Forces of Syrian President Bashar al Assad are seen on a tank in Arjoun village near Qusair town May 30, 2013.
The Syrian Army has seized two containers with poisonous sarin agent in a rebel hideout, SANA said citing sources. Meanwhile, Russia reportedly blocked the UNSC resolution set to slam Damascus’ offensive on the town of Qusair held by opposition forces.
Syrian Arab News Agency reports that sarin, together with automatic rifles, pistols and homemade bombs (IEDs) was seized in the Faraieh neighborhood of the city of Hama.
Sarin (or GB) is an extremely toxic, though colorless and odorless, substance that disrupts the nervous system, over-stimulating muscles and vital organs, if it comes into contact with skin. This potentially extremely harmful nerve agent was originally invented and manufactured to be used as a chemical weapon. According to UN Resolution 687, Sarin is classified as a weapon of mass destruction.
The threat of chemical weapons deployment in Syria has become a major international concern, with American President Barack Obama even saying previously that the use of chemical arsenal by the Syrian government would be a “red line” and might precipitate a foreign military intervention.
However, in early May an independent UN commission came to the conclusion that Syrian rebels had used sarin nerve gas, while allegations of its use by the government have not yet received any official confirmation.
Russia ‘blocks’ another UNSC resolution on Syria
On Saturday a UN Security Council (UNSC) assembly failed to adopt a British-drafted resolution on the situation in Qusair, which the Syrian Army has blockaded and is said to be eliminating a large group of opposition forces that occupied the town several weeks ago.
A handout picture released by the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) on May 30, 2013, shows Syrian army soldiers walking nearby facilities of Dabaa military airfield during an operation that led to the control of the airport, north of the Syrian city of Qusayr.
Rebels besieged in Qusair are pleading for military help. They claim that many civilians have been wounded in the assault of the government forces and that these people are in desperate need of medical attention.
The Syrian foreign minister says the country will allow the Red Cross into Qusair “as soon as military operations are over,” he is cited by Syrian State Television.
The UK-drafted UN statement obtained by Reuters claims that Assad’s government must “allow immediate, full and unimpeded access to impartial humanitarian actors, including UN agencies, to reach civilians trapped in Qusair.”
According to Reuters’ sources in the Security Council, Russia blocked the resolution during private discussions on Saturday, explaining that the UNSC had made no statement when the rebels came to Qusair in force and seized the town.
It is “not advisable to speak out as the UN Security Council didn’t when Qusair was taken by the opposition,” a Russia diplomat reportedly said in the UNSC.
So far Russia has officially vetoed three resolutions on Syria in the UNSC saying they were “unbalanced” targeting Assad’s government while sending weak to no message to the opposition fighters.
An empty ammunition casing and a fire are seen in a field after heavy fighting between Free Syrian Army fighters, and the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Lebanon’s Hezbollah at the al Barak area near Qusair town May 31, 2013.
Earlier this week the UN Human Rights Council passed a resolution on the worsening human rights situation in Syria and in particular in connection with battle for Qusair.
The document puts the blame for Qusair violence solely on Damascus troops and condemns the involvement of “foreign combatants” fighting on the side of the Syrian government.
The Russian Foreign Ministry pointed out that the resolution deliberately ignore numerous human rights violations and abuses of Qusair civilians committed by armed foreign jihadists, some of whom have links to Al-Qaeda.
The “foreign combatants” mentioned in the resolution are fighters of the previously neutral Hezbollah group which have joined Syrian military in the offensive on Qusair, overturning the balance in the stand-off to the opposition’s disadvantage.
The Syrian opposition has even threatened not to attend the peace conference in Geneva that is being prepared by Russia and the US for July because of Hezbollah’s involvement.
The ongoing siege of Qusair has raged for two weeks now. On Saturday, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stated that he is “following with the gravest concern” the situation in Qusair. He reminded the government of Bashar Assad of its responsibility to protect civilians on the Syrian territory, including those threatened by militants, and urged to allow thousands of Qusair residents to flee the town.
A partial view of the city of Qusayr, in Syria’s central Homs province, as the Syrian army forces battle opposition fighters, on May 25, 2013.
In another statement issued on Saturday the UN Humanitarian Chief Valerie Amos and the UN Human Rights Head Navi Pillay maintained that there are as many as 1,500 injured people in Qusair who need immediate evacuation for emergency medical treatment.
UN officials said that if the information they are receiving is correct, “the general situation in Qusair is desperate.”
“We urge the parties to agree to an immediate ceasefire to allow humanitarian agencies to evacuate the wounded and provide life-saving treatment and supplies,” Amos and Pillay said in their statement.
Qusair, with an original population of 30,000, is less than 10 km from the Lebanese border and some 25 km from the city of Homs.
In the meantime there have been reports of intensifying clashes between the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA) and Assad’s forces near Aleppo. Allegedly, the troops have captured Mount Shuwaihinah, a dominating point in the area.
FSA brigades are reportedly calling for reinforcements to be sent in from other areas.
Off topic how to solve the problem of the Imperial Dollar and protect poor countries from debt slavery.
If Russia introduced an International Clearing Union for the CIS/Eurasian Union states and also proposed this to the BRICS it could potentially liberate the global South and the global East from Western economic imperialism.
This after Turkey “discovered” some Nusra A$$ clowns with sarin gas inside Turkey.
Which I took as a planned false flag by Turkey, probably aborted when Erdo got cold feet. Seeing as how the Reyhanli bombing story collapsed like a house cards in Oklahoma, I don’t blame him.
Any thoughts on the turkey protests?
@Anonymous:Any thoughts on the turkey protests?
No, not really. I have always been deeply suspicious of the Turkish state and I dislike about 99.99999% of what I see from it’s foreign policy, but I really know close to nothing about internal Turkish politics so I don’t feel that I should comment on a situation a fundamentally don’t understand. Besides, there are enough people doing that already ;-)
Sorry for the lame reply, but I much rather be honest about my own ignorance.
I’m re-posting a comment that I made in another place (the interview with Assad). I’d like your take in this point (if that’s your wish, obviously)
First of all, Thanks for your kind answer.
Second, I’m not thinking mostly in the current situation. I hope, as you, that these determined leaders keep on leading.
But I, basically, think in the near future (10, maximum 20 years), when they need to retire, or take the very risky Fidel Castro way. Your point avout
the exceptional character of those leaders is pretty sound, but I wonder if some lessons about endurance and resilience
from the military organizations could be applied to the political ones, since IMHO the very hard task of resist this evil empire need strength in both of these.
It could be that, given the accelerating speed at which the empire is self-devouring (again, IMO), in ten years or so we don’t have these worries, but there’s also the chance that the struggle will be going on against forces
that, the weaker they get, the meaner & psychotic they become.
Well, I hope than in the next decade the russians and everyone else can figure out sound methods of political sucession
We shall see, I guess.
Cheers and happiness!
@Anonymous: I wonder if some lessons about endurance and resilience
from the military organizations could be applied to the political ones
I really don’t think so, alas. Military organizations took centuries, sometimes millenia, to develop and learn from their mistakes, often the very hard way and they foster a kind of culture which is deeply alien to civilians. As for the problem of succession, it is one which has never been truly solved in any field. Sometimes the succession is smooth, sometimes it is not. As for truly charismatic leaders, they are irreplaceable almost by definition. Furthermore, brilliant people always make a lot of enemies who often wait for their death to strike out.
I will say this: the Empire’s support in Russia is something in the range of 1-1.5% of the population. I suspect that in Iran it is higher, something in the 20% range, or even more, but it is not enough to tip the balance, God willing. And sometimes societies reach a kind of “point of no return” where changes simply cannot be rolled back even if a charismatic dies. This might be what is happening today in Venezuela.
I am not sure I can say anything beyond that. Sorry!
Cheers and kind regards,