by Denis A. Conroy for the Saker Blog
Awoke this morning and thought it was time to review my political convictions as it had become apparent that the war in Ukraine was beholden to the usual ‘us-and-them’ arrangements that stood in for enlightened insight… Another day wherein the propaganda-controlled media confronted me with the power of its’ nuclear-ballistic narrative (based on fire power), to assure me that our ace-in-the hole superior mediation could slam dunk those who refused to acknowledge Western exceptionality-a clear sign that the Pentagon was in bed with The Chicago School of economics.
My ruminations continued as I set about preparing breakfast…I found time for coffee despite the chaos beyond my boundaries. What was wrong with our market-oriented economy? Was our model up shit creek?
We in the West have a problem it seems? People of the lesser than white pigmentation are no longer accepting the fact that we, the descendants of the first European industrial revolution, can be trusted. We, who colonized great swathes of the non-industrialized world are no longer being viewed as magnanimous partners in any sharing sense.
The neo-conservative West tried exporting its’ Globalization (WTO) rules-based business-school mentality that underpins the theories of the Chicago School of Economics to the entire planet. The white man’s burden should be applied and set… and reset… according to the rules of the inchoate modernist unilateralist and utility-minded who eschew democracy over money.
The dream; to regroup in order to grow the capitalist vision of capturing Eurasia in a muscular web of 800 military bases put there to inhibit the development of peer modelling, meant full spectrum dominance.
On hearing the news that Washington was giving Ukraine a 64 billion super-duper military handout, the inner consultant took over from the inner muse and my mind went into equative overdrive.
Do the righteous amongst us choose formulaic thinking over science-based deductive observation? Well, the answer to that seems to be a big yes!
Shall we start with the Jewish controlled media? The Jewish ability to trade themselves to the center of power is impressive, but does it contain the seed of a truly universal outlook, or is it anchored in ethnic moorings that have succeeded in pulling off a coup par excellence that has taken the West by storm! The question is, does it require an arcane narrative in order to occupy the high moral ground? And, having acquired the moral high ground vis a vis alliance with power brokers, does this give them the right to LORD it over those who are told that they are checkmated vis a vis 800 military bases in Eurasia or the iron rim of the Gaza strip. All of this is precisely what Mainstreet Media is conniving at. Accept our ‘truth’ or we will execute great vengeance upon our enemies with furious rebukes (and Palestine and America are not the only counties that have an Anglo-Zionist problem). Think of what America and Israel have in common; exemption from the injurious consequences of their actions (what’s that line again about actions speaking louder than words and why are their cinematic art forms so bereft of human dignity?).
For instance, PULP FICTION, released in 1994 as an American black comedy neo-noir crime film written and directed by Quentin Tarantino, is from a story by Tarantino and Roger Avery. It was, and continues to be a cultural watershed…a great piece of cinematic art capturing the myopia within American culture. Samuel Jacksons treatment of Ezekiel’ passage 25:17 “And I will execute great vengeance upon them with furious rebukes; and they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall lay my vengeance upon them” is quintessentially, American hubris.
Pulp Fiction grafts contemporary narrative on arcane roots in antiquity to create a novel way of resolving the delusions of myopic grandeur that beset Jules Winnfield, a thug in need of redemption. The society Tarantino presents to the public is one where hype and entertainment paralyse the human spirit as the market economy goes about its business shredding the wellbeing of its’ citizens…the sense that an intractable appetite for personal gratification has become America’s raison d’etre is all pervasive.
Marsellus Wallace is a gang boss and husband to Mia Wallace. He is the boss of Vincent Vega, Jules Winnfield, Butch Coolidge and many other unknown gangsters. He famously states that the business he’s in “is filled with unrealistic motherfuckers” when addressing Butch Coolidge (Bruce Willis), a pugilist being forced to “throw” a fight. The term motherfucker here implies the existence of somebody of indeterminate status and inevitably applies to all who get in the way of any dominant actor seeking power…hegemony…over others in a rat-race to the top. The three stories capture the ineluctable spread of corruption that seeps through to every nook and cranny of society…leaving Hollywood to capitalize on one unholy mess.
So before leaving part two, a thought: Does Volodymyr Zelensky realize what the tide of neo-conservatism lapping at the shores of Ukraine would bring to that hapless country?
When propaganda took control of macro-America, the media went along with the process of shoving Americas’ Foreign Policy ‘down the throat of all and sundry. It happened when America found itself the sole superpower on the planet. What followed was the marshaling of Anglo/Zionist forces to downplay the role of government in economics. With the help of Milton Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics, governments throughout the West became separated from governance. The Chicago School was libertarian and laissez-faire at its core, rejecting Keynesian notions of governments managing aggregate economic demand to promote growth. It was a 1930s form of economic unilateralism that succeeded in keeping finance out of the hands of the so-called ‘turbulent’ masses. It also became the political incarnation of colonial interference, aided and abetted by military overkill forever available to induct or vamoose main-street–ness.
“MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” became the clarion call of muscular America in the service of promoting the United States of Americas’ dream of empire. But was anybody listening? When Biden said “America is back”, was anybody listening? When Putin said enough is enough, quit the provocation, was he or anybody in Bidens’ administration listening? When the nonaligned nations of the world rejected Americas sanctioning of Russia, was anybody in the West listening? Isn’t it time Americans consulted their inner jerks and gave a thought to the suffering their imperial obsession has wrought on Afghanistan and Palestine, to mention but two examples of the arcane mindset.
Hollywood, the dream machine always gets it right. Life in America is about coupling in one way or another…couples struggling with their destinies are at the hub of the three stories that did it for Pulp Fiction in an extremely fractious way. Hollywood became Hollywood because it succeeded in identifying the American existential narrative as a drama belonging to couples or individuals compelled, by external social conditions, to trade their way through a dog-eat-dog system designed to produce winners and losers from within its protean boundaries.
America and Palestine are not the only countries…nations…with an Anglo-Zionist problem!!
As Europe squishes under the yoke of the pulpy Atlantic Alliance, there is little reason to believe that hope might spring eternally from the minds of its’ generally mediocre neo-conservative leadership.
Great stuff and 100%, nailed it.
– Great stuff and 100%, nailed it.
– With the help of Milton Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics, governments throughout the West became separated from governance. The Chicago School was libertarian and laissez-faire at its core, rejecting Keynesian notions of governments managing aggregate economic
Here the message is the problem is laissez-faire type economists, and that Harvard-Berkeley Liberal economists [saltwater school] are the solution
( it is connected to the freshwater school of macroeconomics, in contrast to the saltwater school based in coastal universities (notably Harvard, Yale, Penn, UC Berkeley, and UCLA). )
“Here the message is the problem is laissez-faire type economists, and that Harvard-Berkeley Liberal economists [saltwater school] are the solution”
I get the problem. I Agree 100% with him. “Chicago schoo”l neoliberalism is at the heart of the problem and is the ideological motivation for the liberal empire ; finance capital from the imperial center to impose a rentier economic colonialism on the the rest of the world who become “the periphery” , and serve as resource and labor appendages ..No doubts, and no serious argument can be made to refute the truth of this, but the author didn’t offer up a solution implied or otherwise. Whatever the authors opinion the reference to Keynesianism is historical .
Yes it is!!
Money policy [austerity] caused the Great Depression. In other words, government cause the Great Depression.
Keynesianism policy is very much government intervention.
Milton Friedmans analysis of the Great Depression is there was no systemic collaps in US in 1929. The failing banks, like Bank of America, could have been saved by government.
– The neo-conservative West tried exporting its’ Globalization (WTO) rules-based business-school mentality that underpins the theories of the Chicago School of Economics to the entire planet.
“Neo-cons” are the liberal foreign policy hawks (= Liberals)
“Neoliberalism” is free market Chicago School of Economics (= Conservative/Libertarians)
They are opposites in the way “neo-con” is about foreign policy doctrines, while “neoliberalism” is a monetarism in economic policy.
Quatitative easing 2008-
– Obama said Bernanke’s background, temperament, courage and creativity helped to prevent another Great Depression in 2008
Denis A. Conroy mix together “Neo-con” and “neoliberalism”
Am I the only vine in the vineyard that has been pruned free of the brain singed frustration producing headaches of the limited human mind’s ability to grapple with and “get a handle” on all that has taken place in the past and what will take place in the future ?. Have you never heard these words before, ” Who can speak and have it happen if the Lord has not decreed it ?”(Lamentation 3:37). The Lord God Almighty is real ! I have personal evidence to prove it. He spoke to me up there before He put me in my mother’s womb.
Let me guess, we’re all just playing chess with God to see which of us can outguess His next move before what He has decreed to happen does ! Right ! Therefore we can declare ourselves loved by God, or at least in league with Him. We were told that God finished His work (us) before He created the World (Heavens and the Earth) Therefore we are all just living out the script for each one of us that God wrote before He created Adam and Eve.
“He who diggeth a pit shall fall therein, and he who rolleth a stone, it will return upon him” (Proverbs 26:27) Those who have refused to retain God in their knowledge have been given over to “reprobate (Webster’s unabridged – rejected as unsavable, foreordained to damnation) minds. As you try to understand why they think and do as they do, realize that they are working the thoughts of a reprobate mind, because they have rejected the knowledge of God’s existence.
Do not hate any people because of the race they come from. There will be some in heaven from every nation, kindred, and tongue. Not all Jews are saved because they are God’s “chosen people”. When Jesus our Savior walked in the flesh on the earth, some of the Jews who contended with Him proclaimed proudly that they were the “son’s of Abraham” and the Lord corrected them and said, You are not the sons of Abraham but the devil. If you were the son’s of Abraham you would have done as Abraham did, who rejoiced to see my day.
Denis A Conroy is left wing Liberal
– The spirits of Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Hugo Chavez, Patrice Lumumba, Salvador Allende, Fidel Castro, to name but a few are not likely to disappear into the margins of history anytime soon.
Trump is presented as = deep state swamp (it cannot be more out of touch with reality than that)
Conroy about Trump’s State of Union speech 2019 (end of impeachment process)
– A strange collection of bi-partisan Barbie Dolls from both sides of the House stood, sat, clapped and smirked as the Grand Inquisitor touched upon America’s putative role as leader of the free world
Really. A left wing liberal.
It is clear that you don’t have a clue of what he said. And that is the idea here – Not what the author is (and you may be totally off the mark), but the material presented.
Surprise me, and let me know that you have an idea about the material.
Lenin was a Juan Guaidó figure, paid for by the collective west (UK,US and europe, in that order) to exsterminate the Russian royal family and bring Russia under the control of the British Empire.
Like Juan Guaidó, Lenin was a largely unknown figure in rural Russia.
A cult can only end abruptly and violently. And the tribe of the Anglo-Zionist empire cult with its financial and narrative temples must be razed to the ground.
We, the people(s).
Denis, you have earned my respect for what it’s worth. Fantastic, well written article intertwined with pop culture references and truth about the media owners.
Just think how many millions of millions of human beings the white Europeans have sacrificed to bring the world to where it is now. And do it in the name of the Christian doctrine of love!
Christian doctrine of love…..did you read the article? Christians, in general, have no power. Everything must be financed by some’one’, go back, reread the article, the answer is right there.
Christianity was subverted, then molded to resemble dogmatic madness, there is no shortage of non christians that held high positions within the ‘catholic’ clergy i.e. Popery.
Who were those non christians, take in some Brother Nathaniel’s vids. Or, go back and reread this article.
I think you missed the point of the article.
The US government practices Keynesian economics. How’s that working out?
Many of us ordinary people in America would like to live in a genuine free market economy. We’d like the politicians and their bureaucrats to get out of our way and let us trade with each other free of their hubris that they know what’s best for us. We’d like an honest monetary system, gold and silver based, that would prevent these power hungry people from destroying our economy and society as they are quite effectively doing now.
We’d like to live like free men and women responsible for our own lives, and be holden not to the corrupt state, but to each other through the free and voluntary choices we make to buy from and sell to whoever we please. The latter process is real democracy and all of us as consumers vote with our pocket books deciding which producers are doing a good job.
Unfettered capitalism is a vision of hell. It inevitably leads to imperialism ,bombing and invading countries that like the state to help out the poorer and vulnerable in society.It leads to the destruction of countries that want health,education and social services based not on greed and profit but need and human rights.
The US Democratic Party like the UK Labour Party are mere pawns of the capitalists.They divert any meaningful movement for equality towards accepting the status quo with a bit of tinkering around the periphery.
Capitalism is fractional reserve banking, not industrialization. For example, the Soviet Union was industrialized under communism.
In fact, what has destroyed the United States is the fractional reserve bankers policy of DEINDUSTRIALIZING the country..
– Unfettered capitalism is a vision of hell
Both Russia and China is relying on extensive market economy – keeping tax rate as low as possible.
So we may say all Russia and China (add North Korea) have scrapped sosialism
Just a question: Was Rome “Capitalist”? Was Persia “Capitalist”? We’re the Mongols “Capitalist”? We’re the Egyptians “Capitalist”? Was Catherine the Great “Capitalist”? Was Alexander the Great “Capitalist”? Was Spain “Capitalist”?
– The US Democratic Party
The Democrats are those who favor weaponizing everything. Trade should be a weapon. Food should be a weapon. Oil should be a weapon. Kissinger and the Bushes were the same. Bush and Clinton were close friends, so I don’t see much difference.
“weaponizing everything” is Leninism.
Chile 1973: Nixon weaponized trade with Chile. That we all know. What few know is Chile’s military is infiltrated by nazis. Pinochet was head of the military.
Well said sir.
” Pulp Fiction” is nothing but nihilism that stands in stark contrast to valuable human tradition. It is no coincidence that they send naked whores to violate Orthodox churches in Moscow. And we were just informed that the Emperor was taking showers with his own daughter!
Think about it for a moment. 800 fascist Zionist militarist bases to impose nihilism on the world!
” Volodymyr Zelensky realize what the tide of neo-conservatism lapping at the shores of Ukraine would bring to that hapless country?”
Does he care?
Why would he? He’s got his.
Zelinsky, a member of the phallic worshipping tribe who PRETEND to be a fictional 13th tribe of Isreal is, I’m sure, delighted.
After all, they are the primary producers and distributors of porn around the world.
Well said! Thank you, much enjoyed and will
Deductive reasoning yes indeed!!
Ah, the Zionist’s are getting everything wrong! You know the reference about the Valley of Dry Bones a great army coming to life is said to be a reference to a nations rebirth? actually it occurred and will again in the resurrection of Christ and the second yet to occur. Remember His words about the last days? However, look how it’s interpreted as referring to a nations rebirth? Thanks I guess to CI Scofield!!!
Next to that is the utter nonsense of Magog and Gog, Ezekiel 38 being the current nations of Russia and Germany who are supposed to attack Usrael.
As for 800 military bases. In Book of Revelation we find what men going to war against God?
And get this Presudent Johnson was of the opinion that America had to put into orbit military satellites to control weather? What nobody reads the Bible about Divine communication arriving in the form of climate change? Gods words in Ezekiel 25 is followed up with the arrival of tornados, hail, and fir Israel herself droughts!!! He made that extremely and abundantly clear in practically every book of the Old Testament and a number of the New.
But I guess we enjoy being lied to that’s it all the oil industry fault?
When Putin said enough is enough, quit the provocation, was he or anybody in Bidens’ administration listening? When the nonaligned nations of the world rejected Americas sanctioning of Russia, was anybody in the West listening?
Of course not. To wit: Top Gun: Maverick. An insipid rehash of tired 1980’s war mongering schlock, which was juvenile the first time around, now doubly so 36 years later with the same posturing idiot starring in the lead role at the ripe old age of 59. America is in the senile dementia state of its existence now, locked away in a prison of its own delusional fantasies and fed heavily medicated Jell-O to facilitate its near-catatonic “Comfortably Numb” state.
Here for ones reading pleasure a quote from Dr. Hudson and if added to these words these neocons actually believe Russia is the great Magog well one surely has all the answers ones needs:
Michael Hudson 1:36:56
President Biden is a front man. They’re all the front men for the faceless people in the State Department, the neocons who are controlling things. Biden has always been right-wing, just a corrupt party politician. He does what he’s paid to do. He’s unimaginative. He’s brought in some real Russia haters – people who have a visceral hatred of Russia because of their family background under the tsars or under Stalin. Blinken said that his family was Jewish and lost under the tsars, and maybe under Stalin. He wants to kill Russians because he’s so angry at what they did to his ancestors. That is the neocon mentality in a nutshell. It’s a crazy mentality.
– because of their family background under the tsars or under Stalin. … . That is the neocon mentality in a nutshell.
Pardon me. It was the Bolsheviks who hated and murdered the Tsar, for historical reasons. The Bolsheviks are not related to neocon.
I have always wondered in case of hollywood whether it is art imitating life or the other way around. In my opinion it is the other way around. hollywood and other media combine to lead people through such insanely illogical paths that EOL finds itself at a crossroads today.
Brainwashing begins very early in life. They teach that life is not fair. Nobody asks says who. In a just society life would be fair. Then comes the second lesson that cheat but do not get caught. Such subliminal messages are taught through the media.
While they are busy with tricks, their day of reckoning is approaching fast and their edifice of evil is precariously hanging on the edge.
The demons will set the world on fire once they realize their days of supremacy are over. Do not expect them to act like sane human beings.
American Economy Predicaments
by Walter Trkla published on (Swans – October 20, 2008) The origins of the problem which Denis outlines.
The problem with the American economy, like all other industrial economies, is how to achieve, simultaneously, full employment, price stability, and economic growth. In order to achieve these objectives, any economy, of which the United States is no exception, must answer the following questions: what to produce, how to produce it, and who gets the final product. The Reagan government chose supply-side economic policies, as opposed to the theory called demand-side economics, to answer these questions. This has led to the present economic crisis in America. Both theories have the same objective; however, each theory attacks the economic problem from opposite ends. The supply side addresses the economic objective through the business sector, while the demand side tackles it through the consumer sector. Roosevelt, in the 1930s, used demand-side economic policies to stimulate the economy, while Reagan some fifty years later used the supply-side economic policy to try and achieve the same outcome. “Ted Lowie has suggested that what America has done is to introduce a new form of socialism; it leaves profit to the private market, but it socializes risk, which is in effect assumed by the government, which then spreads the cost across the backs of the taxpayer.” (1) The result of Reagan’s policies, however, was a social backlash and a polarized society. The gap between the rich and the poor became wider, which the supply-side economics was supposed to narrow. These economic policies created racial, cultural, economic, and social backlash, where the “cure became worse than the illness.”
The supply-side theory, which is also called “trickle-down” theory, “Thatcherism,” “Reaganomics,” or better known by its opponents as the “horse and the sparrow” theory, or again, as Bush Sr. called it, “Voodoo Economics,” emphasizes the production side of the market. This theory calls for the government to stimulate the economy by reducing taxes, lowering interest rates, and selling off government services. This theory also suggests that government regulations are harmful to business. As a result, supply-side governments may compromise the safety of workers by eliminating mandatory holidays, safety equipment, smoke-free environment, and minimum wages so that business has more profit for investment. Furthermore, supply-side economists suggest that low minimum wage leaves more profit in the hands of business, lower interest rates make borrowing cheaper allowing more investment capital, lower taxes mean more profit resulting in more dollars for investment, and deregulation or fewer rules and paperwork provides the business with opportunity for more investment. These savings, according to the father of Reaganomics, Milton Friedman, are reinvested by the entrepreneur in new businesses providing economic growth.
Reagan was elected on a platform to create economic growth. The private sector with low taxes, deregulation, and low interest rates, limited spending on social programs, and low minimum wage, according to Reagan’s economic advisors, was able to produce more goods, employ more people, and stimulate the economy. Increased employment, supply-side economists felt, leads to increased spending and more demand for goods and services. In a simple way, this demand pull by consumers, creates wealth and economic growth and stability. This logic works as long as those who benefit from these policies reinvest their savings in the domestic market.
In most Western nations, wealth is controlled by a small minority. In America, ten percent of the population controls over sixty-seven percent of the national wealth. Recent government tax cuts were supposed to create thousands of jobs; however, some forty economists suggest that only a fraction of the planned jobs were created because the “controllers of wealth” spend most of their savings outside the country. They purchase big ticket items such as automobiles, they take holidays outside the province, they have offshore accounts, and invest in factories in China and the Philippines where wages are low and profits are high. As a result, the effect of the tax cut is lost. In order to make up for the tax cuts, the government has cut education budgets, medical services, and social welfare programs. At the same time, the Reagan and Bush governments have increased user fees on government services, certifying unions and deregulating the forest industry, as well as, privatizing government services. Most of the cost of this supply-side economics is achieved at the expense of lower income people who received the lowest tax cuts. Reagan blamed Carter for the American economic ills and, similarly, John McCain, who voted with the Bush II presidency ninety-five percent of the time, attempts to hide his support of the Bush administration by trying to tie Obama to all kinds of innuendo loaded associations with social activists.
During the Reagan presidency, we saw the deregulation of finance and loan businesses that led to two hundred billion dollars in financial losses with the collapse of the deregulated Savings and Loan sector. This event led to a financial crisis in America. To eliminate criticism of his government deregulation, Reagan deregulated the broadcasting industry that supported his policies. The repercussion of this was that the broadcasting industry dropped most public interest programs in favor of more profitable programs.
Similarly, Reagan blamed the permissiveness of the 1960s and 1970s for the economic and moral decline in America. He responded by union bashing and eliminating affirmative action programs, while at the same time dismantling the air traffic controllers union. He eliminated social programs for the poor. This created social conflict between the poor blacks who were seen as tax users, and the whites who were seen as taxpayers. Conservatives ignored the fact that black men were most often unemployed because they did not have the education and skills of their white counterpart.
Reagan blamed feminists for the increase in divorce, family violence, promiscuity, and rise in female crime rate. Sociologists such as Rita Simon disagreed with the view that feminism was a cause of female crime and attributes the slight increase in female criminality to the economic liberation of women. Other sociologists such as Adler stated that male and female crime is converging. This caused a backlash because she suggested that female economic liberation would lead to greater increase in female crime of all types. Media and right-wing women’s groups ignored Adler’s familial explanation of female crime and sensationalized her liberation hypothesis, saying that feminism was the cause of the increase in female criminality. The media ignored her economic liberation thesis, to which Adler attributed the case of female and male crime convergence.
Likewise, the religious right blamed the decline of the American family on feminism rather than economic disparity. The religious fundamentalist backlash was the promotion of the alternative — the “real women” who looked after their children and home and went to church regularly. The “real women,” who represented a Fascist model of womanhood glorified “the three Ks” — Kinder, Kirche, and Kuche, (Children, Church, and Cooking). This was the conservative response to the “free love” of the sixties and seventies. This hostile response to what “real women” called permissiveness led to an explosion of self-help books and scare tactics directed towards working mothers who had children in daycare centers. They published stories of child abuse in daycare centers, while ignoring the fact that most abuse of children took place in the family home.
The feminist backlash was most evident in the popular culture of the day. Movies such as Fatal Attraction embody the evil of feminism as it portrays an immoral woman destroying the life of a family man that she seduced. Conversely, television sitcoms such as The Cosby Show and Father Knows Best represented the value of a family unit guided by a strong male figure. (2) Feminist writers, at the same time, added to the backlash with a debate of their own. Some feminist writers supported the liberation theory of female behavior, while others stated that environment and culture guided female behavior.
In conclusion, the Reagan years and similarly the present Bush government represent a backlash against the policies of their predecessors. Reagan represented the conservative business elements that were portrayed as tax suppliers and those who use social programs as tax users. Reagan attacked these programs by cutting taxes, lowering minimum wage, deregulating industry, certifying unions, and promoting conflict between the poor and wealthy, native against non-native, and women against men. These policies in Reagan’s America led to the stock market crash in 1987 and the banking scandals where investors lost millions. Junk bonds, mergers and corporate takeovers combined with free trade led to the Mexicanization of the North American economy, where unions and reasonable wages were discouraged. In the end, Reagan used some regulations, “the very hand of the federal government that Reagan and the supply-siders had tried for seven years to destroy,” (3) to minimize the financial crisis that he created. The question remains whether the next president will dare to regulate the economy, or if this promise of regulations is just more of the same.
1. Watson, P. & Barber Benjamin: The Struggle For Democracy Toronto; Lester & Orpen Dennys Ltd., pp 211-212. (back)
2. Gordon, Colin: The United States in the Twentieth Century Vancouver; 1996. p 217. (back)
3. The Reagan Revolution: http://www.emayzine.com/lectures/1980s.htm (accessed 25 April 2002). (back)
“The Jewish ability to trade themselves to the center of power is impressive, but does it contain the seed of a truly universal outlook, or is it anchored in ethnic moorings that have succeeded in pulling off a coup par excellence that has taken the West by storm!”
I evolved the label
Anglo-American (Zionist) Finance Empire
long before I read The Saker’s term about
Of course, the word Jew is misleading. These days, I believe that the majority of people who say they are “Jewish” are the descendants of a people who converted to Judaism. Furthermore, I now believe that those people already previously had a reputation for being “namestealers.”
While the social facts are clearly the social factors, with regard to the relative over-representation of self-described “Jews” within the controllers of the mainstream media, as the mouths for the ruling classes, what I assert is it matters what people do, rather than who they are. Indeed, they primarily are who they are because of the history of what they did. Most importantly, nobody has a monopoly on the principles and methods of organized crime, although some groups, for some time, may well become the relatively best at applying those principles and methods.
I assert that there is only one political system, organized crime. It is extremely difficult to discuss that because the dominate group was always the dominate organized crime gang, which then got to dominate the languages used to discuss politics.
“Anglo-Zionists” became excessively successful through controlling governments to enforce their frauds. However, it was built into that system that it would eventually destroy itself, since endless exponential growth of debts is absolutely impossible.
“Anglo-Zionists … problem solving became the problem in the west.”
However, returning to a more multi-polar world is returning to more competing organized crime gangs in the world. Sovereignty is based on the power to rob. The ultimate power to rob is the power to kill. Russia’s reassertion of sovereignty is nothing less than that.
Of course, throughout “The West” the political situation is getting more and more surreal, because that public governments enforce frauds by private banks is the central political issue which is pretty well never discussed in any politically significant ways. In general, the funding of the political processes are dominated by less than 1% of the population, while 99% provide no significant funding of those political processes.
“The West” is a runaway fascist plutocracy juggernaut, as built and steered by the Anglo-American (Zionist) Finance Empire, which became based on automated electronic frauds, developing an about exponentially increasing fraudulence. The vicious feedback loops of the funding of the political processes are manifesting runaway criminal insanities. There is nothing within the Finance Empire (of Lies) which can fix itself, because there are no practical ways to fix the funding of the political processes within established systems.
Enforced frauds achieve symbolic robberies. The issues have become the excessive successfulness of having done that, and so, continuing to attempt to double down, yet again, and again. Indeed, that Anglo-Zionist Finance Empire was built on being able to enforce frauds, and so, more and more has the problem of attempting to solve its problems with ever more fraudulence.
Overall, that is the leading symbolic edge
of the integrated problems with respect to
OVERSHOOT IN A NUTSHELL
I believe that it is vital to remember that the ‘money’ made out of nothing as debts was used to ‘pay’ for strip-mining the planet’s natural resources as fast as possible. The series of short-term successes at doing that are accumulating to become a much greater longer term disaster.
The problems supposed to be resolved by Globalized Neolithic Civilization were created by that Civilization. In that context, it makes sense that the books of organized crime gang rules that survived through both the Egyptian and Mesopotamian phases of Neolithic Civilization would be the books of rules adopted by the “namestealers,” to become integrated with the previously biggest and best organized gangsters. In that context, it makes sense to shorten a political label referring to that as “Anglo-Zionist.”
However, the true problems to solve are how to develop better dynamic equilibria between the different organized crime gangs. I confess that I hope that Russia will be able to better do that. However, there can be no reasonable doubts that the overall situation is that Civilization is manifesting runaway criminal insanities, due to the excessive successfulness of applying the principles and methods of organized crime in the most dishonest ways possible.
The Great Depression was about money being too scarse. The farmers had to pay more and more – in terms of good produced – to handle their debt. Then they defaulted. Then the small banks defaulted.
All because of Monetary policy
What kind of Monetary policy was that? It was the austerity guys as Monetary policy. It was the Mike Maloney guys who were in charge, screaming: Money must be Gold.
Did FED print money during the Great Depression? What they did was too little too late.
The money printing came with WWII.
Yes, the first priority for new money made out of nothing as debts was to pay for warfare.
“…the business he’s in is ‘filled with unrealistic motherfuckers’…..”
Washington D.C. is crammed full of them.
How problem solving became the problem in the west!
While ever you run neocon neoliberal economics it will always be a problem! Prof. Hudson will you the breakdown
on the west global economic woes !!
Good article. I have pulp fiction and it’s one of my favorites. I’d trust a character like Marcellus Wallace over any politician. At least he doesn’t say that it’s for your own good. Gangsters are at least honest in their intentions.
A country where Pulp Fiction is considered “culture” is doomed. It is artful trash with satanic connotations, like the “works” by that horrid Abramovitch woman (provided she really is a woman, I wouldn’t bet on it). This trash is peddled as art, in a “culture” that cannot ostensibly produce proper art, and neither recognise it, since it lost its soul.
What happened to Chile when they reversed the Marxism of the 70-ties?
Milton Friedman in Chile
Latin America average GDP
Milton Friedman managed to improve GDP by 60% above average
What happened to US after New Deal? (Keynesianism)
Milton Friedman is from the Soros camp.
Pinochet was a fascist dictator:
The video link is dated 30? years ago, with no mentioning of Soros. At that time Soros was a trader on Wall Street.
“Soros camp” are those who funded Obama-Biden election. When there is talk about fake votes, think Soros.
Friedman is the 180% opposite of Soros and Hillary and OAC and left wing liberals.. Friedman will call Omabacare the biggest scam in history.
– Pinochet was a fascist dictator
Of course it was a nazi type coup in 1973, worse than fascism. Friedman was hired later to fix economy of Chile, where his theories could be tested.
Expect the Chinese to have keen interest in Chile 1980– as an economic model case for China.
I don’t know where the Chinese learned macro economy, it could be for Friedman …
With Friedman Venezuela today would have been the Libya of Latin-America?
Gaddafi was deeply interested in monetarist ideas of how to create an African currency.
And Gaddafi loaded up with Gold.
– What happened to US after New Deal? (Keynesianism)
Conroy promotes what was hardly more growth than growth of population in US 1930-1940.
Keynesianism, that is about public spending with moneyprinting, turned out of fashion after 30 years popularity
Greece 2000-2008 = Keynesianism with EU money
Then Greek public debt reached 170% of GDP.
Greece state invested in everything, roads, airports, housing …. they did not really need that much and lavish pensions ….
What happened in Friedman Chile was the opposite, private entrepreneurs invested, not the state
Originally, Putin articulated two political objectives for the military operation:
1. Keep Ukraine out of NATO and
2. Withdrawal of NATO military power back to its 1997 borders.
Will he liberate Europe from the American yoke?
Will he require ALL US forces to leave before he reopens the energy pipelines?
West bad, rest good. More specifically, human oppression and suffering is caused only by those labelled ‘Anglo’, American’ and ‘Israeli’. Sorry, I hear outdated, Godless, neo-Marxist smears and simplistic bigotry. The realm of the demonic, which uses for its mission any human vulnerable to its control, especially the self-righteous ideological or religious fanatic from any time or place, must love the camouflage provided by ignoring its existence, and by scapegoating entire peoples instead. This hides evil’s universal reality and its current most useful agents: the tiny globalist elite or Davos gang with unlimited funds and supremacist beliefs, a profound hate for mere nations and us ‘useless eaters’ overcrowding their world, and countless political, scientific, media and corporate minions who are busily turning the once-free West into their insane, technocratic, transhuman dystopia. We may agree that Putin sees at least some of this growing nightmare, as his speeches eloquently suggest. I certainly hope he does, and so won’t submit Russians to a local version of the New World Order.
Nice one Denis. Always straight to the point. And with an elegant pen. Good on you mate.
” “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” became the clarion call of muscular America in the service of promoting the United States of Americas’ dream of empire. “
One thing about MAGA is that it has never been a clarion call for American empire. In fact it is the very opposite! This statement shows the left liberals complete failure to understand American Populism which is isolationist and non interventionist at its core. Thats why the neocons, neolibs and progressives are so violently opposed to MAGA and The Orangeman.
For much too long so-called ‘experts’ have had the say on what goes and what doesn’t – so-called ‘experts’ whose field of ‘expertise’ promote those who pay them for their ‘expertise’. For a welcome change (long overdue) it is time to listen to those who struggle every single day, to take note of their suffering and needs brought about by the killer capitalistic system. It is time to end the white society hegemony.
Contrary to everything we read in Media, like “Russia Headed for One of Biggest Inflation Shocks in Decades”, Russia is facing deflation:
– Reshetnikov expects deflation in Russia in June
– ST. PETERSBURG. June 16 (Interfax) – Current trends in price dynamics render deflation an actuality in Russia for June, Economic Development Minister Maxim Reshetnikov told reporters on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) 2022.
“Deflation will be quite complete in June at these trends,” Reshetnikov said.
Reshetnikov said that two-thirds of the additional budget spending in early June has “settled” in deposits. “It is rather difficult to coax people to spend at these real interest rates,” he said.
– For the people of the US you must trade your fiat for hard assets if you want to have anything when the dust settles. Inflation is stealing what you have worked your whole life for. Consider holding -physical- gold, silver and other precious metals while they still may be found. Inflation and shortages are pushing the price and availability of food out of the reach of many families. Stock up on bulk food if you can find it. Have a way to store and purify water. Consider alternative energy, and a means of protection. Powell and the financial ‘masters of the universe’ have told you that you will own nothing and be happy. I assure you one thing-what they have planned for you will not make you happy. If you have laurels, do not rest on them. Like the ant, make provision now because the winter of our discontent has been planned for us. The admission of Jay Powell that the Dollar is no longer the worlds’ preeminent currency is like the telegraphing of a punch in the face that is smashing into our collective countenance.
Everything here is wrong? 1929-1933 was Gold pegged dollar -> deflation
The danger for Russia is Ruble being stronger and stronger.
As it is now, buying Ruble is like buying Gold.
As we can see here, whenever there is deflation there is a rescession.
Latest rescession was 2009 according to chart
Guess what, Ruble = Gold -> rescession