Inside story of the first Iran nuclear deal

by Pepe Escobar from Curitiba, Brazil – Posted with permission

This is the last of a three-part series from a world exclusive interview with Lula, the former Brazilian president, who remains in jail.

Lula on fights with Hillary, talks with Ahmadinejad, Obama ‘good but nervous and too young’

Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, left, with Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, center, and Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan celebrate the signing of a nuclear fuel swap deal in Tehran in May 2010. Photo: AFP / Wilson Pedrosa / Agenciia Estado

As we advanced past the first hour of a historic interview – see here and here – at a Federal Police building in Curitiba, southern Brazil, where Lula has been incarcerated for over 500 days as part of the lawfare endgame in a complex coup, former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva was on a roll.

“Let me tell you about Iran.”

He felt relaxed enough to start telling stories of political negotiation at the highest level. He had already set the context. Nuggets abounded – especially focusing on the sometimes rocky relationship between Brasilia and Washington. Here are only three examples:

1) On the overall relationship with the US: “People think that I’m angry at the Americans. On the contrary, we had a very healthy political relationship with the US, and that should be the case for Brazil. But to be subservient, never.”

Fights with Hillary

2) On dealing with George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton: “Bush accepted ideas with more fluidity than Obama. Obama was much tougher with Brazil. I’m certain that Hillary Clinton does not like Latin America, and she didn’t like Brazil. I had two big fights with her, one in a meeting in Trinidad-Tobago and another in Copenhagen [at the climate conference COP-15]. She arrived late, bossing everyone around. I said, ‘Lady, hang on. Wait for your turn. I’ve been here for three days.’ The petulance and arrogance of the Americans disturbs me, even if I think that the United States is always an important nation, and we should always maintain a good relationship.”

3) On hybrid war: “We tried to organize intelligence in the Air Force, the Navy, along with Federal Police intel, but among them there were some pretty serious fights. Whoever has intel has power, so no one wants to relay information to the competitor….  I imagined that after it was clear [from Edward Snowden’s revelations about National Security Agency surveillance] that … the United States was investigating Brazil … I imagined we would have a tougher position, maybe talking to the Russians and the Chinese, to create another system of protection. Our main political gesture was Dilma [Rousseff, then the Brazilian president] traveling to the US, but Obama, it seems to me, had very little influence.

Obama ‘too young’

“It was fantastic, Obama’s capacity to deliver beautiful speeches, but the next day nothing happened, nothing, nothing. I think the United States was too big for Obama, he was too young, too inexperienced. And you know that the US State Department is very powerful…. I think Obama was a good man. When I went to visit him the first time … I left with a lingering doubt: there was no one remotely similar to him in the meeting. I said to myself, ‘This guy has no one matching him here.’ And in our conversation, I said, ‘Obama, you may be the President of the United States who has the greatest possibility to effect change in this country. Because you only need to have the audacity that black people had to vote for you. The people have already granted you the audacity. Make the best of it.’… But then, nothing much happened.”

And that would set the scene for the inside story of the first Iran nuclear deal, clinched in Tehran in 2010 by Iran, Brazil and Turkey, and centered on a nuclear fuel swap, years before the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action reached in Vienna in 2015 by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, plus Germany.

History will register that as Donald Trump smashed the JCPOA, Hillary Clinton scotched the original deal less than 24 hours after it was clinched, calling instead for a new round of sanctions against Iran at the UN Security Council.

This is how I reported it for Asia Times. Lula, in early 2010, had already told Hillary in person it was not “prudent to push Iran against the wall.”

So what really happened in Tehran?

Meeting Khamenei, Ahmadinejad

“I was in New York. And [then Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad didn’t like me. He showed respect, but his preferential relationship here in the continent was with [Bolivian President] Evo Morales and my friend [Venezuela’s Hugo] Chavez… Then one day in New York, I decided to talk to Ahmadinejad, because he had said it was a lie that six million Jews had died. And then I said, ‘Look, Ahmadinejad, I came here because I wanted to know if it’s true that you said that the Jews want to be heroes because they died in the war. I wanna tell you something: The Jews did not die in the war. The Jews were victims of a genocide. They were not soldiers fighting. They were free men, women and children who were taken to concentration camps and killed, that’s different.’

“He said, ‘I know,’ and I said, ‘If you know, tell it to everyone, it’s not possible to deny that six million people were killed.’ … Well, during this conversation I said, ‘I’d like to go to Tehran to talk to you about the nuclear bomb. What do I want from you? I want you to have the same right that Brazil has. Brazil enriches uranium for scientific and peaceful purposes. I want you to do enrichment the same way as Brazil. But if there’s an atomic bomb, I’m against it.’

Iran’s religious leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks in Tehran on February 2019. Photo: AFP / Anadolu / Religious Leader’s Press Office

“Then I sent [Foreign Minister] Celso Amorim ahead, a few times. We cultivated a relationship with Turkey. It was something very funny. I met the great Ayatollah Khamenei, I had a meeting with him, I think he fell in love with me because I told him my life story. When I told him that I ate bread for the first time when I was seven years old, I thought, ‘I think I won this guy.’ He lavished extraordinary attention on us. We talked for over two hours. Then I left Khamenei and went to talk to the president of their congress; he looked like a czar. Then I went to dinner with Ahmadinejad, while Celso Amorim was negotiating with their prime minister.

“Ahmadinejad was not getting to the point, and I said, ‘Let me tell you something.’ And we had two interpreters: one who translated him into English, and Celso, who translated from English to me. I said, ‘You know that I’m here being bashed by the Americans. Hillary Clinton called the Emir of Qatar to tell me that I could not come, to tell me that I would be fooled. When I arrived in Moscow, [then-president Dmitri Medvedev said, ‘Hillary called, asking me to tell you not to go [because] the Iranians are liars.’ There was even a media joke: They were asking about the chance of a deal. Medvedev said ‘10%,’ and I said ‘99% – we are going there and we are going to do it.’

Obama nervous

“Then I arrived, I was sitting down with Ahmadinejad, and I said, ‘Hey, little guy [laughs], you know that I’m here, I’m losing my friends. Obama is nervous with me – Obama was the most nervous among them all, Angela Merkel does not want me to be here. The only one more or less favorable was [then-French president Nicholas] Sarkozy, and I came here because I think Iran is a very important country, not only from the point of view of your population but from the point of view of your culture. And I want Iran not to suffer the consequences of an embargo because an embargo is worse than war. In war, you kill soldiers. With an embargo you kill children, you kill people with serious illnesses.’

“It was already 10pm at night and I said, ‘I’m not leaving here without a deal.’ Up to this moment, there was no chance of a deal. Around midnight I was discussing things with my aides at the hotel. I was even imagining the headlines in Brazil, against my trip. Then Celso arrived at one in the morning and said, ‘There’ll be a deal.’

“Then we went there the next day, lots of talking, there was this guy who was an aide to Ahmadinejad and was always whispering in his ear, and Ahmadinejad demanded to change a word. So I told him, ‘Damn, get this guy outta here. Every time he comes here you change your mind.’ Then he said, ‘Lula, can we make a deal without signing it?’ And I said, ‘Nah…. Do you know what Sarkozy thinks about you? Do you know what Obama thinks about you? Do you know what Angela Merkel thinks about you? They all think Iranians are liars. So, in Brazil, we’ve got a thing called ‘black on white’. You gotta sign.’ So he agreed. We signed, Brazil, him [Iran] and Turkey.

Lula and US President Barack Obama, on left, meet with other leaders in Copenhagen in December 2009 at the COP15 Climate Conference. Photo: AFP

No talk, no deal

“I imagined I would be invited to the White House, or to Berlin by Angela Merkel…. So imagine my surprise when they were so nervous. You know that kid that goes to school, gets an ‘A,’ tells his mother and the mother thinks it’s a bad thing? I think they were pissed because Brazil could not possibly have achieved what they did not. They started to diss us, so what did I do? I took a letter that comrade Obama had sent, saying what would be good for the United States. And the Reuters news agency released Obama’s letter. And the letter was the same thing as the deal we clinched.

“It happened that Mrs. Hillary didn’t know about Obama’s letter…. Later, I was at a G-20 meeting, I approached Angela Merkel and said, ‘Have you talked to Ahmadinejad?’ I talked to Sarzoky, said, ‘Have you talked to Ahmadinejad?’ No. Approached Obama, said, ‘Have you talked to Ahmadinejad?’ ‘No.’ ‘Damn, how come you want a deal, but you don’t talk? You subcontract the negotiation? Then I understood that the world in the past had had leadership much, much more competent, left and right, people who knew how to discuss foreign policy.”

After hearing this story I asked Lula – the ultimate instinctive politician – if he felt Obama had stabbed him in the back: “No,” he replied. “I think, have you ever received a gift you didn’t know how to put it together?”

The Essential Saker IV: Messianic Narcissism's Agony by a Thousand Cuts
The Essential Saker III: Chronicling The Tragedy, Farce And Collapse of the Empire in the Era of Mr MAGA


  1. If there was a Rothschild-BRICS Zionist versus Trump/Jewish/Nativist fight for control of the Homo Globo New World Order, then Lula’s pending liberation and apparently authorized poltician blabbering means a deal has been struck. The signs are everywhere so lets see how much the bankers steal from the people this time around.

    I suspect de dollarization will proceed quite slowly, with the US losing only a share of global fiat but others moving to take their piece (China/EU/Russia) of an SDR pie. Mark Carney said much the same on a recent visit and speech to bankers in Wisconsin.

    Interesting that Holohoax tenets of faith will still be central to the new and improved NWO, as will be technocratic fascism and mind control hard, suggesting Lula is not a harbinger of something new but what was already planned many years ago.

  2. We receive from Lula his history of the 2010 Iran nuclear deal, and his critique of the major world leaders, who in essence did not “work” the deal.

    What we know about Obama, Merkel, Sarkozy, Medvedev is this makes sense. They are all feckless, vapid leaders.

    Half a decade later, they were able to carve out a JCPOA. But, by then, Putin was back in the Presidency and Xi was ruling China, with Russia, had pressured Iran with sanctions from the UN and assistance to help strengthen Iran’s economy.

    We can see the fecklessness of Merkel and the Europeans again as they spin their wheels while Trump dismantles JCPOA. Who is working hard to repair it? Russia and China. Putin and Xi.

    As for Brazil and the alchemy of Lula? Imprisoned. Left to tell his stories, but not allowed near the world cauldron where his “magic” can help stir a brew for peace and harmony. BRICS is dead since the coup and election produced Bolsonaro and jailed Dilma along with Lula.

    We can look forward to more of Lula’s stories, via Pepe. But, tragically, there will be no more leadership from the man.

    • Larch

      I really don’t think sanctions brought Iran to the negotiation table and much as been written by many analyst to dispel this notion, so I don’t want to beat a dead us.

      As for Russia and China joining the sanction regime at the UN back then they have only ended up shooting themselves in the foot by opening the pandora box. The same sanctions mentality is being applied against them now, talk of what goes around comes around. Now the Chinese and Russians are learning the hard way, it is cheap to use other nations as bargaining chip but such policy will eventually comeback to bite you because the hegemon recognise no ally but interest.

      • I don’t know what “many analysts” you read. Sanctions forced the deal. Iran had no alternative.

        Both Russia and China have been very consistent about working to stop nuclear proliferation everywhere.

        UN Sanctions are the only legal sanctions. US sanctions are illegal. They work because the US possesses hegemony since the fall of the USSR.

        The reason Russia and China are “coordinating for a New Era” is break the hegemony, which means the US sanctions will become toothless.

        If Iran had not cut a deal in 2015, the entire world would have acted to cut off the oil trade, revenues and vital imports to Iran. Ultimately, the issue for Russia and China was to get Iran out from under sanctions by using UN sanctions for a brief period while the JCPOA was negotiated. That became a great winner for Iran.

        Such a winner that Trump is determined to reverse it all.

        Russia and China want a stable, developing Iran. That’s what began with the JCPOA.
        Now China has had to move in and bankroll the modernization of the oil industry, thereby guaranteeing the supply of oil it requires from Iran. Russia provides military and Intel and diplomatic support to Iran.

        Normalizing Iran and its relationships with EU and Eurasia was the goal in 2013-2015. It continues under the new American Maximum Pressure efforts of renewed US sanctions.

        • No, Larchmonter, YK is right, the previous sanctions did not force Iran to the negotiating table for JCPOA. At the time, India broke the sanctions and kept on purchasing Iranian oil, in fact increasing their purchases and share (paying with gold, and later with a direct rupee/rial exchange mechanism). A good indicator is, is that today’s sanctions are much tougher than the previous sanctions (pre JCPOA) when both Russia and China teamed up with West to sanction Iran. Despite the current sanctions being much worse, Iran has adamantly refused to negotiate with West and even refuses to meet Trump. Since Iran has demonstrated the ability to tough it out in much harsher conditions, then they would not have caved earlier when even lighter sanctions were applied.