By Cynthia Chung for the Saker Blog
Today we see the continuation of the over seven decade’s long ruse, the targeting of individuals as Russian agents without any basis, in order to remove them from the political arena. The present effort to declassify the Russiagate papers and exonerate Michael Flynn, so that he may freely speak of the intelligence he knows, is not a threat to national security, it is a threat to those who have committed treason against their country.
On Oct. 6th, 2020, President Trump ordered the declassification of the Russia Probe documents along with the classified documents on the findings concerning the Hillary Clinton emails. The release of these documents threatens to expose the entrapment of the Trump campaign by the Clinton campaign with help of the US intelligence agencies.
The Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe released some of these documents recently, including former CIA Director John Brennan’s handwritten notes for a meeting with former President Obama, the notes revealing that Hillary Clinton approved a plan to “vilify Donald Trump by stirring up scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service.”
Trey Gowdy, who was Chair of the House Oversight Committee from June 13th, 2017 – Jan. 3rd, 2019, has stated in an interview on Oct. 7th, 2020 that he has never seen these documents. Devin Nunes, who was Chair of the House Intelligence Committee from Jan. 3rd, 2015 – Jan. 3rd, 2019, has also said in a recent interview that he has never seen these documents.
And yet, both the FBI and CIA were aware and had access to these documents and sat on them for four years, withholding their release from several government-led investigations that were looking into the Russiagate scandal and who were requesting relevant material that was in the possession of both intelligence bureaus.
Do these intelligence bureaus sound like they are working for the “national security” of the American people?
The CIA’s Long Battle against “Soviet propaganda”
In order to combat the “threat” of Soviet “propaganda” entering the U.S. and seducing Americans, Operation Mockingbird was created as a form of “control” over information dissemination during the period of McCarthyism. Operation Mockingbird was an “alleged” CIA program that was started in the early 1950s in order to control the narrative of the news. Though this role has never been confirmed entirely, in the CIA Family Jewels report compiled in the mid-1970s, it is confirmed that Project Mockingbird did exist as a CIA operation and that it was guilty of wire-tapping journalists in Washington.
At the helm of this project was none other than CIA Director Allen Dulles, an enemy of JFK, who by the early 1950s “allegedly” oversaw the media network and had major influence over 25 newspapers and wire agencies. Its function was to have the CIA write reports that would be used by a network of cooperating “credible” reporters. By these “credible” reporters spreading the CIA dictated narrative, it would be parroted by unwitting reporters (mockingbirds) and a successful echo chamber would be created across the world.
The Office of Policy Coordination (OPC), originally named Office of Special Projects but that was thought too conspicuous, was a covert operation wing of the CIA and was created by the United States National Security Council (NSC). For those who are unfamiliar with the origins of the NSC and its close relationship with the CIA, who was born on the same day, refer to my paper on the subject.
According to Deborah Davis’ biography of Katherine Graham (the owner of Washington Post), the OPC created Operation Mockingbird in response to addressing Soviet propaganda and included as part of its CIA contingency respected members from Washington Post, The New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and others.
The Family Jewels report was an investigation made by the CIA to investigate…the CIA, spurred in response to the Watergate Scandal and the CIA’s unconstitutional role in the whole affair. The investigation of the CIA would include any other actions that were deemed illegal or inappropriate spanning from the 1950s-mid 1970s.
We are told “most” of the report was declassified on June 25, 2007 (30 years later) hoping that people would have lost interest in the whole brouhaha. Along with the release of the redacted report was included a six-page summary with the following introduction:
“The Central Intelligence Agency violated its charter for 25 years until revelations of illegal wiretapping, domestic surveillance, assassination plots, and human experimentation led to official investigations and reforms in the 1970s.” [emphasis added]
The most extensive investigation of the CIA relations with news media was conducted by the Church Committee, a U.S. Senate select committee in 1975 that investigated the abuses committed by the CIA, NSA, FBI, and IRS. The Church Committee report confirmed abundant CIA ties in both foreign and domestic news media.
It is very useful that there exists an official recognition that false news was not only being encouraged by the CIA under the overseeing of the NSC during the Cold War period, but that the CIA was complicit in actually detailing the specific narrative that they wanted disseminated, and often going so far as to write the narrative and have a “credible” reporter’s name stamped on it.
But the question begs, “Did the Cold War ever end?” and if not, why should we believe that the CIA’s involvement in such activities is buried in its past and that it has “reformed” its old ways?
Henry Kissinger’s Purge of American Intelligence: The Deep State is Born
For us to get a better understanding of how we ended up in this situation, that is so stark that Devin Nunes, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, has recently stated that the intelligence bureaus may need to be overhauled due to withholding evidence from federal inquiries, we need to go back a few decades and review how Henry Kissinger largely set this whole affair into motion.
From the moment Kissinger assumed the post of National Security Advisor to Nixon, he set out to centralize all intelligence estimates, diplomatic initiatives, and covert operations over figuratively and sometimes literal dead bodies of members of the CIA, Joint Chiefs of Staff, State Department and Congress.
According to John Ranelagh in his book The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA:
“Very early in the Nixon administration, it became clear that the President wanted Henry Kissinger to run intelligence for him and that the NSC staff in the White House under Kissinger would control the intelligence community. This was the beginning of a shift of power away from the CIA to a new center: the growing NSC staff.”
Kissinger would use the Watergate scandal, where the CIA was caught by Congress directly implicated in treasonous activities, as the impetus needed to form a new CIA, a secret branch away from the scrutiny of Congress.
In 1978, Kissinger would launch the Intelligence Reorganization and Reform Act, which essentially worked to “clean house” of the intelligence community.
In 1982, under the direction of Kissinger, President Reagan would sign NSDD 77 under Cold War duress, which would launch Project Democracy, a sardonic name for a Trojan Horse.
NSDD 77 allowed Project Democracy the reins over “covert action on a broad scale” as well as overt public actions later to be associated with the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The directive ordered the CIA to stay out of both the overt and covert part of Project Democracy, thus giving free reign to the Kissingerian “NSC apparatus”.
Almost one year later, the uninformed and naïve Congress passed the NED Act in Oct 1983, and effectively signed off on wrapping duct tape around their heads.
The structure of the NED essentially functions as a private CIA political operations arm of an invisible, secret government beyond accountability and beyond the reach of the law.
Kissinger’s purge of American intelligence would be the last purge of sane patriotic leadership within the intelligence community, left to the hyenas and jackals to run from thenceforth, those who still had a degree of humanity as members of the intelligence community, and had survived the Kissinger purge, were simply kept in the dark about the cloak and dagger operations of the secret government branch.
In a 1991 interview, then NED President David Ignatius arrogantly stated “a lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA…The biggest difference is that when such activities are done overtly, the flap potential is close to zero. Openness is its own protection”.
The failure of the nation state is not a natural phenomenon but rather is the outcome of a fascist coup; involving a banker’s dictatorship, economic looting and permanent warfare (the Cold War never ended) to hinder national industrial growth.
Among the most effective strategies towards this end has been color revolutions, which just so happens to be the NED’s specialty practice and has included, to name a few, the nations of Yugoslavia, Belarus, Georgia, Iraq, Lebanon, Burma, Iran, Egypt, Thailand, Ukraine and the Hong Kong protests.
Wherever this strategy has unfolded, the target state is told by the international community that it has no right to intervene and is told to stand by as its nation is ransacked by locusts and its government ‘reorganised’.
Secret Intelligence’s Countering of “Anti-American” Propaganda
The Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act is a bipartisan bill that was passed into law in December 2016, it was initially called Countering Information Warfare Act. It was included together with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This bill was brought into effect just weeks before Trump was to enter office….hmmm, foreshadowing much?
Soon after the 2016 U.S. election, the Washington Post led the charge asserting that it was due to Russian propaganda that the U.S. elections turned out the way it did, that is, that Hillary had somehow, inconceivably, lost to Donald Trump and that the American people had been turned against her like a child caught in the middle of a messy divorce case. But there is no need here to set the record straight on Hillary, when Hillary herself has done suffice damage to any illusion of credibility she once had. That ultimately not even Hillary could hide the fact that her closet full of skeletons turned out to be the size of a catacomb.
But we are told that citizens do not know what is best for one’s self. That they cannot be trusted with “sensitive” information and in accordance act in a “responsible” manner, that is, to have a strong enough stomach to do what is “best” for their country.
And therefore, fear not subjects of the land, for the Global Engagement Center (GEC) is here to make those hard decisions for you. Don’t know what to think about a complicated subject? GEC will tell you the right way!
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would allow for the Secretary of State to collaborate with the Secretary of Defense, and other Federal agencies in the year 2017 to create the Global Engagement Center (GEC). The GEC’s purpose in life is to fight propaganda from foreign governments and publicize the nature of ongoing foreign propaganda and disinformation operations against the U.S. and other countries.
Let us all take a moment to thank the GEC for such a massive task in the cause for justice all around the world.
The GEC had a very slow start in its first year, however, it has been gaining momentum in the last year under Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who seems especially excited over the hiring of Lea Gabrielle as special envoy and coordinator of GEC.
Mike Pompeo was the CIA Director from 2017-2018. On April 15, 2019, Pompeo participated in a discussion at the Texas A&M University where he voluntarily offered the admission that though West Points’ cadet motto is “You will not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate those who do.”, his training under the CIA was the very opposite, stating “I was the CIA Director. We lied, we cheated, we stole. It was like we had entire training courses. (long pause) It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment”.
This is apparently the man for the job of dealing with matters of “truth” and “justice”.
Lea Gabrielle was approved for her position by Mike Pompeo, what are her “qualifications”? Well, Gabrielle is also CIA trained, and while assigned to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), she “directed and conducted global clandestine strategic intelligence collection operations.” Gabrielle also “deployed in tactical anti-terrorist operations in hostile environments”. After 12 years of active duty service, Lea Gabrielle became a television news journalist, who worked at NBC and FOX News.
The CIA really does not have the best track record for their role in “managing” foreign wars and counter-insurgency activities. In fact, they have been caught rather red handed in fueling such crisis situations. And these are the people who are deciding what information is fit for the American public, and western public in general, and what is not fit for their ears.
When the Matter of “Truth” Becomes a Threat to “National Security”
When the matter of truth is depicted as a possible threat to those that govern a country, you no longer have a democratic state. True, not everything can be disclosed to the public in real time, but we are sitting on a mountain of classified intelligence material that goes back more than 60 years.
How much time needs to elapse before the American people have the right to know the truth behind what their government agencies have been doing within their own country and abroad in the name of the “free” world?
From this recognition, the whole matter of declassifying material around the Russigate scandal in real time, and not highly redacted 50 years from now, is essential to addressing this festering putrefaction that has been bubbling over since the heinous assassination of President Kennedy on Nov. 22nd, 1963 and to which we are still waiting for full disclosure of classified papers 57 years later.
If the American people really want to finally see who is standing behind that curtain in Oz, now is the time.
These intelligence bureaus need to be reviewed for what kind of method and standard they are upholding in collecting their “intelligence,” that has supposedly justified the Mueller investigation and the never-ending Flynn investigation which have provided zero conclusive evidence to back up their allegations and which have massively infringed on the elected government’s ability to make the changes that they had committed to the American people.
Just like the Iraq and Libya war that was based off of cooked British intelligence (refer here and here), Russiagate appears to have also had its impetus from our friends over at MI6 as well. It is no surprise that Sir Richard Dearlove, who was then MI6 chief (1999-2004) and who oversaw and stood by the fraudulent intelligence on Iraq stating they bought uranium from Niger to build a nuclear weapon, is the very same Sir Richard Dearlove who promoted the Christopher Steele dossier as something “credible” to American intelligence.
In other words, the same man who is largely responsible for encouraging the illegal invasion of Iraq, which set off the never-ending wars on “terror,” that was justified with cooked British intelligence is also responsible for encouraging the Russian spook witch-hunt that has been occurring within the U.S. for the last four years…over more cooked British intelligence, and the FBI and CIA are knowingly complicit in this.
Neither the American people, nor the world as a whole, can afford to suffer any more of the so-called “mistaken” intelligence bumblings. It is time that these intelligence bureaus are held accountable for at best criminal negligence, at worst, treason against their own country.
The author can be reached at [email protected]
I wonder if Russian intelligence is as compromised by Zionists and Likudniks as US intelligence is?
I can’t imagine any country with as many amoral, treasonous cretins, totally lacking in moral fibre and decency as inhabit the alphabet “security” agencies and the corridors of power in the US. It really is a base, barbaric and godless fiefdom !
No, it is not. Vladimir Putin is proof of this. As for “freedom of the press” in the US, the late William Colby, ex CIA chief, openly admitted that the US media was under CIA supervision. After that he dies in a river “accident”.
Please explain how Vladimir Putin is proof of Russia not being compromised by Zionists.
And while you’re at it, please explain why Vladimir Putin shuts down Russian missile defenses in Syria whenever Israel wants to bomb Iranian targets.
Also, if you can, please quote or refer me to a speech by Vladimir Putin where he discusses the Zionist enemy.
And if it is not too much to ask, please explain what the Zionists listed below are doing in Russia.
If VVP was compromised by the Zionists, he would never had replaced Boris Yeltsin, nor resuscitated the Russian economy, nor improved the Russian military. Also, a Zionist “controlled” Putin would never have sent the Russian military to Syria.
I presume that the names you gave pertain to Russian Jews. What do you propose VVP do with them ? Something that guy with the mustache did in Germany ?
And what exactly has Russia been doing in Syria, if not protecting Israel from Iran?
“Jewish Ashkenazis represent 21% of all the billionaires in Russia, even though they comprise only 0.11% of the population.”
These billionaires, some of which are dual Israeli citizens, control a big chunk of the Russian economy. It is because of them that the Russian economy is afloat. If they pull out, and their tribesmen abroad sanction Russia, Russians will starve.
Your explanation does not explain anything. Why do you blindly support Putin? Are you Russian?
“These billionaires, some of which are dual Israeli citizens, control a big chunk of the Russian economy.”
The conflation of “ownership” and control by some has always been part of the lateral process of the transcendence of “The Soviet Union” by the Russian Federation, and expected by some since at least 1972.
Another conflation that some with little understanding of both “The USSR” and the Russian Federation are prone to is the conflation of money with influence.
I and others, including some with expectations in 1972 which became more widely accepted as valid, understand your “culture” has always had an aversion to complexity which was actively encouraged from inception, “We the people hold these truths to be self-evident..” being only one example of such encouragement.
The strategist who suggests attempting to solve all difficulties simultaneously with equal effort is usually a fool whose half-life can be extended by rendering them martyrs like Mr. Guevara – perhaps you can think of an example?
A wise strategist attempts to schedule and apportion efforts consistent with purpose, context, and facility whilst having opponents share the load (sometimes known as useful foolery) – perhaps you can think of an example ?
Some useful fools are wiser than some other useful fools, and the wiser useful fools reach an accommodation which includes to some degree a reappraisal by their counterparties of their status of useful foolery, some earlier and some later.
One previously useful fool who made an accomodation earlier was Mr. Potanin who publicly acknowledged this accomodation by way of “I can’t be an oligarch because I am a Russian” which happened in the mid-1990’s and was interpreted by some as being anti-Semitic.
Such interpretation was made of the observations of others which included Mr. Zhirinovsky when he said his mother was a Russian and his father an accountant.
Some other oligarchs during the 1990’s secured Israeli citizenship available under the right of return as a kind of insurance policy – which some needed to rely on sooner than others, whilst some others secured residency and other rights in other countries.
Some continued in the role of useful fools, an example being Mr. Berezhovsky who had a role in facilitating the results of the 1995 Russian Presidential election in conjunction with the donors of the constitution under which it was held.
As some of these donors were prone to say Time marches on, and so there was a Russian Presidential election in 1999 which was subjected to similar attempts to facilitate results which “unaccountably” did not prevail, despite bombings and other occurences from September 1999.
In March 2000 the newly elected President in conjunction with some of his advisors had a meeting with some useful fools whose main delegate was Mr. Khordokovsky.
The rules of useful foolery and the rules of non-useful foolery were outlined, but one useful fool – Mr. Khordokovsky – thought these rules did not apply to him.
Mr. Khordokovsky was mistaken and after serving a well deserved prison sentence for his naughtiness in the 1990’s resorted to the passport that other useful fools had used before him.
The other useful fools with varying degrees of reticence decided to make accomodations to become first non-useful fools, and then legal participants.
When a “society” is being transcended/restructured there is always a requirement of the metamorphosis of black into white which wise strategists incorporate in their musings and productions.
Another example of this was the Lithuanian election of May 1993 of Mr. Brazauskas instead of the retention of Mr. Landsbergis which facilitated a not widely publicised moratorium – called by some a regularisation of relationships – to facilitate the metamorphosis of black into white.
Artificial insemination is more advanced than in 1993, but the observation phrase used in certain circles in 1993 was : You can’t make babies by remaining a virgin.
inappropriate statement removed … mod
“I and others, including some with expectations in 1972 which became more widely accepted as valid, understand your “culture” has always had an aversion to complexity which was actively encouraged from inception, “We the people hold these truths to be self-evident..” being only one example of such encouragement.”
I am an Iranian. And I don’t understand the point of this needlessly long and complicated post.
Do you deny that Russia has been shutting off missile defenses in Syria, in direct collaboration with Israel, whenever the Zionist regime wants to bomb Iranian or allegedly-Iranian targets in Syria?
Do you deny that there are many wealthy Zionist Jews in Russia? Please explain how money and influence are mutually exclusive in Russia, as you claim.
Do you deny that Russia, and Putin in particular, has a very friendly relationship with Israel?
Please, refer me to a statement made by Vladimir Putin which demonstrates, or betrays, his anti-Zionist sentiments.
In Iran, we kicked out all the Zionists after the revolution, and their ill-gotten wealth was nationalized. We currently have no diplomatic or commercial ties with Israel. And if Russia wasn’t in Syria protecting Israel, we would be a lot further ahead in our 41-year-long struggle against the Zionist pseudo-state, which Russia officially recognizes as a legitimate country.
So, I beg your pardon, but what on God’s green earth are you talking about?
The CIA etc functions structurally, as total world wrap around narrative control, on behalf of bourgeois capitalism. At heart it is an English invention. It is the bourgeois class’s major key to the maintenance of capitalist dominance. Global mind control. They could not bear to be without it. They so desperately need their terrorist “Death Star,”
To crack this is to crack the organized heart of the capitalist mind. No piecemeal operation here.
May The Force Be With Us
Bourgeois Capitalism has evolved into far more destructive CORPORATE capitalism, controlled by oligarchic industrial bankers.
“At heart it is an English invention.” I think this is truer than most are aware.
The nature of the much-vaunted ‘special relationship’ between the USA and the UK (Britain) is extremely close and confined to this small group of trans-Atlantic oligarchic industrial bankers, themselves transformed from a ruling upper-class (originally Norman French invaders).
The vast majority of ordinary people on both sides of the Atlantic are kept totally ignorant of how this upper-class cabal work seemlessly for their own advantage and use national and government resources to do so. It is extra-Parliamentary. The travesty of the ‘Assange trial’ shows how ruthless and powerful they are on the Eastern side of the Atlantic. Cynthia Chung’s article tell us something about what goes on on the Western side. Mass mind control is one of their specialities, developed over the last 100 years since Edward Bernays and made infinitely easier thanks to modern communications technology. Propaganda is now pervasive, insidious, and omnipresent. They are so confidant of their total control that the propaganda is so-obviously a blatant lie (Navalny is the latest). We also have the significance of ‘Five Eyes’ as another example of this unity, and its spying even on other Nato members.
You know, you have to grant a certain amount of grudging respect to these people for sheer hutzpah. Facts be damned, they just keep putting this stuff out there time and time again (see Navalny, et al.) and then repeat the lies over and over again after that until they pound it into the mass consciousness by brute force. Never mind that more astute observers catch them in the act every time or the fact that the lies themselves are transparently obvious on even cursory examination, they know the power of the all-encompassing mass media megaphone and repetition trumps all. Of course it helps that their American targets aren’t the brightest bulbs ever produced.
Look on the “bright” side: The American public IS improving.
Slowly, that is true…..however still fast enough………… to cause the Masters of Discourse very serious problems…..force them into overt, blatant censorship and other things (like accelerating their timetables before “windows” close on the plans of their globalist forced population reduction creeps like Bill Gates…..) that just shed even more light into dark shadows they desperately need KEPT in the dark.
So rather than bemoan that slowness…Which IS speeding up….I’d rather concentrate on the desperate need for these demons to end their Trump problem………..by ending his life….ASAP.
Because that’s about where we are in this struggle.
SO, looking at this thing in terms of the slow, grinding but steady shift in the “correlation of forces” to put this in military terms…..as well as slowly dawning consciousness terms, THAT “ain’t bad”!
It’s progress for anyone a little bit weary of waiting for decades…….for the ante to be raised against those demons.
Just not “progress” for those, like Gretchen Whitmer, now sporting one of those “trendy” 8645 TDS lapel pins:
86 = dispose of…or kill
45 = 45th President
““correlation of forces” to put this in military terms”
Perhaps Warsaw Pact terms would be more accurate ?
Correction: Ignatius is not and never was NED president as cited in this article and the related newsweek article.
Gershman has been president since inception in 1983 and is an extreme anti Russian neo con, having staffed Ned with such stalwarts as nuland and albright. NED was justifiably banned from Russia for its subversive activities. It would be a hell of lot smarter if other countries would do the same unless they wished to “enjoy” their own version of a color revolution.
David Ignatius is foreign editor of The Washington Post; it is commonly accepted that he is the mouthpiece for the cia.
Dear Ms Chung,
Is that despicable creature’s full name David Ignatius Loyola?
My weak pun points at the governing ideology within the US military-security-intelligence apparatus.
The American People have always been comfortable with the government beibg run by gangsters. The invention of the CIA et. al. only puts this on a more formal footing. Its ok while the economy is going up, but not while its coming down.
‘Cowards die many times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once’. Shakespeare I should like the US enter a period of self reflection and self critical thinking of their place in the world and whether US intelligence spread democracy, corruption or manure. Mostly the latter.
totally agree but along with the other problems…not easy to figure out how to get rid of them.
The real threat is actually MIC.
FBI, CIA, Congress, Senate, etc are only useful tools for this out of control monster that is a true head of entity known as Deep State.
“treason against their own country.”
Wise analysts/strategists do not conflate criticism with attack, and hence this is broadcast informed by such protocol.
Much of your data broadcast has validity but as is the norm not omniscience, which is not achievable given lateral process.
Some additional data which you may choose to consider in conjunction with your data, would not be shared through certain portals despite noise to signal ratios.
Hence my comments are restricted to “your evaluation” and the header of the thread which may not be of your authorship.
Evaluation is always a function of purpose, and purposes are rarely shared.
Evaluation is also predicated on the definition/framing of those entities subjected to evaluation, including but not restricted to – What are The United States of America and how are they facilitated..
“treason against their own country.”
From inception at least some in “The United States of America” have believed that “The United States of America” was their country, where as others have sought to ensure that by using tools, including but not restricted to “We the people hold these truths to be self-evident”, the FBI, the CIA and others, “The United States of America” remains their (possessive case) country.
According to Mr. Kaganovich, Mr. Stalin was of the view that his position was informed by two saying of his namely – The Bolsheviks learned to talk and I learned to listen – You don’t need to wear a star to be the sheriff (Mr. Stalin being quite keen on “Westerns”..
Social relations which encourage the seeking of attribution often facilitate talk.
One instance of this was in the CIA influenced film named in some markets “The Good Shepherd”, in the following scene.
To arrange an assassination attempt against Mr. Castro a CIA agent visits a significant person in the “US” mafia.
The significant person in the “US” mafia asks the CIA agent – what is in it for him – and the CIA agent doesn’t understand and asks for a fuller explanation.
The significant person replies approximately “Well the Italians have their families, and the n##gers have their music, what do you have?”
The CIA agent replies “We have the United States of America – the rest of you are here as guests.”
This is a script from a film, but research tends to show that this is a widely held view in various “Us” organisations informing practice.
Hence your evaluation of “treason against their own country.” is likely predicated on your failure to understand that it is their country (possessive case) through regularly testing hypotheses through implementation – not anyone else’s including those who believe that it is their country – and hence the CIA and CIA are not traitors to it.
The definition of “National Security” is also predicated on ” failure to understand that it is their country (possessive case) through regularly testing hypotheses through implementation – not anyone else’s including those who believe that it is their country” – and hence “National Security” is effectively attempts at securing within linear tolerances “The United States of America and how are they facilitated”.
Hence some are of the view that as a consequence of the attempted processes by “The United States of America” in “securing within linear tolerances The United States of America and how they are facilitated”, the CIA and other tools are part of these attempts, which in turn facilitates opportunities of transcendence of “The United States of America”.
Hence among the real threats of “The United States of America” is “The United States of America” as has been and continues to be established through implementation of hypotheses.
Yet once the hypotheses is proven to be a fact, should not we the people confront the threat so as to not let it weaken our position(s).
“should not we the people confront the threat so as to not let it weaken our position(s).”
A more extensive answer of some length using components of how and with the participation of whom the Soviet Union was undermined was broadcast through this portal at circa 17-00 hrs EST/EDT October 20th 2020 and subjected to moderation, but has not yet appeared on this blog.
So in case this doesn’t happen I’ll share a simpler component of an answer.
1. You are asking a question which emulates the present social relations you wish to “overcome” and hence in some measure you will become enmazed in close analogues of present social relations – an example of such processes being the Bolshevik project from at least 1903 until 1991.
2. The macro question from which others are crested is not if to confront, but how to confront since present social relations confront by design.
3. The how to confront is a function of facility and opportunity in part facilitated by the interactions of “The United States of America” with others.
The last part of the previous broadcast was a thumbnail outlining of “We the people”‘s main weaknesses which will likely condition their attempts to attain their purpose which some may be loathe to “publish”.
Another macro question previously and presently posed is – How to drown a drowning man with the minimum of blowback?
Enjoy your journey.
I ask as an individual not as a social one so past projects do not concern me so much.
And I also base my arguments (confrontation(s)) on a laws of nature basis not on a defective human law one, once again circumventing the social relations angle.
The how’s are mostly an in court proceedings should the courts actually be open for business one day, and we the people are only as weak as our strongest published individual link, and ty, the long journey shall be enjoyed.
“I ask as an individual not as a social one so past projects do not concern me so much.”
You are an assumer, since you assume that the projects are past and the hows juridical.
However the durations and lengths of journeys should always be enjoyed.
Go well in the world.
Thank you for your question since like in volleyball some do the set-up and some do the strike, and between us we have catalysed a process where the opponents are over-reacting, and an example in answer to your original question.
The more extensive “unpublished” broadcast through this portal at circa 17-00 hrs EST/EDT October 20th 2020 and subjected to moderation has achieved its catalysing purpose and can be shared with others if those who deem to be monitors become less loathe to publish it in full, whilst recognising the role of the moderator in publishing OlyaPola on October 21, 2020 · at 12:32 am EST/EDT.
Enjoy your journey whilst being careful how you confront and who you confront.
The alleged CIA agent in charge of recruiting the journalists said they were cheaper than hookers.
Excellent and informative article that ties all the loose pieces together and shows how they all relate to one another.
Dearlove by name but not by Nature. He features in one of my satirical videos regarding Epstein and his jewish connections.
There is nothing like Shakespeare to get the blood boiling. Epstein is not Caesar but what did happen? This senario includes blackmail and deals with the heads of 3 intelligence agencies and their involvement.
(Brennan CIA Robert Mueller FBI Sir Richard Dearlove MI6 Tamir Pardo Mossad)
‘Shylock’s Revenge’ Epstein: maps the degredation of America using the CIA, FBI, Mossad and MI6. All the main actors show up here as Roman soldiers or senators none of whom consider democracy a goal to be achieved without corruption. A pound of flesh is taken and the blood flows freely.
http://www.cowdisley.com/videos/shylock.mp4 or https://youtu.be/ZxgNiPUJ4gk
Apart from demanding the release of Mrs Clinton’s emails, it seems that Mr Trump has been on the phone with Mr Putin a bit over recent weeks. To discuss nuclear arms treaties, among other things. Things are looking up.
Don’t know about that. What I know is that he reports his contacts with foreign governments. They may shade the content but the fact of it is reported.
And I checked out Lavrov
Can you find those contacts?
Harley Schlanger reports the same Trump-Putin contacts as Simon does……..and on the same matter of arms treaties…plus the additional matter of cooling off the Caucasus Fighting……which neither president needs ramped up. He does that right here………… on his last appearance on X22 Spotlight:
from 5 days ago……
He doesn’t link his sources,,he’s just a guest………..it’s Dave show, not his…..,,however I have known Harley for 35 years….and he never makes stuff up. And furthermore, he invites anyone in the world to email him questions at
Bro, Putin made a suggestion that the Start 2 treaty gets renewed for a year as it stands.
There was very little interest from the US, excepting false news and stupid pressure reported by the Russian negotiators – like, China must join otherwise we don’t negotiate. They even manufactured a situation where they made as if China did not attend, with false flaggies supposedly at the meeting tables. It was a joke.
1. See Smoothie here for actual evidence:
2. On October 16th, one of the permanent Russian secretaries to the UN tweeted this:
Alexander [email protected]__Alimov
President Vladimir Putin proposed to extend the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (NewSTART) for at least 1 year without any preconditions.
‘Please formulate our position to the US partners and try to get some kind of intelligible answer from them in the nearest future.’
(I took all the flags and stuff out of the tweet in order to display it here without funny characters.)
I would consider a Russian Second Secretary to the UN on his formal communication channel as a source with evidence. He translated and repeated what Mr Putin said.
Today the WSJ reports:
U.S., Russia Near Deal to Extend Nuclear Treaty and Freeze Warheads for a Year
Breakthrough on New START agreement would buy time for a future pact that the Trump administration says should include China
– you read the Sweetie piece above and integrate the nonsense that the media is posting and the quality of the US negotiators and their information,
– and you see that on the 16th Putin was agitating and had no more patience – 4 days ago
– and you see that there is no phone call reported on either Putin or Lavrov’s formal schedule which they have to report to the Russian people,
certainly Harvey Schlinger must bring some evidence.
And even late yesterday Dmitry Peskov says:
“regrettably for the time being no desirable progress is in sight”
Look carefully how that statement is formulated — there is zippo, nothing today, and nothing in sight.
Let me fix an error – I said Start 2, but it is New Start. Apologies for that.
I will defer to your forensic source-checking skills. On the other hand, perhaps it is the case that highly sensitive discussions do not surface via the usual channels. And I will remain optimistic. In any event, we will soon enough know the truth, or otherwise. Best wishes.
As Larchmonter so frequently says, we do that at the Saker blog – We try to be sure of our facts and sources. And this is not so much forensics but rather that I’ve been following the treaties for some time. From a forlorn abandoned coffee treaty somewhere in Central America, to big ones like the New Start. I also do not buy the La Rouche commentary wholesale and would advise others to check it thoroughly. Very frequently it does not have feet to stand on.
So, if these contacts are ‘hidden’, then of course it is a great excuse to not work on a factual basis.
I did an update here in the Cafe. If you are interested in more than hope, but in real analysis, check out Moon of Alabama’s analysis included in this update. He deals with the troublesome word ‘verifiable’.
And as I said there, “If Trump can use it for political ammunition or political capital, they will extend. If not, they will not. In the mean time, the world is moving into a crisis of a new arms race. This is actually very serious. ”
The US administration is clearly not really willing to extend this treaty – even for a year as an almost emergency measure. And then, once we recognize that, we have to deal with ‘agreement capable’, which we all know that the Russian stance at the moment is that the US is not agreement capable.
Part of “psychological warfare/perception management” is based on the tendency of some humans, when they perceive various data-streams which may or may not be closely connected or even connected at all, to connect these data-streams to create a narrative which is deemed to constitute “plausible belief”.
Other examples of this are silence within which some people fill with their own presumptions, and absences/lacunae which they attempt to fill with their assumptions/expectations.
Your cultural assumptions and practices are illustrated throughout your broadcast including by the use of Lavrov in respect of Mr. Lavrov, and Putin in respect of Mr. Putin.
To paraphrase Mr. Rove – You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are the ones you should concentrate on.
Thank you for illustrating some of the assumptions and methods of the opponents.
The effect of their corruption and incompetence is in fact the implosion in the US today.
The CIA is merely the mechanism whereby the MIC generates situations to justify ongoing wasteful spending which has run the US into how many knows $ trillion in national debt to the point of insolvency.
The FBI is there to stop domestic dissent and manipulate internal politics.
The house of cards will come tumbling down in the end and in terms of the FBI it already has started with the disclosures over Comey, McCabe etc over the fake Russian Collusion narrative for the 2016 election.
Hillary lost in 2016 because everyone knows she is untrustworthy and voters wanted a new direction, not more of the same stagnation that had occurred from H Bush to Clinton to W Bush to Obama.
Kissinger was a British agent along with Soros sent to US to enable a takeover the former rebel colony.
Both agencies use-by date has arrived and it is more than likely within the next decade they will cease to exist, being replaced.
Correct, Santiago. Both agencies are symptoms of the Malignant Virus of Oligarchism which has afflicted nearly every form of society in the history of the world…..since the onset of civilization.
Life is brief…..and the enormous temptation of the non-oligarch is to take shortcuts and betray humanity….in order to “get ahead” of his or her struggling peers…and enjoy “the good things in life” : wealth, status, power, recognition and favor of those “higher up” than him or her self. And so forth.
The Top of the Pyramid has been well versed in manipulating “their lessers” in currying their favor and serving their interests………….even to the extent of betraying ALL ideals of morality, Patriotism or whatever else, in the process..
Both the FBI and the CIA (and some less powerful and even some less corrupt agencies in other parts of the world, to some degree) were afflicted with this corruption against the General Well Being …and for the ever increasing MATERIAL (if not spiritual….LOL) well being of their top echelons…from the “get-go”.
Patrick Byrne may have done some service working with the Men In Black (his term for the rank and file FBI agents he worked with in solving a murder case) and he and they ALL may have been well intentioned at one time…….however the case of Maria Butina opened Patrick’s eyes…and, he reports…..many of the eyes of the Men in Black, as well…on that case……and many others…. to the Evil At the Top…commanding them all:
Links to that whole (breaking “October Surprise”) story are within my comment 3 days ago on Patrick and Maria’s case………….. of two good people…..caught up in that Matrix of Institutional Evil, quite a few other good people are also plopped right into the middle of: