By Ken Leslie for The Saker Blog
1. A bit more on the protests
Again, I’d like to thank the Saker for publishing my essay. I also want to thank the commenters—criticisms inspire me and encouragement inspires me even more! I think we both agree that the public needs to be better informed about the roots and antecedents of the current US protests which have spread to most of the world. In a sense, this is a continuation of my previous polemic which received mainly negative reactions. Although I had anticipated this, I was still puzzled. Not only is the case for protests solid but all the counter-arguments (George was a criminal, Soros is funding the dreaded Antifa etc.) sounded hollow and contrived. The reasons for supporting the uprising (however ephemeral it might turn out to be) are overwhelming. If you empathise with the predicament of the Black Americans, you will see this as a genuine cri de coeur and demand for change (see recent pronouncements by Angela Davis, Cornel West, Black Agenda Report and Spike Lee). If you don’t and have been on the receiving end of the Empire’s benevolence for the last 70 years, you will appreciate the irony and the sight of the mighty Exceptionalistan (with apologies to Mr Escobar) stumbling around, riven to the bone by internal strife and hatred, for once focussed on its own misery and less able to inflict pain on the rest of the world. In the immortal words of Nancy Pelosi, “it is a wonderful sight to behold”.
So, why are most of the alternative media (with the honourable exception of Caitlin Johnstone and Saker) completely silent about such a momentous event. Moreover, media such as RT are actively engaged in smearing the protesters and bolstering the official right-wing narrative (in contrast to the Russian officials who have criticised the US posture). Is it possible that all the years of anti-imperial “struggle” have been a propaganda sham? It felt like I woke up inside a bad-ish dream in which the people around me turn into strangers. How could I be so disconnected from my friends and people I’ve been following and cheering on for years? Have I turned into a SJW overnight or have they all become raging racists? After a few days of pondering the strange situation, it occurred to me that neither interpretation was correct. Rather, the strange reaction that caused such a surprise was due to something else.
This is about reassuring the frightened white people that their status will not be threatened by the unruly unwashed masses. Everywhere, I see unproductive and uncreative white people hiding behind great inventions and works of art a la: What have the blacks invented/written/etc. Well, the black people have never done me any wrong and their music has enriched my life beyond measure. It was the white imperialists, racists and supremacists who have destroyed countless lives and nations. I feel no allegiance to these soulless people and am siding with the younger generation, black and white, which is tired of hypocrisy and psychopathy of power. In the meantime, several black men were ruthlessly killed by the police—and no, they were not career criminals.
To my Soros-hating friends: If you think that Soros is capable of organising and co-ordinating mass protests around the world so skilfully that none have been drowned in blood thus far, I sincerely believe that you are mistaken. By accusing Soros and the Illuminati of controlling the universal call for the end to neoliberal dictatorship, you are removing all sense of agency from a large proportion of humanity. You think they are stupid and incapable of recognising injustice. You in turn are condemned forever to bend your knee before brute force and false idols of the West. We live in a world governed by three unproductive parasite businesses whose profits dwarf GDPs of large states. Soros is targeting your democracy? Look at the state of the Western media – it is much worse than it was in the reviled Soviet Union. Your “culture”? Again, the USSR and the socialist block countries’ culture and education are still the envy of the world. The West did everything in its power, including pretending to be democratic, in order to destroy them. Forgive me if I don’t cry bitter tears over the legacy of slave owners and murderers. You are so afraid of change and so wedded to the rotten system that you are prepared to suffer countless indignities in order to feel superior to less fortunate human beings.
2. Ideological roots of US conservatism
This part will seem only tangentially relevant to the above section. Yet, I believe it is crucial for a better understanding of the current crisis in the United States. With the gradual revival of the right-wing politics in the West, there was some expectation that the nationalist politicians in Europe and the US would gradually defuse and dismantle the neoliberal order advanced by the United States and Great Britain ever since the 1980s. The fact that during this period both countries have been ruled by reactionary right-wing regimes leveraging patriotism and profit in order to squash any dissent or attempt at improving economic and social justice (and no, the Catholic convert war criminal Tony Blair does not count as a leftist). You heard it right – it was the great anti-communist “patriot” Ronald Reagan who launched the United States on the road to perdition. A B-list Irish-American actor of questionable cognitive abilities, he was also one of the spiritual fathers of the alt-right. The irony must not be allowed to escape us—neoliberalism came from the right which has now morphed into fake “new nationalism” and anti-liberalism. That was the same Ronald Reagan who named April 10th (the founding of the Independent State of Croatia) a national holiday in California and laid flowers on the graves of SS butchers at Bitburg.
I am starting to believe that the exaggerated focus on and demonisation of Soros and his fake-left initiatives is a plan hatched by the fascist right aimed at hiding its dark purposes. This is not to say that Soros is innocent or God forbid—good. It simply means that in order to understand the current situation, we must reach beyond the platitudes served by people whose nefarious plans affect the entire world.
The topic I am trying to introduce here is vast and fascinating. It requires thousands of pages and it is utterly impossible to do it justice within a couple of thousand words. Yet, try I must. And although the subject matter is somewhat removed from the current focus on race, its understanding is crucial for a full appreciation of the roots of the current predicament of the US empire. The thesis I wish to develop is that far from being some kind of benign force whose aim is to liberate people from the yoke of evil Zionist Marxists, the Western right in all its forms is a reactionary, fascist, criminal cabal whose Drang was briefly interrupted in 1945 by the victorious Soviet army. This criminal enterprise which transformed the United States into the most powerful empire in history has many faces and hides behind many guises—anti-communism, conservatism (I consider myself a conservative with a small “c”), struggle for “freedom”, traditional family etc. None of these ideals is wrong in itself but is doubly invalidated if touted by liars, murderers, paedophiles and supremacists.
This is precisely what happened to the right in the West after 1945. It was hijacked by the Vatican and its agents. Their unctuous pronouncements on the sanctity of the family and nation hid unmentionable crimes against individuals and nations. My understanding of the pernicious role of the Roman Catholicism in world politics is so far removed from the current “Marxist Pope” alt-right blabber that I feel compelled to say something—and pronto. By the way, Jesuit Francisco Bergoglio was deeply involved in the dirty war in Argentina in which tens of thousands of innocent people were tortured and disappeared by the bloodthirsty fascist regime. So please, think twice before repeating the “Marxist Pope” trope. His “traditionalist” predecessor beat that by joining Hitler Youth. And what about his predecessor (the “holy” one)? There is evidence that he worked as a salesman for IG Farben, selling Zyklon B to the Nazis. And what about his predecessor? By all accounts a good and caring man intent on exposing the Vatican’s banking empire, pope John Paul I was dispatched after only 33 days on the throne. In this context, perhaps Pope Francis IS a raving Marxist.
It is important to state here that I do not wish to bash Roman Catholics, many of whom try to follow the teachings of Christ as best they can and many of whom have fought valiantly on the side of good. On the contrary, I am aiming to expose the nefarious role of the Vatican in the creation of the post-war quasi-fascist “West”, the role which has disgraced it forever and condemned it to increasing irrelevance. Nor am I trying to say that no other denominations/ethnicities have contributed to the rise of the US empire. I am simply shedding some light on a topic that has been largely neglected by Washington watchers in their blind focus on the “Jewish peril”. I see my essay as a belated attempt at “glasnost” and “perestroika” sorely needed by the West. It is a kind of catharsis that has been long time a-coming but like in the case of the USSR, it might have come too late.
Of course, here, I can only offer a brief sketch of how Roman Catholic networks underpin the current “Anglo-Saxon” hegemony. It was said by many that Adolf Hitler’s government was the most Catholic in German history (Himmler, Goebbels, Hitler and many others). It is interesting that the “patriotic” governments of Ronald Reagan were the most Catholic in the US history. Some of the RCs employed by Reagan (all Irish-American) included William Casey (Director of the CIA), Richard Allen (National Security Advisor), Judge William P. Clarke (National Security Advisor), Robert McFarlane (National Security Advisor), Alexander Haig (Secretary of State), Vernon Walters (Ambassador-at-Large), William Wilson (Ambassador to the Vatican State), Donald Regan (Secretary of the Treasury), Raymond Donovan (Secretary of Labour), Margaret Mary Heckler (Health and Human Services secretary), Joseph Biden (Subcommittee on European affairs), Daniel P. Moynihan (Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs), John Kerry, Terrorism (Narcotics, and International Communications), Christopher Dodd (Western Hemisphere and Peace Corps Affairs). Note the presence in the sub-fascist Reagan regime of two fake RC democrats—Biden and Kerry. This is just a further illustration of the point I made earlier that the “Democrats” are nothing but Repub light. The two faces of (the Roman god) Janus might disagree on abortion but never on the need to expand the empire and subdue/cleanse/convert the heathens. Why then would people anywhere in the world support either option is beyond me.
Thus, the ruling elites of the two most powerful empire states in the modern history were stuffed full of Roman Catholics at the point at which the destruction of the Soviet Union was on the cards. Of course, as shown on Saker’s website, the Roman Catholic hatred of Orthodox (and Protestant) Christianity goes back centuries and has little to do with stopping communism. The best proof of this is the fact that the cardinals in the Vatican jumped with joy on the news that the Orthodox Empire was overthrown (see works of Hansjakob Stehle). For a decade, they tried to co-opt the Bolshevik regime into giving the Church the religious primacy within the new state. When the Bolsheviks refused to play along, The Vatican suddenly discovered “the men of destiny” Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler, both of whom bent over backwards to please the Church. Here, president Putin explains once and for all who has been the principal enemy of Russia (he did not go as far back as the times of Alexander Nevsky).
The question arises here—why has Donald Trump (himself a Jesuit pupil) surrounded himself with Roman Catholics? Many people are so obsessed with the Jews (the Zionist half of the Anglo-Zionist equation) that they are blind to the massive revival of political Catholicism under Trump. Given the predominance of (mainly Jewish) neocons in the previous governments and the synchronised attack on the paedophilia in the Catholic Church, Trump’s victory could be viewed as a mini Reconquista—return to the acme of late 1940s and early 1950s when under the guidance of Cardinal Spelman and Jesuit geopolitician Edmund Walsh, Joseph McCarthy hunted down (mainly Jewish) leftists. That was the time when the Catholic James Forrestal who had funded and co-ordinated the political cleansing of Italy jumped from a hospital window in a bout of anti-communist paranoia. That very same creature funded the Uniate Ukrainian Nazi rebellion inside the Soviet Union. The Vatican’s freedom fighters called their unit “Nightingale” after the notorious Ukrainian Nazi extermination battalion Nachtigall. Look no further if you wish to understand the current tragedy of the fake (Vatican-created) Ukrainian nation.
This was the golden time when the icon of Mary was taken from the Vatican to the US Embassy in Moscow to inspire the fight against “godless communism” and the Catholic fanatic Secretary of the Navy Francis Matthews advocated a nuclear first strike against the Soviets. It was the time when the Roman Catholic dictator Ngo Dinh Diem ruled South Vietnam with an iron fist, working hard to extinguish the Vietnamese Buddhists (almost 90% of the population) in a manner similar to that employed by Ante Pavelic in his Civitas Dei called the Independent State of Croatia. It was also a wonderful time when the Roman Catholic zealot William Donovan created the CIA and began work on the creation of the (Roman Catholic) EU. Those were the halcyon days of Jim Crow and the Nazi-loving Dulles brothers.
What has this got to do with Trump, you’ll ask? Well, the warmongering Russophobe Spellman’s private secretary was one Roy Cohn, a despicable “communist hunter” of McCarthy infamy and the prosecutor at the trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. As a Jew, Cohn worked very hard to ingratiate himself with the fascist Catholic underbelly of America which became equated with American “patriotism” mainly thanks to a clever propaganda campaign by the Church (remember hundreds of maudlin Hollywood renditions of Father Donovans, sergeant Kowalskis and constable O’Haras). Cohn leveraged his pathological anti-communism to become one of the great “power brokers” of US politics (both closeted gays and homophobes, Spellman and Cohn hid their true preferences behind a macho, patriotic façade). He was a popular guest at the court of Ronald Reagan and mentored a number of young conservative politicians before cosmic justice reasserted itself by granting him a painful death in 1986. One of Cohn’s mentees was young Donald Trump whose stellar rise to fame and power owed much to the machinations of a Roman Catholic fixer and Cohn’s protégé, Roger Stone.
The second “fixer” whose work was crucial in engineering the unlikely electoral victory for Trump is Steven Bannon. Although self-evidently Irish and RC, Bannon has flown below the pope-dar. All that most people remember about Bannon is his dissolute appearance and the fact that he used to work for Goldman-Sachs. And yet, Bannon is as close to an ideologue/geostrategic thinker as it is possible to get in the modern US. Bannon is the inheritor of the Roman Catholic geopolitical line which sees the United States as the bastion of Christianity that has to assert complete dominance over the world in order to defend the “civilisation” against the onslaught of socialist or more generally, non-Catholic powers. The progenitor of the “Christian” geopolitical school was Fr. Edmund Walsh, an Irish Jesuit whose views on the role of the United States in world affairs were and remain very influential. The (Jesuit) Georgetown University has a School of Diplomacy bearing Walsh’s name. This elite school sets the tone for the US global supremacist doctrine and has been the home to a number of RC war criminals including Kurt Waldheim (the patron of the Austrian-born “gobernator” of California Arnold S.), Lev Dobriansky and Madalene Albright.
Walsh’s co-religionist and successor, Zbigniew Brzezinski was instrumental in co-ordinating the joint Vatican-US offensive on the USSR which resulted in a decade of untold misery for the peoples of the USSR and Eastern Europe. He also played a critical role in the (s)election of Karol Wojtyla to the papal throne by (again) co-ordinating the work of US, Polish and German cardinals under the auspices of the CIA and US government. Compared with such “achievements”, Brzezinski’s role in fomenting the war in Afghanistan hardly deserves a mention.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the geopolitical situation changed drastically and a dying Russia ceased to be seen as the primary enemy for a while. Focussing on Israel’s geopolitical needs, the ex-Trotskyite neocons schemed to destroy the possibility of a thriving and progressive Middle East. Like their RC patron Brzezinski, they zeroed in on the Islamist infrastructure and used it to destroy the region. Although this strategy seemed unconnected with Russia, it was conceived as a way of surrounding Russia with US Islamist proxies and weakening China by putting pressure on its western Muslim-inhabited regions. This strategy failed ignominiously with the entry of Russia into the war in Syria. At the same time, the economic slide of the United States accelerated and despite fake stock market interventions, Trump was faced with a difficult choice. Instead of fulfilling his anti-imperialist election promises, he tried to distract his supporters by blaming China for all America’s ills. This “last-chance saloon” strategy required an ideological firebrand who would provide necessary ammunition.
From Haaretz (2018): “Stephen Kevin Bannon was the third of five children in a Catholic family of Irish descent, born in 1953. His mother was a homemaker and his father a telephone technician. They sent young Steve to a Benedictine-Catholic military high school for boys. It was in Richmond, Virginia, the former capital of the Confederacy. There he received a classical education.”
Bannon’s rise was funded by among others Robert Mercer, the tech billionaire, who has a penchant for supporting right-wing Catholic politicians (Ted Cruz, Kellyanne Conway etc.). The symbiosis between right-wing WASPS and Roman Catholics in American political life is nothing new. A more interesting question is—how did Bannon manage to smuggle his right-wing Catholicism past the ever-vigilant Jewish-owned “liberal” media? By calling himself a Christian Zionist and a defender of the “Judeo-Christian” civilisation, Bannon skilfully shifted the US geopolitical doctrine from the failed neocon PNAC to the Antemurale Christianitatis (the bulwark of Christendom) model. This narrative sees the US in the same way that the above-mentioned RC fascists of the Eisenhower era viewed it—as a Panzerfaust of Western civilisation whose primary task is to destroy its (non-Catholic) enemies. In Bannon’s case, these enemies are Shia Islam and Communist China. This time around, the Jews are viewed as equals (at least for the time being). This shift from targeting Russia might be baffling but is easily explainable—again from Haaretz:
What the U.S. needs to do, he believes, is avoid pushing the Russians into the arms of the Chinese (which is critical for Israel with regard to the Iranian problem, where Russo-Chinese collusion could prove very problematic). Just as Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon wanted to improve relations with China in order to isolate Russia, Bannon wants to improve relations with Russia in order to isolate China. That’s something Trump understands deeply, he says.
So, part of the reason why Russia-friendly commenters are reluctant to criticise Bannon and Trump is because ostensibly, the dynamic duo are treating Russia as an equal—a potential partner in a new Yalta-like carve-up of the world. This of course is a complete sham—a cheap and incredibly arrogant red herring. US politicians and experts understand very well that American empire is fading fast and that in order to maintain its grasp on the world, it must split its enemies and attack the more dangerous one first. By focussing on Russia, Bannon would have had to shed the mantle of a freedom fighter and concede that the underlying reason for American belligerence is a Crusade against non-Catholics. In the eyes of the Vatican, Orthodox Christians remain heathen barbarians. Hence the sanctions, murders of Russian diplomats and soldiers, theft of diplomatic property, ramped up threat of a nuclear attack, the ripping up of all nuclear agreements—all under Trump. At the same time, China, that last bastion of freedom from Roman Catholic imperialism, is thus a natural target for Bannon and Trump. Not only would Its destruction inject some badly-needed blood into the weakening body of the empire, it would also guarantee an instantaneous revival of Roman Catholicism as the most powerful religion in the world. The Vatican employed the same tactic against the Russian Empire and Soviet Union and its struggle for world domination continues apace. Bannon is simply their plausibly deniable pawn.
Attacking China is easy, especially for an RC ideologue. China is one of three countries that does not have formal relations with the Vatican (the United States succumbed under Ronald Reagan). China is “godless”, communist and authoritarian—all the tired tropes once used against the Soviet Union have been taken out of the closet only to be wielded by the bibulous Crusader knight to little effect. No mention of the Vatican’s genocides (at least three in the 20th Century), of the destruction of three Slav federations and the reunification of Germany under an RC camarilla (Kohl, Genscher, Kinkel etc.), the bloody concentration camp called Latin America—Roman Catholicism, even though completely discredited as a political force, is the last hope of the dying empire. Placing any false hope in the benevolence of this arch-criminal institution is dangerous and self-defeating. Russia and China must work together for a new world purged from imperialism and supremacism.
As can be seen from the actions and pronouncements of the Russian government, Russia is well aware of the Bannonite trap and is highly unlikely to fall for it. Why? Simply because Trump’s actions have been as anti-Russian as those taken any one of his hard-line predecessors. Instead of elaborating on this, I wish briefly to outline the mechanism behind the Bannon-inspired Hong Kong riots. The British (and the French) have been very adept at using religion in order to maintain their imperial possessions. The last governor of Hong Kong was Chris Patten—a zealous Roman Catholic who distinguished himself not only as a sworn enemy of the PRC but also as a notorious Serbo- and Russophobe. Although he ruled Hong Kong as an outpost of the empire, after the handover he became inordinately interested in the state of “democracy” there. In the shorthand of RC imperialism, “democracy” equals the takeover of institutions and media by the RC-friendly agents who then actively undermine the state’s ability to fight CIA-orchestrated colour revolutions. The principal RC agent in Hong Kong has been Cardinal Joseph Zen who has been fighting the “godless” communists for half a century. Patten ensured that a large number of RC-friendly agents remained embedded in the Hong Kong apparatus of government and that many West-friendly oligarchs were supported in their piratical activities.
The Patten-Zen nexus was behind the British involvement in the “umbrella revolution” of 2013 as well as the more recent unsuccessful protests. Hiding behind religion is an old imperialist ruse and the Chinese government had to be careful in order not to trigger a manufactured global outrage. The fact that they succeeded in dealing with the protests suggests that they are very much aware of the above points. Patten’s dark scheming received a significant boost with the election of Trump. To many of us, it was strange to see giant posters of Pepe the frog and US flags all over Hong Kong. The explanation was simple—the protests were directed by CIA cut-outs (e.g. NED) through RC (but not only RC) churches, institutes and schools. Bannon’s incendiary rhetoric was complemented by the conspicuous (shamelessly so) presence of right-wing RC senators (Cruz, Rubio etc.), US “diplomats” and “charity workers” who directed the riots convinced that the Chinese government would fold and admit defeat. Consequently, there was no attempt to hide the orchestrators’ symbols.
For his failure to sever Hong Kong from China and for thwarting the BBC Jimmy Saville enquiry, Patten was rewarded with a chancellorship of the University of Oxford. His last media appearance was a couple of days ago when he criticised the protesters who were trying to topple the statue of the notorious colonial buccaneer and racist, Cecil Rhodes. Bannon on the other hand has doubled down on replacing the EU with a slew of “nationalist” fiefdoms subservient to the US and trying to topple the government of the PRC by lobbying for an exile ex-football player(?) billionaire who is supposed to rule the great nation on behalf of Bannon’s masters. Hopefully, this will distract from the renewed attempts to weaponise Roman Catholicism in order to overthrow popular governments in Bolivia, Venezuela and Cuba. The greatest irony of all (and the subject is replete with them) is that a rabid exponent of the most universalist, globalist and imperialist religious ideology has been trying to sell himself as a nationalist and nativist patriot.
On a personal note, I must state that like many anti-imperialists, I supported Trump against Hillary Clinton. Although hugely disappointed with his actions I don’t believe that Trump is a racist in the sense in which the warmongering fake left aims to portray him. At the same time, he is presiding over the most massive blowback in US history. Having leveraged US power in order to stem the bleeding, he is living a nightmare predicted by many—a United States eating itself from within thanks to massive class and racial inequalities. My humble submission is just a small part of a complex mosaic which can nevertheless help explain why despite the attempts by Soros and various others to co-opt the cause of racial, social and international justice, we must not uncritically run to right-wing politicians and ideologues as potential saviours.
- It is interesting and not inconsequential that Tony Blair was converted by the same priest who later converted Bannon’s right-hand man, the Englishman Benjamin Harnwell. The priest’s name is Michael Seed. ↑
Thank you Ken Leslie! You express exactly: “How could I be so disconnected from my friends and people I’ve been following and cheering on for years? Have I turned into a SJW overnight or have they all become raging racists? ” I will now go and read the rest, but just wanted to say thank-you at this stage, and, very few could actually separate the issue of racism from their own fear. And then you went further, and broke the mystique of Soros!
I’m looking forward to reading the rest. :-)
Thank you for your kind words. Your approval makes it worth my while.
You wrote an interesting article. However, I have to disagree with a few of your points.
You stated ” … media such as RT are actively engaged in smearing the protesters”. I am rather astonished. I watch RT every day, and not once has RT smeared protesters, whose motives are always fully explained. The exception to this, of course, have been looters and those instigating unnecessary violence.
You also stated ” If you think that Soros is capable of organising and co-ordinating mass protests around the world so skilfully that none have been drowned in blood thus far, I sincerely believe that you are mistaken”. Unfortunately Soros is capable of organizing mass protests around the world. He is a banker, and as such is the front man for Anglo-American bankers, doing their bidding. He has billions at his disposal, engaging in world wide subversion, massively breaking international laws. The “Black Lives Matter” movement is Soros organized and financed, used for subversion and ethnic clashes. Soros, of course, is above the law, being protected by his banker pals.
Finally, when it comes to the Catholic Church, you are basically correct. It cannot stand the sight of the Orthodox Church which, by the way, is the oldest Christian Church, and hence it’s name “Orthodox”. However, what needs to be added is the fact that the Catholic Church has been under masonic control for years, probably since the 19th century. This explains why it never goes against the globalist policies of the Western
elites; the Vatican’s hatred of the Orthodox faith and the hatreds which globalists have of Russia have been unified into a single foreign policy front. During the Second World War, the Vatican backed the creation of the Independent State of Croatia, which exterminated 709.000 Orthodox Serbs in the concentration camp of Jasenovac, and this does not include field massacres in which Catholic priests were actively engaged. In 1991 it backed the breakup of the Socialist federal Republic of Yugoslavia, being one of the first to recognize the new Croatia and it’s reincarnated policy of ethnic cleansing. Yes, the US empire is losing power. However, so is the Vatican when it comes to Europe.
Dear B. F.,
I agree with you completely. But given that the US is likely gradually to withdraw from its overseas commitments, EU will be left as the only great power capable of challenging Russia. It is here that the Vatican will prove its worth. America was never the ultimate boogie man. Of course, it is possible that a major change as demanded by the young people everywhere renders all of this moot.
The EU a “great power capable of challenging Russia” ? Highly debatable. Yes, it does have a manufacturing base, Germany making a great contribution. However, what is the EU ? It is a private empire of private bankers, created to curtail the sovereign status of European states. It is nothing more than the civilian component of NATO. Who overthrew Yanukovich in Kiev in 2014 ? NATO and the EU, backed by a few others, who sent agents and mercenaries to Kiev for some classical internal subversion. What is the difference between the US dollar and the euro ? Only one. More dollars have been printed backed by nothing than euros. It is not a question if the EU, in it’s resent form, will collapse, but rather when.
It all boils down to Germany and the EU. People like to point out that Germany is occupied (sob, sob). Now, does anyone remember what it was like when it was NOT occupied? Right, it is responsible for 50 million deaths, of those about 35-40 million Slavs (the greatest genocide of modern times). EU is the fulfillment of a Nazi plan hatched in 1944 and polished by Donovan and the CIA. EU is a hierarchical structure with France and Germany at its heart and a set of ever widening rings with the fourth ring incorporating the Ukraine. Germany is the second in the world in terms of arms sales and is untouchable in terms of high technology. And unlike America (which has had enough of funding Germany’s Drang nach Osten), Germany cannot “withdraw”–it can only expand. This is why for me GDR is a Germany I would like to see restored.
Sorry, these comment just don’t make sense to me.
You are justifying NATO’s Drang nach Osten as a great replacement of Nazi Germany’s?
Let’s recall that it is now 2020, not 1942.
NATO was based on the military structures of Nazi Germany and its role has always been to negate the need for a German Wehrmacht. I suggest you study the history of Gehlen Org, BND etc. Have a look at Das Braunbuch. After the unspeakable crimes committed by Germany in two world wars, it is unthinkable that Germany would once again be allowed to bomb innocent countries again – which it did under scumbags Schroeder and Fischer. NATO is currently positioned where Hitler’s armies were in the summer of 1941 (The Baltics, Ukraine, Romania etc.). If you don’t see a bitter irony in this, there is not anything I can do about it. Germany published documents about its geopolitical aggrandisement in the early 90s–just after scumbags Kohl, Genscher, Kinkel and Waldheim destroyed Yugoslavia (perhaps you can find something about Wolfgangsee) on behalf of the new “peaceful” Reich and the Vatican.
“If you don’t see a bitter irony in this, there is not anything I can do about it. ”
Of course I see the bitter irony in this.
You totally miss the point of my comment.
It is *you* who in your essay seem to miss the bitter irony and in fact to approve of the current NATO stance and its overt threat against Russia (not only Russia, of course).
Which was the point of my comment.
As a half German and Berlinerin who is fluent in German I can assure you I do not need your instruction on Germany’s “unspeakable crimes.”
I have more familiarity than the average person with German history, including the role of the Gehlen Group.
You seem to be A-OK with the integration of the Gehlen Group into USA intelligence services, because the latter ultimately control Germany.
Of course if Germany had been effectively de=Nazified, former officials under the Nazi regime would not have continued in place in the Bundesrepublik, including in the Bundesnachrichtendienst and the military, such as it was/is (and the rest of the civil service and legal profession). Of course leaving these individuals in place aligned with postwar American aims. Plus, they knew where the keys were.
You state that the current role of Germany is “to challenge Russia.”
Perhaps you mean that is the current role of the “occupied Germany.”
As for “(sob, sob)” not sure what to make of that.
I guess probably you are glad that Germany is “occupied” because that means it is perfectly situated to be a NATO proxy.
Re ” (perhaps you can find something about Wolfgangsee) ”
why don’t you find your documentation, since you bring up “Wolfgangsee” (meaning what?) to support your point, which you don’t actually state but which I guess is . . . that Germany spearheaded the destruction of Yugoslavia for its own purposes.
PS. Nazi Germany =/ Germany. But for you I guess it does. Still.
I concur with yur essay and its foundings despite the point splitting s above. Well argued and well researched. Thank you.
It does fit well with all my own research over past 50 something years.
As I read the above comments many factors stands out.
Most complex observations/arguments are not simplistic as you have well argued. The world and its displays of influence from individuals and institutions are incredibly complicated in their outreach and recorded success s indifferences and failures. Influence is the word : not control. People regardless of money influence power and ownership of places of power jostle with millions of other power plays equally as influencial and powerful. (A recent swiss study identified millions of Transnationals multinationals and their CEOs whom push and shove to protect their corner . Ref among my buried achives)
There is little cooperation at the top …… but at lower levels there are some attempts to work together…. eg EEC worked well …. Then it morphed into the EU which has become in practice a largely dysfunctional family in many areas – clumsy and destructive in its administrations There are thousands of well qualified people working within the web of its civil service and lobbying mass s. The EEC/EU theory is a nice idea … but the practice is becoming a disaster – It can be turned around as most institutions can with the right people.
The recent history of world power plays and its observable events over the last say …. 200 Years are becoming increasingly complicated to follow.
To interprete them all holistically is a challenge.
Much is encapsulated in smoke and mirrors.
Nonetheless excellent essay KL and summerisation s.
So then it appears that Folks such as myself now have the choice between anti communist Catholics or Lucifarian globalist.
Much to ponder…
How about a brief mental experiment. Imagine it is 1941 and the world is gearing up for the greatest war in history. There are two choices–Stalin or Hitler. A decision of this complexity cannot be made rationally, based on logic. As a young man, I was ultra conservative, royalist and to the right of Genghis Khan. But, now having learned and experienced a bit, I would opt for Stalin (without a great deal of deliberation and knowing his “imperfections”). It’s a feeling–I am just not comfortable with fascism/Nazism.
The article had bits of wisdom but your presentation of a choice between Stalin and Hitler during the Great War is simply sophomoric. They were both financed by the same cabal that financed Napoleon and the British. After the Treaty of Versailles was ratified in January 1920, Germany was militarily, financially, emotionally, and spiritually destroyed and yet 16-17 years later Hitler had fighter jets, bombers, tanks, submarines, and was working on jet engines and nuclear weapons. Trace who financed that and you will see who the deep state is… The same people that profit from the privately owned Federal Reserve and push endless wars for profit in our time.
The Jesuits own the Catholic Church, the Talmudist Rabbi s own the Zionists movement along with their secret societies and all of the above control China, Putin, and both political parties in the US. Christian Zionists are imbeciles that can’t read the bible and take it for what it is trying to say and thus are globalist tools.
It really does not matter who wins the presidency, the country is always moving Left which is totalitarian and thus Luciferian by default. Israel Shahak described Orthodox Judaism as a control mechanism where nobody even dares to think for themselves. That is communism and that is what humanity is destined for, with the exception of those who submit to the singular messiah from the creator God… Namely Jesus Christ that promised eternal security, my opinion of course.
I am afraid I have to correct you. Yes, Hitler was financed by the same cabal which financed Napoleon, the difference being that Napoleon was financed solely by the Rothschild’s, while Hitler both by the Rothschild’s and Wall Street bankers, including industrialists who invested in German industry after World War One. However, Stalin was not financed by the same cabal, as he would not have gone after Trotsky, who was banker controlled, just like Lenin. Since both Napoleon and Hitler were banker financed, this explains why their largest armies were those that were used against Russia, whom the bankers wanted to break up. Hitler and Napoleon were proxy fighters, something historians still refuse to admit.
When it comes to Stalin, Western disinformation artists have for years been trying to portray Stalin as a free mason, being under banker control, which is laughable, as it was Stalin who broke the power of the bankers in Russia. This little trick was also used to smear Putin, which is also laughable, as it was Putin, backed by Russian patriots, who had Yeltsin elegantly removed from power.
Western disinformation artists
You make some good points but I have to disagree. Hitler was funded by the Vatican from his early days as a Bavarian separatist (nuncio Pacelli in Munich used to furnish him with money personally. Then, there were industrialists from Ruhr and Sahr mobilised by Franz von Papen. Finally, a who-is-who of the Anglo-American finance and industry entered into a highly profitable and friendly co-operation with the Nazis. This obscene crime led on by the Bank of International Settlements (young men dying while Ford is producing trucks for Germany) lasted well into 1944. Stalin did receive aid from the western allies but I can only be grateful for that. Having studied the topic, I find very little mention of Judaism–perhaps you can give examples.
The singular reference I will use is the Bible. You may not consider it valid, but please stash the thoughts for a review at a later date as things are accelerating at an exponential rate. Daniel, Ezekiel, Zecheriah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Joel all prophesied about a singular unique moment in time when God would be with us. That was fulfilled by Jesus Christ. The fact that the Jews in Palestein rejected the old boy and turned him over to the Romans set God against the Jews which were destroyed along with Jerusalem and the temple. The current Talmudist faith is directly linked to the Pharasees and the Saducees. Generational faith in somethings other than God has resulted in a consolidation of power whether its financial or political into a small cadre of groups that may actually compete against themselves, but at the end of the day work towards an ultimate end. You can use your imagination as to who these disparate groups are but rest assured that they have access to supernatural assistance based on fealty to an agenda that is at war with the general population.
As to Stalin it seems that recorded history confirms that he killed and imprisoned millions of his own sebjects. I am sure that if BLM continues to gain political power at this time many innocent people will be subjected to violation of civil rights and or financial destruction just like in Lenin and Stalins Russia, any Chinese leader of the Last 80 years, and a fine example is anyone that the Israeli government views as opposed to their agenda.
What if the Bible is true….there are really only 2 camps…the Kingdom of God or the kingdom of Lucifer.
Actually there are probably too many camps, one being the camp of do not cares, and they could actually be the most relevant, avoiding the troubles of night time and secretly going about their business in the daytime.
As long as we go along with believing we have to choose one or the other of the dysfunctional choices “they” put before us, nothing will change … when enough of us realise we can follow a different/new/healthy path & ACT on that … then things will change to bring about the world most of us want.
If we are so powerless before “them” (whoever they are) than indeed nothing did change. In 1945, everything changed at least for a while. Evil was vanquished and a different world became possible. Roosevelt, Wallace, Atlee and Bevan–they all agreed on that. Imagine how someone like Kerensky would have fared against the greatest military machine in history.
” In 1945, everything changed at least for a while. Evil was vanquished and a different world became possible. Roosevelt, Wallace, Atlee and Bevan. . .”
Nothing in the USA “changed . . . for a while.”
FDR died in April 1945. That was the end of any positive “change” vision in the USA.
Truman came to power, established NATO to “contain” the USSR, started the Cold War, bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, got the CIA off the ground; etc.
He was a hack with no vision.
You are technically correct but I was referring to the first half of 1945 when there was a brief sense of triumph of good over evil. As you say (and this is my thesis too), this is when certain dark forces acted quickly to ensure that good would not prevail.
Both the Zionists and the Vatican have the same agenda; world domination.
Both supremacist in albeit different ways,one racially,the other spiritually.
Both connected umbilically through the banking system.
Both intolerant by nature and exclusive by secrecy including symbology.
Both practiced child molestation through the ages,one forbidding it the other condoning it.
Rivals apparently for centuries,now reconciled in the name of inclusivity.
Interesting that Vatican state,City of London,Washington District of Columbia and Bank of International settlements building in Basel all have similar if not identical sovereign/state within state status.
The author is on the money re everything he says, the focus being on one side of a two way mirror.I would be interested to hear his views through the mirror.
I can only agree with you. It is just that I have worked on the Vatican for some time and do have some (secondary) information. The dynamic between the “Jews and the Jesuits” characterises the US politics and I did try to give a flavour. Understanding both sides makes it easier to avoid falling into their traps.
Thanks Ken, for highlighting the role of the Catholic church in helping to advance western, especially US imperialism. This is very useful knowledge for anti-imperialists like me.
That said, whilst we should not blame Soros for everything, however he and his Open Society Foundation have an agenda of their own in advancing their concept of “liberal democracy” and capitalism against former Soviet-bloc countries which have retained some of the socialist economic structure and state ownership carried over from the Soviet-era and their support for movements such as OTPOR which toppled Slodoban Milosevic from power in Serbia has enabled the further advance of the U.S. imperialism eastwards towards Russia. Also, the backing of Soros, the organisations he finances, as well as other U.S. imperialist agencies and “NGOs” which toppled the democratically elected government of Ukraine in 2014.
Soros and his organisations tend to back “progressive”, liberal and fake or misguided leftist groups in many countries such as mine, and so do US and EU imperialist agencies and NGOs, so I do not take kindly to them.
It’s said that Soros and his organisations support the Democrat party and to me, the U.S. under Democrat presidents have been just as imperialistic towards countries in the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Latin America as under Republican presidents, and despite his non-interventionist rhetoric during his election campaign, Trump have lessened US imperialist aggression and interventions in the Middle East and Africa but is behind attempts to destabilise the socialist government in Venezuela, has imposed cruel sanctions on Venezuela and Cuba and has backed the rioters in Hong Kong against China and has launched a trade war against China and is threatening North Korea. In short, Trump’s focus is more on enforcing the objectives of US imperialism’s Monroe Doctrine in the Western Hemisphere and US hegemony in the Far East.
Whilst I don’t have or know of solid proof that Soros is behind Antifa or Black Live Matter, and whilst I condemn the police murder of George Floyd and the discrimination Black Americans and other minorities face in the US, however besides the mass protests which are justified, however other actions by the rioters such as burning and looting of properties and businesses owned by innocent parties, appear to part of a nefarious agenda by parties to serve their political interests and I would not be at all surprised if the Democrat party is secretly behind them against Trump, especially in this election year.
The last time Antifa was out in the streets protesting aggressively in a big way for several months was just after Trump was elected president instead of Hillary Clinton in November 2016, which leads me once again to suspect that the Democrats were behind them.
These protests eventually petered out, since like it or not, Trump was legitimately elected according to the US election process and quite frankly, these protests, marches and intimidation of people who did not agree with them were rather futile to begin with, though it appears now that the murder of George Floyd and the resultant justified anger has provided an excuse to fire up these protests, riots and looting again, and not only in the US but in other countries as well, in the hope that Trump will lose the upcoming presidential election.
Whether or no it will work or will backfire is left to be seen.
Believe me, I have no sympathy for the vaudeville villain Soros and his fake progressivism. I have been following his criminal career since the mid-1990s and found him involved with every attempt to destroy independent nations. He is despicable and worthy of every condemnation but he is just one small and public part of the problem. Orban did kick him out (bravo) but he is now reviving Hungary’s revanchist claims against its neighbours. The ostensibly “conservative” Polish government is a den of rabid Russophobes who are better off being neutralised before dragging the world into a cataclysm. If someone were to find solid evidence of Soros’s medling, this still wouldn’t change my mind–parasites like him will always try to profit from hope and need for change.
“Whilst I don’t have or know of solid proof that Soros is behind Antifa or Black Lives Matter…”. Mariame Kaba had an article published in the New York Times a few days ago in which she advocated abolishing (not just reforming) the police in the USA. She is closely associated with Black Lives Matter. She was the recipient of a Soros Justice Fellowship funded by the Open Society Foundation in 2016. Just one example.
It appears that we are a stones throw away from being a self policing society, soon instead of calling the police about an issue, a flash mob of youth will arrive before the cops to address a supposed crime, a daring adventure and questionable outcome indeed
Soros is a front man for the international private banks, whose objective is to disband and de-fund the 18,000 local police forces across the US, so that a National Police Force can be created that will be under the complete control of their appointees in Washington D.C.
Ken Leslie, I think you should read or re-read Pepe’s articulated reasoning in his latest article on this blog. He’s much closer to the truth (Removed insult,MOD). That American is “eating itself from within thanks to massive class and racial inequalities” is undoubtably true, but simultaneously we’re seeing it occur in the UK, Australia, Canada, and NZ as well… hint, a race-card is being played and repeated in the social media echo chamber like no propaganda we’ve likely ever seen before.
Pure and simple we’re seeing a class-war, but its a ‘divide the 99%” war orchestrated by the 1%. There are few if any realistic articulated resolutions, and even simple yet carefully crafted “Black Lives Matter” vs. “All Lives Matter” is a dividing point with no resolution.
All the while, the 1% bought and paid for politicians in charge of the US $$$ machine are looting the wealth of the US and the world to bail out collapsing financial institutions. I expected the civil unrest to begin in earnest in August when the magnitude of the unemployment and despair finally caught up with reality… I view the current unrest as a way of subverting and disguising the true source of anguish about to be felt by the 99%.
Pass the popcorn.
Thank you for your comment. I think we are so used to our safe and comfortable lives that we cannot conceive of inconvenience and that someone might wish for change. The fact that it’s happening all over the world does not convince me that it is a conspiracy. Young people have had enough of neoliberalism and having to work their asses of for a pittance while their masters grab an even larger piece of the pie. People are claiming that BLM has no programme–thank God. Imagine how easy it would have been for the FBI to pick them off based on charges of sedition etc.
But of course it could be both, not either/or. As we’ve seen with many of the so-called deep state’s false flag operations, the movements are ideally organic to some greater or lesser degree in and of themselves, but they are then opportunistically “facilitated” in service of an agency agenda thereafter. This is the classic signature of false flag operations: co-opting someone else’s agenda in service of your own, with strict segregation limited to need to know between the two to ensure true deniability on all the players’ parts. A permutation of the “sleeper cell” model, if you will.
Another convoluted attempt to hide the ‘Elephant in the room’. Is Jared Kushner a Roman-Catholic? Ivanka? Roy Kohn? Donald Trump ‘jesuit’?; why was he hailed as the ‘first Jewish President’? Gyorgy Schwartz, aka Soros?
But is the ‘Roman-Catholic church’ any longer Roman-Catholic, especially after Vatican II?
On the contrary, it is often people who accuse the Jews of all crimes that often fail to come up with evidence. Donald Trump has skirted the religious line but the fact that he spent years at Fordham, the premiere Jesuit college and a serious seat of ecclesiastical learning tells me something–despite Donald’s attempts to downplay it.
Roy Kohn was a self-hating Jew who served his RC masters faithfully and was the link between the ideologues (Walsh, Spellman, McCarthy) and “young lions” (Trump, Buckley Jr. et al.).
Kushner is a distraction-a piece offering. People are so blinded by the appearances that they don’t consider that these Jews might (like Cohn) be just RC employees and consigliere.
Maybe Sheldon Adelson is a crypto-RC? And the AIPAC? Self hating Jews they are not.
You turn things on their heads. Now the RC is in the employment of the Rome’s Chief Rabbi. The Popes compete who would condemn in stronger terms ‘anti-semitism’, putting ashes on their heads for ‘persecution’, begging for forgivness. Jews do not stop castigating the Church. Is that just throwing dust in people’s eyes?
From time immemorial mankind has been exposed two primary powers operating beyond their control which they can either accept or reject. One offers the world a way to peace, love and joy while the other, its opposition promotes fear, hatred and war to bring the world to its disintegration and destruction.
Ephesians 6:12 tells us: “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
There are 7 billion people in the world who have the ability to choose which power to obey regardless of what choice the Illumanitti or globalist bankers or individuals like Soros have made. Perhaps these beings exist to enlighten the masses and provoke an awareness of the danger involved in blindly following human masters while looking to them for salvation and failing to understand that each of us has only one option. We are to exercise our own free will in choosing which path to follow and understand that though the consequence of our decisions are not within our power to control, they are inevitable.
That was a highly illuminating article.
My only comment is in regards to RT’s coverage. It seems to me they are trying to attract conservative US readers to their news and lure them away from the corporate media.
I agree but why? Why throw a snarling dog a bone?
Perhaps this is something you can answer.
Perhaps Russia is reverting to its traditional role of the patron and protector of conservative causes.
Since the days of Napoleon, Russia was always more comfortable with French and German aristocrats than “mad revolutionaries and carbonari”. Not sure that’s the right choice. What gets you in the end is what you fear the most.
A very informative, interesting, and well-written piece; thank you, Ken Leslie.
”Trump was faced with a difficult choice. Instead of fulfilling his anti-imperialist election promises, he tried to distract his supporters by blaming China for all America’s ills.”
That’s what always happens whenever there are noises coming from within the US about the endless US warmongering: Of course it is the world that is at fault. One can try to imagine the difference a successful extortion COVID-19 US lawsuit against China would have made in either country. Now, China is handsomely driving the US into the gutter by not falling for its ever sillier, uglier provocations. From the 1989 stunt in Tienanmen Square which was a sincere putsch attempt, then continuing with US inanities in the South China Sea, the reactionary nonsense in HongKong, and the hateful slanders against China about the outbreak of the pandemic accompanied by the obscene lawsuit — all of this has failed abysmally. So when Trump blames China for all America’s ills, there is substance to his claims. He is dealing with a world gifted by top-class leaderships among the adversaries while he himself is a buffoon who doesn’t even inspire the Empire’s vassals.
Last but not least: It’s adding insult to injury that unlike 1989 in Beijing and the subsequent follow-ups in HongKong, the Pindos didn’t need any foreign rabble-rousers to wreak havoc upon their glorious asylum masquerading as a country. Take that.
Thank you for your kind words. I agree completely vis-a-vis Tienanmen–it was a first successful defence against a colour revolution (you also had Romania that year). I’m not sure whether Trump is a buffoon–both he and Boris play to the gallery as part of their schtik. I think it has more to do with the ever narrowing options that are forcing his hand.
Tjank You for also bringing the “Tiananmén-square Massacer” scam up. I have studied Sinology and Chinese history in Oslo. Stockholm, Beijing and Hangzhou trhough several time periods both before and after the “Tananmén” and “Tankman” times and was fooled for five months since I was not there and isolated from CHinese news media. GOing to China seven months later and staying there the next year made me see and hear more clearly what had happened. A great North Atlantic media psy-op after the putch attempt had bouced lik a false cheque.
I would like to fit this very interesting article into what I believe is the bigger picture.
This is a very important article because it describes one of the underlying pillars of what the Saker and others call the “Anglo-Zionist” Empire or Alliance. There is a more comprehensive term used that goes back several decades which is the “Western-Zionist Alliance”. The term can also easily be traced back to and found in many scholarly work.
The important pillar within this alliance is “Western Christianity” in the general sense and which encompasses Catholicism, but also Protestantism and many other denominations and branches of Western Christianity.
The Quran specifically mentions and predicts a historic and grand powerful alliance between “certain” groups of Christians and Jews, also specifically mentioning that not all Christians and Jews are included in this alliance. The Quran also clearly warns Muslims not to join this alliance, since once you do, you become one of them.
This historical and ideological alliance cannot be denied !
The moment Islam stops being a mindless tool in the hands of the Western schemers, it will thrive. There is a long history of political Islam working against its best interests by siding with the imperial West (including Israel). The list is long and painful. See e.g. Mark Curtis: Britain’s collusion with radical Islam.
Interesting article. However, the following article (from a rather obscure ultra conservative catholic group) :
, deals with the 2nd Vatican council which instigated a coup according to the author, in which the doctrines towards the judeism were changed. This seems to be an absolute no-no, as it contadicts the doctrine of infallibility. That does not mean the were saints before or that every catholic now is evil.
Since then zionism has taken hold more and more, with the jewish pope Wojlyta as culmination and the rabidly zionist fractions behind Bolsanaro and fascist Áñez and the zionist operator Bannon. The current pope seems to me very much in bed with Soros. The church starts looking more and more like the zionist evangelical movement to me.
As a western European I am not a believer, but consider myself culturally partially catholic, and when traveling, I love to take the time for some moments of introspection when I pass an historic church.
This is another red herring. If this pope is a zionist/bolshevik, what was Pius XII who oversaw the genocide of Barbarossa, the fascist/Nazi takeover of Europe, Japan and Latin America? Who blessed the Catholic genocides in Croatia and Vietnam?
” Not only is the case for protests solid but all the counter-arguments (George was a criminal, Soros is funding the dreaded Antifa etc.) sounded hollow and contrived.”
The case for the protests can be solid at the same time as the “counter-arguments” being true.
“Soros is targeting your democracy? Look at the state of the Western media – it is much worse than it was in the reviled Soviet Union. ”
The Western Media can be much worse than the Soviet Unions media at the same time that Soros is targeting democracy.
There seems to be a lot of this sort of thing in the article.
In general proposition ‘x’ only disproves proposition ‘y’ if they can’t both hapen at the same time.
You should consider the possibility that the facists and the anti-facists are being run out of the same operations room.
” If you think that Soros is capable of organising and co-ordinating mass protests around the world so skilfully that none have been drowned in blood thus far, I sincerely believe that you are mistaken. By accusing Soros and the Illuminati of controlling the universal call for the end to neoliberal dictatorship, you are removing all sense of agency from a large proportion of humanity. You think they are stupid and incapable of recognising injustice.”
Clever people who recognise injustice can be manipulated either individualy or in large organisations which can be influenced by infiltrators who may themselves be manipulated by other actors. I sincerely believe its not as tricky as you assume.
As you can see – I have deluged you with information which is difficult to deny. Anything is possible but in order to confirm my hunch I studied and dug for information. This does not mean that I am right but it gives my arguments some solidity. Please, if you have any evidence that Soros is funding these protests, give us a hint–which groups, where etc. However, I find it difficult to accept the grand conspiracy simply because it is absolutely paralysing (e.g. the Nazis and Soviets were supported by the same masters).
Another thing–do you know how powerful and wealthy US enforcement agencies are? If you read something about COINTELPRO, you’ll realise that the greatest danger comes from the state, not Soros.
“The irony must not be allowed to escape us—neoliberalism came from the right which has now morphed into fake “new nationalism” and anti-liberalism”
Where’s the ironic bit?
The irony is that the alt-right “patriots” accuse the liberals of destroying Murica through globalism and neoliberal trading policies. Yet it was the most conservative of the presidents and father of the alt right that instigated this whole paradigm. Better?
““The irony must not be allowed to escape us—neoliberalism came from the right which has now morphed into fake “new nationalism” and anti-liberalism”
Where’s the ironic bit?”
I don’t see this as “irony.”
AFAIK it is a well-documented historic fact ” that neoliberalism was born in the DLC under Bill Clinton, under the rubric of “triangulation.”
Hi KL a very well researched and thought provoking post. Most sociopaths and psychopaths out there will adopt and use *anything* under the sun in order to increase their wealth, power and influence. That is what drives them all in the end. Everything else is an elaborate smokescreen. Simplistic? Maybe, but it is so.
A breathtakingly deep insight and an incisive article by mr. Ken Leslie. I will keep this tome open on my desctop display for a long time for repeated perusals,
One very important taking on the whole geopolitical origins of our present plights is this: THe Great Schisma between the eastern churches and the western Roman church started around “1066 and all that”.
The real goal was not to only combat muslim (Turkko-Tartaric) control of Jerusalem and “The Holy Land”, but meant to put a final end to the Eastern Christian Holy Roman Empire centered in Konstantinôpel (or /istìmbul/ — a patoas or pidgin greek/semi-turkish pronunciation of a name meaning “going to the City”).
At the same time, Scandinavia was in danger (as viewed from Rome) of falling into the fold of the easten churches, and thru king Harald Haardraade of Norway (the battle at Stamford Bridge and wiking earl Willhelm (William) of Norandy (Battle of Hastings) also thus could have succumbed england and Britain to non.roman religion. ¨
So Denmark atakked Estonia and the Germanic Knights the coasts of present NE Poland, East Lithuania and presentday Latvia (Lettland). ALl preparing for a Drang nach Osten and to defeat Novgorod. Kiev end Moskow –and all of present-day Greece.
Venice noticed what was going on and started its eastern expansion and saught an alliance the Krimean and Volga Tartars and 200 yers later with the Mongol Great Khan later on. All against Russia, China, and the eastern faiths.
You are the clear case of Quod licet Iovi non licet bovi. You have an excellent view of early European history and I would encourage you to continue on your journey–perhaps write something for us.
“None of these ideals is wrong in itself but is doubly invalidated if touted by liars, murderers, paedophiles and supremacists.”
How can something be doubly invalidated but not wrong?
Easily. When a criminal uses high ideals to hide their crimes, the ideals themselves are sullied and cheapened.
Struggle against the empire is futile, for the empire represents the dark side of human psyche. As Biological entities we are individuals but our psyche is one, a fact we are oblivious to. The Beast (empire) has been with mankind from ancient times. Over time it managed to implant its Vampire spirit into the human psyche, turning us into some kind of zombies. The real challenge is to “re-discover” the true human essence from the best induced illusion. This is the fundamental teaching of the gospels, and the the Roman catholic church was formed to hide it from man. In short , victory against the beast implies evolution of human psyche to another level. an exercise that so far in history was done by a relatively small number of people (Jesus, Ramana Maharshi saints,sages, etc)
Recent events in the USA represents a glimmer of hope & perhaps rare opportunity worthy of exploitation. Indifference to life displayed by the police in the murder of Floyd, caused the impulse of Conscience to spontaneous manifest in the presence of the majority. The beast was terrified, & vulnerable as it put up a hasty response. Unfortunately,the masses failed to realize the potency of what has accidentally been revealed as a beast(empire) slayer ( conscience) . All of those who have struggled for liberty know that the most important weapon at the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed. In order to suppress humanity, the beast (empire) performed a stupendous brainwashing maneuver, it gave us it’s mind. The best (empire) greatest weakness is that as a creature of darkness,it is afraid of light/exposure/conscience. At this point two questions arises ; (1)”How do we as individuals cultivate an environment in us that will guide most of our actions & decisions to be anchored in conscience as opposed to impulsiveness ?” (2) “How many conscience based individuals are required to collectively vanquish the beast in order to bring a new dispensation that satisfy the aspirations as ordinary people (99%) ?”.
Those who killed JFK were not exactly roman catholic.
From Lenin to Putin the front guys were not roman catholic.
The long line of Trump ‘s first circle of aides (generals, secretaries) were expelled one by one not exactly by RC (short for roman catholics)
The communist government of Poland was taken down exactly by catholic Pope born in poland together in alliance with the CIA- the latter not a RC
it s plainly stupid to say that the EU was founded and built up by RC.
Finally let me refresh the author s memory two things:
the anti imperialist driving force of the last 20 years, was orthodox Russia, far different from RC.
The main adversaries of the REAL catholic pope Francis are precisely within the borders of a country located north Rio Grande and south of the great lakes .
And Cuba, with its 60 year embargo, is 60% catholic.
In a quick reading of Mr Leslie’s article I find myself in agreement with half the particulars…..clear disagreement with the other half…and complete disagreement with the capstone thesis topping off the whole theoretical edifice:
That in the current contrived Left vs Right divide…..one must choose The Rioting Left.
The greatest part of my agreement lies in the author’s deep distrust of the Vatican. But their “believers” ……in the hundreds of millions ……………operate on much the same emotional basis as the author….and many of those young rams (sheeple) are significantly sodomized by its priests…..years before they can begin to even know their own unmolested sexuality.
The same unfortunate condition may easily result (I can see it coming.) from those following the author’s shepherding,as it stands right now, without subsequent refinement…..and elimination of blind spots.
A great many emotionally driven errors of judgment.
Speaking of Catholics, I have ZERO use for Mr Bannon but I doubt that Steve is the Puppet master of Donald. Or that Donald is in this thing as an isolated, accidentally “lucky” election winning single individual. He is one complicated instrument of historical forces,as are we all, and oversimplifying him to the degree of suggesting Donald = Steve or Donald = Roy Cohn or Trump = Kushner ……………are all oversimplifications……as is the idea that A Presidency = One Man.
It is far, far more complicated than that.
But the constraints of time and the limitations of language tend to force oversimplification almost inexorably.
Instead of doing the same in some sort of counter-argument over the entire vast Left-Right Panorama (It’s a TRAP!!) I rather choose the option of brief focus within the principal element of The Molested Miasma…that is Catholicism……one of the many miasmas (infectious clouds of disease) of the Anglo-Zionist Empire or Any Subsequent devolution or evolution of Empire on this planet….that it will be necessary to develop immunity against……………….. and must wonder OUT LOUD why the author ignores the Cardinal Vigano Letter to Donald Trump…..in this stimulating article??????
For better or for worse, that Letter seems topical….no???
In recent months we have been witnessing the formation of two opposing sides that I would call Biblical: the children of light and the children of darkness. The children of light constitute the most conspicuous part of humanity, while the children of darkness represent an absolute minority. And yet the former are the object of a sort of discrimination which places them in a situation of moral inferiority with respect to their adversaries, who often hold strategic positions in government, in politics, in the economy and in the media. In an apparently inexplicable way, the good are held hostage by the wicked and by those who help them either out of self-interest or fearfulness.
These two sides, which have a Biblical nature, follow the clear separation between the offspring of the Woman and the offspring of the Serpent. On the one hand there are those who, although they have a thousand defects and weaknesses, are motivated by the desire to do good, to be honest, to raise a family, to engage in work, to give prosperity to their homeland, to help the needy, and, in obedience to the Law of God, to merit the Kingdom of Heaven. On the other hand, there are those who serve themselves, who do not hold any moral principles, who want to demolish…………”
And in that regard, Of Vigano’s Letter to Trump…..I want to draw your attention…… both author and readers……. to this recent discussion, between two young Catholics……of the profound issues it raises:
for, although I have differences of opinion about Aristotle, the Confederacy (A British Empire Puppet Show) and other philosophical matters with both of these Catholics, that see Francis as thoroughly EVIL they do explore the complexity of the matter……somewhat more rigorously than being stuck so much in the left/right Trap, IMHO.
Of course things are complicated and as I acknowledge at the end my essay is just a small part of the mosaic. One does not have to choose the rioting left but one would be foolish to trust the fascist right which hides a plethora of sins behind big words (while all the time working to increase the profits of the mega-oligarchs). My distrust of the Vatican is well founded–watch president Putin’s masterly throw-down above. The constant carping about Zionists, Illuminati etc. becomes tiresome and fruitless. If Francis is evil, Wojtyla (to whom Trump prays in a national cathedral?) is an incandescence of deep evil. Enough said.
No, Kevin, it is never “enough said”……(the cutting off of any further inquiry) …as though I have any sympathy for any “the fascist right”.
Does it not occur to you that BOTH are hands on the same body??…..and yet you come back to saying that presently the supposed right…somehow symbolized by Trump (Bannon I agree….Trump…he’s a little more complicated..) is to be fought harder and distrusted more???
Than who? I already trust Putin more! LOL. But what’s next, serving those who used Putin as the Bogey Man to run Trump out of office???
Who, Kevin, would that immediately serve? The Children of Light…or those of Darkness..(?)_.as Vigano poses Light vs Dark ……...an infinitely more valid dichotomy, IMHO than the “tiresome and fruitless” Left vs Right Matrix you (and not Russia, thank God……..nor the tiny minority of thinking Americans…) seem axiomatically stuck in….because the majority of the world STILL is…presumably…and most unfortunately!
By this reductionism (Trump = Wojtyla) your inquiry may end …….just when it needs to continue.
Trump also held up a bible last week in front of a Presbyterian Church …in the identical gesture made by Bill Clinton back in the nineties…at the same church. A trolling which most missed and fell for, biting the hook and swallowing the line and sinker, as well.
He also wore a yarmaluke at the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem, laid his hands on the wall and closed his eyes silently for a time.
So what is he? Catholic? Episcopalian? Jew???
I figure he’s a businessman and very briefly a “non-politician” politician .…….that is doing infinitely more to discredit and destroy the worst, darkest weapon of the Empire Masters of Discourse (MSM…and Fake News) than his various detractors are…so far, so good…by orders of magnitude.……and furthermore he will be gone in 7 to 55 months…while the further work to be done afterwords…will take decades…for you…. and others reading if y’all are much younger than me.
But what the Orange Wrecking Ball has already accomplished gives more opportunity for more people to have any positive effect in this world…than you or I have thus far seen...in our entire lives.
Which IS a start…… which some people simply choose not to see….although it provides seeking audiences and readers………… in numbers never seen before.
I agree that KL’s arguments and ripostes are inconsistent and emotional.
Whoever among the pretentious ‘analysts’ failed to foresee that, within the very borders of the empire, a significant political wing against the cynical war party and the insane job killing globalism would one day EMERGE, was either brain dried or blind.
I ‘ ve just known one of them.
Hi Mr. Ken Leslie, thank you for such an insightful article. A few years back, I read an article in a website called reformation.org. The article detailed the role of the Roman Catholic church in the assassination of JFK, and of course, the role of the evil Jesuits. That website had many articles detailing the role of the Jesuits in many assassinations in world history. And of course, the role of the Jesuits in killing Pope John Paul I, which you have mentioned in the above article.
Thank you for your encouragement. While there are is a lot of exaggeration vis-a-vis the Jesuits, there definitely is a pattern there that needs to be explored. The point is, history is complex and we can get a good picture of what happened by expending effort to weigh different perspectives.
Kennedy aside, why is the most evil extermination camp in modern history (Jasenovac – just a small part of a large EC complex stretching from the Adriatic to Zemun) completely unknown in the West? What do I care about some nebulous threat by the Illuminati, when such Vatican-backed bestiality is still a well-kept secret?
For example, a number of Jesuits were killed by the extermination squads in Latin America for siding with the poor (see Bergoglio example). Many opposed the war in Vietnam etc. However, there is dark side there which has to do with their original mission–restoring the primacy of Roman Catholicism and vanquishing any opposition.
This is a lot of information to process! Thankfully, at least some historical details are already familiar to me. My only quibble would be in downplaying the funding by George Soros. But he is one thread among many in an evil agenda. This reminds me of the expression from Tragedy and Hope, that the international banking families have set up ‘spider webs’ of control around the world. I feel no regrets reading of the evils of the Vatican being exposed. Yes, it is true that after the Bolshevic revolution and the slaughter of thousands of Orthodox priests and laypeople, the Vatican had no bad words to say because they were trying to worm their way into the country.
The western Church in Rome used to be ‘brothers’ with those of the east. The Bishops were all equal. But this started to change. The decisive break came in 1204 when the Latin crusaders, instead of driving out the Muslims attacked Constantinople instead, murdering the priests, raping and killing the nuns, and pillaging the city. This is how you treat fellow believers in Christ? First, it was the insertion of a phrase in the creed by Rome without consultation, which was rejected by the east. Then they demand that the Roman Pope was the one head of all the Church. Then it was decided this Pope was not only head of all Churches but was also the ruler over all kingdoms and kings. This entity has continued to morph so that it cannot be viewed as Holy, Catholic or Apostolic.
I have read of St. Herman of Alaska and how the Orthodox Mission to Alaska converted the natives by loving and protecting them. Also how Jesuits in California murdered Inuit Orthodox who would not become RC. Imagine, they cut off the fingers and toes. Then the hands and feet. Then the arms and legs. What Christian would perform such deeds?
When I realized something was terribly wrong with Protestant theology I set out to see if an ancient Church did still exist. I immediately had to face things I had always been taught were pagan: icons, priest in robes. I decided to be open and honest. I wanted to hear their explanation, not the propaganda of the Protestants. And so, I first took a good look at RC. There were some things that did not sit well with me and then the lesser-known eastern Orthodox came into view. The first book I read really set me on my way: Two Paths- Papal Monarchy-Collegial Tradition. It gave an overview of the early Church, the 7 ecumenical councils, and some modern examples. I knew then that Rome had lost it’s way long ago.
Still, they are trying to corrupt the one Church and the world. They seem to have their hooks into some major Bishops such as the entity in Istanbul. I read a few days ago some unsavory things about the archbishop of Dallas, Alexander. This was due to the scandal occurring because of the closing of the Churches because of this virus. I shared some information with my own priest through email. I had read a letter from OCA about the closings and issues such as cleaning the communion spoon or using a new one each time, while attacking others who consider such to be blasphemy. I was very uncomfortable with what I read. So was my priest. His own father recently reposed at 96, an archpriest himself was a convert from Lutheranism. His motto was ‘no compromise’. He was asked by an old Russian priest why he wanted to become a priest because so many of them are unfaithful! He found out later that this is true. And I have seen cases myself and have opposed priests online who were teaching or advancing ideas that are not in keeping with Orthodox tradition. Does this cause me to rethink my view of this Church? Absolutely not. This is not new. Schism and heresy are not new. Every Bishop and priest could be corrupted and all or most laypeople killed and it would not destroy Christ’s Church. It is already long-established. We have Christ, the Apostles, and all the holy fathers and saints and martyrs down through the centuries to teach us. This is the true Church. In the face of corruption and false teaching, I simply look to our history and to the saints. The great cloud of witnesses!
Thank you for your thoughtful contribution and I agree with most of what you say. We all need to reflect and recognise the darkness within. You are absolutely correct about the Bolshevik revolution and the Vatican. They were hoping to replace the ROC but for once, the Bolsheviks did the right thing. Of course, Edmund Walsh was there leading a “charity mission” only to be chucked out when it transpired that he was spying and sending his reports via the German embassy.
No, Craig Mouldy, the “decisive break” first came in 1054 AD with the Great Schism initiated by Pope Leo IX.
I stopped reading Ken Leslie’s wordy essay where he showed his profound ignorance, – gratuitous ignorance in the age of the internet – by writing this gem:
“To my Soros-hating friends: If you think that Soros is capable of organising and co-ordinating mass protests around the world so skilfully that none have been drowned in blood thus far, I sincerely believe that you are mistaken.”
Leslie wrote obscurely. He may be saying that the “revolutions” which Soros instigated were not violent, whih is entirely false. Leslie may be saying that Soros is incapable of starting all these revolutions. Either of those statements is obviously false. The essay is a wordy mish-mash of truths, some gems (e.g. Bergiglio unmasked), but also too many lame inferences. I think the writer is British, and it shows.
Let’s focus on Soros and his revolutions, in case anyone thinks one billionaire pyromaniac with the backing of the United States government could not do very much. Soros and his shadowy organizations often work covertly, so one has to trudge through the evidence. I know Soros was involved in these, but it’s a partial list:
Bulldozer Revolution (Yugoslavia, 2000);
Rose Revolution (Georgian Republic, 2003) which was bloody and installed the murderer, Shaskaavilli;
Orange revolution (Ukraine, 2004) which helped pave the way for the super-violent Maidan in 2014;
Tulip Revolution (Kyrgyzstan, 2005) Soros tried to hide his role, but Roza Otunbaeva was a protege;
Jeans Revolution (Belarus, 2006, failed) Not violent but only because the Belarus police moved quickly;
Grape Revolution (Moldova, 2009) Non-violent but it pushed the Communist Party out of government
in the poorest nation in Europe. The replacements were no better, and arguably far more corrupt.;
Green Revolution (ran, 2009, massively failed) Only one death, by a signature “rooftop sniper”, which
would also be seen in other phony revolutions. The BBC went all-out emotionally until the “eyewitness”
moved the sniper from a “Basiji” motorcycle to some unknown rooftop, and the fraud flopped.;
The attack on Syria February, 2011 in Daara started with rooftop snipers firing on demonstrators and
falsely pretending to be gunmen from the Damascus government. A stylistic signature! Here, Soros
and his outfits were small players alongside the half-dozen nations that secretly backed the terrorists;
The Maidan (Ukraine, 2014) Ignited by mercenaries shooting about 100 police and protesters alike, overthrew
a democratically elected government, and stated a civil war, 50,000 people have been killed – so far.
In all these many events, Soros worked closely with the US government and their phony NGO’s like NED and IRI. It’s hard to know for sure, but there are good reasons to think Soros provided the leadership.
Do I need to add that Soros has funded, perhaps even started the BLM ? His fingerprints are all over the demonstrations in Ferguson, Missouri which is far enough in the past for us to have found out. Obviously,
I’m not saying that vicious cops aren’t a reality, nor that systemically bad cops are not worse for African-Americans. It’s clear that years of non-violent protests and articulate statements have achieved absolutely nothing. Just ask Kavanaugh, who was sacked for taking a knee and being very reasoned about it. So we
Americans need some deep changes, but Soros is experienced in breaking nations, not in rebuilding them.
Human agency is important, as Leslie points out, but the people have to be warned with the fact, and that means discussing the real live conspiracies in detail, rather than hand-wave fashion. He’s a Dr. Benway and you don’t want him around.
A well written article again Hr Leslie, i disagree with you in little that you wrote here and what we disagree on is not important enough to argue about. So i wont argue and instead praise you for your writing, it seems to me like your heart is in the right place and we will probably end up on the same side if/when the shtf and the world is again shaken even tho we never will meet eachother.
I truly hope you continue writing and that the Saker continue to publish you.
Thank you, Per. I appreciate your endorsement. I haven’t forgotten about your concerns–it is just that I haven’t had the chance to address them.
This is a silly article. If the Catholic Church is so powerful why did the Supreme Court today make up new law by saying Homosexuals are a new sex and fall under the 1964 Civil rights law? From now on any criticism of LGBT will be met with “creating a hostile work environment”. Hence there will be none, in every media and in every school. They just made the Catholic beliefs against the law. Congress’ recently passed an education act that affirms the Holocaust museums’ view of history. All western history is evil, discriminating and harassing Jews, culminating in the Holocaust. ALL Christians are guilty. This does not show RC power in the US. Yes there are some Catholics urging on anti Russian and anti Communist policies, but they are hardly in power. This reminds me in 1965 on visiting my Grandfather who believed the Watts riots were caused by “liberal Catholic agents acting on orders from the Pope to subvert a Protestant country”. Notre dame University flies the rainbow flag.
Check out the funding of Antifas and BLM.
Being a profound catholic, I cannot follow your demonstration on Vatican’s interventions of the nature you describe. I honestly think these people – who declared themselves as Catholics are and were simply in complete contradiction with their personnal engagement with Jesus’s teachings and all it means. They just fell to the temptation of power and greed. That was not what Jesus died for , in contrario, that is what he fought and at the price of his life. Naturally, relative to God, he was fulfilling His mission toward humanity.
I really have a difficulty following your arguments towards the involvement of.the catholic Church at the level you describe.
I follow the Saker Community and have learned a lot about: geopolitical intrigue, world history, spiritual awaking, tactical warfare and my own personal failings as I make the relatively short journey in this human shell to face God in the end and plead for mercy.
“What did you do to further the teachings of love and compassion for my children?”, sayeth the Lord.
I look down and said, “Lord, I spoke with many but did little.”
“What did you do to expose the works of Satan with deeds, not just words?”
Again I answer, “Lord, I spoke with many but did little.”
“Did you not see Jesus my Son, whip the vile merchants who defiled my temple with a scourge; why have you not done the same?”
My thoughts, which the Lord already knew, betray me.
“I … I was afraid for my own skin.”
“Your friends spoke eloquently on many topics but all of you did little in substance. Your energies were scattered for your own self-interest and not for the greater good of my children. Why did you not organize as Satan’s armies organized?”
I said, “Lord, we spoke on many of the issues that plague mankind; we did in earnest. But the seeds of words did not take root, for there was no plan in resolution, no sacred sacrifice. I confess it was just talk, talk and more talk. That’s all we ever did.”
Talk, talk and more talk. History is quoted and debated, contemporary news is analyzed ad nauseum, scrutiny and condemnation runs ramped across all the blogs in the great, journalistic blogsphere. Why do we even bother, for without unified leadership and directed purpose to overcome the evil in the world, it will continue to spiral down into the abyss of darkness and Satan will have conquered what belongs only to God.
Then just as I have proved, god has very little power over satan, no control of its own destiny, and must rely on humans to do its bidding, leading me to conclude that their is no productive god, only a destructive one.
I offer a response based upon my spiritual beliefs. It is not meant to proselytize but to present a humble adumbration in practical terms as Christ did when he spoke many parables to his disciples.
A parent of a child is a life guardian. The child is a creation of God and perfect in innocence and awaits instruction from the parent as to how to walk in the way of Christ. It is a difficult task, for the child enters the material world filled with all matter of temptation. The parent must teach the child many things to build an armor of spiritual protection necessary to endure the many trials and tribulations that will be faced as maturation evolves. The wise parent will not shield the child against all evils for no learning will be accomplished. The child must experience it and apply the knowledge by themselves to act correctly.
In other words the opportunity to sin, which is Satan’s earthly domain cannot be denied but it must be overcome by putting into practice the faith learned from the parent. If the child stumbles then the Lord suffers the child’s failings by accepting a plea for mercy. Mercy is how God shows his love for us. Mercy is a divine gift; a lifeline in the swirling eddies that try and pull us down into the dark waters of perdition.
Life is simpler for those who do not accept the Logos of God. They are born into this world, they go through all the perfunctory practices of humanity and then they die. Since they denounce the divinity of their souls and reject any sense of spiritual faith they return to nothingness.
For those of us who keep the faith, we allow the grace of God to nurture our souls in preparation for when we stand before Christ on Judgment Day. How we fare is up to us and those who steadied themselves and maintained their armor of spiritual protection will be judged favorably with mercy, at least we hope.
Well done for writing this article, The other side of darkness: Towards an understanding of the roots of the Western right-wing politics !
A wonderful attempt to muster an army of words towards understanding the world that surrounds us all, whatever political, cultural – religious aspects one seeks to hold a magnifying glass up to.
It is the same to try to understand the other side of light as well as darkness, lift the veil or curtain behind the actors, behind those perpetrating evil or working for the good, and there one will not find libraries of books, numberless word data of information, views, speculations, abstractions, but spiritual entities.
Demonic beings, hosts of evil Satanic spirits, light field, Godly hosts of spiritual powers, you call them how you wish, but until one is prepared to give a name, you will not call them out, and be able to effectively work with the world of good or evil , but simply continue to mount up endless words..
There are writers and clear thinkers now, and on Saker’s too, who seem to be trying to steer understanding and conversation towards an understanding of these roots, and that people are too fearful, reluctant, or obstinate to look at and address with the same informed, objective mindset as the world of so called reality, that one tries to grasp and understand, but just goes round and round in circles, heaping up more and more words because one is avoiding the fact that life is real, and primarily being, spirit.
Chaos is seeded through the proliferation of information, and within the endless clever play and dance of words, divisive power, when we need to move towards the light of healing.
There is no paradise neither hell out there.
Nuke them to oblivion.
So it is so it must be.
Many comments for Ken Leslie, but first and foremost is a commendation for bringing the Vatican / extreme right-wing political influence of the Catholic Church somewhat up to date. Avro Manhattan, and others, did so 60-70 years ago. Personally, I could care less what an organized, or semi-organized religion does within its own contained and circumscribed circle of thought…that is one thing. If any…and I mean ANY…religion advocates political and economic prerogatives that advance its particular world-view, then it is time to hold them to account. In the case of the Vatican, it is grossly encompassed within the concept of “clericalism”. To repeat myself, I have no problem with, proverbally, “How many angels may sit on the head of a pin”. But with regard to how public tax dollars are collected and spent, just stay the hell out of it. It’s none of your business. Keep any religious advocacy out of the realm of secular politics and economics. And then there is Israel and the many times it has stabbed USA in the back….Lavon Affair (1954), NUMEC, Suez Canal (1956), Jonathan Jay Pollard (among others), USS Liberty attack (June 8, 1967), and these instances just for starters….maybe AIPAC / ADL should consider giving USAers a break and just shut their mouths up.
This is a very thoughtful article, especially the connection to the Catholic church. However, Catholic countries (Poland etc.) became left wing bastions after World War II. It seems to me that the conventional right wing, left wing terminology points to a Jewish perspective of things. Left wing being controlled by Jews. Right wing being anti-Jewish. As for the average citizen just trying to support himself and his family, he is totally screwed by both the right wing and the left wing. In either case the government runs things to the detriment of the average citizen. The only people affected differently are Jews. Since they generally control the western media, this right & left dialogue is Jewish centered and is meaningless to the average Joe.
This is an excellent piece, and it was about time someone put the current Zionism panic (hysteria?) in context with other, far older evils, that are every bit as nasty and malicious as Zionism. Although, it must be said, that ever since the State of Israel came into being, and especially over the past three or four decades, Zionism has played a particularly destructive role in global politics and culture.
But in my opinion none of this Zio/RC/Nazi/Illumi/Fasci stuff gets even close to the absolute root of all evils, which is the rule of very few humans over the rest of the planet, nature and humanity by means of ownership, control, use and exploitation of practically everything there is, including all of human labour, intellect, creativity, enthusiasm, idealism etc., and that “class” is the only the term there is to describe this relationship. Philosophically, class transcends everything, and in this context religions, cults, belief systems, educations, cultural twists & turns etc. only serve to secure class rule.
My one minor complaint with this article is that the Soviet Union didn’t “fall”. After 7 decades of war, sabotage, subversion and propaganda, the U.S.S.R. was deliberately destroyed by its corrupt leader. I wish, people wouldn’t ‘fall for the fall fallacy’ so easily.
And lastly, something funny. Here’s Steve ‘rosie’ O’Bannon:
Thank you Ken for this useful and much needed article. Your article is quite unique in that it mentions something less than 1% of alt-commentators are saying. For a voracious reader like myself and someone relatively new to alt-media, it has been very very difficult to understand how so much can be attributed to Soros and even more difficult to understand why practically no-one talks or lays bare Steve Bannon’s ideas and motivations. This muddies the water significantly and keeps much of the Left and Right alt-media poking in the dark and leading it’s followers blindly.
Thank you very much. That is exactly the point. If you uncritically accept one of these two templates, you will certainly go wrong. The question is what are most of us who are not RC or neocon (ex-Trotskyite) to do? Isn’t it time to charge through the horns of the cancerous dilemma? This also addresses the point made by Joe Johnson above.
hamz, you’ve not been around long lol. Steve Bannon has been truly unmasked on The Saker site last year already. I have not had time to connect the RC church that our writer talks about here, with Steve, but he is deep in there.
James Forrestal was assassinated. He opposed the recognition of Israel as a state and that was his undoing. He was targeted by Jews, not Communists. Ditto for John Kennedy, he opposed the Israeli nuclear program, ordered the issue of silver certificates, opposed the Vietnam War, intended to dismantle the CIA, but it was the Jews who arranged his death at the hands of willing accomplices such as LBJ and the CIA.
According to the alt-right mythology, Forrestal was assassinated but this has never been proven. Even if so, would it not have been justified by Forrestal’s links with various Nazi conspiracies and funders? Kennedy? 90% of his story is a myth. His speeches in Senate were blood-curdlingly awful and he was one of the premier members of the Vietnam lobby (a RC cabal behind Diem). One crazed right winger and one “liberal” both somehow dispatched by Jews. And it wasn’t a Jew who brought down McCarthy but a Serb, Milo Radulovich.
You did read my point about Forrestal funding the Uniate Nazis in the Ukraine? Apparently, Russian “partnyor” Trump is doing the same 70 years later. From today’s RT:
Ukraine receives Javelin anti-tank missiles & other US military aid worth $60mn – embassy
Bannon’s partner in crime is neocon Frank Gaffney who sees Muslim conspiracies everywhere and aims to overthrow Chinese government. Do you think he’s Jewish? No, he’s RC and an alumnus of Edmund J. Walsh school of diplomacy.
I could go on all day.
Kennedy and Reagan were the two presidents who took the world to the very brink of a nuclear Armageddon (1962 and 1983). I’ll end here.
Thank you for this. I will be 65 in August, live in a minivan being gangstalked (zersetzung) by police, the Army of Weaponized Morons (America’s brown shirts), all government agencies and businesses in a red state. Things are about to get a lot worse here with the economic downturn due to the pandemic. I’ve understood for a long time due to the things I have been through such as working in a remote villlage in Alaska where the Native women are raped and the men are not charged or arrested. I learned it is true, if you are on the side of the oppressed you will be treated like the oppressed. I learned telling the truth is considered a crime. Over time it was clear we live in an oligarchy, a psychopathocracy and inverted totalitarianism. I studied the propaganda streams aimed at the right wing in 2018, researched authoritarian followers, this is when I realized this country was in big trouble.
Thank you for your heart-warming story. There is nothing I can add.
The fact you don’t realize the U.S. government created these race riots deliberately shows just how little you know of the actual situation in the world right now. Russia, China, America, France, and Britain (with each country’s satellites) have jointly ruled the world since the military defeat of the Axis powers.
Do you seriously not comprehend how each country’s government and their propaganda arm, the international media empires, control almost every aspect of every narrative in almost every country?
You cannot see how Covid-19 was a fantasy story, and you cannot see how the race riots are being engineered from the top. They’ve run this program before.
Watch Germany light the match again, one last time. Come to think of it, Erdogen may just come to the conclusion he’s going to upset the apple cart for everyone just because no one takes him seriously. Since Germany is cucked beyond repair, my money’s on Erdogen.
The world does not truly shift into a new era until Europe and Russia are engulfed in a giant war. Out of the ashes of Eurasia (for which the Russian state and Orthodox hierarchy can forever be blamed), a world power will emerge. It will take ALL the territory that was formerly held by the Roman Empire, but this time it will take Eurasia as well. There’s a good chance it will also hold sway over Central Asia.
Such are the fortunes of life that await the patient man. Everybody wants to rule the world, but it won’t be any of the present old men whose only religion is degeneracy.
It seems to me that the empire is about to collapse very soon.