Distinguished Mr. President,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Last December, the UN General Assembly adopted the resolution on “Promotion of a democratic and equitable international order”, which clearly stipulated the inadmissibility of interference into internal affairs of sovereign States, non-recognition of coups d’état as a method of change of power and the need to exclude from the international communication the attempts of unlawful pressure of certain States on others, including exterritorial application of national jurisdiction.
The prevailing majority of Member States of this Organization voted in favor of this resolution. The countries that, despite the goals and principles of the UN Charter, are trying to dominate in global affairs and impose models of development, as well as their own ‘values’ on States and peoples, guided by the logic of unipolarity that undermines the international law, turned out to be outvoted.
Nevertheless, the world keeps changing. It is gratifying to note, as the U.S. president Donald Trump unequivocally stated from this podium last Tuesday, that:it is important to comply with the principles of sovereignty in the international affairs; it is necessary to ensure leadership by example and not impose one’s will on other nations; the countries with different values, cultural patterns and aspirations can not only coexist, but also work hand in hand on the basis of mutual respect. I believe that anyone can sign under these words, especially, if the U.S. foreign policy is conducted precisely on this basis.
Sovereignty, refraining from interference into internal affairs, equality of people and mutual respect – Russia has always adhered to these principles and will continue to uphold them. For the last quarter of a century, Russia, no matter the challenges it faced, made in good faith its part of the way to eliminate the legacy of the Cold War, has done a lot to strengthen confidence and mutual understanding in the Euro-Atlantic region and the world. This, however, has not been reciprocated by our Western partners, overexcited by the illusion of the ‘end of history’ and still trying to accommodate rudimentary institutions of block-to-block confrontation era to the modern day realities. NATO aspires to recreate the Cold War climate and refuses to bring to life the principle of equal and indivisible security across the OSCE area, solemnly declared in the 1990s.
The West structured its policy according to the principle of “who’s not with us is against us”, having chosen the path of reckless eastward NATO expansion and provoking instability in the post-Soviet space and encouraging anti-Russian sentiments. This policy is precisely the root cause of the protracted conflict in South-Eastern Ukraine. Despite the efforts being undertaken in the Normandy format and the Contact Group, Kyev invents more and more tricks to bog down the implementation of its obligations on implementing the Minsk Package of Measures of 12 February 2015, endorsed by the UN Security Council.
But even under those circumstances Russia is aiming at constructive work and the search for mutually acceptable ways to implement the Minsk agreements. In response to the expressed concerns regarding the current state of affairs in the field of security, President Vladimir Putin launched an initiative to establish the UN Mission for the protection of OSCE observers in Donbass. A relevant draft resolution has been tabled in the UN Security Council. We hope that the Russian proposal will facilitate the settlement of the internal Ukrainian crisis that broke out as a result of the anti-constitutional coup perpetrated by the ultra-radicals. We are looking forward to constructive interaction on those issues with our European and US partners, without zero-sum games.
Being here, at the UN headquarters, we must not forget about the origins of the United Nations. The rulings of the Nuremberg Tribunal served as a warning against leaving in oblivion the lessons of World War II and the disastrous consequences of the attempts to rule the destinies of the world by trampling lawful interests of other nations and peoples. It is an outrage to use one’s concern for freedom of expression as an excuse to condone radical movements that profess neo-Nazi ideology and stand up for heroization of Nazis and their associates. Consistent efforts are required to put a secure shield against neo-Nazism, revanchism, extremism and xenophobia, and enhance international and intercultural harmony.
By instigating hatred and intolerance, terrorists, extremists and nationalists destroy and desecrate the objects of historic, religious and cultural value. Civilized Europe tolerates the demolition of monuments to the liberators of the continent and heroes of WWII whose victory laid the foundation of the United Nations. We deem it necessary to pay without delay a priority attention to this issue at the UN General Assembly and UNESCO in order to provide for corresponding legal framework to prevent of such actions. Russia intends to submit relevant proposals.
It is inadmissible to remain indifferent to either the shameful phenomenon of non-citizenship persisting in Europe, or the suppression of minority languages in violation of the Conventions of the Council of Europe.
Throughout the ages, world history has proved that the lasting settlement of disputes is possible only through dialogue and finding the balance between basic interests of conflicting parties. Unfortunately, blatant pressure, instead of diplomacy, is more and more prevailing in the arsenal of a number of Western countries. The application of unilateral sanctions, above those introduced by the UN Security Council, is illegitimate and undermines the collective nature of international efforts. Today, the world is watching with alarm as the U.S. imposes yet a new set of restrictions against Iran which, on top of all, are exterritorial in nature and threaten the realization of Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action that became one of the key factors of international and regional stability.
The faultiness of unilateral sanctions policy has been long proven by the example of more than half a century of the U.S. blockade of Cuba, the immediate lift of which for decades has been called for by almost all the UN Member States. It’s time to listen
to these calls.
The confrontation around the DPRK is unfolding dangerously. We resolutely condemn the nuclear missile adventures of Pyongyang in violation of the UN Security Council resolutions. However, the buildup of military hysteria is not only dead-end but also deadly. It goes without saying that all the UN Security Council resolutions must be implemented. But all of them, along with sanctions, contain provisions on the need to resume talks. We launch an appeal to stop blocking these provisions. There is no alternative to the political and diplomatic methods of addressing the nuclear problem of the Korean Peninsula based on dialogue among all interested parties. We call on responsible members of international community to support the Russia-China roadmap contained in the joint statement of 4 July, made by the Foreign Ministries of Russia and China.
Instigation to turmoil and threats of power interference for the sake of the so-called democratization of Venezuela or actions to undermine the legitimate government of any country are inadmissible. In any internal conflicts the international community must encourage the parties to national reconciliation and compromise.
The attempts to ignore differing opinions, to recur to dictate and ultimatums or the use of force in circumvention of the UN Charter have never done any good. The outburst of international terrorism, millions of refugees, unprecedented flows of illegal migration are mainly rooted in the adventurous change of “unsuitable regimes” of the recent years, including armed interventions that brought havoc and destruction in the Middle East and Northern Africa and paved the way for terrorists in all the parts of the world where they have never been before.
Despite the fact that ISIL is pulling back in Syria and Iraq, considerable additional effort is required to stabilize the region. It should be recalled that it is necessary to fight not only ISIL, but also al-Nusra, the latter being tolerated for whatever reason by the U.S. coalition members.
The developments in Syria give grounds for cautious optimism. The 6th International Meeting on Syria in Astana, held on 14-15 September 2017, has finalized the work on the four de-escalation zones agreed upon with the participation of Russia, Iran, Turkey, the U.S., Jordan and the UN and supported by many other countries. These agreements have created conditions for further progress towards the implementation of Resolution 2254 on the basis of direct dialogue between the government and the opposition aimed at joining their efforts to eliminate as soon as possible the terrorist hotbed and restore peace all over the country, and its unity, and resolve acute humanitarian problems.
The most urgent task is to increase the supplies of humanitarian aid and demine the liberated territories. We are convinced that all those who sincerely wish peace to Syria and its people must join their efforts in this process under the leadership of the UN, and without any preconditions.
The cases of use of chemical weapons in the region are a separate issue. All these cases must be investigated honestly and professionally, without any attempts to manipulate OPCW-UN Joint Investigative Mechanism.
The solving of humanitarian tasks and reconciliation of conflicting parties are also relevant for other crises in the region, including the situation in Libya, Yemen, and Iraq. In all these situations, just like in any other conflicts, Russia pursues a balanced policy and works with all parties without exception.
Speaking of the Middle East and North Africa regional issues, we cannot put aside or forget the UN decisions on the Palestinian problem and the Arab Peace Initiative. We attach great importance to the restoration of the Palestinian Unity and welcome the efforts of Egypt in this direction. Russia is ready to assist in any way possible the resumption of direct talks between Israel and Palestine, and cooperate with Quartet partners and Arab League for this purpose. The unresolved Palestinian problem continues to be exploited by the extremists who recruit more and more adept.
The never-ending bloody terrorist attacks around the world illustrate the illusory nature of the attempts to create ‘isolated safe havens’. Extremism and terrorism can only be fought jointly, without double standards or hidden agendas, and relying on the main responsibility of States, as envisaged in the UN Global Counter-terrorism Strategy.
We welcome the reform of counter-terrorism activity of the UN system, initiated by Secretary-General and approved by the General Assembly. We view the appointment of Russia’s representative as head of the new UN Office of Counter-Terrorism as the recognition of Russia’s role in combating this evil. We thank everybody for their support.
Russia is committed to the goal of achieving a nuclear-weapon-free world. Under the existing treaty regimes in the area of arms control and non-proliferation, the complete elimination of nuclear weapons should become the final result of the process of universal and total disarmament ensuring equal and indivisible security. The attempts to ‘outlaw’ the nuclear weapons without taking into account modern realities and turning a blind eye to all the factors that impact the strategic stability today only make this common goal more distant and undermine the consensus regimes of NPT and CTBT.
We launch an appeal to say ‘no!’ to the militarization of information space. We must prevent the transformation of ICTs into an arena of politico-military confrontation and their use as an instrument of pressure, economic damage, and propaganda of ideas of terrorist and extremist ideology.
The UN must focus its efforts on elaboration of the rules of responsible behavior in the digital sphere that meet the security interests of all states.
Russia has drafted a universal convention on countering cybercrime, including hacking. We propose to open its discussion as early as during the current session.
It is obvious that in the future the world will continue to confront a whole range of new long-term challenges affecting all our civilization. We have no right to waste our energy, time and efforts on geopolitical games. This demands collective rather than unilateral approaches.
The process of shaping the polycentric world order is an objective trend that reflects the redistribution of global balance of forces and increasing the factor of cultural and civilizational identity of peoples. All of us, even those used to bossing the world around, will have to adapt to this reality. It is in our common interests not to try and contain this natural process. The world order should become equitable and democratic, just as the founding fathers of the UN envisioned it. Globalization should not antagonize, but play a unifying role, taking into account the interests of all states without exception and contributing to stable and secure future for all humanity.
Without mutual trust, it is impossible to expect effective implementation of the ambitious Sustainable Development Goals or the Paris Climate Agreement, or the solution of global tasks of food security, population, healthcare that are crucial to the developing countries.
The fundamental principles of international relations should include the recognition of political pluralism, freedom of choice and the rule of law. It is necessary to stop relying on military alliances, and provide support and security guarantees to the States that opted for neutrality. As for economy, it is necessary to work on reducing the obstacles to trade and investment, and stop politicizing the economic relations. The international Olympic movement and sports in general should be depoliticized.
It is necessary to educate, first of all, the youth, in the spirit of respect for cultural and civilizational diversity of the modern world. We invite everybody to the 19thWorld Festival of Youth and Students that will be hosted by Russia in Sochi in less than a month. Another major international event held at the same time will be the 137th Interparliamentary Union Assembly in Saint Petersburg with its main topic for discussion: “Strengthening of peace and security through intercultural and interreligious dialogue”. Let us encourage this dialogue among various cultures and religions, and stop using historic events to instigate hatred and phobias.
The philosophy of coexistence, conjugation and harmonization of interests of various countries is the grounds for President Vladimir Putin’s proposed concept of great Eurasian partnership open to all States of Asia and Europe and aimed at the formation of common economic and humanitarian space on the basis of the principle of indivisible security. It goes without saying that equal rights for all, citizens or states, are a universal requirement as stated, as a matter of fact, in the UN Charter.
Indeed, these just and equitable principles are the grounds for the activities of various institutions in which Russia actively participates: Commonwealth of Independent States, Collective Security Treaty Organization, Eurasian Economic Union, Shanghai Cooperation Organization SCO, and BRICS. In the same way, we build our relations with ASEAN, African Union, CELAC, and other associations of Asian, African and Latin American countries. Through joint efforts we achieve a more balanced approach in the work of such institutions as the G-20, APEC, IMF, and IBRD.
We believe in the vitality of this Organization, and would like that the Secretary-General play an active role in facilitating the full realization of its potential based on the goals and principles of the UN Charter and respecting the prerogatives of the UN intergovernmental bodies. A specially tailored approach is required for the ideas of peacekeeping reform where there should be no abrupt shifts or abandonment of invaluable experience accumulated over the decades.
Two millennia ago, the Roman philosopher Seneca (in his Moral letters to Lucilius) wrote: “We are born to live together”. The UN founding fathers came closest to the realization of this fact. They were convinced (as they enshrined in the UN Charter) that God-given coexistence on one planet must compel all of us to unite in order to prevent the scourge of new wars. To be able to do it today we need to revive the culture of dialogue, search for the balance of interests against the instincts of instant solutions and the desire to “punish the disobedient”. In essence, it is a matter of preserving humanity in all its wealth and diversity.
Russia has always been and remains open to joint work with all those who show reciprocal readiness to cooperate on the basis of equality. We will continue to uphold these principles in the UN activities the interest of improving global governance and true democratization of international relations.
The antidote to the poison – Trump speech.
Thank you Mr. Lavrov.
This man stands ten feet tall on the world stage. One of the few grown ups in the room. Long may he prevail
Such a pleasure reading this statement by Minister Lavrov. All based on common sense, reciprocal respect and the rule of law (something that the so-called civilized West claims for itself but has yet to deliver).
There are elements of “apology” – in the classical sense of reasons for doing…
There are invitations…
Withal it’s a “this is our final offer, ol’ pa, an’ here’s how an’ whyl” In places he sound like Jefferson…eh? I hear that.
Yes, mere opinion…but objectively it is a lowering cloud of violence on the horizon – a fine time to lay out the position…for the record, and expecting to prevail…quite logical. Perhaps this speech will enter the postwar canon…I rather expect that. Of course, nothing is sure save death.
North Korea: The poorest advanced ecomony in the World.
There is also a bit of history with Jim Jones Cult and the Mansons.
God bless you, Minister Lavrov. A world free of nuclear weapons, that is indeed within the realm of the practically possible, a future we should be promising to generations to come. Thank you for expressing it as a goal.
This is the current freakshow that Lavrov and allies are up against. A zionazi shadow empire obsessed with maintaining and expanding their control of the planet and an american colonial regime fanatically loyal to them like no other in history.
Netanyahu and Trump Conspire to Ditch Deal with Iran
“In a dangerously inflammatory speech to the UN General Assembly, this week, a warmongering Israeli Prime Minister, (currently under investigation for fraud, bribery and corruption by his own Justice Department), incited violence by calling for insurrection by the Iranian people against their democratically elected government. It was a speech that should never have been allowed, by a politician who is determined that his secretly nuclear-armed state becomes the regional hegemon with help from a compliant American president.
The UN Security Council should now propose a Resolution demanding that Israel submit its secret nuclear arsenal to inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and becomes a party to the nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), failing which it should be subject to international trade sanctions as well as a comprehensive arms embargo.
Trying to overturn the internationally agreed deal with Iran is a dangerous strategy for nuclear dominance by Netanyahu that must be stopped in its tracks by the European Union, China and Russia, in the interests of world peace.”
I really hope you come back and read my reply.
You (actually everybody) should download the PDF from this site
The John Hay Initiative
and read it, especially the chapter about Iran and the Nuclear Deal.
This was 2014/2015…. way way before the Trump.
“You (actually everybody) should download the PDF from this site
The John Hay Initiative”
Because everything that is happening now, is already written in the report/book.
It is actually the geopolitical playbook of the ZNeocons.
The John Hay Initiative is like PNAC 2.0. Same warmongers, Robert Kagan et al.
And all their plans are revealed in there. For each World region, China, Russia, Europe, Iran etc.
For example, regarding China, they say build bases around it, missile shields etc,
but they themselves acknowledge they can’t take China head on because
the US economy depends on cheap Chinese imports. This says it all.
Second example, regarding Iran, they already planned in 2014/2015 that the next
POTUS had to ditch the Iran deal because *reasons*. And so on…
Very good insight into ZNeocon mindset & plans. That’s all.
Sergey Lavrov has his work cut out …
From an interesting comment at MoA (Virgile | Sep 23, 2017) which (hopefully) the Saker et al will comment on here in due course — e.g. in respect to how deep this US view is reflected in the system etc.
The American Enterprise and Institute of war views on the “Syrian theater” sept 2017
Intelligence Estimate and Forecast: The Syrian Theater
For a quick summary see “Concluding Recommendations:” (pp. 40-41) — some of which is included below:
The U.S. will need to reset several policy frames
to achieve these objectives. First, the U.S. must
recognize that President Assad is not sovereign or
capable of maintaining long-term security in Syria
with or without the sustained support of Russia
and Iran. Assad remains one of the primary drivers
fueling radicalization and recruitment for ISIS, al
Qaeda, and the wider Salafi-jihadi movement. The
existence of his regime perpetuates the regional
sectarian conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran,
which will likely escalate over the next six months.
The removal of Assad is a necessary condition to
achieve a durable solution to the Syrian Civil War.
Any solution will also require a commitment from
the international community to secure the country
with professional and non-sectarian security
forces committed to installing a democratic and
representative government. The U.S. must identify
ways to apply meaningful pressure against Assad,
Russia, and Iran rather than pursuing avenues for
cooperation and accommodation.
Second, the U.S. must recognize that Assad and the
Russo-Iranian Coalition are destabilizing actors in
the Middle East. Their definitions of meaningful
security do not require them to defeat Salafijihadist
groups in Iraq and Syria. Their actions, in
fact, increase ethno-sectarian tension in ways that
fuel the radicalization among local Sunni Arabs.
They remain incapable of securing Iraq and Syria
to a degree acceptable to the U.S. and Europe. The
U.S. cannot rely on the Russo-Iranian Coalition
to defend American national security at home even
as Russia and Iran escalate against U.S. interests
abroad. The U.S. will face greater risk over the
coming months to its forces in Iraq and Syria at the
hands of proxy forces backed by Iran. The U.S. will
need to establish a meaningful deterrence posture
in Iraq and Syria to constrain the actions of Russia,
Iran, and Assad as a necessary condition to pursue
other vital policy objectives.
Third, the U.S. must withstand the temptation
to endorse diplomatic solutions that partition
Iraq and Syria. These proposals serve only to
aid regional adversaries and accelerate regional
instability. The patchwork of ‘de-escalation zones’
promoted by Russia, Iran, and Turkey in Syria, for
example, generates local spheres of influence that
impede rather than advance a
path to long-term stability. . . .
Fourth, the U.S. must consider how to reinforce
its own military positions in the region in the
face of a deliberate and expanding threat from
Russia in the Middle East. Turkey and Jordan are
particularly vulnerable to cooptation by the RussoIranian
coalition. The U.S. could begin to stabilize
its regional position by retaining and expanding
its presence in Eastern Syria. . . .
The mooted statement/quote consisting of four point is astonishing. It describes an entirely delusional world-view and Policy Set.
When men act in significant way according to delusions they are heading into the abyss.
“That’s a beautiful beach!” They say, and dive off a cliff 200 feet above the surf…splat.
Delusions, the creation of delusions, and the traps the make…this is much of Strategy and Tactics…but when a major actor creates his own delusions for himself…well that’s the path to oblivion.
As the world can see today…splat. Over and over again. Now, where’s that brass ring?
The aei are an israeli front. Their job is to provide Israeli policy disquised as pindo interests and to do so, they use every goebbelsian propaganda tactic in the book.
Piss on ’em.
Purpose of posting it here was not to promote it — rather to expose its mind frame to some broader analysis/commentary.
Are you also the anonymous at 8:29 & 11:34? If so it would help out a lot if you choose a nick and stuck to it.
“Purpose of posting it here was not to promote it — rather to expose its mind frame to some broader analysis/commentary.”
Gotcha. The aei are a major policy think tank for the zionazis, and as such, what they vomit out publicly can show what zionazi, inc. is pursuing. In a broad sense, like what the zionazi-gay media spew. Their (aei) hard core stuff isn’t publicly available, like with all of these zpc/nwo think tanks, and that is the real useful material they produce (for us). In the same way CIA & mossad classified material is, as opposed to what they proclaim publicly.
“Are you also the anonymous at 8:29 & 11:34? ” — yes.
“… it would help out a lot if you choose a nick and stuck to it.” — I’ve been disinclined in the past to do so (as a very casual participant) but seeing as you demand so nicely, in future I’ll use “fredx” (unless someone uses this) to help the reader, although I also reserve the right to change outside of particular posting thread etc.
“… and that is the real useful material they produce (for us). In the same way CIA & mossad classified material is, as opposed to what they proclaim publicly.” — well, agreed, but unless it is a major psyops distraction they can hardly be totally inconsistent and diametrically opposed to their public statements. The challenge is to read between the lines for the theme(s) and signals etc, for in a way they are normally also trying to facilitate public alignment with their ideologies and strategies. If the general framework is understood then, sometimes what is not included also covers the ‘dog that did not bark’ etc.
Thank you for background info.
No ‘awake’ Human wants to hear what Trump said at the UN- his speech was the polar opposite of any form of sane rhetoric- and by listening to Trump one has to conceed that the world has gone mad, for no intelligent person can deny the planetry power that Trump represents.
So people on our side think they detect the death of hope, and thus essentially enter some state of denial or other. But here’s the thing. Yes there is a ‘death of hope’ but only the type of hope that was ***always*** wrong in the first place. The wrong ‘hope’ borne of a lifetime of lies from people you have mistakenly trusted.
The wrong hope is the ‘turn the other cheek’ hope. The wrong hope is ‘always find good in your enemy’ hope. The wrong hope is ‘good citizens vote’ hope. The wrong hope is ‘never use the methods of your enemy’ hope. The wrong hope is ‘non-revolutionary people power always wins out’ hope.
So what then, in our straits, is the ***right*** hope. Well that’s simple. Having someone on your side as big and powerful as your greatest enemy who is willing and able to smash the face of your enemy and show his backers that they risk losing everything.
The supporters of a bully never want a ‘fight to the death’- even if the odds are even. No- they want to know that their side is the winning side no matter what. And if they see the bully that they support thumped till he is on his knees, with a real chance of being taken out, then they’ll desert that bully to a man.
So real hope is that Russia will finally comprehend the desperation of the Human situation,and strike America a stunning blow, so that all the fools, cowards and neer-do-wells that currently support the West understand that the Deep State has taken them to the brink, and that unless they withdraw their support of the warmongers, the Human Race is going to end up falling into the abyss.
Diplomacy can’t do this. After the fact ‘victories’ in Crimea and Syria cannot do this. Appeals to the truth cannot do this. Only the destruction of the reputation of the bully can do this.
I do not believe ordinary people support suicide. I do not believe ordinary people support aggressive warmongering where there is a real and obvious possibility of their side going down as a result. I believe ordinary people can only ever be ***fair-weather friends*** of the monsters. Why else do you think the Deep State use the zionists to control everything the people hear, read and see? If this was a game of power alone, at some point lies would no longer be needed. But the lies are needed because without the lies the public would withdraw their support, and Great Evil simple fades away when people stop believing in its cause.
A second before all is lost, everyone wishes they had opted to be a warrior, so they could die on their feet fighting. But Game Theory tells us one must identify the optimum moment to use ‘the way of the warrior’, and not bury one’s head in the sand until one dies with regret.
Trump and Putin are standing still as giant statues facing each other unblinking like those legendary opponents in Japanese and Chinese ancient tales. But Trump is waiting for the perfect moment to strike while ‘wise’ Putin still thinks their can be a non-violent solution, so is still thinking he can avoid combat. But contrary to ancient asian ‘wisdom’, only the one who strikes first can win- and then winning isn’t guaranteed since both may lose.
Lavrov’s speech is the ‘million word’ delusion why Putin must always remain still, and allow Trump the first blow. If this advice is followed it is impossible for Russia/us to win- impossible. The ‘best’ we can have is mutual destruction.
For us to follow ‘the way of the warrior’ won’t alter ***our*** weapons- namely words. But it will mean we want, with all our will, for Russia to finally start using ‘deeds’ rather than words. And today with have a fine example… the Russian MOD has given a detailed briefing using aerial surveillance proving the cooperation between American Special Forces and wahhabi ISIS terror forces. The co-operation, of course, is to allow the Deep State front, SDF, to frustrate Russia’s desire to pacify the entire nation of Syria.
The SDF is one of many heads of the US terror snake in Syria- the ‘reasonable’ head that talks with a forked tongue. Since Lavrov dribbles nonsense about how words will save the Earth, the SDF head is designed to dribble Lavrov pleasing sentiments, so Lavrov is forced to agree that the SDF is OK by Russia- and thus Russia does not strike SDF forces even when they clearly operate in ISIS regions in perfect cooperation with ISIS.
I want Putin to say that any force in Syria that seeks to frustrate the will of the SAA alliance, or places military assets on economic assets anywhere in Syria, will be targeted without mercy until fully exterminated- without future warning. I want Putin to say this explicitly includes US/UK and French special forces. And I want this fully legally warning to be issued thru the UN. Because the UN is the hub of international law, and Russia and the SAA alliance are the ***only*** legal expression of military might in Syria. By definition univited foreign forces are ***terrorists***- and this most certainly apples to the Americans.
There is nothing on Earth Trump or the Deep State can do against such a Statement form Putin- nothing. America isn’t going to go to war to protect its illegal acts against the sovereignty of another nation whoses protector is Russia. So the hour after Putin makes this statement, all the West’s forces will withdraw- and as has happened many many times in recent US history- withdraw without most of their equipment.
The greatest lie that is told to very naive fools is that America only withdraws slowly to take all of its kit with it. No, no- a thousand times no. Even in the last decade the USA, when required, has moved forces so rapidly, not only did they leave most of the heavy kit behind, they didn’t even have time to destroy it. For ***law*** applies to soldiers, and not to hardware. So how long do Americans et al need to leave Syria? Little more than an hour if that.
The ‘way of the warrior’ means Putin chases out America in one hour- think about that! And then the illusionary SDF vanishes, the kurds and arab tribes are forced to sign agreements, and the ‘civil war’ is over.
Don’t get me wrong- Putin’s ‘way of the muscular vicar’ will eventually sorta achieve the same thing in Syria- with much added unneccesary bloodshed and the Deep State having time to figure out brand new needles they can push into the side of the Syrian people. But the slow way will have far more ragged infected wounds healing poorly if at all. And the slow way will allow Russia to be depicted as weak and cowardly in the face of US special forces in the zionist press of the West.
PS the BBC news today was all about the far greater threat ‘war mongering’ Iran represents over N Korea with its missile research. Trump at the UN only promised to attack one nation on Earth- Iran. If Putin wrapped up things in Syria by immediately chasing out illegal American forces, Russia and friends could concentrate on preventing the imminent US war on Iran.