A few more links here, and amongst the many similar to yesterday’s, I decided to single out some possibly different ones:
Of course, this selection is very one-sided, there are many more headlines every bit as bad the ones yesterday, so let’s not make too much of this.
Also, please remember that in 08.08.08 Saakashvili made a speech promising peace to South Ossetia just HOURS before the Georgian forces attacked!
But what this does show, is that there is a “narrative chaos“.
Actually, this is just the tip of a much bigger iceberg. The fact is that Russia’s ultimatum has created chaos in the so-called “united West” pitting some part of the deep state elites against others. That, by itself, is already a very good outcome.
Another good outcome is the laughable idea to send a few thousands US troops to “defend Europe” within five days. Why is is laughable:
- a few thousand troops make no difference
- bringing them to the EU is not enough, you then have to prepare them and deploy them for combat; that would take much longer.
- If a Ukie attack is limited to the LDNR, it will take about 24 hours to stop it. It would take Russia less than a week to destroy the Ukie military. By the time the first US jarheads land in Germany or Poland, it will all be over.
- Finally, what does adding several thousands solider from a military which has never fought in defense of its homeland and never won a war since WWII do to “deter Russia” anyway?
Next, I strictly personal opinion about Russian forces in Cuba/Nicarague/Venezuela/etc.
As Andrei Martyanov recently commented, western military moves are all about PR. Russian military moves are all about war. From a PR prospective, deploying Russian missiles in Cuba or Venezuela might look like a good idea, but from a military point of view?
Does anybody remember that the USSR had several brigades defending the Soviet missiles in Cuba? Why, because Cuba is as close to the USA as Estonia is to Russia, and that means that deploying forces right across the US border puts that force at a huge risk of US preemptive attack.
Next, while Cuba is the most stable of them all, it is a fact that thanks to decades of subversion, attacks, sabotage, coup attempts and the like, countries like Nicaragua or Venezuela are inherently unstable (again, by no fault of their own). Placing weapons like, say, the Iskander complexes there would not only expose them to attack, but even possibly to capture. Some will say that Russia can send forces there to defend them. In theory – yes. But in practice?
Such a deployment would be both risky and very very expensive. Also, what if the US decides not to invade Cuba/Venezuela/Nicaragua but to blockade it. Does the Russian military have the means to breach a blockade many thousands of miles away from Russia? Nope, she does not. Neither her Navy nor her Aerospace forces have the means to engage in a struggle for naval/air superiority against the USA in the Caribbean.
It would be much safer, quicker and cheaper to use her submarines and long range aviation to threaten both US coasts, the one in the Atlantic and the one in the Pacific with cruise and ballistic missiles, including hypersonic ones. I won’t even mention the Poseidon underwater drones which could completely wipe out both US coasts.
Interestingly, the RAND corporation is posting articles which strongly suggest that the US and the West are deluding themselves about how war between Banderastan and Russia would look. Check these out:
Okay, RAND is RAND, so they will never challenge the official narrative about Russia as the evil aggressor, but this shows, yet again, that there is some very serious disagreements inside the US ruling elites.
I will conclude today with 4 photos under the heading “one image is worth 1000 words”:
This is the Russian minister of defense:
These are Russian soliders
This is the Ukie minister of defense:
This is, according the The Times, the
soldiers civilians which will deter/defeat the Russians
Reach your own conclusions :-)
PS: if you understand Russian, here is some good info on the woman created above.