by Eric Zuesse for The Saker Blog
The following 11-minute youtube video is a good introduction to this article:
Ukraine Crisis — What You’re Not Being Told
On July 20th, Moss Robeson headlined at TheGrayZone, “Influential DC-based Ukrainian think tank hosts neo-Nazi activist convicted for racist violence”, and he reported the inescapably visible tip of America’s iceberg of pro-nazi policies regarding Ukraine. Ukraine is a country which during World War II was torn between supporters of Hitler versus supporters of Stalin, and which became non-aligned after independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, but which U.S. President Barack Obama conquered in a brutal February 2014 coup (called by some “the most blatant coup in history”), which coup turned Ukraine’s Government into the world’s most-far-rightwing, and even sometimes overtly pro-Hitler, anti-Russian, nationalistic White-Power regime. It’s far more anti-Russian than anti-Jewish, but it is both. Obama did this so as to bring into NATO the country that has the longest European border (1,425 miles) with Russia, and which would thus be the best place from which to launch nuclear missiles against major Russian cities including Moscow. Ukraine as the main launching-pad for an invasion of Russia had been only a wet dream for NATO planners until Obama came into the White House, but even as early as June of 2013 Obama was already quietly advertising for bids on what then was a school in Crimea, in order to modify it to serve as part of his planned new U.S. naval base there replacing Russia’s biggest naval base, which Russian naval base has been there, in Crimea, ever since 1783. Russia’s leader, Vladimir Putin, enabled Crimea’s residents to block that part of Obama’s plan for Ukraine.
Adolf Hitler hated Slavs, including Russians, almost as much as he hated Jews; and, though Ukraine’s racist fascists — or ideological nazis — hate Russians even more than they hate Jews, America’s adoption of Ukraine’s nazis (racist fascists) and placing them into power, was a crucial turning-point in international affairs toward racist fascism. It is the authentic chief source of the hard-right turn, not only in the United States, but in many European countries. Until recently, nazism was far outside the mainstream, throughout the post-WW-II world. Clearly, now, that is no longer the case, and what Obama did to Ukraine is the main reason why (as will be explained here).
In post-coup Ukraine, children are being taught on the basis of the White-Power ideology, and, in the resisting regions — the regions that reject the coup — are mercilessly slaughtered (and the more graphic videos have been removed by youtube, and similarly for videos of adults being systematically murdered by Ukraine’s nazis). The post-coup Ukraine aims to get rid of its ethnic-Russian population.
Ukraine is the global beach-head for nazism, and even has two nazi Parties, one called “Right Sector,” and the other called “Freedom” (which got renamed that by the CIA from its original “Social Nationalist Party of Ukraine,” so as to be more acceptable to Americans and the EU). Both are even more anti-Russian than anti-Semitic.
The way America’s fake-‘progressive’, Democratic-Party billionaires-controlled, press, deals with the Democratic Party’s own “first Black President” Barack Obama (winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for his deceptive rhetoric) having done this — actually having stoked now racism throughout the world, targeted particularly against Russians — is to focus on the Democratic Party media’s distractionist theme of inter-ethnic, inter-religious, racist and other divisive American conflicts, as if this nazi problem’s overflowing now in Ukraine is not driven instead by geostrategic and imperialistic concerns in specifically U.S. policymaking, driven actually by America’s billionaires’ craving an all-encompassing global conquest, including conquest ultimately of Russia, which will be the last since it is the only other nuclear superpower. For example, the fake-‘progressive’ The Nation magazine, on 22 February 2019, headlined “Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine”, and focused on this far-right outpouring in Ukraine as being due to anti-Semitism, and to “pogroms against the Roma and LGBT,” as if Obama had cared about those groups. The chief obsession of Ukraine’s far-right has instead been anti-Russian, for at least a century, and that’s the actual fuel on which Obama was firing-up his coup in Ukraine: he was targeting against Russians, and not against Jews nor those other groups. By contrast, this article buried the anti-Russia issue, such as by saying, “A 2017 law mandated that secondary education be conducted strictly in Ukrainian, which infuriated Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and Greece. Several regions passed legislation banning the use of Russian in public life. Quotas enforce Ukrainian usage on TV and radio.” The one and only real target in Obama’s Ukraine is only Russia. The deception that’s practiced by America’s Democratic Party billionaires upon America’s left is probably even more insidious than is the deception that’s practiced by America’s Republican Party billionaires upon America’s right (“God, Mother, Country”). Deception of any person is mental coercion against that person, and such dishonesty is an especially highly skilled art for ‘leftist’ billionaires, because right-wing followers are unashamedly against the poor and minorities and anyone who is weak in the particular society. So, for example, in the present case: the people who were being herded into Odessa’s Trade Unions Building and burnt alive for printing and distributing anti-coup literature, on 2 May 2014, weren’t “Jews” or “Roma,” or “LGBT,” but instead just Ukrainians who were favorable toward Russia. Ukraine’s chief bigotry, under the Obama-imposed regime, is anti-Russian, not anti-Jewish, and any honest news-medium acknowledges this fact, instead of trying to deceive to hide it.
In Twentieth-Century U.S. history, the Republican Party was generally more right-wing than the Democratic Party; and, consequently, Obama’s moving the Democratic Party in the pro-nazi direction was an outright gift to Republicans, whose leading politicians were just as enthusiastic about the regime-change in Ukraine as the Democratic Party’s leadership was — and still is.
The irony here is that America’s biggest assaults against Russia have now come not during the Cold War, when there was an authentic ideological difference (communism versus capitalism), but instead after Russia, in 1991, ended the Cold War on its side (while the U.S. secretly has continued it on the U.S. side, in a craving for global conquest).
The classic article about the radicalism of Obama’s turn to nazism regarding Ukraine was written by an American who lived through these events in Ukraine while they were happening, George Eliason, who headlined, on 16 March 2014, just the first part of his four-part article, “The Nazi’s even Hitler was Afraid of”, and he subsequently posted the complete article here, where it can be read without those needless interruptions. He lives in Ukraine’s breakaway Donbass region, which Obama’s forces were bombing, and which Trump’s continue (though less) bombing, even today. Eliason reported honestly (not like The Nation, etc.). What Obama did to Ukraine was very geostrategic, and the changes in Ukraine were driven by U.S. billionaires, even more than by Ukrainian ones. Interpreting Ukraine’s current nazism as being directed mainly against Jews like Hitler’s German version was is profoundly misrepresenting.
Obama — with the help of both of America’s billionaire-controlled political Parties, and all of America’s billionaire-controlled or “mainstream” ‘news’-media — succeeded in transforming U.S. public opinion toward Russia, from neutral prior to his Ukrainian coup, to strongly negative immediately after it:
|Gallup Poll. Feb. 3-16, 2020. N=1,028 adults nationwide. Margin of error ± 4.|
|“Next, I’d like your overall opinion of some foreign countries. … What is your overall opinion of Russia? Is it very favorable, mostly favorable, mostly unfavorable, or very unfavorable?”|
Furthermore, during Obama’s first term, 2009-2012, he employed great cunning in order to portray himself as being supportive of a “reset in Russian-American relations,” and this lie (that he was intending to improve instead of to worsen U.S.-Russian relations) was one of the reasons he won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, but actually, when he entered office in 2009, he was already starting to plan regime-change not only in Ukraine but also in Syria (if not also in Libya) — two countries whose leaders were on cordial terms with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Obama was able to string Vladimir Putin along until 2012 to hope that Obama’s ‘reset with Russia’ wasn’t merely a ploy. On 26 March 2012, Obama informed Dmitry Medvedev to tell Putin that “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him [the incoming President Putin] to give me space. This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.” However, it was all a lie. His intention was the opposite. The fact is that, already, Obama was actually planning, even as early as 2011, to overthrow the neutralist Government right next door to Russia, in Ukraine, and to replace it with a rabidly anti-Russian regime on Russia’s doorstep, which he was planning to bring into NATO even though only around 30% of Ukrainians wanted Ukraine to join NATO. But Putin had no way of knowing that Obama was planning this. And immediately after Obama’s February 2014 coup in Ukraine, around 60% of Ukrainians suddenly wanted Ukraine to join NATO. (That’s because the newly installed Obama regime propagandized hatred against Russia, which is NATO’s specialty.) People felt that if even such a ‘peacemaker’ as Obama wasn’t ‘able’ to establish constructive relations with Putin, then there had to be something very wrong with Putin.
Obama’s 2012 campaign against Mitt Romney featured prominently this trap for Romney, and he fell right into it. On 16 May 2016, I headlined “Who Is the More Vicious Liar: Trump, or Obama?” and I described there the exquisite deception that Obama had practiced against Romney and also against Putin — and against the American public — regarding U.S.-Russian relations, and Obama’s brilliant use and exploitation of the hopes by each one of those three entities in order to win the Presidency and defeat not only Romney but also Putin, and especially Obama’s own Democratic Party voters.
That deception has largely shaped today’s political world, throughout the world. Barack Obama was like the mythical snake in Genesis 3.
On June 30th, TheGrayZone bannered “US claim of ‘Russian Bounty’ plot in Afghanistan is dubious and dangerous” and their Max Blumenthal put it well: “The constant flow of Russiagate disinformation into the bloodstream of the Democratic Party and its base is moving that party constantly to the right, while pushing the US deeper into this Cold War.” It allows the Republican Party to move even farther toward the right. It moves the political center to the right. Obama was the key figure in this ominous development, which is politically poisoning the entire world. He was an international war-criminal in Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and more, and should be executed for it (as should both Bush and Trump). (That’s executed, after appropriate legal process, not assassinated, which is horrible and produces martyrs instead of lawfully condemned villains.) But his toxic legacy on global politics is even more dangerous than those smaller catastrophes he participated in causing (and for which he deserves to be executed). He was exceedingly ambitious and achieved a lot, of disaster and far worse.
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
”Ukraine is the global beach-head for nazism, and even has two nazi Parties, one called ’Right Sector’ and the other called ’Freedom’”.
It’s the European values that the Ukros are so fond of. But no matter how many Nazi parties they are able to spawn, that doesn’t improve the Ukros’ prospects for the future. The abomi-Nation of ’Ukraine’ is a depopulating, deindustrialized wasteland of crime, corruption, and reactionary fanaticism. What that means is that Russia quite soon will be able to settle the land with ethnic Russians without having to fire a single shot. The inbred specimina in Galizia are in no position to stop that.
Well spoken. Ukraine has indeed been deindustrialized and depopulated. Analysts have pointed out that a day will come when Ukraine will cease to function as a state, as it won’t have enough of a work force. After that it will break up into three pieces. The Donbass will certainly rejoin Russia, followed by central Ukraine.
The author has stated “And immediately after Obama’s February 2014 coup in Ukraine, around 60% of Ukrainians suddenly wanted Ukraine to join NATO”. The 60 % figure is not easy to accept. Yes, I can accept 10 to 30 %, but never 60 %, bearing in mind that by December of 2017 a total of 4.4 million Ukrainians fled to Russia.
The sad point is that Ukraine was used for anti-Russian US policies. It is now paying the price, with the bulk of the population regretting the coup d’etat in 2014. Too late now. I fear that Ukraine is doomed as a state.
Yes, ‘Ukraine’ is doomed as a state. The corpse and its stench of decay is attracting the greedy hyena Poland, possibly also Hungary and Romania. Now, Poland has to be kept out at all cost, which is why Russia shouldn’t hesitate to claim her own cradle and then settle it fast with ethnic Russians. That way, ‘Ukraine’ becomes what it always was at bottom: Galicia. The latter could then be re-named ‘Bandera’s Ukronazi Banana Republic’.
This below adds a bit more hope to the above analysis. Trump needs to hunker down to fight one trade war at a time…China will hold the Looneylandia-ites off while Russia takes care of the Turkey/Saudi unholy alliance.
But he has to fight for his re election no matter what he is maneuvered into doing on the international scene. Taking on Germany in Europe?—Forget about it. By the time he leaves the pipeline to Biden ( or to whomever the US Supreme Court appoints after a few months of bickering) it all be already finished.
Watch NATO crumble when Greece gets into it with Turkey.
while Obama was certainly responsible for the coup in Ukraine happening on his watch, the driving force behind it was actually Victoria “f-ck the EU” Nuland…
“Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs ‘Toria’ Nuland was the ‘mastermind’ behind the Feb. 22, 2014 ‘regime change’ in Ukraine, plotting the overthrow of the democratically elected government of President Viktor Yanukovych while convincing the ever-gullible U.S. mainstream media that the coup wasn’t really a coup but a victory for ‘democracy.'”
Nuland is the wife of notorious neocon (Zionist), Robert Kagan, who co-founded the Project for the New American Century in 1998, the group that looked forward to “some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” that oddly turned out to be 9/11. That was the beginning of the so-called “war on terror” and all the color revolutions that eventually culminated in the Ukraine coup. Trump has continued to enable this Zionist wet dream of the US bankrupting itself with endless wars and eventually turning into a failed state… like it’s in the process of doing at this very moment. Everyone’s hands are dirty at this point.
Nuland prob personifies the evil of the zionist/neocon cabal perminently embeded in dc foreign policy establishment working on regime change ahd endless war; she left State and went to CNAS where she replaced Michèle Flournoy as CEO but did not last long. She currently is working with the odious madeline Albright’s “think tank.”
In a biden admin, she would prob land somewhere as would flournoy as sec def.
Humanity needs to be very careful what they wish for when it comes to who occupies high office in Warshington.
I always had a pet theory that had Hillery got her foot back in the door of the big old house again she would have appointed Nuland SOS as quick as a flash.
It is terrifying to imagine where we all would be by now if that dreadful combination had come to pass. Odds on much of humanity would have looked like burnt crisps in very short order.
So here we all are four painful years on and the choices are…drum roll followed by screeching cellos and violins…
#1 A re-elected and probably sickeningly emboldened, utterly incompetent compulsive groping MIGA with the unbelievably evil Neocon Fatboy as SOS… and the guaranteed imminent destruction of the empire.
#2 A swamp creature extraordinaire, who also happens to be a compulsive liar, is so cognitively impaired he has difficulty distinguishing between his wife and his sister and with an appalling line of ghoulish psychopaths waiting in the wings to fill the position of SOS…oh that’s right, I almost forgot…AND the guaranteed imminent destruction of the empire.
Nuland was appointed by Obama to run policy on Ukraine. Pyatt, the U.S. Ambassador in Ukraine, took his instruction from her, because he had been told that she spoke for the President. When her nominal boss, Secretary of State John Kerry, ordered Poroshenko to soften his aggressive policies against Russia, Nuland told Poroshenko to ignore him, and Obama backed Nuland. It humiliated Kerry. Only ignoramuses and idiots think that Nuland acted on her own. She had Obama’s back, and this is why when she told Pyatt that “Yats is the one” to run the new government when it would be formed, Pyatt immediately accepted that and did it. The coup in Ukraine was Obama’s policy, and Nuland merely was his agent in it, no free agent, at all. “while Obama was certainly responsible for the coup in Ukraine happening on his watch, the driving force behind it was actually Victoria ‘f-ck the EU’ Nuland” is the statement of an Obama apologist, a Kool-Aid swallower who displays his ignorance of the solidly documented history of the matter. Robert Parry was one of those, a Democratic Party fool, until near his end.
I think there’s a bigger picture here than Obama or the Nazis/Fascists even, but certain power structures and persons behind them, such as Ken Leslie also writes about on and for the Saker Blog, not to detract from Mr. Zuesse and his articles. I’m not talking ”conspiracy theory” here and monomanically fixated on one group of people necessarily but it’s a fact that some people do conspire, and lay plans that would not survive the light of day were they not secretive about them.
Ex Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko followed the action plan proposed by RAND analysts. The document provided three stages for the conduct of a military operation in eastern Ukraine.
The first stage was implemented which included the total isolation of the region considering that all local citizens are terrorists or sympathizers. The Region was encircled with troops and sealed off entirely from any flow of goods and persons. Broadcasting services, Internet connection, telephone and mobile communications in the region were shut down.
The second stage is the Mop-up which failed miserably as they were defeated militarily. Ground assaults were preceded with air strikes against the strategic facilities in heavily civilian populated areas. The use of non-conventional arms was used, ie chemical weapons, phospherous munitions etc. The document also required internment camps outside the cleared settlements, which of course never occurred. The people featuring in combat engagement were to be tried in court as terrorists.
During the third stage there was suppose to be normal power supplies and communications being restored. The borders were tol be strengthened to avoid possible provocations. All the refugees should be checked for possible support for separatists in internment camps.
If i could attach GIF’s i would post the document.
“The way America’s fake-‘progressive’, Democratic-Party billionaires-controlled, press, deals with the Democratic Party’s own “first Black President” Barack Obama (winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for his deceptive rhetoric) having done this — actually having stoked now racism throughout the world, targeted particularly against Russians — is to focus on the Democratic Party media’s distractionist theme of inter-ethnic, inter-religious, racist and other divisive American conflicts, as if this nazi problem’s overflowing now in Ukraine is not driven instead by geostrategic and imperialistic concerns in specifically U.S. policymaking, driven actually by America’s billionaires’ craving an all-encompassing global conquest, including conquest ultimately of Russia, which will be the last since it is the only other nuclear superpower.”
This sentence is far too long.
Was it difficult to understand?
Yes, a bit difficult to follow and, if we take the time to parse it, we’ll find that it is also grammatically incorrect.
But I enjoyed the article VERY much.
The two-party system in the US is simply not reformable. The two candidates selected to compete for POTUS in 2020 should demonstrate this conclusively. The US public, beaten down by unrelenting propaganda, are largely lost. The only thing that will stop this imperial juggernaut is financial ruin. That is coming.
Gee, why would a Ukrainian hate jews? Never heard of the Holodomor? They were nothing compared to the Bolsheviks. Every American should be studying the Holodomor and Stalin’S terror. Learn what the Bolsheviks did to Christian Ukrainians and Russians. Because you may well be RELIVING it.
“All you freedom-loving “left wing” thinkers in the West! You left-laborites! You progressive American, German, and French students! As far as you are concerned, this whole book of mine is a waste of effort. You may suddenly understand it all someday – but only when you yourselves hear ‘hands behind your backs there!’ and step ashore on our Archipelago.”Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
This is what they would visit on You: “We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white Negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. The only difference is that this will be a left-wing tyranny, not a right-wing tyranny. It will be a red tyranny and not a white one. We mean the word ‘red’ literally, because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison.” – Leon Trotsky
“The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions of life must give way…. They must perish in the revolutionary holocaust.” – Karl Marx, Marx People’s Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981 …… (He is advocating “Holocaust” in 1856 … years before Hitler was even born)
The European People saw what was being done to the Christian Ukranian/Russian People by the Bolsheviks, even though Americans never pay attention to what is going on. Do you think the actions of the Bolsheviks just might have influenced Hitler’s (and European Christians’) view of Jews. He did not “hate them for no reason” These horrors happened as Hitler was climbing the ladder and he knew what they were doing to Christians, unlike America where Bolshevik actions were Not reported….before the pogroms were the tax collectors who impaled many peasant…and before that… and pretty soon we’re back in the Old Testament.
Please stop using capitals and tone down your language – which has been amended on this one occasion. Any further comments will go to the trash. Mod.
An apologia for Hitler and the Fascists on a website that is Anti-Fascist and on an article comment section about Fascists taking over the two major American political parties? Unreal, what nerve. Get a grip, you obviously have a case of ”Jew on the brain” and can barely contain yourself. Hitler and his kind were all about war and conquest, to enslave and/or exterminate ”inferior races”, to extend an empire across the world built on top of the grave of Christianity.
This kind of thinking disgusts me and is beneath contempt.
” Get a grip, you obviously have a case of ”Jew on the brain” and can ”
I see you totally avoided addressing his main points.
Hitler was a very Western politician, sharing the Anglo-Americans’ White racist contempt and flair for land-grabbing, enslavement, and mass murder. One might have thought that poor little Adolf who was putting his own life at great risk at places such as Verdun and Somme would have committed himself to genocide against the Anglos and French — the Russians didn’t fire a single bullet at the corporal messenger. But, as fitting for a top-notch piece of Euro-trash, Hitler knew how to assure his fellow Westerners of his credentials. This wasn’t really difficult or even needed — right in the wake of the armistice that officially ended WW1, the Entente entrusted the German army to invade Ukraine, Belarus, and the Baltic statelets. Hitler wasn’t actively participating in this orgy of genocidal violence, but was elated at the prospect of land-grabbing especially at the expense of Slavic Untermenschen. All the hogwash about the Russian Revolution that was to be used as pretext for Nazi militancy in Weimar Germany is below contempt. Firstly, it was the German General Staff proper that had seen to it that Lenin could travel from Switzerland to Russia in 1917. Secondly, the Bolsheviks did what was expected of them as the humiliating peace accord was signed at Brest-Litovsk in March 1918 with its ensuing loss of territory at Russia’s expense, vastly expanding Germany eastwards.
On this basis, Hitler comes across as an all-out Western bootlicker and unashamed racist. The Ukros which were blessed by Germany’s invading armies in 1918 and 1941 and the Euromaidan this century are trying to show their credentials too.
Well said. Hitler’s Anglophilia is well known and historically documented in Mein Kampf for example, explaining the odd pause at Dunkirk, the ”Sitzkreig” before the invasion of France and the Low Countries, and so forth. And note well that these types never mention the Vatican, and gloss over the Anti-Orthodox Christian and Anti-Slav Crusade that the period 1914-1945 truly was… No, their scapegoat is a familiar one, even though the Nazis and the extremist Zionists got along surprisingly well.
Hitler was incensed by the draconian financial reparations imposed on Germany at the Treaty of Versailles at the end of WW1 1914-18 by western bankers, who controlled the money supply. His war on the Jews failed to eliminate them, however, probably because most of them lived in Switzerland. The rise of Germany as a military industrial powerhouse during the 1930s was achieved by the creation of debt free money, that was issued directly by the German government to people and corporations for work done in producing necessary goods to defend itself, such as autobahns, volkswagens, panzers, Messerschmitts, Dorniers and Heinkels. This did not go down too well with the private bankers, that resulted in Britain declaring war on Germany in 1939.
Hitler was so incensed by the ”November Criminals” who signed the treaty representing Germany that he… Gave the surviving ones a pension and never so much as touched a hair on their heads.
Hitler knew that he couldn’t have rose to power without Versailles and the Weimar Republic, and so he was grateful, and had no intention of seeing the German Monarchies restored at all.
And Hitler and the International Banks? Maybe some should read up on Hjalmar Schacht. Hitler was quite indebted to the German bankers and Industrialists for his rise to power as well.
German Emperor Wilhelm II and the Reichstag decided unanimously to fund WW1 1914-18 entirely by borrowing, a decision criticized by financial experts such as Hjalmar Schacht as a dangerous risk for currency devaluation.
The government believed that it would be able to pay off the debt by winning the war, as it would be able to annex resource-rich industrial territory in the west and east and impose massive reparations on the defeated Allies.
This strategy failed as Germany lost the war, which left the new Weimar Republic saddled with massive war debts that it could not afford, a problem exacerbated by printing money without any economic resources to back it. The demand in the Treaty of Versailles for draconian reparations further accelerated the decline in the value of the mark.
Ultimately this led to hyperinflation of the mark in 1921-23
In response to this dire situation, Hitler decided to create debt free money. Hitler and the National Socialists, who came to power in 1933, thwarted the international banking cartel by issuing their own money. One billion non-inflationary bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates, were then issued against this cost. This money was then paid to the German workforce for work actually carried out, that was the spent into the German economy.
Ultimately, total economic autarky such as printing this fiat money out of thin air-doing what the ”International bankers” are doing except on a national scale I might add- was nothing more than the realizing of Germany’s plans for conquest, of not having to rely on imports-easily cut off-for Germany’s survival. The economic plan made sense only in the context of a senseless and brutish ideology.
All wars are bankers wars, since they plunge both sides into debt to their detriment and subjugation.
Why should any currency be privatized, when it is so easy to create money as a data entry on a computer these days ? The banks are just parasites on the economy, who create money out of thin air as interest bearing debt. It is time that this fraud was ended.
Seeing that school bus, with windows blown out with bullet holes through the side and blood all over the ground just hurt my heart bad! There are people who need to be made to leave this world. Or, in the words of General Schwarzkopf “God is the judge. We just arrange the appointment”. Another project for the evil empire.
I can only see a very destructive war drawing near. They have not spent all this time positioning military hardware and destroying countries because they don’t intend to follow through. I believe we are in the end game now. The rulers of the world have stomped on the accelerator. The new world order crowd wants their feudal world order and they want it now. I hope the Russian leadership understands what they are up against. As the saying goes ‘fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me’. The zombies who celebrate their great U.S., land of the free and home of the brave are too stupid to know they are being enslaved too. People in Canada are equally as stupid.
Yup its ((( NAZIS ))) who control the Western world. Those same pesky ((( Nazis ))) also terrorize Palestinians.
Maybe you should read up on the radical zionist/nazi/fascist connection;
I don’t think you’re looking at the big picture here.
Almost reads like parody. Anyone who uses the word “nazi” uncritically and unironically is not a person to be taken seriously. Why not just call people “stinky mean poo-poo heads”? Its a far more meaningful term than nazi.
If it reads like a parody, it’s because the subject matter (’Ukraine’) is one. And, seriously, who would be convinced by somebody rabbiting on about ’stinky mean poo-poo heads’ when militant Ukros really are Nazis, especially with regard to Russia and her people? Eric Zuesse’s post has no need of any infantilism.
What Nazism?! LGBTism, feminism and mass immigration is already being shoved down Ukrainian throats! The Nazism argument is old and retarded, this is not 2014 anymore.
”The Nazism argument is old and retarded, this is not 2014 anymore.”
Which makes de-nazification in ’Ukraine’ even faster than the one in the successor state of the Third Reich; West Germany. No, the Nazis are still around in ’Ukraine’, Galicia especially, but have themselves become old and retarded after having botched everything they had been assigned to carry out by their beloved ”allies” Germany and the US.
It should add massive insult to injury in the eyes of the Ukros when the great and glorious West lets them know that they can take their racial superiority fantasies and drop dead by settling 3rd world immigrants on Ukro soil. Likewise, the awesome gift of consolatation to the Ukros in the form of LGBTQ will spawn some quite amusing reactions.
On the other hand, the attempt by certain parties to make the Ukraine a bastion for a geopolitical change in Europe in general, seems to me a viable possibility. That is, the old ”Intermarium” project, re-worked for the modern era and having the Visagrad Group+Ukraine as it’s core.
Actually, I think that both parties have been pro-Nazi since the beginning of the twentieth century. Hitler was really part of a western international movement. He did not start it. Since many of its victims were that of marginalized populations, it went widely unnoticed and unreported for well over a century. Now it is affecting the majority of the population, so it is noticed. Eugenics has been practiced in America and in universities since the start of the 20th century. Nazism is a creation of universities. It is based on scientific fraud and a fraudulent system of everything. It is also a control fraud system, and system of mass control. When the majority of the population was having its needs met, it went unquestioned and unnoticed. Now the majority of the population is not having its needs met, and after over a century, they finally realized that they are every bit as much as a nazi as Hitler was, even if they are Jewish.
Fascism came to America wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross in 1900, and few people noticed, and the ones that did were accused of being insane.
Ive always thought Ukrainians are a nice people.
They like their own identity and have a justified gripe with Russia because of Stalin’s atrocities there.
But their alignment with EU is not wise – it needs to be non aligned.
Sorry, but the Ukros are notorious with their ”creative accounting”. Stalin didn’t butcher or torment the Ukros; Imperial, Weimar, and Nazi Germany did. The ’Holodomor’ is a stand-in non-event modelled on a very real tragedy. Ukraine suffered deliberately created genocidal famine at the hands of the invading German army 1918 – 1919. The funny thing here is that the Ukros remain very fond of Germany despite all the horrors inflicted by the latter in Ukraine (including the Euromaidan). The Ukros understand that to curry favour with the great and glorious West, anti-Soviet horror stories are mandatory. So the Ukros happily decided to replace the very real, intentional famine that Germany brought about in the wake of WW1 with a bogus ”famine” allegedly orchestrated by Stalin in the 1930s. Pathetic, to say the very least.
Ukrainian SSR — a modern, scientific and industrial powerhouse
’Independent’ Ukraine — a Nazi-infested asylum undergoing deindustrialization and depopulation
But I agree, “Nazism” and Hitlerism are not a good thing. I think a valuable insight into the essence of this thing comes from reading the book entitled by “Savitri Devi” Maximiani Julia Portas of French lineage entitled “The Lightning and the Sun” published in 1958, articulating that the noble, strong, healthy, predatory animals are better than the overwhelming majority of humans who should therefore be exterminated,—and that the Jewish concept articulated in the Book of Genesis, that humans are to be superior to animals and nature, thus seeking to preserve all human lives is the real reason why Jews are considered the ultimate enemy.. Accordingly, Hitler was part of a movement of extreme environmentalism, rooted in certain beliefs about historical cycles and beliefs in degeneration of humans, belief in the need to exterminate almost all humans and leave only a tiny number of “superior Aryan types” who would be overwhelmingly “warlike” and therefore “noble”—so they would eventually kill each other off and leave the planet to the noble animals.
A certain peculiar intelligence which can only be described as virulently non-human and anti-human infests the leaders of societies which enjoy the highest achievements in science, technology and engineering so that there arose an overall policy and objective, to remake the whole world:—physical combat prowess would be fostered so as to generate the maximum amounts of rage energies and fear energies as ends in themselves, not really material profits or money. The predatory animals would be fostered, and the wilderness, as their habitat over the world. Humans would become drastically fewer, the human population would become drastically reduced to maybe just a couple million or just a few hundred thousand,—but those humans would be racially “purely healthy” and “purely beautiful” and “purely warlike glorying in deadly physical combat”.