army. In the spring of 1919 while approaching the shores of the Volga he was stopped and defeated by the Red Army. He was captured and shot without a trial, and his army disintegrated quickly.
2.6.3 Eastern Siberia Japanese forces entered through Vladivostok in August 1918 strength of which later increased to 70,000 troops. The Japanese were joined by British, USA, Canadian, French, and Italian troops. On 5 September 1918, the Japanese forces linked up with the vanguard of the Czechoslovak Legion. The Japanese forces ventured up to the west of Lake Baikal. By November, they occupied all ports and towns in Siberia east of Chita and the maritime provinces. The British, French, and Italian contingents marched westward to support Kolchak’s White Army.
2.6.4 Southern Russia & Ukraine had Volunteer Army organized among the Cossacks by General Alekseyev and General Kornilov in the winter of 1917-18. General Anton Denikin took over after death of Alekseyev and Kornilov. To extend material support to the White Army the French Army occupied Odessa and Sevastopol on 18th December 1918, a month after the WW-I armistice. In October 1919, Denikin’s Army, augmented by French and British aid and supplies, reached Orel about 250 kilometres south of Moscow. The Red Army crushed Denikin’s Army in the subsequent battles waged in October and November 1919. In the Crimean peninsula General Wrangel reorganized his army and held on for a while, from where it was dislodged on 14th November 1920 when General Wrangel fled Russia.
2.6.5 Caucasus also had its own share of civil war. In 1917, Allied military troops from British forces (and its colonies – Australia and Canada) deployed across Qajar Persia to seize Baku oil fields. The force fought the Red Army at Enzeli, then proceeded by ship to the port of Baku on the Caspian Sea. Ottoman forces clashed with Allied forces in September 1918. After the Ottoman Empire withdrew its forces from the borders of Azerbaijan in the middle of November 1918, fresh British troops arrived in Baku on 17 November.
2.6.6 North Russia was the most intensely battled region (apart from Baltic). To counter German troops that landed in Finland in April 1918 (who could capture Murmansk–Petrograd railway, ice-free port of Murmansk, and city of Arkhangelsk including supply warehouses) and to actively participate in anti-Bolshevik struggle of the White Army, the Allied block sent a huge force to north Russia. The military force comprising of army and navy of Zionist-Capitalist powers (UK and colonies, USA, France, and Italy) led by a British officer Lt. General Poole, launched anti-Bolshevik operation in late May-June 1918 in Arkhangelsk. On 2nd August 1918 Tsarist Russian officer staged a coup under tutelage of General Poole against the local Bolshevik government, and seized power.
In September 1918, the Allied Powers captured Obozerskaya. Their invasion followed the routes of both banks of the Northern Dvina river in the east, Vaga river and Onega river in the west, and Arkhangelsk Railway. Fighting was heavy – after initial gain by Allied forces, Red Army fought back. By next four months the Allied Powers’ gains shrunk to only around 50 km along the Northern Dvina and Lake Onega Area. USA forces fought their last major battle at Bolshie Ozerki from 31st March till 4th April 1919. From April 1919, the inability to defend the flanks and mutinies in the White Army caused the Allied Powers to decide complete withdrawal. On 27th September 1919, the last Allied troops departed from Archangelsk. Murmansk was abandoned on 12th October 1919.
Estonian Commander Laidoner rescinded his command over the White Russians on 19th June 1919, and they were renamed the Northwestern Army under the command of General Yudenich. The Northwestern Army on 9th October 2019 launched Operation White Sword to capture Petrograd with arms-ammunition provided by Britain and France. With the help of Estonian Army, Estonian Navy, and British Royal Navy Yudenich’s troops approached to within 16 km of Petrograd. The Red Army repulsed them back to the Narva River, and launched a counter-offensive in December 1919. Defeated and disorganised, some White Army soldiers retreated beyond Estonian state border and the remnants of the Army were evacuated from Arkhangelsk in February 1920. The Bolsheviks took Arkhangelsk on 20th February 1920 and Murmansk on 13th March 1920.
2.6.7 Baltic campaign of British military (Operation Red Trek) was the biggest naval intervention starting from November 1918 in Russia by the imperialist powers especially UK. British Royal Navy ships supported the Estonian and Latvian anti-Bolshevik troops by bombarding the Red Army positions on land. British military provided military supplies to the anti-Bolshevik troops and denied the Bolsheviks the ability to move by sea. The Russian Baltic Fleet, though severely depleted after WW-I, was still relevant to the Red Army for protection of Petrograd. The Estonian High Command pushed across the border into Russia and initiated an offensive Narva – the attack was supported by British Navy and Estonian Navy. The Estonian Pskov offensive commenced at the same time on 13th May 1919 and captured Petseri town by 25th May to clear the land between Estonia and Velikaya River (to facilitate northern White Army movements). In the summer of 1919, the Royal Navy boxed up the Red fleet in Kronstadt. In the autumn of 1919, British forces provided gunfire support to General Yudenich’s White Army which launched a failed offensive against Bolshevik-held Petrograd. On 2nd February 1920, Soviet Russia signed the peace treaty recognising Estonian independence – this resulted in withdrawal of British Navy from Baltic.
In November 1918 Latvia proclaimed independence, but Red Army launches its assault on the pro-White Latvian troops on 1st December 1918 and moved forward to control most of the territory by February 1919. German and Latvian forces launch counterattack on Red Army on 3rd March 1919. Pro-German nobility formed army and tried to establish their authority before ceasefire on 3rd July. The anti-Bolshevik West Russian Volunteer Army attacked Riga on 8th October, but was defeated after five weeks of fighting. The joint forces of Poland and Latvia launched an attack on the Bolsheviks in Latgale and took Daugavpils. Latvia signed cease-fire on 1st February 1920 with Soviet Russia, and on 15th July 1920 with Germany.
2.6.8 When it became evident that the Red Army and the Bolshevik government has effectively organised themselves across Soviet Russia to crush all resistances by different White Army as well as foreign forces, all Allied forces were evacuated by 1920, apart from the Japanese forces who stayed until 1922. Estimates of the casualties of the Civil War, most of them civilian victims range from a minimum of 10 million to 25 million
2.6.9 By 1921 the Red Army reoccupied all those regions that were part of the defunct Russian Empire except Poland (Poland also seized western part of Ukraine and western part of Byelorussia), and Baltic region (Lithuania-Latvia-Estonia-Finland). On 29th December 1922 a conference of plenipotentiary delegations from the Russian SFSR, the Trans-Caucasian SFSR, the Ukrainian SSR and the Byelorussian SSR approved the Treaty on the Creation of the USSR and the Declaration of the Creation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). These two documents were confirmed by the 1st Congress of Soviets of the USSR. The first USSR constitution was formally adopted in January 1924.
The most agonising irony of this historical period was that, White Army was seeking support (in the name of Tsar) from same imperialists who completely destroyed Tsarist empire just 3 years back. The-then zionist-capitalist Deep State in UK-France-USA-Japan-Italy withdrew all support and threw the Russian White Army contingents into bottomless pit when they found Soviet Russia had built a strong new army – the Red Army.
There exists a view shared by so-called “nationalist” and “patriotic” leaders of past and present Russia – had Bolshevik party led by Lenin not interfered with Russia’s involvement in WW-I to sign a peace treaty with Germany (and its allies), Russia would have been in the ‘winning team’ of the Entente Powers and would have got a share of the booty flowing out of the Versailles Treaty signed just 8 months later. This view is untenable when scrutinised deeply. Had Russia been active on the WW-I war front even after February 1918, they could have lost even more territory that could include Russia proper. By 1916, Russian Army was not only hopelessly short of food, clothing, ammunitions, and other logistics in the war front, but Russian Army morale was, to a large extent, shattered; moreover Red Army was not yet in complete shape. Strategically, Lenin proved to be far-sighted – he could sense that, with USA officially entering the WW-I on 6th April 1917, Entente Powers would win against Central Powers, and those Zionist-Capitalist powers would directly control the vast east European territories (earlier part of Tsar Russia, but lost to Germany during WW-I). Lenin assessed that concluding a peace treaty with Germany in February 1918, while control of at least Russia proper was still with Bolshevik party, was administratively better than, simultaneously facing onslaught of German Army (in absence of a peace treaty) plus assault of White Army buttressed by active support from anti-communist governments of about 15 countries that included significant imperialist power like:
- UK, Australia, Canada
- Romania etc.
History proved Lenin’s sagacity – after the conspiracy by British diplomat Bruce Lockhart to sabotage the Bolshevik government in 1918 got exposed, from 1918 till 1921 the Zionist-Capitalist hyenas were out to dismember Russia proper in dozens of pieces using the White Army generals Yudenich, Kolchak, Denikin, and few others, but with German Army neutralized along most of the front, the Red Army valiantly fought against them for unification of Soviet Russia.
2.7 Who Ultimately Won WW-I?
Genoa Economic and Financial Conference was held in Genoa, Italy from 10th April to 19th May 1922, as planned by British PM David Lloyd George. Primarily the objective was how the European countries can deal with the pariah states of Germany and Russia to resolve the major economic issues.
The Zionist-Capitalist Deep State comprising of more than 30 countries including the imperialist powers UK, France claimed that Soviet Russian (Bolshevik) government need to pay them (a) pre-WW-I debts plus interests, (b) war time debts plus interests, (c) all assets provided to the White Army plus interests, (d) cost of all enterprises, which had been owned by foreign citizens. Total claim was worth 18 billion golden roubles. The expectations were that the Bolshevik government would surrender Soviet Russian economy and become a kind of colony of UK-France-Italy.
Lenin’s government submitted a counterclaim 30 billion golden roubles that would pay for the losses due to foreign intervention and the blockade during the civil war. While the imperialist Deep State delegates were busy discussing the unbelievable ‘audacity’ of the Soviet government, the Soviet Russian delegates concluded a pioneering agreement with Germany on 16th April 1922 in Rapallo, the Genoa suburb. Both sides accepted the nullification of Brest-Litovsk Treaty, mutually gave up their territorial and financial claims (like reimbursement of military expenses and civilian losses), Germany acknowledged nationalization of (German state and private) property in Soviet Russia. West European delegations came to know about this Agreement only after it had been signed previous night.
Soviet Russian delegates offered the Zionist-Capitalist Deep State a softer version of Soviet claim – Soviet government would acknowledge pre-war debts of Russia and would provide former owners the right to lease their ex-property or to take it on concession; in lieu of that UK-France-Italy were to acknowledge the Soviet government and provide it with financial support, forgive war debts and interests, acknowledged nationalization of enterprises. The Soviet delegation stuck to their stand during the Hague conference in June, 1922. The objective of the conferences, obviously, were not achieved (by the-then Deep State).
At every step of statecraft – economic, political, diplomatic, and military – Lenin outmanoeuvred the zionist-capitalist oligarchy based in imperialist Anglo and French countries. Their revulsion about Lenin was so complete that they refused to recognise USSR while Lenin was alive! Only after his death on 21st January 1924, USSR was recognised by European and American imperialist powers – UK on 2nd February 1924, France on 28th October 1924, Italy on 7th February 1924, and USA on 16th November 1933.
Soviet Union was constructed on the same map where Tsarist Russian Empire once existed, albeit with smaller footprint. Led by Lenin, the new country set out on the journey of a social development free from ALL sorts of exploitation unheard of in the entire human history. Soon Russia and its imperial adversary Germany patched up in order to tackle their own financial and economic problems. In the final assessment, one can conclude that it was Lenin’s Soviet Union which won the WW-I by not allowing the Zionist-Capitalist Deep State to ruin the Eurasian landmass. And, that fact didn’t go down well with the Zionist-Capitalist oligarchy of imperialists like UK-France-Italy-Japan-USA, who again started next round of conspiracy to draw Soviet Union and Germany into yet another devastating war.
3. Soviet Union and Germany during WW-II
No sooner had the news spread about signing of the Treaty of Rapallo on 16th April 1922 night than the Zionist-Capitalist powers started their plan for another round of conflict between Russia and Germany in order to ruin both. In the 1920s neither Russia nor Germany remained empires ruled by aristocracy, but WW-II remained same old story just like WW-I – a web of deception and conspiracy pieced together by Zionist-Capitalist elites.
3.1 Objectives of WW-II:
In the section 6. ‘Geopolitics 1930 onwards’ of my earlier article ‘Bridging China’s Past with Humanity’s Future – Part 2, I recapitulated on the objectives of Zionist-Capitalist Deep State related to WW-II.
[Link: http://thesaker.is/bridging-chinas-past-with-humanitys-future-part-2/ ]
I would like to quote it here, since it is pertinent:
“ With the setting up of Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Switzerland in 1930, the disputes and tussle among the most prominent Jewish and Anglo banker families (like Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Warburg, Lazard, et al.) over type of business, geographical region of influence, and share of banking sector operations got resolved. The Zionist-Capitalist elites were fully united in words and deeds notwithstanding the occasional rivalry and difference of opinion between followers of two camps: Rothschild and Rockefeller. The long-term objective of the Zionist-Capitalist Deep State clique (representing primarily the Jewish, Anglo, Dutch, French, German oligarch and aristocrat families who had accumulated wealth and have been engaged in business in banking-land-industry-trading) after WW-I has been to establish a hegemonic world order which would:
- own ‘political process and power’ in every society/country on the earth
- own ‘economic process and wealth’ in every landmass/country/ocean on the earth
- control ‘socio-cultural process and population’ in every region/country on the earth
I find it difficult to consider that, ‘winning’ political power anywhere in the world, has ever been an objective of the Deep State – they want to ‘own’ the process through which any political party may be made to ‘win’ or ‘loose’ power depending on short-term and long-term interest of the Deep State.
The Zionist-Capitalist Deep State crystallized in its existing form when WW-II started in 1936 (with signing of anti-communist pact between Germany, Italy, and Japan). Expectations of the Zionist-Capitalist Deep State were destruction of powerful societies (non- Anglo/Jewish/Dutch/French) who had potential to develop advanced economy, and expansion of Zionist-Capitalist empire:
- combatants Fascist Germany and Communist Soviet Union decimating each other’s (i) military forces, (ii) physical infrastructure, and (iii) population across entire Eurasia;
- combatants Fascist Japan and Nationalist China decimating each other’s (i) military forces, (ii) physical infrastructure, and (iii) population across entire East Asia;
- stages (a) and (b) would be followed by occupation of whole Europe and Asia by the ‘benevolent’ Anglo-American military who would claim that they have ‘liberated’ these ancient civilizations from the ‘authoritarian dictatorships’ of fascism and communism;
- stage (c) would be followed by establishment of ‘liberal democratic capitalism’ version of empire (as against ‘colonial extractive capitalism’ version) in whole Europe and Asia to continue plunder of wealth in maximum possible way;
Unfortunately half of the objectives remained unfulfilled in the WW-II that was over by 1945 – because of two political parties: Communist Party of Soviet Union (CPSU) and Communist Party of China (CPC) whose top leadership mobilised their countrymen in collective patriotic spirit, Soviet Union and China didn’t capitulate but their direct adversaries (Germany and Japan) were trounced. “
3.2 Prelude to WW-II:
Treaty of Versailles to end WW-I was signed on 28th June 1919 in Versailles exactly 5 years after assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, with stringent conditions that impacted Germany’s economy. Harsh conditions of the Treaty of Versailles created a kind resentment among the Germans as well as other peace-loving Europeans, for they anticipated a violent reaction in future from the German population against such humiliating treaty.
3.2.1 Conditions of Treaty of Versailles
Territorial implications – Germany was stripped of 65,000 sq. km. of territory and 7 million people. Germany had to give up all direct territorial gains and protectorates via the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Germany would recognize Belgian sovereignty over Moresnet and Eupen-Malmedy. Germany was to cede the control of Saar to League of Nations for 15 years, after which a plebiscite would decide sovereignty. France would control Alsace-Lorraine. A plebiscite would decide sovereignty of Schleswig-Holstein. Germany would recognize the independence of Czechoslovakia including some parts of Upper Silesia. Germany would recognize the independence of Poland including some portions of Upper Silesia, East Prussian Soldau area, Posen, and eastern Pomerania. Sovereignty of Southern East Prussia would be decided via plebiscite. Thus Poland got about 51,000 sq. km. area at the expense of Germany. Germany would cede Danzig and its hinterland for the League of Nations to establish the Free City of Danzig.
German colonies in Africa were converted into League of Nations mandates. Togoland and Cameroon were transferred to France. Ruanda and Burundi were transferred to Belgium. Britain got German East Africa, and (UK’s colony) South Africa got German South-West Africa. Kionga Triangle in northern Mozambique was allocated to Portugal. German Samoa was allocated to New Zealand, while German occupied islands in the Pacific Ocean south of equator were allocated to Australia. German concessions in Shandong, China was transferred to Japan who also got German occupied islands in the Pacific north of equator.
Trading of military machinery – Germany was prohibited from the manufacture or stockpile of armoured cars, battle tanks, military aircrafts, naval vessels, chemical weapon etc. Limits were imposed on the type and quantity of weapons and arms trading.
Reparation implications – An Allied “Reparation Commission” would be established to determine the amount which Germany would pay – it would submit its conclusions by 1st May 1921 after hearing the German Government’s stand. Interim reparation fixed at 20 billion gold marks ($5 billion) in gold, commodities, ships, securities, and other assets.
On 24th April 1921 German Government wrote to USA Government expressing readiness to accept total liability of 50 billion gold marks as reparation. The London Schedule of Payments of 5th May 1921 established final reparation sum of 132 billion gold marks to be paid by all Central Powers combined. The Commission, however, recognized that the Central Powers were not in a position to pay except Germany. Reparation amount was divided into three series of bonds: “A”, “B”, and “C” Bonds. “A” and “B” together had a nominal valuation of 50 billion gold marks (US$12.5 billion) which must be paid by Germany (out of which 9 billion gold marks payments were made between 1919 and May 1921). Reparation against “C” Bonds (82 billion gold marks) may/may not be required to be paid depending on Allied Powers decision in future.
The USA provided UK and France with loans amounting to USD 8.8 billon, when it formally entered WW-I. The total sum of war debt owed to the USA was USD 11 billion (including the loan given between 1919 and 1921) – essentially the UK and France governments wanted Germany to pay the reparations equivalent to their total loans accumulated during the course of WW-I.
3.2.2 Implementation of Reparation Payments
The flight of German capital abroad as a result of reparation payments and lower tax collection resulted in massive state deficit. To overcome that German government printed and dumped German marks without backing of gold/silver/forex. As a result, 1922 to 1924 German currency collapsed on hyperinflation (in 1923, inflation rate reached 578512%, 1 USD was worth 4.2 trillion Deutsch marks). Germany was unable to pay reparations.
During March to December 1923, Dawes Plan was formulated for which John Foster Dulles (legal advisor to USA President Woodrow Wilson), Montague Norman (Head of Bank of England), Charles G. Dawes (Director of one of J.P. Morgan banks), collaborated with Hjalmar Schacht (Dresdner Bank official). Dawes Plan transformed the existing Reichsbank as an institution independent of the Reich government (at least 50% of ruling body non-German) with Schacht as the director of Reichbank. Dawes Plan also introduced Reichsmark on 30th August 1924 replacing the old German mark and the hyperinflation was brought under control. In April 1924 the Dawes Plan formally replaced the “C” Bonds (82 billion gold marks) omitted. In 1st year following the implementation of new plan, Germany would have to pay 1 billion marks. Increasing gradually that figure would become 2.5 billion marks per year by 5th year of the plan. A Reparations Agency was established to coordinate the payments. A loan of 800 million marks would be arranged to back the German currency and economy – over 50% from USA based banks, 25% from UK based banks, and the balance from other European countries.
On 16th September 1928, a joint Allied-German statement was published acknowledging the necessity of a new reparation plan. The Young Plan (formulated by Owen D Young, American industrialist and trustee of Rockefeller Foundation) presented in June 1929 established the final reparation requirements at 112 billion gold marks (US$26.35 billion) with a new schedule of payments that would see final instalment of payment by 1988. In addition, Young Plan shifted the responsibility of coordination of reparation payments to Bank for International Settlements (which was established to coordinate among central banks and to receive and disburse reparation payments). A new loan of 1200 million marks would be raised by USA, UK, France and other European banks to back the German currency and economy.
With the financial crisis in German economy in 1931, USA President Herbert Hoover publicly proposed in June 1931 a one-year moratorium to reparation and war debts. Reparations were suspended for a year. On 16 June 1932 the Lausanne Conference opened, which annulled the Young Plan and instead required Germany to pay a final, single instalment of 3 billion marks. Thus Between 1919 and 1932, Germany paid less than 21 billion marks in reparations.
The relationship between Nazi government and the Zionist-Capitalist Deep State was so good that Reichsbank head Schacht travelled to the U.S. in May 1933 to meet major Wall Street bankers. As a result, USA-based banks provided Germany with new loans totalling USD 1 billion. After that, in 1933 new German Chancellor Adolf Hitler cancelled all payments, but neither Britain nor France forced German government to pay up. In June 1953, London Agreement on German External Debts resulted in agreement to pay 50% of the loan amounts that had been defaulted on in the 1920s and 1930s, but deferred some of the debt until German unification. In 1995, following reunification, Germany began making the final payments towards the loans. A final instalment of US$94 million was made on 3 October 2010, settling German loan debts in regard to WW-I reparations.
It will not be out of place to recall the views on ‘burden of WW-I reparation on Germany’ from three outstanding historians: AJP Taylor in his The Origins of the Second World War stated that in 1919 “many people believed that the payment of reparations would reduce Germany to a state of Asiatic poverty”, and that Keynes “held this view, as did all Germans; and probably many Frenchmen”. However, he also says these “apprehensions of Keynes and the Germans were grotesquely exaggerated”; Hans Mommsen & Elborg Foster wrote in their book The Rise and Fall of Weimar Democracy, “Germany financed its reparation payments to Western creditor nations with American loans”, which the British and French powers then used to “cover their long-term interest obligations and to retire their wartime debts with the United States”. Apparently what the authors wanted to convey between the lines was: as a direct fallout of the Treaty of Versailles, the Zionist-Capitalist banking elites of USA, UK, France and other European countries established total control in 1920s over Germany’s economy including monetary system through loans, and forced equity purchase as reparations.
3.2.3 Zionist-Capitalist Involvement in Economy of Germany
With the support of large bank loans from New York and London economic prosperity returned during 1924 to 1929 period. During this period exports doubled, and by 1929 GDP per capita was about 12 per cent higher than in 1913. However, even before the financial crisis of 1931, unemployment was more than 2 million by the end of 1928.
Germany made payments for both reparations and loans with shares of German companies – that allowed USA-based and UK-based capital to integrate itself into the German economy. The total foreign investment in German industry during 1924 to 1929 period amounted to nearly 63 billion gold marks – repay of loans accounted for 30 billion gold marks, and reparations accounted for 10 billion gold marks. JP Morgan provided majority of the investments. By 1930, German industry (majority owned by USA’s financial and industrial oligarchy) was second ranking in the world:
- German military industry company IG Farben was under control of Rockefeller’s Standard Oil
- German radio and electrical industry companies AEG and Siemens had General Electric as large investor around 30% stake, JP Morgan controlled General Electric
- 40% of Germany’s telephone network was controlled by ITT, JP Morgan controlled ITT
- 30% of Germany’s aircraft manufacturer Focke-Wulf was controlled by JP Morgan
- Germany’s automotive industry company Volkswagen was owned 100% by Henry Ford, while Opel was taken over by the DuPont family’s General Motors.
- In Germany metallurgical monopoly was established by Rockefeller bank, Dillon Reed and Co in 1926 – Vereinigte Stahlwerke (Unified Steel Trust) of Thyssen, Flick, Wolf etc.
- By 1933, USA capital entered major banks like Deutsche Bank, Dresdner Bank etc.; in 1936 New York branch of Schroeder’s bank merged with a Rockefeller holding to create investment bank Schroeder, Rockefeller & Co.
After Hitler seized power as the Chancellor, 1933 onwards, the economy continued to develop. Like the previous government, Hitler also viewed foreign credit as source of financing his four-year plans. Government mixed pro-people measures (as subsidies) with corporatocracy. UK and Germany signed the Anglo-German Transfer Agreement in 1934 which enabled Germany to become UK’s primary trading partner. Nazi party allotted maximum predominance to Germany’s military industry. During the WW-II German economy was buttressed exploitation of conquered territories and society. Real GDP grew by more than 50% between 1933 and 1937. Spending on military machinery between 1933 and 1939 increased tenfold (from 1.9 billion to 18.41 billion marks) and, growth as a percentage of the annual budget from 24% to 58%. Industrial production increased substantially until 1945 (due to production of military armament) when WW-II ended.
Rockefeller oil giant Standard Oil constructed large oil refineries in Germany that supplied the Nazi war machinery with oil. For the military and aerospace sector also American MNCs like Douglas, Pratt and Whitney tied up with German companies to build aeroplane factories. By 1941, when the WW-II was in full-swing, direct USA investment in the German economy crossed more than USD 0.5 billion (Standard Oil – USD 120 million, General Motors – USD 35 million, ITT – USD 30 million).
3.2.4 Zionist-Capitalist Involvement in Politics of Germany
Weimar Constitution stipulated that Reichstag elections would be held every two years. Such impractical postulation resulted in 9 Reichstag elections over the course of 14 years (1919-1933) and 14 different persons served as chancellor. As a result of the absurdity when Hitler appeared and Nazi party renounced the ‘circus show’ general population welcomed them enthusiastically. The significant points about the rise of Nazi party and Hitler are noted below:
- NSDAP (Nazi party) was based on racist imperialist anti-communist philosophy from its birth. Adolf Hitler announced Nazi party’s program on 24th February 1920 which included clause like:
- We demand the union of all Germans in a Great Germany on the basis of the principle of self-determination of all peoples
- We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germaine shall be abrogated
- We demand land and territory (colonies) for the maintenance of our people and the settlement of our surplus population (i.e. Lebensraum – living space)
- Only those who are our fellow countrymen can become citizens. Only those who have German blood, regardless of creed, can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew can be countryman
- On behalf of USA secret services, US Military Attaché in Germany Captain Truman-Smith explored potential recruits among German politicians who would work to further the interests of Zionist-Capitalist Deep State – retired General Ludendorff, Crown Prince Ruprecht, and Adolf Hitler. On 20th November 1922, the captain met with the future Fuhrer in his apartment. Hitler was quite candid with the American. After returning from Berlin, Truman-Smith submitted a report, which the embassy sent to Washington on 25th November 1922. Hitler, the Nazi leader invited Truman-Smith, the USA diplomat to his next rally. Instead of going there, Truman-Smith sent his friend (another secret service officer) Ernst Hanfstaengl. Ernst Hanfstaengl had dual German-USA citizenship (born in Bavaria, Germany and graduated from Harvard University along with FD Roosevelt as his classmate-cum-friend in 1909). Two meters tall Ernst was called as “Putzi” by Nazis. Ernst Hanfstaengl Putzi was truly the friend-philosopher-guide for Hitler, he was the puppet master behind the scene:
- Hanfstaengl, introduced Hitler, the rustic corporal to Munich’s elite society, taught Hitler the manners prevalent in high society and gave Hitler respectability. Putzi’s family did the most important task of image-making for Hitler.
- The Hanfstaengl family was rich. In March 1923, Hanfstaengl gave Hitler a loan of USD 1,000, which was a huge amount those days.
- In his memoirs, Hanfstaengl states the ideas he embedded into Hitler’s mind: “If there’s another war, whoever has America on their side will win. The only sensible policy that you should follow is friendship with the United States. If they Americans end up on your enemy’s side, you will lose any war…”. During 1923, Hanfstaengl held a series of geopolitical discussions with Hitler to shape his ideas in detail and expanding his horizons – “In many ways, Hitler was still malleable and obedient,” Hanfstaengl wrote. In 1924, “the obedient student” wrote his own book, repeating the thesis of his friend, the USA secret service agent.
- Hitler was a gifted orator. Ernst Hanfstaengl added confidence and enhanced effectiveness of Hitler’s communication skills.
- Responding to Hitler question: “how can I get through to the German people, without the press? The newspapers totally ignore me. How can build on my success as an orator with our pitiful Volkischer Beobachter (Nazi newspaper), which comes out with my speeches only once a week? We will not achieve anything until it prints daily.” Ernst Hanfstaengl provided a loan of USD 1,000. With the money Nazi party bought a new printing machine for their newspaper, the Volkischer Beobachter. Putzi pulled cartoonist Schwartzer to make the newspaper attractive.
- Hitler ‘appointed’ Putzi as the foreign press secretary of the party. Furthermore, Putzi also headed the foreign press division in Hitler’s deputy’s office. He was the single most important interlocutor between the German national oligarchy and zionist-capitalist oligarchy based out of USA-UK-France-Italy.
- The Beer Hall Putsch or Munich Putsch was a failed coup d’état by Nazi Party led by Hitler – he tried to seize power in Munich along with Hess and Hanfstaengl, Bavaria on 8th and 9th November 1923 using about 2000 Nazis marching to the Feldherrnhalle, in city centre. Police confronted, and a wounded Hitler escaped to Hanfstaengl’s house in Uffing about 60 km from Munich. After 2 days, he was arrested and charged with treason. The putsch brought Hitler to the attention of the German nation through front-page headlines in newspapers. Hitler was found guilty of treason and sentenced to 5 years in prison. In prison he dictated Mein Kampf to his fellow prisoner Hess – in it he extolled the benefits of an Anglo-German alliance (UK and USA being the principal countries of Anglo block). The manuscript of Hitler’s book was secretly taken out of prison. Hitler was released only after 13 months in prison (12th November 1923 to 20th December 1924). The zionist-capitalist oligarchy of Anglo block used their clout to release Hitler so quickly. He came to Hanfstaengl’s new house across the Isar river after leaving prison.
- NSDAP (Nazi party) was based on racist imperialist anti-communist philosophy from its birth. Adolf Hitler announced Nazi party’s program on 24th February 1920 which included clause like:
Hitler’s book – Mein Kampf (My Struggle) – was unable to get wide audience. The first edition sold 10,000 copies in 1925, and about 7,000 were sold in 1926. In 1927, first and second editions combined found only 5,607 buyers, and in 1928, only 3,015 buyers took it. But even without any other income, by the summer of 1925, he bought a villa in the Bavarian Alps (future Obersalzberg) and six-seater Mercedes Kompressor car. Hitler’s lifestyle changed – upmarket clothes, a car and chauffer. Responding to the Weimar tax inspectors, Hitler said “neither in 1924, nor in the first quarter of 1925 did I receive any income. My living expenses are covered by loans” – it happened 100 years back, as it happens now – a ‘leader’ selected by zionist-capitalist Anglo oligarchy has multiple avenues of income that a commoner won’t have!
- In the summer of 1932, Winston Churchill came to Germany on a personal visit. As written in Winston Churchill’s memoirs: “In the hotel, Regina, a gentleman introduced himself to someone in my entourage. His surname was Hanfstaengl and he spoke at length about the Fuhrer, with whom he was apparently very close… In all likelihood, he was assigned to make contact with me and clearly tried to make a good impression… As it turned out, he was Fuhrer’s closest confidante. He told me I should meet Hitler …”
Hanfstaengl’s side of the story reads differently: “I spent a good deal of time in the company of his son Randolph (son of Churchill) over the course of our pre-election trips. I even arranged for him to fly with us one or two times. He brought to my attention that his father would soon arrive in Germany and that we should organize a meeting”.
American secret services wanted a face-to-face meeting between would-be Chancellor of Germany and would-be Prime Minister of UK so that a personal equation grow between them – in spite of Hanfstaengl’s persuasions Hitler didn’t go to the meeting with Churchill. Churchill lamented in his memoirs: “Thus, Hitler missed his only opportunity to meet me”. However, Churchill discussed very sensitive geopolitical subjects with Hanfstaengl during that meeting. Hanfstaengl’s memoirs mention: “Churchill asked, ‘say, what your boss thinks about an alliance between France, England and your country?”
In February 1934 Hanfstaengl left Germany without the Fuhrer’s consent and went to Italy to meet with Benito Mussolini to initiate rapprochement between the two dictators. Putzi told Mussolini, “Such difficulties can exist between our two Fascist states.” History shows that the relationship between Hitler and Mussolini was on upswing from this point onward. Hanfstaengl time and again proved that he was the boss and Hitler-Mussolini were being groomed to carry out some strategic mission in near future – to destroy Soviet Union and communism.
- The Nazi Party became largest party in parliament, but it didn’t get absolute majority. It received 33.1% of vote in November 1932, 37.4% of vote in July 1932, and 18.3% of vote in March 1930. Vote share of Social Democratic Party dropped from 37.9% in 1919 to 18.3% by 1933, while vote share of German Democratic Party dropped from 18.6% in 1919 to 0.8% by 1933.
- On 4th January 1932, at a meeting between Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, German Chancellor Franz von Papen, Bank of England Governor Montague Norman, and USA politician John Foster Dulles a secret agreement was reached on funding for the Nazi Party. On 14th January 1933 Hitler held a meeting with Franz von Papen and Kurt von Schroeder, a Nazi-oriented banker during which Nazi party’s programme was fully endorsed. Even if Hitler was unable to win elections, he was sworn in as chancellor on 30th January 1933. Such move by the President Paul Hindenburg could be possible because the oligarchy modified the procedure of appointment of chancellor in March 1930 – instead of the leader of the parliamentary majority becoming the chancellor, the post would be appointed by the country’s president (article 48 of Weimar constitution). So President Hindenburg could appoint any German citizen as chancellor irrespective of result of the parliamentary election.
- Reichstag fire was an arson attack on the German parliament (Reichstag) building in Berlin on 27th February 1933, four weeks after Adolf Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor of Germany. Hitler’s government stated that Marinus van der Lubbe, a Dutch communist was the culprit – German court gave verdict that Lubbe had acted alone. After that incident, Reichstag Fire Decree was passed – Nazi Party used the fire as a pretext to come down heavily on the German Communist party that was completely against the Nazi party. Historians later concluded based on evidence, that the arson had been planned and executed by the Nazis as a false flag operation. In 2008, Germany posthumously pardoned Lubbe under a law to lift unjust verdicts dating from the Nazi period.
- The Nazi Party became largest party in parliament, but it didn’t get absolute majority. It received 33.1% of vote in November 1932, 37.4% of vote in July 1932, and 18.3% of vote in March 1930. Vote share of Social Democratic Party dropped from 37.9% in 1919 to 18.3% by 1933, while vote share of German Democratic Party dropped from 18.6% in 1919 to 0.8% by 1933.
Following the Reichstag fire, the Nazis suspended civil liberties and the Communists were excluded from the Reichstag. At the March 1933 elections, no single party secured a majority. Hitler tabled the Enabling Act on 24th March 1933 which gave him the freedom to act without parliamentary consent and without constitutional limitations. With Nazi paramilitary encircling the building, Hitler forced the Centre Party and Conservatives to vote for the Act while only the Social Democrats voted against (the Communists were excluded). The Act allowed Hitler to rule by emergency decree for next 4 years, though Hindenburg remained President.
Hitler immediately abolished the powers of the states and on 14th July 1933 outlawed all non-Nazi political parties and trade unions. The Act did not infringe upon the powers of the President, and after the death of Hindenburg in August 1934, Hitler usurped the Presidency by appointing himself President. German military took an oath on the day of Hindenburg’s death, swearing “unconditional obedience” to Hitler personally, not to the office or to the nation.
3.3 Onset of WW-II:
The revival and rearming of the German and Italian military forces between 1933 and 1939 occurred with the prior knowledge and continuous financial and technological support of the-then zionist-capitalist oligarchic elites of Anglo block countries especially UK and USA. The goal of this policy was to create a colossal war machine in the guise of Fascist Germany and Fascist Italy in order to strike a deadly blow to the Soviet Union (the resurgent new ‘edition’ of the ancient Rus Slavic civilisation).
3.3.1 Rebuilding German empire
Following Adolf Hitler’s consolidation of state power as a dictator in a single party rule, 1934 onwards Hitler went on a steady military build-up and empire building in Europe in order to create a communist-free German empire that will include most of the Europe and expand into East direction to create a Lebensraum i.e. living space for the racially superior ‘German race’ after decimating local population like Poles, Russians, Jews, Gypsyes, Serbs, Czechs etc. who collectively were termed as the so-called non-Aryan Untermenschen i.e. sub-human creatures (these policies were part of 25-point programme of Nazi party declared in 1920, as well as part of Mein Kampf book published by Hitler in 1925):
220.127.116.11 Hitler’s first major foreign-policy agreement was with Poland – on 26th January 1934 ‘Polish-German Non-Aggression Pact’ was signed for 10 years
18.104.22.168 In June 1935, ‘Anglo-German Naval Agreement’ was signed in London that allowed Germany to build naval power including submarines, beyond the limits set by the Treaty of Versailles signed after WW-I
22.214.171.124 In September 1935 Nazi Germany adopted the ‘Nuremberg Laws’, which revealed the racist philosophy of the Nazi party. According to the “Reich Citizenship Law” citizenship could only be held by a person possessing “German or related blood, who proves by his conduct that he is willing and fit faithfully to serve the German people and Reich.”
126.96.36.199 On 7th March 1936, Hitler sent troops into Rhineland which was a demilitarized buffer zone between Germany and France as per the Treaty of Versailles signed after WW-I
188.8.131.52 In 1936, Nazi Germany signed pacts with Militarist Japan and Fascist Italy to create an anti-communist platform as well as friendly cooperation among themselves
184.108.40.206 Fascist military insurrection against the Spanish government began on 17th July 1936 in Spanish Morocco and in Canary Islands. Within two weeks, two German military squadrons arrived in Spain, and German transport planes brought Moroccan troops into mainland Spain. Nazi Germany continuously sent military supplies, carried out bombing raids, and assisted the Fascist forces of General Franco in Spanish Civil War till Franco’s win in April 1939. It can be safely assumed that the same zionist-capitalist oligarchy from Anglo imperialist countries extended generous help to Franco through Hitler.
220.127.116.11 Nazi Germany forced Austria to sign ‘Austro-German Agreement’ on July 11, 1936 that guaranteed mutual non-interference in each other’s internal affairs plus independence of Austria as “a German State.” Being served ultimatum on 11th March 1938, Austrian chancellor von Schuschnigg announced his resignation. On 12th March 1938, German troops entered Austria – Germany annexed Austria [practically, WW-II started with it]
18.104.22.168 In the first conference about Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland (where ethnic Germans were numerically much larger than the Czechs) was held in London in April 1938 – British and French statesmen opined that a clash with Germany be avoided at all costs. On 30th September 1938, ‘Munich agreement’ was signed between Germany, Italy, UK, and France represented by Hitler, Mussolini, Chamberlain, and Daladier to transfer Sudetenland to Germany – the Czechoslovak representatives were not even invited to this meeting! On 1st October 1938, German troops entered Czechoslovakia. By mid-March 1939 Czechia was annexed by Germany. Slovakia announced its independence and withdrew from the country. Hitler allowed Hungary to annex 12000 sq. km of southern Slovakia and a small region of Sub-Carpathian Ruthenia on 2nd November 1938. Hitler also allowed Poland to get a small region of Těšín of Czechia. Instead of taking military or diplomatic measures against Hitler, Bank of England transferred Czech gold reserves worth six million pounds stored in London to Nazi Germany.
22.214.171.124 In October 1938, German Foreign Minister Joachim Ribbentrop demanded that, in lieu of renewal of Poland-German non-aggression pact (signed in January 1934), city of Danzig (now called Gdansk) would be occupied by Germany, and Danzig corridor (to connect Germany proper with East Prussia by a motorway and a railway through Polish land) would be constructed by Germany. As a normal reaction, Poland refused. Hitler rescinded the Polish-German Non-Aggression Pact (and Anglo-German Naval Agreement) unilaterally on 28th April 1939 in the Reichstag, with Germany renewing territorial claims in Poland
126.96.36.199 In April 1939, Nazi German forces seized the Memel district from Lithuania
3.3.2 Policy of Appeasement
1934 Onwards, the period when Hitler went on a steady military build-up in Europe, UK (world’s foremost colonial empire) Prime Ministers Neville Chamberlain and Ramsay MacDonald as well as French (world’s second largest colonial empire) leader Edouard Daladier followed a compromising policy towards Nazi Germany – this was called in history as the ‘policy of appeasement’ (with German Nazi government). Soviet People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs, Maxim Litvinov, who led foreign policy initiatives since 1934 (centred on concept of ‘collective security’ among all big European powers), commented on such policy of appeasement “England and France are now unlikely to retreat from the policy they have set out for them-selves, which boils down to unilateral satisfaction of the demands of all three aggressors – Germany, Italy and Japan. They will present their claims in turn, and England and France will make them one concession after another. I believe, however, that they will reach a point where the people of England and France will have to stop them. Then, probably, we will…return to the old path of collective security, because there are no other ways for preserving peace“.
Stalin gave a speech that was broadcast on Soviet Union television on 10th March 1939, in which he not only identified the policy of appeasement, but, he also outlined the objectives of such policy:
“The war is being waged by aggressor nations, which in every way infringe upon the interests of non-aggressor states, primarily England, France, and the United States, and the latter withdraw and retreat, making concession after concession to the aggressors. Thus, we are witnessing a blatant carving up of the world and its spheres of influence, at the expense of the non-aggressor states, without any attempt at resistance, and with even a bit of their acquiescence. It is hard to believe, but it is so. …. The policy of non-intervention betrays a desire not to impede the aggressors in their shameful deeds, not to obstruct, for example, Japan’s involvement in its war with China, and even better – with the Soviet Union, and not to deter Germany, for example, from getting caught up in events in Europe or from getting involved in a war with the Soviet Union. A motive can be seen to allow all the participants in the hostilities to sink deeply into the quicksand of war, to surreptitiously urge them onward, to allow them to weaken and exhaust each other, and then, when their strength has been sufficiently sapped – to appear on the scene with fresh forces, to take a stand, ‘in the global interest’ naturally, and to dictate conditions to the crippled belligerents.”
Britain, France and Poland continued to sabotage the collective security talks proposed by Soviet Union. UK and France wouldn’t give any guarantees of attacking Germany in the West in case of war – on the contrary, the zionist-capitalist Anglo oligarchy was, in fact, in collusion with Nazi Germany. Poland was generally viewing Russia as a victim for its own colonial war (war between Russia and Poland after Russian Revolution over the Tsarist territory claims-counterclaims still were resonating with Polish leader Pilsudski) and Poland saw Germany as an ally for such an adventure. Poland would not agree to let the Red army engage Germans on Polish territory. Basically the USSR was offered nothing but would have to declare a war on Germany and wait till Germany is done with Poland and invades the USSR.
On March 18 1939, Litvinov again suggested convening a pan-European conference to be attended by Britain, France, Poland, Russia, Romania, and Turkey. During March and April 1939 Europe witnessed hectic parleys over possible tripartite alliance among UK-France-USSR as suggested by USSR through a documented proposal. In the UK Cabinet Committee on Foreign Policy on 24th April 1939, Neville Chamberlain opposed the Soviet proposition saying “The Soviet’s present proposal was one for a definite military alliance between England, France and Russia; It could not be pretended that such an alliance was necessary in order that the smaller countries of Eastern Europe should be furnished with munitions… Then there was the problem of Poland.” (Who oppose any agreement with USSR based on which USSR participate in fighting against Nazi Germany within Poland boundary). Communist USSR’s Joseph Stalin removed Maxim Litvinov and installed Vyacheslav Molotov thinking Molotov to be a dynamic negotiator. Molotov spent May and June 1939 to work out on the same tripartite alliance, but in vain.
In July 1939 Germany proposed a non-aggression pact to Molotov in which they suggested USSR can get control of most part of the former Tsar empire like:
- the western parts of Ukraine and Byelorussia following the Curzon line of demarcation discussed during closure of WW-I (both erstwhile Tsar empire provinces, part of which were taken by Poland between 1918 to 1922),
- Bessarabia (erstwhile Tsar empire province, part of which were taken by Romania),
- Karelia (part of erstwhile Tsar empire Dutchy of Finland),
- Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania in Baltic (erstwhile Tsar empire provinces, independent countries WW-I)
And as per the German proposal, rest of the East Europe will come under Nazi Germany sphere of influence either by direct annexation or formation of protectorate. Soviet leadership, after exasperating failure of 5 years of discussions on military pact with UK and France, and in the midst of a massive war since May 1939 with Japanese empire in Khalkhin Gol near Mongolian border, couldn’t miss ‘opportunity’ of getting few extra years (before Nazi assault). On 23rd August 1939 the German–Soviet nonaggression pact (Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact) was signed.
USSR regained control of western part of Ukraine and western part of Byelorussia in September 1939 from Poland, and Karelia region from Finland in November 1939. Then USSR moved into Baltic region and Bessarabia in June 1940. While discussing on the annexation by Soviet Union, on 4th October 1939 Britain’s Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax said in the House of Lords “… the Soviet government’s actions were to move the border essentially to the line recommended at the Versailles Conference by Lord Curzon… I only cite historical facts and believe they are indisputable.”
Hanfstaengl set the ball rolling with frantic pace of militarization in Germany, and then he left Germany in March 1937 before any (future) Nazi war crime could implicate him. Putzi went to USA and was appointed an advisor to his friend USA President FD Roosevelt (as an expert on Nazi Germany he was in a position to suggest best how to coordinate with his ex-student, Hitler)! Ernst Hanfstaengl was the pioneer of a future phenomenon whereby thousands of Nazi scientists, technocrats, businessmen, military officers, and government officials would become American citizens and job seekers through ‘Ratlines’.
3.4.1 Journey from Phony War to Operation Barbarossa
Hitler’s Germany was in the thick of action during the 1939 through 1941 opening war fronts one after another:
188.8.131.52 Nazi Germany invaded Poland on 1st September 1939, Warsaw resisted until 27th September before surrendering. As usual, neither UK nor France militarily intervened to support Poland.
184.108.40.206 On 3rd September 1939, UK and France declared war on the Third Reich which is called as ‘Phoney War’ in WW-II history. The Polish military mission who flew to London had to wait for a week to meet British Chief of the Imperial General Staff, General Edmund Ironside – General Ironside promised 10000 obsolete rifles (while German Battle Tanks and Fighter Planes were thrashing Poland). During the 8 months duration of Phoney War, only once there was a land operation when French troops invaded Germany’s Saar district for couple of days. British Navy tried to enforce a blockade against German goods transport, and during German attacks at sea Royal Navy carrier HMS Courageous was sunk. During the ‘Nuremberg Trials’, German General Alfred Jodl admitted: “… we did not suffer defeat as early as 1939 only because about 110 French and British divisions stationed in the west against 23 German divisions, during our war with Poland, remained absolutely idle.”
220.127.116.11 Nazi Germany struck again to occupy Denmark with a surprise attack that lasted less than 4 hours on 9th April 1940. Attacking Norway on the same day, German forces completed the Norway invasion on 10th June 1940
18.104.22.168 On 10 May 1940, eight months after Britain and France had declared Phoney War on Germany, German Wehrmacht launched Operation Fall Gelb and marched into Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands, and northern France marking the end of the Phoney War. By the evening of 10th May most of Luxembourg was occupied by German military. In Netherlands, the battle lasted from 10th May to 17th May, while in Belgium the battle raged on from 10th May to 28th May. In Belgium and northern France the fight was between German Wehrmacht and Allied forces in which France committed their best troops. Between 26th May and 4th June 1940 the defeated Allied soldiers were evacuated from Dunkirk harbour in northern France. German forces began Operation Fall Rot on 5th June 1940 to capture remaining part of France outflanking the Maginot Line. Paris was occupied on 14th June, on 22nd June 1940 armistice was signed by France and Germany.
22.214.171.124 Formal military alliance i.e. ‘Berlin Pact’ was signed by Germany-Italy-Japan in September 1940 (original Axis Power). Later on Hungary joined in November 1940, Romania joined in November 1940, Bulgaria joined in March 1941.
126.96.36.199 In April 1941 Nazi Germany launched an invasion of Yugoslavian regions and Greece (the original Balkan campaign launched by Fascist Italy in October 1940 didn’t achieve the objective, hence this new initiative). Yugoslavian regions and Greece were divided among the Axis Powers viz. Germany, Italy, Hungary, and Bulgaria.
188.8.131.52 When Nazi Wehrmacht launched ‘Operation Barbarossa’, the largest military operation in documented history of humankind on 22nd June 1941 (officially authorized by Adolf Hitler on 18 December 1940, but got delayed due to delay in finishing Balkan campign) across western border of USSR along a 2,900-kilometer war-front with more than 38 lakh military personnel from countries of Axis Powers, USSR could not sustain its resistance against the Nazi Wehrmacht. Since November 1941 when Nazi military was about 25 km away from Moscow, USSR fought back and launched ferocious counterattack on German military. From January 1943, after winning the Battle of Stalingrad, Red Army became more confident about defeating the so-called ‘unassailable’ Wehrmacht. However, it was the Battle of Kursk (largest tank battle in history) in July 1943 which completely turned the tide in favour of Soviet Red Army. Every passing day the Red Army became unconquerable force that decimated Nazi Wehrmacht single-handedly and liberated entire east Europe before capturing Berlin in May 1945.
As analysed by Mikhail Meltyukhov (Russian military historian working at the Russian Institute of Documents and Historical Records Research), during a period of two and half years (from 1 January 1939 to 22 June 1941) USSR increased their military strength assiduously that helped the final destruction of Nazi Germany:
- Battle Divisions increased from about 131 to 316 (140% increase)
- Military Personnel increased from 2,485,000 to 5,774,000 (132% increase)
- Battle Tanks increased from about 21,100 to 25,700 (22% increase)
- Aircrafts increased from about 7,700 to 18,700 (143% increase)
184.108.40.206 Following Adolf Hitler’s consolidation of state power in Germany, Lebensraum (Hitler announced Nazi party’s 25-point program on 24 February 1920 which included Nazi demand for new land and territory for the maintenance of German people and the settlement of surplus German population – known as Lebensraum i.e. living space) became an objective of Nazi party’s militarism and provided justification for the German territorial expansion into Eastern Europe. The Nazi Generalplan Ost policy (GPO) or ‘Master Plan for the East’ dealt with how Germany can set up a Lebensraum in Eastern Europe necessary for survival of so-called Aryan race (Nazis assumed Germans as ‘pure Aryan’ race) by eliminating most of the local non-Aryan population (Nazis assumed Slavs as non-Aryan and hence Untermenschen i.e. sub-human) like Poles, Russians, Jews, Czechs, Slovaks, Gypsyes etc. through mass killing, decimation by starvation and disease, and deportation to Siberia. The body responsible for the GPO was the SS’s Reich Main Security Office under Heinrich Himmler, which commissioned the work before World War II started. After the invasion of Poland, the original blueprint for GPO was discussed by the Reich Commissioner for the Consolidation of German Nationhood (RKFDV) in mid-1940. The next known version of GPO was procured by the RSHA from Erhard Wetzel in April 1942. The next revision was officially dated June 1942. The final settlement master plan for the East came in from the RKFDV on 29th October 1942. A document which enabled historians to accurately reconstruct the Generalplan Ost was a memorandum released on 27th April 1942, by Erhard Wetzel, director of the Nazi party Office of Racial Policy, entitled “Opinion and thoughts on the master plan for the East of the Reichsführer SS”.
Himmler stated openly: “It is a question of existence, thus it will be a racial struggle of pitiless severity, in the course of which 20 to 30 million Slavs and Jews will perish through military actions and crises of food supply. As of June 1941, the GPO policy envisaged the deportation of 31 million Slavs to Siberia. The Nazi government aimed at repopulating these lands with Germanic colonists in the name of Lebensraum after exterminating majority of the indigenous populations, to enable Germany to confiscate agricultural and mining products to transfer to Germany.
[Link: http://gplanost.x-berg.de/gplanost.html ]
After Stalingrad defeat and surrender by the legendary 6th Army of German Wehrmacht in February 1943, Generalplan Ost was suspended by Nazi party. However, German savagery with the civilian population of Slavs, Jews, and Gypsyes, from 1940 to 1945 still continue to shock the people across world.
3.4.2 Second Front of Allies
True to their deceptive and manipulative core nature, the leaders of UK and USA zionist-capitalist clique didn’t pay any attention to Stalin’s repeated request from 1941 to 1944 of opening a second front in the west against Nazi Germany which would help Soviet Union to get a respite from deadly Nazi onslaught. For the Anglo imperialists the WW-II plan was simple – Germany and Soviet Union should fight between them to finish each other, and then they would appear on the scene to occupy the vast Eurasian landmass and spread Freedom (to loot the natural resources) and Democracy (to install puppets over the illiterate and simple people).
On 28th April 1942, FD Roosevelt addressed to the USA: “These Russian forces have destroyed and are destroying more armed power of our enemies – troops, planes, tanks, and guns – than all the other United Nations put together.” Only when it became crystal clear that, in absence of a second front, Soviet Red Army would liberate the entire Europe on its own (thereby banishing any future influences of zionist-capitalist oligarchy on the government formation in whole of Europe), the Allies opened a second front in WW-II in June 1944 with the Allied landings in Normandy.
From all four key perspectives – mobilization, viciousness of struggle, loss of life, and loss of infrastructure – Eastern front was far more significant compared to Western front. In the opinion of Norman Davis: “German losses on the Eastern Front accounted for about 80 per cent of the total…”
At the end of the WW-II, Soviet Union had lost about 26.6 million people, Western Allies lost less than 2 million, Germany lost around 4 million troops in the Eastern front and 1 million on the Western front.
Also, from the military logistics point of view, Soviet Union could defeat the industrially and technologically superior Nazi Wehrmacht and invade Nazi Germany capital by May 1945 because:
- 21-month respite provided by the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact was utilised for increasing the production of military machinery on a gigantic scale
- Lend-Lease policy of the FD Roosevelt provided food-clothing-raw materials-rail engines-automobiles-petroleum products-ordnance goods and ammunitions etc. between 1 October 1941 to 2 September 1945 (1947 money value of which amounted to about USD 11 billion)
3.5 Aftermath of WW-II:
At the onset of WW-II in 1938, USSR consisted of the following regions/countries in European territory (naming convention as it exists now):
- Ukraine except Western Galician region
A complete and thorough assessment of WW-II casualties should be again undertaken by the group of CIS countries who were part of USSR 30 years back – every post-1945 citizen of this planet owe a bit to every known/unknown USSR citizen for their immense sacrifice to resist the Fascist forces during WW-II. I think, casualties were more than 30 million – military killed in action, soldiers missing in action, killed/died while POW, military death of wounds, civilian death on front, civilian death of forced labourers in Germany, civilian death in German prisons, civilian death of starvation, missing civilian, the list of category consists of all possible permutation-combination. Even if we accept government figure of 26.6 million dead plus wounded, it become 13.7% of 194 million population of USSR in 1940. Almost all physical infrastructures in Belarus, Ukraine, Crimean, and European regions of Russia were destroyed by indiscriminate bombing of Germany. Tragedy of such gigantic scale in any society would have been the cause of crushing defeat. But Communist Party of Soviet Union led by Stalin withstood such barbaric assaults only to rebound with more strength – economic, political, and military.
At the end of WW-II in 1945, USSR consisted of the following regions/countries in European territory:
- Ukraine including Western Galician region
- Moldova (Bessarabia)
Except during the initial 6 months of Operation Barbarossa, Stalin proved himself a leader who was in control of the complete situation even at the worst moment. The zionist-capitalist oligarchy based in imperialist Anglo and French countries and their lackeys in east Europe were outsmarted by Stalin at every round of the geopolitical game surrounding WW-II. Stalin was disliked so much among the zionist-capitalist oligarchy and aristocrats that, on the death of Joseph Stalin in March 1953 (under suspicious circumstances) the stark enemies like Winston Churchill sent no condolences, or send a sympathy card. Interestingly, only after Stalin’s demise, Churchill was found to be suitable candidate for Knighthood and Nobel Prize (in literature) in 1953.
By 1953 when Stalin died, USSR already changed beyond imagination. A country that had, 30 years back, one of the most oppressive society with extreme poverty, widespread illiteracy, very high mortality, and high concentration of wealth within aristocrats, got transformed into a society where ALL citizens had guaranteed food-education-healthcare-housing-employment-vacation facilities. Soviet Union was the second most powerful country in terms of scientific research, atomic research (second country to test atomic bomb), space research (first country to send space craft), military machinery, and industrial machinery. By then, 85 significant Soviet journals were being translated into English language by USA government funding. Within three decades, Stalin transformed the Soviet Union into a major world power struggling almost single-handedly against the Zionist-Capitalist powers and their monstrous Fascist offspring. Born to shoemaker and house cleaner, Stalin was a true anti-elitist plebeian revolutionary who even sacrificed his son during WW-II by refusing to exchange him (in German captivity) with German General (in Soviet captivity).
Let me clarify at the end that, this article doesn’t aim to paint a bright untainted image of Stalin. I would like to also take this opportunity to briefly explain why.
The 6th Congress of the RSDLP (Bolshevik) party in July-August of 1917 elected the Central Committee comprising of 21 leaders:
- Politburo members – Vladimir Lenin, Andrei Bubnov, Grigory Sokolnikov, Joseph Stalin, Lev Kamenev, Grigory Zinoviev, Leon Trotsky
- Secretariat members – Felix Dzerzhinsky, Matvei Muranov, Yakov Sverdlov
- Only Narrow Composition members – Vladimir Milyutin, Stepan Shahumyan, Moisei Uritsky
- Only members of CC but not part of above groups – Ivar Smilga, Fyodor Sergeyev, Alexei Rykov, Viktor Nogin, Nikolay Krestinsky, Alexandra Kollontai, Nikolai Bukharin, Jan Berzin
In 1940, only 3 of the top 21 leaders of Bolshevik party would be alive: Stalin, Matvei Muranov who was sent into retirement from political life, and Alexandra Kollontai who was sent on foreign diplomatic assignment away from internal politics and governance. A little workout reveals that 7 of the top 21 leaders (Stepan Shahumyan, Moisei Uritsky, Yakov Sverdlov, Fyodor Sergeyev, Vladimir Lenin, Viktor Nogin, and Felix Dzerzhinsky) died due to ailments, or accidents. In other words, the remaining 11 of the top 21 leaders perished during the period when Stalin consolidated his power within the Bolshevik party and USSR. Like many others, I couldn’t get convinced, how more than 50% of the Bolshevik Party leaders were traitors to the state and the party! That would also mean, as a corollary, that Lenin led Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 with less than half of the Bolshevik party central committee members as true patriots! Even considering and acknowledging the facts that:
- Trotsky and his team representing the interest of Zionist bankers based in Europe and USA tried to derail the economy and destroy the society across Soviet Union, and
- Marshall Tukhachevsky and his team of Generals tried to seize state power and thereafter surrender large tract of the then USSR to Fascist Germany to make peace with Germany,
There can’t be any doubt that, paranoid and autocratic behaviour of Stalin created an organisational disarray within the Bolshevik party which pushed more and more leaders against Stalin’s style of functioning, that again created even more distrust in Stalin, finally culminating in massive purge and repression (after murder of Kirov).
Keeping in view the stellar achievements and leaving aside the organisational mismanagement during the initial decades of formation of Soviet Union, let me remind the readers across the world who love truth-justice-equality-morality, Lenin and Stalin were among the most outstanding leaders of the toiling masses in the history of humankind, who never compromised with capitalism, imperialism, and Zionism (academicians caringly call the combination of these three virus as ‘world-system’ or ‘world order’).
The application of the Marxist theory of socialism, as carried out by CPSU under the leadership of Lenin and Stalin had significant drawbacks, which were resultant of the-then prevailing geopolitical conditions as well as the necessity of creating a ‘material basis’ for the socialist transformation of the society. Fundamental working principle of capitalism has not and will not change in future – whether it was mercantile version, agrarian version, industrial version, or more recent financial version, capitalism (coupled with Zionism and imperialism) will continue to seek accumulation of wealth by direct and indirect exploitation of 90% common people. Considering the maxim ‘failure is the pillar of success’, people across the world look forward to the current Marxist parties and leaders in Russia and other Eurasian regions for making the second and completely successful attempt to initiate a colossal movement that will sweep away the Zionist-Capitalist filth accumulated over past 6 decades in erstwhile USSR, to usher new era of Marxist economy and collective society where every citizen can breathe fresh air free from the polluted pungent smell of capital and profit. Inquisitive readers may look into details of such possibility in one of my previous articles, link of which is given below:
[Link: http://thesaker.is/towards-a-new-dawn-of-collective-community-in-a-new-union/ ]
Russian society would, thus vindicate the appearance of so many extraordinary personalities on its soil each of whom was a doyen in their own era, including great humanists like Tolstoy-Chekhov-Gorky and great leaders like Peter-Lenin-Stalin!
Note: The following books were referred:
Nikolay Starikov – Who Set Hitler Against Stalin
William Shirer – The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich
Joachim C. Fest – Hitler
By profession I’m an Engineer and Consultant, but my first love was and is History and Political Science. In retired life, I’m pursuing higher study in Economics.
I’m one of the few decade-old members of The Saker blog-site. Hope that this website will continue to focus on truth and justice in public life and will support the struggle of common people across the world.
An Indian by nationality, I believe in humanity.
Por más piruetas que se hagan no se puede llegar de Lenin a Stalin sin pasar por Trotsky. Y los hechos hablan por sí mismos: uno salvó la revolución y el otro exterminó a los bolcheviques.
Moderator Auto – Translate to English
No matter how many pirouettes are made, you cannot get from Lenin to Stalin without passing through Trotsky. And the facts speak for themselves: one saved the revolution and the other exterminated the Bolsheviks.
Someone should fire the exterminator, he failed, miserably, ask any Palestinian. Hmmmmm…….maybe a joke I missed.
Maybe he exterminated not the bolcheviks, but those non-russians bent on world domination?
You are not going to influence a western public by writing your own propaganda.
I haven’t manage to read this to the end, it’s actually quite disturbing because we good humans have none left to rely on.
Zion, Russia China, all same. It’s only the other side of the coin.
I’m numb of the effort to portrait China and Iran as the good guys. They both support the CONvid19 hysteria. And still some guys hate on USA and Israhell only, but newsflash guys – sociopaths in power are in every country. And mask wearing sheep right next to you, whereever you are – not only in amerikkka. So why hate only on the pindos? Sure they are exceptional ‘morans’ but the rest of the world ain’t no better.
Typical Anglo Saxon falsehoods, propaganda and lies spread by you two, the story that they are all the same and are part of the cabal, you are part of the same establishment you claim to stand against. The only question from you two is are you, unwitting dupes or paid Zionist corporate propagandist trolls.
This is a cliched Anglo-American psyops: the “They Are All the Same” meme.
The Anglo-Americans realize that, on an alternative Russian website like The Saker, overt support for the Anglo American Evil Empire and its crimes will not work.
So they do the next best thing: smear the nations (like China, Iran, or Russia) targeted by the Anglo American Empire as “being no different.”
This is a more sinister and devious form of American propaganda, which comes in a 1001 different political flavors and mutations in general.
And regarding COVID-19, if COVID-19 is merely hysteria, why has Russia just announced that it is close to producing a COVID-19 vaccine (aka the Sputnik Vaccine) to be exported around the world?
I suppose he will claim that Russia is “in on it” and also secretly part of the Anglo Zionist New World Order/Illuminati/Reptilian Shape-shifting Elite.
Well, to mainstream anglos, they _are_ all the same!
They even call each other communist.
Do coins have three sides (1:Zion 2: Russia 3: China)? And on which coin’s three sides does the Anglo-Americans anonymously lie, hororalbele Anonymous?
Let me summarize and spare you further suffering: It is everybody’s fault but Germany’s. Forget the countless anti-Russian crusades that have been going on for a millennium.
‘Really existing’ socialism was a weird and amazing force. Even if Lenin was an agent of Germany and the USSR was in debt to western banks, the western capitalists were terrified of it. Especially terrified that western workers would overthrow them, kill them, and, even worse, appropriate their property.
The flaw in Marxism at every stage of its development is that it believes in linear progress fueled by human reason. Faith in human reason is juvenile hubris, reason is usually the fig leaf with which we try to conceal our murkier motives from others and from ourselves.
I’m a broken record on this, but I think ‘apologists’ for Marx and anti-communists almost always overlook some key points on the matter:
– Human selfishness is not an obstacle to Marxism. The pre-Marx ‘Idealistic Socialist’ Proudhon wrote ‘the Philosophy of Poverty’ arguing that socialism would be built by appealing to people’s morality. Marx viciously attacked Proudhon in a book he titled, ‘the Poverty of Philosophy’. Marx thought the workers would overthrow the capitalists out of rational self-interest, to stop getting exploited.
– The Russian revolution was contrary to Marxist predictions. Marx believed that capitalism was the most dynamic force in history and could only collapse under its own weight. Then, revolution would break out in the most advanced capitalist economies, Germany+Benelux, because capitalism had already inadvertently organized the workers into ready regiments there. Marx hated Russia until his ideas took off there. He thought maybe Russia could leapfrog that stage, because of the tradition of the Russian peasant commune, if Russia was carried in in a revolutionary wave starting in Germany. That condition was clearly not met.
– Before the Bolshevik Putsch, the more dogmatic Marxist, Rosa Luxemburg, wrote to Lenin, the leader of the openly innovative non-dogmatically Marxist Bolsheviks that the Leninist innovations of ‘Democratic Centralism’ within a ‘Vanguard Party’ would lead to an unwieldy bureaucracy that would collapse under its own weight.
– Lenin was an international socialist, an ‘old bolshevik.’ When the western European socialist parties discredited themselves by voting for WWI war bonds and the 1918 german revolution was swiftly crushed, international socialism became a walking dead idea. the old Bolsheviks were purged and by the end of his life Lenin lost faith in socialism. The whole global movement became an instrument of Stalin’s red-empire ‘socialism in one country’ geopolitics.
– Leninism, i.e. democratic centralism in a vanguard party, is simply the idea that socialists need to form a war cabinet with indefinite martial law to have any chance against the imperialists. Leninism has been successfully applied by non-socialists in the Islamic Republic of Iran and in Taiwan under the KMT. Many or most things that the Soviet leadership did were not dogmatically Marxist, but rather followed this militarized logic. The British state and economy during WWII was run in a very similar way to the USSR. The recognition 15 ethnic soviet republics has nothing to do with Marxism, but is a concession that Stalin, as narkomnats, thought necessary to give to the other great competing -ism of the 19th and 20th centuries, nationalism.
– Much of the worst things the Soviet state did were done by Poles/Lithuanians or Caucasians – Dzherzhinsky, Yezhov, Stalin, Beria.
– Engels wrote in the definitive summary of Marxism that banning religion was ridiculous, but that it could be eradicated through education. If you read the whole ‘opium of the people’ quote, it’s actually a bit sympathetic toward religion. At least, it’s certainly not a gruff dismissal. Socialism started out in small Christian communities in the west.
– Marx’s writing is about 80% describing capitalism, 17% predicting how socialism would appear, and 3% prescribing how socialism should be formed. His ideas on alienation, commodity fetishism, and crisis theory, among others, are worth considering. Many of Marx and people like Gramsci’s criticisms of bourgeois culture are completely shared by the traditional far-right, especially the German Conservative revolutionaries.
– In my opinion the world needs something much like Marxism but without the messianical faith in science and reason, but it will only come out of the ashes of a global crisis. Orwell, a socialist in the vein of Luxemburg, thought that maybe, even in a socialist society, people may have a psychological need for a monarch. Personally, I’m politically Confucian, pro-Monarch minus aristocracy, and economically cooperativist-distributist, but that and 2 euros will get you a cup of coffee, as they say.
“let me remind the readers across the world who love truth-justice-equality-morality, Lenin and Stalin were among the most outstanding leaders of the toiling masses in the history of humankind, ”
How many millions of members of the toiling masses did they “lead” right into unmarked graves in the torture chambers and basements of the CheKa/NKVD, in the tundra? How is destruction of the Church “leading” the toiling masses? At least Stalin, to his credit, gave “11 of the top 21” Bolshevik leaders exactly what they deserved — a terminal does of their own medicine — and revived patriotism and the Church in the course of WWII, but Lenin was a total degenerate misanthrope without a single redeeming human quality.
Typo: “terminal dose”
Nothing compared to the millions of victims of capitalism…
What a Toure de Force from “Staightbate” here obove.
But I see a failing in the author’s writing about Trotzky:
Was Trotzky an agent of New York Yankee/Jewish banking interest or not?
Supporting or opposing either Wall Street or City of London — having worked in both spheres — or to sabotage those?
I Remember Breschniew lauding one US Jewish US milloíonere for his having had an education: “Without Your US pencils for writing , — I could not have graduated from primary school” , he said.
Russians remember the obligations involved in any friendship!
Is there any doubt that Trotsky was the agent of Kuhn, Loeb&Co, Schiff, Warburg?
To be honest, having read the entire submission by Straight-Bat I firmly believe the caption Greatest ‘sin’ of Lenin and Stalin would have made more sense had it been accompanied by a significantly shorter presentation with a clear emphasis upon Lenin and Stalin. As it stands, it has the appearance of an academic history book which gets lost in the super-abundance of recorded facts or, rather, narratives with Lenin and Stalin only marginally forming any part of them.
But Straight-Bat has nonetheless contributed something of appreciable substance. Out of the nine first comments, most of them neatly illustrate the proverb about ”casting pearls before swine”. Western mis-education never ceases to amaze — not to be confused by impress.
One should never “cast pearls before swine”:
Much advanced research carrried out in Washington D.C. and City of London, Buckingham Palace, Maro Lago and under the tolling of Big Ben has proven that “casting pearls before swine” results in pigs slipping and hurting themselves.
The expert conclusion is to return them to the pigsties and returning to the ancient method of spreading dried chaff and straw for their enjoyment to their hearts’ delights.
The only anima deserving to be “strewn pearls before” are those wonderfully agile Karelian jumping sheep (Karelisk springe-får)!
Thanks Straight Bat and Saker. Good solid information I found the bit about Herr Hanfstaengl particularly interesting.
However won’t be sending it to my Trotskyist friends like some of the commenters here you can’t please everyone!
My mums best friend married a GI during the war. Years later on a visit he told me he was entering a German Town sitting on the back of a tank. Passed a big factory which was totally untouched the surrounding workers dwellings were bombed flat. I was so angry I emptied my submachinegun at the windows as we passed.
”Lenin and Stalin were among the most outstanding leaders of the toiling masses in the history of humankind, who never compromised with capitalism, imperialism, and Zionism”
Agreed. What’s interesting is that in the Russophobic West, the drivel which we have come to know as trotskyism is readily accepted almost everywhere (except among clinically insane right-wingers): Lenin struggled for social emancipation whereas Stalin struggled for personal power and enslavement of the people. But the West has zero authority on the subject. Really, as long as Lenin and Stalin remain highly popular in contemporary Russia and the Trots and Anarchists stay as negligible as ever, the West can keep on blathering.
Let’s keep this simple. All wars are bankers’ wars.
The spoils of ‘world war II’ were divvied-up at Bretton Woods in July 1944 and a Russian delegation took part in the drafting of the agreement. Why not? The Russians had spilled their blood.
The atomic bombing of Japan in August 1945 was a display of force directed at Russia; a threat to which Stalin did not succumb. Stalin refused to ratify the Bretton Woods agreement in December 1945.
Stalin jammed the gears of the international bankers’ money printing machine with Russian monetary sovereignty and set-back the bankers’ plans for global domination very significantly. Today, the great mass of humanity is indebted to Stalin for his clear-sighted patriotism.
The ignoble sell-out of Russian sovereignty to the globalists’ was left to Gorbachev and Yeltsin.
Putin has been redressing the betrayal of the Russian people ever since his coming to power. As an agent of the secret services he knew what powers were stacked against him. Slowly, slowly catchy monkey. The imposition of a mineral extraction tax in 2001 was a first step and a giant leap in his pursuit of a sovereign ruble and a sovereign Russia, if that is indeed his goal. We’ll know soon enough.
The international bankers’ and their globalist ghouls have been blind-sided – there has been a military coup. The US military machine is now fighting for the US of A. Trump’s absorption of the FED into the Treasury in March 2020 is proof of the fact.
This is a green light for Putin to finish the job and for other nations to reclaim their sovereignty also. Too bad Gaddafi didn’t live to fulfill his noble ambitions for Libya and Africa. He was a serious impediment to the globalists’ ambitions.
Dorothy has pulled back the curtain on the Wizard of Oz. A golden age of world peace is within our grasp. This earth is the honey of all beings and all beings are the honey of this earth.
The New Humanity, will be characterised by international anarchy: sovereign states, each one with its own money printing machine acting in the best interest of is people. Bring it on Patriots!
When you used the word lakh ( 100,00), I figured you were Indian.
“As analysed by Mikhail Meltyukhov (Russian military historian working at the Russian Institute of Documents and Historical Records Research), during a period of two and half years (from 1 January 1939 to 22 June 1941) USSR increased their military strength assiduously that helped the final destruction of Nazi Germany”
Is there a group of young Russian “revisionist” historians plowing through the historical records and collecting hidden memoirs of the period discussed?
Stalin was no fool but he was equally destructive in his actions. Just as it was not the “Jewish upper leadership of the Bolsheviks” that made the revolution, but rather it was the rank and file and the middle organizational types i.e. the ones that actually make things happen practically, but who get little glory. What about the purge of the Generals? pre Operation Barbarossa.
Sometime I would see a person recover from cancer after being devastated by the medical “treatment” and it was almost as if they recovered despite what was done to them in the name of the “fight against cancer”. More needs to be written from a Social History angle and not just from Diplomatic, Political or Great Man angle.
Trotsky was wrong about not suing for peace…Lenin was correct but Trotsky organized the Red Army which fought the Anglo-Zionists to a stand still. The truth is never simple.
This is surprisingly good history and done from a perspective not too common on this site. But you guys really need to “get over” Trotsky. Yeah, he was obnoxious, fixated on the need for world revolution, but he was not in the pay of the anglo-zionists any more than Lenin was.
Well, “teranam”, tera-nam also means “your name” in Hindi. So what? right? The author has previously stated in many articles he’s of Indian descent. What’s your insinuation?
Trotsky should be analysed. He was the first trojan horse in the 20th century to loosen up Russia. It will keep coming in all shapes and forms and those who forget the past are bound to repeat it.
A lot of this article correlates to Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, official historian of Cecil Rhode’s the Milner Round Table that orchestrated WWI to divide and conquer Germany and Russia, surprised they’re not mentioned anywhere in such a long article. Also surprised that there’s so little cross-pollination here with sites that focus on that stuff more like Corbett Report. Not so hard to find the names of these ‘zionist capitalists.’ I’d call them anglo high-oligarch supremacists, but whatever.
The argument could be made that all the analysis on this site could greatly benefit from more focus on how that vast cabal of supra-state actors operates.
I could add two points to my list above.
– In the midst of the deprivations of war, the February revolution, like the French revolution and the Tahrir square Egyptian ‘spring’, only happened when people could no longer afford bread. Not so much to do with moral courage. there’s a famous line, ‘we’re always 9 meals from social anarchy.’ Sure, socialist revolutionary fervor had been simmering across Europe for a while, it didn’t come out of nowhere.
– I noted that Marx hated Russia. As leader of the Holy Alliance, Russia had actively crushed liberal revolutions in Europe like Hungary 1848 to maintain autocracy. Marxism is just liberalism taken to its logical conclusion, the fundamentalist version. Liberalism is the belief that no-one, no monarch, is better than a slave owner, and no one has the authority to impose laws limiting how slave owners harrow their slaves. They couched their arguments in the veil of universal language, and many in the lower classes took the words at face value, demanding ‘equality for all,’ sparking the democracy movement. Since the liberal American & french revolutions, liberalism and democracy have been in bitter conflict, as you can’t be a slave owner (or wage slave owner) if everyone is equal before the law. Marx based just about all his ideas on the fundamentalist democrat thinkers from the french revolution. Fourier, Babeuf, Saint-Simon, Michelet, Enfantin, etc. This is not an endorsement.
Let’s actually get to know who exactly the ‘deep state zionist capitalists’ are, describing the world in terms of great power rivalry, with mainly state actors, the same way they would in 1812, isn’t going to be effective:
Russian interior minister predicts it all: http://www2.stetson.edu/~psteeves/classes/durnovo.html
Another book you – or anybody that is at all serious about this period – should find and read is “Special Tasks: The Memoirs of an Unwanted Witness – A Soviet Spymaster” by Pavel Sudoplatov
Among many other failings of the above article, the accusations against Tukachevsky are complete nonsense. But this one is a bit ridiculous.
“Trotsky and his team representing the interest of Zionist bankers based in Europe and USA tried to derail the economy and destroy the society across Soviet Union,”
After organizing the Red Army almost from scratch and leading it to victory in the civil war and the Polish invasion by Pilsudsky, he suddenly becomes a tool of western Zionist bankers – a bald assertion without a single shred of evidence or even justification. Give us a break.
“His team” by the way was known at the time as The Left Opposition. They were the first ones to propose a 5 year plan of rapid industrialization – a program that was ignored by the Troika until Stalin, panicked by the sowing strike organized by the Kulaks in 1928, reacted to the crisis in agriculture and the breakdown of the “Smitchka” – their name for the worker peasant alliance.
Recently the idea that the First World War was the result of the manipulations of a ‘secret society founded by Cecil Rhodes’ (of which Russian ministers were also part) and that Russia bore the ‘guilt of war’ and Germany was innocent victim of these machinations, took such a grip on any interpretation of the causes of the war, that the simple, stark facts that it was Austro-Hungary which started the war on 28 July 1914 after rejecting the solution of an International Conference in the spirit of the Hague Conventions (proposed by Edward Grey and Russians), and Germany which declared war on Russia on the 1st of August 1914 and invaded Luxembourg and Belgium the next day according to the Schlieffen Plan, which would attract immediately the activation of the Franco-Russian Treaty of Alliance of 1894, are left aside as irrelevant. The Treaty stipulated that the parties would come to each other help in case one of them was attacked by a third party. Germany was the attacker, France was under obligation to come to the help of Russia. Britain had warned repeatedly Germany that it wold not stay neutral if she attacked France, warnings not heeded by the Germans. Germany did not make the assumption that France and England would stay out of the war on Russia, she made the wrong assumption that it would beat France quickly and then turn with full forces against Russia. There was no duplicity from France. There is a mistake, Germany did not declare war on Russia on the 31st and France withdrawing troops from the frontier only to fool the Germans and then mobilizing on the 1st of August.
And an oversight is also that Germany actively encouraged the socialist and nationalist ‘revolutions’ in Russia and the Islamic revolution in the British Empire (and Russia). Who send Lenin to Russia?
Can you provide a link or suggest a publication? Thanks.
Lenin was a commited revolutionary that did not work. He was funded. As was Marx, funded by his rich uncle.
Lenins brother attempted assassination of Tsar Alexander III. Serious revolutionary family. Trotsky is blamed as face of Zionists and bankers but Lenin was on the same team.
Only Stalin, not Lenin, stopped genocide on ordinary non exceptional tribe members of Russian lands. That is a fact. More knowledgeable people than I can elucidate on it.
This reads as historical revisionism, which is fine. Contrast with Russian thinkers like Starilov who present similar revisionism but make there points with minimim waffle.
I appreciate the effort but the ideology shines through. Your presentation of the facts is naive and comes across as cheerleading. Consider Kruschev provided Nehru with detailed information on Indian communists, who wanted to throw India into chaos to assist a war/skrimish with Maoist China. Consider that Indian communists have proved incapable of leadership and havr shown loyalty to international globalists and identity politics rather loyalty to their country and showing good governance.
Just to note, national leadership and caring about the wealth and prosperity of the mass of people in said nation is an ancient concept far older than the propagandiat writers that wrote socialism.
A real exhausting collocation of the events of that period and the personalities of Lenin and Stalin.
Thank you comrade!
It has been exactly 24 hours that this article was published by The Saker – Lenin and Stalin and Russia in WW I and II is a ‘very old’ subject indeed. I didn’t expect to see so many interesting comments – i don’t have anything to say about the zionist-capitalist trolls who have done their ‘official duty’ to deny their masters’ activities or at best to confuse truth from lie.
I have picked up some comments that needs clarification from my side. I am responding in one post.
1) ” As it stands, it has the appearance of an academic history book which gets lost in the super-abundance of recorded facts or, rather, narratives with Lenin and Stalin only marginally forming any part of them. “
Frankly speaking, there may be good history books available in Russia and Eurasia about the detail ‘true history’ of WW I and II. But in Rest of the Asia, Europe, North America, Africa the academic history books simply avoid telling the truth as it really happened between 1914 through 1945 – because of the British-French imperialist influences on education system in these continents they parrot the masters voice. My endeavour to write this article was from this perspective – i would love to get a booklet written in English on WW I and II that describes WW I and II factually.
2) ” Just to note, national leadership and caring about the wealth and prosperity of the mass of people in said nation is an ancient concept far older than the propagandiat writers that wrote socialism. “
It is amazing to know that “socialism” is a propaganda book by some “writers”! Though it’s true that the concept of prosperity of “mass of people” is as old as civilization. All religious leaders fought for prosperity and maorality of their own community. All true political leaders also struggled for the masses, among which Lenin and Stalin were significant.
3) ” The flaw in Marxism at every stage of its development is that it believes in linear progress fueled by human reason. Faith in human reason is juvenile hubris, reason is usually the fig leaf with which we try to conceal our murkier motives from others and from ourselves. “
I am not a dedicated supporter of the view that “human reason” can always explore the good and the bad. Had that been the case, Hollywood movies on WW extolling the sacrifices of Brits and Yanks wouldn’t have smashing hits globally! However, why to identify Marxism with that ? Marxism didn’t fail in USSR and East Europe, the true leaders failed to identify and smash the fraudulent.ones.
4) ” The argument could be made that all the analysis on this site could greatly benefit from more focus on how that vast cabal of supra-state actors operates. “
Most important actors were identified in this article. However, such exhaustive list was not planned because the entire system is top-driven, and you can know who were/are they “owners of humanity” easily – the owning families of Bank of England and Federal Reserve.
5) ” Lenin was a commited revolutionary that did not work. He was funded. As was Marx, funded by his rich uncle. … Trotsky is blamed as face of Zionists and bankers but Lenin was on the same team. “
Very old broken record being played by the commenter. Since Trotsky had been identified with zionist-capitalist banking plutocracy of USA and UK, the trolls owned by same zionist-capitalist elites create the confusion among the discerning readers that even Marx, and Lenin were also funded by bankers. If i go to a Standard Chartered bank and take a loan to buy a laptop computer, should i become a fellow funded by zionist bankers ? Marx and Lenin were human beings who lived in the society and hence used banking facilities. That didn’t make them anymore agent of Rothschild/Morgan/Rockefeller than Hitler becoming an agent of Christ since he visited Church!
“Assuming that France and Britain would not join the conflict, on 31st July 1914 Germany (siding with Austro-Hungarian empire) declared war against Russia”
Russia started a secret mobilisation long before that. Mobilisations were irreversible.
Suggested reading “Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War.” by Gerry Docherty and Jim MacGregor
Germany was in a permanent semi-secret state of mobilization against France once the Schlieffen Plan was drawn. Germany’s aggressive intentions were actually no secret for anybody, theorized by respectable University Professors and made clear by an increase in armaments and troops at a time when Russia was proposing a limitation of armaments and a final general disarmament and solution of conflicts by international arbitrage. Germany intensified the growth of its armed forces after the defeat of Russia in the Russo-Japanese, seeing in her temporary weakness an opportunity to push ahead with its expansionist plans.
Doherty and MacGregor are ‘conspiracy theorists’.
Can you name a publication that contradicts Docherty and MacGregor’s thesis? We’d like to hear about it.
Trotsky was not a Bolshevist. He was a bloody good journalist and orator and could fill Red Square without a mike. His oratory crucially encouraged people to build the Red Army. Of course he was totally unrealistic when it came to politics or military matters. Or negotiations. He seems to me to too often appeal to people who share these inadequacies, with some notable exceptions ie the admirable Michael Hudson.
It is just as well Tukachevsky was off the scene before Hitler Invaded as after the Treaty of Rapollo he had made many mates in the Wehrmacht High Command.
GREAT ARTICLE !
Yes Stalin was a peoples man and knew who the internal enemies were.
WW2 involved the US-UK-EU oil bankers financing Hitler to be their running dog with the backup plan to sweep into Europe on the false guise of attacking him, but that only happened after he had got into trouble in Russia.
It suited the industrialists in Germany Japan Italy US UK etc to pursue a war for 3 years to generate profits from making military equipment but that was only the excuse for building up forces to later shield western Europe after Hitlers armies failed to deliver in Russia, and sort out Asia eco & political issues (as Japan came out of it a lot better than when they went in and that was the plan).
That financing and deal also got Germany out of debt for WW1. Hence also German WW2 reparations for damage were deferred and effectively cancelled in 1953 (this has been a source of Greece’s woes in recent times).
The game has not changed and this is why Putin & Russia must stand firm.
But Russia also needs try and work out a fair investment deal with the EU that allows them to get access to the resources they need. And sort out all these monetary issues that underlie much of the conflicts.
I do love the fact that this is a place where people from parallel universes can come together and trade stories about the alternate histories that occurred in the various timelines of the parallel universes.
The greatest sin of Lenin and Stalin, and the rest of the Communists – is being ‘international socialists’, not ‘national socialists’.. Had Stalin actually planned for defence and not the conquest of Europe, Russia would have been much greater than it is now.
Stalin did not plan for the conquest of Europe, neither pre-revolutionary Russia. Hitler did as the Imperial Germany did. This new push to absolve Germany of unnecessarily provoking all the turmoil that plagued the world for a century is sickening.
Since when is Rappallo a suburb of Geneva?
Where did you find Rappallo a Geneva suburb? Could you quote the sentence please?
A Tsunami of Verbalisms to make “one ” Simple point ; Talmudic “so called Jews”. All this Scheisse visited on Humanity started at the Foot of the Cross.
Dear Straight Bat,
I had the patience necessary necessary to read to the end. Till then I have forgotten the title and what the article is about. At the end I have been reminded again, only to think, well I could’ve read the title only and that would be enough already. OK, joking aside, you have written an interesting article, even if not that much of it is new to me.
My first criticism, if you know what you want to say and what your strongest arguments for it are, the War and Peace kind of article length is not really necessary. But OK.
My other remarks are regarding your impartiality. For example, If you say the French retreated 10 km from the frontier, and were ready to let the Russians fight alone, and the next moment you say they returned on the next day, after having tried to trick Germans into thinking the Russians are alone – you cannot have it both ways.
Likewise, you fail to see the fine but very important details in more than one occasion. You accuse the British PM for duplicity, him having said to the German Ambassador only that GB would not stay neutral if France was to be attacked, and nothing about Russia. Well, whether that was a duplicity, I do not know; the love of GB for Russia was as well known these days as it is today. But in reality, what he said was equivalent to ‘If you attack Russia, we ll not stay neutral” because there was no way the Germans could have got into a war with Russia with France staying neutral. Reason simple – after killing Russia, the Germans could do the same to France any time.
Germans hoped GB ll stay out, and after this PM statement, that was out of question. There were only two possibilities after that; Russia staying neutral lets the Central Powers butcher up Serbia, or an all out war begins.
There was a war party in Germany, in the General Staff. They had the cooperation of the Chancellor, who did not forward to German Kaiser the message of Lichnowsky about what the London said, until too late. That is why the war started; Willhelm would have never allowed it if he knew Britain was in.
When you talk about the past events, it is easy to fall into the trap of thinking someone has planned it all in advance. First, in real life there are always very many players, interest groups and you cannot anticipate the moves of them all. “Mensch denkt und Gott lenkt”- The man plans ad God steers, German saying.
Certainly, people plan and scheme, but this backfires quite oft – everyone in a conflict plans it all, the moment it begins, you can forget the plans, and at the end someone wins, but exactly like planned, never.
Finally, if you tell us what a great leader and a patriot Lenin was, why don’t you ever tell us he came to power helped with millions of German Marks in gold, being transported like a virus into Russia in a sealed railway wagon thru Germany? Why do not you tell us the internal borders between the Russians, that split up Russia 30 years ago are his work? Why don’t you pause for a second to think about the meaning of the number of 10-25 mil dead in his civil war you are mentioning? Russian peasant has just bought his land from the landowners, but here come the Bolshies, taking it away. Russia has been thrown decades back by the civil war, you talk about liberation from the oppression of the Tsarists. And lawlessness and slavery were the rules of the day – secret police catching people in the streets to send them to slave work at Belomorsk canal and elsewhere.
To defend the country, your second genius throws away 30 mil. lives in the war and God knows how many before the war. God forbid, my friend.. my grandmother, the war generation, used to say for someone stupid: ‘Let the Hitlers generals be so smart as he is’. Stalin was not stupid intellectually, but in the heart – and that is much worse and more destructive kind of stupidity. Wake up, my friend, wake up if you can.. Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Marx and bankier oligarchy are turds of exactly the same kind. Soullles, Godless materialsts, the lovers of reason without heart, worshippers of their arses only.
Dear Slobodan Cekic,
To begin with your first point, I must admit it that the subject was so vast that I couldn’t do justice to the title by not attributing all political/geopolitical activities (of the-then Soviet Russia) to Lenin and Stalin – one, the article would have got bulkier by another few thousand words, and two, I would have bombarded with exactly opposite indictment as to ‘why Lenin and Stalin need to be named in every act of Soviet Russia and Soviet Union knowing fully well that both were at the helm during the period in discussion’…
Spending more than a decade in the blogger-activist role, I know that any discerning reader (including you and me) wouldn’t have commented to this article which deals with past history (told and retold thousands of time) unless feathers get ruffled! It is precisely the REASON why I have taken up the ‘same old story’ – even after a century, the same old zionist imperialist story that has been in circulation. And, I suspect that, 500 years from now when someone like me would sit down to review WW I and II, he would exactly face the same situation what I’m facing – history written by the victors is a bunch of lies and damn lies.
You wrote: “My first criticism, if you know what you want to say and what your strongest arguments for it are, the War and Peace kind of article length is not really necessary. But OK”
WW I and II are not “War and Peace” kind of article – I have used minimum possible words, probably unjustifiably, to deal with the manipulations by the-then world order clique against Lenin and Stalin.
You wrote: “My other remarks are regarding your impartiality”
Well, I’m only impartial to facts and figures. GB enticed Kaiser to get into WW I by saying “if you attack France, we won’t stay neutral”. So Kaiser thought fighting with Russia won’t result in GB’s involvement. Your own statement proves that “Willhelm would have never allowed it if he knew Britain was in.”
Your statement: “people plan and scheme, but this backfires quite oft”
I can agree no more. This was visible in case of Soviet Russia after WW I and II was over – the zionist-capitalist plan for balkanisation of Russia and east European Slavic lands got trounced.
Your statement: “if you tell us what a great leader and a patriot Lenin was, why don’t you ever tell us he came to power helped with millions of German Marks in gold, being transported like a virus into Russia in a sealed railway wagon thru Germany? Why do not you tell us the internal borders between the Russians that split up Russia 30 years ago are his work? Why don’t you pause for a second to think about the meaning of the number of 10-25 mil dead in his civil war you are mentioning? Russian peasant has just bought his land from the landowners, but here come the Bolshies, taking it away. Russia has been thrown decades back by the civil war, you talk about liberation from the oppression of the Tsarists. And lawlessness and slavery were the rules of the day – secret police catching people in the streets to send them to slave work at Belomorsk canal and elsewhere.”
I must say, this is age-old broken record being played again. Undoubtedly Lenin had to organise on behalf of Bolsheviks (to counter Mensheviks, Constitutional Democratic Party, Socialist Revolutionary Party) and he collected cash from Germany, which he paid back through locomotive deal. But, it was Mensheviks (liberal Zionists of that era) who were the “chosen people” by the global Zionist oligarchy – on 15th March 1717 Tsar abdicated, and by 24th March all big powers recognised the government. Lenin’s Bolshevik government didn’t get recognition before he died!
Around 10 – 12 million dead in Russian civil war won’t be there, had the White Army generals not danced to the tune of imperialist puppet-masters in London-Paris-Rome-Washington. Every political turmoil in history resulted in huge number of casualties – except the triumph of liberal zionist-capitalist takeover of USSR. Liberal retards can beat their drum about it being “bloodless revolution”!
On internal borders of USSR, what Lenin did was division of the country for administrative purpose, to which Stalin added a layer of tribal/racial distribution. Even during Tsar, administrative divisions were maintained. Lenin didn’t do it in a wrong way, the revisionist CPSU led by zionist-capitalist clique “donated” USSR to the cause of Zionism and capitalism. Liberal and Conservative politicians of current Russia (democratic capitalists or social democrats like President Putin’s party) found Lenin an useful punching bag for all ills in Russia !
You speak about kulak’s land-holding, lawlessness and slavery during Stalin era … Who would speak on behalf of the serf and peasantry and workers in Russia ? Since they were at the bottom most layer of (informal) social hierarchy, they can be treated like pariah ? But they were 90% of the population! Marx-Lenin-Stalin stood for this vast silent majority – they never wanted to provide comfort to the oligarchy, wealthy aristocrats !
”To defend the country, your second genius throws away 30 mil. lives in the war and God knows how many before the war”
In the WW II what would Stalin do other than fighting the war and accept the losses? Hand over the Kremlin keys to Hitler? 21st century Russian liberals and democrats would like to do that, God forbid, if Anglo imperialists send troops across Russian border.
You wrote: ”Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Marx and bankier oligarchy are turds of exactly the same kind. Soullles, Godless materialsts”
“they are same godless creatures aligned with bankers” is already an old meme – it’s a zionist-capitalist psyop for global media. This article deals with those facts and figures that amply deny such story and put significant activities in right perspective.
At the end I must say, I enjoyed responding to your note.
Interesting piece. Still: In 1914 Sarajevo was not in Serbia. Later it was in the Kingdom of SHS, then in the kingdom of Yugoslavia, then in SFR Yugoslavia. Before the Ottoman rule it was under Croatian rule (be it royal or duchy), Bogomil rule (king Tvrtko). The origin of Serbian rule lies to the south and east of Sarajevo, Raijka and Zeta. I don’t understand this constant propaganda for the Serbian dream in this Vineyard. Do the Serbs need Lebensraum in the west?
Nothing compared to the millions of victims of capitalism…