The Donald’s right and wrong 8352 Views April 17, 2018 Sandbox The Saker The Essential Saker IV: Messianic Narcissism's Agony by a Thousand Cuts Order Now The Essential Saker III: Chronicling The Tragedy, Farce And Collapse of the Empire in the Era of Mr MAGA Order Now Tagged HumorThe Donald
Millions of dead children since the Korean War, 1950. All under US bombs, of various kinds made famous in photos. Napalm, white phosphorus, cluster, hyperbaric, fragmentation, gravity, laser guided, smart, chemical, MOAB, JDAM, and on and on.
Dead children on nearly every continent. Dead children in the cause of hegemony. Dead children who were no threat and not just ‘collateral’. Many had been starved and deprived because of sanctions beforehand.
Dead Children–the mark of US military in defiance of God’s Law and International Law.
Over seventy years of Dead Children killed by US Government Bombs from Korea to Raqqa and Mosul.
Karma will be Hell.
So sensible… thank you. I posted other musical clip elsewhere in these days, maybe no bad another one for your thoughts. Bye
When the children cry (White Lion) – acoustic:
Look at it this way:
Theresa Mae says; If there is a chemical attack we are going to bomb Syria
Macron says the same.
Putin tells Trump, someone is preparing a false flag.
Trump says he wants out of Syria.
False flag happens, Trump must know it’s fake. What to do?
He says we are going to attack with our latest missiles. We are going massive. Russia be damned.
He doesn’t even talk to Mae, He doesn’t tell Putin, only Macron. It’s definately going to start WWIII.
Marcon and Mae and Mattis shit their pants. This is the end. London, Paris and Washington will be destroyed.
Marcon talks Trump back, limited strikes on useless targets. Marcon tells Putin to relax. Nobody will die.
Syria defeats attack.
Trump declares “Mission Accomplished”. His enemies in the press are forced to declare a Triumph.
Paris and London are forced to consider they could have been destroyed. Paris and London are forced to see that they don’t have a military option. Paris and London forced to reconsider their position.
Next Trump says I want out and to use a proxy force. At the same time Putin makes a big show of sending bridging equipment and a task force. Russia is going to cross the Euphrates.
Are Paris London and the Washington war party going to risk death again over a slice of desert?
Like Trump said: “Mission Accomplished “. The stage is set for the next phase.
Good summary about the realities.
But this does not mean May and Macron and Merkel are reformed after realizing they have stimulated Trump to go to the Brink….they will just try new attempts to destabilise Russia and its allies.
I am not a Russian but i know the Western mindset extremely well and my own view is that whilst the West sees Bear Baiting as a sport (the Swiss word Zeukeln describes it so much better), Bullies can only be stopped by the Bear lacerating some Western Assets and drawing real blood.
The process whereby Russia keeps a dignified silence and a resolutely legal and procedurally correct approach may be the more mature and reasoned method of interstate relations but, it is NOT respected by the Psychopathic western leaders. The current process – whereby the Duma is “mulling” over countermeasures and the Russian Military is “mulling” over giving the S300 to those friends who are seen to be at high risk of being attacked by a malevolent West – seems far too timid…and the Western media is picking up this Vibe and saying “Haha Russia keeps making threats but in the end they are easy to manipulate, we will trip them up eventually.”
If Russia closed down e.g. its rocket engine sales to the USA FULLY and not half-heartedly this would send a far more resolute message. Putin implies: “well…we may be able to have warmer relations with the west again in future, so lets not close the door completely, we are still debating whether we should do this” – simply does not work in todays climate. Zhirinovskis absolutist approach would be far more in keeping with – and appropriate – to counter US behaviour.
Same with removing Russia from the SWIFT system. JUST DO IT FINALLY…dont just talk about “slowly moving towards a gradual decoupling.”
Same with free-floating the Rouble. This should have been done ages ago and Russia would not have lost all the reserves to prop up the rouble. The rapid rise in exports due to a more favourable exchange rate, would have compensated for this.
Another report by Engelhardt stated that Russia had a clause added by the USA in its Constitution which fixed the relationship between the State and the Central Bank. Why this timidity by the Russian leadership? Why not right now, EXERCISE sovereignty and change the Constitution back to suit Russian National Interests as a priority? Re-Nationalise all privatised assets in Gas, oil, electric power, water, and all other Public services. There was nothing wrong with the Communist Era methodology. Infrastructure services existed for the people not for the 1% of speculators. The Western privatisation process also destabilised Western European societies from 1980 and created a return to Feudal Principles. Russia does not need to think that this needs to be emulated. I hope that Grudinin can influence this process with some energy…
I would rather suggest that way:
French are far more involved (and concerned) in Syria than it seems. Remember that:
– Assad had been acused of Hariri murder (2005), we now know it was a flase flag
– Syria had for long a special relationship with France (and France kept for long influence there)
– 2008 to 2010 French president had few meetings with Assad, especially
“In July, Assad made a highly-publicised visit to Paris for the Mediterranean Union Summit, hosted by Sarkozy, and attended Bastille Day celebrations alongside Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.”
(curiously, the same French president had the same kind of meetings with Kadhafi a year before , and we know how it ended)
“Lancaster house” French/British treaty was signed in November 2010 (at that time, negotiations with US regarding new map of middle-east were ending.
Last meetings high level meeting was end of 2010. Troubles in Syria started 3 months after.
Lybia was destroyed in 2011
French have been supporting Free Syrian Army since the beginning (unofficially of course)
And remember 2013, when French and British have been trying to convince Obama to strike Syria.
We have then 3 powers that have been involved in Syria with slightly different targets, US to counter Iran (and weaken Syria as much as possible, as per PNAC and RAD), French for resources / Influence, British to support the French (that in turn supported and will support them for new middle-east map)
My bet would rather be that:
– Trump announces US would be leaving Syria, transferring responsibility.
– Quick, the flase flag needs to be setup to “force” US to take action
– Then French/British to convince Trump he needed to do something
Remember also, Macron proudly announcing that he convinced Trump to stay longer in Syria (with US denying it the day after)
And, in no way it was limited striked on limited, useless targets. This is just west’s new narrative to try not to loose face, as no way 76 missiles would be fired at just one single small target, that is ridiculous.
We now know French were supposed to launch at least 14 missiles more, but they faced one failure with one airborne missile, and their cruiser failed. Then, possibly (but who can confirm ?), there is that story with the UK sub being “hunted”, and unable to fire its missiles in due time.
Russian version presents far more credibility, and has almost not change since the early hours. In that case, Syrian anti-aircraft capabilities were for sure targetted (hence the AGM-158, and supposedly “stealth” strom shadow/SCALP).
Indeed, once Syrian anti-air defences taken out, Russia would have been faced with the last escalation step : shoot ennemy planes (and escalate to WWIII), or not, and lose Syria.
It’s of course far from being the end, but at least costs for the west have raised.