As most of you are well aware, this blog has taken on almost all the most powerful lobbies currently in existence: the Israel lobby, the Military-Industrial Complex, the Oil and Energy lobby, the Hillary gang, the various militarists whose livelihood depend on warfare and the so-called “liberals” both in Russia and the USA. Likewise, I have denounced the various racist movement (Alt-Right & Co.) out there who try to capitalize on the current social tensions to distract from the real problems of our world and who want to redirect our anger at immigrants or non-White races. Today I am posting a Russian video (well, two videos put together into one) which not only gives you a very good insight as to what Russians really think about what can fairly be called the “Homo Lobby”, but also gives you an excellent primer as to how the Western societies shifted from a rather illiterate dislike (the term “phobia” is way too loaded to be used, just like the word “gay”) of homosexuals to an equally illiterate glorification of this phenomenon.
I have mentioned the topic of homosexuality, only in passing, a few times on the blog and each time this resulted in a tsunami of hate-mail and accusations of “phobia” on my part. I am under no illusions that this latest post and the articles which will follow it will result in even more hate mail than usual. Have you also noticed that almost nobody dares to touch this issue? In France, Alain Soral once even declared that the Homo Lobby is even more powerful than the CRIF (the French rough equivalent of AIPAC). He is right. After all the other labels which the various Saker-haters have hurled at me, “homophobe” is now going to be next. And that’s fine. If anybody seriously believes that I fear or hate (the two meanings of “phobia”) homosexuals – fine. I frankly don’t care because those who feel the need to use such labels are not trying to argue, they are simply trying to shut others up. That won’t work with me. Never has. Never will.
For the time being, I leave you with this video which will be an excellent introduction to this topic.
YouTube version (in the hope that YT does not immediately censor it – I am not holding my breath on this one!):
and, just in case YT does what it typically does nowadays, here is a fallback RuTube version of the same video:
Step-by-step Blue-print of homo-sexuality
“After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s”
I’m very interested to know the personal life (their parents, belief of their parents, child age) of Marshall Kirk; Hunter Madsen and another important homo-sexual and pedophile promoter John Money.
Can anybody fill me with authentic source. As I do believe these three person, carries the very first and basic links of current homo-sexual epidemic.
There is no homosexual ‘epidemic’. They remain 5% of the population as they have throughout history, possibly since we became hominids. Such behaviour is known in the rest of the animal kingdom, too. Your choice of ‘epidemic’ is simply perjorative.
consider time in 1970/1980. Consider % of homo-sexual in village and % in Middle size city and mega-city.
Consider a city in California, New York and consider a city in Romania (or somewhere).
The number difference of the above considerations will give the basic pointer, that there are some influence, which are vastly present amoung higher % of homo-sexual people. Thus, shows some artificial (external) influence pushed the human to change their sexual-orientation than natural. I called these complete process epidemic.
I am a believer and don’t believe anything Darwinism.
I am agnostic on homosexuality as a life choice. I simply accept that there are homosexuals in the world, there is homosexuality of different sorts (read Mary Renault’s books situated in classical Greece for a range of perspectives on homosexual love and relationships).
But I must say that I think the observations about extent of homosexuality in small villages vs. cities is silly and nonscientific and shows a lack of elementary common sense.
Since homosexuality is generally heavily proscribed and such behavior would be readily observable in villages and might lead to even life-endangering sanctions (cf. the case of Matthew Shepherd in rural Montana), homosexuals with the financial wherewithal will self-select to migrate to larger cities, where they can find a group to fit in and be accepted. Hence, higher “percentages” of homosexuals in cities than in villages.
Use your head, man!
End of story.
I’m completely against of of homosexuality, and don’t believe it is by any means natural. So for this, “agnostic on homosexuality as life of choice”, I have no time.
You have no scientific basis to your “belief” that homosexuality is not “natural” – as stated by Mulga and Anonymous, there are homosexual acts in the animal kingdom.
I have known some gay persons from the age of 5, and it was obvious to everybody that they were going to be gay and any attempt to “correct” it would result in unhappiness for the person and the family. Simply too many cases of this to be overruled. You cannot reverse “gayness” period.
The video above proves nothing other than that some smart gay people got together with some influential gay people and endeavored to change the public perception (driven by outdated and totally false religious teachings and bigotry) toward homosexuals.
Now – to the notion that perhaps they are TOO visible and TOO “in your face” – well, that’s a matter of personal opinion and it’s one shared by many. In which case they resort to hate or deriving non-existent conspiracies for why this is the case. In fact, I often wonder why some – such as you – care so much at all. There are about 3-5% of homo sapiens who are gay. Always have been. They do nothing to harm me or you unless you let yourself become one of the people affected by the wedge issues pushed on us by the oligarchs so that we remain divided on the important issues which would almost all involve the same oligarchs taking a big ‘pay cut’ if we organized, got over our differences, and fought for our rights. So in that way I see you and anyone else stuck in a bigoted, anti-scientific, outdated mindset as the true victims of the 0.01% oligarchy and their media campaign to cover up the crimes they are committing (against all of us) by making us argue about such stupid issues.
This is a non-topic, and far from “hate mail” – I will simply keep in check my expectations of The Saker from now on, given that I respect the opinions expressed here on IMPORTANT matters like geopolitics and the global oligarchies of which the Zio-American-NATO faction is the worst influence.
the comparison with animals is wrong I think –
I am sure no animals have ever been so turned against each other as the gays I have met in LA, London etc are.
they never promoted so much predatory propaganda and power-seeking ideology.
I have seen many animals in my life and have always had dogs. I have never seen any homosexual acts between animals. At the moment I have a 15 year old Norwich Terrier – although having been surrounded by many gay Hollywood producers and jewish gay men and women (when he lived in LA) – and many male dogs as well – he has never showed a molecule of gayness. As soon as he sees a female dog – I can tell he wants to have sex with them (especially German Shepherds – twice or more his size).
I have never seen any homosexuality with cats (and I grew up with 13 of them) – I am not saying it does not exist – but I am not sure that it does. Animals are too wise to think of doing it.
It makes no biological sense – but they do play innocently in a way consistent with how straight (especially younger) straight humans do in non Anglo-Zio-sheeple countries where people have lost their soul long ago and have no idea who they actually are.
Even the gay human animals don’t really seem to have much interest in sex (from what I have seen) – it’ mostly a power/submission game I have seen in LA, London etc – nothing to be proud about.
Oh, yes I have never actually seen a proud or confident homesexual in Anglo countries
Right on, tomo
I have absolutely NEVER seen homosexual acts among animals.
Homosexuality, even defined by that degenerate Freud, is a disease. One can be born with it , as one can be with any other abnormality. That applies to animals as well. They are not free from perversion as some studies of rape among animals have also been shown.
The bottom line is this: there is Right and there is Wrong, there is a Superior order , fortunately placed WAY Above human foolishness and innate lack of wisdom, a Superior Order which has, at the birth of Time, placed the Guidelines, the Code for us to abide by. We are Not the author of this Code, it transcends us as it comes from that which is All Good, the Perfect, Love Itself. Some of us are born with that gentle code imprinted in ourselves, and I dare say, it is the majority. Others, have been struck along the way, some were born not totally differentiated; this is not the place to explain why this happened. But there Is an explanation. In any case, there is an agenda for reversing the Natural (yes Natural) order, and not just on the subject of homosexuality. Who is pulling the strings? Guess!
To day, the real revolutionaries are those who affirm the Norm; they will have to defend themselves in the face of increased persecution. And the real faschos, the totalitarians are those who -though an absolute minority- want to claim for themselves that which was Never for them to have, or to take. The violence comes from that vociferous, arrogant minority, which is not even aware of who is manipulating Everyone, including themselves, in the shadow.
Saker, I admire your courage for daring to discuss such an unpopular subject. Do not fear the stones being cast at you, “…for they hated me first”
Harken to the Chimpanzee community if you are in any doubt about the existence of rampant homosexuality pervading certain species in the Animal Kingdom, certainly amongst males.
One has witnessed the most violent and vicious activity via a number of documentaries in the past; albeit focusing on certain “tribes”, apart from intercennal violence (just like humans) culminating in sexual activity, and often cannibalism (just like humans, albeit earlier iterations).
And you have no basis for your belief that homosexuality is natural either.
It is also not true that 3-5% of humans are gay. The geographical distribution varies GREATLY, showing that it is not a natural occurrence, but an environmental effect. There are famous studies performed by Malinoski which showed that in primitive, uncivilized societies there was NO homosexual behavior at all, until church moved in and separated boys from girls- than, it appeared for the first time.
In the end, you are the bigoted, anti-scientific true victim of the oligarchy. Funny how it is always those accusing others of something are actually that very thing themselves. Just like the bible says “You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye”
You clearly have not read The Book of Matt by Steve Jimenez. Ten years in the writing, he showed that Matt knew one of his murderers intimately. Together they did meth and were male prostitutes.
MM is a perfect example of how propaganda works. Such behaviour is not as MM pretends. No doubt there is a disinfo campaign going on.
Jane Goodall said ‘we’ve never seen homosexuality in chimpanzees in the wild’. Note the ‘in the wild’ part.
It is a little more complex, I fear. There is homosexuality, bisexuality, asexuality and heterosexuality among humans, and various behaviours that everyone, more or less, accepts as ‘perversions’. The last include paedophilia, coprophilia, sado-masochism, necrophilia etc. Jane Goodall obviously was studying chimpanzees, not bonobos.
Does anybody really know its 5% today let alone what the number has been through history? I would say that the number is much much higher today than it has been in the past. Particularly in Western societies which actively encourage homosexuality. If you encourage and reward a behavior while at the same time reducing the risks that go with it, you will get more of it. If, as appears to be the case, sexuality is a combination of nature and nurture you should expect more of previously aberrant sexualities as nurture becomes more permissive.
Thanks for brave article.
I think many of today negative issues have spiritual background.
Gender is one of them and spiritual undertones are bit more transparent. Begin rainbow facade there is a plethora of evil.
Recently there was a Christian pastor arrested on streets of Toronto. While preaching to small gathering he was attacked by “capitalized alphabet” gang and and wrongfully handcuffed by police and taken away.
Devil protects his creation.
One question I have is how did we get here?
The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing
We got here bit by bit, which is the proof of it being on a long timeline, longer than an average lifespan.
Homosexuality is unnatural for humans, and probably for other species too, but I only care about humans for now. Animals can do as they please.
How did we get here?
It started by the Devil pretending not to exist. Obviously, the devil also needed God not to exist either, at least in the eyes of men. Hence, atheism and false belief that even without God, humans would know the difference between right and wrong. No, they would not.
Then, once God was removed, the rest was much easier.
Oh, and lets not discount the most important development of all – destruction of family and children. Kids who don’t grow up in a healthy environment will not be healthy kids. If we noticed that children are more and more confused in all ways, sexuality included (not just homosexuality, but their early involvement in sex is worrying too), we would have to come to the only conclusion possible: both parents working and kids being raised by the state is a bad idea. But that would make many rich people less rich and would allow for the entire planet to prosper, and devil does not like that.
So we accept that it is “normal” to give up your own children to someone else to pretend to care for them, and we raise entire armies of degenerate morons who will gladly follow whatever those who raised them tell them to do.
Welcome to the brave new world of which LGBTQ is just a small, but important, part.
As a rough quote, ‘Those whom the gods will destroy, they first make mad.’
Quite frankly I don’t give a damn what you do behind your closed doors as long as you have a signed release from the goat and insurance on the Valencia dancing slippers, the two Perry Como records, the silver spoons, the tongs and the Buddha vase. However, I am not going to have to explain to our (no longer that young) children (when they are finally allowed to come to us) why two men or two women are being amorous in public, just like I will never agree with normal couples being amorous in public. To give an idea of this family’s publik decorum, my wife has kissed me on the lips in public precisely four times in 15 years, to whit, when we got married the first time, Church of Foros, the second time, ZAGS, and the two times I’ve come home from war. We do often hold hands when walking in public (gasp!) and we have been known to give each other a smooch on the cheek when decorum demands.
If one is so insecure, or to be honest so mentally ill, as to try to attract attention in public with a generally frowned upon behavioral aboration then kindly keep your insecurity behind your closed doors, or we will keep your problems behind the closed doors of Yellow House. Otherwise, use that Viktorian concept of public behavior: What ever you do, don’t frighten the horses in the streets.
Personally, I view homosexuality as an anomaly, rather like being born with 8 or 12 toes . Anomalies happen in nature, but they are not norms. The anomaly can be humanly abused, as in the case of males fornicating, in which case it is an aberration, which normally causes disgust at the act, and which is why it is condemned in Scriptures. The Scriptures do not condemn affection between the same sex, only the sexual act. The option is to renounce that possibility, but moderns hate renunciation and sacrifice for religious reasons. By definition a modernist is a rebel towards injunctions that are religious. Atheist modernists are believers in their autonomy, which is ontologically absurd.
I’m afraid that the act you find so abhorrent is practised by straights as well. And, don’t worry-no-one is proposing to make it compulsory.
The way I look at homo’s is they are people who have responded to the programming, and conformed to the programmers aims. I have no doubt it is intentional control and little, to nothing, to do with genes – other than the very small amount of people who are hermaphrodites.
Tiu, there is more to it than programming. It is also the environment. You can two and two together by watching your mainstream media. One of the studies claimed that there was an increase in births of homosexual babies shortly after the WWII ended, which suggested that pregnant women were subjected to intense exposure to the stress of bombing. Also, as you say, there are numerous studies showing mis-wired brain sections in true homosexuals.
Otherwise, you can’t get a job in Hollywood or any main stream media outfit, unless you at least declare your support to LGBT.
In the end, I agree with what Aus said. I can count on the fingers of my hand, the times when I showed even the slightest affection for my wife in public. It’s nobody’s business.
when it comes to Hollywood – it’s not even enough to go to bed with any number of ugly, fat, inbred looking and disgusting characters like that Weinstein character of MiraMax.
My former roommate (a very talented, educated and pretty girl (you can see her these days doing a commercial for probably the most famous toothpaste in the world) dated one of the most famous (Jewish of course) and powerful producers in Hollywood (Big Bukowski, Berlin etc). He never wanted to help her in any way (although he wanted to marry her – but she dumped him).
For her birthday he gave her a 500$ or so voucher for beauty spa. she did not use it until about 6 months after she dumped him. When she went there they told her the voucher is not valid. She asked if it got cancelled. They told her the producer ex just transferred it to another girl…and this is one of the wealthiest guys in H-wood. You can see how they have mentality of a very poor, ugly, miserable person. This is just one of very many ugly stories I’ve heard when I lived there
” I have no doubt it is intentional control and little, to nothing, to do with genes – other than the very small amount of people who are hermaphrodites.”
Wow, the level of ignorance is astounding.
Hermaphrodites have very little to do with the subject of homosexuality, and the existence of a small number of hermaphrodites—people born with both male and female sex organs—certainly does not explain homosexual behavior or desires.
Back to school!
Or, the dictionary.
What, back to school for the tranny-story-time and gender neutral, history twisting, effeminate education on offer? (I live in Australia and am constantly amazed at how effeminate the young men [for me under 35] have become, especially compared to as recently as the 70’s and 80’s. It’s not unusual to find they’re also on prozac which is what “naughty” children at school are obliged to take here, or they’re excluded from school.)
It is programming, you don’t only need to go to school to get it, you are soaking in it if you watch TV or the movies too. I can agree with points made by Anonius, especially regarding stress and changed environments, (and hormones and hormone affecting agents in the environment) but your comment I’d suggest is typical of a programmed reaction.
Society, and civilisation itself is all about programming and conformity, it can be used for good or evil.
No, back to school to learn what “hermaphrodite” means.
Or, as I said, back to the dictionary.
“effeminate” does not = “hermaphrodite.”
You can read things into my comments that aren’t there if you wish – it makes no difference to me.
you are right – I think it’s the worst in Anglosheeple countries
In Argentina or Serbia where I am from – you are free to do whatever you want to do (as long as you keep it private). If you have sex with a man (assuming you are not like American gays who really don’t have much sex or any at all but are full of ideology, showing off, having sex with strangers (they never want to see again) in public spaces – nobody will discriminate against you – they will actually respect you for having balls to live in a different way that make sense to you while respecting others as well.
I’ve seen it in Argentina too – and these people end up having much more sex than the tranny-like Anglo variety (and not with strangers – but with interesting people they form meaningful friendships etc)
Again, in a place where money is viewed as more desirable than anything else – people have lost connection with our biology, the way we are able to meaningfully socially interact.
They become like corporations, with wrong motives, entering human interactions in bad faith – viewing to use an degrade as opposed to share, collaborate or love…
Once you lose the connection with human instincts which took millions of years to evolve – it’s impossible to get them back. that’s why we see so much (and so rapidly deteriorating) degeneracy in Anglosheeple countries.
And in countries like Serbia – you have so much fun, so many friends (i.e. I am in touch with my friends from primary school – a few of them actually called me today to say hi), you can hug and kiss your straight friends, their wives etc (as they do in Argentina) etc – you get so much meaningful interaction from normal straight confident people – no need to join a cult of gayness (as westerners do).
I know people who create the pathetic gay role stereotypical models – (producers of famous TV shows in Hollywood) – they are mostly or completely drugaddicts, on prozac etc, unhappy with not a rel friend in their life.
Emperor has no clothes – he never had any (but has HIV, syphilis and ddisorder instead) – yet brainwashed gaysheeple are to blind and scared to see
Very well said sir!
The Scriptures do not condemn the normal sexual act (between a man and a woman, the only properly ‘sexual’ act which was designed for generation), on the contrary. They condemn the anal penetration because it is an ‘abomination’=a thing that causes disgust or loathing, for reasons that you can smell.
A great many of the MSN,editors,reporters,anchors,guest commentators,are gay. Many in the screen entertainment industries,TV and movies,are gay. And many of the elites (business and political) or their relatives,and/or co-workers are gay. Homosexuals have the entire Left “Woke” generation as allies.According to statistics between 3 to 5 percent of the population “may” be gay. And yet their cause dominates the media ,screen entertainment,and academia.From claiming the desire for “equality”,they now demand special rights. They’ve learned well from the left and the zionists how to control public discourse.
From what I can tell, and the homosexuals have been very aggressive upon meeting me over many decades, I am the last heterosexual male, and that is my latest and greatest phrase to get my point across to them.
I tolerate them even though I could easily prove they are not only on the wrong side of nature, but a conception of a failed society.
Lesbians are a different story, they turn to each other once the little males no longer are able to service their needs(another conception of a failed society), and once this realization occurs, there is no turning back for them.
You’ve been unlucky. I’ve worked with lots of gays over the years, and none were other than fine colleagues. The older ones were generally not in favour of ‘activism’ and getting in the face of straights. They just wished to be accepted for who and what they are, just like the rest of us. A good deal of ‘gay activism’, particularly in target societies like Russia, is just a Divide and Rule tactic by the West. They tried it in Cuba, where machismo was not friendly towards gays, for a while. Then the Cubans woke up to the tactic, and saw that homophobia was not in accord with its revolution’s values, and the situation today is vastly changed, with amiable acceptance ruling the day.
“They are fine colleagues, ‘they are normal’, ‘it’s the fault of pedophile priests’ (like Pell!). This is a proof of the success of the technique described in the video. Bumbling brains invariably fall for it.
I am yet to meet a happy GAY or anyone who is scared of them – so much for their identifiers and ideology.
They are as good in Orwellian re-naming as their jewish idols. Most gays I know work for Hollywood or for marketing firms. They enjoy brainwashing others
I have met hundreds of them and I have lived in many countries (I have 4 citizenships)
I think you are missing the power of the T agenda. They are above the low-level stuff we see. It is multi-generational and part of what could be called a spiritual agenda. They run things in the West, if not most of the world, and we are now seeing an externalization of the hierarchy, to use their terms.
In my opinion, a fairly high percentage of those seen in the public eye as gay are actually of the decepticon androgyne Baphomet flavor. The power of makeup and clothing is immense, plus they start ’em awfully young down that path.
Yep, I agree with your suggestion that this issue is controlled by the Baphomet crowd, Satanism is the fastest growing religion in the US. The last estimate of the amount of Satanists put it at 1% of the population, which doesn’t sound much until you consider that would be 3,272,000 people (based on 327.2 million population) – and growing fast.
I also believe the Protocols of Zion is a valid document which lays out the plan for a Satanic, One World Government, e.g.: PROTOCOL No. 9, subheading CHRISTIAN YOUTH DESTROYED paragraph 10. We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the “goyim” by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is that they have been inculcated.
“According to statistics between 3 to 5 percent of the population “may” be gay. And yet their cause dominates the media, screen entertainment,and academia.”
I can´t find the source anymore, but Dugin claimed that in a conversation with Fukuyama the latter said that, present meaning of democracy is the rule of minority.
The one Christian Caucasian President who has made a comment about it – as far as I know, I hasten to add – is President Putin. At a Q & A in answer to someone he said of the Italian Leader [and friend ] Berlusconi, “he is being tried because he likes to live with women. If he liked to live with men, they wouldn’t dare to touch him”.
This is the natural outcome of a Western godless corrupt materialistic society. Devoid of any moral rules, laws or culture. They are trying to take as much of the world with them down this dark evil path. If you read your history, it will give you a good indication where this corruption leads to.
For those of you who are convinced that homosexuality is something harmless, natural or should be part of human rights/freedom, be assured that homosexuality is one of the weapons of the Satanic Western-Zionist alliance. The two are inseparable.
Harry_Red, this wide ranging insanity goes beyond western Zionist alliance and I don’t think it is the pinnacle yet. There is more to come in various forms ranging from entertaining stupidity to cold blooded brutality.
Teen Who Became Trans Woman Now Prefers Living as a Diaper-Wearing Baby
LGBT horrors: Lesbians stab innocent nine-year-old son to death after trying to make him “transgender” by cutting off his genitals at home
In not so distant past this would trigger outrage, not anymore
Better still: For those of you who are convinced that homosexuality is something harmless, natural or should be part of human rights/freedom, be assured that it won’t stop there. Pedophilia, necrophilia, sodomy, incest are all to be embraced by Liberal Imperialism as legitimate, very progressive lifestyles facing horrible oppression courtesy of ’totalitarianism’. As usual, Saudi Arabia won’t have to worry. The garbage will be hurled against the Axis of Resistance in general — Russia, China, and Iran in particular.
Anna Skok. Dentv.ru, Ollie Richardson, StalkerZone, thank you for the program and the subtitles and translations.
It is vitally important to have this case study laid bare so we can see how media has been used to mind-massage the public with the ideologies of Liberalism and the many subsets of its deviant practitioners.
The utter destruction of a society begins with the falsification of scientific facts, eternal norms and core values.
The history of the movement from Stone Wall to the present has never had a more calm and clear presentation as this video, both parts.
We see how half the Russophobia is based on the social resistance to the homosexual life style foisted upon Russian culture. The other half is the Orthodox religion, citadel of Christianity, and thus, target of hatred.
Thanks for this video to all who worked on it.
And to Saker, this presentation now belongs to the Vineyard, consistent with your generous view that Truth spoken must be heard.
This clear history needed a home. It needed the translation and subtitles. You are to be thanked, also.
Three quarters of an hour and not one derogatory word or phrase. Simply the facts. Superb!
I have watched twenty minutes which was enough to confirm what I had suspected, that having LGBT lifestyles forced upon us as the norm has been a conspiracy. Whenever I see something that goes against logic or facts, and presented with hysteria as in , “Everybody must believe this and believe it now.” I assume it originates at one particular source.
Perhaps the last twenty five minutes will identify the source and provide a reason why.
I can provide my guess regarding the reason for all the different, hysterical, abnormal behaviors we are supposed to embrace: Each one destroys the fabric of the family unit which is the basis of our civilization. Where there is a void, there is opportunity for other persons to step in and assume control, and not for my best interests, either.
Being gay is a ‘norm’ only for gays. They, like all groups, ought to be accepted for what they are, so long as they do not harm others. The ‘gay agenda’ on the other hand, is plainly a tool to subvert societies that have not yet accepted gays as ‘fully’ as the West, where gays were persecuted only a generation ago, demands. It is just grist to the Western propaganda hate-machine, and probably explains the extreme Russophobe hatred of the likes of the hideous Masha Gessen and Rachel Madcow. The only way to avert internal subversion and hate-mongering abroad is, in my opinion, acceptance of gays, and total rejection of the ‘gay agenda’ and the Western NGOs and local compradores who use it as a weapon. Ordinary gay people are not to blame for the malevolence of the West and its stooges.
The West should not impose anyone to acceptance anything they do not want, just like no one else should impose anything on the West.
Unfortunately, the West will keep imposing on others whatever they want until they have become completely corroded from within. Only then will they be unable to keep imposing their dominion on others.
especially considering how lost these trend makers in the west are (i.e. the producers of famous TV shows etc). If you were to meet them personally you would be very disappointed with how insecure, unhappy, addicted to drugs, alcohol etc these people are and how very few of them have any real friends in their lives. Especially the gay ones.
Mania they promote is not happiness – but a caricature of it.
I agree with you Mulga. What is the problem with people who do no harm to others. The video does raise the interesting issue of active propagandizing to change society, that obviously has occurred with the emphasis on gay lifestyles in the media. Could this not be compared to the Christian missionaries who still go about, in society and in indigenous societies desperate to convert others to their own creed in order to boost their own hope they will achieve salvation. Who needs either group. Do unto others as you would have them do to you.
“Each one destroys the fabric of the family unit which is the basis of our civilization. ”
I guess the same could be said of divorce; single motherhood; loss of parent through death; loss of parent—including functional parent—through war; loss of functional parent/family through physical abuse; loss of family function/fabruce through abuse of drugs and alcohol; loss of family function through homelessness of family, resulting from unemployment, substance abuse; or possibly from wildfires (thousands of homes destroyed in California—living in a shelter or maybe in best case with relatives is definitely a challenge to “fabric of family”!; etc. etc.
There are so many factors “destroying the fabric of the family unit” that a couple of homosexuals or lesbians adopting or having kids through surrogates or just not reproducing at all seems to be a positive. Especially given the crisis of environmental degradation. More homos = less births. The “epidemic” may be a response of the species to environmental pressures.
I am not a fan of gay pride parades, etc (also not a fan of “pet parades,” and lots of homos seems to = lots of pets), but honestly, just think about something else! Such as a nice present for your girlfriend (it does seem to be guys who are most outraged by homosexuality on parade and react most hysterically to homosexuality, a fact that a number of psychologists have found reason to comment on). the level of emotional freakout unleashed by “gay pride” looks neurotic to me.
Personally I am far more angered by the fact that Israeli LGBT groups seek to participate in international LGBT events that emphasize civil rights and nondiscrimination while denying rights—*all civil and sexual rights*—to Palestinians under their boot heel than I am by the existence of LGBT pride events, which, frankly, no one forces me to attend or even read about. Why, just today a very sweet and kind woman of my acquaintance who is also an activist on behalf of Pal. rights suggested we meet at the local gay pride parade. I didn’t say yes, I didn’t say no. I just ignored the suggestion.
Regarding the ubiquity of a gay character ion every sitcom, I am spared having to take this in since I don’t have a TV and thus do not watch sitcoms.
I did enjoy the biopic about Coco Chanel and the the lesbians scenes were quite interesting—althouigh personally a thumbful of Keira Knightly with her outthrust jaw is enough for me.
But my main point is that virtually every character in an American sitcom has some kind of propaganda meaning/message. I would say every utterance in an American sitcom is designed to advance some kind of social, economic, or political agenda or point of view. Ditto the structure of the plots. So, I don’t see a reason to get my knickers in a bigger twist about pansies on parade on TV than about these other socioeconomic/political agendas and premises. Au contraire. .
my Serbian grandmother had 4 kids and was a very respected woman until her death. My grandfather died in war – and I was told by my mother (her daughter-in-law) that she had girlfriend. And I remember her – she looked like Elvis – similar hair and she used to wear suits. Her name was Rada Rusova – (she fought in WW2 and used to kill Germans etc)
A very good video, well worth watching, especially if you wonder how we got here with all usual norms upside down. The gays in the media and the fear of them by hetero Democrats explains Russiagate. The gays hate Russia because they resist the LGBT agenda. Most Dems would rather look stupid on Russiagate rather than challenge the LGBT people. Of course LGBT “rights” are the official policy of the Trump Admin, and surely his base will be energized that Botswana recently legalized sodomy. Most of the nominal “Chrisitians” in the USA really worship psychology, so her focusing on the 1973 ruling was correct.
About 20 years ago, I read a short cyberpunk story in which the gov actively promoted homosexuality to kids, wanted all kids to be gay, had declared heterosexuality abnormal as a way fight the overpopulation. Try as i may I cannot remember the author’s name. I am seeing it come true today.
In fact, a lot of dystopian sci fi stories I read in the 70s and 80s are coming true today. It is truly terrifying, but now that Im in my 50s, I just shrug and try not to worry about it too much, it’s the people in their 30s and 20s who will have the super shitty time, not me, soon I will be too old to give a damn.
Transgenderism – a new medical and lifestyle market.
Exceedingly rich men (and women) who invest in biomedical companies are funding myriad transgender organizations whose agenda will make them gobs of money.
These include but are not limited to Jennifer Pritzker (a male who identifies as transgender); George Soros; Martine Rothblatt (a male who identifies as transgender and transhumanist); Tim Gill (a gay man); Drummond Pike; Warren and Peter Buffett; Jon Stryker (a gay man); Mark Bonham (a gay man); and Ric Weiland (a deceased gay man whose philanthropy is still LGBT-oriented).
Most of these billionaires fund the transgender lobby and organizations.
Firstly May I say that , tho I have an Inner thirst for truth. Totally and Sincerely . I am not religious in the Traditional sense. Truth is to be explored in silence ,without preconceived ideas
There have been and are now many Christs, and Buddha’s on this Planet. Lucky for us .Mirrors of our being , Portals to the Divine , to Freedom , Love and all those sweet treasures .
All traditional religions squabble amongst themselves that they are the ONLY true believers, and the others will go to Hell after death . That means You and me …How could I possibly respect such B.S
And what is belief ? Belief is Borrowed knowledge, i.e I read it in a book (“The Book !”) or ..somebody told me so, usually a Priest.
People may soon understand that Believing, is not Knowing …and the human condition is to avoid the discomfort of Not Knowing. Hence we fill our lives with lies to face our fears. The Traditional Religions have a long and deep history of refining the deception . As Adolf Hilter is aimed ‘Tell a lie enough , it becomes the Truth.
By avoiding Not knowing and filling it with belief….we never come to Knowing.
And so we live in the mediocracy , Fear and Bigotry of Belief …tis in our blood.
Homosexuality ….far less dangerous than religion . I have met many Poofters … many I like them , many are neurotic. To me it is NOT the richest most balanced expression Sex . But let them be who they are . I reckon Sex , a beautiful healthy immensely powerful expression of Human condition , has been repressed and distorted . By whom ? …our Churches . Its a power game.
No wonder there is a reaction. And so many Products use Sex to sell.
I agree with the Saker … The LBGT etc movement has been manipulated by those who thirst for Power, in the game of Identity Politics , There are and many Gay creeps just as there are Creeps in Organised Religion and Politics. I like the Approach of Putin that Gay Propaganda should be kept out of schools . Let the person decide when he or she is sexually mature enough.
Sexuality is such a tension in our lives , only because it has not been allowed to be lived in an an honest enquiring healthy respectful loving way . That is between two people… Not the business of people with Agendas who wish to Impose their stupid ideas ,
Kissing in Public as exhibitionism .hah what a joke …in a sexually deprived and repressed society …for sure.
Kissing in public as a sign of love and affection is highly beneficial, to the kissers and society. But ‘face-sucking’ and too vigorous tonsil wrestling is best kept for private enjoyment. In my opinion.
Vice is a monster of so frightful mien,
As, to be hated, needs but to be seen.
Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face,
We first endure, then pity, then embrace.
Alexander Pope (b. 1688)
“Then Know Thyself”
Many believe that homosexuality is “inborn,” but I say it is commonly a choice. It is a choice often made early, and as many counselors will tell you, those who have considered the gay life and have already had gay sex are likely to become full fledged queers; while those who consider the choice but have not yet “done the deed” can be counseled away from this terrible lifestyle. Experienced counselors will also tell you that they have seen gay men successfully leave the gay life, another piece of evidence that for many men gay behavior is a choice.
There are those who will tell you there is some sort of genetic on-off switch to gay behavior. That is absurd, because such a gene is self-extinguishing. Genetic influence on behavior is influenced many genes and it shows up as a broad sweep of tendencies, ranging from brusque men to more tender and caring men, that is to say, somewhat effeminate. Who has not seen the marriage where the woman “wears the pants?” Such marriages can still be a good match—and importantly, the family line marches on. In my direct experience, the male children from such a marriage veer back toward more normal male behavior.
Parents whose son declares himself gay may well heave a sigh, because the decision has rubbed them out. There will be no reproduction, no children. The culture and the genetic heritage of that family will not go forward through that young person. Only the cycle of children and parents carries families forward. The long trail of a thousand generations comes to an end.
Often enough, a gay man turns 50 years old and has a sad epiphany, “Gee, too late for family. I’m gonna die and that’s going to be the end of my family branch.”
But that’s in the long term.
In the short term– if you take away the frowny face–there’s quite a lot to recommend the homosexual lifestyle. Here’s four good reasons:
First, there is plenty of exciting “free” sex with multiple partners, a direct analogy of the straight man’s drive to spread his seed. Because of our rather amazing ability to learn lies and fool ourselves about truth, and because anal sex is analogous to vaginal sex, it keys directly into the brain’s sexual wet-wiring.
Men easily learn to like it, and accept “if it feels good, do it” is their code of behavior.
This is one of the most degenerate areas of homosexual conduct, as it frees these men from the restrictions of Christian behavior…and by extension, any other code of conduct. If you specifically condone the gay lifestyle, you also condone value-free behavior.
Second, there’s no stress from dealing with those mysterious women, many of whom he suspects secretly hate men anyway. Instead he has relatively straightforward dealings with other men, whose motivations he understands and whose interests he shares. Any interaction he has with women is spared sexual overtones, and thus they are friendlier.
Third, the homosexual community is much smaller than the world around it, and it still carries some opprobrium. This makes it an in-group whose members flock to defend and aid their own. It operates as well-financed and self-interested mutual aid society. The in-group, out-group dynamic also helps recruitment.
The community of gays can be very active, asking for protection and sympathy to a greater degree than the surrounding society. Piffle. Gay men deserve to be secure in their persons, to be active in the economic arena, and to enjoy rights in contracts and property. But wait! Isn’t that what we all have? Of course. No more and no less. Despite the agitation for special treatment, they are not a privileged minority.
Fourthly, the economics are attractive. A man can afford to be a sharp dresser or drive a new car. After all, there’s no economic or emotional stress from children. And if he partners-up, the household has the economies of marriage and the income of two male wage-earners. There’s plenty of money!
What a deal.
Let’s see….how did this come about? Mostly through the deconstructive barrage of critique aimed at western men, whose outlets are found in literature, TV, and other forms of pop culture. And through the talk of professional fuzzy-thinkers who keep telling us that “It’s OK, you should just accept these things like your sons going gay, because we’re here to tell you, black is white and bad is good. Just keep repeating that to yourselves and you’ll feel better.”
We’ve had fifty years of lame explanations on behalf of homosexuals, turning our backs on in-your-face displays in the name of tolerance. It’s time to realize that fifty years of preaching against a gut feeling amounts to propaganda.
Consistently-held gut feelings stem from deep roots, in this case basic biology. Our bodies push is to reproduce, homosexuality thwarts (or literally perverts) the drive towards reproduction, and thus the conflict.
With today’s smaller families, the loss of a son or daughter to the gay life is a demographic disaster. When some queer convinces your son that he’s gay, and you realize that you’ll never see a grandchild; when you recognize that the family line, a continuous trail of ancestors going back to the mists, will now stop forever —well, you might have strong feelings about the seducer, perhaps hate. After all, in terms of the family line it’s the death of a child.
That said, people are still perfectly free to make their own decisions about their private lives, even if their decisions are foolish. A carefully calibrated sense of tolerance is part of civilization, so Americans live-and-let-live. But as we nominally tolerate homosexuals, they must likewise tolerate citizens who are diligent in our duty and recognize homosexuality as a degenerate and dangerous threat to our families.
Therefore parents should be vigilant against the seductive voice of homosexual apologists. Further, parents who warn their children of the trap of homosexuality are perfectly justified in their actions.
A few important points to consider:
Rights to private association are normal, and they include exclusion of certain classes of persons if desired. An example, somewhat unpopular yet enforceable, is the choice Augusta National Golf Club made to exclude women. Therefore, if you wish to exclude gays from your social life, feel free.
Parents should tell their children–early, often, and in no uncertain terms — that gay behavior is the road to ruin for families. It’s the rub-out, and no parent can look on that prospect with anything but dismay.
Figures of authority, especially churchmen, should be firm on this subject. Welcoming gays into church life is a crack in the Christian armor and weakens Church advocacy on behalf of families. Churchmen should never forget the terrible drubbing the Catholic Church has taken due to its quiet acceptance of homosexuality in the Church’s divinity schools.
The blessing of marriage should be denied gay couples. Marriage is celebrated and protected both in civil and religious society. On the civil side, the purpose is to protect and ensure the birth of children, to keep society going forward in time. Marriage also involves taming the sexual impulse and channelling it toward protection of the family. Giving gays “marriage” is degenerate because it trivializes an essential institution in Western society. Gay partners have access to civil unions; denial of marriage is not denial of legal partnership.
The Bible condemns homosexuality in several places. It is surely considered sinful. But God will forgive sin if the sinner will repent and change. That person can be accepted into a church. But if their repentance is a sham and they secretly continue their sin, then after counseling and additional chances to reject this specific sin they should be pruned from the tree.
Because of these strong socio-biological reasons, the majority of Americans will never willingly accept the notion of gay marriage.
“Because of these strong socio-biological reasons, the majority of Americans will never willingly accept the notion of gay marriage.”
Actually, it seems that the majority of Americans do accept the notion of gay marriage. Or, more likely, they just don’t care. In fact, I think that the majority of Americans are simply numb on issues like this. We’ve been clubbed over the head for so long with SJW crap that even people that don’t buy into it have just learned to shut up and go along.
Of course they just don’t care-so long as it is not made compulsory. Just why gays wish to get ‘married’, is beyond me. To be as miserable as the ‘straights? One thing I do find grating is the use of ‘wife’ for the female partner of a lesbian, and ‘husband’ for gays. It’s their business, of course, but looks bizarre to me. What is wrong with ‘partner’ as many straights, even those married, say these days?
Tolerance is not the same as Acceptance.
The LGBT movement thinks that tolerance of homosexuality means we must allow our children to be indoctrinated to become homosexuals. This is where the line must be drawn.
Good point, Wild Bill.
@ Wild Bill
go here https://twitter.com/HenryMakow/status/1139311800099454976/photo/1
then go here https://www.henrymakow.com/201101.html
its too much it really is too much and imagine if this is what is occurring today just imagine what Noah was faced with?
Acceptance is a vast door that rare few totally enter and understand .
I say accept and love people for who they are , let them be Gay, Persian , Taoist or Christian. , That is purely their business and not mine or yours.
Did your Master Jesus not say Thou shalt not Judge ? you take him with shallow intent.
At least they are by and large not Nazis and Murderers, Industrial Vandals …or religious bigots.
As for the promotion of homosexuality in our schools ..Let alone its popularity amongst priests
Or the weaponisation of the LGBT movement by vested interests. . that is another matter .
The imposition of gay ideology on others is not that different than any missionary driven religion.
Which is a form of self validation , a disrespect , distrust of the individuality and the intelligence of another human being .
Have you noticed that we are in a time when the suppressed subcultures are pushing back , you see it in our Indigenous people ,it is happening with the Feminine , having been repressed so long by Mens fear of her.,
and even with the rise of Hindu Nationalism amongst the poor Indians who have been enslaved by Ferangi for thousands of years … deep old anger and violence erupting , and Modi is a Master of it.
As this is happening , so madness, pus , anger resentment , extremist actions flare up. Old wounds expressed thru damaged lenses.
Like a Purgatory , cleansing .
When the Gay population feels safe , accepted, ordinary , the need to stand up for themselves falls away.
Same for our indigenous and our feminines. How rich will we be then ?
And then hopefully there will be a balance again and humanity slowly grows up and accepts all unwanted foreign guests Inner and Outer .
As the Lotus grows out of the Mud.
We are all in the mud , groping , manipulating, squabbling , seeking , thru greed , thru lust for power, possessions, relationshps …. and our destiny is the Lotus …for sure , for sure
Friction Creates Growth … G .I. Gurdjieff.
“Did your Master Jesus not say Thou shalt not Judge?”
Exactly, I´m not judging you. It´s God that´s judging you. I´m only warning you, and maybe God will judge me if I don´t do it?
The Bible says very clearly that the destiny of Sodom was given as an example, for future generations. God exists, whether or not you believe in him. The existence of God is not the matter of faith, obedience to God is the matter of faith.
Homosexual behavior is rebellion against God´s commands, and that´s why it´s not far-fetched to connect homosexualism to satanism. Because the core of satanism is rebellion against God.
“The depravity of man is at once the most empirically verifiable reality but at the same time the most intellectually resisted fact.”
Welcome to our Universities!
I LOVE Malcolm Muggeridge. What a loss his death was to the world.
The film makers did not impose structure on the methodology presented. They just reported the highly evolved theory and practice of what is an industrial process. This is the “n’th” iteration of a process used repeatedly and continuously improved. Other instances of this process are in current operation around us: the differentiation of sexuality into many novel forms, the evils and dangers of Christianity versus the advantages of whatever the alternative is, the replacement of the white race from what had been their homelands.
What is horrifying is how effective these processes are. Culture is not genetically transmitted. It must be handed down carefully between each generation. It is clear that young Americans have been completely cut off from the history of our own culture.
I used to wonder why successful and highly evolved civilizations fall apart. I am generally convinced by Elmer Pendell’s thesis (Why Civilizations Self Destruct), but I see a moral and spiritual dimension that he does not discuss. Simply put: as technological power increases, it is necessary that spiritual maturity and wisdom increase to keep pace and maintain control.
Look at our situation: tremendous technological power has been given into the control of emotionally stunted and spiritually empty people. I can readily believe that this same cycle of growth and catastrophic decline may have happened on this world repeatedly.
There is a very good book by Michael Rose – ‘Goodbye Good Men’ of how liberals in the Catholic Church fostered and allowed homosexuals into the Catholic Seminaries (something also admitted to by ex-Communist agents like Bella Dodd, as an attempt to morally undermine the Church which was a foe to the advancement of Communism).
‘A plague of locusts’, as someone referred to it, as the depravity, hypocrisy and outright insanity and detestable behaviour of such men afflicted by this condition is really hard to describe, but is routine. And wherever they enter their form their little cliques, and advance and cover for each other.
This is one of the chief problems behind the sex abuse scandals within the Catholic Church, slowly being exposed by the outing of demons like Cardinal McCarrick, and several men whom the (allegedly) Pope Francis always has a habit of keeping near him – referred to in the press as the ‘Gay Lobby’ and the Sanct Gallen Mafia, and the ‘Pink Palace.’ Naturally all the same kind who can be counted on to despise orthodoxy and doctrine, and cozy up to Leftist ideas and the Democrat party.
Archibishop Vigano recently gave an interview to the Washington Post, again exposing the lies of Francis, and the fact that a homosexual clique pretty much has control of the Vatican, and the Church institutions in America & Germany. No surprise that Francis is well loved by the Leftists and the globalists.
Another book worth checking out is ‘The Rite of Sodomy’ by Randy Engel.
If anything, the LGBT is also propped up by the usual suspect Jewish lobbyist groups, and have learned well from their tactics. This is openly admitted to. But this is seen as selective, considering Haaretz notes how Netanyahu is proud to push the LGBT abroad, but in Israel, not so much.
The growth and power of the LGBT and whatever other alphabets they keep adding is the surest sign of a civilization in decay and on the verge of death. And with that is also evidenced the utter insanity and unmitigated hatred and anger of all those in league with them. They intend to devour until nothing is left.
The population is delusional and sick at its spiritual core. The expressions of LGBT insanity are only the symptom of a diabolical illness.
To document it all would be too much. Thankfully the further they push such insanity onto the rest of the population, the more people are waking up to the sheer stupidity and evil that lies in their midst.
There are also unfortunately many amongst the LGBT who recognize this and are suffering and want no part of where the whole movement is going. Yet they are prevented by the evil lobbies that claim to represent them on their behalf from seeking treatment or from going rogue and going off script. This is why they can’t stand guys like Yiannopoulos.
The biggest protector of priestly paedophiles were Wojtyla (the Poles are busily attempting to come to terms with clerical paedophilia there, or attempting to cover it up)and Ratzinger, both hardly ‘Leftists’.
Having looked into it, the problem is hardly anything like pedophilia, though there are a few cases.
It is ephebophilia – a homosexual predation of mainly post-pubscent men.
Very few women, girls or little boys. But rather teen to adult men – a lot of seminarians.
The gay lobby in the Church would dearly like for you to be distracted by pedophilia, and they’ve campaigned well to make certain that vast majority 70%+ cases of abuse go overlooked as they are homosexual and adult in nature.
John Paul II is at fault for not looking carefully at the Maciel affair. his excuse was that he believed it was communist propaganda. But ultimately he does share the responsibility for the negligence, though there is no indication that he actively covered it up.
As for Benedict XVI, the idea that he covered up anything is bull-hit. As Ratzinger he fought to get control over it from Cardinal Bertone and put it into the hands of the CDF, which at the time was not under his control. Rather than John Paul II, the main culprits of the cover up were the secretary of State – likely Bertone and Sodano. Benedict finally got hold of the reigns and took to task stripping many of the guilty – which is why they’ve always hated him and fought against him internally, and this is why we believe with the coming of a dossier he requested that according to Italian sources deals with grave depravity of many members in Rome involved in the homosexual cult, including reportedly satanic rituals, Benedict fled and apaprently retired, though there is a lot of funny business surrounding his alleged resignation and Francis’ election.
As soon as Francis was in place, the first things we hear are a hushing up of any gay-lobby related things, with his infamous “who am I to Judge?”, and his dismissal of concerns about homosexuality in the church, and his numerous appointments of homosexual and compromised men to high positions, starting with who he put in the Vatican Bank – Battista Ricca – a man with many gay scandals, and was to whom Francis referred to when he said “who am I to judge?” and upon which the Western homosexual press sung his praises with many a front cover photo op.
it was Ratzinger as Benedict who put censures and forbade the guilty McCarrick from going around, but McCarrick and his lackeys openly defied this and continued on, and it was Francis who lifted the restrictions on McCarrick, even when warned about it by Vigano.
So if anything, it is Ratzinger/Benedict XVI who was unable to exercise his power upon a large group of homosexual infiltrators who care not about any Popes or Christ Himself, that look to have circled around Benedict and finally gotten their way, and are out and proud in the era of Francis. And these guys were also active and ran circles around John Paul II
Those are the facts. Anything else you hear contrary about Ratzinger and John Paul (because obviously they aren’t leftists) is down to the fact that you are getting this nonsense from teh same liberal leftist sources who love to praise Francis and cover-up for his cover-ups, because the liberal/leftist establishment protects the homosexual movement, whilst laying the blame for any scandals solely on the “conservative” side as they like to label things.
This is why in light of all the scandals coming out, and with Francis knowing that the leftist media will cover for him (as he winked at them to ‘do their research’ while he ‘wouldn’t say a word’ when confronted during a flight interview as the Vigano allegations broke), they are now scrambling to try and lay the blame on John Paul II, who is long dead and cannot defend himself.
That’s the game being played here. And why Francis is so concerned to keep anyone from investigating the bishops, other than the bishops investigating themselves, because he and all his crony friends are the ones involved, and have put themselves in place precisely to keep the lid on things while distracting you with claims that it’s just a paedophilia problem and that on paper they are dealing with ‘the paedophiles,’ while ignoring the adult homosexual abuse which is the overwhelming majority – of bishops screwing seminarians, of running a fraudulent Green Card operation to get gay adults and teems into the USA as seminarians but who are in reality prostitutes, while using parish and archdiocese funds for gay strippers, prostitutes and drugs, and other lavish personal expenses as befitting a secret gay underground lifestyle.
All things you will never see the mainstream leftist press covering until they are forced to. And then they’ll continue to spin it by focusing on the handful of victims who are women and children – while ignoring the data about the majority of teen & adult male victims. Because the homosexual propaganda must be maintained as harmless as if it were a sacred duty.
One other thing I would add is that the whole homosexual movement didn’t just spring out of nothing.
What gave it leeway is and continues to be the sexual immorality of the so labelled ‘heterosexuals.’
So naturally the liberals who are liberal about normal sex, and naturally ideological inclined to extend the same benefits to their abnormal cohorts.
It began with contraception, divorce, remarriage, sex before marriage, open relationships, many partners, pornography, murder of unborn children and so on…
Sex, primarily for the procreation of Children as God intended, was swept aside for selfish debauchery by the ‘heterosexuals.’
And if the procreation of children wasn’t considered important, to the point that we could kill them if we didn’t want them, and pleasure and ‘luv’ was the main objective of sex, then why couldn’t homosexuals engage in it and have it be a public celebration?
Fighting the LGBT scourge also necessitates that we follow the Teachings of the Church on these matters and reform our lives. Or else the LGBT rightly sees us as hypocrites. If we don’t obey God and treat sex as a sacred thing, and children as the natural result, created by God, and marriage as a sacramental union between a man, woman and God towards such an end, then why the heck should the LGBT?
So any campaign to fight them won’t have any effect without us reforming ourselves.
So keep it zipped up fellas, be responsible, and marry a good and godly woman, and don’t treat her like an outlet for your sexual frustrations and desires, but as your partner who will help you get to Heaven when you both die, where having and raising good children is in harmony with God’s will, and if you can do that on Earth, then you are able to be completely in harmony with His Will in Heaven, as it is essentially a marriage of the Lamb of God to His Bride – the Church, for whom He died.
At the very least you’ll avoid being #metoo’ed in this day and age, where just smiling at a member of the opposite sex will make you liable for prosecution, if only in the court of public opinion.
Very good comment. I totally agree with you.
Always wondering about how “protectors” of the God’s will like you know well what the God has intended. In some cases this may lead even to applying some corrective measures to improve His design to better fit “His” plans. Female circumcision being a telling example.
God has created the mankind able to enjoy sexuality in myriad ways both physically and emotionally. There were always some “good” people thorough history trying to harness this powerful drive within each human being to serve their own purposes. Simply by building regulations of the motivations that no healthy person can resist can create great deal of anxiety and fear in the society as a whole and therefore increase control over such population.
God have let it happen, indeed, because ultimate human mission is to learn and there is no learning without suffering. So keep suffering Johnno, you will learn someday that you may enjoy the love any way you like. But please don’t ask me to suffer from you prejudices and fears too. I’ve got my own things to learn, but to enjoy my sexuality I’ve learned already and don’t want go back because of fears that are not mine.
P.S. I don’t believe that sexuality should be a subject of any political program will it be either promoting or suppressing. There is a little sense in promoting or suppressing nature, the sun will shine no more or less if you place the billboards advertising it or forbid to look at that.
Motto: ” Likewise, I say to you,there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” Luke 15:10
A very good video.Presenting facts mostly from gay activists propaganda and scientific community. Very few religious connections.
The gay propaganda started around 30 years ago , at the ground zero, and now is already in the stratosphere. Highly likely,in another 30 years will go beyond the visible Universe meaning that the normal,good ,decent,balanced human behavior ( including family values ) will be extinct by then.
Another engineered tool of global Deep State to promote death ( spiritual or physical ) on a global scale. Beside endless wars, “global warming ” consequences, war against Truth and truth and building the global dictatorship in general.
Homosexuality,a very bad sin among so many others we suffer. It can be healed in the Church through confession,repentance, fasting,communion with God and people,holy mysteries.
PS: It is impossible to imagine that in the Kingdom of Heaven someone can have homosexual thoughts or other thoughts against the human nature ( which can hardly be removed )…or it wouldn’t be a Heaven anymore but hell.
The truth is that males gays are the most indulged subset of the species. Not some persecuted minority.
I have met UK-born doctors in Melbourne who live together. Each of their incomes is US$200,000+. Because they have no families, they can move around with the seasons or simply follow the money. Working locum, they can earn US$1,500 per day. They pay the same tax as a similar GP with a wife and 3 kids. By following the money, they can earn a lot more. Some gay dentists switch countries so that they never experience a European winter – January in Sydney and July in London.
A great life. Good luck to them. They are playing the system. But to pretend that they are victims or anything of the sort is total nonsense.
Lesbians are another matter. They seem to have a great time while young impressionable girls are available. When they get older, they tend to end up alone. They seem to have poorly-paid jobs. In their youth, they chased the girls and had fun. Well, that is the impression I have. But it is entirely self-imposed. Nothing to do with the societies we live in. We can hardly be expected to provide them with young nubile girls while they are middle-aged. They also have lots of problems with depression and self-harm.
Thank you Saker,
This proves to me what this essay points to.
Fist, creating cults of guilt, then exploiting them to death. I was one of those feeling guilty of disagreeing with the mindless acceptance of what is essentially, not just de-natured, but anti-nature to begin with.
Perhaps, these anomalies existed in the past (as “evidenced “by some Geek remnants) but, nowadays, I tend to think that most of these archaeological finds are fake. These things were placed there to create a back story for the current policies of blind acceptance of things that are simply not normal. We are gently hypnotized into “if it was there for millennia” then this is OK type of thinking. In this instance, I’m not afraid to use religious terminology and simply name it as Satanic; something that opposes the natural order of things. I don’t have anything against gays (and the rest), I think these people are victims of genetic, chemical and cultural manipulations. My biggest problem with this is that the rest of us are supposed to swallow this garbage in silence and allow our children to be brainwashed into this insanity.
Accidently, just the other day, I watched this episode by “we are change” channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGMxpcdd1V4
We’re lied just about everything: Diets, medicine, history…etc. The only way out is to do and think the opposite. Anyhow, this is my solution.
It won’t be bad joke to estimate that anti homophobia might be the pretext for WW3. What ever pretext is good enough for Empire’ war.
Generally speaking gay bandwagon goes hand in hand with western cultural marginalization and degrade to just shrinking civilization. It’s not the cause of course, just one of consequences. Nobody takes nowadays “west” seriously. On the other hand not even dog’s shit is irrelevant. There is some meaning on it.
The decline of Western Culture is based of anti religion, anti faith, anti Christianity. It started with few people of Enlightenment and later exponentically increased after WW2 and especially since late 1960’s. For more than 20 years i have been 100% sure that western culture will be replaced during less than 200 next years. However the speed seems to become faster and process won’t take more than a centure. Everybody is thinking fertility rate to be in west about 1.5. But there are signs that it might go to rate of atheists – to 1 or even less. Post millenial generation is shockingly weak and fragile. Anti religion, consumerism and neocon habitus are strangling child.
in my considerable experience at least in the US and UK – gays have structured their movement of herded cats based on a religion or a cult – it’s very little to do with actual sex – more with submission, hierarchy, totalitarinism and conformity. Also there is a considerable aspect of excommunication – whereby if you are not considered ‘gay’ enough or submissive or stereotypical enough – other ‘gays’ will avoid you and be proud of it.
This is a non political analysis:
Myth: There is no such thing as “gay” culture because sexual orientation as an identity marker does not override all other identity markers such as national identity, racial identity, religious identity, political ideology etc. Besides, there is such a hodge-podge of LBQ-XYZ even if there were such a “culture” and “history of targeted oppression” it would be fractured by internal divisions. There is, however, an ideological techno-fascist so-called gay culture developed in the USA and exported to the world via the Deep State instruments in the press and Hollywood.
Resist it and know what hidden agenda it carries. It wants the minds of the youth to think that it is the ultimate in human development. It is profoundly anti-child and anti-female because the vast number of transgenders are from male to female. Eliminate the female and then one has the perfect “male” world: there are alpha males and then there are beta males ( transgenders) and then there are “breeders” ( biological females).
When the feminists speak of the ills of the patriarchy, they really have no clue as to who their real enemy is–all the homosexuals running the Catholic Church at the highest levels constitutes just one level. The Anglo sadomasochistic elites churned out by the upper crust school system is another. And all the other power hungry males seeking to salve the early always aching subconscious wound of infant circumcism by kicking, kicking out against others is a third.
Again–this is not a political analysis but rather a psycho-social one.
The conundrum that people have over this life style making changes to modern culture has such a simple solution I can’t help but point it out : you’re too fixated on what other people do in their bedrooms. If you minded your own dam business, none of this would have happened. Aside from some smaller cultures this has always been a part of life. Remember England’s Virgin Queen, lol? There are better way to deal with your personal revulsion than faux outrage. The so called conservatives’ fixation on ladies reproduction habits. The religuous based excuses are nothing but sophistry to try to cover a basic unhealthy interest in other’s sex habits. You don’t to like it. But you need to mind your own business. Those of us not involved in this are not going to accept your making a national crisis out of your personal problems. In this particular instance western culture is correct.
Thank you, Saker, for raising this topic. It’s time for some light to shine on it.
I personally believe homosexuality to be a mental/emotional illness with deep-seated causes deriving both from conditioning and heredity.
I also believe that there is a conspiracy behind making the idolization of homosexuality a political crusade. The parties behind this crusade are the same ones who make fortunes out of alcohol, drugs, gambling, pornography, prostitution, and other vices, including much of mass entertainment which is borderline pornography.
I will not attempt to identify this source in this post, though you might easily guess.
I will say, though, that there is a link with the tragedies within Christianity deriving from the “celibate” clergy within the Roman Catholic Church.
Bringing homosexuality into the political arena is just another way to pollute and corrupt the political process and drive more people away out of disgust to further control by the hidden hand we all know is in charge of the Empire.
I have personal experience of these things.
Again, thank you Saker.
Nobody’s explained why we have to like sodomy. We understand violence is criminalized, as violence is criminalized for just about any reason. You can’t beat up someone because you discover he had sex with a golden retriever, nor because he had sex with your ex-wife. We get that. The other part, embracing those who chose sodomy, we don’t get.
Sodomy is perpetuated through the years by child recruitment. All those elite private schools kept this behavior going. The modern media and education system popularizes it among children. So there’s a problem: when you accept or tolerate the pederast, you’re also accepting and tolerating child abuse.
IThe term homosexual is counter productive. Like abortion, it distances you from the facts. Abortion used to mean miscarriage. See what they did? They took the word to mean miscarriage so people would think baby killing = same-as-miscarriage.
Homosexual implies something is wrong, but also that it’s innate and real: an illness. I have no reason to believe this. Yes, a boy can be raised to be wimpy. That doesn’t mean he thinks his poo hole is for sex. Just means he’s wimpy. A girl may be raised a butch. A farm girl, for example. Doesn’t mean she likes carpet munching. There’s no connection.
We’re talking about people with some problems, maybe, being indoctrinated, often by child abuse grooming, to engage in perverse acts. Not just acts, but to become drug addicts and to have barbaric surgeries. All because Chelsea wasn’t pretty and the boys threw spit balls at her. All because Joey’s dad left and his mom tried to make him into a super wimp so he’d never leave her. Now their devote sodomites? Get real!
We’re in a word war here. Be more careful whose words you are using. Thanks for reading.
As an exercise, try and replace “homosexual” or “gay” in this video with words such as “black”, “arab” or “asian”, and you’ll see how simplistic and prejudiced, not to say downright inane and racist these peoples’ argument is. Not only: focusing on examples from the sickest of all degenerate cultures on the planet (instead of, say, all the great achievements by homosexuals throughout history, or by cultures that praised homosexuality — i.e. ancient Greece, for one) to make up a conspiracy of sorts is playing exactly the same propaganda games that very degenerate culture (the USofA, in case it’s not obvious) gets repeatedly criticised for. Not to mention the name “Scientists for Truth” — sounds familiar?
Article with courage, my respect.
The global LGBT revolution started in US State Department (where else???).
It was Obama Adm which issued a secret decrete to all US Embassies globally to promote gay marriage, m.m. in the national governments, etc.
In 2015 Obama even named a US Special Global Envoy to promote LGBT issues globally.
Some Russian alternative media source within the last 2 years mapped the US Embassies LGBT work behind the curtains. Unfortunately I don’t remember the actual media, RT maybe RI or maybe a third.
Thank you for bringing this to us.
First, I wish to state that there is compelling anthropological evidence that throughout recorded history, there is a stable number of humans, who for one reason or another, prefer sexual relations with same gender partners, and that this consistent number is approximately 10%.
So, it should be recognized that this is a ‘normal’ condition; there is nothing abnormal of obscene about it, it is what it is.
As a consistent, and significant minority, people with these preferences should never have to worry about expression of their preferences any more than anybody else, and, in terms of overall social health, mitigating repression of sexual expression is ultimately good for everybody.
So as long as no one is jamming your transmission, I can see nothing at all wrong with gays and lesbians.
However, if seems almost a parody how this group, and their apparent victimization has been weaponized against the 90%, but really, focused on the 45% hetrosexual males.
There are many, many examples of active disempowerment of hetrosexual males, and one can see a skew towards northwestern European males, in particular.
Being in that demographic, I have noticed it accutely.
The continuing criminalization of biologically-based male behavioural traits is … very troubling.
In addition to the deafening cries of victimhood, we can also notice great alignment with the feminazi, while both align, incredibly with the victim class!
I suggest that the colour revolution along with the annexed, legitimate feminist, (now just a hetrosexual male-hatred program), are programs aligned to an ongoing struggle for dominance being waged against a small minority, currently situationally-cleverly self-branded as the eternal victims, who have separated themselves from the rest of humanity, and continue to wage a war on humanity.
The current siege against traditionally biologically-based hetrosexual males, and northwestern eurasian males in general, constitutes taking down the landed fighting-class of society; who will be the first to rebel against unreasonable usurpers?
These, naturally, by biological heritage, especially testosterone-driven tendencies, are the defenders of societies.
Regardless of what people think about it, biologically-rooted male behavioural traits, and the (in many cases correctly) attributed negative associations, it is the historical role in societies for this demographic to repel invaders.
This is the reason we are being ‘taken out‘ to pave the way for the new world order colonizers to complete their take-over of the empire, and assume the unchallengeable controllership, as directed in their ‘religious‘ doctrine.
The subject of the many acronyms-‘genders’ is a different story, but you see how it is an adjunct to the main thrust of the disempowerment of biologically-based males and their behavioural norms.
While everybody should be free to express themselves, sexually and otherwise, the horrific genital mutilations, and enforced programming of the very young in the school system is an obvious absurdity.
So called ‘sexual reassignment therapy‘ for anyone under the age of majority, is a psychotic hatred of humanity…
… wait a sec… I’ve heard of this before?!
So while they have been recruited into the programs for the destruction of humanity, gays and lesbians are just as much victims as the adherents of otherwise affiliation dedicated towards the destruction of humanity.
They should be treated with sympathy and, where possible, exposed to a supportive, alternative (the irony is killing me) point(s) of view on the topic.
I know in practice, this can be a bit frustrating, as well as … (might as well write it)… dangerous, (from a social mobility perspective)….
perseverance. (especially all the christians, remember the ‘love’ thing)
“for one reason or another, prefer sexual relations with same gender partners, and that this consistent number is approximately 10%.”
the most interesting thing about American and UK ‘gays’ I have met, is that their lives and things they do have very little to do with sex. And on average they have very little sex. And it’s mostly with strangers they never want to see again.
Many suffer from things like borderline (a difficulty in forming and maintaining relationships).
I remember meeting a young gay friend of a friend in London and when I asked him about sex – he said he never ever has sex – he hates it!. He declares as gay because he likes to dye his hair etc and wear Prada bags etc
It remind me of another parallel with Jews – most of them are not really jews at all (most of the ones I have met in LA – jews I mean look like Eastern Europeans such as myself). I have read somewhere they have very little to do with biblical jews.
Another thing discipline and uniformity is enforced – kind of like what I read in the book Jewish History – Jewish Religion – the weight of 2000 years ) – Rabbies had a power to excommunicate other jews. It’s similar with gays – if you move too far from their enforced norms – they don’t want to hang out with you – and they talk about it – like they enjoy punishing disobedient cult members (that they are in many ways)
It’s a very interesting pathology and very similar to zionism (a parallel they love to hear)
Tomo, thanks for the comment.
These symptoms cross gender-identity boundaries, don’t you think?
Toronnow eh? Ever at the Jet Fuel?
Totally true, btw; even for Canada, the sheeple principle, wow!
I’ve seen this first directly second hand, after getting involved with a ‘lesbian‘, who was a very strong personality, but wanted to keep our relationship on the QT, lest she be shunned; now out of the closet, bi-
But the queers (no derogatory intent), they seem to be a little bit more, ‘anything-goes’, less judgemental, just … getting their freak on, any way, any how, any time?!
But, I’m not in the ‘community‘, (as much as anyone can not be in the community in Toronto, if you live there.)
You might be interested in following with ‘Sex and Character’ by Otto Weininger, which is quite appropo with this article.
Thank you for presenting this very informative video. I gather from the video that it didn’t take too many decades from the original plan to reach the stage where criticising homosexuals in the Western media is a “passport” for ruining your career. Just like the Zionists, they seem to have uber protected status in the perverted Western societies. Also, just like the Zionists, they appear to have used identical methods (but in a considerably shorter period of time) to reach this status. I often ask myself this question; whose agenda is it for this particular group of people with sexual deviations to be empowered in this way and why?
they mostly are jews – at least the ones I have met in California
As soon as human beings become partial, or biased toward anything, they have begun to veer away from the detached viewpoint that is necessary for a spiritually balanced existence. It’s not in how we define ourselves culturally, racially, socio-economically, sexually etc. that true freedom lies ( although those factors do need to be addressed, as they can and are very often the cause of misery in the lives of so many ), true freedom can only be found in a spiritual sense, ie, within the depths of one’s own being.
There seems to be a pattern, that as soon as one formerly downtrodden individual/group/nation etc. gains first a foothold, then grows in power and influence, that they then become the effect of the power that they were seeking ( in order to better their situation ). Sexuality isn’t the problem, it’s the power that promotes whatever the ’cause’ is, as they inevitably end up becoming the usurper, powermonger, etc. that they were formerly fighting against.
I can’t help but wonder why the U.S. Government after having convicted Bradley Manning suddenly granted him a change of sex while incarcerated. After all he was put in jail to be punished, and not to have his fantasies fulfilled (if he ever really had such fantasies), and at cost to the American taxpayer at that. I postulate his sex change operation while in jail, may not really have been at his option, but rather was forced upon him as a form of punishment. As sadistic as the procedure may have been, and probably was, the liberal press cheered it on all the while. I’m hoping someone one day will look into and report what really went on, but one cannot count on the liberal U.S. press to do that.
I have a question.
Human rights are a thing. They are a reasonable means of promoting minimum acceptable public, political ethics across nations and cultures – a basic minimum that can generally be agreed on. Human rights have been taken over by the West in the last fifty years as a means to attack its opponents. Human rights and “human rights” are two distinct things. One reasonable. The other hypocrisy in the service of self-interest.
Is there not a similar distinction to be made in relation to gay rights? (I leave to one side the “woke” world of transgender I don’t know what, which seems to take what is a genuine issue for something like 0.1% or less of any population, and turn it into the latest and most surreal test of correctness). Is there not a reasonable argument for gay rights. And a hypocritical campaign (which now includes trans whatever) to promote the West as in the vanguard of civilisation (!) – a campaign which will backfire horribly?
I ask this tentatively because earlier efforts to understand “conservative” and “traditional” ripostes (or whatever term is accepted as not tendentious) to (what I would argue are travesties of) “progressive” positions have been taken as stupid or insulting – which is not the intention.
There will be no “conservative” or “traditional” “ripostes”.
The outcome of societies will be much more effective at showing the truth about this (and many other) social phenomena.
As for debunking the fallacies of the Homo Lobby – I will write an article about that in the not too distant future.
It is an interesting phenomenon – and like most other western (especially American ) things – it’s not at all what it seems.
I spent 13 or so years in the UK and as many in LA, SF, DC etc and now here in Canada. I have met hundreds of self-proclaimed gay men and women, trannies…etc while living there.
The biggest surprise to me as a Serb was to see that what these people are and do has nothing really to do with sex. The best description I can come up with is a cult really. Religious cult with a very strong jewish influence (after all most of the gays I have met there are jews – and more than anything to do with sexual attraction towards the same sex – they are infused with fear/hatred of their manipulative, cold and very controlling totalitarian mothers.
So this link goes a long way of why this ‘movement’ (like trying to hoard cats) is very much organized like a zionist camp. They are mostly jews, and are above all interested in control and power as zionazis are. the 2 categories often overlap.
I was told by a gay/tranny friend who works for both the White House and Pentagon that most of the US State Department is made of gays – he even found it perplexing. He told me they even have their FB page. So much for controlling, strange manipulative policies that come from there.
I think ruling classes find these people to be a very helpful and passionate useful idiots – they are above all very easy to control, since they are naturally very insecure and depressed/manic fragment of the already depressed and manic US population. They are so easy to make love monstrocities like Hilary (I was shocked to see that gay Americans I know were the most rabid Hitlary-supporters of all.
Another interesting thing abut these gays I’ve met (ranging from the most senior people in HBO, executive producers of shows like Sex and the City etc), best friends of most famous Hollywood actors ect..most senior US politicians, judges and their kids, some of the best and most famous US architects etc) – is that they don’t really get on well with each others and their ‘friendships’ are very shallow, fake, competitive and ugly in many ways.
It’s very predatory scenario they live in – using and abusing each other is the norm
When they have sex with anyone it’s very likely with complete strangers they have met in dark bars where they have sex in the back alley, and they never ever want to see each other again. This was done while drunk and under the influence of drugs . There is very little or no solidarity there and very little or none at all – love. That was my biggest surprise.
I’ve been to birthday parties to some of the most powerful producers in Hollywood – and there was 50 or so gay men and maybe one fat lesbian and no normal women at all – that tells you how unbalanced and strange these people are. And they don’t help each other – it’s a myth that there is a gay mafia helping each other – they are like a mafia but they compete with each other – they don’t help. Very insecure people bullied when young, raped by priests often or uncles (I’ve done some research with then several times I asked them about their history etc).
I have heard about many cases when boyfriends infect their boyfriends with HIV (they don’t tell them they have it – so they have unprotected sex). Then the other BF finds the HIV meds etc – so much for their solidarity.
Most of them are on Prozac etc, many are Borderline etc – I have always thought it’s a club of peopel who have been bullied and are very insecure = it’s been cultivated like a label for such people – nothing to do with sex.
Do you feel shy/insecure/inadequate/isolated and lost in many ways? Yes? then just say you are gay – and that’s why you are that way. You are a victim (gay people are just like JEws – I have herd them say it so many times). In reality the cause/effect is the reverse – but this is has become a socially acceptable label to identify yourself like a victim who can do no wrong (sound familiar?).
while I lived there I was persuaded to write a book about my LA experience by a famous producer friend and neighbor. Joel Grey the actor loved it as did Harrison Ford’s son and many others – even that richest man in the UK Metal or whatever his name is – a business partner of a gay friend of mine who gave him the book to read) read it. Here is a link if you are interested – I think it’s cheap on kindle (and you can return it for a refund if you read it within a week – as I do with many books) I didn’t write it to make money – just to share my experience
It deals exactly with this subject you mention – and when I wrote it HBO HQ called me to tell me not to publish it – but I did anyway:
“And they don’t help each other – it’s a myth that there is a gay mafia helping each other – they are like a mafia but they compete with each other – they don’t help.“
thanks for the comment. i was about to make the same comment about there being little or no solidarity among gays. i don’t think The Saker’s comparison with the ziolobbies makes sense (and i don’t remember having read such a statement on Soral’s site either)
my former gay neighbor from LA (he produced 2 movies which made more money than any other movies ever made before – this was about a decade ago) – is always so proud to say that all his friends are poor.
To which I replied – of course they are poor because you never want to help any of them.
Insecure people in Hollywood (esp the wealthy but geeky/lonely/insecure and/or gay ones I have met) never really want to help anyone. They tend to hang out with each other so to compare themselves (because they are so insecure) — but genuine friendliness and friendships are very rare.
‘Best friends’ are very jealous of each other – and they even say it openly
One of my best friends there (a famous designer and a mother in law of probably the most famous guitar player in the world) got very jealous when I was offered to have an exhibition of sculptures I made while living in LA (even though I often helped her with designing stuff – and I generally treat them like my family – although they are jewish). She almost shouted at me angrily: “most people wait their whole lives to be able to have such exhibition – and you just get it like that!” I could not believe my Serbian eyes.
Toronto Police are barred from arresting LGBTQ participants if they walk nude in public. This also applies if they do this in their workplaces, especially stripping nude in classrooms for students.
not surprising – I live in Toronto – people seem very fearful and obedient – I have never seen anything like that. Everybody I know is scared to comment about anything – they fear them may lose their jobs etc
Homosexuality may be defined (somewhat clumsily, and tentatively) as ‘socially reproductive disability’. That is to say, homosexuals are disabled in that they cannot reproduce according to world-wide practiced societal norms.
They are as fertile as normal people, and can make babies, although only by stepping outside of homosexuality. Their unions cannot produce children the way normal people’s unions do.
A normal adult asked to imagine being a baby up for adoption, and given the choice of a normal family or a homosexual couple, would always choose normal. Allowing homosexual adoptions is a far-fetched privilege granted to unqualified people unfairly.
Other disabled people, like the blind and the deaf, are not granted privileges for which they lack qualifications because of their disability.
There are negative consequences to granting privileges to unqualified people.
There’s is very little that could shake me from defending the Russian state and the great people of Russia in these times of Russophobia. My support has been unequivocal well before the Western Capitalist interests took aim at Russia. Even though I fall within the lgbt family of people I have still respected the cultural difference in regard to gender and sexuality. I’m the same way I may not agree with the approach taken by some other nations in their appliance of rights in general I accept we live in societies that hold widely different views. hideous
That said these videos you posted are hideous, skin to something like “The Protocols of Zion” being inflammatory and containing a barely concealed call to arms against people who may differ in sexuality and gender.Mr Saker you have achieved what I thought impossible in that if these views are prevalent in the mass of the Russian public I would fear for not only for my life should should I ever venture to Russia more importantly i fear for the lives of other lgbt people in Russia. I henceforth will take a highly sceptical view of Russian politics
Sometimes the blinkers are removed from a useful idiot and sadly I put myself in that category after reading your comments and watching these videos.
There is no program or collusion with the moneyed class, I myself an a working class Socialist and no one ever instructed me about my gender. I’m as old as some of those gentle old Gay people who had to work out my place in life in my own. Your videos are cruel representation of lgbt people and our often marginal place in Western societies.
The calibre of your choice of source information has enlightened me to gross deficit in your intelligence and an underlying nasty attitude to people c current to you.
A very important and much overlooked factor are the really great troubles in the relationships between the men and the women throughout most cultures and throughout most history. If relations between men and women were not so permeated with hostilities, then much of the homosexual and lesbian practices would tend to vanish.
I think it is documentable for instance that the dominant method of enforcing sexual conduct is by the emotions of anger, fear, disgust and shame, and that the dominant moralities view sexual contact and behavior as decadent, disgusting and obscene—first and foremost as between men and women! In such an atmosphere, it should be little wonder that many people might simply not stand the hostile overall atmosphere between the men and women and therefore run away to the same-sex alternative.—Also, I think there is another more sinister strategy being employed: based on the very correct idea that if a critical proportion of women become so terrified of all adult sexually capable men and so furious at such men that they will no longer want any relations with men,—then the whole heterosexual “straight” system would be destroyed.
And then let the chips fall where they may. Everyone would have only two choices: same sex relations, or an ascetical lifestyle with no relations involving any sexual contact. Thus, we see a barrage of horror stories and other efforts to portray men as predators and perverts, dangerous and disgusting. And the focus now is overall that women’s sexuality is attractive, safe and nice, whereas men’s sexuality, be it straight or not, is altogether very disgusting, very dangerous and very hateful,—like dead rats or creeping snakes. In the so-called West, women are becoming more and more scared and angry at men and really want nothing to so with men if possible.—In societies so-called Islamic, any form of trust, attraction and love (especially sexual) as between men and women seems to be the chief focus of disgrace, dishonor and punishment. Movements like the Taliban, the Iranian brand of Islam, the even more “unmasked” versions of various “takfiris” seem to be at least 50% if not more obsessed and based on men feeling very much “harassed” by even any presence of women in their midst.—And thus with all these troubles between men and women in general, it is not much wonder that strange alternatives start flourishing. By the way, reminded, stories about man-boy relations among the otherwise so morally and spiritually superior Taliban……
“stories about man-boy relations among the otherwise so morally and spiritually superior Taliban……”
Oh, yes, it’s called “bachebaze.” It is common throughout Afghanistan, not just among the Taliban. Powerful local men can force other men to give up their sons for this—or, the family needs the money and basically sells the boy into sexual exploitation and humiliation.
I have seen a couple of documentaries about this sexual slavery of boys. Here is a BBC report.
Who cares what the women think or feel, either for themselves and their pride, or for their sons? No one, as far as I can tell. And this is by no means limited to Afghanistan. It is really no wonder that many women shrug when it comes to the caro sposo.
As far as I can make out, there is an older male/younger male sexual subculture of some kind in every culture. Of course, older male/younger female, too.
Power has always been a big part of the sexual and also marital mix. The ideal of a “family unit” anchored by a man and woman who married for love is a pretty recent idea. Even those “family units” are regularly wrecked.
Furthermore, some of the most tortured relationships are those between siblings in these domestic hot houses. Unhappy the third or fourth daughter in a family that wants a boy and values boys over girls. Happy the child who at least has some uncles, aunts, cousins, and grandparents with whom to form healthy, happy relationships. In light of all this, it is a wonder that anyone has a “healthy” sex and emotional life at all!! And, even among these paragons, it seems there are a lot of bisexual men and women. Surveys have also shown that many of the “paragons” have same-sex sexual fantasies to help themselves along.
Personally I find the whole bachabaze thing awful. Any type of sexual exploitation is degrading. But let’s not hide behind rose-colored glasses of “normalcy” and what a self-selected group of arbiters considers acceptable sexual behavior. A lot of “normalcy” is a facade. In particular I “shrug” at the spectacle of such a self-appointed group that belongs to or hews to traditionally patriarchal organizations or hierarchies.
There is also a older female/younger male subculture in which power and money is involved. Maybe you heard the term ‘gigolo’.
Your point is?
I assume you are agreeing with me, that power relations have a lot to do with sex, love, marriage, whoring.
The “norm” in terms of power relations is for an older male to have more money than a young female.
Or even for any male to have more money than most any female, even near his own age.
No one is upset by this constellation.
If the older female is the one with the dough and hence is “wearing the pants,” red alert!!!
Or, if the same-age female is the one with more money, that is also a source of discomfort.
OK for mom to stay home with the kids; not for dad.
I am not expressing an opinion or a value judgment.
The point would be that the feminist demand for free-sex as a fight against the norms imposed by ‘patriarchy’ is not far from the demand to have bashabaze. It is what the ‘traditionals’ called fornication, πορνεία, whoredom, sexual immorality. The ‘revolutionary’ precedence of self gratification over necessary restraints which make social life bearable.
“The point would be that the feminist demand for free-sex as a fight against the norms imposed by ‘patriarchy’ is not far from the demand to have bashabaze.”
Huh? What is “free-sex”?
What does a woman’s demand for the right to enjoy sex have to do with bachabase?
Obviously, not all desires can be guaranteed of fulfilment.
Unless one has power over another.
This response makes absolutely no sense to me.
overall i agree with the first of the two videos, describing the master plan for conquering the hearts and minds of the population for the gay cause, but i don’t see the point for the second video, which seems to aim at reclassifying homosexuality as a mental disorder or some such disease.
being a gay myself, i am definitely annoyed by the LGBT propaganda and i don’t think gay marriage or adoption is a good idea, however, i do not think of myself as having a mental disorder. i am also annoyed when people equate homosexuality with anal penetration. many homos that i know, including myself, have never ever practiced it
agricultural chemicals are mainly responsible for the increase in sexual confusion.
Hormones are used in all present day vegetable breeding and in cereal crop breeding and production. They are also widely used in animal husbandry. Sexual differentiation operations are sky rocketing. Girls get their menses at the age of 10 often at the age of 8. male sterility is blooming, sperm counts are collapsing.
It is rather simple. The majority of the 1% that comprise the Anglo-American elites are closet satanists. Why else are they working so hard to eradicate Christianity from the world. They are wealthy enough, so if money is not the issue, then the desire to remake the world must have a spiritual purpose.
“So what we really have is not simply a regression to magical thinking, but a merging of the primitive impulse with the modern totalitarian state. The mumbo-jumbo ideology of transgenderism can only survive if it is backed by state power. But the new primitives don’t know enough history to realize that they live in an increasingly unfree society.”
Thank you. Originally I found your use of the term Anglo-Zionist off putting, but in the end it helped me to better understand the geopolitical game playing. Now your use of Homo Lobby is hard to digest, but likely informative. It was actually very interesting to find out what kind of propaganda is being used in Russia to counteract the propaganda being used throughout the West. I have to say, the strategies and techniques used by gay activists look light years ahead of these transparently staged newsroom and schoolroom reports. It was a good idea to have a woman deliver the speeches so the typical defense strategy of claiming that any non-supportive men are actually closet homosexuals would not get triggered as consistently in viewers minds. Why male homosexuality is so much more of a social threat than female homosexuality really should be studied. I found the choice to have a man read the quotes in the second episode made it less convincing, though that may not have the same effect in Russia. Authoritarian male voices always remind me of 1950’s propaganda like Reefer Madness and make me more rather than less resistant.
Despite being gay myself, I have always felt queasy about the one-world-order imposition of gay rights everywhere. Sure, I would love to feel safe traveling anywhere in the world, but I think each state has the right to make its own choices whether I agree with them or not. Russia had a declining population from the 1990’s into the naughts. If it sees greater political stability coming from discouraging homosexuality, promoting family units, and encouraging distinct gender roles to produce a generation of fearless men willing to die for their country, it has every right to promote those policies. The United States has chosen a different set of political expedients which appears to have led to a bloated, lazy, entitled, coddled military. Eventually, when outright conflict finally comes, we will discover which nation made the better choice for the long-term integrity of the country.
These videos prefer to take the easy way out by demonizing the extraordinarily effective gay rights campaign. I was surprised they didn’t play sinister music each time she highlighted biased techniques and strategies that were implemented. Harvesting low hanging fruit guarantees a harvest, but only a small one — is that all they’re hoping for? Like the Republicans of old and the Democrats today, are the programmers only hoping to get morality points for being a small minority defending the “right” position, which is so self-obvious to them that they won’t even bother with convincing anyone else? The gay agenda is no more inevitable than any other policy platform. All sorts of techniques were used to promote it, both morally justifiable and immoral. But that is true of any successful agenda. The question is not one of moral purity over bias, but of sacrifice over laziness. Are you willing to be exceptionally uncomfortable for a prolonged period of time, or do you just reach for low-hanging fruit?
Gay activists were willing to set aside all sorts of creature comforts in order to fight. During the AIDS crisis they felt they were fighting for their lives, just as the 1960’s protesters felt they were fighting for their lives under the threat of Vietnam. The black rights movement used all the techniques described in these videos, including getting black characters in the media, focusing on palatable similarities between black and white culture rather than promoting the differences in an in-yo’-face style, and having riots and sit-ins to alter the costs to the status quo. The Suffragette movement used similar techniques and disruptions. All were willing to give up whatever benefits silence had afforded them to demand different benefits more to their liking.
Does that make any of those movements right or inevitable? Of course not, just doggedly tenacious. Women’s rights will surely finish its ultimate trajectory in clearly established division of labor based on gender roles that increase survival chances during an unstable dark age. Gay rights will surely fare no better than disabled and elder rights in the long run. However, if the programmers want to effectively counteract gay rights in the short term, they need to highlight the weaknesses it imposes on society at large, not attempt to tar it with the broad brush of the very techniques that every rights movement utilizes. Today even white nationalists are attempting to get positive images of themselves embedded in the media and to downplay their more extremist members. Stopping a “rights” movement in the West has been difficult given that the whole progress-oriented Western world view glorifies increased inclusivity and denigrates sane borders and limits. Although that world view is past its pull date, the pendulum has not yet swung the other way, so resisting a “rights” movement takes dedication and effort. These videos look pretty ameteurish to me given their apparent goal. But perhaps their real goal is for the already converted to be able to pat each other on the back.
Thanks for this thoughtful response.
Re “and encouraging distinct gender roles to produce a generation of fearless men willing to die for their country,”
are you saying that this is the only way to produce warriors willing to fight, with the know-how to do so?
I would have to disagree with that.
I believe there is plenty of evidence that willingness and ability to fight is not confined to heterosexual males.
Judging from common homosexual imagery, there are plenty of big strong tough scary-looking homosexual men out there whom I wouldn’t want to encounter on a battle field!
Indeed there are many heteros who are not natural warriors who would rather manage a barbecue than a battlefield. Or a dark street.
Don’t care for homosexuality and my main concern is that they mind their own business, stop being so much in-our-face about it – a little more class please. The gay marches in Amsterdam are lewd and crude and stupid and prove just because one is gay doesn’t mean you are automatically a good person – but that seems to be the message. One of my favorite writers was Gore Vidal, who interestingly once wrote, “There is no such thing as a homosexual, only homosexual acts.”
After listening to E. Michael Jones, the whole PRIDE thing takes on a new meaning.
Standing in direct defiance of God.
I have never deliberately attended a PRIDE parade.
I never will.
First: i never read those clever usonian campaigners even though i have taken some part in the gay movement in Sweden since the late mid-seventies. I think that they must have read E. Bernays and applied regular propaganda practises. Check on Bernays if anything in the campaign disturbs you, and compare with the climate scare.
What is really interesting in the first video is the mention of the Malthusian agenda. I never thought of it.
After all the Malthusian rulers have launched all kinds of schemes to reduce the population, so why not this one.
I never thought about it because being French i grew up in a society which tried to force us to procreate, in order to compensate for the bloodshed of WWI (just like the Soviet Union after WWII, and Russia after Chernobyl and the collapse of the CCCP ). A parlamentarian called Michel Debré later wanted a 100 million inhabitant France in order to be able to secure an empire. No Malthusians, there and then!
Sexual education was forbidden in France until the late seventies and i was utterly ignorant about much everything sexual.
I was probably the last one to realize i was gay, and that happened when i got horny as hell beside a friend who was not even gay, while i was madly in love with a great (also in bed) girl that i considered marrying. What a chock!
Don’t tell me about external inducement there.
Anyhow, i hope that the Saker is going to follow up the Malthusian trail’s different projects because it is very interesting.
Second: i am appalled by the amount of ignorant bigot crap in the comments to those videos.
I cannot help thinking about the moral-majority politicians who get caught in Paris with their pants down together with some underage prostitute.
Not to mention the Victorians crossing the Channel to shag in Paris “in the good old days”, when the English clad furniture legs “for decency”. It was probably (European) History’s worse period of hypocritical sexual obsession, and perversion as well.
One thing i can tell you is alltougth i am 73 years old all kinds of youngsters and oldies ask for my cock when i go swimming.
Most of them are married or at least paired (usually with a woman) and therefore live in the closet.
Yes, Sweden is still a huge closet, in spite of apparent legislation and official attitudes.
Yes, more than some are romantic even though it may take years before one dares tell you “i love you”. But, as you all know, most young men are scared by the love they long for. That’s why there has always been so many stupid fights and wars.
I would love to find a new mate (15 monogamous years together with the previous) but one cannot get paired with somebody who clings to living in the closet. (The old ones dare not tell their grand-children and the young, specially Asians, often tell me “my father would kill me if he knew”.)
So, i do have fuck-buddies so far, as celibacy is stupid besides leading to bad health, alcoholism or drug abuse.
Casual sex is far better than paying fees to a psychiatrist who is going to turn you dumb and broke, and it is almost completely free (condoms and glide do cost, but not remotely as much as doctors and anti-depressive medication).
The mystery, to me, is why so many bother about what others do or do not, when not tasked to do so. A cop has to check on terrorists and murderers but your neighbour has no need to know what happens in your home unless he smells a fire breaking out.
Why not just live and let live?
No one ever seems to wish to point out that the rate of suicide among male and female gays is far greater than for the non-gays.
“One study that linked Danish mortality and sociodemographic data (Qin, Agerbo, & Mortensen, 2003) noted that same-sex registered domestic partners were 3–4 times more likely than heterosexual married persons to die by suicide”
It is a nihilistic cult of death.
Thank you for speaking the “truth to power” about this topic. It is crucial to always speak the truth about homosexuality, its disordered nature, its destructive effects, including spiritually. Bravo.
This is the how, but where’s the why!
Unlike most everyone else here, I think this nonsense has morphed into a powerful PROPAGANDA tool seen in the US & Europe.
The same kind of PR in the US is now between Blacks-Minorities vs Whites or being Republican vs Democrats. All these relations have grown worse with this PR blitz seen in all the media.
But the REAL purpose of this PR deluge is to divide/disunify the American public. What America needs most right now is to be unified in looking at the Bohemoth Financial World that’s literally killing, maiming and further impoverishing millions of us. So let these masterminds continue their systematic destruction of the society to enable the Super Wealthy continue their egregious greed for $$$ and prestige, and to hell with all of us peons.
appears an accurate description of whats going on.
in addition we have ‘immigrant flow’ into the west which appear to contain the worst elements of the people from where the flows originate..people often trained by the west to kill their own people and destabilize their own societies..or other developing world nations.
when these ‘immigrants’ commit horrific crimes in Europe and America..or do anything that can be represented in the western media as horrific crime..rapes and gruesome rapes and murders for eg..it gives real meat and gristle to the disunity propaganda
the homosexual revolution is disunity and destabilization with capital D’s..as well as a major depopulation sub set..another big D
my impression is that if 5% was a constant it no longer is..that there is increase in homosexual activity in the western population if not the globally. where I grew up there was always contempt and jokes about homosexuality. we called homosexual men ‘Bullers’ from the action of Bull cows ramming ho. but if my memory does not fail me I do remember incidents I was witness to activities that exposed that the older guys were amenable to such sexuality… for a price for sure if not regularly so
it was/still is a very christian country..which means a vastly hypocrite and violent country. as I grew I never noticed any morality at all that the people took so seriously as to actually abide by them.
now that homosexuality is legal and actually encouraged there must be an explosion of it there right now. I read of the passage of legislation making homosexuality legal in that country. I should get about finding out how legality has impacted the local sexuality.
were I a betting man I would wager on explosion