By Batiushka for The Saker Blog
‘I…believe that…our children (will) some day (be) citizens of the same worldwide country under a flag which shall be a quartering of the Union Jack with the Stars and Stripes’.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, The Noble Bachelor, 1887
Alexander Johnson, or to give him his full name, Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, was born to wealthy British parents in New York in June 1964, fifty years after the Sarajevo assassination in June 1914. Since 2019 Johnson has been the Prime Minister of the UK. Giving the impression of an elitist and snobbish aristocrat and distantly related to Queen Elizabeth II, he used to work as a right-wing journalist but is above all a renowned political opportunist. A man of the people he is not. Like so many other politicians, does he actually believe in anything, apart from in himself?
Johnson is a biographer of his idol, the half-American Winston Churchill, whom he appears to imitate in his stoop and gait. His fawning book The Churchill Factor, clearly indicates who his model is. He has five or six or seven children (he himself does not seem to be too sure how many he has fathered by various mothers) and enjoys drunken parties in Downing Street during and outside lockdowns. A highly divisive and controversial figure inside the UK, loved by a few and hated by most, the following quip is made about him:
What is the difference between Zelensky and Johnson?
Zelensky is a buffoon who became a politician, whereas Johnson is a politician who became a buffoon.
More serious commentators ask the question: Is Johnson a natural buffoon, or does he just pretend to be a buffoon? Or, perhaps most likely of all, is he a natural buffoon who pretends to be an even greater buffoon?
Of course, most people will admit that as regards Zelensky, he never became a politician, but remained a buffoon. But that is another story.
Despite his middle name of Boris (1), Johnson is a Russophobe to the core, as prejudiced as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (given his title because he defended the indefensible Boer War – see above) or any other old Imperialist. Like other blinkered representatives of the Norman-British Establishment, Johnson regurgitates the old Victorian (2) anti-Russian myths of ‘The Great Game’ as well as the new ones.
These latter include the 2006 poisoning of the British spy and traitor, Alexander Litvinenko (clearly not an act of the Russian secret services, who would have acted so as not to be identified), and the 2018 Skripal poisonings in the British Establishment military centre in Salisbury (and the subsequent censorship of the case and the father’s and daughter’s abductions carried out by MI5). These poisonings were due to a nasty substance to be found, perhaps uniquely on earth, at the highly secretive and evil Porton Down chemical weapons plant, just six miles from Salisbury. That MI5 and its SIS assassination arm (100 murders per year on average) with its many South African hirelings, could have been responsible would never be admitted by Johnson’s tiny mind.
Does Johnson not know that MI5 and MI6 are notorious for their underpaid and none too bright assets (liabilities?), among them moonlighting BBC correspondents. They are quite capable of making a fiasco of any cover-up, whitewash or false flag operation, like the recent British-Ukrainian farce in Bucha (a location chosen only because it sounds very much like the English word ‘butcher’). There a corpse miraculously got up and walked off as soon as he thought that the camera had passed by. Only it hadn’t.
However, Johnson is probably best known for Brexit. Since Tory Party grandees, backed by greedy industrialists and media hirelings, undemocratically forced the UK into the EEC/EU straitjacket in 1973, presumably it was only right that they should have freed the UK from it in 2020. The EU is a failed organisation anyway. But where does the UK go after the EU? Everyone remembers the sinister Dean Acheson’s words in 1962 that ‘Great Britain has lost an empire and has not yet found a role’. Sixty years later, in 2022, Johnson’s very belated initial answer after the UK-EU misfit divorce was ‘Global Britain’. After his recent humiliation in tentative trade talks in not surprisingly anti-colonial and not surprisingly pro-Russia India, possibly even he has at last realised that ‘Global Britain’, better known to history as ‘the British Empire’, is over….and, by the way, it didn’t work either…
So, fresh back from his Indian fiasco, Johnson announced his latest fantasy, reported in Italy on 27 May, which is an alternative to the EU. (Has he never heard of the British alternative to the Common Market of sixty years ago – EFTA? It too was a failure). Anyway, his latest harebrained scheme is a military and trade alliance, led by the UK of course, with the Ukraine, Poland, the Baltics and ‘perhaps later Turkey’. Like most of Johnson’s concepts, the concept is laughable. (Could that well-known genius Liz Truss, who wants the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation to be extended to the Pacific – one ocean is much like another, after all – have helped him think it up?).
Someone should tell Johnson that the Ukraine is bankrupt and no longer exists as such and that the combined population of the Baltics is only four million. This is because most of Latvia’s and Lithuania’s under 40s have been obliged to emigrate to paid slave labour in the EU in order to survive, after Germany had for peanuts bought up and then closed down their industries. (By the way, since the three Baltic States have no jet fighter planes, NATO stations there between four and eight fighters but, most frighteningly of all, Britain now has 1,700 troops and no fewer than 18 tanks to protect Estonia; clearly a huge threat to the one million strong Russian Army, its two million reserves and its 15,398 tanks). As for Poland, which always remembers how Britain first sold out Czechoslovakia in 1938, but then gallantly sent over its armed forces to protect it against the Nazi hordes in 1939, it has already made Polish into Britain’s second language anyway (3). What more is there for it to gain there? As for ‘perhaps later Turkey’, the Ottoman Sultan Erdogan has different ideas…..
Johnson is at best the blustering and stuttering buffoon in a comedy show starring a temporary Prime Minister of what can at best be called the DK, the Disunited Kingdom. Disunited because the thirty-year long anti-unity colonial war in Northern Ireland, with its 3,500 dead, ended nearly 25 years ago, because clearly there will at last be a long-delayed return to a United Ireland and justice. And Scotland will return to being an independent country, as it was before its ruling elite was bribed by the City of London to unite with England and Wales in 1707. Wales could then go the same way as Scotland.
From here on, home rule and so freedom for the much-tried 56 million people of England will see the long-awaited end to the 1066-imposed British Establishment, with its millennial Norman perfidy, and, at last, a democratic English National Parliament. Then a sovereign England could at last take its place as just another of the world’s quite ordinary 200 nations, and all quite superfluous Johnsonesque British Imperial pretensions put back where they belong, in the dustbin of history.
As Washington’s tousled, overweight blond poodle, the Manhattan-born Johnson barks around the USA, which duly keeps him busy by throwing him sticks to run after, which he is happy to do. But nothing new here, UK Prime Ministers have been eagerly running, panting, wagging their tails and bringing back saliva-covered sticks to their US masters. This has been so ever since the US occupation of the UK began seven weeks after Pearl Harbour (could that be a clue as to why it actually happened?) eighty years ago in January 1942, with the first of two million occupying US troops. Soon after that quite a lot of British people were manipulated into behaving like cowboys, watching US films, chewing gum, drinking coca-cola, eating junk food, wearing jeans, line-dancing and singing songs with American accents. It was clearly the beginning of the end, if we may contradict Churchill’s November 1942 remark.
But we have still not answered our question: Where are you going, Mr Johnson?
With the UK collapsing (not a question of if, but when), with the EU collapsing (not a question of if, but when), with the USA collapsing (not a question of if, but when), amid the birthpangs of the new multipolar world, brought about by the West through its tragic catspaw of the collapsing Ukraine, we ask: Quo vadis, the Western world?
Whatever your bluster, Mr Johnson, the fact is that we are all heading for a New World Order, and it is not the one that you and the top-dog elite have been dreaming of. It is the one that was in your nightmares, the one where you are no longer a poodle, but where your master is the poodle. And as for you, perhaps you have more in common with Zelensky than you thought – exile to a gilded cage for buffoons in Florida beckons. Yanks and CIA assets, go home. Yes, and take all the would-be Yanks, traitors and nuclear weapons together with you, we do not want them littering and polluting our shores.
Oh, and don’t bother to leave us your number. Newly-freed Europe, from the Atlantic to the Urals, will not be calling you. We are busy, off to a café in Vienna to plan our future common European home, trade and security in the new Confederation of Sovereign Europe, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Helsinki, Stockholm, Warsaw, Prague, Vienna, Budapest, Bucharest, Athens, Berlin, Paris, London, Madrid and Rome, the one we lost in 1914, remember? Goodbye forever, Mr Johnson. Enjoy the gangsters in Miami.
1. Johnson was given the middle name of Boris because of a Russian émigré family friend.
2. There is a curious Russian naming connection between Alexander Boris Johnson and Queen Victoria. Queen Victoria’s first name was actually Alexandrina, so called after her godfather, the victor over Napoleon, Tsar Alexander I of Russia. However, on account of her acute Russophobia, she preferred to use her middle name Victoria. Thus, the Victorian Age should have been called the Alexandrinan Age, after the Russian Tsar. Moreover, in a curious turn of destiny, Victoria’s favourite grand-daughter was also called Alexandra. She was Tsarina Alexandra, the last Tsarina of Russia, murdered after the British-orchestrated show of the February 1917 palace revolt in Saint Petersburg ‘went wrong’ and Zionist Marxists like Lenin and Trotsky were sent from the Western world and took over from bungling Anglophile Russian aristocrats. Thank you again, MI6, for your brilliant meddling, planning and foresight.
3. https://www.ukpopulation.org/england-population/. By the way, the Ukraine’s second language is Ukrainian.
I’m originally from the UK and can confirm that this is bang-on accurate. Brilliant stuff.
And as for the future Batiushka outlines? Let it be so.
The going-ons in the west I.e., USA and EU, NATO reminds me of the fall of Rome from the bringing in of immigrants and hired soldiers, to stabilize the Roman world, to the insanity of political leadership actions, right up until the last day as an empire. We are watching history repeat in cycles.
Emmett, I have to totally concur with you on your very astute observation. The insanity of the last days of this satanic Anglo-Zionist empire is “something to behold”! The big problem is, unlike Romans, they have nukes.
Well done. I would prefer more laser-focus on Zionists, banking elites, and Neocons. After a long infiltration, America was decapitated with the Israeli assassination of JFK.
So, is Biden Caligula, or his horse?
Caligula’s horse’s arse.
Exactly so pasha.
It’s great to see an author not just acknowledge the importance of the Norman invasion but to emphasize its ongoing influence.
The chaos and suffering we see about us is the legacy of that great Anglo-Norman gift to the world – liberalism.
Well, Boris played a clown deliberately since his school days. But he was not dumb. Read his Dream of Rome. I believe that something weird happened when he was admitted to the NHS hospital under the covid pretext, he change even his looks. And final blow was that young lady of his and another parenthood. Now he behaves like a crazy guy under commands of his GF, a wine cellar or whatever. Perfect combo with Truss me I am a diplomat, a real mad cow.
OT During The Great War the British royal family kept his original name till 1917, when got renamed to sound very English
You honestly believe BoJo wrote that book ? Ghost Writers come pretty cheap
Whatever his other failings, Johnson is a talented and hard working writer. So yes.
DO NOT mistake him for his father, a real author!
JFK of the Kennedy Clan, had the same reputation as a “hardworking, talented writer”; it is amazing what “image” can be bought and polished in these times!
Wasn’t he fired by the Times for plagiarising articles?
If it takes talent and hard work to cheat and lie, BloJo has it in spades.
The Polanski movie “Ghost Writer” illustrates the perils of a writer determined to find out the truth.
The movie was a thinly disguised expose of Tony Blair, but no doubt Johnson has many of the same hidden “roots”.
The Boer War was a moral disgrace, Britain at its worst. And by the way, the City of London is not what many think of as London. That is Westminster. (or City of Westminster)
A peculiar feature of both Rome and Britain is that both societies had at their core an alien group that ran things with some deference to the local population. And both put together very extensive empires.
City of London is a Corporation, it’s ‘Remembrancer’ sits at Westminster’s Speakers side, un-elected.
It is from the Venetian Fondi, who moved first to Amsterdam, then London, in other words the Second Rome.
Gibbons’ Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire is the blueprint. The Monarch is a Doge, the Privvy Council from the Venetian Committee of 10.
For a time the Soviet entertained a Third Rome strategy during the most dangerous Cold War build-up.
Is there a book that sheds a light on the origins and shenanighans of “The City of London” ?
There doesn’t seem to be, but you might want to check out this thread: https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1198312/pg1
Shaxson has 2 books, and this documentary:
The Spider’s Web: Britain’s Second Empire | Documentary Film
Webster Tarpley is an expert on the Venetian roots.
Documentary also features Michael Hudson at 37min. A full overview with video of the City is also included.
It is fatally naive to think this financial empire is BoJo.
Absolutely brilliant presentation. And “thanks” to Dr. Michael Hudson who has seen it all, been there when this whole system attained its mastery!!.
X: “For England to preserve to herself the balance of power in Europe, it is necessary to limit the political and territorial expansion of any European state.”
the city of London. The colossal political and financial organization
centered in this area, known as “The City,” operates as a super-government of the world; and no incident occurs in any part of the world without its participation in some form.
[ At the end of World War I, the writer, then 27 years old, was released from the U. S. Army as a second lieutenant of the Coast Artillery Corps. Like many more servicemen, he was filled with resentment as the deluge of utterly obvious and brazen falsehood, by which participation in that war had been forced upon the American people, was exposed, and became more evident day by day after the war was won.
a very old book
the Empire of “The City”: The Secret History of British Financial Power
by Edwin C. Knuth
No. The City of London Corporation is far older than that. It has its origins in the Norman invasion of England.
Few people understand that the real reason for the Magna Carta had nothing whatsoever to do with human rights, but to protect the City of London Corporation from Royal interference.
The City is from Venice, who funded the Normans and the Crusades.
Follow the money. See my documentary link.
bonbon; So lets detail the history here. The City of London Corp has its origins in the Norman invasion of 1066.
The Magna Carta was for the purpose of protecting it from the Crown. But going even further back you say the City of London Corp derives from Venice and the Doge. Right? If so this is where it gets really interesting.
Venice had a bourgeois Merchant constitution. But the tell is what created Venice? Its system of power that is. Venice is where the Oligarchs of the Roman Empire fled to in order to escape from the “barbarian” hordes that finally overthrew the Roman Empire. By that time the Roman Oligarchs had so exploited the people to the point where they welcomed the invaders to save them from their own “Elites.”
So the historical lineage is as follows Roman Empire and its exploitative Oligarchs, which escaped to Venice and eventually set up the Venetian power structure. (What was the role of Jews in Venice?) Venice established a Mercantilist capitalist constitution. Which funded the Norman conquest of England and set up the City of London Corp.
So we get an unbroken chain of patriarchal class driven power extending from Rome to Venice and then the Normans and finally the City of London. The forms of the power structures are fundamentally the same.
Therefore the fall of the City of London is the real and final fall of the Roman Empire and its Gods of Power.
The Corporation of the City of London is even older than the Normans. It was the Aldermen of the City that opened the city gates for William the Bastard.
Gibbon’s book is of the worst historical trash ever written.
Here is the original Italian leak :
Il piano segreto di Boris Johnson per dividere l’Ucraina da Russia e Ue: il Commonwealth europeo
This looks like the archaic Hapsburg Intermarium on steroids, or a shriveled British Commonwealth! What could possibly go wrong!
After Brexit, replace the EU – wow! The real question is – does the EU Commission play along?
Strangely, Italy had recently tried a new Ukraine treaty idea, which looked like Minsk III.
It looks like some in Rome (Tremonti, and-or the Pope?) have had enough of the Britannia Boys – named after the infamous Royal Yacht Britannia meeting in 1992.
Minsk III will be this — you will get your Ukraine visa and other traveling papers from the Russian embassy. And it may take a while, as the embassy is understaffed and overworked.
Brilliant. The author knows Britain well, and tells it like it is. Britain as an occupied colony of America with most of its inhabitants happily aping the Americans and glorying in their bad habits of exceptionalism, indispensability, and superiority. The English language has now decayed with the common, filthy, American tongue now commonplace. Gone are the Latin niceties of the Norman French conquerors that displaced the old ‘Anglish’ of the peasantry.
I thoroughly enjoyed reading this article and to know, ‘I am not alone’.
Spot on. It’s a shame our MSM is so corrupt they cannot write analysis like this. The fact is BoJo doesn’t give a damn about the country or its citizens it’s all about how much money he and his corrupt cabinet can obtain for themselves. In this regard, he has everything in common with Zelensky. There can be no doubt that that the last Election in the UK was seriously rigged by the CIA, MOSSAD, MI5, MI6 and the Government. In Jeremy Corbyn (who I think is our President Putin in that he has integrity, honesty, honour and truth) we lost the best Prime Minister the UK never had. Starmer is utterly corrupt and, in my view, a former lifelong Labour voter but not while Starmer is head of the Party, the Liberal Democrats stand for nothing and the Greens well, look at Habek and Baerbook in Germany, who would want them anywhere near national politics, they are an obsessive one issue Party. However, as I am a bit of a Barfly, the mood here in the UK is definitely changing. People are beginning to express real anger at what is happening to the country. Many of who are in the bracket to lose their homes if the interest rates rise any further. I know the Sheeples here are so dumbed down by the MSM they cannot think for themselves but, I can hear dissent starting to rumble, quietly, in pubs. It might be a long way from a revolution (I’m banking on the French to lead the way as they have a very well organises active resistance network) but, you know, once the idea takes hold in the UK, it will grow, albeit slowly. I hope and pray. BoJo has had his day.
The problem is not just Billy Bunter Johnson,its the whole bloody rotten system,as you will know he was in the Bullingdon club at University,well those entitled morons liked smashing up restaurants after too much drinking,burning £50 notes in front of homeless people,this is the filth masquerading as Prime Minister,if anyone need to know what the establishment/deep state were capable of just look at what they did to Corbyn who ws the best hope for the Country in my life,i believe if he had been elected and carried out what he believed in the deep state would have assassinated the man,another problem is the weaponised level of ignorance among many of the population.
Hello Englishman, wholeheartedly agree with you. This is the most corrupt Govt in UK parliamentary history it is a disgrace to our Nation as is the filth we call our MSM. People say well, if they get rid of Bojo is there anyone to take his place? I say yes, I remember a group of 100 Tory Backbenchers who got together to challenge and put a stop to the Covid restrictions. They put the Nation’s interest in some ways, before their own at this point. I don’t understand why say, someone like Steve Baker doesn’t stand as a candidate. I don’t agree with everything he says but he did talk a lot of sense about Covid and was willing to take a principled stand. There are other candidates there but they need to coordinate. This country badly needs a Government, which Corbyn would have given us, that genuinely cares about its citizens and puts their well being first and foremost, not their own. I know I am utterly aghast at the industrial levels of propaganda, censorship and absolute lies being put out by the MSM, I have never known it so bad, ever. I am sick and tired of being lied to.
Bismarck knew well how Britain played, saying on his last day on the job, they will start a 7-year war.
Britain’s King Edward VII did indeed get his 2 nephews Wilhelm and Nikolas to start WWI with Wilhelm belatedly cottoning on. That King was then a few years dead already.
Edward VII’s Mackinder wrote Geopolitics, word for word translated by Haushofer for Hitler, Russia being the target.
So when BoJo leaks a European Commonwealth ‘idea’ it would be really dumb to play an idiotic aristocrat Kaiser Wilhelm, and be destroyed.
BoJo certainly did not conjure this up, nor Truss – this is policy.
Germany is obviously targeted again for de-industrialization, that 2 World Wars did not manage.
Is Chancellor Scholz doing a Kaiser Wilhelm act – that is the question!
This article has opened some eyes for me. Spasibo bol’shoye, Batyushka.
This could be a game changer
First time any middle class magazine in the UK has actually told the truth. Will it change the narrative or will the Empire of lies keep denying the obvious ?
Thatcher started the lies with their is no such thing as state money only tax payers money. Only complete fools fell for it. Boris continues to lie about it today.
And now in the Empire of lies we have the FED . US Federal Reserve Bank economists going Marxist on us.
Finally admitting the labour market isn’t a ‘fair game’ as labour has to work to eat, while business only hires if it likes the profit potential. So without some sort of support, real wages gravitate towards subsistence levels.
Which all of us knew all along.
Are neoliberalism days coming to an end ?
Your last 3 paragraphs look pretty Marxist to me.
US Federal Reserve Bank, no way!
“They are quite capable of making a fiasco of any cover-up, whitewash or false flag operation, like the recent British-Ukrainian farce in Bucha (a location chosen only because it sounds very much like the English word ‘butcher’).”
They even screwed that up, because for some reason Westerners are pronouncing Bucha as if it was Polish (“Bukha”).
The British should stop being an US subsidiary and start to act and work as an independent and european country. It is a shame!!!!
If someone had told me 20 years ago that Boris & Bono were a semi-professional wrestling tag-team, a comedy double act, share the same values (MI6/City of London ) and would share the flight to bolster the Spirits of Kiev, then as someone who knows odds very well, I’d have lost the shirt on my back.
Yet, when you think about it carefully, Ireland’s troubles/woes have been created by Boris’s ilk and Ireland’s English collaborators have helped sell the country down the drain. Batiushka touches/references on Scotland being sold to the City of London by a handful of filthy traitorous landed gentry for personal gain/riches, brilliantly captured by Scotland’s most favourite poet, philosopher and man of the people Robert Burns in his poem (a must read ) – What A Parcel of Rogues in a Nation.
While VV Putin & Generals juggle 4 Chessboards, Boris the Court Jester and his Motley Crew of Banking Cronies juggle 4 Cheeseboards.
Great article by Ukrainian Peace Activist.
Great to see that not everyone is brainwashed.
Recall that BoJo’s Grandfather on his father’s side was Osman Kemal – a big shot in Ottoman Empire. (also note that the Osmans didn’t consider themselves lowly Turks but some kind of uberTurks). Also recall that BoJo’s Great-grandparents on the Mother’s side were Lithuanian Jews who emigrated to New York (Elias Avery Lowe)
Imagine with that background trying to fit into English High Society. So…he’s kinda really mentally f’d up trying to be a real Englishman.
In the good old days, we’d describe the family as ‘opportunists’.
Osman Kemal was his great grandfather I think and he was a journalist who was assassinated because he wrote what he believed was right for Turkey.
I agree in no way is he a standard upper crust Englishman or even a standard Tory.
You are thinking of Ali Kemal the interior minister (great grand father )
so where does that ridiculous thatch of straw that passes for hair come from????
i mean dna-wise?
I am no lover of Boris but it is wrong to repeat the mantra that he is some sort of spoilt rich kid. His father was an international civil servant which is probably the only reason he could pay for private schools. For the rest he was what was known in my youth as a scholarship boy and made his way by his own efforts through winnig just that scholarships. He is also a very left wing conservative.
His real family name is Kemal but his grandfather’s name was changed to Johnson during WW1 because he was living in England and Turkey was on the side of the Germans.
The answer to the question is that he is very bright and pretends to be a buffoon. His extraction of the UK from the Brexit quagmire was nothing short of brilliant. In that he is more like Disraeli than Churchill. But the tragedy is that he seems totally bought and paid for by the Neocons in the US just when Britain needed someone capable of taking a more balanced view to set Britain on the road to good relations with the rising powers in the East and Asia.
As it is we are trapped as chief poodles to the US. Having said that there is no sign that any other UK politician would behave any differently.
Are you having a laugh? no other UK politician would behave any differently,try Corbyn,thats why the Deep State threw the kitchen sink at him.
True but what I should have written was no other politician likely to be Prime Minister would behave any differently.
Yeah Corbyn was/is too much of a humanitarian, a gentleman, who would have made life difficult for CIA operations in the UK.
If there is a powerful interest that is not disclosed, and they can, they will get the visible guy in power who best suits their purpose. The neo-Nazis are probably why they have a Jew as the head of the Ukraine. It makes it seem unlikely that he would support a Nazi movement. In the US it is apt to be a black guy. Go after him and they charge racism.
I suppose if the plot is complicated it helps to have somebody who seems a little stupid, not the obvious choice for a complex operation. Or Boris Johnson or Bill Clinton, rags to riches everyman at the head. And then there is Hillary Clinton. Safely corrupt, she is not going to turn virtuous once in power.
stanley was mi6 and mossad an agent of the city of london
a long line of donmeh that was his dad his mom ashkanazim
boris mk ultra child project deconstruction agent frankfurt school
a few words from churchill another bankers agent
…the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all of them, have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”
“By the way, the Ukraine’s second language is Ukrainian.”
Absolutely correct. All those maps that claims to represent the percentage in each province who speak Russian or Ukrainian at home are false.
Until last September, I had been in various cities of Ukraine – Odessa, Kharkov, Kiev, Vinnytsia, Lviv and Nikolaev – for a total of 2 years. I heard Russian being spoken in all the shops. Maybe Ukrainian is only spoken in Lviv and the countryside. I have no idea.
Ukrainian is a country bumpkin dialect of Russian. It’s laughable to treat it as a independent language.
A parallel would be the Austrians or Swiss saying they don’t speak German
Informative article. Several historical tidbits caught me unawares. I’ll double check the accuracy.
First time I see Lenin characterised as a “Zionist”. Where is the justification for that, any sources?
Humorous, accurate and focused. Thanks for a good post to this thread…
pleasure to read a piece that is both knoledgeable and full of humor well written etc
enjoyed it lots
In a nod to your point on second languages. Language experts have said that the most understood language in Ukraine is Russian. Something in the range of 82-86% of people in Ukraine understand and can speak Russian.In the South and East 84-92% of the population speak Russian as their language,depending on the area. In Central and North Ukraine the numbers using Russian drops to 26-56% depending on which area. It’s only in West Ukraine that the numbers drop to 5-10% of the population using Russian.That’s why the Natsik dream of a “pure” Ukraine of Ukrainian speaking people,is just that,a dream.Made even more a dream today with the SMO liberating so much of Ukraine from the Kiev Natsik regime.
It’s not a separate language.
I’m repeating what others have said, but this is a brilliant and well written piece. Bravo!
I would say this is the wrong way around. The Anglo-American empire is a large part of the NWO but it’s power base isn’t in Washington. It’s in the City of London and the Royal Estates. Why do you think Clown Prince Charlie is so friendly with Klaus and the Rothschilds? In fact the Queen’s private bankster is none other than Mr. Rothschild himself.
Lincoln was taken out by the the British banksters let us not forget. The entire American Empire is based on British Freemasonery. Just look at the design of Washington DC. The British took control of the US a while back. How do you think they were able to con the Americans in to three world wars?
No, just like the Devil who made billions believe he didn’t exist, the British royals have done an exemplary job of convincing you they are just figureheads. Far, far from it. They are members of the Committee of 300 and should never be underestimated. The British East India Company never disappeared. It just re-badged itself and migrated and mutated.
Bozo the clown is just one of any number of buffoons who fronted for the powers behind the curtain. Even Disraeli and Gladstone referred to it. They weren’t talking about the US either.
I am in agreement with you, Kevin. The sweet trick is to take the public eye off of the ball, or “Hide the pea under which of the three walnuts.”
The Rhodes Trust has been among the most active of the faceless powers in supporting the Brutish Empire’s continuity and expansion since the early 1900s. Their mission melded nicely (of course!) with the British (Rothschild) banking establishment with its well-developed bonds across Europe and elsewhere in the world.
The Brits’ confluence with Rockefellers’ Council on Foreign Relations and their formation of the OSS-CIA is a connection that has only grown stronger with The five Eyes and to whatever level of extent with Mossad. It’s just not that easy to know the depths of cooperation and limitless perfidy that these associations entail; but it’s easy enough to rest assured their connections are firm.
What a convoluted clusterf**k we are living in.
For long time i have tried to find similarities between ego of BoJo and Mr Churchill. So let us put aside all the hype of Winston and just read what people of his (Churchill’s) time said about him.
1) Lord Esher, 1917:
“He (Churchill) handles great subjects in rhythmical language, and becomes quickly enslaved to his own phrases. He deceives himself into the belief that he takes broad views, when his mind is fixed upon one comparatively small aspect of the question.”
2) Robert Menzies (who was the Prime Minister of Australia):
“His real tyrant is the glittering phrase—so attractive to his mind that awkward facts have to give way.”
3) Charles Masterman:
“He is the slave of the words which his mind forms about ideas. And he can convince himself of almost every truth if it is once allowed thus to start on its wild career through his rhetorical machinery.”
I’m not sure is BoJo man of war or man of peace. Opportunist he is like Churchill who lacked any grasp of the fundamentals of the social philosophy of classical liberalism. In particular, he never understood that the true story of the human race is the extension of social cooperation and the division of labor. Peace, not war, is the father of all things.
When it comes to elite of UK and US Churchill is their god. In fact he was politico without principle, whose apotheosis serves to corrupt every standard of honesty and morality in politics and history.
With these ideas we should focus the mindset of BoJo, the Prime Minister of country Churchill actually sent to downhill.
Thank you for this. Very interesting.
“Zionist Marxists like Lenin or Trotsky”. Can you elaborate on that? Because on the surface it makes no sense whatsoever. One of the biggest theoretical contributions of Lenin was that he pointed out the intrinsic link between capitalism and colonialism, recognizing the importance of uniting the anti colonial movement with the workers’ movement in the capitalist countries. By contrast, Zionists are neither anti capitalist nor anti colonialist
Mateus: You write “on the surface it makes no sense whatsoever.”
There is a tendency to say that the Bolshevik revolution was all the work of Jews. This is a big conversation for some people. And a ready to hand simple explanation for the whole affair. Clearly Jews were very well represented in the Bolshevik movement. From there a logical leap is made. The revolution itself was driven by Jewish motivation. That is a judgement currently attractive to Russian Orthodox, and difficult to avoid, for they understandably feel victimized by the Red terror. Then comes the explanation for Jewish motivation. Hidden Zionism. I agree Trotsky was a Jew who eventually betrayed the revolution for reasons of his own Jewish egoism. So Stalin had to put him to bed. So from this line of reasoning we get the Soviet Revolution was really a Jewish conspiracy against Russia. And the Jewish motivation could only be Zionist. Ergo its leaders were all Jewish Zionists, or working in concert with them. Hence Lenin, who was Russian, is now cast as a Zionist. Do you see the logic?
My sense of it is more that the Soviet Jewish militants embraced a spectrum of motivations. Some being sincere and committed socialists albeit with a Jewish mentality. Many others however clearly fell into the usual Jewish sins of racial exclusivity etc. This is the piece that is getting emphasized now.
This gets reinforced by the statement that Karl Marx was a Jew. Therefore Marx was doing the hidden work of the Jewish zionists. Marx’s father converted from Judaism to Christianity and embraced the Enlightenment. The labelling of Marx as just another Jew conspirator leaves out the real truth of Marx. He saw himself as a Christian and fiercely condemned the Jewish project in his own writing. If we are going to characterize Karl Marx as a Jew we would have to say he was really what we today call a “wise Jew” who could see right through their bullshit and wrote about it. But it helps some people to simplify all this stuff and just run the whole thing uncritically on “the Jews” – hence wicked Zionists.
So goes the popular tale.
Marx was primarily a philosopher, whose unsurpassed contribution to the understanding of history is found right at the beginning of his book “The Communist Manifesto,” written together with Engels:
《 The history of all society up to this point is the history of class struggles.》
Without placing the analysis of historical reality (including that of the present) under the optics of the Class Struggle, everything will seem obscure, confusing and indecipherable.
Hence distorted views emerge, making individuals the agents of History, taking mere supporting actors as protagonists and bringing accessory conspiracies to the foreground.
This is how the Socialist Revolution of October 1917 becomes a coup orchestrated by the West, being carried out by “Jews” to destroy the Russian Empire.
And what would be “Jews”?
Just a useless concept, because the Jews do not form a homogeneous totality. Quite the contrary, as history itself teaches us, starting with the irreconcilable difference between Askhenazim and Sepharadim.
No society is homogeneous, even more so under capitalism. All are divided into classes. There are also divisions, and therefore a struggle for economic and political hegemony, even within the ruling class.
Russia is far from being an exception. There is much more proximity between a Brazilian worker and a Russian soldier fighting in Ukraine, than between the latter and a Russian oligarch.
He admirers Winston Churchill does he?
Well, Churchill was a degenerate, war-loving, pervert who never met a war he didn’t like. And he never came up with a single military strategy that saw any success.
However, his alternative plans for the Normandy invasion on D-Day was in fact superior to the ones the Allied generals developed. Only problem was, Winston was ignored…
As a fifteen-year-old – some fifty-five years ago – I stood outside polling stations handing out SNP voting cards.
Now we have a bunch of fascist Scottish Nationalists promising independence by joining the European Union.
Great! Some Independent Country that will be!
There is more than a smidgeon of truth regarding the 1066 Norman Establishment – but how far back would you like to go. What about the Roman Establishment?
Britain has been inextricably mixed for the last 300 years, breaking it down, even to the extent of regional governments in England, is now a well-known part of the globalist agenda. No freedom to be found down that path, putting Mel Gibson aside for now.
Don’t bother, my friend. These bellends (I include the author) know nothing whereof they speak. The sheer bullshittery about our island(s) is astounding, but given the current high emotions aroused over the military operations in the Ukraine is understandable though unforgivable. Btw, I coined the phrase Disunited Queendom; you would expect a shameless plagiarist to get it right.
A proud Briton.
If you were being completly honest with yourself — How could you possibly call yourself “A proud Briton” ?
I was born in Belfast but luckily my parents left N.Ireland when I was 8 for a far away country. So I was born with a British Stamp on my passport — Not renewed !
Having as an older adult read the true history of the UK – -I can only want NO part of that 5 eyes Country !
Is Boris Johnson like Vladimir Zelenski?
I am shocked that British TV has such rank antisemitism:
There has never been a united Ireland so that part is just a cheap shot.
Let me remark that the poisoning of Kim Jong-Nam (Kim Jong-Un’s brother) in Malaysia is also the work of british secret services.
Great article about the PM of the UK ,real flow including politics, history, analysis and marvelous humour all wrapped up in a neat bundle!
RT has articles revealing UK intentions to send Ukraine the heavier rocket systems that the US says it won’t supply, (“to avoid escalation”)
RT also has an article suggesting that Biden is planning to send Ukraine attack drones which can carry up to eight hellfire missiles.
The dynamics of the situation are crystal clear. The West will carry on and on, sending more weapons of increasing lethality because they are not facing any downside, It will only stop when Russia provides the necessary consequences. The sooner the better, for everyone.
I cannot provide links because browser access to RT is blocked; I access RT via the RT app.
There has to be feedback to change the direction of events.
Brilliant. I am from UK. Wales. This is spot on. One of the best articles I’ve read in the past 2 years. In the words of Brian Gerrish (of UK column news)’Don’t be fooled by Johnsons bumbling buffoonery. He can be ruthless.’
BoJo and Zelensk? No big difference. When drunk, they both find it funny to play the piano with the dick.